51
|
|
52
|
Van der Poorten D, Katelaris PH. The effectiveness of rifabutin triple therapy for patients with difficult-to-eradicate Helicobacter pylori in clinical practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26:1537-42. [PMID: 17903237 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03531.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure of first line and subsequent Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is a significant problem and alternative treatments are few. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy of a rifabutin-based triple therapy in clinical practice and determine the optimal strategy for its use. METHODS Patients referred after first or subsequent treatment failure were prescribed rifabutin triple therapy consisting of standard dose proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin 1 g and rifabutin 150 mg each b.d. for 10 days. RESULTS In 67 patients, the main indications for treatment were dyspepsia (55%), peptic ulcer disease (24%) and increased gastric cancer risk (18%). The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range: 1-9). Eradication of Helicobacter pylori was achieved in 76% (48/63) per protocol and 72% (48/67) on an intention-to-treat basis. When used as second line therapy, 95% (18/19) achieved eradication compared with 68% (30/44) when two or more previous treatments had been used (P = 0.03). Outcome was independent of age, ethnicity, gender or indication for treatment. Adverse events were reported in 10%. CONCLUSION Rifabutin triple therapy is a well tolerated and effective second line therapy in the treatment of persistent Helicobacter pylori; however, its efficacy decreases with increasing number of failed previous therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Van der Poorten
- Gastroenterology Department, University of Sydney, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Rodgers C, van Zanten SV. A meta-analysis of the success rate of Helicobacter pylori therapy in Canada. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = JOURNAL CANADIEN DE GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2007; 21:295-300. [PMID: 17505565 PMCID: PMC2657711 DOI: 10.1155/2007/419784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Helicobacter pylori treatment success rates have varied. A systematic review of the success rate of anti- H pylori therapy in Canada was performed. METHODS All clinical trials containing Canadian data on the success rate of H pylori treatment were identified using MEDLINE searches, through review of references of retrieved studies and by contacting key investigators. Both randomized and open-label trials were included. Treatment effect size was calculated using a variation of Cochran's Q method. RESULTS Seventeen papers met the inclusion criteria. Both triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole performed well, achieving a success rate of 84% and 82%, respectively. The cure rate of PPI-amoxicillin + metronidazole was 76%. Quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline, given for seven to 10 days, achieved a success rate of 87%. CONCLUSION Both PPI-based triple therapy and quadruple therapy perform well in Canada for the treatment of H pylori infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
- Correspondence: Dr Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Zeidler Ledcor Centre, 130 University Campus, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2X8. Telephone 902-473-1499, fax 902-473-6891, e-mail
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Chey WD, Wong BCY. American College of Gastroenterology guideline on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1808-25. [PMID: 17608775 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01393.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 792] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) remains a prevalent, worldwide, chronic infection. Though the prevalence of this infection appears to be decreasing in many parts of the world, H. pylori remains an important factor linked to the development of peptic ulcer disease, gastric malignanc and dyspeptic symptoms. Whether to test for H. pylori in patients with functional dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), patients taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, with iron deficiency anemia, or who are at greater risk of developing gastric cancer remains controversial. H. pylori can be diagnosed by endoscopic or nonendoscopic methods. A variety of factors including the need for endoscopy, pretest probability of infection, local availability, and an understanding of the performance characteristics and cost of the individual tests influences choice of evaluation in a given patient. Testing to prove eradication should be performed in patients who receive treatment of H. pylori for peptic ulcer disease, individuals with persistent dyspeptic symptoms despite the test-and-treat strategy, those with H. pylori-associated MALT lymphoma, and individuals who have undergone resection of early gastric cancer. Recent studies suggest that eradication rates achieved by first-line treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin, and amoxicillin have decreased to 70-85%, in part due to increasing clarithromycin resistance. Eradication rates may also be lower with 7 versus 14-day regimens. Bismuth-containing quadruple regimens for 7-14 days are another first-line treatment option. Sequential therapy for 10 days has shown promise in Europe but requires validation in North America. The most commonly used salvage regimen in patients with persistent H. pylori is bismuth quadruple therapy. Recent data suggest that a PPI, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin for 10 days is more effective and better tolerated than bismuth quadruple therapy for persistent H. pylori infection, though this needs to be validated in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Chey
