Vascular Enhancement in Early Dynamic Liver MR Imaging in an Animal Model: Comparison of Two Injection Regimen and Two Different Doses Gd-EOB-DTPA (Gadoxetic Acid) With Standard Gd-DTPA

Timing of the hepatic arterial phase at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic dynamic MRI: comparison of the test-injection and the fixed-time delay method

PURPOSE

To compare the fixed-time- and the test-injection method with respect to the image quality of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the adequacy of timing of the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) in Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB) enhanced MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 63 patients with computed tomography (CT) -proven hypervascular HCC: 30 (group 1) were scanned HAP using the fixed-time delay method (protocol 1); in the other 33 (group 2), we applied the test-injection method (protocol 2). We compared the protocols with respect with tumor-to-liver contrast (TLC), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), and relative enhancement of the liver and tumor (REL , RET ) during HAP. Two radiologists compared the adequacy of HAP, image contrast, image noise, and overall image quality.

RESULTS

Under protocol 2, TLC, CNR, and REL and RET of hypervascular HCC were significantly higher (P < 0.01). The proportion of optimal HAP was significantly higher for protocol 2 than protocol 1 (P < 0.01). The visual score of the image contrast and the overall image quality were significantly higher in group 2 than group 1 (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

At EOB-enhanced hepatic dynamic MRI, the test-injection method yielded better image quality of hypervascular HCC and improved adequacy of timing of HAP.

Hypovascular nodules in patients with chronic liver disease: risk factors for development of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify patient characteristics and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings associated with subsequent hypervascularization in hypovascular nodules that show hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images in patients with chronic liver diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval was obtained, and informed consent was waived. At multiple follow-up gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging examinations of 68 patients, 160 hypovascular nodules were retrospectively reviewed. A Cox regression model for hypervascularization was developed to explore the association of baseline characteristics, including patient factors (Child-Pugh classification, etiology of liver disease, history of local therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and coexistence of hypervascular HCC) and MR imaging findings (fat content, signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and nodule size). In addition, the growth rate was calculated as the reciprocal of tumor volume doubling time to investigate its relationship with subsequent hypervascularization by using receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of subsequent hypervascularization was 31% (50 of 160 nodules). Independent Cox multivariable predictors of increased risk of hypervascularization were hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6, 20.8), previous local therapy for hypervascular HCC (HR = 5.0; 95% CI: 1.8, 13.6), Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (HR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.4, 9.5) and coexistence of hypervascular HCC (HR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0, 3.8). The mean growth rate was significantly higher in nodules that showed subsequent hypervascularization than in those without hypervascularization. Kaplan-Meier analysis based on the receiver operating characteristic cutoff level (1.8 × 10(-3)/day [tumor volume doubling time, 542 days]) showed that nodules with a higher growth rate had a significantly higher incidence of hypervascularization (P = 5.2 × 10(-8), log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Hyperintensity on T2-weighted images is an independent and strong risk factor at baseline for subsequent hypervascularization in hypovascular nodules in patients with chronic liver disease. Tumor volume doubling time of less than 542 days was associated with a high rate of subsequent hypervascularization.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with MR cholangiography for the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced biliary MRI with MR cholangiography (MRC) in the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer (BDC) staging and resectability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with BDC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced biliary MRI and MRC, were included in this study. Two abdominal radiologists evaluated the biliary MRI findings regarding the tumor extent, vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability. The results were compared with the surgical and pathology findings which were used as the standard reference. The diagnostic performance of the MRI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. In addition, to determine whether the hepatobiliary phase images had been successfully obtained, the enhancement percentage of the hepatic parenchyma was measured on the portal venous images (PVI) and hepatobiliary phase images (HBPI), respectively.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy of the two reviewers for determining the tumor resectability was 61.6% and 83.5%, respectively. The Az values were 0.802 for reviewer 1 and 0.892 for reviewer 2 in the evaluation of the secondary biliary confluence tumor involvement and 0.773 for reviewer 1 and 0.846 for reviewer 2 in the evaluation of the intrapancreatic bile duct involvement. In the evaluation of the vascular involvement, the Az values were 0.718 and 0.906, respectively, for the hepatic artery evaluation and 0.55 and 0.88, respectively, for the portal vein evaluation. For assessment of lymph node metastasis, the overall accuracy was 69.6% and 79.7%, respectively. The mean enhancement percentages of hepatic parenchyma on PVI and HBPI were 39.3% and 65.9%, respectively (P % 0.05), and 49 of 73 patients (67.1%) showed higher enhancement percentage on HBPI than on PVI CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with MRC is a reliable diagnostic method for assessing the tumor extent and resectability of BDC.

Reduction of ringing artifacts in the arterial phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging

PURPOSE

We assessed what MR imaging parameters affected ringing artifacts during the arterial phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested various parameters, including imaging matrices, choice of either sequential or elliptical centric phase-encoding scheme, scanning time, and contrast injection rate using new simulation software on a personal computer and visually evaluated clinical MR images retrospectively using a 4-point scale to assess ringing artifacts.

RESULTS

The simulation study revealed that square matrices, short scanning time, slow injection rate, and sequential view ordering effectively reduced ringing artifacts, findings confirmed in clinical practice using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Significantly fewer artifacts resulted using a slow injection rate (P<0.05) and using square matrices in the arterial (P<0.05), portal (P<0.01), and hepatocytic (P<0.05) phases.

