51
|
Solaini L, Cucchetti A, Piccino M, Gardini A, La Barba G, Serenari M, Cescon M, Ercolani G. Critical systematic review on hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol 2019; 15:439-449. [PMID: 30620230 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Whether to submit to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic resection (HR) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a debated issue. We conducted a systematic review to critically analyze what evidence supports the use of TACE, in a specific clinical condition that can define HCC as 'intermediate'. In addition, we analyzed literature regarding the comparison between TACE and HR. Direct comparisons, between HR and TACE, strongly support the adoption of surgery for patients with large or multinodular HCCs since, albeit 'nonideal' surgical candidates, these patients can still obtain a survival benefit. Multidisciplinary teams can mitigate the different decision-making approach of surgeons and hepatologists with the aim of obtaining the best quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Solaini
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, 47121, Italy
- Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, 47121, Italy
- Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Marco Piccino
- Division of General & Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, 37134, Italy
| | - Andrea Gardini
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, 47121, Italy
| | - Giuliano La Barba
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, 47121, Italy
| | - Matteo Serenari
- Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncology Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, 47121, Italy
- Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
IL-6 and IL-8 Serum Levels Predict Tumor Response and Overall Survival after TACE for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19061766. [PMID: 29899223 PMCID: PMC6032291 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19061766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
While surgical resection represents the standard potentially curative therapy for liver cancer, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has evolved as a standard therapy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as liver metastases. However, it is still not fully understood which patients particularly benefit from TACE. Cytokines represent a broad category of signaling molecules that might reflect concomitant inflammation as an adverse prognostic factor. Here, we evaluated the role of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and CC-chemokine ligand (CCL)22 as biomarkers in the context of TACE treatment. Cytokine serum levels were analyzed by multiplex immunoassay in 54 patients (HCC: n = 44, liver metastases: n = 10) undergoing TACE as well as 51 healthy controls. Patients with primary and secondary liver cancer showed significantly elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-8 but not CCL22 compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, low pre-interventional levels of IL-6 and IL-8 were predictors for an objective response after TACE in binary logistic regression. In contrast, patients with high pre-interventional IL-6 and IL-8 serum levels not only poorly responded to TACE but had a significantly impaired overall survival. Serum levels of IL-6 and IL-8 represent promising biomarkers for patients undergoing TACE and might help to pre-interventionally identify patients who particularly benefit from TACE regarding objective treatment response and overall survival.
Collapse
|
53
|
Mähringer-Kunz A, Weinmann A, Schmidtmann I, Koch S, Schotten S, Pinto Dos Santos D, Pitton MB, Dueber C, Galle PR, Kloeckner R. Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:489. [PMID: 29703174 PMCID: PMC5923193 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4407-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Transarterial chemoembolisation is the standard of care for intermediate stage (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma, but it is challenging to decide when to repeat or stop treatment. Here we performed the first external validation of the SNACOR (tumour Size and Number, baseline Alpha-fetoprotein, Child-Pugh and Objective radiological Response) risk prediction model. Methods A total of 1030 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial chemoembolisation at our tertiary referral centre from January 2000 to December 2016. We determined the following variables that were needed to calculate the SNACOR at baseline: tumour size and number, alpha-fetoprotein level, Child-Pugh class, and objective radiological response after the first transarterial chemoembolisation. Overall survival, time-dependent area under receiver-operating characteristic curves, Harrell’s C-index, and the integrated Brier score were calculated to assess predictive ability. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of survival. Results The study included 268 patients. Low, intermediate, and high SNACOR scores predicted a median survival of 31.5, 19.9, and 9.2 months, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for overall survival were 0.641, 0.633, and 0.609 at 1, 3, and 6 years, respectively. Harrell’s C-index was 0.59, and the integrated Brier Score was 0.175. Independent predictors of survival included tumour size (P < 0.001), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (P < 0.001) and Child-Pugh class (P < 0.004). Objective radiological response (P = 0.821) and tumour number (P = 0.127) were not additional independent predictors of survival. Conclusions The SNACOR risk prediction model can be used to identify patients with a dismal prognosis after the first transarterial chemoembolisation who are unlikely to benefit from further transarterial chemoembolisation. However, Harrell’s C-index showed only moderate performance. Accordingly, this risk prediction model can only serve as one of several components used to make the decision about whether to repeat treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Mähringer-Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Clinical Registry Unit (CRU), Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Irene Schmidtmann
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sandra Koch
- Clinical Registry Unit (CRU), Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schotten
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Michael Bernhard Pitton
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Dueber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Robert Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckst. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Novel Albumin-Bilirubin Grade-Based Risk Prediction Model for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Chemoembolization. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:1062-1071. [PMID: 29442276 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-4934-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade has been suggested as a better surrogate for hepatic functional reserve for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). AIMS We developed and validated a novel prediction model to predict outcome for HCC patients who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a first-line therapy. METHODS From a multivariate Cox regression model for overall survival, five objective variables (ALBI grade), the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage, response after the first TACE session, Alpha-fetoprotein level, and sex were chosen and the ABRAS score was developed from the derivation cohort (n = 476) and scored to generate an 8-point risk prediction model. The model's prognostic performance was assessed in the randomly assigned internal validation set (n = 475) and external validation set (n = 243). RESULTS The ALBI grade was able to stratify patient survival within the same Child-Pugh class. The time-dependent area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) for overall survival at 1 and 3 years were 0.78 and 0.73 in the training set, 0.78 and 0.71 in the internal validation set, and 0.70 and 0.65 in the external validation set, respectively. When stratified by BCLC stage, ABRAS score at a cutoff point of more than 3, 4, and 5 for BCLC stage 0/A, B, and C could identify subset of patients with dismal prognosis. CONCLUSION ABRAS score was useful in estimating prognosis for patients who underwent TACE as a first-line therapy. This score can be useful in planning and guiding treatment strategies with TACE, which warrants prospective validation.
Collapse
|
55
|
Xuan ZD, Zhou L, Wang Y, Zheng X. Prognostic value of the combination of serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor, C-reactive protein and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with primary liver cancer who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:1169-1178. [PMID: 29048943 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1395284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Dong Xuan
- The 3rd Department of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Li Zhou
- The 3rd Department of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yu Wang
- The 3rd Department of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Xue Zheng
- The 3rd Department of Ultrasound, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Jia J, Tateishi R, Han KH, Chawla YK, Shiina S, Jafri W, Payawal DA, Ohki T, Ogasawara S, Chen PJ, Lesmana CRA, Lesmana LA, Gani RA, Obi S, Dokmeci AK, Sarin SK. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int 2017; 11:317-370. [PMID: 28620797 PMCID: PMC5491694 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-017-9799-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1612] [Impact Index Per Article: 201.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
There is great geographical variation in the distribution of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with the majority of all cases worldwide found in the Asia-Pacific region, where HCC is one of the leading public health problems. Since the "Toward Revision of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) HCC Guidelines" meeting held at the 25th annual conference of the APASL in Tokyo, the newest guidelines for the treatment of HCC published by the APASL has been discussed. This latest guidelines recommend evidence-based management of HCC and are considered suitable for universal use in the Asia-Pacific region, which has a diversity of medical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Kofu-city, Yamanashi, Japan.