- University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Navarro-Jarabo JM, Fernández N, Sousa FL, Cabrera E, Castro M, Ramírez LM, Rivera R, Ubiña E, Vera F, Méndez I, Rivas-Ruiz F, Moreno JL, Perea-Milla E. Efficacy of rifabutin-based triple therapy as second-line treatment to eradicate helicobacter pylori infection. BMC Gastroenterol 2007; 7:31. [PMID: 17651479 PMCID: PMC1941741 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230x-7-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2006] [Accepted: 07/25/2007] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rifabutin has been found to be effective in multi-resistant patients after various treatment cycles for Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, but it has not been analysed as a second-line treatment. Therefore, we seek to compare the effectiveness of a treatment regimen including rifabutin versus conventional quadruple therapy (QT). Methods Open clinical trial, randomised and multi-centre, of two treatment protocols: A) Conventional regime -QT- (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth citrate 120 mg qid, tetracycline 500 mg qid and metronidazole 500 mg tid); B) Experimental one -OAR- (omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 gr bid, and rifabutin 150 mg bid), both taken orally for 7 days, in patients with HP infection for whom first-line treatment had failed. Eradication was determined by Urea Breath Test (UBT). Safety was determined by the adverse events. Results 99 patients were randomised, QT, n = 54; OAR, n = 45. The two groups were homogeneous. In 8 cases, treatment was suspended (6 in QT and 2 in OAR). The eradication achieved, analysed by ITT, was for QT, 38 cases (70.4%), and for OAR, 20 cases (44.4%); p = 0.009, OR = 1.58. Of the cases analysed PP, QT were 77.1%; OAR, 46.5%; p = 0.002. Adverse effects were described in 64% of the QT patients and in 44% of the OAR patients (p = 0.04). Conclusion A 7-day rifabutin-based triple therapy associated to amoxicillin and omeprazole at standard dose was not found to be effective as a second-line rescue therapy. The problem with quadruple therapy lies in the adverse side effects it provokes. We believe the search should continue for alternatives that are more comfortably administered and that are at least as effective, but with fewer adverse side effects. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN81058036
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Navarro-Jarabo
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Nuria Fernández
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Francisca L Sousa
- Sección de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital de Motril, Av. Enrique Martín Cuevas, S/N 18600 Motril, Spain
| | - Encarnación Cabrera
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General de Especialidades de Jaén, Avda. del Ejército Español, 10. 23007 Jaén, Spain
| | - Manuel Castro
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Ntra. Sra. de Valme, Ctra. de Cádiz km. 548,9, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Luz M Ramírez
- Sección de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Comarcal Valle de los Pedroches, Juan del Rey Calero s/n, 14400 Pozoblanco, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Robin Rivera
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Esther Ubiña
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Francisco Vera
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Isabel Méndez
- Unidad de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Francisco Rivas-Ruiz
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - José L Moreno
- Unidad de Farmacia, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| | - Emilio Perea-Milla
- Unidad de Apoyo a la Investigación, Hospital Costa del Sol, Ctra Nacional 340, km 187, 29600 Marbella, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Shirai N, Sugimoto M, Kodaira C, Nishino M, Ikuma M, Kajimura M, Ohashi K, Ishizaki T, Hishida A, Furuta T. Dual therapy with high doses of rabeprazole and amoxicillin versus triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole as a rescue regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection after the standard triple therapy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63:743-9. [PMID: 17565490 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0302-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2006] [Accepted: 03/20/2007] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS Development of safe and effective rescue regimens for eradication failure of Helicobacter pylori infection by standard regimens is an urgent task. We designed the prospective study to compare the efficacy of two rescue regimens after eradication failure by the standard triple therapy. METHODS One hundred and thirty-two patients in whom eradication of H. pylori infection failed initial triple therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d, amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d. and clarithromycin 400 mg b.i.d. for 1 week were randomized to either the 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 250 mg b.i.d. (RAM) or the 2-week dual therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg q.i.d. and amoxicillin 500 mg q.i.d. (RA). Eradication of H. pylori was judged by (13)C-urea breath test 1 month later. RESULTS The intention-to-treat and per-protocol-based eradication rates were 92.4% (95% CI: 83.2-97.5) and 95.3% (95% CI: 86.9-99.0) for the RAM therapy and 90.9% (95% CI: 81.2-96.6) and 93.8% (95% CI: 84.8-98.3), respectively, for the RA therapy (P > 0.2 for both). No clinically recognizable adverse events were observed with either regimen. CONCLUSION RA as well as RAM therapy are safe and effective rescue regimens for H. pylori infection after eradication failure by the standard triple therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohito Shirai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Abstract
