Role of the histone amino termini in facilitated binding of a transcription factor, GAL4-AH, to nucleosome cores. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:970-981. [PMID: 8289837 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.2.970]

Transcriptional activators direct histone acetyltransferase complexes to nucleosomes

Transcriptional co-activators were originally identified as proteins that act as intermediaries between upstream activators and the basal transcription machinery. The discovery that co-activators such as Tetrahymena and yeast Gcn5, as well as human p300/CBP, pCAF, Src-1, ACTR and TAFII250, can acetylate histones suggests that activators may be involved in targeting acetylation activity to promoters. Several histone deacetylases have been linked to transcriptional co-repressor proteins, suggesting that the action of both acetylases and deacetylases is important in the regulation of many genes. Here we demonstrate the binding of two native yeast histone acetyltransferase (HAT) complexes to the herpesvirus VP16 activation domain and the yeast transcriptional activator Gcn4, and show that it is their interaction with the VP16 activation domain that targets Gal4-VP16-bound nucleosomes for acetylation. We find that Gal4-VP16-driven transcription from chromatin templates is stimulated by both HAT complexes in an acetyl CoA-dependent reaction. Our results demonstrate the targeting of native HAT complexes by a transcription-activation domain to nucleosomes in order to activate transcription.

Perturbation of nucleosome structure by the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1

The ability of transcription factors to gain access to their sites in chromatin requires the disruption or displacement of nucleosomes covering the promoter, signalled by the generation of a nuclease hypersensitive site. We characterise here the alterations in nucleosome structure caused by binding of the erythroid factor GATA-1 to a nucleosome carrying GATA-1 sites. DNase I and micrococcal nuclease probes show that GATA-1 binding causes extensive, cooperative breakage of the histone/DNA contacts to generate a complex very similar to that formed by the factor with free DNA. The only region which differs is confined to about 50 bp surrounding the nucleosome dyad axis which appears to be the domain of residual contact between the DNA and histone octamer. Despite considerable breakage of the histone/DNA contacts, the complex is completely stable in solution, and disruption of the nucleosome is entirely reversible: it is regenerated quantitatively upon removal of the transcription factor. Moreover, the histone 2A/2B component of the octamer does not exchange to external competitor. We suggest that formation of this complex may be a step in the generation of a fully hypersensitive site in vivo over regulatory elements containing GATA family binding sites.

Binding of retinoic acid receptor heterodimers to DNA. A role for histones NH2 termini

The retinoic acid signaling pathway is controlled essentially through two types of nuclear receptors, RARs and RXRs. Ligand dependent activation or repression of retinoid-regulated genes is dependent on the binding of retinoic acid receptor (RAR)/9-cis-retinoic acid receptor (RXR) heterodimers to retinoic acid response element (RARE). Although unliganded RXR/RAR heterodimers bind constitutively to DNA in vitro, a clear in vivo ligand-dependent occupancy of the RARE present in the RARbeta2 gene promoter has been reported (Dey, A., Minucci, S., and Ozato, K. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8191-8201). Nucleosomes are viewed as general repressors of the transcriptional machinery, in part by preventing the access of transcription factors to DNA. The ability of hRXRalpha/hRARalpha heterodimers to bind to a nucleosomal template in vitro has therefore been examined. The assembly of a fragment from the RARbeta2 gene promoter, which contains a canonical DR5 RARE, into a nucleosome core prevented hRXRalpha/hRARalpha binding to this DNA, in conditions where a strong interaction is observed with a linear DNA template. However, histone tails removal by limited proteolysis and histone hyperacetylation yielded nucleosomal RAREs able to bind to hRXRalpha/hRARalpha heterodimers. These data establish therefore the role of histones NH2 termini as a major impediment to retinoid receptors access to DNA, and identify histone hyperacetylation as a potential physiological regulator of retinoid-induced transcription.

