What's in a name? That which we call IPF, by any other name would act the same

Predictive factors for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease in anti-synthetase syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). Progressive fibrosing ILD (PF-ILD) may develop in ILD with autoimmune features. Data on PF-ILDs in ASS as a group are scarce. This study aimed to explore the characteristics and predictors of PF-ILD in ASS patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 96 ASS-ILD patients. Baseline clinical data were collected. PF-ILD assessments were conducted at every hospital visit during windows of 24 months after initial diagnosis. Phenotypic, survival features and predictors of PF-ILD were estimated through SPSS 22.0.

RESULTS

The results revealed that 35.42% (34/96) were evaluated to be PF-ILD with a median interval time of 14.73 months. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was the most common radiological pattern of PF-ILD. Ground glass opacity (GGO), traction bronchiectasis and reticulation were representative high-resolution computed tomography findings of this group. Compared with the non-progressive group, PF-ILD patients had higher frequencies of anti-Ro-52 antibodies (91.18% vs 66.13%, P = 0.007) and GGO in the lower + middle and lower + middle + upper zones of the left lung, as well as lower + middle zones in the right lung (85.30% vs 54.84%, P = 0.003; 64.71% vs 38.71%, P = 0.015; 82.35% vs 58.06%, P = 0.016). Multivariate Cox analysis identified that anti-Ro-52 antibody (hazards ratio [HR] 3.55, 95% CI 1.06-11.90, P = 0.040) and GGO in left lower + middle lung zones (HR 22.11, 95% CI 1.95-250.90, P = 0.012) were independent risk factors for PF-ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

PF-ILD was associated with poor prognosis. Over one-third of ASS-ILD patients may develop to PF-ILD. Anti-Ro-52 antibody positivity and GGO in left lower + middle lung zones were independent risk factors for PF-ILD in ASS patients.

p53 and Myofibroblast Apoptosis in Organ Fibrosis

Organ fibrosis represents a dysregulated, maladaptive wound repair response that results in progressive disruption of normal tissue architecture leading to detrimental deterioration in physiological function, and significant morbidity/mortality. Fibrosis is thought to contribute to nearly 50% of all deaths in the Western world with current treatment modalities effective in slowing disease progression but not effective in restoring organ function or reversing fibrotic changes. When physiological wound repair is complete, myofibroblasts are programmed to undergo cell death and self-clearance, however, in fibrosis there is a characteristic absence of myofibroblast apoptosis. It has been shown that in fibrosis, myofibroblasts adopt an apoptotic-resistant, highly proliferative phenotype leading to persistent myofibroblast activation and perpetuation of the fibrotic disease process. Recently, this pathological adaptation has been linked to dysregulated expression of tumour suppressor gene p53. In this review, we discuss p53 dysregulation and apoptotic failure in myofibroblasts and demonstrate its consistent link to fibrotic disease development in all types of organ fibrosis. An enhanced understanding of the role of p53 dysregulation and myofibroblast apoptosis may aid in future novel therapeutic and/or diagnostic strategies in organ fibrosis.

[Interstitial lung diseases : Classification, differential diagnosis and treatment approaches in a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders]

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) comprise a heterogeneous group of chronic lung disorders of different etiologies that can not only affect the interstitium but also the alveolar space and the bronchial system. According to the "Global Burden of Disease Study" there has been an increase in incidence over the last decades and it is expected that the number of ILD-associated deaths will double over the next 20 years. ILD are grouped into those of unknown cause, e.g. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and ILD of known cause, which include drug-induced and connective tissue disease-associated ILD as well as granulomatous ILD such as sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In addition, some ILD present a progressive fibrosing phenotype, which influences therapeutic decisions. Predominantly inflammatory entities are treated with immunosuppressives, whereas predominantly fibrosing ILD are treated with antifibrotic drugs; in some cases, a combination of both is necessary. The spectrum of differential diagnoses in ILD is broad, but definite diagnosis is essential for treatment selection; therefore, the multidisciplinary ILD board plays a pivotal role.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a common interstitial lung disease (ILD), is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia, with an unknown cause. IPF has been linked to several genetic and environmental risk factors. Disease progression is common and associated with worse outcomes. Management often encompasses pharmacotherapy, supportive interventions, addressing comorbidities when present, and treating hypoxia with ambulatory O2. Consideration for antifibrotic therapy and lung transplantation evaluation should occur early. Patients with ILD other than IPF, and who have radiological evidence of pulmonary fibrosis, may have progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: an expert group consensus statement

This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management.

Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Management of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

Interstitial lung disease is an umbrella term that encompasses a spectrum of parenchymal lung pathologies affecting the gas exchanging part of the lung. While many of these disease entities are not fibrotic in nature, a number can lead to pulmonary fibrosis which may or may not progress over time. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is the prototypical, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease, which can lead to worsening hypoxemic respiratory failure and mortality within a number of years from the time of diagnosis. The importance of an accurate and timely diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases, which is needed to inform prognosis and guide clinical management, cannot be overemphasized. Developing a consensus diagnosis requires the incorporation of a variety of factors by a multidisciplinary team, which then may or may not determine a need for tissue sampling. Clinical management can be challenging given the heterogeneity of disease behavior and the paucity of controlled trials to guide decision making. This review addresses current paradigms and recent updates in the diagnosis and pharmacologic management of these fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

Study protocol of an international patient-led registry in patients with pulmonary fibrosis using online home monitoring: I-FILE

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is caused by a heterogeneous group of diseases, with a high inter-individual variability in disease trajectory. Identifying disease progression in patients with PF has impact on clinical management decisions. However, strategies to early identify and predict disease progression for these patients are currently lacking. In this study, we aim to assess long-term FVC change in patients with PF measured with home spirometry, and evaluate the feasibility of a multinational patient-led registry in PF. In addition, we will assess validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) for the different subgroups of patients with PF.

METHODS

In this international, prospective, multicenter, observational study, we aim to include 700 patients across seven European countries. Patients will monitor their disease course for a period of two years using an online home monitoring program (I-FILE), which includes home spirometry, pulse oximetry, and PROMs. Results will be directly sent to the hospital via the online application. Patients will be asked to perform daily home spirometry and pulse oximetry in the first three months, followed by once weekly measurements for a period of two years. PROMs will be completed in the online I-FILE application every six months, including the King's brief Interstitial Lung Disease Health Status, The EuroQol five dimensions five-level, Visual Analogue Scales on cough, dyspnea, fatigue and general complaints, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Fatigue Assessment Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire, Global Rating of Change Scale, and Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide much needed insights in disease trajectories of the different subgroups of patients with PF. Simultaneously, the I-FILE study will yield valuable information on the use and feasibility of home-based data collection. This international patient-led registry will facilitate trans-border collaboration to further optimize care and research for patients with PF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the 12th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov ; Identifier: NCT04304898.

