Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: Viral and histologic response to full-dose PEG-interferon and ribavirin

Immune-mediated complications of the graft in interferon-treated hepatitis C positive liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the graft is universal and interferon based antiviral therapy remains at present the treatment of choice in HCV liver transplant recipients. Apart from the antiviral effects, interferon and ribavirin have both potent immunomodulatory properties resulting in a broad range of immune-related disorders including acute cellular rejection and chronic ductopenic rejection as well as de novo autoimmune hepatitis. Further complicating the picture, HCV infection per se is associated with a variety of autoimmune phenomena. We discuss here the immune-mediated complications and their relationship to chronic HCV and interferon based antiviral therapy.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection recurrence after liver transplantation: an overview

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the major indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Its recurrence is virtually universal. Once reinfection is established, progression to cirrhosis occurs in 25%-30% of recipients within 5 years. Several studies have attempted to identify the ideal antiviral treatment for liver transplant recipients. At present, the management of recurrent HCV infection in liver transplant recipients is based on widely accepted indications, which represent a reliable guide to identify the "ideal" candidate for therapy, when therapy should be started, and what is to be expected in terms of side effects and response to treatment.

PHOENIX: A randomized controlled trial of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin as a prophylactic treatment after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus

The efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the prophylactic treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin are not known. LT recipients with HCV were randomized to peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment or observation 10 to 26 weeks post-LT. Prophylaxis patients received peginterferon alfa-2a (135 μg/week for 4 weeks and then 180 μg/week for 44 weeks) plus ribavirin (the initial dose of 400 mg/day was escalated to 1200 mg/day). Observation patients received the same regimen only upon significant HCV recurrence (histological activity index ≥ 3 and/or fibrosis score ≥ 2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with histological evidence of significant HCV recurrence 120 weeks after randomization. In all, 115 patients were randomized (prophylaxis arm, n = 55; observation arm, n = 60). Sustained virological response was achieved by 12 of 54 prophylaxis patients (22.2%) and by 3 of 14 observation patients who switched to treatment (21.4%). On an intent-to-treat basis, significant HCV recurrence at 120 weeks was similar in the prophylaxis (61.8%) and observation arms (65.0%, P = 0.725). The patient and graft survival rates and the rates of biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. Approximately 70% of the treated patients in both arms had at least one dose reduction for safety reasons. The most common adverse event leading to treatment withdrawal was anemia. Because of the safety profile of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin and the lack of a clear benefit in terms of HCV recurrence and patient or graft survival, this study does not support the routine use of prophylactic antiviral therapy.

Vitamin D supplementation improves response to antiviral treatment for recurrent hepatitis C

In immune-competent patients, higher vitamin D levels predicted sustained viral response (SVR) following interferon (INF) and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C. This study aimed to verify the influence of vitamin D serum levels and/or vitamin D supplementation in predicting SVR rates for recurrent hepatitis C (RHC). Forty-two consecutive patients were treated for RHC with combination therapy with INF-α and ribavirin for 48 weeks. Vitamin D serum levels were measured in all patients before antiviral therapy. In 15 patients oral vitamin D3 supplementation was administered to avoid further bone loss. SVR was observed in 13 patients; it was achieved in 1/10 severely vitamin D deficient (≤ 10 ng/ml) patients, in 6/20 deficient (>10 and ≤ 20 ng/ml) and in 6/12 with near normal (> 20 ng/ml) 25-OH vitamin D serum levels (P < 0.05). Cholecalciferol supplementation, in the presence of a normal or near normal baseline vitamin D concentration, (improvement of chi-square P < 0.05, odds ratio 2.22) and possessing a genotype other than 1 (improvement of chi-square P < 0.05, odds ratio 3.383) were the only variables independently associated to SVR. In conclusion, vitamin D deficiency predicts an unfavourable response to antiviral treatment of RHC. Vitamin D supplementation improves the probability of achieving a SVR following antiviral treatment.

Systematic review: anti-viral therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the first cause of liver transplantation worldwide. Recurrence of infection is constant, and compromises patient and graft survival.

AIM

To provide an updated review of the main treatments of recurrent HCV.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1990 to August 2010) and national meeting abstract search. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment, sustained virological response. An emphasis was placed on randomised trials.

