Ascending and Transverse Aortic Arch Repair

Influences on Early and Medium-Term Survival Following Surgical Repair of the Aortic Arch

OBJECTIVES

It is now well established by many groups that surgery on the aortic arch may be achieved with consistently low morbidity and mortality along with relatively good survival compared to estimated natural history for a number of aortic arch pathologies. The objectives of this study were to: 1) report, compare, and analyze our morbidity and mortality outcomes for hemiarch and total aortic arch surgery; 2) examine the survival benefit of hemiarch and total aortic arch surgery compared to age- and sex-matched controls; and 3) define factors which influence survival in these two groups and, in particular, identify those that are modifiable and potentially actionable.

METHODS

Outcomes from patients undergoing surgical resection of both hemiarch and total aortic arch at the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital between June 1999 and December 2012 were examined in a retrospective analysis of data collected for The Society for Cardiothoracic Surgeons (UK).

RESULTS

Over the period studied, a total of 1240 patients underwent aortic surgery, from which 287 were identified as having undergone hemi to total aortic arch surgery under deep or moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. Twenty three percent of patients' surgeries were nonelective. The median age at the time of patients undergoing elective hemiarch was 64.3 years and total arch was 65.3 years (P = 0.25), with 40.1% being female in the entire group. A total of 140 patients underwent elective hemiarch replacement, while 81 underwent elective total arch replacement. Etiology of the aortic pathology was degenerative in 51.2% of the two groups, with 87.1% requiring aortic valve repair in the elective hemiarch group and 64.2% in the elective total arch group (P < 0.001). Elective in-hospital mortality was 2.1% in the hemiarch group and 6.2% (P = 0.15) in the total arch group with corresponding rates of stroke (2.9% versus 4.9%, P = 0.47), renal failure (4.3% versus 6.2%, P = 0.54), reexploration for bleeding (4.3% versus 4.9%, P > 0.99), and prolonged ventilation (8.6% versus 16.1%, P = 0.09). Overall mortality was 20.9% at 5 years, while it was 15.7% in the elective hemiarch and 25.9% in the total arch group (P = 0.065). Process control charts demonstrated stability of annualized mortality outcomes over the study period. Survival curve was flat and parallel compared to age- and sex-matched controls beyond 2 years. Multivariate analysis demonstrated the following independent factors associated with survival: renal dysfunction [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.11; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.44-6.73], New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ III (HR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.38-3.67), circulatory arrest time > 100 minutes (HR = 2.92; 95% CI = 1.57-5.43), peripheral vascular disease (HR = 2.44; 95% CI = 1.25-4.74), and concomitant coronary artery bypass graft operation (HR = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.20-3.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity, mortality, and medium-term survival were not statistically different for patients undergoing elective hemi-aortic arch and total aortic arch surgery. The survival curve in this group of patients is flat and parallel to sex- and age-matched controls beyond 2 years. Multivariate analysis identified independent influences on survival as renal dysfunction, NYHA class ≥ III, circulatory arrest time (> 100 min), peripheral vascular disease, and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Focus on preoperative optimization of some of these variables may positively influence long-term survival.

Aortic arch surgery using moderate hypothermia and unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

BACKGROUND

Cerebral protection and circulatory management remains a controversial issue in aortic arch surgery. The present study reported surgical outcomes of arch repair using moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (MHCA) and unilateral selective antegrade perfusion (uSACP).

METHODS

From January 2004 and December 2012, 500 patients underwent hemiarch repair (HARCH) and 124 underwent total arch replacement (TARCH) utilizing moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest with unilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion of the right axillary artery. Emergent surgery was required in 142 (28.4%) of HARCH patients and 18 (14.5%) of TARCH patients. Mean arrest temperature ranged from 25.6-27.2 °C for elective and emergent operations in both groups. Mean circulatory arrest was 26.8 minutes for hemiarch repairs and 54.2 minutes for total arch replacement.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 6.6% for hemiarch repairs and 9.7% for total arch replacements. Hospital mortality was 4.5% (16/358) and 10.4% (11/106) in elective cases, and 12% (17/142) and 5.6% (1/18) in elective cases, for hemiarch and total arch replacements respectively. Permanent neurological deficit (PND) occurred in 3 total arch replacement cases (2.4%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that temperature was not found to be an independent risk factor during hemiarch or total arch replacements for mortality, permanent or neurological deficits, or renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach for hemiarch and total arch repair utilizing MHCA and uSACP via the right axillary artery was associated excellent neurological and survival outcomes. Moderate hypothermia did not adversely impact cerebral or visceral organ protection.

