An evaluation of complications, revisions, and long-term aesthetic outcomes in nonsyndromic metopic craniosynostosis

Power-Assisted Particulate Bone Grafting Effectively Prevents Osseous Defects After Cranial Vault Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) is the gold standard in the operative treatment of craniosynostosis. Full thickness osseous defects (FTOD) of the calvaria have been observed in 5% to 15% patients after CVR, with higher rates cited in the fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) subset. Particulate bone graft (PBG) harvested manually has been shown to decrease FTOD after FOA from 24% to 5.5%. The authors used a modified technique using a powered craniotome, with the hypothesis that the technique would also improve outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent CVR for craniosynostosis between 2004 and 2014. Patient demographics, diagnosis, age, operative details, and postoperative care were reviewed in detail. Categorical, nonparametric variables were compared by Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common diagnoses were metopic (n = 41), sagittal (n = 33), and unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (n = 31); 65% (n = 88) underwent FOA, 29% (n = 39) underwent single-stage total vault reconstruction, and 6% (n = 8) had a posterior vault reconstruction. CVR was performed without PBG in 95 patients and with PBG in 40 patients. Without PBG, FTOD were discovered on clinical examination in 18% of patients (n=17): 11 presented with subcentimeter defects, while 6 had larger defects requiring revision cranioplasty (6% operative revision rate). Among those receiving PBG, 1 patient presented a subcentimeter FTOD (2.5% FTOD incidence and 0% operative revision rate).

CONCLUSION

Particulate bone graft harvested with a powered device decreases the rate of FTOD and reoperation rate after CVR for craniosynostosis.

Frontoethmoidal meningoencephalocele: appraisal of a craniofacial surgical teaching program in Cambodia

OBJECTIVE The treatment of frontoethmoidal meningoencephaloceles (fMECs) in Cambodia was not possible before the development of a program that taught some Khmer surgeons (working at the Children's Surgical Centre in Phnom Penh) how to surgically correct these deformities without any foreign help. The results of that teaching program are discussed in this paper. METHODS Between 2004 and 2009, both local and visiting foreign neurosurgical and craniofacial surgeons (the visitors coming twice a year) worked together to operate on 200 patients, and a report on those cases was published in 2010. In subsequent years (2010-2016), the Khmer surgeons operated on 100 patients without the presence of the visiting surgeons. In this study, the authors compare the second case series with the previously published series and the literature in terms of results and complications. The operations were performed with limited surgical materials and equipment, using a combined bicoronal and transfacial approach in most cases. Most of the patients came from very poor families. RESULTS Organizing the postoperative follow-up of these low-income patients (mean age 12 years) was probably the most challenging part of this teaching program. Nine of the patients were lost to surgical follow-up. In the other cases, cosmetic results were judged by the surgeons as worse than the patient's preoperative appearance in 1 case, poor in 12 cases, average in 27, and good in 51-data that are significantly less encouraging than the results reported by the joint local/visiting teams in 2010 (p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, patients and parents tended to have a better overall opinion about the surgical results (rating the results as good in 84% of the 80 cases in which parent or patient ratings were available). Twenty postoperative complications were observed (the most common being temporary CSF leaks). The rate of immediate postoperative complications directly related to fMEC surgery was less than that in the previous series, but the difference was not statistically significant (20% vs 28.5%, p = 0.58). No death was noted in this case series (in contrast to the previous series). Social questionnaire results confirmed that fMEC correction partially improved the adverse social and educational consequences of fMEC in affected children. CONCLUSIONS In the current state of this program, the local surgeons are able to correct fMECs in their own country, without foreign assistance, with good results in a majority of patients. Such humanitarian teaching programs generally take years to achieve the initial aims.

Bite force and electromyography evaluation after cranioplasty in patients with craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

This long-term follow-up investigation aimed to assess masticatory muscle function in 15 patients with craniosynostosis with detachment of the temporal muscle during fronto-orbital advancement 6 years after cranioplasty compared with a non-operative stomatognathic healthy cohort in the same age group (n = 25).