RESULTS

Anti-viral therapy based on pegylated interferon and ribavirin must be considered before liver transplantation, but is poorly tolerated and has poor results in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-viral therapy can be administrated systematically early after liver transplantation, or in patients with established recurrent chronic hepatitis. Combination of pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin results in a sustained virological response of up to 30% in patients with histological HCV recurrence. The results of a small trial of polyclonal anti-HCV to prevent recurrence were disappointing.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available anti-viral therapy is effective only in a minority of transplanted patients infected with HCV. Specifically targeted anti-viral therapies combining interferon alpha and ribavirin, or a combination of antiprotease and antipolymerase components, associated with a genetic prediction of anti-viral response and blocking HCV cell entry should improve the long-term prognosis of recurrent hepatitis C in the near future.

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation

A significant proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection develop liver cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease over two to three decades and require liver transplantation, however, reinfection is common and leads to further adverse events under immunosuppression. Pretransplant antiviral or preemptive therapy is limited to mildly decompensated patients due to poor tolerance. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic hepatitis C. Combined pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy is the current standard treatment with sustained viral response rates of 25% to 45%. The rate is lower than that in the immunocompetent population, partly due to the high prevalence of intolerability. To date, there is no general consensus regarding the antiviral treatment modality, timing, or dosing for HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. New anti-HCV drugs to delay disease progression or to enhance viral clearance are necessary.

Management of posttransplant hepatitis C infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of liver transplantation. Outcome of HCV-associated liver transplantation has been worse than transplantation from other causes. This is mostly related to universal recurrence of HCV in the allograft leading to graft and patient loss or retransplantation. Current antiviral therapies (AVTs) are inadequate and ineffective in the vast majority of the patients with intolerable side effects in most. However, a sustained virologic response (SVR) is associated with improved graft and patient survival. New specifically targeted AVTs for HCV (STAT-C) agents in development will significantly improve the success of AVT. This review focuses on recent data in peritransplant management of HCV with special emphasis on predictors of outcome, diagnosis, prevention and control of reinfection with newer treatments on the horizon.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the immediate pretransplant setting, AVT should be considered in select patients to eradicate the virus. Careful donor selection, immunosuppression (IMS) modulation with steroid and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization, avoidance of T-cell-depleting treatments and acute rejection episodes, and control of metabolic syndrome can improve allograft outcomes and improve the response to AVT. AVT prior to significant damage to the allograft is strongly recommended.

SUMMARY

With modified novel IMS protocols, careful donor selection, and AVT prior to significant damage to the allograft we can improve the outcome of posttransplant hepatitis C infection. Albeit there are no available data on new antiviral agents, STAT-Cs will have a significant impact in this setting in the near future.

Antiviral treatment of patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation with pegylated interferon

BACKGROUND

The recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (OLT) leads to recurrent cirrhosis in up to 40% of patients.

AIMS

To identify patients who profit the most from antiviral therapy and to delineate whether early treatment after OLT is effective to reach sustained virological response (SVR), we analyzed factors associated to SVR during pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of efficiency and viral decline kinetics in 83 HCV-infected liver transplant recipients who received therapy with PegIFN/RBV was carried out.

RESULTS

Forty-one of 83 (49.4%) patients became HCV RNA-negative. SVR was achieved in 26/83 (31.3%) patients. Viral decline of at least 2 log 10 (n = 47) at week 12 was significantly associated with an end-of-treatment (EOT) response. Eleven early viral response patients were not able to clear HCV RNA, whereas five patients without a 2 log decline achieved SVR. The highest predictive value for SVR was an undetectable viremia at week 24 (92%).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of antiviral combination therapy for HCV reinfection after OLT can be best predicted by week-24 virologic response. The high SVR rates in patients with detectable HCV RNA at week 12 might suggest a prolonged treatment protocol in liver transplant recipients.

Mutations in hepatitis C virus genotype 1b and the sensitivity of interferon-ribavirin therapy after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The results of post-transplant antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) are poor, and significant pre-transplant predictors for sustained viral response (SVR) have not yet been identified.

METHODS

Pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy was performed for more than 48 weeks in 50 patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for HCV genotype 1-related liver disease. Of these, 22 patients achieved SVR. The predictive potential of the viral mutations, including amino acids (aa) 70 and 91 in the Core region, interferon sensitivity-determining region (ISDR, aa 2209-2248) and interferon/ribavirin resistance-determining region (IRRDR, aa 2334-2379) in NS5A, was evaluated.

