Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not improved by extending resections to achieve negative margins

Frozen Section Interpretation of Pancreatic Margins: Subspecialized Gastrointestinal Pathologists Versus General Pathologists

Intraoperative assessment of pancreatic parenchymal margin during pancreatectomies is challenging and misinterpretation by the pathologist is a cause of incorrect frozen section (FS) diagnosis. Although the current literature supports that pancreatic margin FS diagnosis and its accuracy has no impact on the patient outcome for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients and reexcision in an attempt to achieve a negative intraoperative pancreatic margin after positive FS is not associated with increased overall survival; still it remains a routine practice in many institutions. To this end, we sought to assess the interobserver variation and accuracy of FS diagnosis between subspecialized gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary (GI) and general pathologists. Seventy seven consecutive pancreatic parenchymal margin FSs performed on pancreatectomies for PDAC from 2010 to 2013 were retrieved at our institution. These were retrospectively evaluated by 2 GI and 2 general pathologists independently without knowledge of the original FS diagnosis or the final diagnosis. The specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of GI versus general pathologist was 97.8% versus 87.5%, 61.1% versus 66.7%, 78.6% versus 41.4%, 95% versus 95.2%, and 93.5% versus 85.1%, respectively. The interobserver agreement between GI and general pathologists was fair (κ = .337, P < .001). The interobserver agreement between 2 GI pathologists was fair (κ = .373, P = .0005) and between 2 general pathologists was slight (κ = .195, P = .042). Although overall accuracy of subspecialized GI pathologists was higher than that of general pathologists, none had an accuracy of 100%. Our study reaffirms the challenging nature of these FSs.

Artery first approach to pancreatoduodenectomy: current status

BACKGROUND

The need for an early determination of resectability and before an irreversible step is taken during pancreatoduodenectomy promoted the development of an 'artery first approach' (AFA). The aim of this study was to review the current evidence related to this approach, with particular reference to margins and survival.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 1960 to 2015 using both subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all published related articles to this topic.

RESULTS

Six different AFAs have been published. Four studies evaluated the impact of AFA on perioperative outcomes and survival. Three studies showed no difference in the perioperative outcomes, margin status, lymph node yield and survival while one study showed improved margin status and survival comparing AFA with standard resection.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence regarding the benefits of AFA in relation to decreasing margin positivity or increasing survival is sparse. Further larger studies and randomized controlled trails are needed to ascertain the benefits of AFA.

A preoperative serum signature of CEA+/CA125+/CA19-9 ≥ 1000 U/mL indicates poor outcome to pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatectomy is associated with significant morbidity and unpredictable outcome, with few diagnostic tools to determine, which patients gain the most benefit from this treatment, especially before the operation. This study aimed to define a preoperative signature panel of serum markers to indicate response to pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Over 1000 patients with pancreatic cancer treated at two independent high-volume institutions were included in this study and were divided into three groups, including resected, locally advanced and metastatic. Eight serum tumor markers most commonly used in gastrointestinal cancers were analyzed for patient outcome. Preoperative CA19-9 independently indicated surgical response in pancreatic cancer. Patients with CA19-9 ≥1000 U/mL generally had a poor surgical benefit. However, a subset of these patients still achieved a survival advantage when CA19-9 levels decreased postoperatively. CEA and CA125 in the presence of CA19-9 ≥1000 U/mL could independently predict the non-decrease of CA19-9 postoperatively. The combination of the three markers was useful for predicting a worse surgical outcome with a median survival of 5.1 months vs. 23.0 months (p < 0.001) for the training cohort and 7.0 months vs. 18.2 months (p < 0.001) for the validation cohort and also suggested a higher prevalence of early distant metastasis after surgery. Resected patients with this proposed signature showed no survival advantage over patients in the locally advanced group who did not receive pancreatectomy. Therefore, a preoperative serum signature of CEA(+)/CA125(+)/CA19-9 ≥1000 U/mL is associated with poor surgical outcome and can be used to select appropriate patients with pancreatic cancer for pancreatectomy.

Surgical management of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic uncinate process in a cancer hospital in egypt

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic carcinoma affecting the uncinate process is a challenging surgical condition. Several considerations affect the management plan, including the need for vascular resection and the ability to achieve a clear margin.

