Transit-Time Flow Measurement as a Predictor of Coronary Bypass Graft Failure at One Year Angiographic Follow-Up

Relationship of Intraoperative Transit Time Flowmetry Findings to Angiographic Graft Patency at Follow-Up

Early and late graft occlusion remains a significant complication of coronary artery bypass grafting. Transit time flowmetry is the most commonly used imaging technique to assess graft patency intraoperatively. Although the value of transit time flowmetry for intraoperative quality control of coronary anastomosis is well established, its standard variables for predicting eventual graft failure remain controversial. This review readdresses the issue of intraoperative transit time flowmetry, with a particular emphasis on defining cutoff values for standard variables and correlating them with the ability to predict midterm and long-term graft patency for arterial and venous conduits. Further research is warranted to support clinically useful recommendations on the intraoperative application and interpretation of transit time flowmetry.

Temporary biventricular pacing improves bypass graft flows in coronary artery bypass graft patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

We have previously demonstrated the impact of univentricular pacing modalities on bypass graft flow (BGF) in the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patient with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to determine the mechanism of this improved coronary conduit and, in addition, to explore the possible benefits with biventricular pacing in patients with and without severe left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS

In 43 CABG patients [mean age 69.5 ± 1.3 years; ejection fraction (EF) 49 ± 2%] with AF, we analysed coronary vascular resistances (CVRs) and the contemporary changes in the BGF obtained during right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT), right- (RV), left- (LV) and right-left ventricular pacing (biventricular pacing, BiVP) using the ultrasonic transit-time methodology.

RESULTS

BiVP resulted in the highest percentage decrease of CVR in the overall study group by 17.5 ± 3.0% (P < 0.001), followed by RVOT pacing with 13.9 ± 3.9%. Accordingly, the highest mean BGF was achieved during BiVP, resulting in a 21.6 ± 2.6% increase when compared with no pacing and 16 ± 3.7% when compared with RV pacing. Analysis of patients according to their preoperative LV function (EF ≥50%, n = 26; EF <50%, n = 17) showed significantly lower CVR (P < 0.037) and higher BGF during BiVP in patients with lower EF.

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of an additional LV pacing wire offered a significant improvement in BGF by minimizing CVR in patients with AF and poor EF.