RETRACTED: Noncoding RNAs of trithorax response elements recruit Drosophila Ash1 to Ultrabithorax

A major epigenetic programming mechanism guided by piRNAs

A central enigma in epigenetics is how epigenetic factors are guided to specific genomic sites for their function. Previously, we reported that a Piwi-piRNA complex associates with the piRNA-complementary site in the Drosophila genome and regulates its epigenetic state. Here, we report that Piwi-piRNA complexes bind to numerous piRNA-complementary sequences throughout the genome, implicating piRNAs as a major mechanism that guides Piwi and Piwi-associated epigenetic factors to program the genome. To test this hypothesis, we demonstrate that inserting piRNA-complementary sequences to an ectopic site leads to Piwi, HP1a, and Su(var)3-9 recruitment to the site as well as H3K9me2/3 enrichment and reduced RNA polymerase II association, indicating that piRNA is both necessary and sufficient to recruit Piwi and epigenetic factors to specific genomic sites. Piwi deficiency drastically changed the epigenetic landscape and polymerase II profile throughout the genome, revealing the Piwi-piRNA mechanism as a major epigenetic programming mechanism in Drosophila.

Strategies to identify long noncoding RNAs involved in gene regulation

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been detected in nearly every cell type and found to be fundamentally involved in many biological processes. The characterization of lncRNAs has immense potential to advance our comprehensive understanding of cellular processes and gene regulation, along with implications for the treatment of human disease. The recent ENCODE (Encyclopedia of DNA Elements) study reported 9,640 lncRNA loci in the human genome, which corresponds to around half the number of protein-coding genes. Because of this sheer number and their functional diversity, it is crucial to identify a pool of potentially relevant lncRNAs early on in a given study. In this review, we evaluate the methods for isolating lncRNAs by immunoprecipitation and review the advantages, disadvantages, and applications of three widely used approaches – microarray, tiling array, and RNA-seq – for identifying lncRNAs involved in gene regulation. We also look at ways in which data from publicly available databases such as ENCODE can support the study of lncRNAs.

A novel molecular mechanism in human genetic disease: a DNA repeat-derived lncRNA

Two thirds of the human genome is composed of repetitive sequences. Despite their prevalence, DNA repeats are largely ignored. The vast majority of our genome is transcribed to produce non protein-coding RNAs. Among these, long non protein-coding RNAs represent the most prevalent and functionally diverse class. The relevance of the non protein-coding genome to human disease has mainly been studied regarding the altered microRNA expression and function in human cancer. On the contrary, the elucidation of the involvement of long non-coding RNAs in disease is only in its infancy. We have recently found that a chromatin associated, long non protein-coding RNA regulates a Polycomb/Trithorax epigenetic switch at the basis of the repeat associated facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, a common muscle disorder. Based on this, we propose that long non-coding RNAs produced by repetitive sequences contribute in shaping the epigenetic landscape in normal human physiology and in disease.

Epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis

Epigenetic regulation is required not only for development, but also for tissue homeostasis, which is maintained via the self-renewal and differentiation of somatic stem cells. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic regulators play critical roles in the maintenance of both self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells and leukemic stem cells. Recent genome-wide comprehensive analyses have identified mutations in epigenetic regulator genes, including genes whose products modify DNA and histones in hematological malignancies. Among these epigenetic regulators, repressive histone modifications by Polycomb-group complexes have been most fully characterized in hematopoietic stem cells, and are recognized as general regulators of stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are controlled by both cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic regulators, including transcription factors, signal transduction pathways, and niche factors. However, there is little insight into the mechanism of how epigenetic regulators act in concert with these factors to ensure blood homeostasis. In this review, we highlight recent findings in epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis with emphasis on the role of Polycomb-group proteins and DNA-methylation modulators in hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny.

Genome-wide analysis reveals distinct patterns of epigenetic features in long non-coding RNA loci

A major fraction of the transcriptome of higher organisms comprised an extensive repertoire of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) which express in a cell type and development stage-specific manner. While lncRNAs are a proven component of epigenetic gene expression modulation, epigenetic regulation of lncRNA itself remains poorly understood. Here we have analysed pan-genomic DNA methylation and histone modification marks (H3K4me3, H3K9me3, H3K27me3 and H3K36me3) associated with transcription start site (TSS) of lncRNA in four different cell types and three different tissue types representing various cellular stages. We observe that histone marks associated with active transcription H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 along with the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 have similar distribution pattern around TSS irrespective of cell types. Also, the density of these marks correlates well with expression of protein-coding and lncRNA genes. In contrast, the lncRNA genes harbour higher methylation density around TSS than protein-coding genes regardless of their expression status. Furthermore, we found that DNA methylation along with the other repressive histone mark H3K9me3 does not seem to play a role in lncRNA expression. Thus, our observation suggests that epigenetic regulation of lncRNA shares common features with mRNA except the role of DNA methylation which is markedly dissimilar.

The activatory long non-coding RNA DBE-T reveals the epigenetic etiology of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a neuromuscular disorder often considered to be the third most common muscular dystrophy. Deletions reducing the copy number of the D4Z4 repeat in the distal end of the 4q arm are the main genetic cause of the disease. The recently highlighted research has identified a transcriptional activatory long non-coding RNA involved in the disease that acts through the recruitment of ASH1L, a protein belonging to the Trithorax family.

