EAA/EMQN best practice guidelines for molecular diagnosis of Y-chromosomal microdeletions: state-of-the-art 2013

Microdeletions and microduplications linked to severe congenital disorders in infertile men

Data on the clinical validity of DNA copy number variants (CNVs) in spermatogenic failure (SPGF) is limited. This study analyzed the genome-wide CNV profile in 215 men with idiopathic SPGF and 62 normozoospermic fertile men, recruited at the Andrology Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Estonia. A two-fold higher representation of > 1 Mb CNVs was observed in men with SPGF (13%, n = 28) compared to controls (6.5%, n = 4). Seven patients with SPGF were identified as carriers of microdeletions (1q21.1; 2.4 Mb) or microduplications (3p26.3, 1.1 Mb; 7p22.3-p22.2, 1.56 Mb; 10q11.22, 1.42 Mb, three cases; Xp22.33; 2.3 Mb) linked to severe congenital conditions. Large autosomal CNV carriers had oligozoospermia, reduced or low-normal bitesticular volume (22-28 ml). The 7p22.3-p22.2 microduplication carrier presented mild intellectual disability, neuropsychiatric problems, and short stature. The Xp22.33 duplication at the PAR1/non-PAR boundary, previously linked to uterine agenesis, was detected in a patient with non-obstructive azoospermia. A novel recurrent intragenic deletion in testis-specific LRRC69 was significantly overrepresented in patients with SPGF compared to the general population (3.3% vs. 0.85%; χ² test, OR = 3.9 [95% CI 1.8-8.4], P = 0.0001). Assessment of clinically valid CNVs in patients with SPGF will improve their management and counselling for general and reproductive health, including risk of miscarriage and congenital disorders in future offspring.

Bridging the Gap between AZF Microdeletions and Karyotype: Twelve Years' Experience of an Infertility Center

PURPOSE

Despite all past efforts, the current guidelines are not explicit enough regarding the indications for performing azoospermia factor (AZF) screening and karyotype, burdening clinicians with the decision to assess whether such tests are meaningful for the infertile male patient. These assessments can be costly and it is up to the healthcare practitioner to decide which are necessary and to weigh the benefits against economic/psychological harm. The aim of this study is to address such gaps and provide update on current management options for this group of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To address such gaps in male infertility management and to elucidate whether AZF screening is indicated in individuals who concomitantly harbor chromosomal abnormalities we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 10,388 consecutive patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and severe oligozoospermia.

RESULTS

Previously, it has been suggested that all NOA cases with chromosomal defects, except males with 46,XY/45,X karyotype, have no indication for AZF screening. Our findings revealed that cases carrying the following chromosomal abnormalities inv(Y)(p11.2q12); idic(Y)(q11.2); 46,XY,r(Y); idic(Y)(p11.2) and der(Y;Autosome) (76/169; 44.9%; 95% CI, 37.7-52.5) should also be referred for AZF deletion screening. Here, we also report the correlation between sperm count and AZF deletions as a secondary outcome. In accordance with previously reported data from North America and Europe, our data revealed that only 1% of cases with >1×10⁶ sperm/mL had Y chromosome microdeletions (YCMs).

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of assisted reproduction, finding cost-minimization strategies in infertility clinics without affecting the quality of diagnosis is becoming one of the top prioritized topics for future research. From a diagnostic viewpoint, the results reflect a need to reconsider the different karyotype presentations and the sperm count thresholds in male infertility guidelines as indicators for YCM screening during an infertility evaluation.

Genetic control of meiosis surveillance mechanisms in mammals

Meiosis is a specialized cell division that generates haploid gametes and is critical for successful sexual reproduction. During the extended meiotic prophase I, homologous chromosomes progressively pair, synapse and desynapse. These chromosomal dynamics are tightly integrated with meiotic recombination (MR), during which programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed and subsequently repaired. Consequently, parental chromosome arms reciprocally exchange, ultimately ensuring accurate homolog segregation and genetic diversity in the offspring. Surveillance mechanisms carefully monitor the MR and homologous chromosome synapsis during meiotic prophase I to avoid producing aberrant chromosomes and defective gametes. Errors in these critical processes would lead to aneuploidy and/or genetic instability. Studies of mutation in mouse models, coupled with advances in genomic technologies, lead us to more clearly understand how meiosis is controlled and how meiotic errors are linked to mammalian infertility. Here, we review the genetic regulations of these major meiotic events in mice and highlight our current understanding of their surveillance mechanisms. Furthermore, we summarize meiotic prophase genes, the mutations that activate the surveillance system leading to meiotic prophase arrest in mouse models, and their corresponding genetic variants identified in human infertile patients. Finally, we discuss their value for the diagnosis of causes of meiosis-based infertility in humans.

Cell therapy for the treatment of reproductive diseases and infertility: an overview from the mechanism to the clinic alongside diagnostic methods

Infertility is experienced by 8%-12% of adults in their reproductive period globally and has become a prevalent concern. Besides routine therapeutic methods, stem cells are rapidly being examined as viable alternative therapies in regenerative medicine and translational investigation. Remarkable progress has been made in understanding the biology and purpose of stem cells. The affected pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are further studied for their possible use in reproductive medicine, particularly for infertility induced by premature ovarian insufficiency and azoospermia. Accordingly, this study discusses current developments in the use of some kinds of MSCs such as adipose-derived stem cells, bone marrow stromal cells, umbilical cord MSCs, and menstrual blood MSCs. These methods have been used to manage ovarian and uterine disorders, and each technique presents a novel method for the therapy of infertility.

The predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval for men with Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion

PURPOSE

To identify key predictors for successful sperm retrieval in men with AZFc microdeletion.

METHODS

Totally, 71 infertile men with confirmed AZFc microdeletion were studied. For each patient, the endocrine profile including serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, total testosterone, prolactin, and estradiol was recorded, along with intratesticular testosterone levels (ITT), age, and testicular size. The factors were further analyzed to determine the key predictors for successful sperm retrieval.

RESULTS

Of the 71 men with AZFc microdeletion, 52 (73.2%) were classified as having non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), 7 (9.9%) as having cryptozoospermia, and 12 (15.8%) as having severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. Of the 52 men with azoospermia, 47 received microdissection testicular sperm retrieval, and sperm retrieval was successful in 35 of those cases (74.5%). A significantly lower serum FSH (p = 0.03) was found in those patients from whom sperm could be successfully retrieved. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve for FSH was determined to be 0.721. Using an FSH cutoff point of 12.95 mIU/mL, the model for predicting successful sperm retrieval was found to have 51.4% sensitivity, 83.3% specificity, 90.0% positive predictive value, and 37.0% negative predictive value. ITT levels were obtained from 7 NOA patients, the mean ITT and the mean ITT/serum testosterone ratio was 1932.8 ng/ml and 567.2 in 6 men with successful sperm retrieval, whereas, in a patient with fail sperm retrieval, the levels were 2370 ng/ml and 393.0.

CONCLUSION

Men exhibiting AZFc microdeletion with discernible spermatogenesis from whom sperm was successfully retrieved by mTESE generally presented with relatively lower FSH levels.