METHODS

The data of 19 patients who had curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process were reviewed. Operative mortality and morbidity, and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

RESULTS

The study population included 13 male and 6 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. Nine patients (47.4%) had stage I disease, seven patients (36.8%) had stage II disease, and three patients (15.8%) had stage III disease. A total of 12 patients had Whipple procedure and 7 patients had total pancreatectomy. In total, there were 9 R0 and 10 R1 resections. Operative mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19), postoperative leakage rate was 21.1% (4/19), and wound sepsis rate was 21.1%. Median DFS was 19.2 months. Survival was superior in the Whipple procedure group than in the total pancreatectomy group (median survival 19 months vs 4 months, respectively). Vascular resection and retroperitoneal safety margin status did not affect disease relapse.

CONCLUSION

Non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process should be offered R0 or R1 resection whenever technically feasible.

Surgical management of pancreatic cancer--pancreaticoduodenectomy

Pancreaticoduodenectomy, the Whipple resection, is a complex operation that is commonly performed for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and other malignant or benign lesions in the head of the pancreas. It can be done with low morbidity and mortality rates, particularly when performed at high-volume hospitals and by high-volume surgeons. While it has been conventionally reserved for patients with early-stage malignant disease, it is being used increasingly for patients with locally extensive tumors who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy and downstaging. This article summarizes the role of pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. It highlights the surgical staging of disease, the technical aspects of the operation and perioperative care, and the oncologic outcome.

Value of intraoperative neck margin analysis during Whipple for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a multicenter analysis of 1399 patients

INTRODUCTION

During pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for ductal adenocarcinoma, a frozen section (FS) neck margin is typically assessed, and if positive, additional pancreas is removed to achieve an R0 margin. We analyzed the association of this practice with improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from January 2000 to August 2012 at 8 academic centers were classified by neck margin status as negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) on the basis of FS and permanent section (PS). Impact on OS of converting an FS-R1-neck margin to a PS-R0-neck margin by additional resection was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1399 patients had FS neck margins analyzed. Median OS was 19.7 months. On FS, 152 patients (10.9%) were R1, and an additional 51 patients (3.6%) had false-negative FS-R0 margins. PS-R0-neck was achieved in 1196 patients (85.5%), 131 patients (9.3%) remained PS-R1, and 72 patients (5.1%) were converted from FS-R1-to-PS-R0 by additional resection. Median OS for PS-R0-neck patients was 21.1 months versus 13.7 months for PS-R1-neck patients (P < 0.001) and 11.9 months for FS-R1-to-PS-R0 patients (P < 0.001). Both FS-R1-to-PS-R0 and PS-R1-neck patients had larger tumors (P = 0.001), more perineural invasion (P = 0.02), and more node positivity (P = 0.08) than PS-R0-neck patients. On multivariate analysis controlling for adverse pathologic factors, FS-R1-to-PS-R0 conversion remained associated with significantly worse OS compared with PS-R0-neck patients (hazard ratio: 1.55; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, additional resection to achieve a negative neck margin after positive frozen section is not associated with improved OS.

Current and future intraoperative imaging strategies to increase radical resection rates in pancreatic cancer surgery

Prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer is poor. Even the small minority that undergoes resection with curative intent has low 5-year survival rates. This may partly be explained by the high number of irradical resections, which results in local recurrence and impaired overall survival. Currently, ultrasonography is used during surgery for resectability assessment and frozen-section analysis is used for assessment of resection margins in order to decrease the number of irradical resections. The introduction of minimal invasive techniques in pancreatic surgery has deprived surgeons from direct tactile information. To improve intraoperative assessment of pancreatic tumor extension, enhanced or novel intraoperative imaging technologies accurately visualizing and delineating cancer cells are necessary. Emerging modalities are intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence imaging and freehand nuclear imaging using tumor-specific targeted contrast agents. In this review, we performed a meta-analysis of the literature on laparoscopic ultrasonography and we summarized and discussed current and future intraoperative imaging modalities and their potential for improved tumor demarcation during pancreatic surgery.