CONCLUSION

Choice of square matrix, slower injection rate, shorter scanning time, and sequential view ordering could reduce ringing artifacts.

Liver MRI at 3.0 tesla: comparison of image quality and lesion detectability between single-source conventional and dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmissions

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively and intraindividually compare liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using single-source and dual-source parallel radiofrequency (RF) transmissions at 3.0-T for image quality, lesion detectability, and lesion contrast.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with 139 liver lesions underwent liver MRI at 3.0-T. Two radiologists performed a consensus review of T2-weighted images (T2WI), heavily T2WI (HT2WI), gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary images, and diffusion-weighted imaging using single-source and dual-source RF transmissions with regard to image quality and lesion detectability. Contrast ratios between liver lesions and liver parenchyma were also calculated.

RESULTS

Image quality was better with dual-source than with single-source at T2WI and HT2WI (P < 0.05), but lesion detectabilities were similar for all sequences. There was no significant difference in mean contrast ratios for all sequences (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Dual-source RF transmission provides a better image quality with T2WI and HT2WI than with single-source. However, 2 techniques showed similar lesion detectability.

Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality

PURPOSE

To determine whether acute transient dyspnea and/or arterial phase image degradation occurs more or less often after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium than with intravenous administration of gadobenate dimeglumine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained for this prospective observational study. One hundred ninety-eight gadolinium-based contrast media administrations (99 with gadoxetate disodium [10 mL, n = 97; 8 mL, n = 1; 16 mL, n = 1] and 99 with gadobenate dimeglumine [0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight, maximum dose, 20 mL]) for hepatobiliary indications were assessed in 192 patients. Subjective patient complaints were assessed. Objective respiratory motion degradation on T1-weighted precontrast and dynamic postcontrast (arterial, venous, or late dynamic or extracellular) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets were independently assessed in a randomized, blinded fashion by five readers using a five-point scale, with mean scores of 4 or greater indicating severe motion. Comparisons between agents were made by using χ(2) or Fisher exact test, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Significantly more patient complaints of acute transient dyspnea occurred after gadoxetate disodium administration than gadobenate dimeglumine (14% [14 of 99] vs 5% [five of 99], P = .05). There were significantly more severely degraded arterial phase data sets for gadoxetate disodium than for gadobenate dimeglumine for both the general population (17% [17 of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P = .0007) and the subpopulation with cirrhosis (19% [14 of 72] vs 3% [one of 37], P = .02). This effect did not extend to venous (1% [one of 99] vs 2% [two of 99], P > .99 [overall population]) or late dynamic or extracellular (2% [two of 99] vs 0% [zero of 99], P = .5 [overall population]) phases. No patient required treatment for self-limited dyspnea.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous gadoxetate disodium can result in acute self-limiting dyspnea that can have a deleterious effect on arterial phase MR image quality and occurs significantly more often than with intravenous gadobenate dimeglumine.

Time-intensity curve in the abdominal aorta on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with high temporal and spatial resolution: Gd-EOB-DTPA versus Gd-DTPA in vivo

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the time-intensity curves (TICs) of the abdominal aorta on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) between Gd-DTPA and Gd-EOB-DTPA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers underwent DCE-MRI three times with the following protocol: group A, Gd-DTPA at an injection rate of 3 ml/s; group B, Gd-EOB-DTPA, 3 ml/s; group C, Gd-EOB-DTPA, 1.5 ml/s. Signal intensities (SIs) of the abdominal aorta were measured, and the contrast enhancement ratio (CER) was calculated. Time-to-CER curves were compared among the three groups. The differences in maximum CER (CERmax) and time-to-peak of CER were analyzed.

RESULTS

The time-to-CER curve showed a double peak pattern in group A and single-peak pattern in groups B and C. The mean time between the first and the second peak was 6.2 s. The mean CERmax of each group was 4.50, 4.52 and 4.27, respectively. In group A, B and C, the mean time-to-peak was 14.6, 10.6 and 12.6 s, respectively. There was a significant difference between group A and B (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

To set up the optimal protocol for abdominal DCE-MRI, it should be noted that TIC in the Gd-DTPA and Gd-EOB-DTPA group showed different patterns, and a slower injection rate showed a less abrupt SI change in the Gd-EOB-DTPA group than in the Gd-DTPA group.

Imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe the imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and to determine whether it results in improved tumour conspicuity of cholangiocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with histologically proven intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma underwent MRI of the liver using a 1.5T MR-scanner with Gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA; Eovist/Primovist, Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany). The standard imaging protocol included a T2w multi-shot TSE sequence with fat saturation (fs), a T2w single shot sequence without fs and a T1w 3D GRE sequences with fs (unenhanced and arterial, portovenous, late venous and hepatobiliary phase). Two board certified radiologists experienced in liver MRI (5 and 10 years experience) evaluated retrospectively all MRI scans qualitatively and quantitatively. Signal was measured with region-of-interests (ROI) and signal-to-noise (SNR) as well as contrast-to-noise (CNR) was calculated. Statistical significance was tested with an ANOVA and a pairwise Wilcoxon rank test.