A long ncRNA links copy number variation to a polycomb/trithorax epigenetic switch in FSHD muscular dystrophy

Repetitive sequences account for more than 50% of the human genome. Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal-dominant disease associated with reduction in the copy number of the D4Z4 repeat mapping to 4q35. By an unknown mechanism, D4Z4 deletion causes an epigenetic switch leading to de-repression of 4q35 genes. Here we show that the Polycomb group of epigenetic repressors targets D4Z4 in healthy subjects and that D4Z4 deletion is associated with reduced Polycomb silencing in FSHD patients. We identify DBE-T, a chromatin-associated noncoding RNA produced selectively in FSHD patients that coordinates de-repression of 4q35 genes. DBE-T recruits the Trithorax group protein Ash1L to the FSHD locus, driving histone H3 lysine 36 dimethylation, chromatin remodeling, and 4q35 gene transcription. This study provides insights into the biological function of repetitive sequences in regulating gene expression and shows how mutations of such elements can influence the progression of a human genetic disease.

Identification and properties of 1,119 candidate lincRNA loci in the Drosophila melanogaster genome

The functional repertoire of long intergenic noncoding RNA (lincRNA) molecules has begun to be elucidated in mammals. Determining the biological relevance and potential gene regulatory mechanisms of these enigmatic molecules would be expedited in a more tractable model organism, such as Drosophila melanogaster. To this end, we defined a set of 1,119 putative lincRNA genes in D. melanogaster using modENCODE whole transcriptome (RNA-seq) data. A large majority (1.1 of 1.3 Mb; 85%) of these bases were not previously reported by modENCODE as being transcribed. Significant selective constraint on the sequences of these loci predicts that virtually all have sustained functionality across the Drosophila clade. We observe biases in lincRNA genomic locations and expression profiles that are consistent with some of these lincRNAs being involved in the regulation of neighboring protein-coding genes with developmental functions. We identify lincRNAs that may be important in the developing nervous system and in male-specific organs, such as the testes. LincRNA loci were also identified whose positions, relative to nearby protein-coding loci, are equivalent between D. melanogaster and mouse. This study predicts that the genomes of not only vertebrates, such as mammals, but also an invertebrate (fruit fly) harbor large numbers of lincRNA loci. Our findings now permit exploitation of Drosophila genetics for the investigation of lincRNA mechanisms, including lincRNAs with potential functional analogues in mammals.

Intergenic Polycomb target sites are dynamically marked by non-coding transcription during lineage commitment

Non-coding (nc) RNAs are involved both in recruitment of vertebrate Polycomb (PcG) proteins to chromatin, and in activation of PcG target genes. Here we investigate dynamic changes in the relationship between ncRNA transcription and recruitment of PcG proteins to chromatin during differentiation. Profiling of purified cell populations from different stages of a defined murine in vitro neural differentiation system shows that over 50% of regulated intergenic non-coding transcripts precisely correspond to PcG target sites. We designate these PcG recruiting elements as Transcribed Intergenic Polycomb (TIP) sites. The relationship between TIP transcription and PcG recruitment switches dynamically during differentiation between different states, in which transcription and PcG recruitment exclude each other, or in which both are present. Reporter assays show that transcribed TIP sites can repress a flanking gene. Knockdown experiments demonstrate that TIP ncRNAs are themselves required for repression of target genes both in cis and in trans. We propose that TIP transcription may ensure coordinated regulation of gene networks via dynamic switching and recruitment of PcG proteins both in cis and in trans during lineage commitment.

Non-coding RNAs in retinal development

Retinal development is dependent on an accurately functioning network of transcriptional and translational regulators. Among the diverse classes of molecules involved, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) play a significant role. Members of this family are present in the cell as transcripts, but are not translated into proteins. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ncRNAs that act as post-transcriptional regulators. During the last decade, they have been implicated in a variety of biological processes, including the development of the nervous system. On the other hand, long-ncRNAs (lncRNAs) represent a different class of ncRNAs that act mainly through processes involving chromatin remodeling and epigenetic mechanisms. The visual system is a prominent model to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying neurogenesis or circuit formation and function, including the differentiation of retinal progenitor cells to generate the seven principal cell classes in the retina, pathfinding decisions of retinal ganglion cell axons in order to establish the correct connectivity from the eye to the brain proper, and activity-dependent mechanisms for the functionality of visual circuits. Recent findings have associated ncRNAs in several of these processes and uncovered a new level of complexity for the existing regulatory mechanisms. This review summarizes and highlights the impact of ncRNAs during the development of the vertebrate visual system, with a specific focus on the role of miRNAs and a synopsis regarding recent findings on lncRNAs in the retina.

Genome-wide expression of non-coding RNA and global chromatin modification

Traditionally, we know that genomic DNA will produce transcripts named messenger RNA and then translate into protein following the instruction of genetic central dogma, and RNA works here as a pass-by messenger. Now increasing evidence shows that RNA is a key regulator as well as a message transmitter. It is discovered by next-generation sequencing techniques that most genomic DNA are generally transcribed to non-coding RNA, highly beyond the percentage of coding mRNA. These non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), belonging to several groups, have critical roles in many cellular processes, expanding our understanding of the RNA world. We review here the different categories of ncRNA according to genome location and how ncRNAs guide and recruit chromatin modification complex to specific loci of genome to modulate gene expression by affecting chromatin state.