High resolution microanalysis and three-dimensional nucleosome structure associated with transcribing chromatin

The nucleosome is the ubiquitous and fundamental DNA-protein complex of the eukaryotic chromosome, participating in the packaging of DNA and in the regulation of gene expression. Biophysical studies have implicated changes in nucleosome structure from chromatin that is quiescent to active in transcription. Since DNA within the nucleosome contains a high concentration of phosphorus whereas histone proteins do not, the nucleosome structure is amenable to microanalytical electron energy loss mapping of phosphorus to delineate the DNA within the protein-nucleic acid particle. Nucleosomes associated with transcriptionally active genes were separated from nucleosomes associated with quiescent genes using mercury-affinity chromatography. The three-dimensional image reconstruction methods for the total nucleosome structure and for the 3D DNA-phosphorus distribution combined quaternion-assisted angular reconstitution of sets of single particles at random orientations and electron spectroscopic imaging. The structure of the active nucleosome has the conformation of an open clam-shell, C- or U-shaped in one view, elongated in another, and exhibits a protein asymmetry. A three-dimensional phosphorus map reveals a conformational change in nucleosomal DNA compared to DNA in the canonical nucleosome structure. It indicates an altered superhelicity and is consistent with unfolding of the particle. The results address conformational changes of the nucleosome and provide a direct structural linkage to biochemical and physiological changes which parallel gene expression.

Histone deacetylases, acetoin utilization proteins and acetylpolyamine amidohydrolases are members of an ancient protein superfamily

Searches of several sequence databases reveal that human HD1, yeast HDA1, yeast RPD3 and other eukaryotic histone deacetylases share nine motifs with archaeal and eubacterial enzymes, including acetoin utilization protein (acuC) and acetylpolyamine amidohydrolase. Histone deacetylase and acetylpolyamine amidohydrolase also share profound functional similarities in that both: (i) recognize an acetylated aminoalkyl group; (ii) catalyze the removal of the acetyl group by cleaving an amide bond; (iii) increase the positive charge of the substrate. Stabilization of nucleosomal DNA-histone interaction brought about by the change in charge has been implicated as the underlying cause for histone deacetylase-mediated transcriptional repression. We speculate that the eukaryotic histone deacetylases originated from a prokaryotic enzyme similar to the acetylpolyamine amidohydrolases that relied on reversible acetylation and deacetylation of the aminoalkyl group of a DNA binding molecule to achieve a gene regulatory effect.

Histones as a target for influenza virus matrix protein M1

Matrix protein M1 purified from influenza A and B viruses has been analyzed for its ability to specifically interact with cellular proteins by immune coprecipitation and by an in vitro binding assay on nitrocellulose on PVDF membranes. When M1 was mixed with lysates of uninfected cells there was selective binding of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Week binding of H1 was also observed. The binding specificity of M1 was confirmed by using purified histones. The M1-histone complexes were dependent on pH and ionic strength, indicating electrostatic interactions. Chemical cleavage of M1 by formic acid into an N-terminal 9-kDa fragment and a C-terminal 18-kDa fragment did not abolish interaction with histones. However, after treatment with 1 M sodium chloride cleaved M1 no longer bound to histones, whereas uncleaved M1 showed an increased binding activity after salt treatment. These findings suggest that both N- and C-terminal domains of M1 are involved in histone binding and that conformation of M is an important factor in this interaction. The data support the notion that there is specific interaction of M1 with nucleosomes during the nuclear phase of influenza virus replication.

Cell growth inhibition by the Mad/Max complex through recruitment of histone deacetylase activity

BACKGROUND

The organization of chromatin is crucial for the regulation of gene expression. In particular, both the positioning and properties of nucleosomes influence promoter-specific transcription. The acetylation of core histones has been suggested to alter the properties of nucleosomes and affect the access of DNA-binding transcriptional regulators to promoters. A recently identified mammalian histone deacetylase (HD1) shows homology to the yeast Rpd3 protein, which together with Sin3 affects the transcription of several genes. Mammalian Sin3 proteins interact with the Mad components of the Myc/Max/Mad network of cell growth regulators. Mad/Max complexes may recruit mammalian Rpd3-like enzymes, therefore, directing histone deacetylase activity to promoters and negatively regulating cell growth.