RESULTS

All intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas presented as hypointense lesions in the late venous and hepatobiliary phase. Images in the hepatobiliary phase showed the highest lesion conspicuity, i.e. n=9 blurred (16.6%), n=31 moderate (57.4%) and n=14 sharp (26%). This was significantly higher than the lesion conspicuity of all other sequences or phases. Furthermore, the CNR was the highest in this sequence with 76.8±51.3, with significantly higher values than the CNR of the unenhanced T1w sequence (CNR: 35.6±21.0; p<0.0001) and the arterial phase images (CNR: 53.6±36.8; p<0.001). The hepatobiliary phase images showed a SNR of 97.3±59.7 (p<0.001) and thus was significantly different from the unenhanced T1w sequence (SNR: 60.4±35.3; p<0.001), whereas the increase in SNR from the late venous to hepatobiliary phase was neglectable, indicating that no liver-specific contrast uptake is present in cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presents as a hypointense lesion in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in late venous phase images. The lesion conspicuity as well as CNR was highest in the hepatobiliary phase. Consequently, hepatobiliary phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI images might be helpful for therapy planning due to the exact depiction of the tumour borders.

Optimization of the dynamic, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of the liver: the effect of the injection rate

BACKGROUND

Tissue-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents such as Gd-BOPTA, Gd-EOB-DTPA are increasingly used for liver imaging. Despite the added value of the hepatobiliary phase a proper arterial phase is still critical, especially in patients with chronic liver diseases. So far, there are limited data in the literature about the effect of the injection speed of Gd-EOB-DTPA in liver and vessel enhancement.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of injection rate on the enhancement of liver parenchyma and vasculature in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI (1.5T multi-channel MR-system) were retrospectively evaluated. We used a Care Bolus technique with an injection rate of 2 mL/s in group 1 (n = 40) and a Care Bolus technique with an injection rate of 1 mL/s in group 2 (n = 40) to determine the start of the arterial-dominant phase. Signal intensities were measured in vascular structures and liver parenchyma. Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), SNR increase (SNRi), and percentage enhancement (PE) were calculated and compared by a students t-test.

RESULTS

The SNR, SNRi, and PE of the aorta in the arterial phase were significantly higher in group 2 in comparison to group 1 (P = 0.007, P = 0.0043, and P < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences concerning the SNR, SNRi, or PE of the portal vein and the normal liver parenchyma between both groups at all time points.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that a lower injection rate of 1 mL/s enables a higher enhancement in the aorta in the arterial phase compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with the more commonly used injection rate of 2 mL/s.

Contrast agents as a biological marker in magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: conventional and new approaches

Liver imaging is an important clinical area in everyday practice. The clinical meaning of different lesion types in the liver can be quite different. Therefore, the result of imaging studies of the liver can change therapeutic concepts fundamentally. Contrast agents are used in the majority of MR examinations of the liver parenchyma-despite the already good soft-tissue contrast in plain MRI. This can be explained by the advantages in lesion detection and characterization of contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver. Beyond the qualitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced liver MR examinations, quantification of parameters will be the demand of the future. This can be achieved by perfusion MRI, also called dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the liver. Its basic principles and different clinical applications will be discussed in this article. Definite cut-off values to determine disease or therapeutic response will help to increase the objectivity and reliability of liver MRI in future. This is especially important in the oncological setting, where modern therapies cannot be assessed based on changes in size only.

Primovist, Eovist: what to expect?

Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl dimeglumine (Gd-EOB-DTPA, Primovist in Europe and Eovist in the USA) is a liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent that has up to 50% hepatobiliary excretion in the normal liver. After intravenous injection, Gd-EOB-DTPA distributes into the vascular and extravascular spaces during the arterial, portal venous and late dynamic phases, and progressively into the hepatocytes and bile ducts during the hepatobiliary phase. The hepatocyte uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA mainly occurs via the organic anion transporter polypeptides OATP1B1 and B3 located at the sinusoidal membrane and biliary excretion via the multidrug resistance-associated proteins MRP2 at the canalicular membrane. Because of these characteristics, Gd-EOB-DTPA behaves similarly to non-specific gadolinium chelates during the dynamic phases, and adds substantial information during the hepatobiliary phase, improving the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions and diffuse liver disease. This information is particularly relevant for the detection of metastases, and for the detection and characterization of nodular lesions in liver cirrhosis, including early hepatocellular carcinomas. Finally, GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging may provide quantitative assessment regarding liver perfusion and hepatocyte function in diffuse liver diseases. The full potential of GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has to be established further. It is already clear that GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging provides anatomic and functional information in the setting of focal and diffuse liver disease that is unattainable with magnetic resonance imaging enhanced with non-specific contrast agents.

Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of diffusion-weighted and of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging alone or in combination in the detection of small liver metastasis (≤ 1.5 cm in diameter)

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of combined gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with each imaging approach alone for detecting small hepatic metastases (≤ 1.5 cm).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived informed patient consent. Eighty-six patients with 179 liver metastases underwent liver MRI including unenhanced and gadoxetic acid-enhanced imaging and DWI at 3.0 T. Three image sets including unenhanced images-gadoxetic acid set (early dynamic and hepatocyte phase), DWI set, and the combined set-were analyzed independently and in consensus by 2 observers for detecting liver metastases using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

There was a tendency toward an increased diagnostic accuracy for the combined set (mean, 0.965) compared with that for each image set alone (mean, 0.911 for gadoxetic acid set; 0.926 for DWI set). The combined set showed better sensitivity (mean, 97.47%/95.0%: values on per-lesion/per-patient basis) than each imaging set alone (mean, 90.7%/83.7% for gadoxetic acid set; 91.6%/83.0% for DWI set) (P < 0.05) on both per-lesion basis and per-patient basis. All image sets showed similar positive predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and DWI yielded better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in the detection of small liver metastasis than each magnetic resonance scan sequence alone.

Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents

The advent of gadolinium-based "hepatobiliary" contrast agents offers new opportunities for diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and has triggered great interest for innovative imaging approaches to the liver and bile ducts. In this review article we discuss the imaging properties of the two gadolinium-based hepatobiliary contrast agents currently available in the U.S., gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid, as well as important pharmacokinetic differences that affect their diagnostic performance. We review potential applications, protocol optimization strategies, as well as diagnostic pitfalls. A variety of illustrative case examples will be used to demonstrate the role of these agents in detection and characterization of liver lesions as well as for imaging the biliary system. Changes in MR protocols geared toward optimizing workflow and imaging quality are also discussed. It is our aim that the information provided in this article will facilitate the optimal utilization of these agents and will stimulate the reader's pursuit of new applications for future benefit.

MRI of Focal Liver Lesions

Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI has more advantages than ultrasound, computed tomography, CT, positron emission tomography, PET, or any other imaging modality in diagnosing focal hepatic masses. With a combination of basic T1 and T2 weighted sequences, diffusion weighted imaging, DWI, and hepatobiliary gadolinium contrast agents, that is gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) and gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB), most liver lesions can be adequately diagnosed. Benign lesions, as cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, FNH or adenoma, can be distinguished from malignant lesions. In a non-cirrhotic liver, the most common malignant lesions are metastases which may be hypovascular or hypervascular. In the cirrhotic liver hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, is of considerable importance. Besides, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and other less common malignancies has to be assessed. In this review, the techniques and typical MRI features are presented as well as the new algorithm issued by American Association for the Study of the Liver Diseases (AASLD).

Contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB·Primovist®) for low-field magnetic resonance imaging of canine focal liver lesions

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a new liver-specific contrast agent gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA; EOB·Primovist®) was studied in 14 normal beagles and 9 dogs with focal liver lesions. Gd-EOB-DTPA accumulates in normally functioning hepatocytes 20 min after injection. As with Gd-DTPA, it is also possible to perform a dynamic multiphasic examination of the liver with Gd-EOB-DTPA, including an arterial phase and a portal venous phase. First, a reliable protocol was developed and the appropriate timings for the dynamic study and the parenchymal phase in normal dogs using Gd-EOB-DTPA were determined. Second, the patterns of these images were evaluated in patient dogs with hepatic masses. The optimal time of arterial imaging was from 15 s after injection, and the optimal time for portal venous imaging was from 40 s after injection. Meanwhile, the optimal time to observe changes during the hepatobiliary phase was from 20 min after injection. In patient dogs, 11 lesions were diagnosed as malignant tumors; all were hypointense to the surrounding normal liver parenchyma during the hepatobiliary phase. Even with a low-field MR imaging unit, the sequences afforded images adequate to visualize the liver parenchyma and to detect tumors within an appropriate scan time. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA provides good demarcation on low-field MR imaging for diagnosing canine focal liver lesions.

Different signal intensity at Gd-EOB-DTPA compared with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma transgenic mouse model in delayed phase hepatobiliary imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate hyperintense Gd-DTPA- compared with hyper- and hypointense Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnet resonance imaging (MRI) in c-myc/TGFα transgenic mice for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty HCC-bearing transgenic mice with overexpression of the protooncogene c-myc and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α) were analyzed. MRI was performed using a 3-T MRI scanner and an MRI coil. The imaging protocol included Gd-DTPA- and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted images. The statistically evaluated parameters are signal intensity (SI), signal intensity ratio (SIR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), percentage enhancement (PE), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

RESULTS

On Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI compared with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, the SI of liver was 265.02 to 573.02 and of HCC 350.84 to either hyperintense with 757.1 or hypointense with 372.55 enhancement. Evaluated parameters were SNR of HCC 50.1 to 56.5/111.5 and SNR of liver parenchyma 37.8 to 85.8, SIR 1.32 to 1.31/0.64, CNR 12.2 to 26.1/-30.08 and PE 42.08% to 80.5/-98.2%, (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA is superior to Gd-DTPA for detecting HCC in contrast agent-enhanced MRI in the c-myc/TGFα transgenic mouse model and there was no difference between the hyperintense or hypointense appearance of HCC. Either way, HCCs can easily be distinguished from liver parenchyma in mice.