Frozen section of the pancreatic neck margin in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is of limited utility

The use of frozen section to assess resection margins intraoperatively during pancreaticoduodenectomy facilitates further resection. However, it is unclear whether this actually improves patient survival.We reviewed the overall survival and resection margin status in consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies performed for carcinoma. An R1 resection was defined as an incomplete excision (≤1 mm margin); R0(p) resection as complete excision without re-resection and R0(s) resection as an initially positive neck margin which was converted to R0 resection after re-resection. Between 2007 and 2012, 116 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed for adenocarcinoma; 101 (87%) underwent frozen section of the neck margin which was positive in 19 (19%). Sixteen of these patients had negative neck margins after re-excision but only seven patients had no other involved margins [true R0(s) resections]. Median survival for the R0(p), R0(s) and R1 groups were 29, 16, 23 months, respectively (p = 0.049; R0(p) versus R0(s) p = 0.040). Intra-operative frozen section increased the overall R0 rate by 7% but this did not improve survival. Our findings question the clinical benefit of intraoperative margin assessment, particularly if re-excision cannot be performed easily and safely.

Is arterial infiltration still a criterion for unresectability in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

As surgical resection remains the only hope for cure in pancreatic cancer (PC), more aggressive surgical approaches have been advocated to increase resection rates. Venous resection demonstrated to be a feasible technique in experienced centers, increasing survival. In contrast, arterial resection is still an issue of debate, continuing to be considered a general contraindication to resection. In the last years there have been significant advances in surgical techniques and postoperative management which have dramatically reduced mortality and morbidity of major pancreatic resections. Furthermore, advances in multimodal neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments, as well as the better understanding of tumor biology and new diagnostic options have increased overall survival. In this article we highlight some of the important points that a modern pancreatic surgeon should take into account in the management of PC with arterial involvement in light of the recent advances.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high mortality rate. Proper determination of the extent of disease on imaging studies at the time of staging is one of the most important steps in optimal patient management. Given the variability in expertise and definition of disease extent among different practitioners as well as frequent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed. A consensus statement describing a standardized reporting template authored by a multi-institutional group of experts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that included radiologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons was developed under the joint sponsorship of the Society of Abdominal Radiologists and the American Pancreatic Association. Adoption of this standardized imaging reporting template should improve the decision-making process for the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by providing a complete, pertinent, and accurate reporting of disease staging to optimize treatment recommendations that can be offered to the patient. Standardization can also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using appropriate and consistent staging by means of resectability status, thus allowing for comparison of results among different institutions.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high mortality rate. Proper determination of the extent of disease on imaging studies at the time of staging is one of the most important steps in optimal patient management. Given the variability in expertise and definition of disease extent among different practitioners as well as frequent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed. A consensus statement describing a standardized reporting template authored by a multi-institutional group of experts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that included radiologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons was developed under the joint sponsorship of the Society of Abdominal Radiologists and the American Pancreatic Association. Adoption of this standardized imaging reporting template should improve the decision-making process for the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by providing a complete, pertinent, and accurate reporting of disease staging to optimize treatment recommendations that can be offered to the patient. Standardization can also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using appropriate and consistent staging by means of resectability status, thus allowing for comparison of results among different institutions.

Margin status, recurrence pattern, and prognosis after resection of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists as to whether positive operative margins are an independent prognostic factor for resected pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the impact of the resection margin status on the patterns of recurrence and prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A total of 208 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent resection with curative intent were studied retrospectively. All patients underwent pancreatectomy (164 pancreatoduodenectomies, 42 distal pancreatectomies, and 2 total pancreatectomies) intended to achieve R0 resection. They were divided into three groups on the basis of the following margin status: R(>1 mm), R(0-1 mm), and R(0 mm). The postoperative survival and recurrence patterns were evaluated in relation to the margin status. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the factors influencing the overall survival.