Long noncoding RNA: unveiling hidden layer of gene regulatory networks

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are increasingly recognized as functional regulatory components in eukaryotic gene regulation. Distinct classes of lncRNAs have been identified in eukaryotes and they play roles in various regulatory networks. Previously characterized lncRNAs include primary transcripts for small regulatory RNAs. In the era of deep sequencing, new classes of lncRNAs have emerged as potent regulatory components in gene regulation. Recent studies showed that many lncRNAs are potent cis- and trans-regulators of gene activity and they can function as scaffolds for chromatin-modifying complexes. Furthermore, differential expressions of lncRNAs suggest that transcription of lncRNAs can modulate gene activity during development and in response to external stimuli. Here, we summarize our current understanding on potential roles of lncRNAs in plants.

Trithorax group proteins: switching genes on and keeping them active

Cellular memory is provided by two counteracting groups of chromatin proteins termed Trithorax group (TrxG) and Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. TrxG proteins activate transcription and are perhaps best known because of the involvement of the TrxG protein MLL in leukaemia. However, in terms of molecular analysis, they have lived in the shadow of their more famous counterparts, the PcG proteins. Recent advances have improved our understanding of TrxG protein function and demonstrated that the heterogeneous group of TrxG proteins is of critical importance in the epigenetic regulation of the cell cycle, senescence, DNA damage and stem cell biology.

The noncoding RNA Mistral activates Hoxa6 and Hoxa7 expression and stem cell differentiation by recruiting MLL1 to chromatin

The epigenetic activator Mixed lineage leukemia 1 (MLL1) is paramount for embryonic development and hematopoiesis. Here, we demonstrate that the long, noncoding RNA (lncRNA) Mistral (Mira) activates transcription of the homeotic genes Hoxa6 and Hoxa7 in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) by recruiting MLL1 to chromatin. The Mira gene is located in the spacer DNA region (SDR) separating Hoxa6 and Hoxa7, transcriptionally silent in mESCs, and activated by retinoic acid. Mira-mediated recruitment of MLL1 to the Mira gene triggers dynamic changes in chromosome conformation, culminating in activation of Hoxa6 and Hoxa7 transcription. Hoxa6 and Hoxa7 activate the expression of genes involved in germ layer specification during mESC differentiation in a cooperative and redundant fashion. Our results connect the lncRNA Mira with the recruitment of MLL1 to target genes and implicate lncRNAs in epigenetic activation of gene expression during vertebrate cell-fate determination.

Signals and combinatorial functions of histone modifications

Alterations of chromatin structure have been shown to be crucial for response to cell signaling and for programmed gene expression in development. Posttranslational histone modifications influence changes in chromatin structure both directly and by targeting or activating chromatin-remodeling complexes. Histone modifications intersect with cell signaling pathways to control gene expression and can act combinatorially to enforce or reverse epigenetic marks in chromatin. Through their recognition by protein complexes with enzymatic activities cross talk is established between different modifications and with other epigenetic pathways, including noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and DNA methylation. Here, we review the functions of histone modifications and their exploitation in the programming of gene expression during several events in development.

Functions of noncoding RNAs in neural development and neurological diseases

The development of the central nervous system (CNS) relies on precisely orchestrated gene expression regulation. Dysregulation of both genetic and environmental factors can affect proper CNS development and results in neurological diseases. Recent studies have shown that similar to protein coding genes, noncoding RNA molecules have a significant impact on normal CNS development and on causes and progression of human neurological disorders. In this review, we have highlighted discoveries of functions of noncoding RNAs, in particular microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs, in neural development and neurological diseases. Emerging evidence has shown that microRNAs play an essential role in many aspects of neural development, such as proliferation of neural stem cells and progenitors, neuronal differentiation, maturation, and synaptogenesis. Misregulation of microRNAs is associated with some mental disorders and neurodegeneration diseases. In addition, long noncoding RNAs are found to play a role in neural development by regulating the expression of protein coding genes. Therefore, examining noncoding RNA-mediated gene regulations has revealed novel mechanisms of neural development and provided new insights into the etiology of human neurological diseases.

Insertion of an intact CR1 retrotransposon in a cadherin gene linked with Bt resistance in the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella

Three mutations in the Pectinophora gossypiella cadherin gene PgCad1 are linked with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin Cry1Ac. Here we show that the r3 mutation entails recent insertion into PgCad1 of an active chicken repeat (CR1) retrotransposon, designated CR1-1_Pg. Unlike most other CR1 elements, CR1-1_Pg is intact, transcribed by a flanking promoter, contains target site duplications and has a relatively low number of copies. Examination of transcripts from the PgCad1 locus revealed that CR1-1_Pg disrupts both the cadherin protein and a long noncoding RNA of unknown function. Together with previously reported data, these findings show that transposable elements disrupt eight of 12 cadherin alleles linked with resistance to Cry1Ac in three lepidopteran species, indicating that the cadherin locus is a common target for disruption by transposable elements.

