[Medical therapy of lower urinary tract symptoms [corrected]]

Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) include storage and voiding disorders and should be carefully evaluated before the start of any treatment. Medical therapy is directed at improving symptoms and reducing the risk of progression in order to improve quality of life and prevent complications, such as acute urinary retention, or the need for surgical intervention. Careful assessment of the individual complaints helps to identify the best drug which should be adapted to each individual patient's risk profile. At present, α(1)-adrenoreceptor inhibitors and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors and their combination form the gold standard for pharmacological treatment. In addition, anticholinergic agents are increasingly being used as monotherapy or in combination with α1-adrenocepetor inhibitors for patients with predominant storage disorders while phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors may be suitable for patients suffering from LUTS and concomitant erectile dysfunction.

Comparison of efficacy for erectile function and lower urinary tract symptoms of tadalafil 20 mg on-demand and 5 mg once daily in patients with erectile dysfunction

Aim:  To compare the improvement in erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) as well as safety of tadalafil dosed at 20 mg on-demand and 5 mg once daily among ED patients. Materials and methods:  A total of 194 ED patients visited between March 2010 and June 2011 were recruited. Out of 194 individuals, 168 (86.6%) met inclusion criteria after completing the two-week screening period (V0). The Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: (i) 20 mg of tadalafil as needed (Group 1: n = 84, 50.0%) and (ii) 5 mg of tadalafil once daily (Group 2: n = 84, 50.0%). Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) were assessed immediately before initiation of treatment (V1) and after four (V2) and twelve weeks of treatment (V3). In men with an IPSS of ≥ 8 at V1, IPSS, maximal flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual volume (PVR) were also assessed. Results:  Of the 168 patients, 134 (79.8%; Group 1: n = 68, 81.0%; Group 2: n = 66, 78.6%) patients completed the trial. IIEF-5 improved in both groups, and the mean change was larger in Group 2 at V3 (4.9 ± 4.2 vs. 6.5 ± 4.5; p = 0.032) Similarly, though IPSS (with ≥ 8, n = 88, 65.7%; Group 1: n = 44, 64.7%; Group 2: n = 44, 66.7%) improved in both groups, the mean change was larger in Group 2 at V3 (-2.8 ± 4.3 vs. -4.8 ± 4.1; p = 0.026). Qmax and PVR did not differ significantly in either group. Conclusions:  Once daily tadalafil was more efficacious in treating both ED and LUTS than on-demand dosing. However, no differences were observed between the two dosing schedules with regard to the improvement in LUTS when stratified by improvement in ED. The side effects were insignificant for both dosing schedules.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess safety and efficacy of vardenafil 10 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg vs. tamsulosin 0.4 mg alone in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and vardenafil are well established: however, there is no report regarding combined therapy with these drugs for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

AIM

To compare the safety and efficacy of tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day vs. tamsulosin 0.4 mg/day plus vardenafil 10 mg/day in patients with LUTS/BPH in a randomized trial with 12-week follow-up.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on 60 men with persistent storage LUTS after 2-week run-in with tamsulosin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS-bother, International Index of Erectile Function, Version 5 (IIEF-5) and Over Active Bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) scores, uroflowmetry data (Qmax, Qave), and postvoiding residual urine were recorded after run-in (baseline), and 2 and 12 weeks after treatment. Differences between vardenafil and placebo at different times were calculated with unpaired samples t-test. Between-group differences in change from baseline to 2 and 12 weeks were evaluated with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

We found a between-group significant difference from baseline to 12 weeks in the following: (i) Qmax (placebo: +0.07, vardenafil: +2.56, P = 0.034); (ii) Qave (placebo: -0.15, vardenafil: +1.02, P = 0.031); (iii) irritative-IPSS subscores (placebo: -1.67, vardenafil: -3.11, P = 0.039); and (iv) IIEF (placebo: +0.06, vardenafil: +2.61, P = 0.030). No patient reported any serious (grade ≥ 2) adverse event (AE). There were no differences in the incidence of common, treatment-related AEs between men undergoing combined therapy or tamsulosin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of tamsulosin and vardenafil for 12 weeks was well tolerated and more effective to improve both LUTS and erectile function, as compared with tamsulosin alone. Further studies are needed to assess the role of combined therapy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and alpha blockers in treating LUTS/BPH.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with α-blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