STUDY DESIGN

The follow-up assessment for the operated children occurred on average 5.2 ± 1.7 years after surgery at the age of 7 ± 1.6 years. The maximum bite force was assessed, in addition to the bilateral function of both temporal and masseter muscles, which were analyzed using superficial electromyography.

RESULTS

The maximum bite force was 257 ± 89 N 255 ± 88 N (right/left), respectively, in the group of operated children and 212 ± 61 N and 203 ± 57 N (right/left), respectively, in the control group, without clinical relevant difference between groups. The surface electromyography signal of the temporal muscle correlated positively with the bite force and showed a slightly lower average resting tone activity in the control group, whereas muscle fatigue occurred slightly faster in the operated children in both muscles without statistically significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no measurable dysfunction in the temporal muscle after the operative correction of craniosynostosis compared with a healthy population of children.

Temporal Deformity Objectively Measured Before and After Surgery for Metopic Synostosis: Retrusion Rather than Hollowing

The temporal contour deformity typical of metopic synostosis is often referred to as temporal hollowing, but has not been quantitatively defined. This deformity is present before surgery and remains to a varying extent at long-term follow-up. The present study aimed to objectively evaluate the degree of this contour deformity in metopic synostosis before and after surgical correction.All children surgically treated for metopic synostosis at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 2002 and 2014 (n = 120) with appropriate computed tomography scans (n = 160) performed preoperatively and/or at follow-up at 3 years of age were included. Depending on age, 1 of 2 surgical techniques was used. Children presenting before the age of 6 months were treated with frontal remodeling in combination with a spring (S group), whereas children older than 6 months were treated with a bone transplant (BT group). The bony temporal deformity was measured with a semiautomatic MATLAB program and patients were compared to sex- and age-matched controls.The deformity was significantly reduced in both groups (P < 0.001). In the S group, it was reduced from a mean ± standard deviation of 3.6 ± 1.9% to 1.0 ± 1.2% and in the BT group, it was reduced from 3.3% ± 1.4% to 1.1% ± 0.8%.The contour deformity in metopic synostosis is present both before and after surgery and should therefore be termed temporal retrusion (TR). This assessment method enables objective comparison of TR before and after surgical correction and is a potential tool to evaluate TR in metopic synostosis.

Frontal Sinus Volume and Frontal Bar Position Are Associated in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Frontal sinus pneumatization plays an important role in brow protrusion, and absence of frontal sinus development may be associated with brow retrusion. Using unicoronal craniosynostosis as a model, the authors studied the relationship among frontal sinus volume, supraorbital retrusion, and brow position.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of unicoronal craniosynostosis patients with head computed tomographic scans and photographs taken from ages 5 to 18 years. Frontal sinus volume and supraorbital retrusion were calculated using three-dimensional computed tomographic reconstructions. A "brow score" from 0 to 3 was assigned to each patient's photographs by a consensus of two craniofacial surgeons; sinus morphology and brow scores were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 20 unicoronal craniosynostosis patients. The affected side demonstrated increased retrusion (7.1 ± 3.7 mm versus 3.0 ± 3.1 mm; p < 0.001) and decreased frontal sinus volume (0.8 ± 0.9 cc versus 2.6 ± 1.8 cc; p < 0.001). Qualitative brow retrusion scores differed between affected and unaffected sides (score of 0, 17 percent affected versus 78 percent unaffected; score of 1, 28 percent versus 22 percent; score of 2, 39 percent versus 0 percent; and score of 3, 17 percent versus 0 percent; p < 0.001). Brow scores trended with retrusion measurements (score of 0, 2.7 ± 2.9 mm retrusion; score of 1, 6.1 ± 3.5 mm; score of 2, 8.9 ± 3.2 mm; and score of 3, 9.7 ± 2.8 mm; p < 0.001). Subjects with brow scores of 0 or 1 had larger frontal sinus volumes than subjects with brow scores of 2 or 3 (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative brow retrusion correlates strongly with both quantitative supraorbital retrusion and frontal sinus volume. Although this retrospective study cannot prove causality, which is likely multifactorial, its strong correlation with frontal sinus pneumatization highlights the importance of the frontal sinus in brow position in unicoronal craniosynostosis.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Impact of Fronto-Orbital Advancement on Frontal Sinus Volume, Morphology, and Disease in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Fronto-orbital advancement for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis has been thought to injure frontal sinus buds, lead to chronic sinus disease, and influence final forehead shape. This study investigates the effect of fronto-orbital advancement in infancy on subsequent frontal sinus volume, morphology, and disease.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients treated with fronto-orbital advancement in infancy with a head computed tomographic scan obtained at age 7 to 18 years. Facial trauma patients served as age-matched controls. Frontal sinus characteristics were determined using three-dimensional reconstructions.