To repress or not to repress: this is the guardian's question

p53 is possibly the most central tumor suppressor gene of our cells, integrating stress signals to activate a transcriptional program responsible for maintaining cellular homeostasis. Many of the downstream effects of p53 are a consequence of its activity as a transcription factor, resulting in the induction of multiple target genes. In addition to gene activation, however, gene repression is an essential part of the p53 cellular response. Despite extensive research efforts towards the elucidation of p53 functions, the molecular mechanisms and biological consequences of gene repression by p53 have not been studied extensively. We review our current knowledge of the mechanisms and biological consequences of p53 repression, with special attention to recently discovered mechanisms of repression that involve non-coding RNA molecules, an emerging aspect of regulation in the p53 cellular network.

A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression

The genome is extensively transcribed into long intergenic noncoding RNAs (lincRNAs), many of which are implicated in gene silencing. Potential roles of lincRNAs in gene activation are much less understood. Development and homeostasis require coordinate regulation of neighbouring genes through a process termed locus control. Some locus control elements and enhancers transcribe lincRNAs, hinting at possible roles in long-range control. In vertebrates, 39 Hox genes, encoding homeodomain transcription factors critical for positional identity, are clustered in four chromosomal loci; the Hox genes are expressed in nested anterior-posterior and proximal-distal patterns colinear with their genomic position from 3' to 5'of the cluster. Here we identify HOTTIP, a lincRNA transcribed from the 5' tip of the HOXA locus that coordinates the activation of several 5' HOXA genes in vivo. Chromosomal looping brings HOTTIP into close proximity to its target genes. HOTTIP RNA binds the adaptor protein WDR5 directly and targets WDR5/MLL complexes across HOXA, driving histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation and gene transcription. Induced proximity is necessary and sufficient for HOTTIP RNA activation of its target genes. Thus, by serving as key intermediates that transmit information from higher order chromosomal looping into chromatin modifications, lincRNAs may organize chromatin domains to coordinate long-range gene activation.

Non-coding RNAs as regulators of embryogenesis

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are emerging as key regulators of embryogenesis. They control embryonic gene expression by several means, ranging from microRNA-induced degradation of mRNAs to long ncRNA-mediated modification of chromatin. Many aspects of embryogenesis seem to be controlled by ncRNAs, including the maternal-zygotic transition, the maintenance of pluripotency, the patterning of the body axes, the specification and differentiation of cell types and the morphogenesis of organs. Drawing from several animal model systems, we describe two emerging themes for ncRNA function: promoting developmental transitions and maintaining developmental states. These examples also highlight the roles of ncRNAs in ensuring a robust commitment to one of two possible cell fates.

Interaction of SET domains with histones and nucleic acid structures in active chromatin

Changes in the normal program of gene expression are the basis for a number of human diseases. Epigenetic control of gene expression is programmed by chromatin modifications—the inheritable “histone code”—the major component of which is histone methylation. This chromatin methylation code of gene activity is created upon cell differentiation and is further controlled by the “SET” (methyltransferase) domain proteins which maintain this histone methylation pattern and preserve it through rounds of cell division. The molecular principles of epigenetic gene maintenance are essential for proper treatment and prevention of disorders and their complications. However, the principles of epigenetic gene programming are not resolved. Here we discuss some evidence of how the SET proteins determine the required states of target genes and maintain the required levels of their activity. We suggest that, along with other recognition pathways, SET domains can directly recognize the nucleosome and nucleic acids intermediates that are specific for active chromatin regions.

Silencing chromatin: comparing modes and mechanisms

Recent transcriptome analyses show that substantial proportions of eukaryotic genomes can be copied into RNAs, many of which do not encode protein sequences. However, cells have developed mechanisms to control and counteract the high transcriptional activity of RNA polymerases in order to achieve cell-specific gene activity or to prevent the expression of deleterious sequences. Here we compare how two silencing modes - the Polycomb system and heterochromatin - are targeted, established and maintained at different chromosomal locations and how DNA-binding proteins and non-coding RNAs connect these epigenetically stable and heritable structures to the sequence information of the DNA.

