Guidelines for the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients

Impact of mobile angiography in the emergency department for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability

OBJECTIVE

Rapid trauma evaluation and intervention without time delay are considered integral to time-efficient management of trauma patients, particularly for those with hemodynamic instability. This study examined the impact of immediate availability of mobile angiography with digital subtraction angiography technology in the emergency department (ED) for hemodynamically unstable multiple trauma patients with pelvic injury.

MATERIALS

This retrospective review examined a cohort of all blunt trauma patients with pelvic injury who underwent transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) using mobile angiography by trauma surgeons in the ED. This system was set up on a 24-hour basis with full-time trauma surgeons available in-hospital. Data collected included clinical characteristics, injury severity, resuscitation intervals from admission through to completion of hemostasis, metabolic factors (pH and core body temperature), mortality, and TAE-related complications.

RESULTS

Subjects comprised 29 patients (hemodynamically stable group, n = 17; hemodynamically unstable group, n = 12) with a median age of 36 years (interquartile range [IQR], 29-53 years). Mean shock index, injury severity score, and trauma and injury severity score were 1.1 +/- 0.5, 32 +/- 12, and 0.79 +/- 0.27, respectively. Median intervals from ED arrival to diagnosis and from diagnosis to starting TAE were 66 minutes (IQR, 42-80 minutes) and 30 minutes (IQR, 25-37 minutes), respectively. Median interval from diagnosis to completion of TAE was 107 minutes (IQR, 93-130 minutes). Physical and anatomic injury statuses were more severe in the hemodynamically unstable group than in the hemodynamically stable group. However, intervals from diagnosis to starting TAE and from diagnosis to completion of hemostasis did not differ significantly between groups. No exacerbations of metabolic factors during resuscitation were identified. Pelvic injury related mortality was 17% and no TAE-related complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Immediate availability of mobile angiography in the ED seems safe and effective for hemodynamically unstable trauma patients with pelvic injury and results in a rapid improvement in resuscitation intervals without leaving the ED. An adequately randomized controlled trial of mobile angiography in this subset of patients, who would seem to derive the most benefit from mobile angiography, would be ideal.

[Management of hemorrhage in patients with abdominal trauma: application of the European Guidelines for the management of bleeding following major trauma]

In patients with traumatic intraabdominal hemorrhage, urgent decisions must be made. Resuscitation measures must often be simultaneously combined with diagnostic actions and measures to control the source of the bleeding. Hemorrhages are usually complicated by coagulation disorders and the presence of acidosis and hypothermia. In these conditions, emergency measures are required that usually involve various specialists. However, given the paucity of the scientific evidence in this field, the intervention protocols differ from one center to another. The European Guidelines for the management of bleeding following major trauma has recently been published. These guidelines review aspects such as evaluation and initial management of bleeding, localization and control of the source of bleeding and replacement of blood products. In addition, recommendations based on the best available evidence to 2008 are made. This review describes the basic aspects of traumatic intraabdominal hemorrhage.

Pelvic packing or angiography: competitive or complementary?

Pelvic angiography is an established technique that has evolved into a highly effective means of controlling arterial pelvic haemorrhage. The current dominant paradigm for haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures is angiographic management combined with mechanical stabilisation of the pelvis. However, an effective rapid screening tool for arterial bleeding in pelvic fracture patients has yet to be identified. There is also no precise way to determine the major source of bleeding responsible for haemodynamic instability. In many pelvic fracture patients, bleeding is from venous lacerations which are not effectively treated with angiography to fractured bony surfaces. Modern pelvic packing consists of time-saving and minimally invasive techniques which appear to result in effective control of the haemorrhage via tamponade. This review article focuses on the recent body of knowledge on angiography and pelvic packing. We propose the optimal role for each modality in trauma centres.

Acute management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma patients: time for a change? Multicenter review of recent practice

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage-related mortality (HRM) associated with pelvic fractures continues to challenge trauma care. This study describes the management and outcome of hemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture, with emphasis on primary intervention for hemorrhage control and HRM.

METHODS

Blunt trauma patients [Injury Severity Score (ISS) >or=16] with a major pelvic fracture (Abbreviated Injury Score, pelvis >or=3) and hemodynamic instability [admission systolic blood pressure (SBP) <or=90 mmHg or receiving >or=6 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs)/24 hours) were included into a 48-month (ending in December 2003) multicenter retrospective study of 11 major trauma centers. Data are presented as the mean +/- SD.