CONTEXT

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) have showed significant improvements in both lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in men affected by one or both conditions, without a significant increase in adverse events. However, the results are inconsistent.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of available prospective and cross-sectional studies on the use of PDE5-Is alone or in combination with α1-adrenergic blockers in patients with LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search was performed using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through September 2011 including the combination of the following terms: LUTS, BPH, PDE5-Is, sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, udenafil, α-blockers, and α1-adrenergic blocker. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines for observational studies in epidemiology.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of 107 retrieved articles, 12 were included in the present meta-analysis: 7 on PDE5-Is versus placebo, with 3214 men, and 5 on the combination of PDE5-Is with α1-adrenergic blockers versus α1-adrenergic blockers alone, with 216 men. Median follow-up of all RCTs was 12 wk. Combining the results of those trials, the use of PDE5-Is alone was associated with a significant improvement of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score (+5.5; p<0.0001) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (-2.8; p<0.0001) but not the maximum flow rate (Q(max)) (-0.00; p=not significant) at the end of the study as compared with placebo. The association of PDE5-Is and α1-adrenergic blockers improved the IIEF score (+3.6; p<0.0001), IPSS score (-1.8; p = 0.05), and Q(max) (+1.5; p<0.0001) at the end of the study as compared with α-blockers alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis of the available cross-sectional data suggests that PDE5-Is can significantly improve LUTS and erectile function in men with BPH. PDE5-Is seem to be a promising treatment option for patients with LUTS secondary to BPH with or without ED.

Testosterone regulates smooth muscle contractile pathways in the rat prostate: emphasis on PDE5 signaling

Testosterone (T) plays a permissive role in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) have been found to be effective for BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in clinical trials. This study investigated the effect of T on smooth muscle (SM) contractile and regulatory signaling pathways, including PDE5 expression and functional activity in prostate in male rats (sham-operated, surgically castrated, and castrated with T supplementation). In vitro organ bath studies, real-time RT-PCR, Western blot analysis, and immunohistochemistry were performed. Castration heavily attenuated contractility, including sensitivity to phenylephrine with SM myosin immunostaining revealing a disrupted SM cell arrangement in the stroma. PDE5 was immunolocalized exclusively in the prostate stroma, and orchiectomy signficantly reduced PDE5 immunopositivity, mRNA, and protein expression, along with nNOS and ROKβ mRNA, whereas it increased eNOS plus α(1a) and α(1b) adrenoreceptor expression in castrated animals. The PDE5i zaprinast significantly increased prostate strip relaxation to the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in control but not castrated rats. But SNP alone was more effective on castrated rats, comparable with sham treated with SNP plus zaprinast. T supplementation prevented or restored all above changes, including SNP and zaprinast in vitro responsiveness. In conclusion, our data show that T positively regulates PDE5 expression and functional activities in prostate, and T ablation not only suppresses prostate size but also reduces prostatic SM contractility, with several potential SM contraction/relaxation pathways implicated. Zaprinast findings strongly suggest a major role for PDE5/cGMP in this signaling cascade. PDE5 inhibition may represent a novel mechanism for treatment of BPH.

Phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction

Several disorders of the human upper and lower urinary tract, such as urinary stone disease, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and detrusor overactivity, can be therapeutically addressed by influencing the function of the smooth musculature of the ureter, prostate or urinary bladder, respectively. In order to ensure a drug effect without significant adverse events, a certain degree of tissue selectivity is mandatory. The treatment of said conditions aims to focus on orally available drugs acting via intracellular signalling pathways. Specifically, the cyclic nucleotide monophosphate cyclic GMP represents an important mediator in the control of the outflow region (bladder, urethra). The use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors, such as sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, avanafil or udenafil, known to restrain the degradation of the second messenger cyclic GMP, offers great opportunities in the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. PDE inhibitors are regarded as efficacious, have a rapid onset of action and favourable effect-to-side-effect ratio. The role of PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment of BPH/LUTS and the overactive bladder has already been addressed in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, as well as preliminary open-label studies enrolling either several hundreds or only 20 patients. The purpose of this review is to focus on the potential use and clinical significance of PDE inhibitors in the treatment of storage and voiding dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract. The strategy of modulating the activity of PDE isoenzymes might represent a novel approach in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD).