Natural history of the eukaryotic chromatin protein methylation system

In eukaryotes, methylation of nucleosomal histones and other nuclear proteins is a central aspect of chromatin structure and dynamics. The past 15 years have seen an enormous advance in our understanding of the biochemistry of these modifications, and of their role in establishing the epigenetic code. We provide a synthetic overview, from an evolutionary perspective, of the main players in the eukaryotic chromatin protein methylation system, with an emphasis on catalytic domains. Several components of the eukaryotic protein methylation system had their origins in bacteria. In particular, the Rossmann fold protein methylases (PRMTs and DOT1), and the LSD1 and jumonji-related demethylases and oxidases, appear to have emerged in the context of bacterial peptide methylation and hydroxylation systems. These systems were originally involved in synthesis of peptide secondary metabolites, such as antibiotics, toxins, and siderophores. The peptidylarginine deiminases appear to have been acquired by animals from bacterial enzymes that modify cell-surface proteins. SET domain methylases, which display the β-clip fold, apparently first emerged in prokaryotes from the SAF superfamily of carbohydrate-binding domains. However, even in bacteria, a subset of the SET domains might have evolved a chromatin-related role in conjunction with a BAF60a/b-like SWIB domain protein and topoisomerases. By the time of the last eukaryotic common ancestor, multiple SET and PRMT methylases were already in place and are likely to have mediated methylation at the H3K4, H3K9, H3K36, and H4K20 positions, and carried out both asymmetric and symmetric arginine dimethylation. Inference of H3K27 methylation in the ancestral eukaryote appears uncertain, though it was certainly in place a little later in eukaryotic evolution. Current data suggest that unlike SET methylases, which are universally present in eukaryotes, demethylases are not. They appear to be absent in the earliest-branching eukaryotic lineages, and emerged later along with several other chromatin proteins, such as the Dot1-methylase, prior to divergence of the kinetoplastid-heterolobosean lineage from the remaining eukaryotes. This period also corresponds to the point of origin of DNA cytosine methylation by DNMT1. Origin of major lineages of SET domains such as the Trithorax, Su(var)3-9, Ash1, SMYD, and TTLL12 and E(Z) might have played the initial role in the establishment of multiple distinct heterochromatic and euchromatic states that are likely to have been present, in some form, through much of eukaryotic evolution. Elaboration of these chromatin states might have gone hand-in-hand with acquisition of multiple jumonji-related and LSD1-like demethylases, and functional linkages with the DNA methylation and RNAi systems. Throughout eukaryotic evolution, there were several lineage-specific expansions of SET domain proteins, which might be related to a special transcription regulation process in trypanosomes, acquisition of new meiotic recombination hotspots in animals, and methylation and associated modifications of the diatom silaffin proteins involved in silica biomineralization. The use of specific domains to "read" the methylation marks appears to have been present in the ancestral eukaryote itself. Of these the chromo-like domains appear to have been acquired from bacterial secreted proteins that might have a role in binding cell-surface peptides or peptidoglycan. Domain architectures of the primary enzymes involved in the eukaryotic protein methylation system indicate key features relating to interactions with each other and other modifications in chromatin, such as acetylation. They also emphasize the profound functional distinction between the role of demethylation and deacetylation in regulation of chromatin dynamics.

The long arm of long noncoding RNAs: roles as sensors regulating gene transcriptional programs

A major surprise arising from genome-wide analyses has been the observation that the majority of the genome is transcribed, generating noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). It is still an open question whether some or all of these ncRNAs constitute functional networks regulating gene transcriptional programs. However, in light of recent discoveries and given the diversity and flexibility of long ncRNAs and their abilities to nucleate molecular complexes and to form spatially compact arrays of complexes, it becomes likely that many or most ncRNAs act as sensors and integrators of a wide variety of regulated transcriptional responses and probably epigenetic events. Because many RNA-binding proteins, on binding RNAs, show distinct allosteric conformational alterations, we suggest that a ncRNA/RNA-binding protein-based strategy, perhaps in concert with several other mechanistic strategies, serves to integrate transcriptional, as well as RNA processing, regulatory programs.

Interpretation of developmental signaling at chromatin: the Polycomb perspective

The Polycomb group (PcG) system represses the transcription of important developmental regulators and perpetuates this repression across multiple cell divisions. Inputs from outside the cell can influence PcG function by recruiting additional chromatin factors to PcG-regulated loci or by downregulating the PcG genes themselves. These types of PcG system modulation allow context-dependent induction of genes during development, in cancer, and in response to changes in the environment. In this review, we outline instances where molecular players in this process have been recently identified, comparing and contrasting different ways in which derepression is achieved, and projecting directions for future research.

When needles look like hay: how to find tissue-specific enhancers in model organism genomes

A major prerequisite for the investigation of tissue-specific processes is the identification of cis-regulatory elements. No generally applicable technique is available to distinguish them from any other type of genomic non-coding sequence. Therefore, researchers often have to identify these elements by elaborate in vivo screens, testing individual regions until the right one is found. Here, based on many examples from the literature, we summarize how functional enhancers have been isolated from other elements in the genome and how they have been characterized in transgenic animals. Covering computational and experimental studies, we provide an overview of the global properties of cis-regulatory elements, like their specific interactions with promoters and target gene distances. We describe conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) and their internal structure, nucleotide composition, binding site clustering and overlap, with a special focus on developmental enhancers. Conflicting data and unresolved questions on the nature of these elements are highlighted. Our comprehensive overview of the experimental shortcuts that have been found in the different model organism communities and the new field of high-throughput assays should help during the preparation phase of a screen for enhancers. The review is accompanied by a list of general guidelines for such a project.

Chromosomal organization at the level of gene complexes

Metazoan genomes primarily consist of non-coding DNA in comparison to coding regions. Non-coding fraction of the genome contains cis-regulatory elements, which ensure that the genetic code is read properly at the right time and space during development. Regulatory elements and their target genes define functional landscapes within the genome, and some developmentally important genes evolve by keeping the genes involved in specification of common organs/tissues in clusters and are termed gene complex. The clustering of genes involved in a common function may help in robust spatio-temporal gene expression. Gene complexes are often found to be evolutionarily conserved, and the classic example is the hox complex. The evolutionary constraints seen among gene complexes provide an ideal model system to understand cis and trans-regulation of gene function. This review will discuss the various characteristics of gene regulatory modules found within gene complexes and how they can be characterized.