A simple way to acquire T(1)-weighted MR images of rat liver with respiratory triggering

To acquire high-resolution T(1)-weighted images of the liver in rats, for which breath-holding cannot be ensured, respiratory triggering is essential. At the respiratory rate of 30-60 times/min in rats, however, T(1)-weighted images cannot be obtained with simple triggering. As a simple solution to this, we applied multiple repeated acquisitions with one trigger signal. With this technique, sufficient T(1) contrast could be easily achieved in rat liver enhanced by gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid infusion.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) on a 3-T system and integrated contrast-enhanced F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CE-PET/CT) for the detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

: The approval from the institutional review board was obtained, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We retrospectively evaluated 135 metastases in 68 patients (37 men, 31 women; mean age: 68 years; age range: 37-82 years) who underwent both EOB-MRI and CE-PET/CT. A total of 103 metastases were confirmed during surgery and 32 were confirmed by imaging findings during follow-up. The images were independently reviewed by 2 observers. The diagnostic accuracies of EOB-MRI and CE-PET/CT were determined by calculating the areas under each reader-specific receiver operating characteristic curve (Az). Patient-based lesion sensitivity and specificity were compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

: The mean area under the Az on EOB-MRI versus CE-PET/CT was 0.94 versus 0.81 for all lesions (P < 0.001), 0.92 versus 0.60 for lesions ≤1 cm in size (P < 0.001), and 0.88 versus 0.96 for lesions >1 cm (P = 0.098), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive value on a patient basis were 100%, 71%, 97%, and 100% for EOB-MRI and 93%, 71%, 97%, and 57% for CE-PET/CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

: EOB-MRI using a 3-T system is more accurate than CE-PET/CT, especially for the detection of small (≤1.0 cm) lesions. Patient-based analysis revealed that EOB-MRI has a higher sensitivity and negative predictive value than CE-PET/CT.

Small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI and multiphasic 64-multirow detector CT

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using 3.0 T with that of multiphasic 64-multirow detector CT (MDCT) for the detection of small (≤2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients (44 men, 10 women; age range, 33-81 years) with 59 HCCs (≤2 cm in diameter) who underwent both multiphasic (arterial, portal venous, equilibrium) 64-MDCT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI were enrolled in this study. Two observers independently and randomly reviewed the MR and CT images on a lesion-by-lesion basis. The diagnostic performance of these techniques for the detection of HCC was assessed by alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, in addition to evaluating the sensitivity and positive predictive value.

RESULTS

For each observer, the areas under the ROC curve were 0.874 and 0.863 for MRI, respectively, as opposed to 0.660 and 0.687 for CT, respectively. The differences between the two techniques were statistically significant for each observer (p<0.001). The sensitivities (89.8% and 86.4%) of MRI for both observers were significantly higher than those (57.6% and 61.0% for each observer, respectively) of MDCT. No significant difference was seen between the positive predictive values for the two techniques (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3.0 T MRI shows a better diagnostic performance than that of 64-MDCT for the detection of small (≤2 cm) HCCs in patients with chronic liver disease.

Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions: approach to imaging diagnosis

This article is a review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of incidental focal liver lesions. This review provides an overview of liver MRI protocol, diffusion-weighted imaging, and contrast agents. Additionally, the most commonly encountered benign and malignant lesions are discussed with emphasis on imaging appearance and the diagnostic performance of MRI based on a review of the literature.

Advances in diagnostic radiology

Recent advances in diagnostic radiology are discussed on the basis of current publications in Investigative Radiology. Publications in the journal during 2009 and 2010 are reviewed, evaluating developments by modality and anatomic region. Technological advances continue to play a major role in the evolution and clinical practice of diagnostic radiology, and as such constitute a major publication focus. In the past 2 years, this includes advances in both magnetic resonance and computed tomography (in particular, the advent of dual energy computed tomography). An additional major focus of publications concerns contrast media, and in particular continuing research involving nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, its etiology, and differentiation of the gadolinium chelates on the basis of in vivo stability.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis patients

OBJECTIVES

To develop a non-invasive MRI method for evaluation of liver fibrosis, with histological analysis as the reference standard.

METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Studies of our hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Seventy-nine subjects who received dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA were divided into three subgroups according to Metavir score: no fibrosis (n = 30), mild fibrosis (n = 34), and advanced fibrosis (n = 15). The DCE-MRI parameters were measured using two models: (1) dual-input single-compartment model for arterial blood flow (F (a)), portal venous blood flow, total liver blood flow, arterial fraction (ART), distribution volume, and mean transit time; and (2) curve analysis model for Peak, Slope, and AUC. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Slope and AUC were two best perfusion parameters to predict the severity of liver fibrosis (>F2 vs. ≦F2). Four significantly different variables were found between non-fibrotic versus mild-fibrotic subgroups: F (a), ART, Slope, and AUC; the best predictor for mild fibrosis was F (a) (AUROC:0.701).

CONCLUSIONS

DCE-MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA is a noninvasive imaging, by which multiple perfusion parameters can be measured to evaluate the severity of liver fibrosis.

Detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: intraindividual comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at 3.0 and 1.5 T

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 T for the detection of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and compare with that at 1.5 T.

MATERIALS

Forty patients with 54 HCCs (size range: 0.6-2.0 cm) underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at both 1.5 and 3.0 T with 3 to 8 days interval. The MRIs were compared quantitatively by measuring tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively by evaluating tumor-liver contrast using matched pairs analysis. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were also evaluated by the consensus readings of 2 reviewers using the alternative-free response receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method.

