Neural and hormonal control of postecdysial behaviors in insects

In silico prediction of a neuropeptidome for the eusocial insect Mastotermes darwiniensis

Mastotermes darwiniensis is the most basal living member of the Isoptera (termites), yet it exhibits an extremely advanced level of eusocial organization. Given the interest in, and the high levels of differential developmental and behavioral control needed for, eusociality, it is surprising that essentially nothing is known about the native peptides of M. darwiniensis, which undoubtedly represent the largest and most diverse class of hormones present in this species. The recent public deposition of a 100,000(+)-sequence transcriptome for M. darwiniensis provides a means for peptide discovery in this termite. Here, this resource was mined for putative peptide-encoding transcripts via the BLAST algorithm tblastn and known arthropod neuropeptide precursor queries; mature peptide structures were predicted from the deduced pre/preprohormones using a well-vetted bioinformatics workflow. Thirty-four M. darwiniensis peptide-encoding transcripts were identified, with 163 distinct mature peptides predicted from these sequences. These peptides included members of the adipokinetic hormone, adipokinetic hormone-corazonin-like peptide, allatostatin A, allatostatin C, allatotropin, bursicon β, CCHamide, corazonin, crustacean cardioactive peptide, crustacean hyperglycemic hormone/ion transport peptide, diuretic hormone 31, diuretic hormone 44, FMRFamide-like peptide, insulin-like peptide, leucokinin, myosuppressin, neuroparsin, neuropeptide F, orcokinin, pigment dispersing hormone, pyrokinin, RYamide, short neuropeptide F, SIFamide, sulfakinin and tachykinin-related peptide families. This peptidome is the largest thus far predicted for any member of the Isoptera, and provides a foundation for initiating studies of peptidergic signaling in this and other termites, including ones directed at understanding the roles peptide hormones play in the developmental and behavioral control required for eusociality.

Loss of Polo ameliorates APP-induced Alzheimer's disease-like symptoms in Drosophila

The amyloid precursor protein (APP) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Despite extensive studies, little is known about the regulation of APP’s functions in vivo. Here we report that expression of human APP in Drosophila, in the same temporal-spatial pattern as its homolog APPL, induced morphological defects in wings and larval NMJ, larva and adult locomotion dysfunctions, male choice disorder and lifespan shortening. To identify additional genes that modulate APP functions, we performed a genetic screen and found that loss of Polo, a key regulator of cell cycle, partially suppressed APP-induced morphological and behavioral defects in larval and adult stages. Finally, we showed that eye-specific expression of APP induced retina degeneration and cell cycle re-entry, both phenotypes were mildly ameliorated by loss of Polo. These results suggest Polo is an important in vivo regulator of the pathological functions of APP, and provide insight into the role of cell cycle re-entry in AD pathogenesis.

Genetic analysis of Eclosion hormone action during Drosophila larval ecdysis

Insect growth is punctuated by molts, during which the animal produces a new exoskeleton. The molt culminates in ecdysis, an ordered sequence of behaviors that causes the old cuticle to be shed. This sequence is activated by Ecdysis triggering hormone (ETH), which acts on the CNS to activate neurons that produce neuropeptides implicated in ecdysis, including Eclosion hormone (EH), Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) and Bursicon. Despite more than 40 years of research on ecdysis, our understanding of the precise roles of these neurohormones remains rudimentary. Of particular interest is EH; although it is known to upregulate ETH release, other roles for EH have remained elusive. We isolated an Eh null mutant in Drosophila and used it to investigate the role of EH in larval ecdysis. We found that null mutant animals invariably died at around the time of ecdysis, revealing an essential role in its control. Further analyses showed that these animals failed to express the preparatory behavior of pre-ecdysis while directly expressing the motor program of ecdysis. Although ETH release could not be detected, the lack of pre-ecdysis could not be rescued by injections of ETH, suggesting that EH is required within the CNS for ETH to trigger the normal ecdysial sequence. Using a genetically encoded calcium probe, we showed that EH configured the response of the CNS to ETH. These findings show that EH plays an essential role in the Drosophila CNS in the control of ecdysis, in addition to its known role in the periphery of triggering ETH release.

Model Organisms in G Protein-Coupled Receptor Research

The study of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has benefited greatly from experimental approaches that interrogate their functions in controlled, artificial environments. Working in vitro, GPCR receptorologists discovered the basic biologic mechanisms by which GPCRs operate, including their eponymous capacity to couple to G proteins; their molecular makeup, including the famed serpentine transmembrane unit; and ultimately, their three-dimensional structure. Although the insights gained from working outside the native environments of GPCRs have allowed for the collection of low-noise data, such approaches cannot directly address a receptor's native (in vivo) functions. An in vivo approach can complement the rigor of in vitro approaches: as studied in model organisms, it imposes physiologic constraints on receptor action and thus allows investigators to deduce the most salient features of receptor function. Here, we briefly discuss specific examples in which model organisms have successfully contributed to the elucidation of signals controlled through GPCRs and other surface receptor systems. We list recent examples that have served either in the initial discovery of GPCR signaling concepts or in their fuller definition. Furthermore, we selectively highlight experimental advantages, shortcomings, and tools of each model organism.