Effects of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients: a population model analysis

Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Pradax™, Prazaxa®) is indicated for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in adults who have undergone elective total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties and results of a cost-utility analysis. The discussion of clinical trial data focuses on comparative trials with the EU approved dosage regimen of once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral prodrug of the potent, rapidly acting, reversible, competitive inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Dabigatran has predictable and consistent anticoagulant effects and does not require routine coagulation monitoring or dose titration. In the large, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trials, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II, oral dabigatran etexilate, at dosages of 150 and 220 mg once daily, initiated postoperatively was shown to be noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily (initiated prior to surgery) with regard to the incidence of the composite of total VTE events and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TKR or THR surgery. In general, oral dabigatran etexilate was well tolerated in clinical trials of patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in bleeding complications, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding or minor bleeding between the dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin sodium groups. In addition, a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the UK National Health Service indicated that dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily is dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) to enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily in patients undergoing THR or TKR. Additional head-to-head comparisons would be beneficial to more definitively position dabigatran etexilate relative to other available oral treatment options for VTE prophylaxis, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban. In the meantime, dabigatran etexilate offers a convenient, effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing TKR and THR surgery.

Dabigatran: a primer for neurosurgeons

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to present an overview of dabigatran, a new anticoagulant, and to discuss the implications for the perioperative management of patients taking dabigatran.

METHODS

We reviewed the English literature pertaining to the new oral anticoagulant, dabigatran (Pradaxa).

RESULTS

Dabigatran has the advantage of providing rapid and steady anticoagulation without requiring laboratory monitoring. However, the fact that no practical, reliable method of monitoring of the anticoagulant effects is available constitutes a challenge when contemplating urgent neurosurgical procedures in patients treated with this medication. Although the risk of intracranial hemorrhage with dabigatran was lower than with warfarin in the large trial leading to the approval of the drug, the management of these complications may be problematic because there is no current antidote.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a basic overview of dabigatran, discuss the implications for the perioperative management of patients taking this new anticoagulant, and offer recommendations for the management of intracranial hemorrhage related to this drug.

Novel anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation stroke prevention

This review article evaluates novel oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin for thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is the most frequently diagnosed arrhythmia in the United States. The most serious side effect of AF is stroke. Warfarin has several decades of proven efficacy in AF-related stroke prevention but the drug's numerous drawbacks make its implementation difficult for practitioners and patients. The difficulties of warfarin have prompted the development of alternative anticoagulants for AF-related stroke prevention with better efficacy, safety, and convenience. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, and the oral factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban, have been evaluated in a large phase III trial. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban were shown to be noninferior compared with warfarin in the prevention of stroke. Dabigatran and apixaban were found to be statistically superior to warfarin. All three may also have a better safety profile than warfarin. In conclusion, novel anticoagulants have a different pharmacologic profile compared with warfarin that may eliminate many of the treatment inconveniences. Practitioners must also be aware of the disadvantages these new drugs possess when choosing a management strategy for their patients. Drug selection may become clearer as these new drugs are used more extensively.

Dabigatran: Will it Replace Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation?

Dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is the first oral alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran offers several potential advantages over warfarin including ease of dosing, fewer drug interactions, and the lack of required coagulation monitoring. However, its overall effectiveness and safety will depend upon appropriate patient selection. This article discusses factors that should be taken into account when considering dabigatran for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Dabigatran (Pradaxa)

Dabigatran (Pradaxa) is a member of the relatively new class of antithrombotic drugs known as direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). It may supplant warfarin (Coumadin) in a number of applications as it may produce a more predictable, potent, and immediate anticoagulant effect, with fewer significant side effects and interactions, and requires less monitoring.

New anticoagulants: moving on from scientific results to clinical implementation

Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) are the only registered oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VKA have an unpredictable and highly variable effect on coagulation, with a high risk of under- and over-treatment. Novel anticoagulants, such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, could be a very welcome replacement for VKA, as they show a predictable anticoagulant effect. Results of several phase II and III studies have shown the efficacy and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in the prophylaxis and treatment of VTE, and for the prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation. It remains to be shown whether these new anticoagulants have the same safety profile in daily clinical practice, where more vulnerable patients will be treated. Lack of information on the proper monitoring method or antidote in case of bleeding may also hinder the translation from science to clinical practice.

