Increased Radiographic Posterior Tibial Slope Is Associated With Subsequent Injury Following Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Slope-Correction Osteotomy with Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Highly Effective in Treating High-Grade Anterior Knee Laxity

BACKGROUND

Both an elevated posterior tibial slope (PTS) and high-grade anterior knee laxity are often present in patients who undergo revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, and these conditions are independent risk factors for ACL graft failure. Clinical data on slope-correction osteotomy combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) do not yet exist.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and slope-correction osteotomy combined with LET.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, we performed a 2-stage procedure: slope-correction osteotomy was performed first, and then revision ACLR in combination with LET was performed in 22 patients with ACLR failure and high-grade anterior knee laxity. Twenty patients (6 women and 14 men; mean age, 27.8 ± 8.6 years; range, 18-49 years) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 9.3 months (range, 24-56 months), in this retrospective case series. Postoperative failure was defined as a side-to-side difference of ≥5 mm in the Rolimeter test and a pivot-shift grade of 2 or 3.

RESULTS

The PTS decreased from 15.3° to 8.9°, the side-to-side difference decreased from 7.2 to 1.1 mm, and the pivot shift was no longer evident in any of the patients. No patients exhibited revision ACLR failure and all patients showed good to excellent postoperative functional scores (mean ± SD: visual analog scale, 0.5 ± 0.6; Tegner, 6.1 ± 0.9; Lysholm, 90.9 ± 6.4; Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] Symptoms, 95.2 ± 8.4; KOOS Pain, 94.7 ± 5.2; KOOS Activities of Daily Living, 98.5 ± 3.2; KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation, 86.8 ± 12.4; and KOOS Quality of Life, 65.4 ± 14.9).

CONCLUSION

Slope-correction osteotomy in combination with LET is a safe and reliable procedure in patients with high-grade anterior knee laxity and a PTS of ≥12°. Normal knee joint stability was restored and good to excellent functional scores were achieved after a follow-up of at least 2 years.

Difference in sex and the effect of a dominant lower extremity in the posterior tibial slope angle in healthy Japanese subjects

Background/objective

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are prone to re-injury, and it is crucial to prevent the primary injury. One of the anatomical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury is the posterior tibial slope angle. Investigating the characteristics of healthy individuals with respect to the posterior tibial slope angle is important to elucidate the risk of developing anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics related to sex and of the posterior tibial slope angle in healthy Japanese subjects, and the effect of the dominant lower extremity.

Methods

Sixty-two knees of 31 healthy Japanese college students (15 males and 16 females) were included in this study. Magnetic resonance images of both knee joints of the subjects were measured using a 0.3 T scanner. The medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles were measured from the obtained magnetic resonance images. Magnetic resonance images of the knee joint of the dominant lower extremity were used to compare differences in sexes between the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles. Bilateral knee joint magnetic resonance images were used to compare the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities. Independent t-tests were used to compare the differences regarding sex in the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles and to compare the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities.

Results

A comparison of the mean lateral posterior tibial slope angle showed that males had a 8.8 ± 1.7° angle, while females had a 10.3 ± 2.2° angle, which was significantly greater (p = 0.047). There was no significant difference comparing the posterior tibial slope angle between the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities (p = 0.430).

Conclusions

From the result of this study, the lateral posterior tibial slope angle was significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. However, both the medial and lateral posterior tibial slope angles were found to be unaffected by the dominant lower extremity.

Measurement technique for posterior tibial slope on radiographs can affect its relationship to the risk of anterior cruciate ligament rupture

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the most reliable radiographic measurement method to evaluate PTS as a risk factor for ACL reconstruction failure.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction or ACL revision reconstruction between January 2009 and December 2014 by a single surgeon were included. Fifty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL revision reconstruction were compared to a random selection of 52 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction and a control group of 52 patients without ACL injury. ACL reconstruction was performed using either ipsilateral (primary) or contralateral (revision) quadrupled hamstring autograft. Lateral knee radiographs were evaluated using three methods: (1) longitudinal axis, (2) anterior tibial cortex axis, and (3) posterior tibial cortex.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction and control knees (6.79° vs. 5.31°, p = 0.046) using the posterior tibial cortex method. No other statistical significance was found between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis found that the PTS as measured by any method was not affected by the patient's age, sex, height, weight, and BMI. All methods of measurement for PTS demonstrated excellent (ICC > 0.90) intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, but only the posterior tibial cortex method maintained excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.90) when evaluating patients with ACL revision reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The posterior tibial cortex measurement is the most reliable method for analyzing the PTS on lateral knee radiographs in patients undergoing ACL revision reconstruction.

Lateral meniscal slope negatively affects post-operative anterior tibial translation at 1 year after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between posterior tibial slope and meniscal slope over postoperative anterior tibial translation during the first 18 months after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The main hypothesis was that PTS and MS would be positively correlated with post-operative ATT-SSD after ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients (28 males and 15 females) with confirmed ACL tears were selected from an in-house registry and included if they were over 16 years old, had primary ACL-reconstruction and healthy contralateral knee. Patients meeting one of the following criteria were excluded: previous knee surgeries, intraarticular fractures, associated ligamentous lesions, previous or concomitant meniscectomy or extraarticular procedures. Lateral posterior tibial slope, medial posterior tibial slope, lateral meniscal slope and medial meniscal slope were measured using preoperative MRIs. The side-to-side-difference in anterior tibial translation was evaluated 9-18 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included, (28 males/15 females; mean age 25 ± 8 years). Mean postoperative anterior tibial translation was 1.0 ± 1.1 mm at a mean time of 12 ± 1 months. Mean slope values were: lateral posterior tibial slope 4.7° ± 2.2°, medial posterior tibial slope 4.0° ± 2.8°, lateral meniscal slope 3.0° ± 2.2° and medial meniscal slope 2.0° ± 2.8°. The anterior tibial translation was significantly correlated with lateral meniscal slope (r = 0.63; p < 0.01). For each 1° increase in lateral meniscal slope, a 0.3 mm 95% CI [0.2, 0.4] (p < 0.01) increase in anterior tibial translation was observed. A lateral meniscal slope greater or equal to 4.0° was estimated as optimal threshold for increased risk of abnormal side-to-side difference in postoperative anterior tibial translation (≥ 1.2 mm).

CONCLUSION

The lateral meniscal slope was positively correlated to side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation after primary ACL reconstruction. A lateral meniscal slope greater or equal to 4.0° was detected as threshold for an increased risk of abnormal side-to-side difference in postoperative anterior tibial translation in patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction. This confirms that soft tissue slopes have an impact on the outcomes after reconstructive surgery. Level of evidence III.