Genomic testing for copy number and single nucleotide variants in spermatogenic failure

PURPOSE

To identify clinically significant genomic copy number (CNV) and single nucleotide variants (SNV) in males with unexplained spermatogenic failure (SPGF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood DNA from 97/102 study participants diagnosed with oligozoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was analyzed for CNVs via array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and SNVs using whole-exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Of the 2544 CNVs identified in individuals with SPGF, > 90% were small, ranging from 0.6 to 75 kb. Thirty, clinically relevant genomic aberrations, were detected in 28 patients (~ 29%). These included likely diagnostic CNVs in 3/41 NOA patients (~ 7%): 1 hemizygous, intragenic TEX11 deletion, 1 hemizygous DDX53 full gene deletion, and 1 homozygous, intragenic STK11 deletion. High-level mosaicism for X chromosome disomy (~ 10% 46,XY and ~ 90% 47,XXY) was also identified in 3 of 41 NOA patients who previously tested normal with conventional karyotyping. The remaining 24 CNVs detected were heterozygous, autosomal recessive carrier variants. Follow-up WES analysis confirmed 8 of 27 (30%) CNVs (X chromosome disomy excluded). WES analysis additionally identified 13 significant SNVs and/or indels in 9 patients (~ 9%) including X-linked AR, KAL1, and NR0B1 variants.

CONCLUSION

Using a combined genome-wide aCGH/WES approach, we identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic SNVs and CNVs in 15 patients (15%) with unexplained SPGF. This value equals the detection rate of conventional testing for aneuploidies and is considerably higher than the prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletions. Our results underscore the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis in emerging diagnostic testing of complex conditions like male infertility.

The significance of karyotyping and azoospermia factor analysis in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia or oligozoospermia

OBJECTIVE

We present our study about the significance of karyotyping and azoospermia factor(AZF) analysis in patients with azoospermia or oligozoospermia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 141 Taiwanese patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and 45 Taiwanese patients with oligozoospermia at MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, from 2010 to 2021 to determine the significance of karyotyping and azoospermia factor analysis. The karyotyping was analyzed using the Giemsa banding method. The AZF microdeletions were determined using multiplex polymerase chain reaction using primers specifically flanking the AZF subregions.

RESULTS

We found that 7.80% of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia had AZF microdeletions and 19.86% of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia had chromosomal anomalies or polymorphic variations. Furthermore, 4.44% of patients with oligozoospermia had AZF microdeletions, and 4.44% of patients with oligozoospermia had chromosomal anomalies or polymorphic variations.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 25.53% of patients with nonobstructive azoospermia and 8.88% of patients with oligozoospermia had abnormal findings. The significance of karyotyping and azoospermia factor analysis is more critical in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia than patients with oligozoospermia. Both karyotyping and AZF analysis could prevent delayed treatment for male infertility through accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. The number of our patients with AZFc microdeletion was also higher than that of patients with AZFa or AZFb. The spermatogenic potential may gradually decline in patients with AZFc microdeletion. The earlier is the diagnosis, the earlier will be the retrieval of testicular spermatozoa.

Repetitive DNA Sequences in the Human Y Chromosome and Male Infertility

The male-specific Y chromosome, which is well known for its diverse and complex repetitive sequences, has different sizes, genome structures, contents and evolutionary trajectories from other chromosomes and is of great significance for testis development and function. The large number of repetitive sequences and palindrome structure of the Y chromosome play an important role in maintaining the stability of male sex determining genes, although they can also cause non-allelic homologous recombination within the chromosome. Deletion of certain Y chromosome sequences will lead to spermatogenesis disorders and male infertility. And Y chromosome genes are also involved in the occurrence of reproductive system cancers and can increase the susceptibility of other tumors. In addition, the Y chromosome has very special value in the personal identification and parentage testing of male-related cases in forensic medicine because of its unique paternal genetic characteristics. In view of the extremely high frequency and complexity of gene rearrangements and the limitations of sequencing technology, the analysis of Y chromosome sequences and the study of Y-gene function still have many unsolved problems. This article will introduce the structure and repetitive sequence of the Y chromosome, summarize the correlation between Y chromosome various sequence deletions and male infertility for understanding the repetitive sequence of Y chromosome more systematically, in order to provide research motivation for further explore of the molecules mechanism of Y-deletion and male infertility and theoretical foundations for the transformation of basic research into applications in clinical medicine and forensic medicine.

The male infertility evaluation still matters in the era of high efficacy assisted reproductive technology

Today's reproductive endocrinology and infertility providers have many tools at their disposal when it comes to achieving pregnancy. In the setting of highly efficacious assisted reproductive technology, it is natural to assume that male factor infertility can be overcome by acquiring sperm and then bypassing the male evaluation. In this review, we go through guideline statements and a stepwise male factor infertility evaluation to propose that a thorough male evaluation remains important to optimize pregnancy and live birth. The foundation of this parallel evaluation is referral to a reproductive urologist for the optimization of the male partner, for advanced diagnostics and interventions, and for the detection of other underlying male pathology. We also discuss what future developments might have an impact on the workup of the infertile male.

Novel copy number variations within SYCE1 caused meiotic arrest and non-obstructive azoospermia

Background

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is the most severe disease in male infertility, but the genetic causes for majority of NOA remain unknown.

Methods

Two Chinese NOA-affected patients were recruited to identify the genetic causal factor of infertility. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted in the two patients with NOA. Sanger sequencing and CNV array were used to ascertain the WES results. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunofluorescence (IF) were carried out to evaluate the stage of spermatogenesis arrested in the affected cases.

Results

Novel heterozygous deletion (LOH) within SYCE1 (seq[GRCh37] del(10)(10q26.3)chr10:g.135111754_135427143del) and heterozygous loss of function (LoF) variant in SYCE1 (NM_001143763: c.689_690 del:p.F230fs) were identified in one NOA-affected patient. While homozygous deletion within SYCE1 (seq[GRCh37] del(10)(10q26.3)chr10:g.135340247_135379115del) was detected in the other patient with meiotic arrest. H&E and IF staining demonstrated that the spermatogenesis was arrested at pachytene stage in the two patients with NOA, suggesting these two novel CNVs within SYCE1 could lead to meiotic defect and NOA.

Conclusions

We identified that two novel CNVs within SYCE1 are associated with meiotic arrest and male infertility. Thus, our study expands the knowledge of variants in SYCE1 and provides a new insight to understand the genetic etiologies of NOA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01288-8.

Genetic Architecture of Azoospermia-Time to Advance the Standard of Care

BACKGROUND

Crypto- and azoospermia (very few/no sperm in the semen) are main contributors to male factor infertility. Genetic causes for spermatogenic failure (SPGF) include Klinefelter syndrome and Y-chromosomal azoospermia factor microdeletions, and CFTR mutations for obstructive azoospermia (OA). However, the majority of cases remain unexplained because monogenic causes are not analysed.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the monogenic contribution to azoospermia by prospective exome sequencing and strict application of recent clinical guidelines.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Since January 2017, we studied crypto- and azoospermic men without chromosomal aberrations and Y-chromosomal microdeletions attending the Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Münster.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We performed exome sequencing in 647 men, analysed 60 genes having at least previous limited clinical validity, and strictly assessed variants according to clinical guidelines.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 55 patients (8.5%) with diagnostic genetic variants were identified. Of these patients, 20 (3.1%) carried mutations in CFTR or ADGRG2, and were diagnosed with OA. In 35 patients (5.4%) with SPGF, mutations in 20 different genes were identified. According to ClinGen criteria, 19 of the SPGF genes now reach at least moderate clinical validity. As limitations, only one transcript per gene was considered, and the list of genes is increasing rapidly so cannot be exhaustive.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of diagnostic genes in crypto-/azoospermia was almost doubled to 21 using exome-based analyses and clinical guidelines. Application of this procedure in routine diagnostics will significantly improve the diagnostic yield and clinical workup as the results indicate the success rate of testicular sperm extraction.