Enrichment of mRNA-like noncoding RNAs in the divergence of Drosophila males

With the advent of transcriptome data, it has become clear that mRNA-like noncoding RNAs (mlncRNAs) are widespread in eukaryotes. Although their functions are poorly understood, these transcripts may play an important role in development and could thus be involved in determining developmental complexity and phenotypic diversification. However, few studies have assessed their potential roles in the divergence of closely related species. Here, we identify and study patterns of sequence and expression divergence in ten novel candidate mlncRNAs from Drosophila pseudoobscura and its close relative D. persimilis. The candidate mlncRNAs were identified by randomly sequencing a group of 734 cDNA clones from a microarray that showed either no difference in expression (187 clones) or differential expression (547 clones) in comparisons between D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis and between these two species and their F(1) hybrids. Candidate mlncRNAs are overrepresented among differentially expressed transcripts between males of D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis, and although they have high sequence conservation between these two species, seven of them have no putative homologs in any of the other ten Drosophila species whose genomes have been sequenced. Expression of eight of the ten candidate mlncRNAs was detected either in whole bodies (adults) or testes using a custom-designed oligonucleotide microarray. Three of the ten candidate mlncRNAs are highly expressed (in the top 4% of the male transcriptome), differentially expressed between species, and show extreme levels of sex-bias, with one transcript having the highest level of male bias in the whole transcriptome. Proteomic data from testes show no traces of any predicted peptides from the candidate mlncRNAs. Our results suggest that these mlncRNAs may be important in male-specific processes related to sexual dimorphism and species divergence in this species group.

Stable transmission of reversible modifications: maintenance of epigenetic information through the cell cycle

Even though every cell in a multicellular organism contains the same genes, the differing spatiotemporal expression of these genes determines the eventual phenotype of a cell. This means that each cell type contains a specific epigenetic program that needs to be replicated through cell divisions, along with the genome, in order to maintain cell identity. The stable inheritance of these programs throughout the cell cycle relies on several epigenetic mechanisms. In this review, DNA methylation and histone methylation by specific histone lysine methyltransferases (KMT) and the Polycomb/Trithorax proteins are considered as the primary mediators of epigenetic inheritance. In addition, non-coding RNAs and nuclear organization are implicated in the stable transfer of epigenetic information. Although most epigenetic modifications are reversible in nature, they can be stably maintained by self-recruitment of modifying protein complexes or maintenance of these complexes or structures through the cell cycle.

Long non-coding RNAs: Guardians of development

Two decades ago, the existence of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) was discovered. In the following genomics era more transcribed non-coding genomic regions were identified. These were initially regarded as transcriptional noise and did not receive a lot of attention. Emerging data on several of these long non-coding transcripts have refuted this hypothesis by demonstrating that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are important for regulating transcription and cell signaling. A special subset of the lncRNAs affecting gene transcription appears to orchestrate major developmental programs. Here, we discuss the mechanisms by which lncRNAs regulate transcription, and review the evidence that links this class of lncRNAs to a role in development.

Regulation of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 during early porcine embryonic development

The epigenetic marks H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 are important repressive and permissive histone modifications, respectively, which are involved in gene regulation such as Hox gene expression during embryonic development. In this study, we investigated the global levels of these two histone modifications. We also investigated the expression of H3K27me3's methyltransferase (EZH2), EZH2 co-factors (EED and SUZ12) and demethylases (JMJD3 and UTX), as well as H3K4me3's methylases (ASH1L and MLL1) and demethylase (RBP2) in porcine pre-implantation embryos. In addition, the expression of Hox genes, HOXA2, HOXA3, HOXA7, HOXA10, HOXB4, HOXB7, HOXC8, HOXD8, and HOXD10 was investigated. We found that global levels of H3K27me3 decreased from the 1- to the 4-cell stage, corresponding to the time of major embryonic genome activation. Subsequently, the levels increased in hatched blastocysts, particularly in the trophectoderm. The expression levels of EZH2, EED, SUZ12, JMJD3, and UTX correlated well with these findings. The global levels of H3K4me3 decreased from the 1-cell to the morula stage and increased in hatched blastocysts, especially in trophectoderm. A peak in expression of ASH1L was seen at the 4-cell stage, but overall, expression of ASH1L, MLL1, and RBP2 correlated poorly with H3K4me3. HOXA3, A7, and B4 were expressed in 4-cell embryos, and HOXA7, A10, B4, and D8 were expressed in hatched blastocysts, and did not correlate well to global methylation of H3K27me3 or H3K4me3. Thus, H3K4me3 may play a role in early porcine embryonic genome activation, whereas, H3K27me3 may be involved in initial cell lineage segregation in the blastocyst.

CtBP levels control intergenic transcripts, PHO/YY1 DNA binding, and PcG recruitment to DNA

Carboxy-terminal binding protein (CtBP) is a well-known corepressor of several DNA binding transcription factors in Drosophila as well as in mammals. CtBP is implicated in Polycomb Group (PcG) complex-mediated transcriptional repression because it can bind to some PcG proteins, and mutation of the ctbp gene in flies results in lost PcG protein recruitment to Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and lost PcG repression. However, the mechanism of reduced PcG DNA binding in CtBP mutant backgrounds is unknown. We show here that in a Drosophila CtBP mutant background, intergenic transcripts are induced across several PRE sequences and this corresponds to reduced DNA binding by PcG proteins Pleiohomeotic (PHO) and Polycomb (Pc), and reduced trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27, a hallmark of PcG repression. Restoration of CtBP levels by expression of a CtBP transgene results in repression of intergenic transcripts, restored PcG binding, and elevated trimethylation of H3 on lysine 27. Our results support a model in which CtBP regulates expression of intergenic transcripts that controls DNA binding by PcG proteins and subsequent histone modifications and transcriptional activity.