RESULTS

The study included 33 nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients who underwent fronto-orbital advancement (n = 20 unicoronal; n = 13 metopic) and 20 control patients. The incidence of at least unilateral pneumatization was 94 percent for fronto-orbital advancement subjects and 95 percent for control subjects. Mean frontal sinus volumes for unicoronal synostosis, metopic synostosis, and control groups were 3427 ± 2294, 4576 ± 3510, and 4157 ± 3963 mm, respectively (p = 0.598). Asymmetry scores were as follows: unicoronal synostosis, 56 ± 35 percent; metopic synostosis, 36 ± 33 percent; and control, 23 ± 24 percent (p = 0.010). Unicoronal subjects displayed prominent asymmetry, with increased pneumatization on the unaffected side. Frontal sinus volume correlated with age at computed tomography but not with age at fronto-orbital advancement. Interrater reliability was 0.997. One fronto-orbital advancement subject and zero control subjects demonstrated computed tomographic evidence of frontal sinus disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Frontal sinus volume, morphology, and disease do not differ significantly between control subjects and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis subjects following fronto-orbital advancement, but subtle differences such as increased asymmetry in the unicoronal synostosis group can be appreciated. Further research with syndromic craniosynostosis patients undergoing multiple procedures may help elucidate the association between surgical disruption and frontal sinus development.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Objective Assessment of the Interfrontal Angle for Severity Grading and Operative Decision-Making in Metopic Synostosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a previously validated interfrontal angle for classification of severity of metopic synostosis and as an aid to operative decision-making.

METHODS

An expert panel was asked to study 30 cases ranging from minor to severe metopic synostosis. Based on computed tomographic images of the skull and clinical photographs, they classified the severity of trigonocephaly (1 = normal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe) and management (0 = nonoperative and 1 = operative). The severity scores and management reported by experts were then pooled and matched with the interfrontal angle computed from each respective computed tomographic scan. A threshold was identified at which most experts agree on operative management.

RESULTS

Expert severity scores were higher for more acute interfrontal angles. There was a high concordance at the extremes of classifications, severe (4) and normal (1) (p < 0.0001); however, between interfrontal angles of 114.3 and 136.1 degrees, there exists a "gray zone," with severe discordance in expert rankings. An operative threshold of 118.2 degrees was identified, with the interfrontal angle able to predict the expert panel's decision to proceed with surgery 87.6 percent of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

The interfrontal angle has been previously validated as a simple, accurate, and reproducible means for diagnosing trigonocephaly, but must be obtained from computed tomographic data. In this article, the authors demonstrate that the interfrontal angle can be used to further characterize the severity of trigonocephaly. It also correlated with expert decision-making for operative versus nonoperative management. This tool may be used as an adjunct to clinical decision-making when the decision to proceed with surgery may not be straightforward.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, V.