- The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ann-Lii Cheng
- Department of Oncology and Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University Cancer Center and Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division and Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jidong Jia
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Ryosuke Tateishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kwang-Hyub Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoghesh K Chawla
- Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shuichiro Shiina
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wasim Jafri
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University and Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Takamasa Ohki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Pei-Jer Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana
- Digestive Disease and GI Oncology Center, Medistra Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Laurentius A Lesmana
- Digestive Disease and GI Oncology Center, Medistra Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Rino A Gani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Shuntaro Obi
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - A Kadir Dokmeci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Shiv Kumar Sarin
- Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Kirstein MM, Schweitzer N, Ay N, Boeck C, Lappas K, Hinrichs JB, Voigtländer T, Wacker F, Manns MP, Rodt T, Vogel A. Experience from a real-life cohort: outcome of 606 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma following transarterial chemoembolization. Scand J Gastroenterol 2017; 52:116-124. [PMID: 27598949 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1233579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancers. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been accepted as the standard care for intermediate stage disease. METHODS In this study, we characterized 606 with HCC patients from Hannover Medical School treated with TACE. RESULTS 606 with HCC patients treated with TACE were identified between 2000 and 2015. Most patients (59.8%) were at intermediate stage. Following TACE, most patients subsequently received systemic therapy or best supportive care (BSC), whereas 227 (37.5%) patients were bridged to potentially curative local treatments. Depending on subsequent therapies, median post-TACE survival ranged from 7 to 162 months. Ascites, cholinesterase, c-reactive and alpha-feto protein and tumor size were identified as prognostic factors. These factors as well as the HAP, mHAP-II and STATE score also determined post-TACE survival independent of subsequent therapies. Hepatic function progressively deteriorated with repeated TACE sessions. Despite that, post-TACE survival was not shortened in frequently treated patients (≥5 times) as compared to patients treated 4 times or less (p = not significant [n.s.]). Patients treated ≥5 times with TACE received significantly more often systemic therapy following TACE (37.3%) as compared to patients with 3-4 (30.1%), 2 (27.4%) and 1 (21.8%) sessions (p < .05). CONCLUSION TACE is performed in a heterogeneous population as bridging therapy to other local treatments and palliative therapy. The long-term survival following TACE is determined by baseline tumor, patient-related factors and by subsequent therapies. Post-TACE survival is not shorter in patients with frequent treatments (≥5), and the rate of subsequent systemic treatments is higher compared to less frequently treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha M Kirstein
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Nora Schweitzer
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Nazli Ay
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Christina Boeck
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Katerina Lappas
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Jan B Hinrichs
- b Institute for Radiology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Torsten Voigtländer
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Frank Wacker
- b Institute for Radiology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Michael P Manns
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Thomas Rodt
- b Institute for Radiology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- a Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Zhang YF, Guo RP, OuYang HY, Shen JX, Zhao J, Tan GS, Le Y, Wei W, Shi M. Target lesion response predicts survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma retreated with transarterial chemoembolization. Liver Int 2016; 36:1516-24. [PMID: 27105296 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The discontinuation rules of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients who were assessed as progressive disease (PD) but stage progression-free (SP-free: still belongs to Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B) after TACE are unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the PD-pattern on the survival of these patients retreated with TACE. METHODS In total, 115 consecutive patients who were assessed as PD but SP-free after TACE and then underwent at least one subsequent TACE session were included. Sixty patients were assessed as PD with target lesion progression (TP), and 55 patients were assessed as PD with target lesion non-progression (TNP). Survival and treatment-related adverse events were compared between the two groups. Additional external validation was performed using a data set (n = 103) from another institution. RESULTS Patients with TNP had significantly longer median post-progression survival (PPS) than those with TP (21.0 vs. 11.9 months, P = 0.004). After TACE retreatment, the incidence of liver dysfunction was significantly higher for patients with TP than for patients with TNP (45% vs. 20%, P = 0.031). In the multivariate analysis, the target lesion response was one of the most significant prognostic factors for PPS (HR = 2.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.27; P = 0.005). The findings were supported by an independent external cohort. CONCLUSIONS Compared to patients with TNP, patients with TP might exhibit no improvement in survival and even present damaged liver function after retreatment with TACE. Target lesion response is useful as a clinical decision for repeated TACE in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong-Fa Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong-Ping Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Han-Yue OuYang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing-Xian Shen