Real-world impact of antifibrotics on prognosis in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

OBJECTIVE

No studies have demonstrated the real-world efficacy of antifibrotics for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of antifibrotics in patients with PF-ILD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ILD from January 2012 to July 2021. Patients were diagnosed with PF-ILD if they had ≥10% fibrosis on high-resolution CT (HRCT) and a relative forced vital capacity (FVC) decline of either ≥10% or >5% to <10% with clinical deterioration or progression of fibrosis on HRCT during overlapping windows of 2 years and with a %FVC of ≥45%. We compared FVC changes and overall survival (OS) between patients with and without antifibrotics. FVC changes were analysed using generalised estimating equations. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) and statistical matching to adjust for covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 574 patients, 167 were diagnosed with PF-ILD (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), n=64; non-IPF, n=103). Antifibrotics improved the FVC decline in both IPF (p=0.002) and non-IPF (p=0.05) (IPW: IPF, p=0.015; non-IPF, p=0.031). Among patients with IPF, OS was longer in the antifibrotic group (log-rank p=0.001). However, among patients with non-IPF, OS was not longer in the antifibrotic group (p=0.3263) (IPW and statistical matching: IPF, p=0.0534 and p=0.0018; non-IPF, p=0.5663 and p=0.5618).

CONCLUSION

This is the first real-world study to show that antifibrotics improve the FVC decline in PF-ILD. However, among patients with non-IPF, we found no significant difference in mortality between those with and without antifibrotics. Future studies must clarify whether antifibrotics improve the prognosis of non-IPF.

Nintedanib in Asian patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: Results from the INBUILD trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) with an adverse event profile characterized mainly by gastrointestinal events. We analysed the effects of nintedanib in the subset of Asian subjects.

METHODS

Subjects with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who had shown progression of ILD at any time within the prior 24 months despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. We analysed the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks in all Asian subjects and in Asian subjects with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like fibrotic pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-four subjects in the INBUILD trial were of Asian race. The rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks in this subgroup was -116.8 in the nintedanib group and -207.9 in the placebo group (difference: 91.0 [95% CI: 8.1, 173.9]; nominal p = 0.03). In Asian subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT, the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks was -130.1 in the nintedanib group and -224.2 in the placebo group (difference: 94.1 [5.5, 182.7]; nominal p = 0.04). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 19.0% of the nintedanib group and 13.8% of the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

In Asian patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC with adverse events that were manageable for most patients.

Pulmonary Fibrosis and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in a Prospective Registry of Interstitial Lung Diseases in Eastern Siberia

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are part of a large heterogeneous group of diseases that differ in many ways (in their cause, clinical presentation, and response to therapy, etc.), but there are similar pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of the inflammation and/or fibrosis of the lungs. Currently, several criteria for pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) are proposed, and the information on the prevalence and characteristics of these conditions is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spectrum of PF and PPF according to the registry of patients with ILD in eastern Siberia. Materials and methods: The study included patients with ILD from all of the medical institutions in the Irkutsk region (eastern Siberia). Each case of ILD (n = 270) was reviewed by a multidisciplinary discussion panel. The ILD patient registry included information on the clinical findings, history, pulmonary function tests, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and histological findings. The follow-up period for the patients varied from 1 to 5 years. Results: Pulmonary fibrosis was detected by HRCT in 104 patients with ILD (38.5%). PF was present in 100% of the patients with IPF and SS-ILD, in 90.9% of the patients with CHP, in 71.4% of the patients with NSIP, and in 60% of the patients with RA-ILD. Sixty-two patients met the criteria for PPF (23.0% of the entire ILD cohort and 59.6% of the patients with PF). PPF occurred most often in the patients with IPF, CHP, IPAF, and SSc-ILD: 100%, 72.7%, 40%, and 38.5% of them, respectively. The variables associated with fibrosis progression included Velcro crackles (OR 18.3, p < 0.001) and late diagnosis (OR 4.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis are common in patients with ILD. The high mortality rate of PPF dictates the need for the active, early detection of a progressive fibrosing course of a wide range of ILD and suggests that further studies assessing the effectiveness of the interventions might be warranted.

Hotspots and Frontiers of Host Immune Response in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Bibliometric and Scientific Visual Research from 2000 to 2022

Background

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a disease with significant morbidity, progressive deterioration of lung function till death, and lack of effective treatment options. This study aims to explore the global research trends in IPF and immune response to predict the research hotspot in the future. Materials and methods. All related publications on IPF and immune response since the establishment of diagnostic criteria for IPF were retrieved using the Web of Science (WOS) database. VOSviewer, GraphPad Prism 6, CiteSpace version 5.6. R5 64-bit, and a bibliometrics online platform were used to extract and analyze the trends in relevant fields.

Results

From March 1, 2000, to September 30, 2022, a total of 658 articles with 25,126 citations met the inclusion criteria. The United States ranked first in number of publications (n = 217), number of citations (n = 14,745), and H-index (62). China ranked second in publications (n = 124) and seventh and fifth for citation frequency and H-index, respectively. The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (impact factor = 30.528) published the most articles in the field. The author Kaminski N. from the United States was the most influential author with 26 publications and an H-index of 24. Among the 52 keywords that co-occurred at least 20 times, the main keywords were concentrated in "Inflammation related" and "Biomarker related" clusters. "biomarker" (AAY 2018.64, 25 times) was a newly emerged keyword.

Conclusions

The United States has an unequivocal advantage in IPF and immunization, but China shows a faster developing trend. The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine should be prioritized for leading articles. This study indicates that exploration of ideal immune-related biomarkers to provide evidence for the clinical work of IPF might be a hotspot in the near future.

Immune cell profiles and patient clustering in complex cases of interstitial lung disease

Interstitial lung disease comprises numerous clinical entities posing significant challenges towards a prompt and accurate diagnosis. Amongst the contributing factors are intricate pathophysiological mechanisms, an overlap between conditions, and interobserver disagreement. We developed a model for patient clustering offering an additional approach to such complex clinical cases. The model is based on surface phenotyping of over 40 markers on immune cells isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage in combination with clinical data. Based on the marker expression pattern we constructed an individual immune cell profile, then merged these to create a global profile encompassing various pathologies. The contribution of each participant to the global profile was assessed through dimensionality reduction tools and the ensuing similarity between samples was calculated. Our model enables two approaches. First, assessing the immune cell population landscape similarity between patients within a diagnostic group allows rapid identification of divergent profiles, which is particularly helpful for cases with uncertain diagnoses. Second, sample clustering is based exclusively on the calculated similarity of the immune cell profiles, thereby removing physician bias and relying on cellular nearest neighbors.

Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease

No biomarkers have been identified in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for predicting fibrosis progression or prognosis in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD). We investigated BALF biomarkers for PF-ILD diagnosis and prognosis assessment. Overall, 120 patients with interstitial pneumonia who could be diagnosed with PF-ILD or non PF-ILD were enrolled in this retrospective study. PF-ILD was diagnosed according to Cottin's definition. All patients underwent bronchoscopy and BALF collection. We evaluated blood and BALF parameters, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) patterns, and spirometry data to identify factors influencing PF-ILD diagnosis and prognosis. On univariate logistic analysis, age, sex, the BALF white blood cell fraction (neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), BALF flow cytometric analysis (CD8), and an idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on HRCT were correlated with PF-ILD diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that sex (male), age (cut-off 62 years, area under the curve [AUC] 0.67; sensitivity 0.80; specificity 0.47), white blood cell fraction in BALF (NLR, neutrophil, and lymphocyte), and CD8 in BALF (cut-off 34.2; AUC 0.66; sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.62) were independent diagnostic predictors for PF-ILD. In BALF, the NLR (cut-off 8.70, AUC 0.62; sensitivity 0.62; specificity 0.70), neutrophil count (cut-off 3.0, AUC 0.59; sensitivity 0.57; specificity 0.63), and lymphocyte count (cut-off 42.0, AUC 0.63; sensitivity 0.77; specificity 0.53) were independent diagnostic predictors. In PF-ILD patients (n = 77), lactate dehydrogenase (cut-off 275, AUC 0.69; sensitivity 0.57; specificity 0.78), Krebs von den Lungen-6 (cut-off 1,140, AUC 0.74; sensitivity 0.71; specificity 0.76), baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) (cut-off 1.75 L, AUC 0.71; sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.46), and BALF neutrophil ratio (cut-off 6.0, AUC 0.72; sensitivity 0.79; specificity 0.80) correlated with death within 3 years. The BALF cellular ratio, particularly the neutrophil ratio, correlated with the diagnosis and prognosis of PF-ILD. These findings may be useful in the management of patients with interstitial pneumonia.

Lung Damage in Rheumatoid Arthritis-A Retrospective Study

The current study aimed to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in clinical practice and whether disease characteristics are associated with X-ray and high-resolution computed tomography (HR-CT) findings. Medical history of RA patients from a tertiary rheumatology clinic was retrieved from its electronic database starting from 1 January 2019 until the study date (8 August 2022) using International Classification of Disease version 10 codes for RA, ILD and exclusion criteria. The study included 78 RA patients (75.6% women, 15.4% active smokers), with average time from RA to ILD of 5.6 years. Regarding chest X-ray findings, men had a higher prevalence of nodules, combined fibrosis and nodules and combined bronchiectasis and nodules, rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients had a higher prevalence of fibrosis and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA)-positive patients had a higher prevalence of bronchiectasis. Regarding HR-CT findings, patients actively treated with methotrexate had a higher prevalence of nodules; a combination of fibrosis and nodules; combination of emphysema and nodules; and combination of fibrosis, emphysema and nodules. ILD develops within approximately 5 years from RA diagnosis, and ILD-associated imaging findings on chest X-rays and HR-CT are more prevalent among men with RA, among patients with positive RA serology (RF and/or ACPA) and RA patients on methotrexate.

Criteria for progressive fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in a Portuguese patient cohort

Background

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a syndrome caused by sensitisation to inhaled antigens that leads to an abnormal immune response in the airways and lung parenchyma. Some patients previously diagnosed with certain types of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (f-ILDs), including fibrotic HP (f-HP), are susceptible to develop a progressive fibrosing phenotype (PF-ILD), despite initial state-of-the-art management.

Objectives

To characterise a cohort of patients with a multidisciplinary diagnosis (MTD) of chronic f-HP, who were followed up in an ILD outpatient clinic of a hospital in Portugal, and to assess the prevalence of PF-ILD criteria in these patients.

Methods

Data were collected from all patients with a definite or provisional diagnosis of f-HP after a multidisciplinary team discussion. Patients were followed up between December 2014 and July 2019. Data included clinical characteristics, high-resolution chest tomography (HRCT) disease patterns, lung function tests, bronchoalveolar lavage and further immunological work-up, biopsy reports (conventional transbronchial lung biopsy, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy or surgical video-assisted thoracoscopic lung biopsy), all ILD multidisciplinary team records and diagnostic confidence levels. Patients were assessed according to PF-ILD criteria as defined in the INBUILD trial.

Results

We identified 83 patients with an MTD of HP, who had been followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 63 (75.9%) were diagnosed with f-HP. Of the 63 f-HP patients, 33.3% (n=21) fulfilled the predefined criteria for PF-HP: 66.7% had a relative decline of ≥10% forced vital capacity (FVC); 5% a relative decline of 5 - 9% FVC, with worsening symptoms or increased fibrosis on HRCT; and 23.8% had worsening respiratory symptoms with radiological progression.

Conclusion

This single-centre cohort study demonstrated that a third of f-HP patients presented with PF-ILD, as determined by progression during initial standard-of-care treatment. A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)/UIP-like pattern was present in >70% of patients with f-HP, and two-thirds of these patients had an FVC decline of ≥10%. PF-HP patients were also more exacerbation prone. According to recent trial data, this segment of patients can be considered possible candidates for antifibrotic treatment, with a reasonable prospect of effectiveness. Further efforts should focus on refining knowledge of longitudinal behaviour of large multicentric cohorts of f-HP patients, establishing a consensual and uniform definition of progression for use in clinical practice, as well as developing prognostic prediction tools to better (and early) inform the disease course.

Current best clinical practices for monitoring of interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and/or fibrotic conditions with variable outcome and often a dismal prognosis. Since many ILDs are progressive in nature, monitoring of signs and symptoms of progression is essential to inform treatment decisions and patient counseling. Monitoring of ILDs is a multimodality process and includes all aspects of the disease, e.g. measurement of pulmonary function and exercise capacity, symptom registration and quality of life (QoL), imaging, comorbidities and/or involvement of other organs to assess disease activity, symptom burden, treatment effects, adverse events, the need for supportive and palliative care, and lung transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

For this narrative review, we searched the PUBMED database to identify articles relevant for monitoring ILDs, including pulmonary function tests, exercise capacity, imaging, telemedicine, symptoms, and QoL.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the high heterogeneity of the ILDs and their disease course, an individualized multimodality approach must be applied. Future strategies include use of telemedicine for home monitoring of lung function and symptoms, use of artificial intelligence to support automatized guidance of patients, computerized evaluation of ILD changes on imaging, and new imaging tools with less radiation dosage.