RESULTS

Although the tumor-liver contrast-to-noise ratio for the arterial phase was significantly higher at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (30.2 ± 21.4 vs. 35.2 ± 22.9; P = 0.04), we found similar values for the hepatocyte phase (38.2 ± 24.6 vs. 38.4 ± 25.3; P = 0.762). Matched pairs analysis indicated that the relative tumor-liver contrast was better in 7 and 9 lesions in the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase at 3.0 T, respectively, than those at 1.5 T. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of 3.0-T imaging [Az, 0.988; 92.6% (n = 50)] were slightly higher than those of 1.5-T imaging [Az, 0.981; 88.9% (n = 48)], but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.487).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRIs at 1.5 and 3.0 T showed similar diagnostic performances for detecting small HCCs. However, there was a tendency toward increased reader confidence for the arterial phase and hepatocyte phase with 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T.

Characterization of hyperintense nodules on precontrast T1-weighted MRI: utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte-phase imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte-phase magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterization of T1-weighted hyperintense nodules within cirrhotic liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Thirty-four nodules hyperintense in unenhanced T1-weighted MRI with histopathological confirmation from a collection of 19 patients were included. Tumor size, signal intensity on T1-weighted, and T2-weighted imaging as well as enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced dynamic/hepatocyte-phase imaging were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of hepatocyte-phase imaging.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the nodules with standard of reference revealed 15 dysplastic nodules (DN), seven well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (wHCC), and 12 moderately differentiated HCCs (mHCC). The mean size of dysplastic nodules was smaller than that of HCCs (P < 0.001). Using the HCC criteria (T2W or arterial enhancement followed with portal venous washout), 11/19 HCC were correctly characterized. Using solely hypointensity (compared to the surrounding liver parenchyma) during the hepatocyte phase as the criterion, 18/19 HCC were correctly characterized. There were seven additional HCCs diagnosed with hepatocyte-phase imaging (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with hepatocyte-phase imaging is superior to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with conventional criteria alone in characterization of T1W hyperintense nodules.

Outcome of hypovascular hepatic nodules revealing no gadoxetic acid uptake in patients with chronic liver disease

PURPOSE

To elucidate the natural history of hypovascular nodules that appear hypointense on hepatocyte-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images by focusing on hypervascularization over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 135 hypovascular nodules revealing no gadoxetic acid uptake in 53 patients were examined. All nodules were retrospectively examined using serial follow-up computed tomography (CT) and MRI examinations until hypervascularity was observed on arterial-phase dynamic CT or gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images, or on CT during hepatic arteriography. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between hypervascularization and MR findings including a presence of fat assessed by a signal drop on opposed-phase T1-weighted images.

RESULTS

Of the 135 nodules, 16 underwent hypervascularization. The size of the nodules and the presence of fat in the nodules were independent indicators of hypervascularization. The 1-year cumulative risk of hypervascularization was 15.6%. This risk was significantly increased in the case of nodules >10 mm (37.6%, P < 0.01) and fat-containing nodules (26.5%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Hypovascular nodules that appear hypointense on hepatocyte-phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images may progress to conventional hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Nodules more than 10 mm in diameter and containing fat are at high risk for developing hypervascularization.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: sequence optimization and artifacts

The liver is one of the most challenging organs of the body to image with magnetic resonance because it is large and mobile, receives a dual blood supply, and is surrounded by organs and structures that contribute to artifacts from flow and susceptibility. Recent advances in imaging hardware, in addition to improvements in temporal resolution and development of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, make imaging of the liver more approachable than in the past; however, it remains a complex process that requires compromise. In this article the authors discuss development and optimization of a liver imaging protocol at 1.5 T, with common variations in each element of the protocol, as well as the strengths and weaknesses associated with the relevant sequences.

Detection of liver malignancy with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: is addition of diffusion-weighted MRI beneficial?

AIM

To determine the additive value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for the detection of hepatic metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients with 38 liver metastases and 18 HCCs were included in this study. Ten patients also had hemangiomas (n = 3) or cysts (n = 8). Liver MRI consisted of pre-contrast and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MRIs (arterial, portal, 2-min delay, 20 min hepatocyte-selective phases), a post-contrast T2-weighted image, and post-contrast DWI (b values: 0, 50, 600 s/mm²). Two observers independently analyzed the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with and without DWI. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for the detection of liver lesions were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Although there were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for detecting metastases and HCCs between the gadoxetic acid set alone and the combined DWI and gadoxetic acid set for both observers (mean Az, 0.974 vs 0.987), we found the sensitivity for detecting metastases to be significantly higher with the combined images (97.4%) than with the gadoxetic acid set alone (89.5%) for observer 1 (p = 0.008). Three and two metastases for each observer were clearly verified by adding DWI to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. However, sensitivities for both image sets were equivalent in detecting HCCs.

CONCLUSION

The addition of DWI to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI has the potential to increase sensitivity for the detection of liver metastases. However, for detecting HCC, we found no additive value of DWI to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Can MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection provide appropriate arterial phase images with reducing artifacts on gadoxetic acid-DTPA (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced hepatic MR imaging?

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether using MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection improves the quality of arterial phase images in gadoxetic acid-DTPA-enhanced (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MR imaging because of proper acquisition timing and reduction of artifacts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred sixteen patients undergoing examination for liver diseases were retrospectively reviewed. All MR images were obtained with two Gd-EOB-DTPA injection protocols: (i) a combination protocol, in which the MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection (1 mL/s) were used; and for comparison, (ii) a conventional protocol, in which adjusted fixed scan delay and ordinary rate injection (2 mL/s) were adopted. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma on arterial phase images were calculated. Two blinded readers independently evaluated the obtained arterial phase images in terms of acquisition timing and degree of artifacts.

