Polyflex stents for malignant oesophageal and oesophagogastric stricture: a prospective, multicentric study

Outcome of palliative esophageal stenting for malignant dysphagia: a retrospective analysis

Greater than 50% of patients with esophageal carcinoma are found to be incurable at the time of diagnosis, leaving only palliative options. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMs) are effective for relieving symptoms and complications associated with esophageal carcinoma and improving quality of life. We undertook a retrospective analysis to evaluate the experience of palliative esophageal stenting for symptomatic malignant dysphagia in our institution over a period of 7 years. Between January 1999 and January 2006, 126 patients who received SEMs for malignant dysphagia were identified using an upper gastrointestinal specialist nurse clinician database. Data were obtained from patient case notes, endoscopy, histopathology, radiology, and external agency databases. Of the 126 identified, 36 patients were excluded from the analysis. A number of variables including age, sex, presenting complaints, type of stent, indications of stenting, success or failure of stent insertion, survival rate, and complication rate were analyzed. Of the 90 patients, 55 (61%) were male and 35 (39%) were female. The mean age of patients was 70.79 (range 40-97) years. The predominant presenting complaints were dysphagia (n = 81) and weight loss (n = 48). The indication for stenting was worsening dysphagia in all patients. Tumors were confined to the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction in 73 patients (81%), and the mid-esophagus in 17 (19%). Adenocarcinoma was identified in 61 patients (67.8%) and squamous cell carcinoma in 29 (32.2%). Stenting numbers were comparable in endoscopic and radiologic groups (47 vs. 43), with successful stent deployment in 89 patients. The 7- and 30-day mortality was 9% (n = 8) and 28% (n = 25), respectively. Comparable numbers of early deaths were seen in both radiologic (n = 13) and endoscopic (n = 12) groups. Causes of early inpatient death included hemorrhage (n = 5), pneumonia (n = 7), exhaustion (n = 2), cardiac causes (n = 3), perforation (n = 1), and sepsis (n = 1). The number of patients with complications was 41 (45.6%), 25 in the surgical group and 15 in the radiologic group; the difference was not significant (P = 0.13). The mean survival time was 92.5 (0-638) days and median survival time was 61 days. A subgroup of patients with complete dysphagia (score 4) gained a mean survival of 59 days. Those patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy survived significantly longer than those receiving stenting alone (152.8 days vs. 71.8 days). There is no significant difference in complications or survival when using endoscopic or radiologic methods to deploy SEMs in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer. Mortality is low; however, the morbidity rate is significant. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, in addition to stenting, survived significantly longer than those with a stent only.

Self-expanding plastic stents for inoperable malignant strictures of the cervical esophagus

Dysphagia and respiratory complications are the major problems in patients suffering from malignant strictures of the cervical esophagus. In inoperable cases, interventional palliation is the cornerstone of treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of self-expanding plastic stents (SEPS) in this group of patients. In a retrospective study, 23 patients suffering from various malignant obstructive diseases of the cervical esophagus, including squamous cell carcinoma (n = 10), laryngeal cancer (n = 7), lung cancer with esophageal invasion (n = 5), and metastatic breast cancer (n = 1), underwent SEPS placement, under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. Tracheoesophageal fistula was documented in five patients. Technical success rate, improvement of dysphagia grade, and stent-related complications were evaluated after stent placement. Stent insertion was successfully achieved in all cases, namely in 20 patients at the first stent placement attempt and in three patients after a second attempt. Dysphagia grade was notably improved after 24 h. In two cases, major complications occurred. These were successfully treated without the need of stent extraction. Barium swallowing studies demonstrated complete sealing of all fistulas. Foreign-body sensation that gradually disappeared within the first week after stent placement was observed in eight patients. Recurrence of dysphagia occurred in three patients, due to hyperplastic tissue proliferation (n = 2) and tumor overgrowth (n = 1). Late migration of the stent was detected in one case after 67 days. SEPS placement is an effective and safe palliative treatment for malignant strictures of the cervical esophagus. Main advantages include easy retrievability and reduced rates of reinterventions.

Comparison of double-layered and covered Niti-S stents for palliation of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Covered metal stents have been accepted as the treatment of choice for malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal and gastric cardia cancer, but stent migration is a major shortcoming. A double-layered Niti-S stent was therefore introduced to obviate this problem. We aimed to compare double-layered and covered Niti-S stents regarding safety, efficacy, and feasibility in the treatment of malignant dysphagia.