RESULTS

We report the identification of a tetrameric complex composed of Max, Mad1, Sin3B and HD1. This complex has histone deacetylase activity which can be blocked by the histone deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A and sodium butyrate. The inhibition of cell growth by Mad1 is enhanced by Sin3B and HD1, as measured by colony formation assays. Furthermore, a Mad1-induced block of S-phase progression can be overcome by trichostatin A, as shown in microinjection experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

The recruitment of a histone deacetylase by sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins provides a mechanism by which the state of acetylation of histones in nucleosomes and hence the activity of specific promoters can be influenced. The finding that Mad/Max complexes interact with Sin3 and HD1 in vivo suggests a model for the role of Mad proteins in antagonizing the function of Myc proteins.

SWI/SNF stimulates the formation of disparate activator-nucleosome complexes but is partially redundant with cooperative binding

To investigate the potential mechanisms by which the SWI/SNF complex differentially regulates different genes we have tested whether transcription factors with diverse DNA binding domains were able to exploit nucleosome disruption by SWI/SNF. In addition to GAL4-VP16, the SWI/SNF complex stimulated nucleosome binding by the Zn2+ fingers of Sp1, the basic helix-loop-helix domain of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappaB. In each case SWI/SNF action resulted in the formation of a stable factor-nucleosome complex that persisted after detachment of SWI/SNF from the nucleosome. Thus, stimulation of factor binding by SWI/SNF appears to be universal. The degree of SWI/SNF stimulation of nucleosome binding by a factor appears to be inversely related to the extent that binding is inhibited by the histone octamer. Cooperative binding of 5 GAL4-VP16 dimers to a 5-site nucleosome enhanced GAL4 binding relative to a single-site nucleosome, but this also reduced the degree of stimulation by SWI/SNF. The SWI/SNF complex increased the affinity of 5 GAL4-VP16 dimers for nucleosomes equal to that of DNA but no further. Similarly, multimerized NF-kappaB sites enhanced nucleosome binding by NF-kappaB and reduced the stimulatory effect of SWI/SNF. Thus, cooperative binding of factors to nucleosomes is partially redundant with the function of the SWI/SNF complex.

The role of chromatin in transcriptional regulation

Transcriptional activation is mediated by the facilitated binding of the basal transcription complex to the transcription start site of a promoter. The activation procedure involves protein-protein interactions between specific transcription factors and members of the basal transcription complex. However, since eukaryotic DNA is packaged with histones into nucleosomes the accessibility of the transcription factors is limited. In order to activate transcription, some of the specific transcription factors must have the capacity to bind to their binding sites when organized into nucleosomes. As a next step, the chromatin structure of the promoter needs to be decondensed in order to facilitate the binding of the basal transcription machinery. Recent data have addressed these issues and both binding of transcription factors to their chromatin binding site as well as transcription factor-induced chromatin remodelling have been demonstrated. In addition, factors that are candidates to mediate the chromatin remodelling have recently been identified and characterized. The ability of a transcription factor to recognize its cognate element in a nucleosome is an inheret property that differs among different transcription factors. The implications of the rotational and translational positioning of the DNA within a nucleosome on the accessibility of a transcription factor is described in this review. In addition, nucleosome rearrangement and juxtaposing in the context of transcriptional activation is also discussed.

H1-mediated repression of transcription factor binding to a stably positioned nucleosome

Previously, we reported that histone H1 binding to nucleosome cores results in the repression of binding of the basic helix-loop-helix upstream stimulatory factor (USF) (Juan, L.-J., Utley, R. T., Adams, C. C., Vettese-Dadey, M., and Workman, J. L. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 6031-6040). We have tested whether this inhibition resulted from H1-mediated changes in nucleosome positioning (Ura, K., Hayes, J. J., and Wolffe, A. P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3752-3765) forcing the USF recognition sequence into less accessible locations within the nucleosome. Nucleosome boundaries were determined by assays combining micrococcal nuclease and restriction endonuclease digestion. A unique pair of boundaries were observed, indicating a single nucleosome translational position. This nucleosome position did not change on H1 or USF binding. Thus, H1 repression of USF binding was independent of nucleosome mobility, indicating an alternative mechanism of H1 repression. H1 repressed USF binding at a site 35 base pairs into the nucleosome core more effectively than at a site near the "linker" DNA, suggesting that inhibition by H1 was not simply due to steric occlusion. Instead, these data are consistent with a model by which H1 binding reduces transient dynamic exposure of the DNA from the histone octamer surface (Polach, K. L., and Widom, J. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 254, 130-149).