A reappraisal of retrograde cerebral perfusion

Brain protection during aortic arch surgery by perfusing cold oxygenated blood into the superior vena cava was first reported by Lemole et al. In 1990 Ueda and associates first described the routine use of continuous retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) in thoracic aortic surgery for the purpose of cerebral protection during the interval of obligatory interruption of anterograde cerebral flow. The beneficial effects of RCP may be its ability to sustain brain hypothermia during hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) and removal of embolic material from the arterial circulation of the brain. RCP can offer effective brain protection during HCA for about 40 to 60 minutes. Animal experiments revealed that RCP provided inadequate cerebral perfusion and that neurological recovery was improved with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), however, both RCP and ACP provide comparable clinical outcomes regarding both the mortality and stroke rates by risk-adjusted and case-matched comparative study. RCP still remains a valuable adjunct for brain protection during aortic arch repair in particular pathologies and patients.

Outcomes after ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch repair using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion: analysis of 207 patients

OBJECTIVES

Correction of ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch pathology with numerous surgical techniques having been proposed over the years remains a surgical challenge. This study was undertaken to identify risk factors influencing outcome after aortic arch operations, requiring deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA).

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2010, 207 consecutive patients were operated for ascending aorta and proximal arch correction with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion. All patients were followed up with regular out-patient clinics, transthoracic echocardiography and, when required, chest computed tomography.

RESULTS

There were 102 (49.3%) emergencies (acute type A dissection) and 105 (50.7%) elective cases. Mean age: 63.5 ± 12 years. Mean circulatory arrest time was 25.4 ± 13 min. Unadjusted analysis of factors associated with 30-day mortality revealed emergency status, preoperative hemodynamic instability, acute dissection, reoperation, increased circulatory arrest time, postoperative bleeding, postoperative creatinine levels and presence of neurological dysfunction. Multi-adjusted analysis revealed duration of circulatory arrest as the only and main factor related to death. Thirty-day mortality was 2.4% for the elective and 7.2% for emergencies cases. Survival during long-term follow-up was 93, 82 and 53% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch replacement with brief duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest combined with retrograde cerebral perfusion is a safe method with acceptable short- and long-tem results.

Outcomes following redo sternotomy for aortic surgery

Proximal thoracic aortic reconstruction performed with or without hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) is an effective surgical strategy for aortic pathology. In this study, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery were evaluated. A retrospective review was performed for reoperative proximal aortic surgery from 2004 to date. Patient data were abstracted from the society of thoracic surgeons (STS) institutional database and patient charts. Univariate analysis was conducted on the HCA group in order to determine the impact of variables on in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated for long-term survival analysis. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-seven (22.1%) were female, and the mean age was 53.8 years. Seventy-seven (63.1%) patients had an aortic root replacement, and 93 (76.2%) patients underwent aortic arch replacement. Circulatory arrest was performed in 92 (75.4%) patients. Operative mortality occurred in 14 patients (11.5%). Complications included re-exploration for haemorrhage (nine patients, 7.4%), stroke (four, 3.3%), renal failure (13, 10.7%) and major adverse events (18, 14.8%). Univariate and multivariate analyses of HCA patients showed cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, preoperative renal failure and prior coronary revascularization as independent predictors of mortality. Reoperative proximal aortic surgery can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. These data also suggest that HCA represents a safe operative strategy for this patient population.

Avoiding stroke during cardiac surgery

The life saving benefits of cardiac surgery are frequently accompanied by negative side effects such as stroke, that occurs with an incidence of 2%-13% dependent to type of surgery. The etiology is most likely multifactorial with embolic events considered as main contributor. Although stroke presents a common complication, no guidelines for any routine use of pharmacological substances or non-pharmacological strategies exist to date. Non-pharmacological strategies include monitoring of brain oxygenation and perfusion with devices such as near infrared spectroscopy and Transcranial Doppler help. Epiaortic and transesophageal echocardiography visualize aorta pathology, enabling the surgeon to sidestep atheromatous segments. Additionally can the use of specially designed aortic cannulae and filters help to reduce embolization. Brain perfusion can be improved by using antero- or retrograde cerebral perfusion during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, by tightly monitoring mean arterial blood pressure and hemodilution. Controlling perioperative temperature and glucose levels may additionally help to ameliorate secondary damage. Many pharmacological compounds have been shown to be neuroprotective in preclinical models, but clinical studies failed to confirm these results so far. Remacemide, an NMDA-receptor-antagonist showed a significant drug-based neuroprotection during cardiac surgery. Other substances currently assessed in clinical trials whose results are still pending are acadesine, an adenosine-regulating substance, the free radical scavenger edaravone and the local anesthetic lidocaine. Stroke remains as significant complication after cardiac surgery. Non-pharmacological strategies allow perioperative caregivers to detect injurious events and to ameliorate stroke and its sequelae. Considering the multi-factorial etiology though, stroke prevention will likely have to be addressed with an individualistic combination of different strategies and substances.