Frequency of epilepsy in patients with psychogenic seizures monitored by video-EEG

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a concise review

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are commonly diagnosed and treated at epilepsy centers; however, their neurobiology is still poorly understood. Diagnosis relies on a multidisciplinary evaluation and is usually based on different combinations of data. They are diagnosed most reliably by recording a seizure while under video-EEG monitoring. Treatment includes multiple phases. Fewer than 40% of adults with PNES are expected to become seizure-free within 5 years after diagnosis. This article presents a concise review of the current literature about the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of PNES.

The approach to patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in epilepsy surgery centers regarding diagnosis, treatment, and education

Previous studies, using surveys, provided an understanding about how health-care providers address patients with PNES. To date, there is limited information on the management of patients with PNES by tertiary referral centers for epilepsy. In this study, we surveyed 11 Brazilian epilepsy center directors about diagnosis, treatment, education and research on PNES. Respondents reported that patients with PNES represented 10-20% of all adult patients recorded by video-EEG (VEEG). All respondents recognized VEEG as the method to confirm the diagnosis, and 81.8% used this approach for confirmation. Most centers had a standard protocol for diagnosis. None of the centers had a particular protocol to treat PNES, but 90.9% had a uniform treatment approach including therapy and educational measures. Psychotherapy was not easily obtained in nine centers (81.8%). Seven (63.3%) centers reported ongoing research projects with PNES. Five centers referred to an educational PNES program discussing diagnosis, but only one reported an educational program for treatment. This study showed a commitment to PNES diagnosis; however, some gaps remain regarding treatment and training, namely implementing a psychotherapy approach for patients and providing educational curricula for clinicians.

Video-EEG results and clinical characteristics in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic spells: The effect of a coexistent epilepsy

RATIONALE

Epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES) can coexist, often posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We sought to identify clinical and historical characteristics of two groups of patients, those with coexisting epilepsy and PNES and those with PNES alone, and determine the prevalence of coexisting epilepsy/PNES with strict diagnostic criteria in a large group of epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) patients.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of all consecutive patients admitted to the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Adult EMU between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2012. We identified patients with recorded PNES and classified them as having coexisting epilepsy/PNES or PNES alone and then systematically compared the clinical characteristics of these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1567 patient medical records were reviewed. The prevalence rate of coexisting epilepsy/PNES was 5.2% among all EMU admissions (12.3% of all patients with epilepsy and 14.8% of all patients with PNES). These rates were lower when patients with interictal epileptiform activity (IEA) alone and no recorded ictal discharges were not included in the group with epilepsy (2.6%, 6.2%, and 7.4%, respectively). The accuracy of pre-EMU clinical suspicion was significantly higher in the group with PNES-only. Patients with epilepsy/PNES were significantly more likely to require more than one EMU admission for definitive diagnosis. The first PNES event preceded an epileptic seizure (ES) in 94.4% of patients with epilepsy/PNES. The group with PNES-only had significantly higher suggestibility, and the group with epilepsy/PNES had a significantly higher presence of epilepsy risk factors. Abnormal neurological examination and abnormal brain MRI were also significantly more common in the group with epilepsy/PNES.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study defined the prevalence of coexisting epilepsy/PNES in a large cohort with strict diagnostic criteria and outlined specific clinical and historical characteristics differentiating the two groups of patients with coexisting epilepsy/PNES and PNES-only. These findings should help guide clinicians to reach the correct diagnosis faster and provide appropriate treatment earlier.

Comparison of semiologies between tilt-induced psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

We sought to characterize the clinical features of tilt-induced psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse (PNSC) from a cohort of young patients and to compare the semiologies between PNSC and EEG-confirmed psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). A PNSC diagnosis was made if a clinical event occurred during tilt-table testing that the patient regarded as fainting, but neither hypotension nor EEG changes were present. A diagnosis of PNSC was made in 17.6% of all patients referred during the 15-month study period. Cohorts with psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse (n=40) and PNES (n=40) did not differ in age (15.5±2.2 versus 14.6±2.7, p=.11) or female gender (80% versus 72.5%, p=.43). Psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse events were briefer than PNES events (median: 45 versus 201.5s, p<.001). Negative motor signs (head drop, body limpness) predominated in PNSC (85% versus 20%, p<.001), while the positive motor signs of convulsion occurred more often with PNES (90% versus 30%, p<.001). Behavioral arrest (25% versus 32.5%, p=.46) and eye closure (85% versus 72.5%, p=.21) did not differ between PNSC and PNES. Patients with PNSC were more likely to be tearful before (30% versus 7.5%, p=.02) and after (62.5% versus 7.5%, p<.001) an event. In conclusion, although overlap exists, the features of PNSC generally appear similar to neurally mediated syncope, while the features of PNES generally appear similar to epileptic seizures. Psychogenic nonsyncopal collapse and PNES likely represent similar disorders that differ primarily by clinical semiologies and referral patterns.

Which patients with epilepsy are at risk for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES)? A multicenter case-control study

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the clinical and electrographic differences between patients with combined epileptic (ES) and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and age- and gender-matched patients with ES-only and PNES-only.

METHODS

Data from 138 patients (105 women [77%]), including 46 with PNES/ES (39±12years), 46 with PNES-only (39±11years), and 46 with ES-only (39±11years), were compared using logistic regression analysis after adjusting for clustering effect.