Guidelines of the Polish Respiratory Society on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases Other than Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

The recommendations were developed as answers to previously formulated questions concerning everyday diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. They were developed based on a review of the current literature using the GRADE methodology. The experts suggest that PF-ILD be diagnosed based on a combination of different criteria, such as the aggravation of symptoms, progression of radiological lesions, and worsening of lung function test parameters. The experts recommend a precise diagnosis of an underlying disease, with serological testing for an autoimmune disease always being included. The final diagnosis should be worked out by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Patients with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF who do not meet the criteria for the progressive fibrosis phenotype should be monitored for progression, and those with systemic autoimmune diseases should be regularly monitored for signs of interstitial lung disease. In managing patients with interstitial lung disease associated with autoimmune diseases, an opinion of an MDT should be considered. Nintedanib rather than pirfenidon should be introduced in the event of the ineffectiveness of the therapy recommended for the treatment of the underlying disease, but in some instances, it is possible to start antifibrotic treatment without earlier immunomodulatory therapy. It is also admissible to use immunomodulatory and antifibrotic drugs simultaneously. No recommendations were made for or against termination of anti-fibrotic therapy in the case of noted progression during treatment of a PF-ILD other than IPF. The experts recommend that the same principles of non-pharmacological and palliative treatment and eligibility for lung transplantation should be applied to patients with an interstitial lung disease other than IPF with progressive fibrosis as in patients with IPF.

Multidisciplinary teams in the clinical care of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: current perspectives

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, involving the integrated collaboration of healthcare professionals, are increasingly used in clinical practice to inform the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Over time, the assessment of patients with ILD has transitioned from discussions among clinicians, radiologists and pathologists to the inclusion of a broader range of clinical data and specialist expertise. Studies have shown that a multidisciplinary approach can have many benefits for the clinical care of patients with ILD by improving the diagnostic confidence for different ILDs and guiding treatment decisions. The utility of MDT discussions for diagnosis, monitoring disease progression and management decisions, will need to be considered based on how it is best positioned in the diagnostic and therapeutic process, as well as the practicality and challenges of its use. There are also uncertainties and heterogeneity concerning the optimal practices of MDT meetings in ILD care. In this review, we describe recent developments refining the approach to MDTs in clinical practice, including who should be involved in the MDTs, when it is most needed, their use in patient management, challenges in their implementation, and ongoing controversies in the field that need further research.

Enhancing Imagistic Interstitial Lung Disease Diagnosis by Using Complex Networks

Background and Objectives: Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD) are a heterogeneous group of over 200 entities, some with dramatical evolution and poor prognostic. Because of their overlapping clinical, physiopathological and imagistic nature, successful management requires early detection and proper progression evaluation. This paper tests a complex networks (CN) algorithm for imagistic aided diagnosis fitness for the possibility of achieving relevant and novel DILD management data. Materials and Methods: 65 DILD and 31 normal high resolution computer tomography (HRCT) scans were selected and analyzed with the CN model. Results: The algorithm is showcased in two case reports and then statistical analysis on the entire lot shows that a CN algorithm quantifies progression evaluation with a very fine accuracy, surpassing functional parameters' variations. The CN algorithm can also be successfully used for early detection, mainly on the ground glass opacity Hounsfield Units band of the scan. Conclusions: A CN based computer aided diagnosis could provide the much-required data needed to successfully manage DILDs.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, full version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Nintedanib for Patients with Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease (PF-ILD)

OBJECTIVES

Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is characterised by increased pulmonary fibrosis, lung function decline, acute exacerbations, decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Nintedanib may slow down disease progression, but long-term outcomes are unknown. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib in comparison to placebo, both on top of usual care in patients with PF-ILD.

METHODS

An individual PF-ILD patient simulation model was created, using data and extrapolations from the nintedanib and placebo arms of the INBUILD trial. Clinical outcomes (mortality, exacerbations, lung transplants), economic outcomes (direct and indirect costs) and the cost-effectiveness of nintedanib over a 10-year time horizon were forecasted using the Netherlands as a case example. Disease progression was driven by lung function decline, with forced vital capacity (FVC) health states ranging from < 40 to ≥ 110 FVC of % predicted. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter assumptions on the cost-effectiveness and to test model robustness.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year follow-up, nintedanib gained an average of 1.31 discounted life years and an average of 0.87 discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €60,690 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed cost variations had a minor impact on the ICER. Results were mainly driven by mortality probabilities and disease-related utilities. Scenario analyses indicated most sensitivity to the time horizon and lung transplantation costs.

CONCLUSION

Long-term treatment with nintedanib could result in considerable health gains for patients with PF-ILD and can be considered cost-effective under the common willingness-to-pay threshold.

Quantitative computed tomography and machine learning: recent data in fibrotic interstitial lung disease and potential role in pulmonary sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to summarize quantitative computed tomography (CT) and machine learning data in fibrotic lung disease and to explore the potential application of these technologies in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data in the use of quantitative CT in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) are covered. Machine learning includes deep learning, a branch of machine learning particularly suited to medical imaging analysis. Deep learning imaging biomarker research in ILD is currently undergoing accelerated development, driven by technological advances in image processing and analysis. Fundamental concepts and goals related to deep learning imaging research in ILD are discussed. Recent work highlighted in this review has been performed in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Quantitative CT and deep learning have not been applied to pulmonary sarcoidosis, although there are recent deep learning data in cardiac sarcoidosis.

SUMMARY

Pulmonary sarcoidosis presents unsolved problems for which quantitative CT and deep learning may provide unique solutions: in particular, the exploration of the long-standing question of whether sarcoidosis should be viewed as a single disease or as an umbrella term for disorders that might usefully be considered as separate diseases.