RESULTS

In 16 patients, the sequences in the pre- and post-transplant samples were the same, except for aa 70 in the Core of 1 patient. The SVR achievement percentage was significantly lower in the Non-double wild (DW) at aa 70 and 91, the ISDR<2 and IRRDR<6 groups than in the DW (30% vs. 65%, p=0.015), the ISDR2 (35% vs. 69%, p=0.035) and IRRDR6 (25% vs. 78%, p<0.001) groups, respectively. Predictive scoring with these three items provides a newly established and significant predictor for SVR after LT (p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

DW, ISDR2 and IRRDR6 were found to be significant predictors for SVR after LT. In addition, it is possible that the establishment of a new scoring system consisting of these three factors may be a useful marker to predict interferon sensitivity for recurrent HCV after LT.

Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation: analysis of factors related to sustained viral response

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence, analyzing possible factors associated with sustained viral responses (SVR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients (25 men and 16 women) of overall mean age of 50 years (range, 33-60) with recurrent HCV were treated with peg-IFN plus ribavirin including 33 (80%) subjects displayed genotype 1. The following variables were analyzed: gender, donor and recipient ages, immunosuppressant, genotype, treatment duration, early viral response (EVR), pretreatment viral load, degree of fibrosis, levels of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase (IU/L), time since liver transplantation (OLT), use of stimulating factors (epoetin and granulocyte colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) and side effects, and their association with SVR. The time from OLT to the start of treatment was 29 months (range, 6-90). Seventy-one percent of patients received cyclosporine and 29% tacrolimus.

RESULTS

The mean treatment duration was 31 (range, 4-72) months with an EVR achieved in 12/38 (31.5%) of patients and a SVR in 16/41 (39%). Treatment was discontinued in 23 patients due to side effects. Epoetin was necessary in 29% and G-CSF in 10%. There were 3 cases of rejection (1 mild and 2 severe culminating in death). On univariate analysis genotype non-1B (P < .02), pretherapy RNA (P < .02), complete treatment, and EVR (P < .005) were the only variables associated with SVR. The mean donor age of 43 years showed no statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with peg-IFN plus ribavirin achieves an acceptable SVR, although not entirely free from severe side effects. Ensuring completion of the full treatment course is fundamental to achieve SVR.

Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation

Chronic infection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) represents one of the major causes for end-stage liver disease worldwide. Although liver transplantation offers an effective treatment, HCV reinfection of the transplanted graft is a critical and almost inevitable complication with major influence on graft- and patient survival. Pre-transplant antiviral therapy in advanced liver disease is limited by poor tolerance and only applicable to mildly decompensated patients but was able to show promising results in patients reaching negative viral load when undergoing transplantation. Prophylactic therapy with HCV antibodies during the anhepatic phase has not been shown to be effective in studies to date. Antiviral therapy after transplantation but before evidence of reinfection, so called pre-emptive treatment, is limited by frequent complications and a high rate of side effects. The mainstay of management represents directed antiviral therapy after evidence of recurrence of chronic Hepatitis C. With a combination therapy of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, sustained virologic response rates of 25-45% are achieved. However, tolerability is often poor, and the need of dose reduction is frequent. To date, there is no general consensus on modality, timing and dosing of antiviral treatment of HCV in patients with advanced liver disease and after liver transplantation. More randomised, controlled trials are needed. Moreover, upcoming new treatment approaches, e.g. specifically targeted antiviral therapy for hepatitis C (STAT-C) with HCV-specific polymerase and protease inhibitors, may represent a therapeutic alternative.

Liver transplantation

Liver transplantation has become a lifesaving procedure for patients who have chronic end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. The satisfactory outcome of liver transplantation has led to insufficient supplies of deceased donor organs, particularly in East Asia. Hence, East Asian surgeons are concentrating on developing and performing living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This review article describes an update on the present status of liver transplantation, mainly in adults, and highlights some recent developments on indications for transplantation, patient selection, donor and recipient operation between LDLT and deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT), immunosuppression, and long-term management of liver transplant recipients. Currently, the same indication criteria that exist for DDLT are applied to LDLT, with technical refinements for LDLT. In highly experienced centers, LDLT for high-scoring (>30 points) Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) patients and acute-on-chronic liver-failure patients yields comparably good outcomes to DDLT, because timely liver transplantation with good-quality grafting is possible. With increasing numbers of liver transplantations and long-term survivors, specialized attention should be paid to complications that develop in the long term, such as chronic renal failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, bone or neurological complications, and development of de novo tumors, which are highly related to the immunosuppressive treatment.