PATIENT SUMMARY

When no sperm are found in the semen, a man cannot conceive naturally. The causes are often unknown, but genetics play a major role. We searched for genetic variants in a large group of patients and found causal mutations for one in 12 men; these predict the chances for fatherhood.

Management of male factor infertility: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) : Endorsing Organization: Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR)

PURPOSE

Infertility affects 15-20% of couples and male factors are present in about half of the cases. For many aspects related to the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of male factor infertility, there is no general consensus, and the clinical approach is not uniform.

METHODS

In the present document by the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), endorsed by the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR), we propose evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of male factor infertility to improve patient and couple care.

RESULTS

Components of the initial evaluation should include at minimum medical history, physical examination, and semen analysis. Semen microbiological examination, endocrine assessment, and imaging are suggested in most men and recommended when specific risk factors for infertility exist or first-step analyses showed abnormalities. Full examination including genetic tests, testicular cytology/histology, or additional tests on sperm is clinically oriented and based on the results of previous investigations. For treatment purposes, the identification of the specific cause and the pathogenetic mechanism is advisable. At least, distinguishing pre-testicular, testicular, and post-testicular forms is essential. Treatment should be couple-oriented, including lifestyle modifications, etiologic therapies, empirical treatments, and ART on the basis of best evidence and with a gradual approach.

CONCLUSION

These Guidelines are based on two principal aspects: they are couple-oriented and place high value in assessing, preventing, and treating risk factors for infertility. These Guidelines also highlighted that male infertility and in particular testicular function might be a mirror of general health of a man.

Role of testis‑specific serine kinase 1B in undiagnosed male infertility

Male infertility is a global problem affecting a considerable part of the male population. Current guidelines and practices aimed at diagnosing the cause of this problem still have low diagnostic yield. As novel candidate genes for infertility emerge, their functional role needs to be investigated in patient populations. The present study aimed to investigate testis-specific serine kinase 1B (TSSK1B), which was discovered in a previously diagnosed patient. Sanger sequencing of the coding regions and exon borders of TSSK1B was performed in a cohort of 100 male Bulgarian patients with unresolved infertility causes. Missense mutations were discovered in 10% of patients and were associated with clinical data on sperm dysmorphology. Two previously unreported mutations were discovered, p.3D>N and p.52F>L. All mutations were scored via in silico predictors and protein modelling using AlphaFold2. The present findings indicated an association between TSSK1B mutations and asthenoteratozoospermia, with further missense mutations in patients with azoospermia and teratozoospermia. Mutations in TSSK1B may be a cause of undiagnosed cases of male infertility and should be considered when molecular diagnostics are warranted.

Prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletions among infertile Mongolian men

Y chromosome microdeletions are the second most common genetic cause of male infertility after Klinefelter syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine the patterns of Y chromosome microdeletions among infertile Mongolian men. A descriptive study was performed on 75 infertile men from February 2017 to December 2018. Y chromosome microdeletions were identified by polymerase chain reaction. Semen parameters, hormonal levels, and testis biopsy samples were examined. Among 75 infertile men, two cases of Y chromosome microdeletions were identified. The first case had an AZFa complete deletion and the other had an AZFc partial deletion. This study found that the proportion of Y chromosome microdeletions among infertile Mongolian men was 2.66%. The findings can be applied to in vitro fertilization and assisted reproductive technology, and our results will help clinicians improve treatment management for infertile Mongolian couples.

Overview Of Current NGS Testing For Male Factor Infertility

Aim — Infertility is a global health problem. The next-generation sequencing and panel testing are offering new opportunities to further diagnose the reason for male infertility. The aim of this paper is to provide a better insight into the currently available panels for male infertility due to impaired spermatogenesis. Methods — We conducted research in the Genetic testing registry by using the keywords „infertility“, „male infertility“. We also gathered information about the number of tested genes, coverage of the panels, turnaround time, and any additional tests, which could be ordered. Results — As a result there were eleven laboratories, offering panel testing for male infertility, which tested for 230 different genes, but 65 genes (28.26%) from the different panels had an uncertain role for the tested condition. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator was the only gene, suggested by all laboratories. Conclusions — Next-generation sequencing could be extremely helpful in the diagnostic process of male infertility. However, clinicians should be aware that some of the included genes have an uncertain role for male infertility.

Human chorionic gonadotropin therapy in hypogonadic severe-oligozoospermic men and its effect on semen parameters

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate whether human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) therapy is beneficial for improving semen parameters and clinical hypogonadism symptoms in hypogonadic oligozoospermic or severe oligozoospermic men with low or borderline testosterone levels.

Methods

A weekly dose of 250 μg (equivalent to approximately 6,500 IU) of hCG was administered subcutaneously for 3–6 months to 56 hypogonadic oligozoospermic or severe oligozoospermic men. Semen, biochemical, and genetic analyses were performed before the start of treatment followed by analyzing semen parameters every 3 months after the start of therapy. We grouped participants into responders and non-responders depending on positive changes in semen parameters.

Results

Out of 56 men, 47 (83.93%) responded, while 9 (16.07%) did not. Upon statistical analysis, it was found that age did not affect the overall outcomes (p=0.292); however, men with higher body mass index (BMI; 28.09±3.48 kg/m²) showed better outcomes than those with low BMI (25.33±3.06 kg/m²) (p=0.042). The duration of therapy (in months) was higher in non-responders than in responders (p=0.020). We found significant improvements in sperm concentration (p=0.006) and count (p=0.005) after 3 months of therapy. Sperm motility and progressive motility were also found to be higher in responders, but did not show statistically significant changes.

Conclusion

We conclude that hCG therapy can be beneficial in men with hypogonadic oligozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia.

Rapidly Progressing to ESRD in an Individual with Coexisting ADPKD and Masked Klinefelter and Gitelman Syndromes

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common monogenetic hereditary renal disease, promoting end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is a consequence of an extra copy of the X chromosome in males. Main symptoms in KS include hypogonadism, tall stature, azoospermia, and a risk of cardiovascular diseases, among others. Gitelman syndrome (GS) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by SLC12A3 variants, and is associated with hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hypocalciuria, normal or low blood pressure, and salt loss. The three disorders have distinct and well-delineated clinical, biochemical, and genetic findings. We here report a male patient with ADPKD who developed early chronic renal failure leading to ESRD, presenting with an intracranial aneurysm and infertility. NGS identified two de novo PKD1 variants, one known (likely pathogenic), and a previously unreported variant of uncertain significance, together with two SLC12A3 pathogenic variants. In addition, cytogenetic analysis showed a 47, XXY karyotype. We investigated the putative impact of this rare association by analyzing possible clinical, biochemical, and/or genetic interactions and by comparing the evolution of renal size and function in the proband with three age-matched ADPKD (by variants in PKD1) cohorts. We hypothesize that the coexistence of these three genetic disorders may act as modifiers with possible synergistic actions that could lead, in our patient, to a rapid ADPKD progression.

Detection of partial and/or complete Y chromosome microdeletions of azoospermia factor a (AZFa) sub-region in infertile Iraqi patients with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the incidence of azoospermia factor a (AZFa) microdeletions in the Y chromosome and their association with male infertility in a population with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia from Iraq.

