Treating the small airways

The effect of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol extra-fine fixed combination on the peripheral airway inflammation in controlled asthma

BACKGROUND

Suppression of small airway inflammation may contribute to achieving asthma control. We aimed to evaluate the additional effect of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) (BDP/F-HFA 100/6 μg pMDI) on airway inflammation and functional parameters in asthma cases, who were optimally controlled by maintenance therapy.

METHODS

Ninety-five controlled asthmatic patients were included. They were grouped as Group 1 [budesonide/formoterol 320/9 μg dry powder inhaler (DPI)] and Group 2 (fluticasone/salmeterol 500/50 μg DPI) according to the combination they used. Then Group 3 was established by random selection from these two groups, and BDP/F-HFA 100/6 μg pMDI treatment was prescribed. All patients were evaluated in the beginning of the study and were re-evaluated at the end of a 3-week treatment period by spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels, and small airway functional indices, namely, Sacin and Scond values.

RESULTS

There was no significant statistical difference in terms of age, height, weight, disease duration, symptoms, and spirometric parameters between the groups. There was a significant decrease in eNO levels in asthma cases who were on BDP/F-HFA therapy (p=0.001). A significant improvement in Sacin values at the end of the treatment period was observed in cases treated with BDP/F-HFA (p=0.001), indicating that inflammation was suppressed in peripheral airways.

CONCLUSIONS

These results emphasize that asthma treatment has mainly focused on the strategy to keep the disease under control; maintaining optimal functional level might be underestimated. BDP/F-HFA may have an additional favorable effect on the peripheral airway inflammation in the controlled asthma.

Small airways dysfunction in asthma: evaluation and management to improve asthma control

The small airways have been neglected for many years, but interest in the topic has been rekindled with recent advances in measurement techniques to assess this region and also the ability to deliver therapeutics to the distal airways. Current levels of disease control in asthmatic patients remain poor and there are several contributory factors including; poor treatment compliance, heterogeneity of asthma phenotypes and associated comorbidities. However, the proposition that we may not be targeting all the inflammation that is present throughout the whole respiratory tree may also be an important factor. Indeed decades ago, pathologists and physiologists clearly identified the importance of small airways dysfunction in asthmatic patients. With improved inhaler technology to deliver drug to target the whole respiratory tree and more sensitive measures to assess the distal airways, we should certainly give greater consideration to treating the small airway region when seeing our asthmatic patients in clinic. The aim of this review is to address the relevance of small airways dysfunction in the daily clinical management of patients with asthma. In particular the role of small particle aerosols in the management of patients with asthma will be explored.

A novel approach to partition central and peripheral airway nitric oxide

BACKGROUND

Determining the site of airways inflammation may lead to the targeting of therapy. Nitric oxide (NO) is a biomarker of airway inflammation and can be measured at multiple exhalation flow rates to allow partitioning into bronchial (large/central airway maximal nitric oxide flux [J'awno]) and peripheral (peripheral/small airway/alveolar nitric oxide concentration [Cano]) airway contributions by linear regression. This requires a minimum of three exhalations. We developed a simple and practical method to partition NO.

METHODS

In 29 healthy subjects (FEV1, 97% ± 3% predicted), 13 patients with asthma (FEV1, 90% ± 4% predicted), 14 patients with COPD (FEV1, 59% ± 3% predicted), and 12 patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) (FEV1, 60% ± 3% predicted), we measured the area under the curve of the NO concentration/exhalation time plot (AUC-NO) at exhalation flow rates of 50, 100, 200, and 300 mL/s. We determined the change of the total AUC-NO production (ΔAUC-NO) among the four different exhalation flow rates and compared these levels to Cano and J'awno indices measured conventionally by linear regression.

RESULTS

The change in AUC-NO between increasing exhalation flow rates of 50 to 200 mL/s (ΔAUC-NO50-200) was strongly correlated with J'awno in all patient groups as follows: healthy subjects (r = 0.94, P < .001), patients with asthma (r = 0.98, P < .001), patients with COPD (r = 0.93, P < .001), and patients with CF (r = 0.74, P < .05). In all subjects, AUC-NO at an exhalation flow rate of 200 mL/s (AUC-NO200) correlated with Cano (r = 0.69, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchial production of NO can be determined by measuring ΔAUC-NO50-200, whereas AUC-NO200 measures its peripheral concentration. This approach is simple, quick, and does not require sophisticated equipment or mathematical models.

Stepping-across controlled asthmatic patients to extrafine beclometasone/formoterol combination

BACKGROUND

Asthma management focuses on achieving and maintaining asthma control. Few studies have assessed whether complete and sustained asthma control is maintained in clinical practice after stepping-across ICS/LABA fixed combinations. Aim of this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel group, controlled study was to demonstrate clinical equivalence between equipotent doses of extrafine beclometasone/formoterol (BDP/F) pMDI and fluticasone/salmeterol (FP/S) Diskus® in maintaining lung function and asthma control.

METHODS

A total of 416 asthmatic patients already controlled with FP/S 500/100 μg/day (Diskus®, pMDI or separate inhalers) were randomized to a 12-week treatment with extrafine BDP/F 400/24 μg/day pMDI or FP/S 500/100 μg/day Diskus®. Pre-dose 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)) was the primary efficacy variable; secondary variables included asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-7) and FEV(1)0-1 h area under the curve (FEV(1)AUC(0-1h)). Safety was assessed through adverse events monitoring and vital signs.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of treatment, pre-dose FEV(1) did not differ between treatments (difference between means 0.01 L; 95% CI -0.03-0.06 L) with no significant changes from baseline in both groups (p = 0.726 and p = 0.783 in BDF/F arm and FP/S, respectively). ACQ-7 score showed that control was maintained after stepping-across to extrafine BDP/F. FEV(1)AUC(0-1h) was significantly higher in BDP/F arm at the beginning (p = 0.004) and at the end of the 12-week treatment period (p = 0.019). No safety issues were reported in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients previously controlled with FP/S in any device formulation can effectively step-across to extrafine BDP/F pMDI, maintaining lung function and asthma control with a 5-min onset of action.