Hepatitis C virus sensitivity to combined antiviral therapy in liver transplant versus immunocompetent patients

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) frequently causes allograft failure, because viral aggressiveness has been shown to be increased among immunosuppressed patients. Several studies have reported lower efficacy of antiviral therapy after OLT associated with worse tolerability. The aim of this study was to compare the logarithmic falls in viral loads at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin among OLT versus immunocompetent patients. OLT patients (group 1) were recruited from 3 Spanish centers. Two age- and sex-matched controls (group 2) were randomly assigned to each case. We excluded coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B or cholestatic hepatitis. Among group 1 (n = 66) were 72.7% men with an overall mean age of 52.7 +/- 10.1 years; 90.9% were genotype 1. The mean baseline viral load was 6.0 +/- 0.6 log10 IU/mL, and 19% of patients had cirrhosis. Among group 2 (n = 132) were 72.7% men with an overall mean age of 50.1 +/- 10.1 years; 92.4% were genotype 1. The mean baseline viral load was 5.9 +/- 0.5 log10 IU/mL, and 17% of patients had cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The logarithmic falls in viral loads at 4 weeks of treatment were similar in groups 1 and 2: 2.3 +/- 2.1 vs 2.4 +/- 1.9 log10 IU/mL (P = .49); they were also similar at 12 weeks of treatment: 3.9 +/- 1.9 vs 3.7 +/- 2.4 log10 IU/mL (P = .66). In conclusion, in our study HCV sensitivity to combined antiviral therapy was the same among transplant versus immunocompetent patients.

Worse recent efficacy of antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: impact of donor age and baseline cirrhosis

We hypothesized that antiviral efficacy [sustained virologic response (SVR)] has improved in recent years in the transplant setting. Our aim was to assess whether the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PegIFN)-ribavirin (Rbv) has improved over time. One hundred seven liver transplant patients [74% men, 55.5 years old (range: 37.5-69.5), 86% genotype 1a or 1b] were treated with PegIFN-Rbv for 355 (16-623) days at 20.1 (1.7-132.6) months after transplantation. Tacrolimus was used in 61%. Sixty-seven percent had baseline F3-F4 (cirrhosis: 20.5%). Donor age was 49 (12-78) years. SVR was achieved in 39 (36.5%) patients, with worse results achieved in recent years (2001-2003: n = 27, 46.5%; 2004: n = 23, 43.5%; 2005: n = 21, 35%; 2006 to January 2007: n = 36, 24%; P = 0.043). Variables associated with SVR in the univariate analysis included donor age, baseline viremia and cirrhosis, bilirubin levels, rapid virologic response and early virologic response (EVR), premature discontinuation of PegIFN or Rbv, and accumulated Rbv dose. In the multivariate analysis, the variables in the model were EVR [odds ratio (OR): 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.016-0.414, P = 0.002] and donor age (OR: 1.039, 95% CI: 1.008-1.071, P = 0.01). Variables that had changed over time included donor age, baseline viremia, disease severity (cirrhosis, baseline bilirubin, and leukocyte and platelet counts), interval between transplantation and therapy, and use of growth factors. In the multivariate analysis, variables independently changing were donor age (OR: 1.041, 95% CI: 1.013-1.071, P = 0.004), duration from transplantation to antiviral therapy (OR: 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000-1.001, P = 0.013), and baseline leukocyte count (OR: 1.000, 95% CI: 1.000-1.000, P = 0.034). In conclusion, the efficacy of antiviral therapy with PegIFN-Rbv has worsened over time, at least in our center. The increase in donor age and greater proportion of patients treated at advanced stages of disease are potential causes.

Taribavirin: a potential alternative to ribavirin

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin are currently the standard of care therapy for chronic hepatitis C. In the near future, protease inhibitors are likely to be part of a three-drug regimen with interferon and ribavirin. It is not yet clear if therapy duration will be shorter, but it appears that anemia will be more severe. Ribavirin has to date been proven indispensible as a member of the treatment regimen, despite the potentially dangerous side effect of anemia. Taribavirin (viramidine), a purine nucleoside analog, is a prodrug of ribavirin. In a Phase III registration trial, it failed to show adequate efficacy but did have significantly less anemia when compared with weight-adjusted ribavirin. The dosing of taribaivirin may have been the flaw of that study, and indeed interim results of a Phase IIb study currently underway appear to have better antiviral effects with weight-based dosing. Sustained viral response rates comparable to ribavirin in a larger prospective study will be needed to supplant the current regimen. However, even if taribavirin efficacy is slightly lower than ribavirin, but anemia rates are considerably lower, there may still be a role for taribaivirin in a triple regimen where a protease molecule will be the predominant antiviral agent.