METHODS

A total of 75 infertile Iraqi males and 25 healthy controls were included in this study. The semen analysis was performed to determine the azoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, or normal cases. The AZFa microdeletions were investigated using the real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR). Then, AZFa sub-region deletions were investigated by a conventional PCR.

RESULTS

In total, 40 men with azoospermia and 35 men with severe oligozoospermia were selected. Out of 75 infertile males, 46 (61.3%) individuals had AZFa microdeletions, of whom 32 (69.6%) had partial deletion, while 14 (30.4%) males had complete deletion using real-time PCR. The frequency of microdeletions was significantly different between the infertile and control group (p-value < 0.00001). The proportion of AZFa microdeletions appeared higher in azoospermia men (72.5%, n = 29/40) than severe oligozoospermia men (48.6%, n = 17/35), but based on the conventional PCR results, only one azoospermia patient (2.2%) was shown to have complete AZFa deletion, while the other 45 patients (97.8%) had partial AZFa deletions.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the partial AZFa microdeletions were more numerous than complete AZFa deletion. According to our results, the AZFa microdeletions might be associated with male infertility and spermatogenic failure. It is recommended to investigate the AZFa sub-region microdeletions in patients that shown AZFa microdeletions in primary screening.

Application of real-time shear wave elastography in the assessment of male infertility

BACKGROUND

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is recognized as a suitable imaging modality for identifying and characterizing testicular diseases. Recent exploration of SWE has focused on its feasibility in evaluating histopathological changes in the testicular parenchyma, with researchers increasingly focusing on the relationship between testicular stiffness and male fertility. In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of SWE for distinguishing the relationship between spermatogenic defects and testicular stiffness in males of reproductive age.

METHODS

This was a single center, cross-sectional study conducted from July 2017 to December 2019. A total of 1,116 consecutive patients who were voluntarily participating in in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-assisted conception at our hospital were recruited to the study. The cohort included 497 normozoospermia patients (Group I), 335 with normozoospermia and decreased motility and agglutination (Group II), 138 with oligozoospermia (Group III), 105 with non-obstructive azoospermia (Group-NOA), and 41 with obstructive azoospermia (Group-OA). We conducted SWE of each participant's testes and the testicular elastic modulus was calculated. The differences of testicular elastic modulus were compared among groups. Linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between sperm concentration and either testicular volume or testicular elastic modulus. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the maximum elastic modulus (Emax), mean elastic modulus (Emean), and maximum minus the minimum elastic modulus {E[max-min]}.

RESULTS

The Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] increased gradually in groups I, II, III, and Group-NOA, with statistical differences between groups (P<0.01). Testicular volume was shown to be positively correlated with sperm concentration (r=0.476; P<0.01), while the Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] were negatively correlated with sperm concentration (r=-0.511, -0.357, and -0.524, respectively; P<0.01). The ROC curves were established based on the Emax, Emean, and E[max-min] and were used to distinguish Group-OA from Group-NOA. The areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were 0.910, 0.863, and 0.900, respectively. We also used ROC curves to distinguish the severe oligozoospermia subgroup and Group-NOA from other groups, for which the AUCs were 0.877, 0.791, and 0.878, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SWE is an effective supplement to routine ultrasound examination and can be used to diagnose and differentiate spermatogenetic dysfunction.

Translational aspects of novel findings in genetics of male infertility-status quo 2021

INTRODUCTION

Male factor infertility concerns 7-10% of men and among these 40-60% remain unexplained.

SOURCES OF DATA

This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ~10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40-60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No 'recurrently' mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause.

GROWING POINTS

Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Di-/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the 'hidden' genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.

Copy number variants within AZF region of Y chromosome and their association with idiopathic male infertility in Serbian population

Results of numerous studies gave contradictory conclusions when analysing associations between copy number variants (CNVs) within the azoospermia factor (AZF) locus of the Y chromosome and idiopathic male infertility. The aim of this study was to identify the presence and possible association of CNVs in the AZF region of Y chromosome with idiopathic male infertility in the Serbian population. Using the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification technique, we were able to detect CNVs in 24 of 105 (22.86%) infertile men and in 11 of 112 (9.82%) fertile controls. The results of Fisher's exact test showed a statistically significant difference between cases and controls after merging g(reen)-r(ed)/g(reen)-r(ed) and b(lue)2/b(lue)3 partial deletions identified in the AZFc region (p = 0.024). At the same time, we observed a trend towards statistical significance for a deletion among gr/gr amplicons (p = 0.053). In addition to these, we identified a novel complex CNV involving inversion of r2/r3 amplicons, followed by b2/b3 duplication and b3/b4 deletion, respectively. Additional analyses on a larger study group would be necessary to draw meaningful conclusions about associations among CNVs that presented with higher frequency in the infertile men than the fertile controls.

HCG therapy in azoospermic men with lower or borderline testosterone levels and the prognostic value of Y-deletion analysis in its outcome

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of hCG therapy in hypogonadotropic hypogonadic (HH) azoospermic males along with dissecting the prognostic value of Y-deletion analysis in these patients. Fifty-eight azoospermic infertile males with diminished testosterone levels (≤400 ng/dl) and hypogonadism symptoms were subjected to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) therapy, and Y-deletion analysis was undertaken. Post-treatment, 43% (25/58) patients showed improvement in sperm count with 8.6% (5/58) turning severe oligozoospermic, 24.14% (14/58) patients turning oligozoospermic and 10.54% (6/58) turning normozoospermic. Among responders, the mean sperm concentration was 8.47 ± 13.16 million/ml, sperm count was 17.05 ± 26.17 million, sperm motility was 52.59% ± 25.09% and sperm progressive motility was 26.91% ± 20.51%. Seventeen out of 25 (68%) responders and 11/33 (33%) nonresponders showed an improvement in libido post-therapy. A Y-deletion was observed in 8% (2/25) responders and in 39.39% (13 out of 33) nonresponders. The Y-deletions were more often found in nonresponders in comparison with the responders (Fisher's exact probability test, p = .007, one tailed). We conclude that hCG therapy in hypogonadotropic azoospermic males is effective in improving andrological parameters and sperm production and that Y-chromosome deletion analysis has prognostic significance in predicting the success of hCG therapy.

Genetic Factors of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Consequences on Patients' and Offspring Health

Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA) affects about 1% of men in the general population and is characterized by clinical heterogeneity implying the involvement of several different acquired and genetic factors. NOA men are at higher risk to be carriers of known genetic anomalies such as karyotype abnormalities and Y-chromosome microdeletions in respect to oligo-normozoospermic men. In recent years, a growing number of novel monogenic causes have been identified through Whole Exome Sequencing (WES). Genetic testing is useful for diagnostic and pre-TESE prognostic purposes as well as for its potential relevance for general health. Several epidemiological observations show a link between azoospermia and higher morbidity and mortality rate, suggesting a common etiology for NOA and some chronic diseases, including cancer. Since on average 50% of NOA patients has a positive TESE outcome, the identification of genetic factors in NOA patients has relevance also to the offspring's health. Although still debated, the observed increased risk of certain neurodevelopmental disorders, as well as impaired cardiometabolic and reproductive health profile in children conceived with ICSI from NOA fathers may indicate the involvement of transmissible genetic factors. This review provides an update on the reproductive and general health consequences of known genetic factors causing NOA, including offspring's health.

Prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletion in azoospermia factor subregions among infertile men from West Bengal, India

Background

Etiology of male infertility is intriguing and Y chromosome microdeletion within azoospermia factor (AZF) sub‐regions is considered major cause. We conducted a screening for Y chromosome microdeletion in an infertile male cohort from West Bengal, India to characterize Y chromosome microdeletion among infertile men.

Methods

We recruited case subjects that were categorized on the basis of sperm count as azoospermia (N = 63), severe oligozoospermia (N = 38), and oligozoospermia (N = 17) and compared them with age, demography, and ethnicity matched healthy proven fertile control males (N = 84). Sequence Tagged Site makers and polymerase chain reaction based profiling of Y chromosome was done for AZF region and SRY for cases and controls.

Results

We scored 16.1% of cases (19 out of 118) that bear one or more microdeletions in the studied loci and none among the controls. The aberrations were more frequent among azoospermic males (17 of 19) than in severe oligozoospermic subjects (2 of 19).

Conclusion

Our study provides the results of screening of the largest Bengali infertile men sample genotyped with the maximum number of STS markers spanning the entire length of Y chromosome long arm. Y chromosome microdeletion is a significant genetic etiology of infertility among Bengali men.

Will whole-genome sequencing become the first-line genetic analysis for male infertility in the near future?

Whereas the initially strategy for the genetic analysis of male infertility was based on a candidate gene approach, the development of next-generation sequencing technologies (such as whole-exome sequencing (WES)) provides an opportunity to analyze many genes in a single procedure. In order to recommend WES or whole-genome sequencing (WGS) after genetic counselling, an objective evaluation of the current genetic screening strategy for male infertility is required, even if, at present, we have to take into consideration the complexity of such a procedure, not discussed in this commentary.

Targeted next-generation sequencing panel screening of 668 Chinese patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

We aimed (1) to determine the molecular diagnosis rate and the recurrent causative genes of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel screening and (2) to discuss whether these genes help in the prognosis for microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE).

METHODS

We used NGS panels to screen 668 Chinese men with NOA. Micro-TESE outcomes for six patients with pathogenic mutations were followed up. Functional assays were performed for two NR5A1 variants identified: p.I224V and p.R281C.

RESULTS

Targeted NGS panel sequencing could explain 4/189 (2.1% by panel 1) or 10/479 (2.1% by panel 2) of the patients with NOA after exclusion of karyotype abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions. Almost all mutations detected were newly described except for NR5A1 p.R281C and TEX11 p.M156V. Two missense NR5A1 mutations-p.R281C and p.I244V-were proved to be deleterious by in vitro functional assays. Mutations in TEX11, TEX14, and NR5A1 genes are recurrent causes of NOA, but each gene explains only a very small percentage (less than 4/668; 0.6%). Only the patient with NR5A1 mutations produced viable spermatozoa through micro-TESE, but other patients with TEX11 and TEX14 had poor micro-TESE prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted NGS panel is a feasible diagnostic method for patients with NOA. Because each gene implicated explains only a small proportion of such cases, more genes should be included to further increase the diagnostic rate. Considering previous reports, we suggest that only a few genes that are directly linked to meiosis can indicate poor micro-TESE prognosis, such as TEX11, TEX14, and SYCE1.

Endocrine, sexual and reproductive functions in patients with Klinefelter syndrome compared to non-obstructive azoospermic patients

AIMS

We aimed to investigate fertilisation rates, quality of embryo, pregnancy and live birth rates, endocrine, sexual function, psychological status and quality of life of cases diagnosed with Klinefelter syndrome (KS).

METHODS

Clinical findings, hormone values and semen analyses in patients with nonmosaic KS (Group 1, n = 121) and those with non-genetic nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) (Group 2, n = 178) were retrospectively analysed. Sperm retrieval outcomes with microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE), fertilisation rates and embryo quality, pregnancy, abortion and live birth rates were compared. Sexual functions were assessed using IIEF-15, quality of life was evaluated and psychological status was assessed.

RESULTS

There was no difference in terms of age between groups. Sperm retrieval rates was 38% and 55.6% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .012). Sperm retrieval rates were higher in Group 1 before 31.5 years than in Group 2 (AUC = 0.620 and 0.578). Compared to Group 2, the fertilisation rate was low in Group 1, whereas embryo quality was similar. Live birth rates were 12.5% and 23% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .392). The education level, libido, erectile functions and general health satisfaction were lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < .005). Depression and anxiety levels were higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Higher sperm retrieval rate has been achieved in Group 1 younger than 31.5 years. Similar embryo quality is provided between groups. Sexual dysfunction and psychiatric problems were higher in Group 1, with lower satisfaction and general health than Group 2. Patients with KS should be monitored not only with their reproductive functions but also with their general health status.

Stereological properties of seminiferous tubules in infertile men with chromosomal and genetic abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Male infertility is caused by genetic anomalies in 15%-30% of cases. This study aimed to determine stereological properties of seminiferous tubules in infertile men with genetic anomalies, including Klinefelter syndrome (KS), Y chromosome microdeletions (MYC) and CFTR gene mutations (CFTR), and to compare them to seminiferous tubules of men with obstructive azoospermia of non-genetic origin (control group).

METHODS

The study was conducted on 28 human testis biopsy specimens obtained from 14 patients with MYC, 18 samples from 9 patients with KS, and 6 samples from 3 patients with CFTR. Whenever possible, a bilateral biopsy was included in the study. The control group had 33 samples from 18 patients (3 of them with a solitary testis). Qualitative and quantitative (stereological) analysis of seminiferous tubules (including the status of spermatogenesis, volume, surface area, length and number of tubules) were performed in all groups.

RESULTS

Qualitative histological analysis revealed significant impairment of spermatogenesis in KS and MYC, whereas testicular parenchyma was fully maintained in CFTR and control groups. Spermatogenesis was most seriously impaired in KS. All stereological parameters were significantly lower in KS and MYC, compared to the CFTR and control groups. The total volume, surface and length of seminiferous tubules were significantly lower in KS compared with MYC.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereological analysis is valuable in evaluating male infertility, whereas qualitative histological analysis can be helpful in assessing sperm presence in testicular tissue of patients with KS or MYK undergoing TESE.

Differential Diagnosis of Azoospermia in Men with Infertility

The differential diagnosis between obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia is the first step in the clinical management of azoospermic patients with infertility. It includes a detailed medical history and physical examination, semen analysis, hormonal assessment, genetic tests, and imaging studies. A testicular biopsy is reserved for the cases of doubt, mainly in patients whose history, physical examination, and endocrine analysis are inconclusive. The latter should be combined with sperm extraction for possible sperm cryopreservation. We present a detailed analysis on how to make the azoospermia differential diagnosis and discuss three clinical cases where the differential diagnosis was challenging. A coordinated effort involving reproductive urologists/andrologists, geneticists, pathologists, and embryologists will offer the best diagnostic path for men with azoospermia.

Investigation of genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with AZF microdeletion in a single-reference centre

In this study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between AZF deletion type and clinical information of azoospermic patients with AZF microdeletion in the Turkish population. Azoospermic patients with normal karyotype and AZF microdeletion were analysed retrospectively by collecting clinical data including hormone profile, demographic characteristics and micro-TESE results. As a result of the AZF microdeletion tests of 42 cases with 46 XY karyotype, AZFa deletion was detected in 3 cases, AZFb deletion in 2 cases, AZFc deletion in 31 cases, AZFb + AZFc deletion in 4 cases and AZFa + AZFb + AZFc deletion in 2 cases respectively. Spermatozoon was obtained in 16 cases with AZFc microdeletion with micro-TESE. Pregnancy was achieved in 2 cases. There was no statistically significant difference between the type of deletion and age, height, weight, body mass index, hormone profile and testicular volume. When AZF is evaluated according to the type of microdeletion, it will be appropriate to plan the medical and surgical options more carefully in a multidisciplinary manner in cases with deletions including AZFa, AZFb or their combinations. Also, genotype-phenotype correlation was found to be consistent with the literature; particularly patients having AZFc deletions were found to have a chance for pregnancy.

