Novel oral anticoagulants and trauma: The results of a prospective American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trial

The novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have worse outcomes compared with warfarin in patients with intracranial hemorrhage after TBI

INTRODUCTION

Novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) use is increasing in trauma patients. The reversal of these agents after hemorrhage is still evolving. The aim of our study was to evaluate outcomes after traumatic brain injury in patients on NOACs.

METHODS

3-year (2014-2016) analysis of our prospectively maintained traumatic brain injury (TBI) database. We included all TBI patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on anticoagulants. Patients were stratified into two groups, those on NOACs and on warfarin, and were matched in a 1:2 ratio using propensity score matching for demographics, injury and vital parameters, type, and size of ICH. Outcome measures were progression of ICH, mortality, skilled nursing facility (SNF) disposition, and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 1,459 TBI patients, of which 210 patients were matched (NAOCs, 70; warfarin, 140). Matched groups were similar in age (p = 0.21), mechanism of injury (p = 0.61), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p = 0.54), Injury Severity Score (p = 0.62), and type and size of ICH (p = 0.09). Patients on preinjury NOACs had higher rate of progression (p = 0.03), neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.04), mortality (p = 0.04), and longer ICU LOS (p = 0.04) compared with patients on warfarin. However, there was no difference in hospital LOS (p = 0.22) and SNF disposition (p = 0.14). On sub-analysis of severe TBI patients (GCS ≤ 8), rate of progression (p = 0.59), neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.62), or mortality (p = 0.81) was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NOACs generally carries a high risk of bleeding and can be detrimental in head injuries with ICH. NOAC use is associated with increased risk of progression of ICH, neurosurgical intervention, and mortality after a mild and moderate TBI. Primary care physicians and cardiologists need to reconsider the data on the need for anticoagulation and the type of agent used and weigh it against the risk of bleeding. In addition, development of reversal agents for the NOACs and implementation of a strict protocol for the reversal of these agents may lead to improved outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic studies, level III.

The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition

BACKGROUND

Severe traumatic injury continues to present challenges to healthcare systems around the world, and post-traumatic bleeding remains a leading cause of potentially preventable death among injured patients. Now in its fifth edition, this document aims to provide guidance on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following traumatic injury and encourages adaptation of the guiding principles described here to individual institutional circumstances and resources.

METHODS

The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was founded in 2004, and the current author group included representatives of six relevant European professional societies. The group applied a structured, evidence-based consensus approach to address scientific queries that served as the basis for each recommendation and supporting rationale. Expert opinion and current clinical practice were also considered, particularly in areas in which randomised clinical trials have not or cannot be performed. Existing recommendations were re-examined and revised based on scientific evidence that has emerged since the previous edition and observed shifts in clinical practice. New recommendations were formulated to reflect current clinical concerns and areas in which new research data have been generated.

RESULTS

Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of post-traumatic coagulopathy have supported improved management strategies, including evidence that early, individualised goal-directed treatment improves the outcome of severely injured patients. The overall organisation of the current guideline has been designed to reflect the clinical decision-making process along the patient pathway in an approximate temporal sequence. Recommendations are grouped behind the rationale for key decision points, which are patient- or problem-oriented rather than related to specific treatment modalities. While these recommendations provide guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of major bleeding and coagulopathy, emerging evidence supports the author group's belief that the greatest outcome improvement can be achieved through education and the establishment of and adherence to local clinical management algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidance are key to improving patient outcomes. If incorporated into local practice, these clinical practice guidelines have the potential to ensure a uniform standard of care across Europe and beyond and better outcomes for the severely bleeding trauma patient.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement

There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

Open Repair of a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on a Patient Under Rivaroxaban and Clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants are commonly used instead of vitamin K antagonists in patients needing long-term anticoagulant treatment. As their use has become more popular, there is an increase possibility to perform a major surgery on an urgent or emergency basis on patients under nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on a male patient under rivaroxaban and clopidogrel. Emergency open repair of the aneurysm was performed. No anti-Xa antidote was administered. The patient had an uneventful recovery.