The TAF(II)250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity

The transcription initiation factor TFIID is a multimeric protein complex composed of TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and many TBP-associated factors (TAF(II)s). TAF(II)s are important cofactors that mediate activated transcription by providing interaction sites for distinct activators. Here, we present evidence that human TAF(II)250 and its homologs in Drosophila and yeast have histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity in vitro. HAT activity maps to the central, most conserved portion of dTAF(II)230 and yTAF(II)130. The HAT activity of dTAF(II)230 resembles that of yeast and human GCN5 in that it is specific for histones H3 and H4 in vitro. Our findings suggest that targeted histone acetylation at specific promoters by TAF(II)250 may be involved in mechanisms by which TFIID gains access to transcriptionally repressed chromatin.

Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells

Current methods for analysis of chromatin architecture are invasive, utilizing chemicals or nucleases that damage DNA, making detection of labile constituents and conclusions about true in vivo structure problematic. We describe a sensitive assay of chromatin structure which is performed in intact, living yeast. The approach utilizes expression of SssI DNA methyltransferase (MTase) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to provide an order-of-magnitude increase in resolution over previously introduced MTases. Combining this resolution increase with the novel application of a PCR-based, positive chemical display of modified cytosines provides a significant advance in the direct study of DNA-protein interactions in growing cells that enables quantitative footprinting. The validity and efficacy of the strategy are demonstrated in mini-chromosomes, where positioned nucleosomes and a labile, operator-bound repressor are detected. Also, using a heterologous system to study gene activation, we show that in vivo hormone occupancy of the estrogen receptor is required for maximal site-specific DNA binding, whereas, at very high receptor-expression levels, hormone-independent partial occupancy of an estrogen-responsive element was observed. Receptor binding to a palindromic estrogen-responsive element leads to a footprint with strand-specific asymmetry, which is explicable by known structural information.

Remodeling chromatin structures for transcription: what happens to the histones?

Activation of gene transcription in vivo is accompanied by an alteration of chromatin structure. The specific binding of transcriptional activators disrupts nucleosomal arrays, suggesting that the primary steps leading to transcriptional initiation involve interactions between activators and chromatin. The affinity of transcription factors for nucleosomal DNA is determined by the location of recognition sequences within nucleosomes, and by the cooperative interactions of multiple proteins targeting binding sites contained within the same nucleosomes. In addition, two distinct types of enzymatic complexes facilitate binding of transcription factors to nucleosomal DNA. These include type A histone acetyltransferases (e.g. GCN5/ADA transcriptional adaptor complex) and ATP-driven molecular machines that disrupt histone-DNA interactions (e.g. SWI/SNF and NURF complexes). These observations raise the important question of what happens to the histones during chromatin remodeling. We discuss evidence supporting the retention of histones at transcription factor-bound sequences as well as two alternative pathways of histone loss from gene control elements upon transcription factor binding: histone octamer sliding and histone dissociation.

Binding of the wheat basic leucine zipper protein EmBP-1 to nucleosomal binding sites is modulated by nucleosome positioning

To investigate interactions of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor EmBP-1 with its recognition sites in nucleosomal DNA, we reconstituted an abscisic acid response element and a high-affinity binding site for EmBP-1 into human and wheat nucleosome cores in vitro. DNA binding studies demonstrated that nucleosomal elements can be bound by EmBP-1 at reduced affinities relative to naked DNA. EmBP-1 affinity was lowest when the recognition sites were positioned near the center of the nucleosome. Binding was achieved with a truncated DNA binding domain; however, binding of full-length EmBP-1 caused additional strong DNase I hypersensitivity flanking the binding sites. Similar results were observed with nucleosomes reconstituted with either human or wheat histones, demonstrating a conserved mechanism of transcription factor-nucleosome interactions. We conclude that positioning of recognition sequences on a nucleosome may play an important role in regulating interactions of EmBP-1 with its target sites in plant cells.