Anthropometric Outcomes following Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic Synostosis

BACKGROUND

The authors' purpose is to present changes in anthropometric fronto-orbital dimensions after surgical correction of metopic synostosis.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed craniometric dimensions in older patients with metopic synostosis corrected by fronto-orbital advancement performed by the senior author (J.B.M.). Preoperative and postoperative linear measures (frontal breadth, cranial width, and intercanthal distance) were taken by direct anthropometry. Interdacryon distance and width of the bandeau were also recorded intraoperatively, before and after widening. Follow-up anthropometric values were compared to age- and sex-matched normative data and standard (z) scores were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Syndromic diagnosis was documented in five of 16 patients. Average age at the last postoperative evaluation was 8.9 ± 3.8 years (range, 4 to 16 years). Mean frontal width z-scores decreased postoperatively from 0.82 to -0.32 (p = 0.007), indicating diminished growth in this dimension. The last measured frontal width strongly correlated with the breadth of the bandeau after surgical correction but not with preoperative values. Postoperative mean cranial width diminished significantly to a more normal value. Mean intercanthal distance was normal preoperatively and remained so but was significantly greater in syndromic than in nonsyndromic cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Frontal growth rate is diminished in the coronal plane after fronto-orbital advancement. The authors recommend primary techniques to overcorrect the width of the bandeau and frontal region, including zygomaticosphenoid osteotomies and interpositional cranial bone grafts to advance/widen the lateral orbital rim. Continued evaluation is required to assess whether overcorrection results in normal frontotemporal shape and breadth at skeletal maturity.

Postoperative temporal hollowing: Is there a surgical approach that prevents this complication? A systematic review and anatomic illustration

BACKGROUND

Temporal hollowing is a common complication following surgical dissection in the temporal region. Our objectives were to: (1) review and clarify the temporal soft tissue relationships - supplemented by cadaveric dissection - to better understand surgical approach variations and elucidate potential etiologies of postoperative hollowing; (2) identify if there is any evidence to support a surgical approach that prevents hollowing through a systematic review.

METHODS

Cadaveric dissection was performed on six hemi-heads. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify surgical approaches with a decreased risk of postoperative hollowing.

RESULTS

A total of 1212 articles were reviewed; 19 of these met final inclusion criteria. Level I and II evidence supports against the use of a dissection plane beneath the superficial layer of the deep temporal fascia or through the intermediate temporal fat pad. Level II evidence supports preservation of the temporalis muscle origin - no evidence is available to support other temporalis resuspension techniques. For intracranial exposure, refraining from temporal fat pad dissection (Level I Evidence) and use of decreased access approaches such as the minipterional craniotomy (Level I Evidence) appear to minimize temporal soft tissue atrophy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the significance of preservation of the temporal soft tissue components to prevent hollowing. Preserving the temporalis origin and avoiding dissection between the leaflets of the deep temporal fascia or through the intermediate temporal fat pad appear to minimize this complication.

Complications after craniosynostosis surgery: comparison of the 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database and Pediatric NSQIP Database

OBJECT Research conducted using large administrative data sets has increased in recent decades, but reports on the fidelity and reliability of such data have been mixed. The goal of this project was to compare data from a large, administrative claims data set with a quality improvement registry in order to ascertain similarities and differences in content. METHODS Data on children younger than 12 months with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis who underwent surgery in 2012 were queried in both the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) and the American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (Peds NSQIP). Data from published clinical craniosynostosis surgery series are reported for comparison. RESULTS Among patients younger than 12 months of age, a total of 1765 admissions were identified in KID and 391 in Peds NSQIP in 2012. Only nonsyndromic patients were included. The mean length of stay was 3.2 days in KID and 4 days in Peds NSQIP. The rates of cardiac events (0.5% in KID, 0.3% in Peds NSQIP, and 0.4%-2.2% in the literature), stroke/intracranial bleeds (0.4% in KID, 0.5% in Peds NSQIP, and 0.3%-1.2% in the literature), infection (0.2% in KID, 0.8% in Peds NSQIP, and 0%-8% in the literature), wound disruption (0.2% in KID, 0.5% in Peds NSQIP, 0%-4% in the literature), and seizures (0.7% in KID, 0.8% in Peds NSQIP, 0%-0.8% in the literature) were low and similar between the 2 data sets. The reported rates of blood transfusion (36% in KID, 64% in Peds NSQIP, and 1.7%-100% in the literature) varied between the 2 data sets. CONCLUSIONS Both the KID and Peds NSQIP databases provide large samples of surgical patients, with more cases reported in KID. The rates of complications studied were similar between the 2 data sets, with the exception of blood transfusion events where the retrospective chart review process of Peds NSQIP captured almost double the rate reported in KID.