Urological aspects of the metabolic syndrome

The metabolic syndrome is common in countries with Western lifestyles. It comprises a number of disorders-including insulin resistance, hypertension and obesity-that all act as risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Urological diseases have also been linked to the metabolic syndrome. Most established aspects of the metabolic syndrome are linked to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer. Fasting plasma insulin, in particular, has been linked to BPH and incident, aggressive and lethal prostate cancer. The metabolic syndrome has also been shown to be associated with nonprostatic urological conditions such as male hypogonadism, nephrolithiasis, overactive bladder and erectile dysfunction, although data on these conditions are still sparse. Overall, the results of studies on urological aspects of the metabolic syndrome seem to indicate that BPH and prostate cancer could be regarded as two new aspects of the metabolic syndrome, and that an increased insulin level is a common underlying aberration that promotes both BPH and clinical prostate cancer. Urologists need to be aware of the effect that the metabolic syndrome has on urological disorders and should transfer this knowledge to their patients.

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms: critical analysis of current evidence

CONTEXT

A large body of epidemiologic data suggests a causal relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Recently reported studies on phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and LUTS have further contributed to the understanding of mechanisms involved in this relationship and of potential treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

A nonsystematic descriptive review was performed to summarize the literature concerning the role of PDE5-Is in men with LUTS, particularly looking at data derived from clinical trials in relation to the different PDE5-Is or their association with α-blockers.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted in October 2010 using the Medline database to identify all publications relating to ED and BPH and treatment with sildenafil, vardenafil, tadalafil, udenafil, UK-369003, and combination therapy with alfuzosin and tamsulosin.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In studies in which either ED or LUTS was the entry criterion, sildenafil appears to improve both erectile function and LUTS in subjects with ED. Placebo-controlled trials of tadalafil and vardenafil showed improvement of LUTS secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), but none of the studies showed a significant effect on urodynamic measures. Exploratory studies with UK-369003 showed improvements in LUTS and ED. Sildenafil or tadalafil associated with alfuzosin or tamsulosin showed greater benefits for the combination therapy for both LUTS and ED. The coadministration of udenafil and an α-blocker in patients with BPH and ED also appeared to improve both LUTS and ED severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent evidence of improvements in LUTS has been shown with PDE5-Is, either alone or in combination with α-blockers. However, effects on urodynamics or objective measures of urinary flow are lacking. Further areas of research include investigation of mechanism of PDE5-Is, urodynamic studies, identification of new efficacy end points, head-to-head comparison with standard of care, potential benefit of add-on treatment, and long-term outcomes.

Association of lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction: pathophysiological aspects and implications for clinical management

There is strong evidence from multiple epidemological studies that lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are correlated, independent of age or comorbidities as diabetes or hypertension. Although a direct causal relationship is not established yet, four pathophysiological mechanisms can explain the relationship. These include alteration in nitric oxide bioavailability, α1-adrenergic receptor hyperactivity, pelvic atherosclerosis and sex hormones. This association has different clinical implications on the management of both disorders. Men seeking care for one condition should always be screened for complaints of the other condition. Sexual function should be assessed and discussed with the patient when choosing the appropriate management strategy for LUTS, as well as when evaluating the patient's response to treatment. Multiple large clinical trials have shown an improvement in LUTS after phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5)-inhibitor treatment. PDE5 inhibitors show promise as a future treatment for LUTS, either in conjunction with existing therapies or as a primary treatment. There may be a potential therapeutic role for testosterone in LUTS treatment in cases of testosterone deficiency that needs to be investigated. Much further investigation is required, but it is evident that the association between LUTS and ED is fundamental for future therapies and possible preventative strategies.