Y chromosome microdeletion screening using a new molecular diagnostic method in 1030 Japanese males with infertility

The azoospermia factor (AZF) region is important for spermatogenesis, and deletions within these regions are a common cause of oligozoospermia and azoospermia. Although several studies have reported this cause, the present research, to the best of our knowledge, is the first large-scale study assessing this factor in Japan. In this study, 1030 male patients with infertility who were examined for Y chromosome microdeletion using the polymerase chain reaction-reverse sequence-specific oligonucleotide (PCR-rSSO) method, a newly developed method for Y chromosome microdeletion screening, were included. The study enrolled 250 patients with severe oligospermia and 717 patients with azoospermia. Among the 1030 patients, 4, 4, 10, and 52 had AZFa, AZFb, AZFb+c, and AZFc deletions, respectively. The sperm recovery rate (SRR) of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with AZFc deletions was significantly higher than that in those without AZF deletions (60.0% vs 28.7%, P = 0.04). In patients with gr/gr deletion, SRR was 18.7%, which was lower than that in those without gr/gr deletion, but was not statistically significant. In conclusion, our study showed that the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletion in male patients in Japan was similar to that reported in patients from other countries, and SRR was higher in patients with AZFc deletion.

Unraveling the Balance between Genes, Microbes, Lifestyle and the Environment to Improve Healthy Reproduction

Humans’ health is the result of a complex and balanced interplay between genetic factors, environmental stimuli, lifestyle habits, and the microbiota composition. The knowledge about their single contributions, as well as the complex network linking each to the others, is pivotal to understand the mechanisms underlying the onset of many diseases and can provide key information for their prevention, diagnosis and therapy. This applies also to reproduction. Reproduction, involving almost 10% of our genetic code, is one of the most critical human’s functions and is a key element to assess the well-being of a population. The last decades revealed a progressive decline of reproductive outcomes worldwide. As a consequence, there is a growing interest in unveiling the role of the different factors involved in human reproduction and great efforts have been carried out to improve its outcomes. As for many other diseases, it is now clear that the interplay between the underlying genetics, our commensal microbiome, the lifestyle habits and the environment we live in can either exacerbate the outcome or mitigate the adverse effects. Here, we aim to analyze how each of these factors contribute to reproduction highlighting their individual contribution and providing supporting evidence of how to modify their impact and overall contribution to a healthy reproductive status.

Genetic counseling prior to assisted reproductive technology

BACKGROUND

Reproductive medicine deals with fertility and is closely related to heredity. In reproductive medicine, it is necessary to provide genetic information for the patients prior to assisted reproductive technology (ART). Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine (JSRM) requires doctors involved in reproductive medicine to have standard knowledge of reproductive genetics and knowledge of reproductive medicine, which is covered in their publication, "required knowledge of reproductive medicine."

METHODS

With the aim of providing straightforward explanations to patients in the clinical situation at pre-ART counseling, we provide the following five topics, such as (a) risk of birth defects in children born with ART, (b) chromosomal abnormalities, (c) Y chromosome microdeletions (YCMs), (d) possible chromosomal abnormal pregnancy in oligospermatozoa requiring ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), and (e) epigenetic alterations.

MAIN FINDINGS

The frequency of chromosome abnormalities in infertile patients is 0.595%-0.64%. YCMs are observed in 2%-10% of severe oligospermic men. High incidence of spermatozoa with chromosomal abnormalities has been reported in advanced oligospermia and asthenozoospermia that require ICSI. Some epigenetic alterations were reported in the children born with ART.

CONCLUSION

Certain genetic knowledge is important for professionals involved in reproductive medicine, even if they are not genetic experts.

A common 1.6 mb Y-chromosomal inversion predisposes to subsequent deletions and severe spermatogenic failure in humans

Male infertility is a prevalent condition, affecting 5–10% of men. So far, few genetic factors have been described as contributors to spermatogenic failure. Here, we report the first re-sequencing study of the Y-chromosomal Azoospermia Factor c (AZFc) region, combined with gene dosage analysis of the multicopy DAZ, BPY2, and CDYgenes and Y-haplogroup determination. In analysing 2324 Estonian men, we uncovered a novel structural variant as a high-penetrance risk factor for male infertility. The Y lineage R1a1-M458, reported at >20% frequency in several European populations, carries a fixed ~1.6 Mb r2/r3 inversion, destabilizing the AZFc region and predisposing to large recurrent microdeletions. Such complex rearrangements were significantly enriched among severe oligozoospermia cases. The carrier vs non-carrier risk for spermatogenic failure was increased 8.6-fold (p=6.0×10⁻⁴). This finding contributes to improved molecular diagnostics and clinical management of infertility. Carrier identification at young age will facilitate timely counselling and reproductive decision-making.

Human AZFb deletions cause distinct testicular pathologies depending on their extensions in Yq11 and the Y haplogroup: new cases and review of literature

Genomic AZFb deletions in Yq11 coined “classical” (i.e. length of Y DNA deletion: 6.23 Mb) are associated with meiotic arrest (MA) of patient spermatogenesis, i.e., absence of any postmeiotic germ cells. These AZFb deletions are caused by non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) events between identical sequence blocks located in the proximal arm of the P5 palindrome and within P1.2, a 92 kb long sequence block located in the P1 palindrome structure of AZFc in Yq11. This large genomic Y region includes deletion of 6 protein encoding Y genes, EIFA1Y, HSFY, PRY, RBMY1, RPS4Y, SMCY. Additionally, one copy of CDY2 and XKRY located in the proximal P5 palindrome and one copy of BPY1, two copies of DAZ located in the P2 palindrome, and one copy of CDY1 located proximal to P1.2 are included within this AZFb microdeletion. It overlaps thus distally along 2.3 Mb with the proximal part of the genomic AZFc deletion. However, AZFb deletions have been also reported with distinct break sites in the proximal and/or distal AZFb breakpoint intervals on the Y chromosome of infertile men. These so called “non-classical” AZFb deletions are associated with variable testicular pathologies, including meiotic arrest, cryptozoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, or oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT syndrome), respectively. This raised the question whether there are any specific length(s) of the AZFb deletion interval along Yq11 required to cause meiotic arrest of the patient’s spermatogenesis, respectively, whether there is any single AZFb Y gene deletion also able to cause this “classical” AZFb testicular pathology? Review of the literature and more cases with “classical” and “non-classical” AZFb deletions analysed in our lab since the last 20 years suggests that the composition of the genomic Y sequence in AZFb is variable in men with distinct Y haplogroups especially in the distal AZFb region overlapping with the proximal AZFc deletion interval and that its extension can be “polymorphic” in the P3 palindrome. That means this AZFb subinterval can be rearranged or deleted also on the Y chromosome of fertile men. Any AZFb deletion observed in infertile men with azoospermia should therefore be confirmed as “de novo” mutation event, i.e., not present on the Y chromosome of the patient’s father or fertile brother before it is considered as causative agent for man’s infertility. Moreover, its molecular length in Yq11 should be comparable to that of the “classical” AZFb deletion, before meiotic arrest is prognosed as the patient’s testicular pathology.