Long-term antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation in nonresponders: biochemical, virological, and histological impact

More than 50% of patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection fail to respond to antiviral treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a long-term antiviral treatment maintained for more than 48 weeks. Seventy treated patients, with a histological follow-up > 1 year, were enrolled in this observational, retrospective study. The duration of antiviral treatment, tolerance, and occurrence of virological, biochemical, and histological responses were recorded. Thirty-two patients were nonresponders after 48 weeks of treatment. Combined antiviral therapy was maintained for >12 months in 26 and for >18 months in 21. Twelve patients had to discontinue their treatment. At 48 weeks, the rates of virological response and sustained virological response were 37% and 24.3%, respectively; at the end of the follow-up, they were 48.5% and 35.7%. Virological response was significantly associated with a higher incidence of biochemical and histological response, regardless of its time of occurrence (before or after 6 months). Even in the absence of virological response, the rate of progression of fibrosis was significantly slowed in patients treated for more than 6 months. Our results show the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of long-term antiviral therapy in nonresponder patients with a recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C virus infection.

Liver transplantation in viral hepatitis: prevention of recurrence

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) are major indications for liver transplantation. Outcome depends largely on the prevention of allograft reinfection. The advent of long-term hepatitis B immune globulin administration and the introduction of new antiviral agents were a major breakthrough in the management of these patients. Today, survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is similar to that of patients transplanted for HBsAg-negative liver disease, and the risk of recurrence is below 10%. In contrast, HCV reinfection is almost constant and significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequently progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Pre-transplantation and prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatments are limited by low applicability and poor tolerance. Treatment of established graft lesions with combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25-45% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

Hepatitis C virus therapy in liver transplant recipients: response predictors, effect on fibrosis progression, and importance of the initial stage of fibrosis

Antiviral therapy after liver transplantation (LT) using interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) rate ranging from 20% to 45%. The aims of our study were to assess efficacy and tolerability of therapy, effect on fibrosis progression and the importance of the initial fibrosis stage to outcome. A total of 113 hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected LT patients received 133 courses of IFN (standard, n = 29, pegylated IFN [pegIFN], n = 104) and RBV (75% genotype 1). Early virological response (EVR), end-of-treatment (EOT), and SVR were obtained in 74%, 55%, and 38%, respectively. EVR, completion of treatment, viral load before therapy, genotype non-1, and use of pegIFN were predictive of SVR, but only EVR remained in the multivariate analysis. SVR was obtained in 45% patients who received a second course of therapy. Paired biopsies at baseline, at EOT and at long-term were available in 42 patients. The mean fibrosis stage remained stable in patients with SVR and increased in patients without response. Rejection episodes were observed in 6% of patients. Tolerability of therapy decrease in patients with fibrosis stage > or =3 on baseline liver biopsy. A total of 20% of them died or were retransplanted due to liver failure as opposed to 1% of patients who had fibrosis stage <3. In conclusion, IFN and RBV achieved SVR in 38% of patients. EVR is independently associated with SVR. Fibrosis stage remained stable in patients with SVR and increased in nonresponders. Fibrosis stage > or =3 was associated with a high rate of liver failure, arguing for an early introduction of antiviral therapy.

Pegylated-interferon and ribavirin in liver transplant candidates and recipients with HCV cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies

Pegylated interferon with ribavirin (Peg/R) is the most effective therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) but its utility and effectiveness after liver transplantation has been difficult to assess. We evaluated efficacy, tolerability, and safety of Peg/R in liver transplant candidates and recipients with HCV cirrhosis. We searched medical databases and conference proceedings between January 1999 and January 2008 selecting randomized and nonrandomized studies. Primary end points meta-analytically were: (1) sustained viral response (SVR) and (2) histological response. Secondary end points were: (1) treatment discontinuation, (2) mortality, and (3) rejection episodes. Pegylated interferons using either 1-1.5 mcg/kg of pegylated interferon alpha-2b or 180 microg (pegylated interferon alpha-2a combined with ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day were the most effective compared to any other regimen or no therapy. In three pretransplant studies the median SVR was 19.6% (19.6-50%). In six postransplant studies where a meta-analysis was done the cumulative risk difference in SVR was 0.31% (95% CI, 0.18-0.44, p < 0.001). However histological response was not significantly better compared to no therapy or other antiviral regimens. There were no significant differences in discontinuation of therapy, acute or chronic rejection or mortality between optimal Peg/R vs no treatment or other regimens. Hence pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in full doses is effective pre and post transplant but has a low SVR rate. To date no significant histological improvement has been reported.

