The effects of dapagliflozin on hepatic and visceral fat in type 2 diabetes patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Adipokines in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Are We on the Road toward New Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets?

Simple Summary

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an unmet medical need due to its increasingly high incidence, severe clinical consequences, and the absence of feasible diagnostic tools and effective drugs. This review summarizes the preclinical and clinical data on adipokines, cytokine-like hormones secreted by adipose tissue, and NAFLD. The aim is to establish the potential of adipokines as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, as well as their potential as therapeutic targets for NAFLD. The limitations of current research are also discussed, and future perspectives are outlined.

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the major cause of chronic hepatic illness and the leading indication for liver transplantation in the future decades. NAFLD is also commonly associated with other high-incident non-communicable diseases, such as cardiovascular complications, type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Aggravating the socio-economic impact of this complex pathology, routinely feasible diagnostic methodologies and effective drugs for NAFLD management are unavailable. The pathophysiology of NAFLD, recently defined as metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), is correlated with abnormal adipose tissue–liver axis communication because obesity-associated white adipose tissue (WAT) inflammation and metabolic dysfunction prompt hepatic insulin resistance (IR), lipid accumulation (steatosis), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and fibrosis. Accumulating evidence links adipokines, cytokine-like hormones secreted by adipose tissue that have immunometabolic activity, with NAFLD pathogenesis and progression; however, much uncertainty still exists. Here, the current knowledge on the roles of leptin, adiponectin, ghrelin, resistin, retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), visfatin, chemerin, and adipocyte fatty-acid-binding protein (AFABP) in NAFLD, taken from preclinical to clinical studies, is overviewed. The effect of therapeutic interventions on adipokines’ circulating levels are also covered. Finally, future directions to address the potential of adipokines as therapeutic targets and disease biomarkers for NAFLD are discussed.

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease complicated by type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study

Background and Aim

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide treatment in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) complicated by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

This was a single‐arm, open‐label pilot study. Sixteen patients with NAFLD who received oral semaglutide for T2DM were included in the analysis. Oral semaglutide was initiated at a dose of 3 mg once daily, and the dose was sequentially increased to 7 mg at 4 weeks and 14 mg at 8 weeks (maintenance dose) until the end of the 24‐week trial.

Results

Body weight and levels of liver‐related biochemistry, plasma glucose, and hemoglobin A1c decreased significantly from baseline to 12 weeks. These significant decreases were maintained until the end of the trial. Additionally, levels of the homeostasis model assessment‐insulin resistance and triglyceride significantly decreased at 24 weeks. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) values significantly decreased from baseline to 24 weeks. Changes in body weight were correlated with those in levels of alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.52) and CAP (r = 0.72). As for liver fibrosis markers, significant decreases from baseline to 24 weeks in levels of the fibrosis‐4 index, ferritin, and type IV collagen 7 s were found; however, the liver stiffness measurement did not significantly decrease. Most adverse events were grade 1–2 transient gastrointestinal disorders.

Conclusions

Oral semaglutide treatment in patients with NAFLD complicated by T2DM improved impaired liver function, hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, and hepatic steatosis, as well as improving diabetic status and reducing body weight.

Cellular interplay between cardiomyocytes and non-myocytes in diabetic cardiomyopathy

Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) frequently exhibit a distinctive cardiac phenotype known as diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiac complications associated with T2DM include cardiac inflammation, hypertrophy, fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in the early stages of the disease, which can progress to systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Effective therapeutic options for diabetic cardiomyopathy are limited and often have conflicting results. The lack of effective treatments for diabetic cardiomyopathy is due in part, to our poor understanding of the disease development and progression, as well as a lack of robust and valid preclinical human models that can accurately recapitulate the pathophysiology of the human heart. In addition to cardiomyocytes, the heart contains a heterogeneous population of non-myocytes including fibroblasts, vascular cells, autonomic neurons and immune cells. These cardiac non-myocytes play important roles in cardiac homeostasis and disease, yet the effect of hyperglycaemia and hyperlipidaemia on these cell types are often overlooked in preclinical models of diabetic cardiomyopathy. The advent of human induced pluripotent stem cells provides a new paradigm in which to model diabetic cardiomyopathy as they can be differentiated into all cell types in the human heart. This review will discuss the roles of cardiac non-myocytes and their dynamic intercellular interactions in the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy. We will also discuss the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as a therapy for diabetic cardiomyopathy and their known impacts on non-myocytes. These developments will no doubt facilitate the discovery of novel treatment targets for preventing the onset and progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus thiazolidinediones for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A network meta-analysis

AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of chronic liver disorders worldwide. Some hypoglycemic drugs can improve NAFLD. However, it is unclear which of these types of hypoglycemic drugs are more effective for NAFLD. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to determine the effect of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on NAFLD patients.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Medline was conducted, and the literature from database inception up to April 30, 2021 was obtained. Liver function tests, lipid profiles, body mass index (BMI) and glycemic parameters were obtained from randomized controlled trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes, and the I2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies.

RESULTS

In total, 22 trials, including 1361 patients, were selected. In direct meta-analysis, GLP-1 receptor agonists were superior to TZDs in decreasing alanine aminotransferase (WMD, -0.40, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.20), γ-glutamyl transferase (WMD, -5.00, 95% CI: -6.47 to -3.53), BMI (WMD, -4.10, 95%CI: -6.55 to -1.65) and triglycerides (WMD, - 0.50, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.32). Based on Bayesian network meta-analysis, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on weight loss was superior to that of TZDs (WMD, -1.80, 95%CI: -3.30 to -0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors improved liver enzymes, BMI, blood lipid, blood glucose and insulin resistance in NAFLD patients.