Development of a scoring system with multidimensional markers for fibrosing interstitial lung disease

Fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) can cause high mortality and sensitive evaluation of fibrosing ILD could be critical. The aim of this study is to develop a scoring system to predict prognosis of fibrosing ILD. 339 patients with fibrosing ILD were enrolled as a derivation cohort. Cox multiple regression analysis indicated that smoking history (HR  =  3.826, p  =  0.001), age(HR  =  1.043, p  =  0.015), CEA(HR  =  1.059, p  =  0.049),CYFRA21-1(HR  =  1.177, p  =  0.004) and DLCO% predicted (HR  =  0.979, p  =  0.032) were independent prognostic factors for fibrosing ILD. The clinical scoring system for fibrosing ILD was established based on the clinical variables (age [A], CEA and CYFRA21-1 [C], DLCO% predicted [D], and smoking history [S]; ACDS). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the scoring system for predicting prognosis of fibrosing ILD was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.87–0.94, p < 0.001). The cutoff value was 2.5 with their corresponding specificity (90.7%) and sensitivity (78.8%). To validate the value of ACDS score levels to predict the survival of patients with fibrosing ILD, 98 additional fibrosing ILD patients were included as a validation cohort. The log-rank test showed a significant difference in survival between the two groups(ACDS score < 2.5 and ACDS score ≥ 2.5) in validation cohort. The independent risk factors for mortality in patients with fibrosing ILD are higher CEA, higher CYFRA21-1, smoking history, lower DLCO%predicted at baseline and older age. ACDS is a simple and feasible clinical model for predicting survival of fibrosing ILD.

French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - 2021 update. Full-length version

BACKGROUND

Since the latest 2017 French guidelines, knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has evolved considerably.

METHODS

Practical guidelines were drafted on the initiative of the Coordinating Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, led by the French Language Pulmonology Society (SPLF), by a coordinating group, a writing group, and a review group, with the involvement of the entire OrphaLung network, pulmonologists practicing in various settings, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a health manager, and a patient association. The method followed the "Clinical Practice Guidelines" process of the French National Authority for Health (HAS), including an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After a literature review, 54 guidelines were formulated, improved, and then validated by the working groups. These guidelines addressed multiple aspects of the disease: epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT scans, lung biopsy indication and procedures, etiological workup, methods and indications for family screening and genetic testing, assessment of the functional impairment and prognosis, indication and use of antifibrotic agents, lung transplantation, management of symptoms, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are intended to guide the diagnosis and practical management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Towards Treatable Traits for Pulmonary Fibrosis

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, of which many have the potential to lead to progressive pulmonary fibrosis. A distinction is usually made between primarily inflammatory ILD and primarily fibrotic ILD. As recent studies show that anti-fibrotic drugs can be beneficial in patients with primarily inflammatory ILD that is characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis, treatment decisions have become more complicated. In this perspective, we propose that the ‘treatable trait’ concept, which is based on the recognition of relevant exposures, various treatable phenotypes (disease manifestations) or endotypes (shared molecular mechanisms) within a group of diseases, can be applied to progressive pulmonary fibrosis. These targets for medical intervention can be identified through validated biomarkers and are not necessarily related to specific diagnostic labels. Proposed treatable traits are: cigarette smoking, occupational, allergen or drug exposures, excessive (profibrotic) auto- or alloimmunity, progressive pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, tuberculosis, exercise intolerance, exertional hypoxia, and anxiety and depression. There are also several potential traits that have not been associated with relevant outcomes or for which no effective treatment is available at present: air pollution, mechanical stress, viral infections, bacterial burden in the lungs, surfactant-related pulmonary fibrosis, telomere-related pulmonary fibrosis, the rs35705950 MUC5B promoter polymorphism, acute exacerbations, gastro-esophageal reflux, dyspnea, and nocturnal hypoxia. The ‘treatable traits’ concept can be applied in new clinical trials for patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis and could be used for developing new treatment strategies.

Extracellular vesicles in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: pathogenesis and therapeutics

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease that occurs due to increased fibrosis of lung tissue in response to chronic injury of the epithelium. Therapeutic options for IPF remain limited as current therapies only function to decrease disease progression. Recently, extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes and microvesicles, have been recognized as paracrine communicators through the component cargo. The population of cell-specific microRNAs and proteins present in EVs can regulate gene expressions of recipient cells, resulting in modulation of biological activities. EV cargoes reflect cell types and their physiological and pathological status of donor cells. Many current researches have highlighted the functions of EVs on the epithelial phenotype and fibroproliferative response in the pathogenesis of IPF. Furthermore, some native EVs could be used as a cell-free therapeutic approach for IPF as vehicles for drug delivery, given their intrinsic biocompatibility and specific target activity. EV-based therapies have been proposed as a new potential alternative to cell-based approaches. The advantage is that EVs, depending on their source, may be less immunogenic than their parental cells, likely due to a lower abundance of transmembrane proteins such as major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins on the surface. In the last decade, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived EVs have been rapidly developed as therapeutic products ready for clinical trials against various diseases. Considering EV functional complexity and heterogeneity, there is an urgent need to establish refined systemic standards for manufacturing processes and regulatory requirements of these medicines. This review highlights the EV-mediated cellular crosstalk involved in IPF pathogenesis and discusses the potential for EV-based therapeutics as a novel treatment modality for IPF.

COVID-19-Associated Lung Fibrosis: Two Pathways and Two Phenotypes, Lung Transplantation, and Antifibrotics

COVID-19 can be associated with lung fibrosis. Although lung fibrosis after COVID-19 is a relatively rare finding, the mere fact that globally a very large number of patients have had COVID-19 leads to a significant burden of disease. However, patients with COVID-19-associated lung fibrosis have different clinical and radiological features. The aim of this review is to define the different phenotypes of COVID-19-associated lung fibrosis, based on the medical literature. We found that two phenotypes have emerged. One phenotype is COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS); the other phenotype is post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (PCPF). Both phenotypes have different risk factors, clinical, and radiological features, and differ in their pathophysiological mechanisms and prognoses. A long-term follow-up of patients with pulmonary complications after COVID-19 is warranted, even in patients with only discrete fibrosis. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment because currently the literature is scarce, and evidence is only based on small case series or case reports.

The Antifibrotic Effects of Inhaled Treprostinil: An Emerging Option for ILD

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of parenchymal lung diseases characterized by variable amounts of inflammation and fibrosis. The targeting of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts with antifibrotic treatments is a potential therapeutic target for these potentially fatal diseases. Treprostinil is unique among the prostacyclin mimetics in that it has distinct actions at additional prostaglandin receptors. Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that treprostinil has antifibrotic effects through the activation of the prostaglandin E receptor 2 (EP₂), the prostaglandin D receptor 1 (DP₁), and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR). In vivo studies of EP₂ and the DP₁ have found that administration of treprostinil resulted in a reduction in cell proliferation, reduced collagen secretion and synthesis, and reduced lung inflammation and fibrosis. In vitro and in vivo studies of PPARβ and PPARγ demonstrated that treprostinil inhibited fibroblast proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Clinical data from a post hoc analysis of the INCREASE trial found that inhaled treprostinil improved forced vital capacity in the overall population as well as in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis subgroups. These preclinical and clinical findings suggest a dual benefit of treprostinil through the amelioration of both lung fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension.