The metopic index: an anthropometric index for the quantitative assessment of trigonocephaly from metopic synostosis

OBJECTIVE Because the metopic suture normally fuses during infancy, there are varying degrees of severity in head shape abnormalities associated with premature fusion. A method for the objective and reproducible assessment of metopic synostosis is needed to guide management, as current methods are limited by their reliance on aesthetic markers. The object of this study was to describe the metopic index (MI), a simple anthropometric cranial measurement. The measurements can be obtained from CT scans and, more importantly, from palpable cranial landmarks, and the index provides a rapid tool for evaluating patients in both pre- and postoperative settings. METHODS High-resolution head CT scans obtained in 69 patients (age range 0-24 months) diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative 3D reconstructions were available in 15 cases, and these were compared with 3D reconstructions of 324 CT scans obtained in a control group of 316 infants (age range 0-24 months) who did not have any condition that might affect head size or shape and also in a subset of this group, comprising 112 patients precisely matched to the craniosynostosis patients with respect to age and sex. Postoperative scans were available and reviewed in 9 of the craniosynostosis patients at a mean time of 7.1 months after surgical repair. 3D reconstructions of these scans were matched with controls based upon age and sex. RESULTS The mean preoperative MI for patients with trigonocephaly was 0.48 (SD 0.05), significantly lower than the mean values of 0.57 (SD 0.04) calculated on the basis of all 324 scans obtained in controls (p < 0.001) and 0.58 (SD 0.04) for the subset of 112 age- and sex-matched controls (p < 0.001). For 7 patients with both pre- and postoperative CT scans available for evaluation, the mean postoperative MI was 0.55 (SD 0.03), significantly greater than their preoperative MIs (mean 0.48 [SD 0.04], p = 0.001) and comparable to the mean MI of the controls (p = 0.30). In 4 patients, clinically obtained postoperative MIs by caliper measurement were comparable to measurements derived from CT (p = 0.141). CONCLUSIONS The MI is a useful measurement of the severity of trigonocephaly in patients with metopic synostosis. This simple quantitative assessment can potentially be used in the clinical setting to guide preoperative evaluation, surgical repair, and postoperative degree of correction.

Neosuture formation after endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis repair

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to identify the rate of neosuture formation in patients with craniosynostosis treated with endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and investigate whether neosuture formation in sagittal craniosynostosis has an effect on postoperative calvarial shape. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed 166 cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis that underwent endoscope-assisted repair between 2006 and 2014. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative head CT scans were evaluated, and the rate of neosuture formation was calculated. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the CT data were used to measure cephalic index (CI) (ratio of head width and length) of patients with sagittal synostosis. Regression analysis was used to calculate significant differences between patients with and without neosuture accounting for age at surgery and preoperative CI. RESULTS Review of 96 patients revealed that some degree of neosuture development occurred in 23 patients (23.9%): 16 sagittal, 2 bilateral coronal, 4 unilateral coronal, and 1 lambdoid synostosis. Complete neosuture formation was seen in 14 of those 23 patients (9 of 16 sagittal, 1 of 2 bilateral coronal, 3 of 4 unilateral coronal, and 1 of 1 lambdoid). Mean pre- and postoperative CI in the complete sagittal neosuture group was 67.4% and 75.5%, respectively, and in the non-neosuture group was 69.8% and 74.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the CI between the neosuture and fused suture groups preoperatively or 17 months postoperatively in patients with sagittal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS Neosuture development can occur after endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and molding helmet therapy for patients with craniosynostosis. Although the authors did not detect a significant difference in calvarial shape postoperatively in the group with sagittal synostosis, the relevance of neosuture formation remains to be determined. Further studies are required to discover long-term outcomes comparing patients with and without neosuture formation.