Long noncoding RNAs in mammalian cells: what, where, and why?

Not all long, polyadenylated cellular RNAs encode polypeptides. In recent years, it has become apparent that a number of organisms express abundant amounts of transcripts that lack open reading frames or that are retained in the nucleus. Rather than accumulating silently in the cell, we now know that many of these long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in nuclear architecture or in the regulation of gene expression. Here, we discuss some recent progress in our understanding of the functions of a number of important lncRNAs in mammalian cells.

Role for the MOV10 RNA helicase in polycomb-mediated repression of the INK4a tumor suppressor

Several lines of evidence point to a role for noncoding RNA in transcriptional repression by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins, but the precise mechanism remains unclear. Here we show that human MOV10, a putative RNA helicase previously implicated in post-transcriptional gene silencing, co-purifies and interacts with components of Polycomb-repressive complex 1 (PRC1) from human cells. Endogenous human MOV10 is mostly nuclear, and a proportion associates with chromatin in an RNA-dependent manner. Small hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of MOV10 in human fibroblasts leads to the upregulation of the INK4a tumor suppressor, a known target of PcG-mediated repression, accompanied by the dissociation of PRC1 proteins from the locus and a reduction in trimethylation of histone H3 on Lys27 (H3K27me3). As well as prompting reassessment of MOV10's role in other settings, our findings suggest that it is directly involved in transcriptional silencing by PcG complexes.

Epigenetics and gene expression

Transcription, translation and subsequent protein modification represent the transfer of genetic information from the archival copy of DNA to the short-lived messenger RNA, usually with subsequent production of protein. Although all cells in an organism contain essentially the same DNA, cell types and functions differ because of qualitative and quantitative differences in their gene expression. Thus, control of gene expression is at the heart of differentiation and development. Epigenetic processes, including DNA methylation, histone modification and various RNA-mediated processes, are thought to influence gene expression chiefly at the level of transcription; however, other steps in the process (for example, translation) may also be regulated epigenetically. The following paper will outline the role epigenetics is believed to have in influencing gene expression.

RNA memory model: a RNA-mediated transcriptional activation mechanism involved in cell identity

I propose a new model, called the "RNA memory" model, for the possible role of RNAs in the maintenance and establishment of cell identity. This is cytoplasmic memory obtained by the transmission of mother noncoding (nc) RNAs to daughter cells. These RNAs are able to activate transcription via sequence homology in daughter cells. Regulation of RNA memory is strictly linked to the regulation of ncRNAs with repressive features, such as the RNAs involved in RNA interference (RNAi). Misregulation of this system could lead to misidentity, and thus it could be involved in cancer transformation, progression of viral or genetic diseases, and progression of senescence.

RNA traffic control of chromatin complexes

It is widely accepted that the genome is regulated by histone modifications that induce epigenetic changes on the genome. However, it is still not understood how ubiquitously expressed chromatin modifying complexes are 'guided' to specific genomic sites to induce intricate patterns of epigenetic modifications. Previously believed to represent 'genome junk', it is now becoming increasingly clear that large non-coding RNAs associate with chromatin modifying complexes. Here we explore an intriguing hypothesis that large non-coding RNA molecules might represent a molecular trafficking system that modulates chromatin modifying complexes to establish specific epigenetic landscapes.

Interaction between Ataxin-2 Binding Protein 1 and Cubitus-interruptus during wing development in Drosophila

Animal growth and development is dependent on reiterative use of key signaling pathways such as Hedgehog (Hh) pathway. It is widely believed that Cubitus-interruptus (Ci) mediates all functions of Hh pathway. Here we report that CG32062, the Drosophila homologue of Ataxin-2 Binding Protein 1 (dA2BP1), functions as a cofactor of Ci to specify intervein region between L3 and L4 veins of the adult wing. Specifically, Ci-mediated transactivation of knot/collier (kn) in this region of the developing wing imaginal disc is dependent on dA2BP1 function. Protein interaction studies and chromatin-immunoprecipiation experiments suggest that Ci helps dA2BP1 to bind kn promoter, which in turn may help Ci to activate kn expression. These results suggest a mechanism by which Ci may activate targets such as kn, which do not have classical Ci/Gli-binding sites.

Shaping the oligodendrocyte identity by epigenetic control

Cell diversity in the central nervous system (CNS) is achieved by a highly regulated process of differentiation from multipotential neural stem cells. The spatial specificity and timing control of neural differentiation is achieved by the interplay between various genetic and epigenetic regulators. Oligodendrocytes, the myelinating cell in the CNS, play an important role in brain development and neuronal function. At present, multiple signaling pathways have been implicated in regulating in oligodendrocyte differentiation, however, the integration of these pathways with transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory networks are not fully understood. This review will focus on exploiting epigenetic mechanisms underlying oligodendrocyte development including chromatin remodeling by histone deacetylases and gene silencing by non-coding RNAs (e.g., microRNA), and attempts to summarize the recent advance as to the genetic and epigenetic interaction in controlling oligodendroglial differentiation and myelination.