Effects of dapagliflozin in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dapagliflozin as a treatment option in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has received increasing attention, however, the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin for NAFLD has not been well assessed. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize these RCTs and evaluate the efficacy of dapagliflozin for patients with NAFLD.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for RCTs comparing dapagliflozin with placebo or active comparator in patients with NAFLD from inception to Oct 2021.

RESULTS

We included seven trials with 390 randomized participants in total. Compared to the placebo or control group, dapagliflozin could reduce the levels of alanine aminotransferase(ALT) (WMD: -6.62U/L; 95%CI: -12.66,-0.58; p = 0.03) and aspartate aminotransaminase(AST) (WMD: -4.20U/L; 95%CI: -7.92,-0.47; p = 0.03). However, dapagliflozin produced a non-significant decrease in gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels (WMD: -7.28U/L; 95%CI: -16.26,1.71; p = 0.11). Additionally, we showed that dapagliflozin significantly affect Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (WMD: -0.88; 95%CI: -1.43,-0.33; p = 0.002). Metabolic outcomes, such as bodyweight (WMD: -3.79 Kg; 95%CI: -4.63,-2.95; p < 0.00001), body mass index (BMI) (WMD: -1.33 Kg/m²; 95%CI: -2.37,-0.28; p = 0.01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD: -2.66 mg/dL; 95%CI: -3.99,-1.32; p < 0.00001) and triglycerides (TG) (WMD: -16.77 mg/dL; 95%CI: -31.93,-1.61; p = 0.03) were also reduced. Meanwhile, we found that dapagliflozin increased total cholesterol (TC) (WMD: 9.77 mg/dL; 95%CI: 1.58,17.97; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total adverse events between the dapagliflozin group and the control group (RR = 0.96; 95%CI: 0.60,1.54; p = 0.86).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that dapagliflozin effectively improves liver function parameters and metabolic outcomes among patients with NAFLD. At the same time, treatment with dapagliflozin may increase total cholesterol.

Dapagliflozin for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have assessed the use of dapagliflozin for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in adults with NAFLD.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs that assessed the use of dapagliflozin in patients with NAFLD. Risk ratios and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were used to synthesize the results. Two authors independently extracted the data, evaluated the study quality and calculated pooled estimates.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 839 patients were included. Compared with the control conditions, dapagliflozin led to a greater decrease in alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, triglyceride, body weight, body mass index, HbA1c, and fasting plasma glucose. No difference was found between the dapagliflozin and control groups in terms of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fibrosis 4 index, type IV collagen 7S, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, or adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin can markedly reduce hepatic enzymes and metabolic indicators and improve body composition, indicating its potential therapeutic efficacy.

Efficacy of Off-Label Therapy for Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Improving Non-invasive and Invasive Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective

To evaluate the effects of vitamin E, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Design

A network meta-analysis.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from their inception until September 1, 2021.

Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of four different drugs in patients with NAFLD were included. All superiority, non-inferiority, phase II and III, non-blinded, single-blinded, and double-blinded trials were included. Interventions of interest included vitamin E (α-tocopherol and δ-tocotrienol), pioglitazone, three kinds of GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide), four SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ipragliflozin, and tofogliflozin), and comparisons of these different drugs, and placebos.

Main Outcome Measures

The outcome measures included changes in non-invasive tests [alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, liver fat content (LFC), and keratin-18 (K-18)] and invasive tests [fibrosis score and resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)].

Results

Twenty-seven trials including 3,416 patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. Results refer to vitamin E, pioglitazone, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitors. First, placebos were used as a reference. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to placebo in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide, ipragliflozin, and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than a placebo. Semaglutide, pioglitazone, and dapagliflozin were superior to placebo in decreasing the AST level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than a placebo. Liraglutide was superior to placebo in decreasing CAP. Liraglutide, pioglitazone, and vitamin E induced a significantly higher increase in resolution of NASH than a placebo. As for pairwise comparisons, semaglutide and pioglitazone were superior to liraglutide in decreasing the ALT level. Semaglutide induced a significantly higher decrease in the ALT level than dulaglutide. Semaglutide was obviously superior to empagliflozin, liraglutide, dulaglutide, and tofogliflozin in decreasing the AST level. Pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the GGT level than ipragliflozin. δ-Tocotrienol was superior to liraglutide in decreasing the GGT level. Tofogliflozin and pioglitazone induced a significantly higher decrease in the K-18 level than dulaglutide. Pioglitazone was superior to vitamin E in increasing the resolution of NASH. Furthermore, liraglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing CAP and ELF scores and increasing the resolution of NASH. Pioglitazone treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing LFC and fibrosis scores. Tofogliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing K-18, while dapagliflozin treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the GGT level. Semaglutide treatment had the highest SUCRA ranking in decreasing the levels of ALT and AST.

Conclusion

The network meta-analysis provided evidence for the efficacy of vitamin E, pioglitazone, SGLT2 inhibitors, and GLP-1 receptor agonists in treating patients with NAFLD. To find the best guide-level drugs, it is necessary to include more RCTs with these off-label drugs, so that patients and clinicians can make optimal decisions together.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier: CRD42021283129.