RESULTS

A total of 217 patients (mean age 41 +/- 19 years, 71% male, ISS 42 +/- 16) were studied. The admission SBP was 96 +/- 37 mmHg and the Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) 11 +/- 5. Patients received 4 +/- 2 liters of fluids including 4 +/- 4 units of PRBCs in the emergency room (ER). In total, 69 (32%) patients died, among whom the HRM was 19%; 29% of the deaths were due to pelvic bleeding. Altogether, 120 of the 217 (55%) patients underwent focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) or diagnostic peritoneal aspiration (DPA) and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL); 60 of the 217 (28%) patients were found to have pelvic binding in the ER. In all, 53 of 109 (49%) patients had no bleeding noted at laparotomy, 26 of 106 (25%) had no abdominal findings, and 15 of 53 (28%) had had no prior abdominal investigation (FAST/DPL/computed tomography). Angiography was positive in 48 of 58 (83%) patients. The HRM was highest in patients with laparotomy as the primary intervention (29%) followed by the angiography group (18%), the combined laparotomy/pelvic fixation group (16%), and the pelvic fixation-only group (10%).

CONCLUSION

HRM associated with major pelvic trauma is unacceptably high especially in the laparotomy group. Hence, nontherapeutic laparotomy must be avoided, concentrating instead on arresting pelvic hemorrhage. Standards of care must be implemented and abided by.

Use of the trauma pelvic orthotic device (T-POD) for provisional stabilisation of anterior-posterior compression type pelvic fractures: a cadaveric study

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate that a commercially available pelvic binder the trauma pelvic orthotic device (T-POD) is an effective way to provisionally stabilise anterior-posterior compression type pelvic injuries.

METHODS

Rotationally unstable pelvic injuries were created in 12 non-embalmed human cadaveric specimens. Each pelvis was then stabilised first with a standard bed sheet wrapped circumferentially around the pelvis and held in place with a clamp. After recreating the symphyseal diastasis, the pelvis was stabilised with the T-POD. Reduction of the symphyseal diastasis was assessed by comparing measurements obtained via pre- and post-stabilisation AP radiographs.

RESULTS

The mean symphyseal diastasis was reduced from 39.3mm (95% CI 30.95-47.55) to 17.4mm (95% CI -0.14 to 34.98) with the bed sheet, and to 7.1mm (95% CI -2.19 to 16.35) with the T-POD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both a circumferential sheet and the T-POD were able to decrease symphyseal diastasis consistently, only the T-POD showed a statistically significant improvement in diastasis when compared to injury measurements. In 75% of the cadaveric specimens (9 of 12), the T-POD was able to reduce the symphysis to normal (<10mm diastasis). Both a circumferential sheet and the T-POD are effective in provisionally stabilising Burgess and Young anterior-posterior compression II type pelvic injuries, but the T-POD is more effective in reducing symphyseal diastasis.

Pelvic Fracture Risk Assessment on Admission

Patients with pelvic fractures (PF) have high incidences of associated injuries and mortality. To identify patients with PF at the highest risk for mortality on admission to a Level I trauma center, investigators analyzed 566 PF in 12,128 patients (1996 to 2005). PF were categorized on arrival as high risk (HR) or low risk (LR) by initial blood pressure, examination, radiographs, and CT. HR PF included open fractures, open-book injuries, PF 4 or greater abbreviated injury score, and hypotension (89 mmHg or less systolic blood pressure); all other cases were categorized as LR PF. Patients with PF had 6 per cent (35 of 566) mortality compared with 3 per cent (300 of 11,529) without PF. Mortality was 24 per cent (25 of 103) in HR PF, including 11 per cent (one of nine) of open fractures, 25 per cent (12 of 49) of open-book injuries, 23 per cent (14 of 62) of 4 or greater abbreviated injury score, and 33 per cent (20 of 60) of hypotensive patients compared with 3 per cent (13 of 454) of LR PF. Compared with LR PF, patients with HR PF were younger (43.5 vs 53.8 years) with higher injury severity scores (28.7 vs 11.9) and longer hospital stays (10.6 vs 7.4 days). PF mortality remains high despite treatment in a Level I trauma center. Trauma mechanism, initial blood pressure, pelvic radiography, and CT can be used to predict a patient's mortality risk.

Advanced trauma life support, 8th edition, the evidence for change

The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma's Advanced Trauma Life Support Course is currently taught in 50 countries. The 8th edition has been revised following broad input by the International ATLS subcommittee. Graded levels of evidence were used to evaluate and approve changes to the course content. New materials related to principles of disaster management have been added. ATLS is a common language teaching one safe way of initial trauma assessment and management.