Lambdoid Craniosynostosis: The Relationship with Chiari Deformations and an Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

A relationship between lambdoid craniosynostosis and Chiari deformations has been suggested, but the true extent of this association remains uncertain. The authors reviewed a single center's experience treating lambdoid synostosis to further elucidate this relationship, examine surgical outcomes, and identify associations that might impact future treatments.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients treated for lambdoid craniosynostosis, excluding the syndromic craniosynostoses. Operative data, scans, hospitalization, and subsequent surgical procedures were tracked. All patients were treated with remodeling procedures, but those with Chiari deformations underwent additional simultaneous suboccipital decompressions.

RESULTS

Over 22 years, 1006 nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients were treated, 45 of whom (4.5 percent) presented with lambdoid involvement: 25 single-suture and 20 multiple-suture (complex craniosynostosis). Magnetic resonance imaging revealed that 60 percent of children with unilateral synostosis and 71 percent with a complex synostosis had associated Chiari deformations. The mean surgical age was 12 months, and the average follow-up was 5.7 years: two patients developed syringomyelia requiring transcervical decompressions and two underwent secondary posterior remodeling procedures (one unilateral and one complex synostosis) while undergoing later Chiari decompressions. No patients treated with initial suboccipital decompressions have subsequently developed symptoms requiring treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of children with lambdoid synostosis develop Chiari deformations; therefore, routine preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging should be considered. The treatment of lambdoid craniosynostosis with cranial remodeling procedures, including incontinuity suboccipital decompressions when Chiari deformations were present, was associated with few complications. Ninety-six percent of those with isolated fusions were managed with a single procedure.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Pediatric neuroanesthesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A series of recent studies have changed the practice of pediatric neuroanesthesia, improving outcomes and making children's quality of life better.

RECENT FINDINGS

Potential long-term neurologic effects in infants and young children undergoing surgery and anesthesia have been recognized for over a decade. Several recent, well performed studies suggest that hypotension may also be a major contributor to postoperative neurologic impairment in children. Craniosynostosis surgery has also been the subject of extensive study, both related to decreasing blood loss and to optimizing postoperative outcomes.

SUMMARY

Although neurosurgical anesthesia research in the pediatric population can be ethically and logistically complex, resolving questions such as the optimal blood pressure during surgery and best management of infants undergoing repair of craniosynostosis will improve patient outcomes.

A critical evaluation of long-term aesthetic outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in nonsyndromic unicoronal craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

This study reports long-term aesthetic outcomes with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling in treating unicoronal synostosis over a 35-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed on patients with isolated unicoronal synostosis from 1977 to 2012. Demographic, preoperative phenotypic, and long-term aesthetic outcomes data were analyzed with chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis rank for continuous data.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were treated; 207 met inclusion criteria. None underwent secondary intervention for intracranial pressure. At definitive intervention, there 96 (55 percent) Whitaker class I patients, 11 (6 percent) class II, 62 (35 percent) class III, and six (3 percent) class IV. Nasal root deviation and occipital bossing each conferred an increased risk of Whitaker class III/IV [OR, 4.4 (1.4 to 13.9), p = 0.011; OR, 2.6 (1.0 to 6.8), p = 0.049]. Patients who underwent bilateral cranial vault remodeling with extended unilateral bandeau were less likely Whitaker class III/IV at latest follow-up compared with those undergoing strictly unilateral procedures [OR, 0.2 (0.1 to 0.7), p = 0.011]. Overcorrection resulted in decreased risk of temporal hollowing [OR, 0.3 (0.1 to 1.0), p = 0.05]. Patients with 5 years or more of follow-up were more likely to develop supraorbital retrusion [OR, 7.2 (2.2 to 23.4), p = 0.001] and temporal hollowing [OR, 3.7 (1.5 to 9.6), p = 0.006] and have Whitaker class III/IV outcomes [OR, 4.9 (1.8 to 12.8), p = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

Traditional fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling appears to mitigate risk of intracranial pressure but may lead to aesthetic shortcomings as patients mature, namely fronto-orbital retrusion and temporal hollowing.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.