Long-term histological effects of preemptive antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infection

The long-term effects of preemptive antiviral therapy on fibrosis progression in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were examined in a cohort of consecutive liver transplant recipients who received preemptive antiviral therapy for 48 weeks (95% were virologic nonresponders). Control patients were transplanted during this same period but did not receive preemptive therapy. Patients were followed to the date of last biopsy and censored at the time of subsequent HCV treatment. Eighty-six patients surviving >/=90 days were included. Treated and control patients were similar, except that treated patients had longer histological follow-up (60 versus 50 months), a lower median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at liver transplant (17 versus 23), and a shorter median length of hospital stay (6 versus 9.5 days). In the uncensored analysis, the cumulative probability of a Batts-Ludwig fibrosis score >/= 2 at 48 months post-liver transplant was 22% in the preemptive therapy group and 49% in the nonpreemptive therapy group (P = 0.08). In multivariate analysis, preemptive therapy was associated with a 48% reduced risk of a fibrosis score >/= 2 (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.24-1.12, P = 0.09), but this failed to achieve statistical significance. Receipt of preemptive therapy was associated with a delay in subsequent HCV therapy for moderate to severe disease (fibrosis score >/= 2 or moderate necroinflammatory activity) with a median time of 36.3 months versus 20.3 months in the preemptive and nonpreemptive groups (P = 0.004). We conclude that preemptive antiviral therapy in virologic nonresponders delays the time to subsequent HCV treatment and may confer a reduced risk of fibrosis progression. Further study of preemptive antiviral therapy is warranted.

Systematic review of the treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin

The aim of our study was to conduct a systematic review of studies evaluating antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa in combination with ribavirin for the management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Data sources included electronic databases and a manual search. Studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of PEG-IFN alfa with ribavirin in patients with recurrent hepatitis C were selected for inclusion. The information extracted from each of the selected publications included study design details, patient characteristics, treatment regimens and efficacy and tolerability end points. Nineteen studies including 611 patients were identified. PEG-IFN alfa-2b was used in 16 studies. The mean rate of SVR was 30.2% (range, 8-50%). Dose reduction and discontinuation of treatment were common in these studies (73% and 27.6%, respectively). The lack of an early virologic response (EVR) at 3 months of therapy was the most frequently described predictive factor of nonresponse. Treatment discontinuation and dose reductions due to adverse events were frequent and possibly represent important obstacles to attainment of SVR. EVR at 3 months of treatment should be considered an important predictor of treatment outcome.

Effects of double-filtration plasmapheresis combined with interferon plus ribavirin for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

Response rates to interferon and ribavirin treatment for recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are suboptimal, particularly for those with genotype 1b and high viral load. The present study evaluated the effects of combining double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) with pharmacotherapy using interferon plus ribavirin after living donor liver transplantation. DFPP was applied in the first week to mechanically eliminate HCV from the blood in the induction phase. One patient could not tolerate DFPP, and another 2 patients discontinued interferon treatment because of adverse effects. Negative results were obtained for HCV-RNA in week 48 (end-treatment response) in 3 patients, and sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 2 patients (20%). These response rates were not improved compared to those of the historical non-DFPP group. Although this preliminary study examined only a small number of patients, no additive effect of DFPP was observed in terms of the SVR rate.

Clinical benefits of antiviral therapy in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin eradicates hepatitis C virus (HCV) in one third of liver recipients with recurrent disease. Side effects are frequent and potentially life threatening. Our aim was to define the long-term benefits of antiviral therapy in recurrent HCV. Eighty-nine (89) recipients (genotype 1: 86.5%) were treated with IFN (n = 31) or pegIFN (n = 58) plus ribavirin and 75 untreated contemporaneous disease-matched controls. The major end point was survival from transplantation. Survival, progression to cirrhosis and clinical decompensation since start of therapy were compared between sustained virologic responders (SVRs) and nonresponders (NRs). Results revealed 44 patients died during the follow-up (20% treated vs. 35% controls; p = 0.05). Patient survival was higher in treated compared to controls (7 years: 74% vs. 62%; p = 0.04). Among treated patients, an SVR was achieved in 37% (IFN 16% vs. peg-IFN 48%; p = 0.03). About 2/33 SVRs and 16/56 NRs died (p = 0.01) due to HCV-disease (56%), IFN-induced rejection (11%), both causes (11%) or others (22%). Five-year survival was greater in SVRs than in NRs (93% vs. 69%, p = 0.032). In patients without baseline cirrhosis, progression to cirrhosis occurred more frequently in NRs (27/42 vs. 6/16; p = 0.06). The 5-year risk of graft decompensation was higher in NRs (33% vs. 16%; p = 0.04). Antiviral therapy is associated with improved long-term outcome in recurrent HCV.

