Primed CD8(+) T-cell responses to allogeneic endothelial cells are controlled by local complement activation

Targeted complement inhibitors protect against posttransplant cardiac ischemia and reperfusion injury and reveal an important role for the alternative pathway of complement activation

Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is an unavoidable event during solid organ transplantation and is a major contributor to early graft dysfunction and subsequent graft immunogenicity. In a therapeutic paradigm using targeted complement inhibitors, we investigated the role of complement, and specifically the alternative pathway of complement, in IRI to heart isografts. Mouse heterotopic isograft heart transplants were performed in C57BL/6 mice treated with a single injection of either CR2-Crry (inhibits all complement pathways) or CR2-fH (inhibits alternative complement pathway) immediately posttransplantation. Transplanted hearts were harvested at 12 and 48 h for analysis. Both inhibitors resulted in a significant reduction in myocardial IRI, as measured by histology and serum cardiac troponin I levels. Furthermore, compared with untreated controls, both inhibitors reduced graft complement deposition, neutrophil and macrophage infiltration, adhesion molecule expression (P-selectin, E-selectin, and I-CAM-1), and proinflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α, IL-1β, KC, and MCP-1). The reduction in myocardial damage and cellular infiltration was not significantly different between CR2-Crry- and CR2-fH-treated mice, although adhesion molecule and cytokine levels were significantly lower in CR2-Crry-treated mice compared with CR2-fH-treated mice. In conclusion, the alternative complement pathway plays a major contributing role in myocardial IRI after heart transplantation, and local (targeted) complement inhibition has the potential to provide an effective and safe therapeutic strategy to reduce graft injury. Although total complement blockade may be somewhat more efficacious in terms of reducing inflammation, specific blockade of the alternative pathway is likely to be less immunosuppressive in an already immunocompromised recipient.

Humoral autoimmunity and transplant vasculopathy: when allo is not enough

For several decades, allograft rejection was believed to be mediated almost exclusively by cellular immune responses, but it is now realized that humoral responses also play a major role. Although directed typically against donor human leukocyte antigen, it is becoming increasingly evident that the antibody response can also target autoantigens that are shared between donor and recipient and that this autoantibody may contribute to graft rejection. Many aspects of transplant-induced humoral autoimmunity remain poorly understood and key questions persist; not least what triggers the response and how autoantibody causes graft damage. Here, we collate results from recent clinical and experimental studies in transplantation and autoimmune diseases to propose answers to these questions.

Complement in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to bring to attention the most recent advances made in understanding the role of complement components in both innate and adaptive immune responses in solid organ transplantation with emphasis on the kidney.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alongside recent findings related to the role of anaphylatoxins in modulating adaptive immune responses, there has been a genomic study to assess the expression of inflammatory markers in kidney transplantation, showing significant involvement of some complement molecules in predicting graft function. Modulators of complement pathway activity such as decay accelerating factor (CD55) and CD59 have also been shown to have a role in graft rejection. Potential new therapeutic targets related to complement proteins are being investigated.

SUMMARY

The mechanism of rejection in solid organ transplantation is influenced by the initial inflammatory response and subsequent adaptive allo-immune response, both of which have been shown to be affected by various complement components. Due to limitations of existing treatments, new approaches are needed to better control these responses to improve graft survival. Built on an expanding knowledge of complement involvement, targeted blocking of the effector complement molecules and modulating the expression of complement inhibitors has suggested potentially useful approaches for reducing the effect of inflammatory damage from cold ischaemia as well as reducing the activation of the adaptive immune system related to complement.

Deficiency of C5aR prolongs renal allograft survival

Interaction between C5a, a product of complement activation, and its receptor (C5aR) upregulates antigen-specific T cell responses by modulating the activation of antigen-presenting cells and T cells. Whether this C5a-C5aR interaction contributes to the immune responses that promote renal allograft rejection is unknown. Here, we found that deficiency of C5aR in both graft and recipient reduced allospecific T cell responses and prolonged renal allograft survival. In addition, lack of C5aR impaired the function of donor and recipient antigen-presenting cells and inhibited the response of recipient T cells to allostimulation. Furthermore, deficiency of C5aR in both graft and recipient reduced early inflammation in the grafts, with less cellular infiltration around the vessels and fewer F4/80 positive cells in the peritubular interstitium. These data demonstrate that C5aR is critical for a full adaptive immune response and mediates renal allograft rejection. Engagement of C5aR on dendritic cells and T cells modulates their function, enhancing allospecific T cell responses that lead to allograft rejection. Targeting C5a signaling may have therapeutic potential for T cell-mediated graft rejection.

Recent progress and new perspectives in studying T cell responses to allografts

Studies in the past decade advanced our understanding of the development, execution and regulation of T-cell-mediated allograft rejection. This review outlines recent progress and focuses on three major areas of investigation that are likely to guide the development of graft-prolonging therapies in the future. The discussed topics include the contribution of recently discovered molecules to the activation and functions of alloreactive T cells, the emerging problem of alloreactive memory T cells and recently gained insights into the old question of transplantation tolerance.

Pretransplant immune risk assessment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite the introduction of advanced immunosuppressive drug therapies, clinical and subclinical rejections still occur in many graft recipients with a negative impact on the long-term transplant outcome. The immunological status of the patients awaiting the transplantation is a key factor for these processes. Here we summarize the recent efforts to identify and develop biomarkers and functional assays that allow an individual pretransplant risk assessment.

RECENT FINDINGS

New sensitive techniques assessing T-cell memory and B-cell activation have been developed. Furthermore, the expression level of soluble and molecular markers reflecting the activation state of the immune system and donor graft intrinsic factors have been shown to influence graft outcome.

SUMMARY

A variety of parameters and assays that determine the pretransplant immune activation status has been developed. Some of these assays have already been used prospectively to define high-risk patients receiving advanced immunosuppressive induction therapy.However, the conflicting results obtained in different studies show that biomarker analysis and functional assays performance need to be further standardized and validated in large prospective trials before they can be routinely implemented into a pretransplant risk assessment. Subsequently, a combined effort to design pretransplant risk stratification algorithms should lead to personalized immunosuppressive treatment regimes and improved graft survival and long-term graft function.

Novel aspects of complement in kidney injury

Complement activation is integral to the development and progression of multiple forms of kidney disease. The liver is the principal source of serum complement, but various kidney cell types and bone marrow-derived immune cells can produce a full array of complement proteins. Locally produced and activated complement yields cleavage products that function as vital intermediaries, amplifying inflammation in ischemia-reperfusion injury and transplant rejection, among other pathological states. Additional new studies indicate that during cognate T-cell-antigen presenting cell interactions, both cell types produce alternative pathway complement components. The resultant activation products have an essential role in T-cell activation, expansion, and differentiation, which in turn has a profound impact on the development of immune-mediated kidney disease. The recognition of an expanded role for kidney cell-derived and immune cell-produced complement as pathogenic to the kidney supports the need for future studies to test the efficacy of complement inhibitors in the prevention and/or treatment of selected kidney diseases.