Understanding the time course of pharmacological effect: a PKPD approach

The key concepts that underpin the choice of drug and dosing regimen are an understanding of the drugs' effectiveness, the potential for adverse effects, and the expected time course over which both desired and adverse effects are likely to occur. Research in clinical pharmacology should therefore address three fundamental questions: (1) What is the magnitude of drug effects (beneficial or adverse) from a given dose? (2) How quickly will any given effects occur? (3) How long will these effects last? Under steady-state conditions, only the magnitude of drug effects can be examined. This requires researchers to consider non-steady-state conditions, which require more complex models and an understanding of the mechanisms that drive the time course of drug effect. The aim of this review is to provide a conceptual framework for understanding the time course of drug effects using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Key examples will illustrate how this can inform the optimal use of drugs in the clinic.

Old versus new oral anticoagulants: focus on pharmacology

Since the discovery of heparin nearly a century ago, there have been large gaps in the development of anticoagulants. The discovery of warfarin was the first step toward using oral anticoagulants, but warfarin use has been associated with its own challenges from the perspectives of the prescribing physician and the patient. Warfarin, along with other coumarins, has a narrow therapeutic index, requires frequent monitoring, exhibits interindividual response variations, and is associated with several adverse effects. Frequent drug and food interactions contribute to potential safety and efficacy compromise. The indications for use of oral anticoagulants have increased, as these drugs are used not only for thrombosis management but also for cardiovascular indications, producing more challenges for oral anticoagulant use. Factor Xa and thrombin targeting has provided a rational approach to develop new oral anticoagulants with improvements over warfarin. In this review, the pharmacology of warfarin and the pharmacology of the newly developed oral anti-Xa and antithrombin agents are discussed.

Dabigatran

Each month, subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service receive 5 to 6 well-documented monographs on drugs that are newly released or are in late phase 3 trials. The monographs are targeted to Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committees. Subscribers also receive monthly 1-page summary monographs on agents that are useful for agendas and pharmacy/nursing in-services. A comprehensive target drug utilization evaluation/medication use evaluation (DUE/MUE) is also provided each month. With a subscription, the monographs are sent in print and are also available on-line. Monographs can be customized to meet the needs of a facility. Subscribers to The Formulary Monograph Service also receive access to a pharmacy bulletin board, The Formulary Information Exchange (The F.I.X.). All topics pertinent to clinical and hospital pharmacy are discussed on The F.I.X. Through the cooperation of The Formulary, Hospital Pharmacy publishes selected reviews in this column. For more information about The Formulary Monograph Service or The F.I.X., call The Formulary at 800-322-4349. The March 2011 monograph topics are on fentanyl sublingual tablet, brentuximab vedotin, rilpivirine hydrochloride, denufosol, abiraterone acetate. The DUE/MUE is on dabigatran etexilate mesylate.

Dabigatran etexilate: a possible replacement for heparinoids and vitamin K antagonists?

Dabigatran etexilate is the first oral anticoagulant to be approved in the United States in decades. It works directly by inhibiting clot-bound and free factor IIa (ie, thrombin) and indirectly by inhibiting platelet aggregation induced by thrombin. It is approved in the United States for stroke prophylaxis in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. There is evidence to suggest that it is also effective for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after knee and hip replacement surgery. Dabigatran etexilate therapy does not require laboratory monitoring, an advantage over warfarin. Unlike the earlier direct thrombin inhibitor, ximelagatran, it has demonstrated no potential for serious hepatotoxicity. It is also subject to a much lower degree of interpatient variability in dose response, has no diet-drug interactions, and has fewer clinically significant drug-drug interactions compared with warfarin. Dabigatran etexilate appears to be a valuable addition to our anticoagulant armamentarium.