Genetics of Azoospermia

Azoospermia affects 1% of men, and it can be due to: (i) hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, (ii) primary quantitative spermatogenic disturbances, (iii) urogenital duct obstruction. Known genetic factors contribute to all these categories, and genetic testing is part of the routine diagnostic workup of azoospermic men. The diagnostic yield of genetic tests in azoospermia is different in the different etiological categories, with the highest in Congenital Bilateral Absence of Vas Deferens (90%) and the lowest in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia (NOA) due to primary testicular failure (~30%). Whole-Exome Sequencing allowed the discovery of an increasing number of monogenic defects of NOA with a current list of 38 candidate genes. These genes are of potential clinical relevance for future gene panel-based screening. We classified these genes according to the associated-testicular histology underlying the NOA phenotype. The validation and the discovery of novel NOA genes will radically improve patient management. Interestingly, approximately 37% of candidate genes are shared in human male and female gonadal failure, implying that genetic counselling should be extended also to female family members of NOA patients.

A Novel Balanced Chromosomal Translocation in an Azoospermic Male: A Case Report

Background:

Balanced translocation and azoospermia as two main reasons for recurrent pregnancy loss are known to be the leading causes of infertility across the world. Balanced translocations in azoospermic males are very rare and extensive studies need to be performed to elucidate the translocation status of the affected individuals.

Case Presentaion:

The cytogenetic characterization of a 28 year old male and his female partner is reported in this study. The male partner was diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and the couple was unable to conceive. Cytogenetic analysis by karyotyping through Giemsa-trypsin-giemsa banding technique (GTG) showed a novel balanced translocation, 46,XY,t(19;22)(19q13.4;22q11.2), 13ps+ in the male and the female karyotype was found to be 46,XX. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) analysis on paternal chromosomal preparations confirmed both the region and origin of balanced translocation. The status of Y chromosome microdeletion (YMD) was analyzed and no notable microdeletion was observed. Furthermore, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis was performed for breakpoint regions to explore the possible functional genetic associations.

Conclusion:

The azoospermic condition of the male patient along with novel balanced chromosomal translocation was responsible for infertility irrespective of its YMD status. Therefore, cytogenetic screening of azoospermic patients should be performed in addition to routine semen analysis to rule out or to confirm presence of any numerical or structural anomaly in the patient.

Y-microdeletions: a review of the genetic basis for this common cause of male infertility

The human Y-chromosome contains genetic material responsible for normal testis development and spermatogenesis. The long arm (Yq) of the Y-chromosome has been found to be susceptible to self-recombination during spermatogenesis predisposing this area to deletions. The incidence of these deletions is estimated to be 1/4,000 in the general population but has been found to be much higher in infertile men. Currently, Y-microdeletions are the second most commonly identified genetic cause of male infertility after Klinefelter syndrome. This has led to testing for these deletions becoming standard practice in men with azoospermia and severe oligospermia. There are three commonly identified Y-microdeletions in infertile males, termed azoospermia factor (AZF) microdeletions AZFa, AZFb and AZFc. With increased understanding and investigation of this genetic basis for infertility a more comprehensive understanding of these deletions has evolved, with several other deletion subtypes being identified. Understanding the genetic basis and pathology behind these Y-microdeletions is essential for any clinician involved in reproductive medicine. In this review we discuss the genetic basis of Y-microdeletions, the various subtypes of deletions, and current technologies available for testing. Our understanding of this issue is evolving in many areas, and in this review we highlight future testing opportunities that may allow us to stratify men with Y-microdeletion associated infertility more accurately

Histology and sperm retrieval among men with Y chromosome microdeletions

In this review of Y chromosome microdeletions, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletion subtypes, histological features and microTESE sperm retrieval rates are summarized after a systematic literature review. PubMed was searched and papers were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Approximately half of infertile couples have a male factor contributing to their infertility. One of the most common genetic etiologies are Y chromosome microdeletions. Men with Y chromosome microdeletions may have rare sperm available in the ejaculate or undergo surgical sperm retrieval and subsequent intracytoplasmic sperm injection to produce offspring. Azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia are the most common semen analysis findings found in men with Y chromosome microdeletions, associated with impaired spermatogenesis. Men with complete deletions of azoospermia factor a, b, or a combination of any loci have severely impaired spermatogenesis and are nearly always azoospermic with no sperm retrievable from the testis. Deletions of the azoospermia factor c or d often have sperm production and the highest likelihood of a successful sperm retrieval. In men with AZFc deletions, histologically, 46% of men demonstrate Sertoli cell only syndrome on biopsy, whereas 38.2% have maturation arrest and 15.7% have hypospermatogenesis. The microTESE sperm retrieval rates in AZFc-deleted men range from 13-100% based on the 32 studies analyzed, with a mean sperm retrieval rate of 47%.

Genetic testing for men with infertility: techniques and indications

Genetic testing is an integral component in the workup of male infertility as genetic conditions may be responsible for up to 15% of all cases. Currently, three genetic tests are commonly performed and recommended by major urologic associations: karyotype analysis (KA), Y-chromosome microdeletion testing, and CFTR mutation testing. Despite widespread adoption of these tests, an etiology for infertility remains elusive in up to 80% of cases. Recent work has identified intriguing new targets for genetic testing which may soon see clinical relevance. This review will discuss the indications and techniques for currently offered genetic tests and briefly explore ongoing research directions within this field.

Y chromosome copy number variation and its effects on fertility and other health factors: a review

The Y chromosome is essential for testis development and spermatogenesis. It is a chromosome with the lowest gene density owing to its medium size but paucity of coding genes. The Y chromosome is unique in that the majority of its structure is highly repetitive sequences, with the majority of these limited genes occurring in 9 amplionic sequences throughout the chromosome. The repetitive nature has its benefits as it can be protective against gene loss over many generations, but it can also predispose the Y chromosome to having wide variations of the number of gene copies present in these repeated sequences. This is known as copy number variation. Copy number variation is not unique to the Y chromosome but copy number variation is a well-known cause of male infertility and having effects on spermatogenesis. This is most commonly seen as deletions of the AZF sequences on the Y chromosome. However, there are other implications for copy number variation beyond just the AZF deletions that can affect spermatogenesis and potentially have other health implications. Copy number variations of TSPY1, DAZ, CDY1, RBMY1, the DYZ1 array, along with minor deletions of gr/gr, b1/b3, and b2/b3 have all be implicated in affecting spermatogenesis. UTY copy number variations have been implicated in risk for cardiovascular disease, and other deletions within gr/gr and the AZF sequences have been implicated in cancer and neuropsychiatric diseases. This review sets out to describe the Y chromosome and unique susceptibility to copy number variation and then to examine how this growing body of research impacts spermatogenesis and other health factors.