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: on-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon/ribavirin therapy

Sustained virologic response (SVR) in the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) remains suboptimal. We evaluated efficacy of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) (PEG/RBV) combination therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and predictive values of rapid virological response (RVR) and early virologic response (EVR). Between January 2001 and October 2005, LT recipients with recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with PEG/RBV combination therapy independent of genotype or virologic response [53 patients (79% genotype 1)]. On-treatment predictor of response at week 4 (RVR) was defined as undetectable HCV RNA, and at week 12 (EVR) as undetectable HCV RNA or a >2 log(10) drop from pretreatment viral load. SVR was seen in 19 (35%) patients. Patients with genotype 2/3 were more likely to achieve SVR than those with genotype 1 (87% versus 23%; P = 0.001). The highest rate of SVR was seen in patients with RVR [specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) = 100%] while the highest rate of treatment failure was seen in those who did not have EVR [sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) = 100%]. The NPV of RVR to identify those who will not achieve SVR was also very high (88%). EVR had low PPV (63%) to identify those with SVR. In conclusion, PEG/RBV combination therapy is effective in the treatment of post-LT recurrent HCV. On-treatment virologic monitoring is highly predictive of SVR and may optimize the virologic response and minimize toxicity. Given its high PPV and NPV, RVR appears to be the most appropriate decision time point for continuation of therapy.

Role of transplantation in the management of hepatic malignancy

Background

The acceptance of liver transplantation in the management of hepatic malignancy declined after early poor outcomes. Despite recent developments, including stricter selection criteria and improved adjuvant therapies, the role of liver transplantation in the management of cancer remains controversial. This review explores the evidence for the current role of liver transplantation in the management of hepatic malignancy in the context of recent advances in surgical resection and non-surgical treatments.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the Cochrane Library and Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE, using terms for hepatic malignancy and interventions that included liver transplantation, percutaneous interventions, chemotherapy and surgical resection.

Results and conclusion

In patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma, improved selection has led to outcomes equivalent to those from surgical resection and comparable to those in patients transplanted for non-malignant indications. Recent studies suggest that selection criteria may be refined further. Surgical resection or percutaneous therapies may reduce the risk of progression while waiting for a transplant. Recent improvements have occurred in neoadjuvant therapies for cholangiocarcinoma. Nevertheless, a number of questions regarding the role of liver transplantation for hepatic malignancy remain.

Sustained virologic response to therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is related to early virologic response and dose adherence

Sustained virologic response (SVR) after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients is consistently lower than that achieved in non-LT patients. We evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in LT recipients with recurrent HCV and factors associated with SVR. All subjects with histologic evidence of recurrent HCV were intended to be treated for 48 weeks with full-dose pegylated IFN; target dose of RBV was 800 mg/day. Thirty-five LT recipients with recurrent HCV, median age 48.5 years, 77% genotype 1, and median pretreatment HCV RNA 6.4 log10 IU/mL were treated between January 2000 and February 2006. Antiviral therapy was discontinued prematurely in 15 subjects as a result of adverse events. Median overall treatment duration was 46 weeks. Early virologic response at week 12 was seen in 17 (49%) and an end-of-treatment virological response in 19 (54%) patients. SVR was achieved in 13 patients (37%), and all 9 patients followed for >1 year after treatment had durable response. Patients with SVR had significantly lower pretreatment HCV RNA (5.7 vs. 6.5 log10 IU/mL, P=0.003), more likely to have a week 12 virological response (85% vs. 27%, P=0.0009) and received higher cumulative doses of pegylated IFN (75% vs. 33%, P=0.029) and RBV (90% vs. 26%, P=0.016) compared with patients whose disease did not respond to therapy. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 37% of patients with recurrent hepatitis C after LT. Similar to non-LT patients, those with lower pretreatment HCV RNA, a week 12 virological response, and pegylated IFN and RBV dose adherence were more likely to achieve SVR.