Coagulation-induced shedding of platelet glycoprotein VI mediated by factor Xa

This study evaluated shedding of the platelet collagen receptor, glycoprotein VI (GPVI) in human plasma. Collagen or other ligands induce metalloproteinase-mediated GPVI ectodomain shedding, generating approximately 55-kDa soluble GPVI (sGPVI) and approximately 10-kDa platelet-associated fragments. In the absence of GPVI ligands, coagulation of platelet-rich plasma from healthy persons induced GPVI shedding, independent of added tissue factor, but inhibitable by metalloproteinase inhibitor, GM6001. Factor Xa (FXa) common to intrinsic and tissue factor-mediated coagulation pathways was critical for sGPVI release because (1) shedding was strongly blocked by the FXa-selective inhibitor rivaroxaban but not FIIa (thrombin) inhibitors dabigatran or hirudin; (2) Russell viper venom that directly activates FX generated sGPVI, with complete inhibition by enoxaparin (inhibits FXa and FIIa) but not hirudin; (3) impaired GPVI shedding during coagulation of washed platelets resuspended in FX-depleted plasma was restored by adding purified FX; and (4) purified FXa induced GM6001-inhibitable GPVI shedding from washed platelets. In 29 patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation, mean plasma sGPVI was 53.9 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, 39.9-72.8 ng/mL) compared with 12.5 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, 9.0-17.3 ng/mL) in thrombocytopenic controls (n = 36, P < .0001), and 14.6 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, 7.9-27.1 ng/mL) in healthy subjects (n = 25, P = .002). In conclusion, coagulation-induced GPVI shedding via FXa down-regulates GPVI under procoagulant conditions. FXa inhibitors have an unexpected role in preventing GPVI down-regulation.

Dabigatran etexilate prevents venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients with a safety profile comparable to placebo

We assessed the efficacy, safety, and dose-response of dabigatran etexilate (DAB) in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Japanese patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Five hundred twelve patients received DAB (110, 150, or 220 mg) or placebo once daily for 11 to 14 days, starting the day after surgery. The primary efficacy end point was the incidence of total VTE and all-cause mortality; the primary safety end point was incidence of major, clinically relevant, and minor bleeding events. Total VTE and all-cause mortality were lower in patients receiving DAB (39.6%, 32.7%, and 24.0%) than placebo (56.4%). There was no difference in the incidence of major bleeding between the DAB and placebo groups. Overall, DAB reduced the incidence of VTE in Japanese patients undergoing TKA, with a comparable safety profile vs placebo.

Dabigatran: An Oral Novel Potent Reversible Nonpeptide Inhibitor of Thrombin

Dabigatran is a highly selective, reversible, and potent thrombin inhibitor and is orally available as the prodrug, dabigatran etexilate. It has shown antithrombotic efficacy in animal models of thrombosis, with a rapid onset of action and predictable pharmacodynamic response. Peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran occur 1 to 2 hours after ingestion of the prodrug. The terminal half-life of dabigatran is 12 to 14 hours in elderly volunteers. Dabigatran is not metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and does not interact with food. Dabigatran has a low potential for drug-drug interactions and is predominantly renally excreted. Dabigatran etexilate as chronic therapy effectively prevents the recurrence of venous thromboembolism and cardioembolic stroke. For the first time, it has been demonstrated clinically that there may be an effective and safe alternative to warfarin.

Pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

Dabigatran etexilate is a novel, oral reversible direct thrombin inhibitor that is rapidly absorbed and converted to its active form, dabigatran. Dabigatran has been shown to be a potent, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of thrombin, inhibiting both thrombin activity and generation. Studies in healthy volunteers and in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery indicate that dabigatran has a predictable pharmacokinetic profile, allowing for a fixed-dose regimen without the need for coagulation monitoring. In healthy volunteers, peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran are reached approximately 2 hours after oral administration. The elimination half-life is 12 to 14 hours, with clearance predominantly occurring via renal excretion of unchanged drug. Dabigatran is not metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, has no interactions with food, and also has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. The pharmacokinetic profile of dabigatran is consistent across a broad range of different patient populations and is unaffected by gender, body weight, ethnic origin, obesity, and mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment. Small differences in dabigatran pharmacokinetics associated with age are attributable to variation in renal function. Dabigatran etexilate produces a predictable pharmacodynamic effect and requires no coagulation monitoring. It has been approved in the European Union (EU) and Canada for prophylaxis of thromboembolism in patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty. Ongoing clinical trials are investigating its use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and treatment of thromboembolic complications, following acute coronary syndromes.