RESULTS

The resection margin was R(>1 mm) in 134 patients (65%), R(0-1 mm) in 40 (19%), and R(0 mm) in 34 patients (16%). The margin status correlated with the rate of local recurrence; 8% in R(>1 mm), 20% in R(0-1 mm), and 50% in R(0 mm) patients. In contrast, the incidence of recurrence at other sites, such as the lymph nodes, peritoneum, liver and other distant organs, were almost identical among the three groups. The median survival time was 26 months in R(>1 mm), 30 months in R(0-1 mm), and 23 months in R(0 mm) patients (P = not significant). The multivariate analyses revealed that lymph node metastases and poor differentiation were correlated with poor survival.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of pancreatectomy, when we evaluated the definitions of R0 resection, the margin status influenced the local recurrence rate but had no impact on the patients' survival.

Genetic and molecular alterations in pancreatic cancer: implications for personalized medicine

Recent advances in human genomics and biotechnologies have profound impacts on medical research and clinical practice. Individual genomic information, including DNA sequences and gene expression profiles, can be used for prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment for many complex diseases. Personalized medicine attempts to tailor medical care to individual patients by incorporating their genomic information. In a case of pancreatic cancer, the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States, alteration in many genes as well as molecular profiles in blood, pancreas tissue, and pancreas juice has recently been discovered to be closely associated with tumorigenesis or prognosis of the cancer. This review aims to summarize recent advances of important genes, proteins, and microRNAs that play a critical role in the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer, and to provide implications for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer.

Planned versus unplanned portal vein resections during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The management of portal vein (PV) involvement by pancreatic adenocarcinoma during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of unplanned and planned PV resections as part of PD.

METHODS

An analysis of PD over 11 years was performed. Patients who had undergone PV resection (PV-PD) were identified, and categorized into those who had undergone planned or unplanned resection. Postoperative and oncological outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of 249 patients who underwent PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 66 (26·5 per cent) had PV-PD, including 27 (41 per cent) planned and 39 (59 per cent) unplanned PV resections. Twenty-five of 27 planned PV resections were circumferential PV-PD, whereas 25 of 39 unplanned PV resections were partial PV-PD. Planned PV resections were performed in slightly younger patients (mean(s.d.) 60(9) versus 65(10) years; P = 0·031), and associated with longer operating times (mean(s.d.) 602(131) versus 458(83) min; P < 0·001) and more major complications (26 versus 5 per cent; P = 0·026). Planned PV resections were associated with a lower rate of positive margins (4 versus 44 per cent; P < 0·001) despite being carried out for larger tumours (mean(s.d.) 3·9(1·4) versus 2·9(1·0) cm; P = 0·002). There was no difference in survival between the two groups (P = 0·998). On multivariable analysis, margin status was a significant predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

Although planned PV resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were associated with higher rates of postoperative morbidity than unplanned resections, R0 resection rates were better.

Is it time to stop checking frozen section neck margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy?

BACKGROUND

Residual disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) adversely impacts survival. The value of taking additional neck margin after a positive frozen section (FS) to achieve a negative margin remains uncertain.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PD for PDAC from January 2000 August 2012 were identified and classified as negative (R0) or positive (R1) based on final neck margin. We examined factors for association with a positive FS neck margin and overall survival (OS). We assessed the value of converting an R1 neck margin to R0 via additional parenchymal resection.

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients had FS neck margin analysis, of which 53 (14 %) were positive. Positive FS neck margin was associated with decreased OS (11.1 vs. 17.3 months, p = 0.01) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis poor histologic grade (p = 0.007), increased tumor size (p = 0.003), and a positive retroperitoneal margin (p = 0.009) were independently associated with decreased OS, but positive FS neck margin was not. Of the 53 patients with positive FS, 41 underwent additional neck resection and 23 were converted to R0. On permanent section, R0 neck margin was achieved in 322 patients (84 %), R1 in 37 patients (10 %), and R1 converted to R0 in 23 patients (6 %). Both the converted and the R1 groups had significantly poorer OS than the R0 group (11.3 vs. 11.1 vs. 17.3 months respectively; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive FS margin at the pancreatic neck during PD for PDAC is associated with poor survival. Extending the neck resection after a positive FS to achieve R0 margin status does not appear to improve OS.

Immunotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are the most common human tumors encountered worldwide. The majority of GI cancers are unresectable at the time of diagnosis, and in the subset of patients undergoing resection, few are cured. There is only a modest improvement in survival with the addition of modalities such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Due to an increasing global cancer burden, it is imperative to integrate alternative strategies to improve outcomes. It is well known that cancers possess diverse strategies to evade immune detection and destruction. This has led to the incorporation of various immunotherapeutic strategies, which enable reprogramming of the immune system to allow effective recognition and killing of GI tumors.

METHODS

A review was conducted of the results of published clinical trials employing immunotherapy for esophageal, gastroesophageal, gastric, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers.

RESULTS

Monoclonal antibody therapy has come to the forefront in the past decade for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Immunotherapeutic successes in solid cancers such as melanoma and prostate cancer have led to the active investigation of immunotherapy for GI malignancies, with some promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, monoclonal antibody therapy is the only immunotherapy approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for GI cancers. Initial trials validating new immunotherapeutic approaches, including vaccination-based and adoptive cell therapy strategies, for GI malignancies have demonstrated safety and the induction of antitumor immune responses. Therefore, immunotherapy is at the forefront of neoadjuvant as well as adjuvant therapies for the treatment and eradication of GI malignancies.

Is there a 'margin' for error in pancreatic cancer surgery?

Evaluation of: Gnerlich JL, Luka SR, Deshpande AD et al. Microscopic margins and patterns of treatment failure in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Arch. Surg. 147(8), 753-760 (2012). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease with one of the worst 5-year survival rates of any malignancy. Even after potentially curative surgical resection, disease may progress rapidly. It is therefore important to identify clinicopathologic factors that influence survival and may be modified to improve outcomes. The evaluated article presents data from a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical resection for PDAC. Local recurrence (LR), distant recurrence and survival were compared between patients with a negative resection margin (R0) and those with a positive resection margin (R1). Patients with R1 posterior margins, in particular, were more likely to have LR and worse LR-free survival. In addition, this was more pronounced if patients had lymph-node involvement. Similar results have been reported in other studies and this study illustrates that standardized pathological reporting of PDAC specimens may allow further investigation of factors affecting R1 patients.

Dendritic cell immunotherapy combined with gemcitabine chemotherapy enhances survival in a murine model of pancreatic carcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is an extremely aggressive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice have multiple immunoregulatory subsets including regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) that may limit the effectiveness of anti-tumor immunotherapies for pancreatic cancer. It is possible that modulating these subsets will enhance anti-tumor immunity. The goal of this study was to explore depletion of immunoregulatory cells to enhance dendritic cell (DC)-based cancer immunotherapy in a murine model of pancreatic cancer. Flow cytometry results showed an increase in both Tregs and MDSC in untreated pancreatic cancer-bearing mice compared with control. Elimination of Tregs alone or in combination with DC-based vaccination had no effect on pancreatic tumor growth or survival. Gemcitabine (Gem) is a chemotherapeutic drug routinely used for the treatment for pancreatic cancer patients. Treatment with Gem led to a significant decrease in MDSC percentages in the spleens of tumor-bearing mice, but did not enhance overall survival. However, combination therapy with DC vaccination followed by Gem treatment led to a significant delay in tumor growth and improved survival in pancreatic cancer-bearing mice. Increased MDSC were measured in the peripheral blood of patients with pancreatic cancer. Treatment with Gem also led to a decrease of this population in pancreatic cancer patients, suggesting that combination therapy with DC-based cancer vaccination and Gem may lead to improved treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer.

An anatomical-based mapping analysis of the pancreaticoduodenectomy retroperitoneal margin highlights the urgent need for standardized assessment

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of a pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen by pathologists requires specialized knowledge of anatomy. Standardized assessment, description and documentation of the retroperitoneal margin are crucial for the accurate interpretation of studies evaluating adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer patients.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinomas had their pathological specimens examined prospectively, using an anatomical-based mapping approach. All margins, including the bile duct, pancreatic neck, superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein and posterior surface of the uncinate process, were microscopically examined in their entirety. The assessment of an R1 margin in terms of distance was assessed in two ways: first defining it as a tumour at the margin or secondary as tumour within 1 mm (1 mm rule).