Meta-Analysis of Effect of Nintedanib on Reducing FVC Decline Across Interstitial Lung Diseases

INTRODUCTION

The effect of nintedanib on slowing the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) has been investigated in randomized placebo-controlled trials in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), and ILD associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD). We assessed the consistency of the effect of nintedanib on the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks across four placebo-controlled phase III trials.

METHODS

We used data on FVC decline from the INPULSIS-1 and INPULSIS-2 trials in subjects with IPF, the INBUILD trial in subjects with progressing fibrosing ILDs other than IPF, and the SENSCIS trial in subjects with SSc-ILD. In each trial, the primary endpoint was the annual rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) assessed over 52 weeks. We performed fixed effect and random effects meta-analyses based on the relative treatment effect of nintedanib versus placebo on the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks. Heterogeneity of the relative treatment effect of nintedanib across populations was assessed using the I2 statistic, τ2 and corresponding p value from a Q test for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The combined analysis comprised 1257 subjects treated with nintedanib and 1042 subjects who received placebo. Nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks by 51.0% (95% CI 39.1, 63.0) compared with placebo. The relative effect (95% CI) was the same using the fixed effect and random effects models. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the relative treatment effect of nintedanib across the populations studied (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0, p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

A meta-analysis of data from four placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that nintedanib approximately halved the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks across subjects with different forms of pulmonary fibrosis, with no evidence of heterogeneity in its relative treatment effect across patient populations.

Clinical and radiological features of lung disorders related to connective-tissue diseases: a pictorial essay

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) include a spectrum of disorders that affect the connective tissue of the human body; they include autoimmune disorders characterized by immune-mediated chronic inflammation and the development of fibrosis. Lung involvement can be misdiagnosed, since pulmonary alterations preceded osteo-articular manifestations only in 20% of cases and they have no clear clinical findings in the early phases. All pulmonary structures may be interested: pulmonary interstitium, airways, pleura and respiratory muscles. Among these autoimmune disorders, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), pulmonary nodules and airway disease with air-trapping, whereas non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), pulmonary hypertension and esophageal dilatation are frequently revealed in systemic sclerosis (SSc). NSIP and organizing pneumonia (OP) may be found in patients having polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM); in some cases, perilobular consolidations and reverse halo-sign areas may be observed. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by serositis, acute lupus pneumonitis and alveolar hemorrhage. In the Sjögren syndrome (SS), the most frequent pattern encountered on HRCT images is represented by NSIP; UIP and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP) are reported with a lower frequency. Finally, fibrotic NSIP may be the interstitial disease observed in patients having mixed connective tissue diseases (MCTD). This pictorial review therefore aims to provide clinical features and imaging findings associated with autoimmune CTDs, in order to help radiologists, pneumologists and rheumatologists in their diagnoses and management.

Pulmonary fibrosis associated with rheumatoid arthritis: from pathophysiology to treatment strategies

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory autoimmune disease, characterised by symmetric destructive arthritis and synovitis. Lung involvement is frequent, including in the form of interstitial lung disease (ILD). RA-ILD often presents with a radiologic and pathologic pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia, similar to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, highlighting the similarities between the two diseases, but other patterns and pathological associations are described.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis as well as the current and future therapeutic options.

EXPERT OPINION

Pulmonary fibrosis in the setting of RA-ILD is an example of genotype-environment interaction and involves multiple mechanisms including autoimmunity, inflammation and fibrogenesis. Despite that ILD conveys most of the exceeding mortality in RA patients, there are no official guidelines for the management of RA-ILD. Attention should be paid to potential lung toxicity of RA treatment even though some of them might help stabilise the ILD. Current standard of care is often composed of glucocorticoids that may be associated with immunosuppressive therapy. Following the approval of antifibrotic therapy for ILDs with a progressive fibrosing phenotype, current works are evaluating the benefit of such treatment in RA-ILD.

Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To inform an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax clinical practice guideline, this systematic review evaluated existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic nintedanib. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using nintedanib to treat patients with PPF. Mortality, disease progression, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Two relevant studies were selected. The annual decline in FVC was less in the nintedanib arm in the overall study population [mean difference (MD) 107 milliliters (mL)/year (yr) (95% CI 65.4-148.5 mL/yr)] and in the subgroups with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of pulmonary fibrosis [MD 128.2 mL/yr (95% CI 70.8-185.6 mL/yr)], non-UIP patterns of pulmonary fibrosis [MD 75.3 mL/yr (95% CI 15.5-135.0 mL/yr)], fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD [MD 106.2 mL/yr (95% CI 10.6-201.9 mL/yr)], fibrotic idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia [MD 141.7 mL/yr (95% CI 46.0-237.4 mL/yr)], and fibrotic occupational ILD [MD 252.8 mL/yr (95% CI 79.2-426.5 mL/yr)], but not fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis [MD 72.9 mL/yr (95% CI -8.9-154.7 mL/yr)], fibrotic sarcoidosis [MD -20.5 mL/yr (95% CI -337.1-296.1 mL/yr)], or unclassified fibrotic ILD [MD 68.5 mL/yr (95% CI -31.3-168.4 mL/yr)] when compared to placebo. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects were common. Quality of evidence for the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate GRADE. Conclusions: Nintedanib use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression but increase in GI side effects regardless of the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis. However, limitations in the available evidence lead to low certainty in these effect estimates and make definitive conclusions about the differential effects by subtype of ILD difficult to determine.

Pirfenidone in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To inform an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax clinical practice guideline, this systematic review evaluated existing interstitial lung disease literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic pirfenidone. Methods: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using pirfenidone to treat patients with PPF. Mortality, disease progression, lung function, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: Two studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed changes in FVC % predicted [mean difference (MD) 2.3% (95% CI 0.5-4.1)], FVC in mL [MD 100.0 mL (95% CI 98.1-101.9)], and 6MWD in meters [MD 25.2 m (95% CI 8.3-42.1)] all favored pirfenidone to placebo. Change in DLCO in mmol/kPa/min [MD 0.40 mmol/kPa/min (95% CI 0.10-0.70)] and risk of DLCO declining more than 15% [relative risk (RR) 0.27 (95% CI 0.08-0.95)] also favored pirfenidone. The risks of gastrointestinal discomfort [RR 1.83 (95% CI 1.29-2.60)] and photosensitivity [RR 4.88 (95% CI 1.09-21.83)] were higher with pirfenidone. The quality of evidence was low or very low GRADE, depending on the outcome. Conclusions: Pirfenidone use in patients with PPF is associated with statistically significant decrease in disease progression and protection in lung function. However, there is very low certainty in the estimated effects due to limitations in the available evidence.