Acetylation of histone H4 plays a primary role in enhancing transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA in vitro

Core histones isolated from normal and butyrate-treated HeLa cells have been reconstituted into nucleosome cores in order to analyze the role of histone acetylation in enhancing transcription factor binding to recognition sites in nucleosomal DNA. Moderate stimulation of nucleosome binding was observed for the basic helix-loop-helix factor USF and the Zn cluster DNA binding domain factor GAL4-AH using heterogeneously acetylated histones. However, by coupling novel immunoblotting techniques to a gel retardation assay, we observed that nucleosome cores containing the most highly acetylated forms of histone H4 have the highest affinity for these two transcription factors. Western analysis of gel-purified USF-nucleosome and GAL4-AH-nucleosome complexes demonstrated the predominant presence of acetylated histone H4 relative to acetylated histone H3. Immunoprecipitation of USF-nucleosome complexes with anti-USF antibodies also demonstrated that these complexes were enriched preferentially in acetylated histone H4. These data show that USF and GAL4-AH preferentially interact with nucleosome cores containing highly acetylated histone H4. Acetylation of histone H4 thus appears to play a primary role in the structural changes that mediate enhanced binding of transcription factors to their recognition sites within nucleosomes.

Special HATs for special occasions: linking histone acetylation to chromatin assembly and gene activation

Post-translational acetylation of the core histone amino-terminal tails has long been associated with both chromatin assembly and the regulation of gene expression. The recent identification and cloning of histone acetyltransferase genes represents a significant breakthrough in our understanding of how specific acetylation states are established. Ongoing characterization of these enzymes and their molecular cohorts supports a direct role for acetylation in a signaling pathway that modulates chromatin structure to create new patterns of transcription.

Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes

During the past year, the characterization of mechanisms and factors capable of disrupting nucleosomes during transcriptional activation has been a recurrent theme in studies which address the contribution of nucleosome structure to gene regulation. In vivo studies using yeast and Drosophila together with biochemical purification schemes using nucleosome perturbation assays have provided evidence for the existence of multiprotein complexes that are able to alleviate nucleosome repression. At the same time, new insights into the mechanism of heterochromatin formation have been gained, which have direct links to nucleosome structure.

The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively

The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid, encoded by the maternal gene bicoid, is required for the development of the anterior structures in the embryo. Bicoid, a transcriptional activator containing a homeodomain, is distributed in an anterior-to-posterior gradient in the embryo. In response to this gradient, the zygotic gene hunchback is expressed uniformly in the anterior half of the embryo in a nearly all-or-none manner. In this report we demonstrate that a recombinant Bicoid protein binds cooperatively to its sites within a hunchback enhancer element. A less than 4-fold increase in Bicoid concentration is sufficient to achieve an unbound/bound transition in DNA binding. Using various biochemical and genetic methods we further demonstrate that Bicoid molecules can interact with each other. Our results are consistent with previous studies performed in the embryo, and they suggest that one mechanism to achieve a sharp on/off switch of gene expression in response to a morphogenetic gradient is cooperative DNA binding facilitated by protein-protein interaction.

Transcriptional regulation by steroid hormones

Steroid hormones influence the transcription of a large number of genes by virtue of their interaction with intracellular receptors, which are modular proteins composed of a ligand binding domain, a DNA binding domain, and several transactivation functions distributed along the molecule. The DNA binding domain is organized around two zinc ions and allows the receptors to bind as homodimers to palindromic DNA sequences, the hormones responsive elements (HRE), is such a way that each homodimer contacts one half of the palindrome. Since the two halves are separated by three base pairs, the two homodimers contact the same face of the double helix. Before hormone binding, the receptors are part of a complex with multiple chaperones which maintain the receptor in its steroid binding conformation. Following hormone binding, the complex dissociates and the receptors bind to HREs in chromatin. Regulation of gene expression by hormones involves an interaction of the DNA-bound receptors with other sequence-specific transcription factors and with the general transcription factors, which is partly mediated by co-activators and co-repressors. The specific array of cis regulatory elements in a particular promoter/enhancer region, as well as the organization of the DNA sequences in nucleosomes, specifies the network of receptor interactions. Depending on the nature of these interactions, the final outcome can be induction or repression of transcription. The various levels at which these interactions are modulated are discussed using as an example the promoter of the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus and its organization in chromatin.