RESULTS

The SNRs of aorta and portal vein on arterial phase images were significantly higher in the combination protocol group (aorta/portal: 221.9 +/- 91.9/197.1 +/- 89.8) than that in the conventional protocol group (aorta/portal: 169.8 +/- 97.4/92.7 +/- 48.5) (P < 0.05). The acquisition timing for arterial phase images with the combination protocol was significantly better than that with the conventional protocol (P < 0.01). The image quality of the combination protocol was significantly higher than that of the conventional protocol (P < 0.01). The occurrence rate of moderate or severe degree of artifacts in the conventional protocol (38.0%) was more prominent than that in the combination protocol (18.5%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of the MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slow rate injection provides proper arterial phase images and reduces the artifacts in Gd-EOB-DTPA MR imaging.

Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis: differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI findings of hepatic hemangioma and to investigate the diagnostic performance in differentiating hepatic hemangioma and metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of 32 hepatic hemangiomas in 25 patients and of 29 hepatic metastatic lesions in 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Two independent readers interpreted hepatobiliary phase images alone, dynamic extracellular phase images alone, and combined hepatobiliary and dynamic extracellular phase images. MRI findings and performance with respect to the differential diagnosis of hemangioma and metastasis were assessed.

RESULTS

During the hepatic arterial phase, 11 of the 32 hemangiomas (34%) exhibited early total enhancement, and nine (28%) exhibited peripheral nodular enhancement. A bright dot sign or minimal peripheral enhancement during the late dynamic phase was observed for a small number of lesions (6% and 28%, respectively). Twenty-three of the 29 metastatic lesions (79%) exhibited ring enhancement during the hepatic arterial phase. Twenty-nine hemangiomas (91%) and all of the metastatic lesions exhibited homogeneous or heterogeneous hypointensity during the hepatobiliary phase. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the detection of hemangioma were 76%, 81%, and 0.87 for the hepatobiliary phase alone; 97%, 88%, and 0.97 for the dynamic extracellular phase alone; and 97%, 88%, and 0.98 for the combination. Five nodules smaller than 1 cm (four hemangiomas, one metastatic lesion) that exhibited no enhancement during the arterial phase and minimal enhancement during the late dynamic phase were not differentiated.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI was found useful for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas and metastatic lesions, especially during the dynamic extracellular phase. Only a limited number of lesions smaller than 1 cm in diameter, which exhibited minimal enhancement on late dynamic phase images, were difficult to diagnose.

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: The feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid for evaluating the ablative margin

AIM

  The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the ablative margin of radiofrequency (RF) ablation to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

  RF ablation was performed in the livers of six pigs after the i.v. administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA 20 min before ablation. Three pigs were killed 2 h after administration (group A), and the other pigs were killed 7 days after ablation (group B). Thereafter, correlation between pathological findings and MRI was investigated. Moreover, the Gd concentrations were examined in ablated and non-ablated regions. An initial clinical evaluation was conducted for 28 HCC nodules. Percutaneous RF ablation was performed 20 min after administration, and T(1)-weighted images were taken 2, 24 and 72 h post-treatment.

RESULTS

  On T(1)-weighted images of the porcine liver, the RF ablated lesions showed hyperintense regions with hypointense rims, which histopathologically corresponded to sinusoidal congestion. The Gd concentrations in ablated regions in group A were significantly higher than those in non-ablated regions, while the concentrations in both regions in group B fell to nearly undetectable levels. In 27 of the 28 HCC nodules, the treated area consisted of a hypointense region, indicative of the tumor, and a surrounding hyperintense rim 2 h after ablation. Subsequently, a thin hypointense region was observed in the outermost layer 24 and 72 h after ablation.

CONCLUSION

  Administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA in conjunction with RF ablation of HCC may be feasible for the assessment of an accurate ablative margin.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging--correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features

PURPOSE

To analyze the correlation between signal intensity in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and the expression of hepatocyte transporters with histopathologic features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Forty surgically resected HCCs were classified as hypointense (n = 32) or iso- or hyperintense (n = 8) on the basis of findings in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. The following were compared between hypointense and iso- or hyperintense HCCs: the time-signal intensity curves at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, the expression levels of seven transporters (four organic anion-transporting polypeptides [OATPs] and three multidrug-resistant proteins [MRPs]) at polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (for 22 nodules), results of immunostaining of OATP8, and histologic features. Statistical analysis (unpaired t test, Mann-Whitney test, chi(2) test, and Fisher exact test) was performed for each result.

RESULTS

On the time-signal intensity curves, hypointense HCCs showed a decreasing pattern, whereas iso- or hyperintense HCCs showed an increasing pattern after the dynamic phase. PCR revealed that expression of OATP8 (an uptake transporter) in hypointense HCCs was lower and that in iso- or hyperintense HCCs was higher than in background liver (P < .001). The expression level of MRP3 (a sinusoidal export transporter) showed a similar trend to that of OATP8 (P < .001). Immunostaining revealed that OATP8 expression was weak in hypointense HCCs, whereas it was sustained in iso- or hyperintense HCCs (P < .001). At histologic examination, a pseudoglandular proliferation pattern with bile plugs was more commonly observed in iso- or hyperintense HCCs than in hypointense HCCs (P = .01 for proliferation patterns and P = .006 for bile plugs).