Usual interstitial pneumonia: a clinically significant pattern, but not the final word

Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is a concept that is deeply entrenched in clinical practice and the prognostic significance of UIP is well established, but the field continues to suffer from the lack of a true gold standard for diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). The meaning and usage of UIP have shifted over time and this term is prone to misinterpretation and poor diagnostic agreement. For pathologists, it is worth reflecting on the limitations of UIP and our true role in the care of patients with ILD, a controversial topic explored in two point-counterpoint editorials published simultaneously in this journal. Current diagnostic guidelines are ambiguous and difficult to apply in clinical practice. Further complicating matters for the pathologist is the paradigm shift that occurred with the advent of anti-fibrotic agents, necessitating increased focus on the most likely etiology of fibrosis rather than simply the pattern of fibrosis when pulmonologists select appropriate therapy. Despite the wealth of information locked in tissue samples that could provide novel insights into fibrotic ILDs, pulmonologists increasingly shy away from obtaining biopsies, likely because pathologists no longer provide sufficient value to offset the risks of a biopsy procedure, and pathologic assessment is insufficiently reliable to meaningfully inform therapeutic decisionmaking. To increase the value of biopsies, pathologists must first recognize the problems with UIP as a diagnostic term. Second, pathologists must realize that the primary goal of a biopsy is to determine the most likely etiology to target with therapy, requiring a shift in diagnostic focus. Third, pathologists must devise and validate new classifications and criteria that are evidence-based, biologically relevant, easy to use, and predictive of outcome and treatment response. Only after the limitations of UIP are understood will pathologists provide maximum diagnostic value from biopsies to clinicians today and advance the field forward.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (an Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results:1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

Safety and tolerability of nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: data from the randomized controlled INBUILD trial

Background

In the INBUILD trial in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), nintedanib reduced the rate of decline in forced vital capacity compared with placebo, with side-effects that were manageable for most patients. We used data from the INBUILD trial to characterize further the safety and tolerability of nintedanib.

Methods

Patients with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), who had experienced progression of ILD within the 24 months before screening despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice, were randomized to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo. To manage adverse events, treatment could be interrupted or the dose reduced to 100 mg twice daily. We assessed adverse events and dose adjustments over the whole trial.

Results

A total of 332 patients received nintedanib and 331 received placebo. Median exposure to trial drug was 17.4 months in both treatment groups. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 22.0% of patients treated with nintedanib and 14.5% of patients who received placebo. The most frequent adverse event was diarrhea, reported in 72.3% of patients in the nintedanib group and 25.7% of patients in the placebo group. Diarrhea led to treatment discontinuation in 6.3% of patients in the nintedanib group and 0.3% of the placebo group. In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, 48.2% and 15.7% of patients had ≥ 1 dose reduction and/or treatment interruption. Serious adverse events were reported in 44.3% of patients in the nintedanib group and 49.5% of patients in the placebo group. The adverse event profile of nintedanib was generally consistent across subgroups based on age, sex, race and weight, but nausea, vomiting and dose reductions were more common among female than male patients.

Conclusions

The adverse event profile of nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF is consistent with its established safety and tolerability profile in patients with IPF and characterized mainly by gastrointestinal events, particularly diarrhea. Management of adverse events using symptomatic therapies and dose adjustment is important to minimize the impact of adverse events and help patients remain on therapy.

Trial registration Registered 21 December 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02999178

Graphical Abstract

A video abstract summarizing the key results presented in this manuscript is available at: https://www.globalmedcomms.com/respiratory/cottin/INBUILDsafety.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-01974-2.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Related Costs in Chronic Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases with a Progressive Phenotype: A US Claims Database Analysis

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to describe healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) patterns and costs in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) and those with a progressive phenotype of fibrosing ILD in a US claims database.

METHODS

Data from the IBM^® MarketScan^® databases (1 October 2011-30 September 2015) were used. Diagnosis codes documented on medical claims on two occasions (without any claims during the 12 months prior) identified patients with incident fibrosing ILD. Patients with chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype were identified by proxies for progression. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with 365 days of continuous coverage before the index date were eligible for inclusion. Data were analyzed for 12 months prior to identification of fibrosing ILD/progressive phenotype (baseline) and 12 months after (follow-up). Outcomes included treatment patterns, outpatient and inpatient claims, and costs.

RESULTS

We identified 23,577 patients with incident fibrosing ILD and 14,722 with the progressive phenotype. Follow-up data were available for 9986 and 5840 patients, respectively. The most frequent ILD-related medications during baseline were corticosteroids (49.4% and 56.6%). Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) annualized number of outpatient claims was 30.0 (± 26.4) and 34.1 (± 27.7) in the baseline period and 36.2 (± 28.6) and 41.9 (± 30.2) in the follow-up in fibrosing ILD and with a progressive phenotype, respectively. Mean (SD) number of all-cause hospitalizations was 0.5 (± 1.1) and 0.7 (± 1.2) during baseline and 0.6 (± 1.1) and 0.7 (± 1.2) during follow-up. Mean (SD) total costs were $40,907 (± 92,496) and $49,561 (± 98,647) during baseline and $46,157 (± 102,858) and $54,215 (± 116,833) during follow-up. Inpatient mortality during follow-up was 53.50 and 77.44 per 1000 patient-years.

CONCLUSION

HCRU and costs were high in patients with chronic fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype, likely reflecting the disease severity and the need for close monitoring and acute care. Outpatient claims accounted for a substantial proportion of the total costs.

Developing a conceptual model of symptoms and impacts in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures

Background

An understanding of the experience of patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) is needed to select appropriate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment effect in clinical trials.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted to develop a preliminary conceptual model of the symptoms experienced by patients with PF-ILD and the impacts the disease has on them. An online survey and consensus meetings were then conducted with 12-14 stakeholders (patients, clinicians, regulatory and payer advisors) to refine the conceptual model and critically appraise how key concepts should be measured by PROMs. PROMs assessed included Living with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis, the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire, Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms, Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (Dyspnoea/Fatigue) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Results

The literature review identified 36 signs/symptoms and 43 impacts directly or indirectly related to pulmonary aspects of PF-ILD. The most relevant symptoms identified by participants included shortness of breath on exertion, fatigue and cough; relevant impacts included effects on physical functioning, activities of daily living and emotional wellbeing. These are presented in a conceptual model. Consensus opinion was that existing PROMs need further modification and validation before use in clinical trials.

Conclusions

The conceptual model improves understanding of the symptoms and impacts that living with PF-ILD has on patients' wellbeing. It can help to inform the choice of PROMs in clinical trials and highlight aspects to assess in the clinical care of patients with PF-ILD.