Chromatin structure of the MMTV promoter and its changes during hormonal induction

1. The packaging of nuclear DNA in chromatin determines the conversion of the genetic information into a defined phenotype by influencing the availability of DNA sequences for interactions with regulatory proteins and transcription factors. 2. We have studied the influence of the first level of chromatin organization, the nucleosome, on the activity of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. The MMTV promoter is strongly transcribed in response to steroid hormones but is virtually silent in the absence of hormonal stimuli. Full hormonal induction requires binding of the hormone receptors to four hormone-responsive elements (HREs), as well as binding of nuclear factor I (NFI) and the octamer transcription factor 1 (OTF-1 or Oct-1) to sites located between the HREs and the TATA box. A full loading with transcription factors cannot be achieved on free DNA due to steric hindrance between hormone receptor and NFI and between NFI and OTF-1. 3. The low basal activity of the MMTV promoter is most likely due to its organization in a positioned nucleosome. In the intact cell, as well in reconstituted chromatin, the regulatory region of the MMTV promoter is wrapped around a histone octamer in a precise rotational orientation, which permits access of the hormone receptors to only two of the four HREs, while precluding binding of NFI and OTF-1 to their respective sites. Upon hormone induction, the nucleosome is remodeled and the path of its DNA altered in a way which makes the nucleosomal dyad axis more accessible to DNase I and enables occupancy of all relevant sites: the four HREs, as well as the binding sites for NFI and OTF-1. 4. These results suggest that the nucleosomal organization of the MMTV promoter not only is responsible for the low activity prior to hormone treatment, but also may be a prerequisite for full loading with transcription factors after hormone induction. We conclude that the DNA contains topological information which modulates the expression of the genetic program.

Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation

We report the cloning of a transcription-associated histone acetyltransferase type A(HAT A). This Tetrahymena enzyme is strikingly homologous to the yeast protein Gcn5, a putative transcriptional adaptor, and we demonstrate that recombinant Gcn5p possesses HAT activity. Both the ciliate enzyme and Gcn5p contain potential active site residues found in other acetyltransferases and a highly conserved bromodomain. The presence of this domain in nuclear A-type HATs, but not in cytoplasmic B-type HATs, suggests a mechanism whereby HAT A is directed to chromatin to facilitate transcriptional activation. These findings shed light on the biochemical function of the evolutionarily conserved Gcn5p-Ada complex, directly linking histone acetylation to gene activation, and indicate that histone acetylation is a targeted phenomenon.

Interaction of steroid hormone receptors with transcription factors involves chromatin remodelling

The mechanism by which steroid hormones modulate promoter utilization is not clear. Evidence from transfection studies and cell-free assays points to an interaction of the hormone receptors with general transcription factors, as well as with sequence-specific transcription factors. Moreover co-activators or transcription intermediary factors, have been identified which could mediate some of the transcriptional effects of the hormone-receptor complex. However, in addition to this interaction of receptors with proteins directly involved in transcription, a participation of chromatin structure in gene regulation by steroid hormones is becoming increasingly evident. In the case of the MMTV promoter, the nucleosomal organization seems to be responsible for transcriptional repression prior to hormonal stimulation. This effect is due to occlusion by a nucleosome positioned on the MMTV promoter sequences in such a way that essential transcription factors cannot access their recognition sites. Following hormone induction, a remodelling of the nucleosome structure takes place which enables a whole complement of sequence specific transcription factors to assemble on the promoter. Since a complete occupancy of binding sites does not take place when the promoter is present as naked DNA, the nucleosomal organization appears to be required for the proper synergism between transcription factors following hormonal induction. According to this model, the positioning of a nucleosome sets the stage for constitutive repression and hormone induction of the MMTV promoter.