CONCLUSION

The enhancement ratio of HCCs in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging positively correlated with expression levels of OATP8 and MRP3, indicating that gadoxetic acid is taken up by OATP8 and excreted by MRP3.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA), to describe a workflow-optimized pulse sequence protocol, and to illustrate the imaging appearance of focal lesions in the noncirrhotic liver.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA allows a comprehensive evaluation of the liver with the acquisition of both dynamic and hepatocyte phase images. This provides potential additional information, especially for the detection and characterization of small liver lesions. However, protocol optimization is necessary for improved image quality and workflow.

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined unenhanced and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with unenhanced MR imaging and triphasic contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) for the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at each of the 15 centers involved in the study, and informed written consent was given by all patients. In total, 178 patients with suspected focal hepatic lesions (based, in most patients, on CT, tumor marker and ultrasound examinations) underwent combined MR imaging with a single, rapid injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA 0.025 mmol/kg, including T1-weighted dynamic and delayed MR images 20 to 40 minutes postinjection. Triphasic contrast-enhanced CT, the comparator examination, was performed within 4 weeks of MR imaging. Standard of references (SOR) were resection histopathology and intraoperative ultrasonography, or combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography; in cases where, although the major lesions were treated, some lesion(s) were not treated, follow-up superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging was additionally performed. All images were assessed for differences in lesion detection and characterization (specific lesion type) by on-site readers and 3, blinded (off-site) reviewers. All adverse events (AEs) occurring within 72 hours after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration were reported.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.6% of patients who received Gd-EOB-DTPA reported 21 drug-related AEs. A total of 151 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Combined MR imaging showed statistically higher sensitivity in lesion detection (67.5%-79.5%) than unenhanced MR imaging (46.5%-59.1%; P < 0.05 for all). Combined MR imaging also showed higher sensitivity in lesion detection than CT (61.1%-73.0%), with the results being statistically significant (P < 0.05) for on-site readers and 2 of 3 blinded readers. Higher sensitivity in lesion detection with combined MR imaging compared with CT was also clearly demonstrated in the following subgroups: lesions with a diameter <or=20 mm (lesions <or=10 mm: 38.0%-55.4% vs. 26.1%-47.3%, respectively; lesions 10-20 mm: 71.1%-87.3% vs. 65.7%-78.4%, respectively); in cirrhotic patients (64.5%-75.4% vs. 54.5%-70.3%, respectively); and in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (66.6%-78.6% vs. 59.1%-71.6%, respectively). Combined MR imaging demonstrated a higher proportion of correctly characterized lesions (50.5%-72.1%) than unenhanced MR imaging (30.2%-50.0%; P < 0.05 for all), whereas there were no significant differences compared with CT (49.0%-68.1%), except for one blinded reader (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this study, hepatocyte-specific Gd-EOB-DTPA was shown to be safe and to improve the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions compared with unenhanced MR imaging. When compared with spiral CT, Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI seems to be beneficial especially for the detection for smaller lesions or hepatocellular carcinoma underlying cirrhotic liver.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (< or =2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging

OBJECTIVES

To determine the characteristic enhancing features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and arterial-enhancing pseudolesion (AEP) on gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess its performance compared with that of multirow detector computed tomography (MDCT) for differentiating small HCC (< or =2 cm in diameter) from AEP in cirrhotic liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 69 patients with 97 small, arterial enhancing hepatic lesions (0.5-2 cm in diameter), ie, 44 HCCs and 53 AEPs, detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, were included in this study. HCCs were diagnosed either through histopathology confirmation (n = 16) or by a combination of liver computed tomography (CT), angiographic findings, lipiodol CT, and AFP levels (n = 28). AEPs were diagnosed either through histopathology confirmation (n = 2) or were based on the angiographic findings, liver CT, and follow-up imaging (n = 51). Two radiologists jointly analyzed the morphologic features and the enhancement characteristics on the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Of the 69 study patients, 42 patients with 60 arterial enhancing lesions underwent quadruple-phase CT in addition to their MRI examination within 4 weeks before or after the MRI, and 2 other radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis independently reviewed the MRI and CT images in random order, at an interval of 2 weeks. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics. The Kappa test was used to evaluate interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

Among 44 HCCs, 42 (95.4%) demonstrated low signal intensity (SI) and only 2 showed iso- or high SI on the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Alternatively, most AEPs showed iso SI on the hepatobiliary (n = 50, 94.3%) phase, and only 2 AEPs showed low SI. Compared with the diagnostic performance of the 2 imaging modalities, the mean areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curves on MR imaging were 0.975 for reviewer 1 and 0.966 for reviewer 2, whereas those of CT imaging were 0.892 for reviewer 1 and 0.888 for reviewer 2 (P = 0.069 and P = 0.106, respectively). The sensitivity for each reviewer with MR imaging (93.9% and 90.9%, respectively) was significantly higher than that with multiphasic CT (54.5%, in both) (P = 0.001 and 0.0018, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HCCs and AEPs show different enhancing features on the delayed dynamic and hepatobiliary phases of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may, therefore, help to differentiate between HCC and AEP.