Y-Chromosome Microdeletions: A Review of Prevalence, Screening, and Clinical Considerations

Deletions within the male-specific region of the Y-chromosome, known as Y-Chromosome Microdeletions (YCMs), are present in as many as 5% and 10% of severe oligospermic and azoospermic men, respectively. These microdeletions are distinguished by which segment of the Y chromosome is absent, identified as AZFa (the most proximal segment), AZFb (middle), and AZFc (distal). The reported prevalence of YCMs within the world’s populations of infertile men displays vast heterogeneity, ranging from less than 2% to over 24% based on region and ethnicity. AZFc is the most commonly identified YCM, and its phenotypic presentation provides for the highest chance for fertility through artificial reproductive techniques. Conversely, deletions identified in the subregions of AZFa, AZFb, or any combination of regions containing these segments, are associated with low probabilities of achieving pregnancy. A putative mechanism explaining this discrepancy lies within the expression of autosomal, DAZ-like genes which could serve to “rescue” wild type AZFc gene expression and hence spermatogenesis. Nevertheless, recent reports challenge this dogma and stress the importance of further analysis when an AZFb deletion is detected. The screening thresholds to determine which oligospermic and azoospermic men are tested for potential YCMs has been recently contested. More recent literature supports lowering the threshold from 5 million sperm/mL of ejaculate to 1 million/mL as the frequency of YCMs in men with sperm concentrations between 1 and 5 million sperm/mL is very low (~0.8%). As such, subsequent guidelines should recommend a lower screening threshold. While YCMs are extremely common globally, the understanding of their clinical significance in the field remains scattered and without consensus. Furthermore, very little is currently known about partial deletions within the AZFc region, such as b1/b3, b2/b3, and gr/gr. Hence, this review aimed to summarize and discuss modern trends in the epidemiology, screening guidelines, and clinical considerations pertaining to YCMs.

Male infertility

It is estimated that infertility affects 8-12% of couples globally, with a male factor being a primary or contributing cause in approximately 50% of couples. Causes of male subfertility vary highly, but can be related to congenital, acquired, or idiopathic factors that impair spermatogenesis. Many health conditions can affect male fertility, which underscores the need for a thorough evaluation of patients to identify treatable or reversible lifestyle factors or medical conditions. Although semen analysis remains the cornerstone for evaluating male infertility, advanced diagnostic tests to investigate sperm quality and function have been developed to improve diagnosis and management. The use of assisted reproductive techniques has also substantially improved the ability of couples with infertility to have biological children. This Seminar aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the assessment and management of men with infertility, along with current controversies and future endeavours.

Practical Clinical and Diagnostic Pathway for the Investigation of the Infertile Couple

Capsule

This expert opinion summarizes current knowledge on risk factors for infertility and identifies a practical clinical and diagnostic approach for the male and female partners of an infertile couple aimed to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems.

Background

Infertility represents an important and growing health problem affecting up to 16% of couples worldwide. In most cases, male, female, or combined factor can be identified, and different causes or risk factors have been related to this condition. However, there are no standardized guidelines on the clinical-diagnostic approach of infertile couples and the recommendations concerning infertility are sometimes lacking, incomplete, or problematic to apply.

Objective

The aim of this work is to provide an appropriate clinical and diagnostic pathway for infertile couples designed by a multidisciplinary-team of experts. The rationale is based on the history and physical examination and then oriented on the basis of initial investigations. This approach could be applied in order to reduce variation in practice and to improve the investigation and management of fertility problems.

Methods

Prominent Italian experts of the main specialties committed in the ART procedures, including gynecologists, andrologists, embryologists, biologists, geneticists, oncologists, and microbiologists, called "InfertilItaly group", used available evidence to develop this expert position.

Outcomes

Starting from the individuation of the principal risk factors that may influence the fertility of females and males and both genders, the work group identified most appropriate procedures using a gradual approach to both partners aimed to obtain a precise diagnosis and the most effective therapeutic option, reducing invasive and occasionally redundant procedures.

Conclusions

This expert position provides current knowledge on risk factors and suggests a diagnostic workflow of infertile couples. By using this step-by-step approach, health care workers involved in ART, may individuate a practical clinical management of infertile couples shared by experts.

Y chromosome structural variation in infertile men detected by targeted next-generation sequencing

PURPOSE

To provide a validated method to identify copy number variation (CNV) in regions of the Y chromosome of infertile men by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

METHODS

Semen analysis was used to determine the quality of semen and diagnose infertility. Deletion of the azoospermia factor (AZF) region in the Y chromosome was detected by a routine sequence-tagged-site PCR (STS-PCR) method. We then used the NGS method to detect CNV in the AZF region, including deletions and duplications.

RESULTS

A total of 326 samples from male infertility patients, family members, and sperm donors were studied between January 2011 and May 2017. AZF microdeletions were detected in 120 patients by STS-PCR, and these results were consistent with the results from NGS. In addition, of the 160 patients and male family members who had no microdeletions detected by STS-PCR, 51 cases were found to exhibit Y chromosome structural variations by the NGS method (31.88%, 51/160). No microdeletions were found in 46 donors by STS-PCR, but the NGS method revealed 11 of these donors (23.91%, 11/46) carried structural variations, which were mainly in the AZFc region, including partial deletions and duplications.

CONCLUSION

The established NGS method can replace the conventional STS-PCR method to detect Y chromosome microdeletions. The NGS method can detect CNV, such as partial deletion or duplication, and provide details of the abnormal range and size of variations.

Effect of Y Chromosome Microdeletions on the Pregnancy Outcome of Assisted Reproduction Technology: a Meta-analysis

This systematic analysis aimed to summarize the effects of Y chromosome microdeletions (YCMs) on pregnancy outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART). This retrospective controlled meta-analysis evaluated the effect of YCMs on pregnancy outcomes of ART. Full-text retrieval was conducted in the PubMed, CBM, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG databases. The pregnancy outcomes included fertilization rate, good embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, and baby boy rate. The quality of these studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Statistical software Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 14.0 were used. Twelve high-quality studies were included in the analysis. Compared with that in the normal group, the fertilization rate in the YCMs group decreased significantly (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.63, 0.88], P = 0.0006). However, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between groups in the good embryo rate (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.72, 1.07]), clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.78, 1.11]), early miscarriage rate (OR = 1.70, 95% CI [0.93, 3.10]), miscarriage rate (OR = 1.3, 95% CI [0.93, 1.91]), live birth rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.74, 1.08]), and baby boy rate (OR = 1.15, 95% CI [0.85, 1.56]). YCMs are associated with a reduced fertilization rate of ART, but they do not decrease the good embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, or baby boy rate.

Association of MSY haplotype background with nonobstructive azoospermia is AZF-dependent: A case-control study

Identifying causal genes of spermatogenic failure on the male-specific region of Y chromosome (MSY) has been a challenging process. Due to the nonrecombining nature of MSY, haplotype-based approaches have recently been shown to be promising in identifying associated MSY haplogroups. We conducted an MSY analysis of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients in a case-control setting (N = 278 and 105 respectively) to identify modal haplogroups strongly associated with NOA. Patients with AZF deletions (AZF+) and no AZF deletions (AZF-) were compared with the control group. Given the larger sample set of AZF- NOA patients, we further investigated the association based on histopathological severity, namely Sertoli cell-only syndrome and maturation arrest subtypes. We observed no significant enrichment of MSY haplogroups in AZF- azoospermic patients (or its subtypes). However, we observed a strongly significant association between haplogroup J2a* and AZF+ patients (FDR-corrected p = .0056; OR = 7.02, 95%CI 1.89 to 39.20), a haplogroup which also showed significant enrichment for AZFa/b deletions (p = 4x10^-4 ). We conclude that unlike AZF+ patients, AZF- NOA are less likely to have an MSY causative factor with large effect size, thus indicating that the aetiology of AZF- NOA, and to some extent AZFc NOA, is more likely to be based on non-MSY factors.