RESULTS

If the existing College of American Pathologists recommendations were applied (assessing only the bile duct, pancreatic neck and superior mesenteric artery margins), a R1 status would be achieved in only 9 of 25 patients. Extending the examination by assessment and reporting of the entire retroperitoneal resection margin, including the Superior Mesenteric Vein margin and the Posterior surface of the uncinate process margin, increased the number of patients with a R1 resection to 14 out of 25. Applying the 1-mm rule further increased the number of patient with a R1 resection to 20 of 25 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The above findings illustrate that different approaches to the assessment and reporting of the retroperitoneal margin can change the results and adversely affect the final statistics used in pancreatic cancer studies and clinical trials.

Tumor infiltration in the medial resection margin predicts survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Microscopic tumor involvement (R1) in different surgical resection margins after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been debated.

METHODS

Clinico-pathological data for 258 patients who underwent PD between 2001 and 2010 were retrieved from a prospective database. The rates of R1 resection in the circumferential resection margin (pancreatic transection, medial, posterior, and anterior surfaces) and their prognostic influence on survival were assessed.

RESULTS

For PDAC, the R1 rate was 57.1% (48/84) for any margin, 31.0% (26/84) for anterior surface, 42.9% (36/84) for posterior surface, 29.8% (25/84) for medial margin, and 7.1% (3/84) for pancreatic transection margin. Overall and disease-free survival for R1 resections were significantly worse than those for R0 resection (17.2 vs. 28.7 months, P = 0.007 and 12.3 vs. 21.0 months, P = 0.019, respectively). For individual margins, only medial positivity had a significant impact on survival (13.8 vs. 28.0 months, P < 0.001), as opposed to involvement in the anterior (19.7 vs. 23.3 months, P = 0.187) or posterior margin (17.5 vs. 24.2 months, P = 0.104). Multivariate analysis demonstrated R0 medial margin was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002, HR = 0.381; 95% CI 0.207-0.701).

CONCLUSION

The medial surgical resection margin is the most important after PD for PDAC, and an R1 resection here predicts poor survival.

Palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to clarify the role of a palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy in both pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Survival outcomes were compared between resections and bypass operations, and between curative (R0) and palliative resections, with a microscopically (R1) and a grossly (R2) positive resection margin.

RESULTS

There were 595 surgical patients, including 207 undergoing bypass operations and 388 undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomies, with 47.4% curative resections (R0) and 17.8% palliative resections (R1 + R2). The overall positive margin rate after a pancreaticoduodenectomy was 27.3% (R1 = 8.0%, R2 = 19.3%). For periampullary adenocarcinomas, there was a significant survival difference between the R0, palliative, and no resection groups. However, there was no significant survival difference between the R0 and palliative resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Note that the survival outcome after either a curative or a palliative pancreaticoduodenectomy was still better than the survival outcome of a bypass operation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a survival benefit after a pancreaticoduodenectomy regardless of the resection margin or primary origin of the periampullary adenocarcinoma, as compared with a bypass operation. The resection margin after a pancreaticoduodenectomy did not play a role in the survival outcome in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Therefore, we recommend that pancreaticoduodenectomies should be attempted whenever possible.

Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

PURPOSE

According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), R1 is defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the surface of the resection margin (RM). In contrast, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) suggested to declare R1 already when tumor cells are found within 1 mm of the RM. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the RM concerning the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2009, 62 patients underwent a curative operation for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The relevance of R status on cumulative overall survival (OS) was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis for both the classic R classification (UICC) and the suggestion of the RCP.

RESULTS

Following the UICC criteria, a positive RM was detected in 8 %. Along with grading and lymph node ratio, R status revealed a significant impact on OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Applying the suggestion of the RCP, R1 rate rose to 26 % resulting in no significant impact on OS in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that the RCP suggestion for R status has no impact on the prognosis of PDAC. In contrast, our data confirmed the UICC R classification of RM as well as N category, grading, and lymph node ratio as significant prognostic factors.