The nuclear matrix and the regulation of chromatin organization and function

Nuclear DNA is organized into loop domains, with the base of the loop being bound to the nuclear matrix. Loops with transcriptionally active and/or potentially active genes have a DNase I-sensitive chromatin structure, while repressed chromatin loops have a condensed configuration that is essentially invisible to the transcription machinery. Core histone acetylation and torsional stress appear to be responsible for the generation and/or maintenance of the open potentially active chromatin loops. The transcriptionally active region of the loop makes several dynamic attachments with the nuclear matrix and is associated with core histones that are dynamically acetylated. Histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase, which catalyze this rapid acetylation and deacetylation, are bound to the nuclear matrix. Several transcription factors are components of the nuclear matrix. Histone acetyltransferase, deacetylase, and transcription factors may contribute to the dynamic attachment of the active chromatin domains with the nuclear matrix at sites of ongoing transcription.

Disruption of reconstituted nucleosomes. The effect of particle concentration, MgCl2 and KCl concentration, the histone tails, and temperature

We find that reconstituted nucleosome cores containing specific DNA sequences dissociate on dilution. This disruption of histone-DNA contacts leading to the release of free DNA is facilitated by the presence of the core histone tails, MgCl2 (5 mM), KCl (60 mM), and temperatures above 0 degree C. Under reaction conditions that are commonly used to assess trans-acting factor access to nucleosomal DNA, histone-DNA contacts are on the threshold of instability. We demonstrate how dilution of reconstituted nucleosomes containing a TATA box can facilitate TBP access to DNA.

Transcription factor-mediated chromatin remodelling: mechanisms and models

The association of DNA with nucleosomes in chromatin severely restricts the access of the regulatory factors that bring about transcription. In vivo active promoters are characterised by altered, almost transparent chromatin structures that allow the interaction of the transcriptional machinery. Recently, enzymatic activities have been discovered that facilitate the binding of transcription factors to chromatin by modifying nucleosomal structures in a process that requires energy. The mechanisms by which chromatin is remodelled may involve nucleosome movements, their transient unfolding, their partial or even complete disassembly. The dynamic properties of chromatin that underlie these structural changes are fundamental to the process of regulated gene expression.

Histone acetylation: facts and questions

The DNA of eukaryotic cells is organized in a complex with proteins, either as interphase chromatin or mitotic chromosomes. Nucleosomes, the structural subunits of chromatin, have long been considered as static structures, incompatible with processes occurring in chromatin. During the past few years it has become evident that the histone part of the nucleosome has important regulatory functions. Some of these functions are mediated by the N-terminal core histone domains which contain sites for posttranslational modifications, among them lysine residues for reversible acetylation. Recent results indicate that acetylation and deacetylation of N-terminal lysines of nucleosomal core histones represent a means of molecular communication between chromatin and the cellular signal transduction network, resulting in heritable epigenetic information. Data on enzymes involved in acetylation and the pattern of acetylated lysine sites on chromosomes, as well as genetic data on yeast transcriptional repression, suggest that acetylation may lead to structural transitions as well as specific signalling within distinct chromatin domains.

The establishment of active promoters in chromatin

The organization of eukaryotic genomes as chromatin provides the framework within which regulated transcription occurs in the nucleus. The association of DNA with chromatin proteins required to package the genome into the nucleus is, in general, inhibitory to transcription, and therefore provides opportunities for regulated transcriptional activation. Granting access to the cis-acting elements in DNA, a prerequisite for any further action of the trans-acting factors involved, requires the establishment of local heterogeneity of chromatin and, in some cases, extensive remodeling of nucleosomal structures. Challenging problems relate to the establishment of this heterogeneity at the level of the single nucleosome and to the mechanisms that operate when nucleosomal arrays are reorganized. Recent developments indicate that chromatin reconstitution in cell-free systems allows the biochemical analysis of the interplay between transcription factors and chromatin components that brings about regulated transcription.

Nucleosome positioning and modification: chromatin structures that potentiate transcription

The role of the nucleosome in the folding of DNA has often been thought of as purely a packaging one. However, the precise folding of regulatory sequences of genes around the histones within positioned nucleosomes is also important in controlling both the access of transcription factors to chromatin and the transcription process itself. This review highlights these functions by using specific examples of an active and regulatory role for positioned nucleosomes.