Triple therapy, consisting of two antibiotics, clarithomycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole in combination with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has become the first-line option for infection with Helicobacter pylori and has been recommended at several consensus conferences. In clinical practice, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication with the recommended treatment regimens. Major causes of treatment failure are insufficient patient compliance and antibiotic resistance. Because of antibiotic resistance, bismuth-based quadruple therapy has also become a first-line regimen in areas with exceedingly high rates of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance, and is the preferred second-line option otherwise. Triple therapies based on levofloxacin and/or rifabutin mainly with combination of amoxicillin are options if multiple eradication failure occurs. However, following therapy failure beyond a second treatment attempt requires antibiotic resistance testing. New drugs and adjuvant agents have been reported but their efficacy needs further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Wolle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
58
|
Morgner A, Labenz J, Miehlke S. Effective regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007; 15:995-1016. [PMID: 16916269 DOI: 10.1517/13543784.15.9.995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy remains a challenge in medical practice. Currently, a proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin, amoxicillin or nitroimidazole for 7 days is the recommended first-line treatment approach with an expected eradication success rate of approximately 80%. As a second-line treatment option in the case of failure, a ranitidine bismuth citrate-based quadruple therapy is currently recommended curing another 80% of patients, leaving a subset of patients with persistent H. pylori infection. For these patients, promising rescue options have been evaluated including regimens that contain rifabutin, quinolones, furazolidone or high-dose amoxicillin. The role of susceptibility testing is still under discussion. It is not generally recommended prior to first-line treatment but guidelines propose a role for culture and antibiotic sensitivity testing after failure of the second attempt. Meanwhile, data on the geographic distribution of resistance pattern are available and may guide therapeutic decisions with regard to the combination of antibiotics chosen for the individual patients aiming at 100% cure rate in each individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Morgner
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Department I, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
59
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review attempts to contextualize some of the clinically important publications of the last 2 years as they relate to the broad topic of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease, both Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related. RECENT FINDINGS This review includes findings which provide insight with regard to the triaging of dyspeptic subjects, information on new proton pump inhibitor drugs and H. pylori eradication 'rescue regimens'. The 'COX-2 debacle' is discussed and new data relating to the efficacy of co-therapy strategies for the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy are presented, while the use of antiplatelet agents as 'safe' substitutes for aspirin cardioprophylaxis is questioned. The important issue of proton pump inhibitor safety and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug enteropathy are addressed. SUMMARY The review provides a summary and interpretation of literature pertaining to the above issues, and should provide a point of departure for clinical decision-making relevant to these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Japie A Louw
- Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's University/Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Abstract
In clinical practice the recommended treatment regimens achieve only an 80%Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and this rate is lower in patients who have failed first-line treatment. The increasing indications for H. pylori treatment (idiopathic thrombocytopenia and iron deficiency anemia) and an increasing trend of antibiotic resistance (especially in southern Europe) emphasize the need for more effective H. pylori eradication. Smoking and a short duration of treatment, especially in patients with functional dyspepsia, are predictors of eradication failure. In first line, the best option remains the clarithromycin-based regimens but an extended treatment duration is now indicated. Following first-line treatment failure, 14-day proton pump inhibitor triple therapy employing alternative antibiotics or quadruple therapy could be used. Levofloxacin-based 10-day triple therapy seems to be an encouraging strategy following one or more eradication failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas G Cavallaro
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Gastroenterology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Cianci R, Montalto M, Pandolfi F, Gasbarrini GB, Cammarota G. Third-line rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:2313-9. [PMID: 16688818 PMCID: PMC4088063 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
H pylori gastric infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. The discovery that most upper gastrointestinal diseases are related to H pylori infection and therefore can be treated with antibiotics is an important medical advance. Currently, a first-line triple therapy based on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin and amo-xicillin or nitroimidazole) is recommended by all consensus conferences and guidelines. Even with the correct use of this drug combination, infection can not be eradicated in up to 23% of patients. Therefore, several second line therapies have been recommended. A 7 d quadruple therapy based on PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole is the more frequently accepted. However, with second-line therapy, bacterial eradication may fail in up to 40% of cases. When H pylori eradication is strictly indicated the choice of further treatment is controversial. Currently, a standard third-line therapy is lacking and various protocols have been proposed. Even after two consecutive failures, the most recent literature data have demonstrated that H pylori eradication can be achieved in almost all patients, even when antibiotic susceptibility is not tested. Different possibilities of empirical treatment exist and the available third-line strategies are herein reviewed.
Collapse
|