Combination therapy for erectile dysfunction: an update review

The introduction of oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) in the late 1990s and early 2000s revolutionized the field of sexual medicine and PDE5Is are currently first-line monotherapy for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, a significant proportion of patients with complex ED will be therapeutic non-responders to PDE5I monotherapy. Combination therapy has recently been adopted for more refractory cases of ED, but a critical evaluation of current combination therapies is lacking. A thorough PubMed and Cochrane Library search was conducted focusing on the effectiveness of combination therapies for ED in therapeutic non-responders to PDE5I therapy. Journal articles spanning the time period between January 1990 and December 2010 were reviewed. Criteria included all pertinent review articles, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective analyses. References from retrieved articles were also manually scanned for additional relevant publications. Published combination therapies include PDE5I plus vacuum erectile device (VED), intraurethral medication, intracavernosal injection (ICI), androgen supplement, α-blocker or miscellaneous combinations. Based on this review, some of these combination treatments appeared to be quite effective in preliminary testing. Caution must be advised, however, as the majority of combination therapy articles in the last decade have numerous limitations including study biases and small subject size. Regardless of limitations, present combination therapy research provides a solid foundation for future studies in complex ED management.

Treatment of erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms by phosphodiesterase inhibitors

To date, it is widely accepted that several disorders of the male and female urogenital tract, such as erectile dysfunction, bladder overactivity, urinary stone disease, the benign prostatic syndrome, as well as symptoms of female sexual arousal and orgasmic dysfunctions, can be therapeutically approached by influencing the function of the smooth musculature of the respective organs. To achieve a pronounced drug effect without significant adverse events, a certain degree of tissue selectivity is mandatory. Selective intervention in intracellular pathways regulating smooth muscle tone has become the most promising strategy to modulate tissue and organ function. Since the concept of taking a pill to relieve symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction is now widely accepted following the successes of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor treatment of erectile dysfunction, the treatment of urological diseases has focused on orally available drugs acting via influencing intracellular signaling pathways, thereby combining a high response rate with the advantage of an on-demand intake. Specifically, the use of isoenzyme-selective PDE inhibitors offers great opportunities in the medical treatment of various genitourinary diseases. These agents are regarded to be safe and to be efficacious, i.e., having a fast onset of drug action and an improved effect-to-side-effect ratio. As experience with this class of compounds and their use in urology is rapidly growing, basic and clinical research in this field will most likely expand the pharmacological armamentarium of innovative treatment options in the next few years. The purpose of this review is to summarize current, as well as potential, upcoming indications for the use of PDE inhibitors in the pharmacotherapy of male erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms.

Testosterone replacement therapy by testosterone ointment relieves lower urinary tract symptoms in late onset hypogonadism patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients with late onset hypogonadism (LOH) also suffered from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and LOH symptoms. The objects of this study are to evaluate the efficacy of testosterone replace therapy (TRT) by testosterone ointment (Glowmin: GL) for LUTS in LOH patients.

METHODS

The Aging Male Symptom (AMS) scale, Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) were obtained from patients with LOH. A total of 41 patients with LOH have been treated with TRT using 6 mg/day of GL for 3 months. Serum free testosterone levels (FT) and these four scores were compared before and after TRT.

RESULTS

Serum FT levels and the scores for the four parameters of AMS, six of eight domains in SF-36, IIEF-5 and total IPSS improved significantly after 3 months TRT. In addition, all IPSS domains also improved significantly, and voiding disturbance seems to have improved more than storage disturbance (P = 0.0280 vs. 0.0483).

CONCLUSION

TRT by administration of GL is considered to be effective in the improvement of not only ED and LOH symptoms, but also LUTS (especially voiding disturbance) of patients with LOH.

Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

• To review the evidence in support of the effectiveness of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

• Relevant studies were identified by performing a literature search using MEDLINE® and The Cochrane Library®. The criteria used during the search included randomized, placebo-controlled trials of treatment for LUTS secondary to BPH using the International Prostate Symptom Score as an outcome measure.

RESULTS

• Four trials that included a total of 1928 patients met the inclusion criteria. All four studies showed a statistically significant difference in the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life and erectile function in favour of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. • No study showed a statistically significant improvement of the maximum urinary flow. • Meta-analysis of the results was not possible because of heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

• Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors used in the clinical setting can significantly improve LUTS secondary to BPH, erectile function and quality of life. Maximum urinary flow improvement is not statistically significant. • Future research should focus on pathophysiological principles and cost analysis.

Sexual impact of treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) and the treatment of these conditions are commonly associated with sexual dysfunction. The effects on sexual function of common medical and surgical therapies used in the treatment of LUTS/BPH are reviewed. Also discussed is the emerging use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of LUTS/BPH.