Multi-institutional analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrating the effect of diabetes status on survival after resection

BACKGROUND

The effect of diabetes on survival after resection pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. The present study was undertaken to determine whether pre-operative diabetes has any predictive value for survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review from seven centres was performed. Metabolic factors, tumour characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing resection for PDAC were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to determine factors associated with disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of the 509 patients in the present study, 31.2% had diabetes. Scoring systems were devised to predict OS and DFS based on a training set (n= 245) and were subsequently tested on an independent set (n= 264). Pre-operative diabetes (P < 0.001), tumour size >2 cm (P= 0.001), metastatic nodal ratio >0.1 (P < 0.001) and R1 margin (P < 0.001) all correlated with DFS and OS on univariate analysis. Scoring systems were devised based on multivariable analysis of the above factors. Diabetes and the metastatic nodal ratio were the most important factors in each system, earning two points for OS and four points for DFS. These scoring systems significantly correlated with both DFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative diabetes status provides useful information that can help to stratify patients in terms of predicted post-operative OS and DFS.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: complete tumor extirpation improves survival benefit despite larger tumors for patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma have poor survival. Presumably, tumors in the body or tail of the pancreas, due to paucity of symptoms, present later than patients with tumors in the head of the pancreas. This study was undertaken to determine if tumors amenable to complete extirpation by distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy have worse survival when compared to their proximal counterparts.

METHODS

Since 1992, patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been prospectively followed. The impact of resection was evaluated using a survival curve analysis (Mantel-Cox). Data are presented as median, mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 33 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Comparing overall survival, there was not a significant difference between patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (16.8 months, 25.6 ± 26) and distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy (15.2 months, 19.7 ± 18.6), p = 0.34. Patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy had significantly larger tumors (4 cm, 5 ± 2.3) compared to patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (3 cm, 3 ± 1.4), p = 0.005.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is poor despite the location within the pancreas. Complete tumor extirpation continues to be an independent predictor of survival, regardless of operation undertaken, despite larger tumors for patients who undergo distal pancreatectomy/splenectomy.

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: rationale for multidisciplinary treatment

BACKGROUND

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) appears to be most frequently related to a positive surgical margin and has a poor prognosis after resection. However, few reports are available on differences in tumor characteristics and prognoses among resectable pancreatic cancer (PC), BRPC, and unresectable PC.

METHODS

Records of 133 patients resected for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and 185 patients treated as locally advanced PC (LAPC) were reviewed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients who initially underwent resection (BRPC-s) and 10 patients who were initially treated as LAPC (BRPC-n) met the criteria for BRPC. Prognosis of BRPC was significantly better than that of unresectable PC, but was significantly worse than that of resectable PC. BRPC-s showed more frequent nerve plexus invasion (P < 0.01), portal vein invasion (P < 0.01), and loco-regional recurrence (P = 0.03) than resectable PC. The positive surgical margin rate was not significantly higher in BRPC-s (29%) than in resectable PC (19%) (P = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

BRPC had a poorer prognosis with more local failure than resectable PC although prognosis of BRPC was significantly better than that of unresectable PC. Considering the tumor and treatment characteristics, multidisciplinary treatment including resection is required for BRPC.

Recent advances and limitations of surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer

Recent advances in surgical treatment for pancreatic cancer have been remarkable. Pancreatoduodenectomy is a standard surgical procedure for cancer of the pancreatic head, and is now indicated even for elderly patients over 80 years of age. Pancreatoduodenectomy with combined resection of the peripancreatic vessels has improved survival, but extended resection including lymph nodes is considered to have no extra survival benefit. Furthermore, laparoscopic resection procedures including pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, enucleation and central pancreatectomy can now be performed safely. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine may further improve the surgical outcome. An understanding of the oncological aspects of pancreatic cancer and the development of surgical techniques and chemotherapy may further contribute to improving the outcome of surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic head resectable adenocarcinoma: preoperative chemoradiation improves local control but does not affect survival