A treatment protocol for abdomino-pelvic injuries

Background

Abdomino-pelvic injuries often present a challenge for the emergency department. Although literature reports several protocols on the treatment of abdomino-pelvic injuries aiming at defining the most advisable treatment line, optimal treatment is still controversial. This paper describes a protocol that has been used to treat abdomino-pelvic injuries in our hospital since 2002.

Materials and methods

In literature different protocol of abdomino-pelvic injuries are described and comparing them most of the difference are the timing of CT scan, the angiography and the laparotomy when treating a lesion of pelvic ring. If patient is haemodynamically instable and presents a lesion of pelvic ring our protocol suggest the simplest and fastest stabilization (pelvic external fixator) in emergency room and delay exam such as CT scan as second level exam. In the presence of an abdominal injury, with a positive focused assessment with sonography for trauma test, the first step should be a pelvic ring stabilization, as laparotomy decreases the abdominal pressure and reduces the tamponade effect on the retroperitoneum. According to presented protocol the angiography is not be a first choice treatment. This protocol was applied to 58 cases of abdomino-pevic injury with unstable pelvic lesions from October 2002 to December 2005. Mean injury severity score was 27.2 (CI  24.1–30.3).

Results

Five patients (8%) died, three due to haemorrhagic shock and two due to pulmonary embolization. Four patients (6.9%) had a partial or complete cauda equina syndrome, four patients (6.9%) complained of mild incontinence, whilst 1 (1.7%) complained of urinary retention with multiple cystitis. Two patients (3.4%) with retention and multiple cystitis, had a malunion and a painful non-union of the fracture. Seven patients (12.3%) had neurological impairment: 5 (8.6%) sciatic nerve palsy, 1 (1.7%) lumbosacral root lesions in a C2-type fracture and there was one case (1.7%) of inconstant lumbago with sciatic pain. Twelve patients reported different levels of sexual dysfunction (20.7%).

Conclusions

Although validation with a larger cohort is required, our preliminary clinical data are similar to, or better than, those reported in the most recent publications on this question, suggesting that this protocol could well reduce both the mortality rate and the long term complications of abdominopelvic injuries.

Clinical review: initial management of blunt pelvic trauma patients with haemodynamic instability

Pelvic trauma can lead to severe, uncontrollable haemorrhage and death related to prolonged shock and multiple organ failure. Massive retroperitoneal haematoma should be assumed to be present in cases of post-traumatic haemodynamic instability associated with pelvic fracture in the absence of extrapelvic haemorrhagic lesions. This review describes the pathophysiology of retroperitoneal haematoma in trauma patient with blunt pelvic fracture, considering the roles of venous and arterial bleeding. Efficacy and safety of haemostatic procedures are also discussed, and particular attention is given to the efficacy of pelvic angiographic embolization and external pelvic fixation. A decision making algorithm is proposed for the treatment of trauma patients with pelvic fracture that takes haemodynamic status and associated lesions into account.

Nonsurgical treatment of major bleeding

Novel nonsurgical approaches to bleeding control offer hope for improved management of the critical trauma-related coagulopathy and diffuse bleeding that often typify major trauma and pose challenges to surgeons and anesthetists. Although surgical treatment is the cornerstone of bleeding control, in selected patients angiographic embolization is increasingly used early in patient care to successfully manage arterial bleeding attributable to blunt solid organ injury or posterior pelvic ring disruption. Coagulopathic derangements in trauma occur early and require avoidance or correction of acidosis and hypothermia. If bleeding cannot be stopped by these measures, adjunctive use of fibrinogen or recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) have the potential to correct systemic coagulopathy associated with massive blood loss and its management.

Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based recommendations can be made with respect to many aspects of the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient, which when implemented may lead to improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was formed in 2005 with the aim of developing guidelines for the management of bleeding following severe injury. Recommendations were formulated using a nominal group process and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) hierarchy of evidence and were based on a systematic review of published literature.

RESULTS

Key recommendations include the following: The time elapsed between injury and operation should be minimised for patients in need of urgent surgical bleeding control, and patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an identified source of bleeding should undergo immediate surgical bleeding control unless initial resuscitation measures are successful. A damage control surgical approach is essential in the severely injured patient. Pelvic ring disruptions should be closed and stabilised, followed by appropriate angiographic embolisation or surgical bleeding control, including packing. Patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an unidentified source of bleeding should undergo immediate further assessment as appropriate using focused sonography, computed tomography, serum lactate, and/or base deficit measurements. This guideline also reviews appropriate physiological targets and suggested use and dosing of blood products, pharmacological agents, and coagulation factor replacement in the bleeding trauma patient.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of the bleeding trauma patient will help create circumstances in which optimal care can be provided. By their very nature, these guidelines reflect the current state-of-the-art and will need to be updated and revised as important new evidence becomes available.