CONCLUSION

An open repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm under rivaroxaban is feasible. However, an antidote should be available in cases of uncontrolled diffused bleeding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of successful open repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on a patient under rivaroxaban and clopidogrel.

Reversing anti–factor Xa agents and the unmet needs in trauma patients

Andexanet alfa, a reversing agent for anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa, has recently been licensed in the United States. We discuss the impact of this licensure on current practice and review in detail the problems of a neglected and growing clinical area: reversing the anticoagulation effect of factor Xa inhibitors in bleeding trauma patients. We identify areas of practice that need research so that care of bleeding trauma patients receiving direct factor Xa inhibitors can be improved.

Laboratory measures of coagulation among trauma patients on NOAs: results of the AAST-MIT

Background

Warfarin is associated with poor outcomes after trauma, an effect correlated with elevations in the international normalized ratio (INR). In contrast, the novel oral anticoagulants (NOAs) have no validated laboratory measure to quantify coagulopathy. We sought to determine if use of NOAs was associated with elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or INR levels among trauma patients or increased clotting times on thromboelastography (TEG).

Methods

This was a post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational study across 16 trauma centers. Patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban were included. Laboratory data were collected at admission and after reversal. Admission labs were compared between medication groups. Traditional measures of coagulopathy were compared with TEG results using Spearman's rank coefficient for correlation. Labs before and after reversal were also analyzed between medication groups.

Results

182 patients were enrolled between June 2013 and July 2015: 50 on dabigatran, 123 on rivaroxaban, and 34 apixaban. INR values were mildly elevated among patients on dabigatran (median 1.3, IQR 1.1-1.4) and rivaroxaban (median 1.3, IQR 1.1-1.6) compared with apixaban (median 1.1, IQR 1.0-1.2). Patients on dabigatran had slightly higher than normal aPTT values (median 35, IQR 29.8-46.3), whereas those on rivaroxaban and apixaban did not. Fifty patients had TEG results. The median values for R, alpha, MA and lysis were normal for all groups. Prothrombin time (PT) and aPTT had a high correlation in all groups (dabigatran p=0.0005, rivaroxaban p<0.0001, and apixaban p<0.0001). aPTT correlated with the R value on TEG in patients on dabigatran (p=0.0094) and rivaroxaban (p=0.0028) but not apixaban (p=0.2532). Reversal occurred in 14%, 25%, and 18% of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban patients, respectively. Both traditional measures of coagulopathy and TEG remained within normal limits after reversal.

Discussion

Neither traditional measures of coagulation nor TEG were able to detect coagulopathy in patients on NOAs.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

The risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage with direct acting oral anticoagulants after trauma: A two-center study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of a delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in trauma patients on direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

METHODS

Patients on DOACs admitted to two Level I Trauma Centers between 2014 and 2017 were reviewed. Only patients with a negative admission CT brain were included. The primary outcome was a delayed ICH.

RESULTS

Overall, 249 patients were included. The median age was 81 years with 82% undergoing a repeat CT. Three patients developed a delayed ICH (1.2%). One developed an ICH after receiving tissue plasminogen activator for a cerebrovascular accident after two negative CTs. Excluding this patient, the incidence dropped to 0.8%. None required neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

For patients at risk for a TBI who are on DOACs, repeat cross-sectional imaging of the brain when the initial imaging is negative is not necessary. A period of clinical observation may be warranted.

Delayed intracranial hemorrhage in elderly anticoagulated patients sustaining a minor fall

BACKGROUND

Falls are a common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality among the elderly in the United States. Evidence-based imaging recommendations for evaluation of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (DICH) are not generally agreed upon. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the incidence of DICH detected by head computer tomography (CT) among an elderly population on pre-injury anticoagulant or antiplatelet (ACAP) therapy.

METHODS

Data from a Level 1 Trauma Center trauma registry was used to assess the incidence of DICH in an elderly population of patients (≥65 years) who sustained a minor fall while on pre-injury ACAP medications. Counts and percentages are reported.