Dabigatran etexilate: pivotal trials for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty

Dabigatran etexilate, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, was investigated in 3 large phase III trials for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE, N = 3494) or total knee arthroplasty (RE-MODEL, N = 2076 and RE-MOBILIZE, N = 2615). RE-NOVATE and RE-MODEL were conducted mainly in Europe, and RE-MOBILIZE was conducted predominantly in the United States and Canada. This review discusses the results of these trials. In all 3 trials, 2 doses, 220 mg and 150 mg once daily, were compared with enoxaparin. Both RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE demonstrated noninferiority for the primary outcome (a composite of total VTE events and all-cause mortality), P = .0003 and P < .0001, respectively, for these trials. In 2008, these data formed the basis for European and Canadian approval. While RE-MOBILIZE did not demonstrate noninferiority for the primary outcome (25.3% for enoxaparin vs 31.1% for 220 mg, risk difference +5.8%, 95% CI, 0.8-10.8; P = .02 and 33.7% for 150 mg, risk difference +8.4%, 95% CI, 3.4-13.3; P = .0009), both treatments were similar for the secondary composite outcome (major VTE plus VTErelated mortality; 3.4% with 220 mg, 3.0% with 150 mg, and 2.2% with enoxaparin) and symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (0.8%, 0.7%, and 0.6%). There were no differences in the bleeding rates, hepatic enzyme elevations, or acute coronary syndrome events between the 2 treatments. With the practical advantages of once-daily oral dosing, dabigatran etexilate can be considered an attractive alternative to conventional thromboprophylaxis regimens in patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate

The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate is currently in phase III of development for the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, with three trials completed in primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention. Dabigatran etexilate is an orally administered prodrug, which is rapidly absorbed and converted to the active form, dabigatran. Dabigatran has been shown to specifically and reversibly inhibit thrombin, the key enzyme in the coagulation cascade. Studies in healthy volunteers and in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery have indicated that dabigatran has a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, allowing for a fixed-dose regimen. Peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran are reached approximately 2 hours after oral administration in healthy volunteers, with no unexpected accumulation of drug concentrations upon multiple dosing. Excretion is predominantly via the renal route as unchanged drug. Dabigatran is not metabolized by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. The small differences in dabigatran pharmacokinetics associated with age and gender are attributed to variations in renal function. Additional studies have shown that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of dabigatran is consistent across a range of patient populations, with no effect of moderate hepatic impairment being observed. Drug-drug interactions are not observed with concomitant administration of atorvastatin, diclofenac or digoxin. The pharmacodynamic profile of dabigatran demonstrates effective anticoagulation combined with a low risk of bleeding. Further phase III studies are ongoing, including acute VTE treatment and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation; the results obtained so far show that dabigatran etexilate is well tolerated and effective in the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic events.

Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran etexilate, an oral, direct thrombin inhibitor, that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment offer potential for prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee replacement surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind study, 2076 patients undergoing total knee replacement received dabigatran etexilate, 150 mg or 220 mg once-daily, starting with a half-dose 1-4 hours after surgery, or subcutaneous enoxaparin 40 mg once-daily, starting the evening before surgery, for 6-10 days. Patients were followed-up for 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of total VTE (venographic or symptomatic) and mortality during treatment, and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of bleeding events.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 37.7% (193 of 512) of the enoxaparin group versus 36.4% (183 of 503) of the dabigatran etexilate 220 mg group (absolute difference, -1.3%; 95% CI, -7.3 to 4.6) and 40.5% (213 of 526) of the 150 mg group (2.8%; 95% CI, -3.1 to 8.7). Both doses were noninferior to enoxaparin based on the pre-specified noninferiority criterion. The incidence of major bleeding did not differ significantly between the three groups (1.3% versus 1.5% and 1.3% respectively). No significant differences in the incidences of liver enzyme elevation and acute coronary events were observed during treatment or follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Dabigatran etexilate (220 mg or 150 mg) was at least as effective and with a similar safety profile as enoxaparin for prevention of VTE after total knee-replacement surgery.