Polycomb group protein gene silencing, non-coding RNA, stem cells, and cancer

Epigenetic programming is an important facet of biology, controlling gene expression patterns and the choice between developmental pathways. The Polycomb group proteins (PcGs) silence gene expression, allowing cells to both acquire and maintain identity. PcG silencing is important for stemness, X chromosome inactivation (XCI), genomic imprinting, and the abnormally silenced genes in cancers. Stem and cancer cells commonly share gene expression patterns, regulatory mechanisms, and signalling pathways. Many microRNA species have oncogenic or tumor suppressor activity, and disruptions in these networks are common in cancer; however, long non-coding (nc)RNA species are also important. Many of these directly guide PcG deposition and gene silencing at the HOX locus, during XCI, and in examples of genomic imprinting. Since inappropriate HOX expression and loss of genomic imprinting are hallmarks of cancer, disruption of long ncRNA-mediated PcG silencing likely has a role in oncogenesis. Aberrant silencing of coding and non-coding loci is critical for both the genesis and progression of cancers. In addition, PcGs are commonly abnormally overexpressed years prior to cancer pathology, making early PcG targeted therapy an option to reverse tumor formation, someday replacing the blunt instrument of eradication in the cancer therapy arsenal.

Regulatory long non-coding RNAs and neuronal disorders

Increasing evidence suggests that GABA neuropathies play a major role in a variety of neuronal disorders. In addition, the role of non-coding RNAs in regulating a wide range of cellular processes is an intense area of investigation. This commentary discusses the intersection of these two fields, a corollary to the finding that adult hippocampal GABAergic interneuron development is controlled by an embryonic non-coding RNA during development.

Cis-regulation in the Drosophila Bithorax Complex

The discovery of the first homeotic mutation by Calvin Bridges in 1915 profoundly influenced the way we think about developmental processes. Although many mutations modify or deform morphological structures, homeotic mutations cause a spectacular phenotype in which a morphological structure develops like a copy of a structure that is normally found elsewhere on an organism's body plan. This is best illustrated in Drosophila where homeotic mutations were first discovered. For example, Antennapedia mutants have legs developing on their head instead of antennae. Because a mutation in a single gene creates such complete structures, homeotic genes were proposed to be key "selector genes" regulating the initiation of a developmental program. According to this model, once a specific developmental program is initiated (i.e., antenna or leg), it can be executed by downstream "realizator genes" independent of its location along the body axis. Consistent with this idea, homeotic genes have been shown to encode transcription factor proteins that control the activity of the many downstream targets to "realize" a developmental program. Here, we will review the first and perhaps, best characterized homeotic complex, the Bithorax Complex (BX-C).

Polycomb group-mediated gene silencing mechanisms: stability versus flexibility

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are highly conserved chromatin factors that repress transcription of particular target genes in animals and plants. PcG proteins form multimeric complexes that act on their target genes through the regulation of post-translational histone modifications, the modulation of chromatin structure and chromosome organization. PcG proteins have long been considered as a cellular memory system that stably locks regulatory chromatin states for the whole lifespan of the organism. However, recent work on the genome-wide distribution of PcG components and their associated chromatin marks in vertebrate cells and Drosophila have challenged this view, revealing that PcG proteins confer dynamic transcriptional control of key developmental genes during cell differentiation and development.

A global view of genomic information--moving beyond the gene and the master regulator

The current view of gene regulation in complex organisms holds that gene expression is largely controlled by the combinatoric actions of transcription factors and other regulatory proteins, some of which powerfully influence cell type. Recent large-scale studies have confirmed that cellular differentiation involves many different regulatory factors. However, other studies indicate that the genome is pervasively transcribed to produce a variety of short and long non-protein-coding RNAs, including those derived from retrotransposed sequences, which also play important roles in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. The evidence suggests that ontogenesis requires interplay between state-specific regulatory proteins, multitasked effector complexes and target-specific RNAs that recruit these complexes to their sites of action. Moreover, the semi-continuous nature of the transcriptome prompts the reassessment of 'genes' as discrete entities and indicates that the mammalian genome might be more accurately viewed as islands of protein-coding information in a sea of cis- and trans-acting regulatory sequences.

A systematic approach to identify functional motifs within vertebrate developmental enhancers

Uncovering the cis-regulatory logic of developmental enhancers is critical to understanding the role of non-coding DNA in development. However, it is cumbersome to identify functional motifs within enhancers, and thus few vertebrate enhancers have their core functional motifs revealed. Here we report a combined experimental and computational approach for discovering regulatory motifs in developmental enhancers. Making use of the zebrafish gene expression database, we computationally identified conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) likely to have a desired tissue-specificity based on the expression of nearby genes. Through a high throughput and robust enhancer assay, we tested the activity of approximately 100 such CNEs and efficiently uncovered developmental enhancers with desired spatial and temporal expression patterns in the zebrafish brain. Application of de novo motif prediction algorithms on a group of forebrain enhancers identified five top-ranked motifs, all of which were experimentally validated as critical for forebrain enhancer activity. These results demonstrate a systematic approach to discover important regulatory motifs in vertebrate developmental enhancers. Moreover, this dataset provides a useful resource for further dissection of vertebrate brain development and function.