Diagnosis, course and management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex and heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) that occurs when susceptible individuals develop an exaggerated immune response to an inhaled antigen. In this review, we discuss the latest guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected HP, the importance of identifying patients with fibrotic and progressive disease, and the evidence supporting the drugs commonly used in the treatment of HP. Differential diagnosis of HP can be challenging and requires a thorough exposure history, multidisciplinary discussion of clinical and radiologic data, and, in some cases, assessment of bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis and histopathologic findings. Patients with HP may be categorised as having non-fibrotic or fibrotic HP. The presence of fibrosis is associated with worse outcomes. A proportion of patients with fibrotic HP develop a progressive phenotype, characterised by worsening fibrosis, decline in lung function and early mortality. There are no established guidelines for the treatment of HP. Antigen avoidance should be implemented wherever possible. Immunosuppressants are commonly used in patients with HP but have not been shown to slow the worsening of fibrotic disease. Nintedanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for slowing the progression of chronic fibrosing ILDs with a progressive phenotype, including progressive fibrotic HP. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as oxygen therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation and supportive care, may be important components of the overall care of patients with progressive HP.

[French practical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IPF - 2021 update, short version]

BACKGROUND

Since the previous French guidelines were published in 2017, substantial additional knowledge about idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has accumulated.

METHODS

Under the auspices of the French-speaking Learned Society of Pulmonology and at the initiative of the coordinating reference center, practical guidelines for treatment of rare pulmonary diseases have been established. They were elaborated by groups of writers, reviewers and coordinators with the help of the OrphaLung network, as well as pulmonologists with varying practice modalities, radiologists, pathologists, a general practitioner, a head nurse, and a patients' association. The method was developed according to rules entitled "Good clinical practice" in the overall framework of the "Guidelines for clinical practice" of the official French health authority (HAS), taking into account the results of an online vote using a Likert scale.

RESULTS

After analysis of the literature, 54 recommendations were formulated, improved, and validated by the working groups. The recommendations covered a wide-ranging aspects of the disease and its treatment: epidemiology, diagnostic modalities, quality criteria and interpretation of chest CT, indication and modalities of lung biopsy, etiologic workup, approach to familial disease entailing indications and modalities of genetic testing, evaluation of possible functional impairments and prognosis, indications for and use of antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, symptom management, comorbidities and complications, treatment of chronic respiratory failure, diagnosis and management of acute exacerbations of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-based guidelines are aimed at guiding the diagnosis and the management in clinical practice of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Predictors of mortality in subjects with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

Background and objective

Demographic and clinical variables, measured at baseline or over time, have been associated with mortality in subjects with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). We used data from the INPULSIS trials in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and the INBUILD trial in subjects with other progressive fibrosing ILDs to assess relationships between demographic/clinical variables and mortality.

Methods

The relationships between baseline variables and time‐varying covariates and time to death over 52 weeks were analysed using pooled data from the INPULSIS trials and, separately, the INBUILD trial using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Over 52 weeks, 68/1061 (6.4%) and 33/663 (5.0%) subjects died in the INPULSIS and INBUILD trials, respectively. In the INPULSIS trials, a relative decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) >10% predicted within 12 months (hazard ratio [HR] 3.77) and age (HR 1.03 per 1‐year increase) were associated with increased risk of mortality, while baseline FVC % predicted (HR 0.97 per 1‐unit increase) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted (HR 0.77 per 1‐unit increase) were associated with lower risk. In the INBUILD trial, a relative decline in FVC >10% predicted within 12 months (HR 2.60) and a usual interstitial pneumonia‐like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (HR 2.98) were associated with increased risk of mortality, while baseline DLCO % predicted (HR 0.95 per 1‐unit increase) was associated with lower risk.

Conclusion

These data support similarity in the course of lung injury between IPF and other progressive fibrosing ILDs and the value of FVC decline as a predictor of mortality.

We assessed relationships between baseline and time‐varying factors and mortality over 52 weeks in 1061 subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and 663 subjects with other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Our findings support similarity in the course of IPF and ILD and an association between decline in forced vital capacity and mortality.

The Burden of Progressive-Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases

Despite conventional treatment, a proportion of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients develop a progressive phenotype known as "fibrosing ILD with a progressive phenotype" (PF-ILD), characterized by worsening respiratory symptoms, decline in lung function, and early mortality. This review describes the epidemiology, and the humanistic and economic burden of PF-ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (non-IPF PF-ILD). A structured review of the literature was conducted, using predefined search strategies in Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE, and supplemented with gray literature searches. The search identified 3,002 unique articles and an additional 3 sources were included from the gray literature; 21 publications were included. The estimated prevalence of non-IPF PF-ILD ranges from 6.9 to 70.3/100,000 persons and the estimated incidence from 2.1 to 32.6/100,000 person-years. Limited evidence demonstrates that PF-ILD has a significant impact on patients' quality of life, affecting their daily lives, psychological well-being, careers, and relationships. PF-ILD is also associated with significant economic burden, demonstrating higher healthcare resource use and direct costs compared with the non-progressive phenotype, and indirect costs, which include job losses. This review indicates that PF-ILD places a considerable humanistic burden on both patients and caregivers, and a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems, patients, and society.

Challenges for Clinical Drug Development in Pulmonary Fibrosis

Pulmonary fibrosis is a pathologic process associated with scarring of the lung interstitium. Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) encompass a large and heterogenous group of disorders, a number of which are characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis that leads to respiratory failure and death. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has been described as an archetype of progressive fibrosing ILD, and the development of pirfenidone and nintedanib has been a major breakthrough in the treatment of patients with this deadly disease. Both drugs principally target scar-forming fibroblasts and have been shown to significantly slow down the accelerated decline of lung function by approximately 50%. In addition, nintedanib has been approved for patients with other progressive fibrosing ILDs and systemic sclerosis-associated ILD. However, there is still no cure for pulmonary fibrosis and no meaningful improvement of symptoms or quality of life has been shown. Advancement in research, such as the advent of single cell sequencing technology, has identified additional pathologic cell populations beyond the fibroblast which could be targeted for therapeutic purposes. The preclinical and clinical development of novel drug candidates is hampered by profound challenges such as a lack of sensitive clinical outcomes or suitable biomarkers that would provide an early indication of patient benefit. With the availability of these anti-fibrotic treatments, it has become even more difficult to demonstrate added efficacy, in particular in short-term clinical studies. Patient heterogeneity and the paucity of biomarkers of disease activity further complicate clinical development. It is conceivable that future treatment of pulmonary fibrosis will need to embrace more precision in treating the right patient at the right time, explore novel measures of efficacy, and likely combine treatment options.