METHODS

Thirty-seven consecutive patients with malignant dysphagia due to inoperable esophageal or gastric cardia cancer were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. The main outcomes were technical success, improvement in dysphagia score after stent insertion, and complications.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved at a similar rate in both groups (covered, 19/19 [100%]vs double layered, 16/17 [94%]). A week after stent insertion, the mean dysphagia score improved significantly in the covered and double-layered groups compared to baseline (from 2.95 +/- 0.52 and 2.88 +/- 0.33 to 1.00 +/- 0.47 and 1.06 +/- 0.24, respectively; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the survival of the patients in the two groups. The overall complications, including stent migration and tumor overgrowth, occurred more frequently with covered stents (11/19 [58%]) than double-layered stents (2/17 [12%]; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Newly-developed, self-expanding metal stents, (covered and double-layered Niti-S stents) were equally effective and feasible treatments for malignant dysphagia. However, double-layered Niti-S stents are preferable due to their favorable safety profile.

Self-expanding plastic esophageal stents versus jejunostomy tubes for the maintenance of nutrition during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study

In patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, the inability to eat may severely impair nutritional status. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of the Polyflex self-expanding silicone stent (PS) versus a jejunostomy tube (JT) for maintaining nutrition during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled for resectional surgery. Thirty-six patients were treated either with PS placement (12 patients) or JT placement (24 patients) prior to receiving an 8-week course of chemoradiation therapy. Patients were interviewed weekly until cessation of therapy. Patient data were collected on procedural success and complication rates, nutritional status, and dysphagia scores. PS placement was successful in 11 of 12 patients (92%), and those 11 patients were able to resume oral nutrition. Dysphagia scores improved from a mean of 3 to 1 in the PS group (P < 0.005) but did not change significantly in the JT group. PS were removed endoscopically without complications prior to the esophagectomies. Albumin levels and weight increased significantly in both the PS and JT groups. There were no significant differences between groups in the procedural success rates (PS 92% vs. JT 100%, P = 0.33), complication rates (PS 22% vs. JT 4%, P = 0.11), mean increase in weight (PS 4.4 kg vs. JT 4.2 kg, P = 0.59), and mean increase in serum albumin (PS 0.62 g/dL vs. JT 0.44 g/dL, P = 0.05). PS is a safe and effective alternative to a surgical JT for maintaining nutrition in this subset of patients.

Advances in research of esophageal stents

Esophageal stents were used initially in the palliative treatment of esophageal carcinoma to improve the life quality of the patients in the advanced stage. Along with the appearance of many new kinds of esophageal stents, esophageal stents have been used in the management of the benign esophageal strictures, and clinical effectiveness has been made. This article reviews the application of the esophageal stents in the benign and malignant esophageal strictures.

Inoperable esophageal cancer and outcome of palliative care

AIM: To determine the outcome of esophageal cancer patients referred for palliative care, in Gorgan and Gonbad gastrointestinal clinics, northeast of Iran.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done on inoperable esophageal cancer cases referred to gastrointestinal clinics in Gorgan and Gonbad city (2005-2006). Demographic data were collected during the procedure and cases were followed up every one month. Improvement proportion was calculated with 95% confidence interval, to determine the rate of improvement. Survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the duration of palliative care effectiveness.

RESULTS: We recruited 39 cases into the study. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most prevalent (92.3%). The middle third of the esophagus was involved predominantly (51.3%). Dilation was the most preferred method (89.7%) and stenting was done in 4 cases. Decreasing dysphagia score was not related to palliation method or pathology type of carcinoma. Age of the patients was significantly related to the improvement of dysphagia score. Mean survival time was 137.6 d and median was 103 d.

CONCLUSION: Results of this study showed a low survival rate after palliative care in esophageal cancer cases despite dysphagia scores’ improvement after dilating or stenting.

A randomized prospective comparison of self-expandable plastic stents and partially covered self-expandable metal stents in the palliation of malignant esophageal dysphagia

OBJECTIVES

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide effective palliation in patients with malignant dysphagia, although severe complications and mortality may result. We performed a prospective controlled trial to compare a new self-expanding polyester mesh stent (Polyflex) with SEMS (Ultraflex).

METHODS

One hundred one patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma were randomized to placement of a Polyflex (N=47) or a partially covered Ultraflex (N=54) stent. Patients with esophagogastric junction (EGJ) malignancy were excluded.

RESULTS

Placement was successful in 46 (98%) patients with the Polyflex and 54 (100%) patients with the Ultraflex stent. In one patient, the Polyflex stent could not be placed. After 1 wk, dysphagia was improved by at least 1 grade in 100% of the Polyflex group and in 94% of the Ultraflex group. Major complications were observed in 48% of the Polyflex group and 33% of the Ultraflex group. Intraprocedural perforation occurred in 1 Polyflex and 1 Ultraflex patient. Two Polyflex patients had postprocedural hemorrhage. Twenty (44%) patients with a Polyflex stent and 18 (33%) with an Ultraflex stent had recurrent dysphagia because of tumor overgrowth, stent migration, hyperplastic granulomatous reaction, or food bolus impaction. Multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher complication rate with Polyflex than with Ultraflex stents (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4). However, median survival was 134 days with Polyflex and 122 days with Ultraflex stents (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was seen in palliation of dysphagia between the two stents. Significantly more complications, especially late stent migration, were observed in the Polyflex group.