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Tan
- Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Le
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Shi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China. .,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Kloeckner R, Pitton MB, Dueber C, Schmidtmann I, Galle PR, Koch S, Wörns MA, Weinmann A. Validation of Clinical Scoring Systems ART and ABCR after Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 28:94-102. [PMID: 27562621 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform an external validation of the Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization (ART) and α-fetoprotein (AFP), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Child-Pugh, and response (ABCR) scores and to compare them in terms of prognostic power. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2000 to 2015, 871 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial chemoembolization at a tertiary referral hospital, and 176 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria for both scores and were analyzed. Nineteen percent (n = 34) had BCLC stage A disease and 81% had stage B disease. Thirty-nine patients (22%) presented with elevated AFP levels. Overall survival was calculated. Scores were validated and compared with a Harrell C-index, integrated Brier score (IBS), and prediction error curves. RESULTS Before the second chemoembolization procedure, 22 patients (12%) showed an increase of 1 point in Child-Pugh score and 51 patients (22%) had an increase of ≥ 2 points. Thirty-one patients (23%) showed a > 25% increase in aspartate aminotransferase level, and 114 (65%) showed a response to treatment. Consequently, 127 patients (72%) had a low ART score and 49 (28%) had a high ART score. One hundred fifty-eight patients (90%) had a low ABCR score, whereas 18 (10%) had a high ABCR score. Low and high ART score groups had median survival durations of 20.8 and 15.3 mo, respectively. Harrell C-indexes were 0.572 and 0.608, and IBSs were 0.135 and 0.128, for ART and ABCR, respectively. For both scores, an increase in Child-Pugh score ≥ 2 points and a radiologic response were significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS Both scores were of limited predictive value, and neither was sufficient to support clear-cut clinical decisions. Further effort is necessary to determine criteria for making valid clinical predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - Michael B Pitton
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Dueber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Irene Schmidtmann
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sandra Koch
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; Clinical Registry Unit, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus A Wörns
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; Clinical Registry Unit, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; Clinical Registry Unit, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Cucchetti A, Cappelli A, Golfieri R. Reply to External validation of an individual prognostic calculator after trans-arterial chemo-embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2016; 36:1232. [PMID: 27403768 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberta Cappelli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Cappelli A, Cucchetti A, Cabibbo G, Mosconi C, Maida M, Attardo S, Pettinari I, Pinna AD, Golfieri R. Refining prognosis after trans-arterial chemo-embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2016; 36:729-736. [PMID: 26604044 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS To develop an individual prognostic calculator for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE). METHODS Data from two prospective databases, regarding 361 patients who received TACE as first-line therapy (2000-2012), were reviewed in order to refine available prognostic tools and to develop a continuous individual web-based prognostic calculator. Patients with neoplastic portal vein invasion were excluded from the analysis. The model was built following a bootstrap resampling procedure aimed at identifying prognostic predictors and by carrying out a 10-fold cross-validation for accuracy assessment by means of Harrell's c-statistic. RESULTS Number of tumours, serum albumin, serum total bilirubin, alpha-foetoprotein and maximum tumour size were selected as predictors of mortality following TACE with the bootstrap resampling technique. In the 10-fold cross-validation cohort, the model showed a Harrell's c-statistic of 0.649 (95% CI: 0.610-0.688), significantly higher than that of the Hepatoma Arterial-embolization Prognostic (HAP) score (0.589; 95% CI: 0.552-0.626; P = 0.001) and of the modified HAP-II score (0.611; 95% CI: 0.572-0.650; P = 0.005). Akaike's information criterion for the model was 2520; for the mHAP-II it was 2544 and for the HAP score it was 2554. A web-based calculator was developed for quick consultation at http://www.livercancer.eu/mhap3.html. CONCLUSIONS The proposed individual prognostic model can provide an accurate prognostic prediction for each patient with unresectable HCC following treatment with TACE without class stratification. The availability of an online calculator can help physicians in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberta Cappelli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cabibbo
- Section of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marcello Maida
- Section of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Simona Attardo
- Section of Gastroenterology, DIBIMIS, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Irene Pettinari
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio D Pinna
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|