Ribavirin with either standard or pegylated interferon to treat recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of two anti-viral protocols in hepatitis C virus-reinfected liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 26 liver transplant patients were treated with standard interferon-alpha2b for 12 months or standard interferon-alpha2b for 3 months followed by pegylated interferon-alpha2b for 9 months. Interferon was combined with ribavirin in all patients. The histological course of the study population was compared with an untreated historic control group (n = 38) with similar baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The sustained virological response rates in the standard interferon group and in the pegylated interferon group were 27.3% and 26.7%, respectively. Only 29% of patients with sustained virological response had end of treatment histological response, whereas 47% of viral non-responders showed end of treatment histological response. The percentage of patients with histological improvement was significantly higher in the study population when compared to the controls. Univariate analysis indicated that hepatitis C virus genotype non-1, high baseline alanine aminotransferase, the time interval between liver transplant and interferon therapy and the body mass index predicted sustained virological response. In the multivariate model, baseline alanine aminotransferase and the body mass index remained a significant predictor of sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatment regimens offer similar efficacy profiles. Failure to eradicate hepatitis C virus should not lead to treatment discontinuation if serial liver biopsies demonstrate histological response.

Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients: outcome in the Bonn cohort

Recurrent hepatitis C is a major cause of mortality in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected patients after orthotopic liver transplantation. We report sustained viral clearance in all four transplanted HIV/HCV-positive patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Early therapy after HCV recurrence, tailoring treatment duration to the individual decline in HCV-RNA and the management of side effects are key factors for improved efficacy. At experienced centres interferon treatment is a valuable option for recurrent hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients.

Efficacy of antiviral therapy on hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a relevant problem of liver transplantation programs. We evaluated the effect of antiviral therapy on disease progression in 81 HCV-infected liver transplantation recipients.

METHODS

Patients with mild hepatitis C recurrence (fibrosis stage F0 to F2, n = 54) were randomized to no treatment (group A, n = 27) or peginterferon alfa-2b/ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B, n = 27). Patients with severe recurrence (F3 to F4, cholestatic hepatitis) were treated (group C, n = 27). All patients (n = 81) underwent a liver biopsy at baseline and after follow-up; paired hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurements were available in 51 patients.

RESULTS

Thirteen (48%) patients of group B and 5 (18.5%) of group C achieved sustained virological response. Liver fibrosis progressed > or =1 stage in 40 (49%) of 81 patients: 19 (70%) of group A versus 7 (26%) of group B (P = .001) and in 14 (54%) of group C. HVPG increased (6.5 to 13 mm Hg, P < .01) in patients in whom fibrosis worsened, whereas it decreased (5 to 3.5 mm Hg, P = .017) or remained unchanged in those with fibrosis improvement or stabilization, respectively. The only variable independently associated with fibrosis improvement/stabilization was treatment (odds ratio [OR] =3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 10, P = .009). Among treated patients, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization and viral clearance were independently associated with histological or hemodynamic improvement/stabilization (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5 to 18, P < .01; OR 7.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 38, P = .01; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that in liver transplantation recipients, antiviral therapy slows disease progression (particularly in sustained virological responders), as shown by its effects on liver histology and on HVPG.

Management of hepatitis C virus in the transplant patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a leading cause of chronic hepatitis, with 170 to 190 million people infected worldwide. The treatment of choice for patients who have HCV-related cirrhosis with or without hepatocellular carcinoma is liver transplantation. Virologic recurrence is constant after transplantation and results in chronic hepatitis in the vast majority. HCV infection now can be cured in a substantial proportion of liver transplant recipients. This review highlights the available strategies to improve outcome, including modification of factors that affect disease progression and the efficacy of antiviral therapy.

Hepatitis C immune globulin (human) for the prevention of viral recurrence after liver transplantation

Immunoglobulin therapy has been used extensively in the treatment of infectious diseases. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) reduces the onset of infection in post-percutaneous exposure to Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and in infants of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers; it also significantly reduces the risk of recurrent HBV infection in liver transplant recipients, thus increasing the survival rate of this population. Prior to 1990, when plasma donors were not screened for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, the prevalence of HCV viremia after a liver transplant was found to be lower in those patients receiving HBIg containing anti-HCV antibodies. Phase I trials with chimpanzees demonstrated the ability of hepatitis C immune globulin (human) to decrease hepatic inflammation and to neutralize the HCV antibody, but this effect was not sustained over time. Phase I/II human studies have currently been unable to replicate the animal studies, but further trials are planned.