Impact of timing of pelvic fixation on functional outcome

Pelvic fractures are the third most common cause of death in motor vehicle accidents. Recent improvements in mortality can be attributed to the progress made in modern critical care medicine, multidetector CT, ATLS principles, multidisciplinary protocols and early fracture stabilisation. Currently, the timing of pelvic fixation is often based on the haemodynamic status and response of the patient to resuscitation, the fracture pattern, the presence of associated injuries and the immuno-inflammatory status of the patient. The purpose of this review is to focus on the impact of timing of reconstruction of pelvic fractures on the functional outcome of the patients. Thirty seven scientific studies on the outcome of pelvic and acetabular injuries were reviewed. Four on pelvic ring fractures, and one study on pelvic and acetabular fractures met our second inclusion criterion of prospective or retrospective studies investigating the outcome after early or late pelvic and acetabular fixation. These five studies suggested early pelvic and acetabular fixation for optimal outcome but their main difference was the definition of the length in time of that early period. In polytrauma patients, the "damage control orthopaedics" principle should be applied for haemodynamic and skeletal stabilisation (and faecal diversion, if indicated in cases of open fractures of the pelvis). The definitive fixation should be performed after the fourth post-injury day, when the physiological state of the patient is conducive to surgery.

Traumatic Pelvic Fractures

Pelvic fractures can be a big challenge in caring for the injured patient. Pelvic fractures are important as a cause for morbitidy and mortality. The mortality can be 30% with unstable pelvic ring injuries, and 10-12% of this percentage alone is due to blood loss. Multiple complications can occur during a pelvic fracture. This article will help nurses assess and manage patients with pelvic injuries. Topics covered in the article include basic anatomy of the pelvis, diagnostic tests performed after a pelvic fracture, types of pelvic fractures, management of pelvic fractures, and complications.

Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference?

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with hemodynamic instability related to pelvic fracture is a major challenge, with high morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based institutional practice guidelines (PG) were developed as a strategy to optimize the care of these patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate the adherence to the new PG and compare the outcomes before and after their implementation.

METHODS

Major blunt trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) with hemodynamic instability (initial base deficit > 6 mEq/L or received > 6 units of packed red blood cells [PRBCs] during the first 12 hours) related to pelvic fracture were investigated. Patients presenting with ongoing bleeding from other regions or with severe head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score < 9) were excluded. The pre-PG group (n = 17) were patients managed during the 18 months ending on December 31, 2001. The post-PG group (n = 14) consisted of patients managed during the subsequent 18 months. Demographics, ISS, shock severity, resuscitation, and outcome data were prospectively collected. The adherence to the key steps of PG was evaluated retrospectively in the pre-PG and prospectively in the post-PG group, including abdominal clearance (AC) with diagnostic peritoneal aspiration/lavage or ultrasound (<15 minutes), noninvasive pelvic binding (PB) (<15 minutes), pelvic angiography (PA) (<90 minutes after admission), and minimally invasive orthopedic fixation (MIOF) (<24 hours). Data are presented as mean +/- SEM or percentages.

RESULTS

The pre-PG and post-PG groups were similar regarding age (40 +/- 4 years vs. 42 +/- 6 years), gender (both 71% male), ISS (39 +/- 3 vs. 37 +/- 4), admission base deficit (9 +/- 1 vs. 10 +/- 1) admission systolic blood pressure (116 +/- 7 vs. 112 +/- 6 mm Hg), Glasgow Coma Scale score (12 +/- 1 vs. 12 +/- 1), and PRBC transfusion in the first 12 hours (9 +/- 2 U vs. 9 +/- 2 U). The adherence to the guidelines in the post-PG period was as follows: AC, 100%; PB, 86% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test); PA, 93% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test); and MIOF, 86%. In the pre-PG period, adherence to the guidelines was as follows: AC, 65%; PB, 0%; PA, 30%; and MIOF 52%. In the post-PG period, the 24-hour PRBC transfusion decreased from 16 +/- 2 U to 11 +/- 1 U and the mortality decreased from 35% to 7% (p < 0.05 based on t test or chi test for both).

CONCLUSION

The adherence to the PG as a reflection of optimal management was significantly improved. PG focusing particular on timely hemorrhage control reduced the 24-hour transfusion requirements and the mortality rate in the post-PG group.