BACKGROUND

This study assesses the impact of preoperative chemoradiation on recurrence, surgical morbidity, histopathological data and survival in resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study with an intention-to-treat analysis. From 1997 to 2006, 173 patients with resectable pancreas head carcinoma were treated in two reference centres in France using different treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven of 85 (79%) patients in the surgery-first (SF) group and 38 of 88 (43%) patients in the chemoradiation (CR) group underwent surgical resection (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity was 40% (15/38) in the CR group and 43% (29/67) in the SF group (P= 0.837). In the CR group, median tumour size was smaller (1.5 cm vs. 3.0 cm; P < 0.001) and fewer patients were node-positive (29% vs. 64%; P= 0.001) than in the SF group. There was less perineural (43% vs. 93%; P < 0.001), lymphatic and vascular (21% vs. 92%; P < 0.001) invasion in the CR group than in the SF group. In both groups, 89% of patients had recurrence (31/35 in the CR group and 57/64 in the SF group; P= 1.000), predominantly involving metastasis and carcinomatosis in the CR group (30/31 vs. 35/57; P < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence in the SF group (24/57 vs. 3/31; P= 0.002). Median survival for all patients and for resected patients in the CR and SF groups was, respectively, 15 months vs. 17 months, and 21 months vs. 18 months (P= non-significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemoradiation allows for good local control of the disease but does not increase survival, mainly for reasons of metastatic spread. Other options should be developed to improve both local and distant control of the disease.

Pancreatic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize published research on pancreatic surgery over the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improvements in the treatment of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis with regards to the timing of ERCP and cholecystectomy as well as management of pancreatic pseudocysts have been reported. It is often difficult to detect malignancy in neoplastic pancreatic cysts; however, a detailed cyst fluid analysis for protein and genetic markers may improve this accuracy. In order to continue to improve pancreatic cancer care in the United States, a standardized reporting system must be developed, and this was a focus of the American Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Association Consensus Conference on Resectable and Borderline Resectable Disease. The conference examined pretreatment assessment, surgical treatment, and combined modality treatment for pancreatic cancer. A multi-institutional randomized clinical trial revealed that routine preoperative decompression of malignant biliary obstruction is associated with a higher frequency of complications. Pancreatic fistulas are the most common source of perioperative morbidity following pancreatic surgery. Fortunately, most of these can be managed nonoperatively via interventional radiology techniques.

SUMMARY

There is a broad spectrum of pancreatic diseases, which often require surgical treatment. Fortunately, the morbidity and mortality from each of them continues to decrease with more accurate diagnosis, improved management techniques, and standardized reporting systems.

TNFalpha gene delivery therapy for solid tumors

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Multimodality therapy, including adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is now the mainstay of treatment for the majority of non-hematologic cancers. Host toxicity can, however, be significant, which may contribute to local and/or systemic failures. Novel adjunctive treatments that can limit systemic exposure while synergizing with standard therapy hold promise in the fight against an increasing number of cancers.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We discuss a TNFalpha gene delivery system used to generate high levels of intratumoral TNFalpha, while limiting systemic exposure. The delivery system utilizes a replication-deficient adenoviral vector. When injected intratumorally and activated by external beam radiation, infected cells synthesize and locally secrete large amounts of TNFalpha.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review will provide the reader with a thorough understanding of the gene-based TNFalpha delivery system with special emphasis on product characteristics, mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The TNFalpha gene delivery system holds promise as an adjunctive agent for improved local control and increasing resectability rates for many solid tumors. The completion of several ongoing randomized trials will help to better define the role for TNFalpha gene delivery therapy in the treatment of solid tumors.

Palliation in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is rarely curable, and because of its location causes significant symptoms for patients in need of palliation. The common problems of incurable pancreatic cancer are biliary obstruction, duodenal obstruction, and pain. Approaches include surgical, endoscopic and radiologic interventions. This article discusses the palliative options and controversies related to these symptoms.

Outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery

The increase in surgery for pancreatic cancer during the last 3 decades can be correlated with a gradual decline in operative mortality and postoperative complications. Although not all surgeons (nor all hospitals) can have equal outcomes, the definition and tabulation of these outcomes have been difficult. This article asks several pertinent questions: (1) what is the scientific rationale for pancreatic resection? (2) what are the best available results at this time? (3) who should be performing pancreatic resections? The article analyzes results of resection for adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas, and excludes duodenal and ampullary cancers, pancreatic endocrine tumors, and tumors of less malignant potential.