RESULTS

Data on 1076 elderly trauma patients were downloaded, of which 838 sustained a minor fall and 513 were found to be using a pre-injury ACAP medication. One patient (0.46%) with a DICH was identified out of 218 patients who received a routine repeat head CT. Aspirin and warfarin were the most common pre-injury ACAP medications and 19.27% (42/218) of patients were found to be using multiple ACAP medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal screening protocols promote immediate-term patient safety, but do so at a great expense with respect to health expenditures and increased radiation exposure. This analysis highlights the need for an effective risk assessment tool for DICH that would reduce the burden of unnecessary screenings while still identifying life-threatening intracranial hemorrhages in affected patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants do not worsen traumatic brain injury after low-level falls in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Falls are now the leading cause of trauma and represent the most common type of trauma in the elderly. The use of anticoagulants is increasing in older patients, but there are little data on outcomes after traumatic brain injury while anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin. We hypothesized that anticoagulated patients would have a greater mortality and complications than nonanticoagulated patients, and patients on direct oral anticoagulants would have more fatal outcomes after low-level falls because of lack of reversal agents.

METHODS

Patients 65 years or older admitted to level 1-3 trauma centers with 24-hour neurosurgical care were identified through the administrative database of 19 Trinity Health hospitals. Patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes consistent with low-level fall and traumatic brain injury from May 2013 through October 2015 were included. Preadmission warfarin or direct oral anticoagulant use was extracted from admission reconciliation of medications in the database.

RESULTS

A total of 700 patients met inclusion criteria with 177 on anticoagulants before admission. Anticoagulated patients had more cardiac (P < .001), pulmonary (P < .001), and clotting (P < .02) comorbidities. Warfarin patients had the greatest neurosurgical intervention rate at 18% compared with direct oral anticoagulants (2.8%, P < .02) or nonanticoagulation (11%, P < .02). No difference was identified in overall mortality and mortality after neurosurgical intervention between the nonanticoagulated, warfarin, or direct oral anticoagulant groups. Warfarin patients received more plasma (P < .001) and red cell transfusions (P = .035) with greater intensive care unit stays (P < .001) compared with direct oral anticoagulant or nonanticoagulated patients. With logistic regression, only advancing age (P < .05) and a lesser Glasgow Coma Scale score (P < .01) were associated with greater mortality.

CONCLUSION

Older direct oral anticoagulant patients with traumatic brain injury after low-level fall did not have increased morbidity or mortality compared with those treated with warfarin or who were not treated with anticoagulants. Concerns over the use of direct oral anticoagulant agents in this population may be overstated and deserve more scrutiny.

The impact of direct oral anticoagulants in traumatic brain injury patients greater than 60-years-old

Background

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) carry an increased risk for intracranial haematoma (ICH) formation. There is a paucity of data about the role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) among TBI patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we investigated all TBI patients ≥60-years-old who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from January 2014 until May 2017. Patients were grouped into those receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKA), platelet inhibitors (PI), DOACs and no antithrombotic therapy (no-ATT).

Results

One-hundred-eighty-six, predominantly male (52.7%) TBI patients with a median age of 79 years (range: 70–85 years) were enrolled in the study. Glasgow Coma Scale and S-100β were not different among the groups. Patients on VKA and DOACs had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index compared to the PI group and no-ATT group (p = 0.0021). The VKA group received reversal agents significantly more often than the other groups (p < 0.0001). Haematoma progression in the follow-up cranial computed tomography (CCT) was lowest in the DOAC group. The number of CCT and surgical interventions were low with no differences between the groups. No relevant differences in ICU and hospital length of stay were observed. Mortality in the VKA group was significantly higher compared to DOAC, PI and no-ATT group (p = 0.047).

Discussion

Data from huge registry studies displayed higher efficacy and lower fatal bleeding rates for DOACs compared to VKAs. The current study revealed comparable results. Despite the fact that TBI patients on VKAs received reversal agents more often than patients on DOACs (84.4% vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001), mortality rate was significantly higher in the VKA group (p = 0.047).

Conclusion

In patients ≥60 years suffering from TBI, anticoagulation with DOACs appears to be safer than with VKA. Anti-thrombotic therapy with VKA resulted in a worse outcome compared to DOACs and PI. Further studies are warranted to confirm this finding.