RESULTS

In the cohort with PNES/ES, ES antedated PNES in 28 patients (70%) and occurred simultaneously in 11 (27.5%), while PNES were the initial presentation in only 1 case (2.5%); disease duration was undetermined in 6. Compared with those with ES-only, patients with PNES/ES had higher depression and anxiety scores, shorter-duration electrographic seizures, less ES absence/staring semiology (all p≤0.01), and more ES arising in the right hemisphere, both in isolation and in combination with contralateral brain regions (61% vs. 41%; p=0.024, adjusted for anxiety and depression) and tended to have less ES arising in the left temporal lobe (13% vs. 28%; p=0.054). Compared with those with PNES-only, patients with PNES/ES tended to show fewer right-hemibody PNES events (7% vs. 23%; p=0.054) and more myoclonic semiology (10% vs. 2%; p=0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

Right-hemispheric electrographic seizures may be more common among patients with ES who develop comorbid PNES, in agreement with prior neurobiological studies on functional neurological disorders.

Health care utilization following diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

OBJECTIVES

The long-term outcome of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is of importance given the disabling symptoms and tendency to affect patients early in their productive years. Health care utilization (HCU) is an important outcome measure reflecting overall health status and costs. There is little information regarding long-term HCU following diagnosis of PNES.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of Veterans diagnosed with PNES during epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) evaluation. For the three-year period following diagnosis of PNES, we reviewed emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, outpatient clinic visits, and radiology procedures. We compared the three years following PNES diagnosis with the three years preceding diagnosis. We also compared patients with PNES and patients with epileptic seizures (ES).

RESULTS

Emergency department visits and hospitalizations were more frequent in patients with PNES compared with those in patients with ES (p=0.01). There was no overall improvement in HCU during the three-year interval following diagnosis of PNES. A transient decrease during the year following diagnosis was not sustained over three-year follow-up. Pain complaints rather than seizures were the most common reason for presentation, whereas the opposite was true for patients with ES (p<0.01). There was a sharp decrease in neurology outpatient visits (p<0.001) and a decrease in primary care visits (p<0.05) after PNES was diagnosed. Total outpatient visits were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall HCU did not improve during the three years following diagnosis of PNES, compared with three years preceding diagnosis. The results add to studies documenting poor seizure outcomes following diagnosis of PNES and underscore the need for more effective and comprehensive treatments, addressing comorbid symptoms.

Psychiatric comorbidity in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures compared with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) are closely linked with psychological distress, but their etiology is not well-understood. We reviewed psychiatric comorbidity in PNESs and epileptic seizures (ESs) with an aim to assist understanding, diagnosis, and management of PNESs.

METHODS

A search of Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, and Scopus identified 32 relevant studies on the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in PNESs. We used meta-analysis to compare psychiatric comorbidity between PNESs and ESs.

RESULTS

Samples with PNESs had high rates of psychiatric comorbidity overall (53-100%), notably including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and personality and anxiety disorders. Compared with ESs, samples with PNESs had more psychiatric comorbidity overall (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48, p<0.0001) with significantly elevated risks found for PTSD, personality disorder, and anxiety but not depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric disorders are more common in PNESs than ESs. Because of methodological limitations of available studies, causality cannot be established; prospective longitudinal designs are required.

The impact of receiving a diagnosis of Non-Epileptic Attack Disorder (NEAD): A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clinicians have reported observations of the immediate cessation of non-epileptic attacks after the diagnosis of NEAD is presented.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the impact of receiving a diagnosis of NEAD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A literature search across the databases Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CINAHL, and additional hand searching, identified six original studies meeting criteria for the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Included studies were original peer-reviewed articles investigating the impact of receiving a diagnosis of NEAD on adult populations with at least one outcome measured pre- and post-diagnosis.

ANALYSIS

The studies were assessed for methodological quality, including biases. This assessment was developed to include criteria specific to research regarding NEAD and diagnosis.

RESULTS

Six identified studies, with a total of 153 NEAD participants, examined the impact of receiving a diagnosis on seizure frequency. Two of the six also examined the impact on health-related quality of life. The findings were inconsistent, with approximately half the participants experiencing seizure reduction or cessation post-diagnosis. Diagnosis appeared to have no significant impact on health-related quality of life. The overall evidence lacked quality, particularly in study design and statistical rigour.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed results and a lack of high quality evidence were found. Concerns are considered regarding the appropriateness of seizure frequency as the primary outcome measure and the use of epilepsy control groups. Indications for future research include: measuring more meaningful outcomes, using larger samples and power calculations, and ensuring consistent and standard methods for communicating the diagnosis and recording outcomes.

Thoughts, emotions, and dissociative features differentiate patients with epilepsy from patients with psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNESs)

Psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNESs) are often very difficult to treat, which may be, in part, related to the limited information known about what a person experiences while having PNESs. For this retrospective study, thoughts, emotions, and dissociative features during a spell were evaluated in 351 patients diagnosed with PNESs (N=223) or epilepsy (N=128). We found that a statistically higher number of thoughts, emotions, and dissociative symptoms were endorsed by patients with PNESs versus patients with epilepsy. Patients with PNESs reported significantly more anxiety and frustration, but not depression, compared with those with epilepsy. Emotions and dissociations, but not thoughts, and a history of any type of abuse were endorsed significantly more often by patients with PNESs. Patients with PNESs are prone to having poor outcomes, and interventions focusing on their actual experiences may be helpful for treatment planning.

Epidemiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

We critically review the existing literature about the epidemiology (i.e., diagnosis, occurrence, age, gender, comorbidity with epilepsy, associated factors, prognosis, mortality, and cost) of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and provide suggestions for future research. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures are commonly diagnosed at epilepsy centers. The diagnosis of PNES relies on a multidisciplinary evaluation and is usually based on different combinations of data. Recording a seizure, while under video-EEG monitoring, is the most reliable diagnostic test. However, not all patients present with seizures while under video-EEG monitoring. Furthermore, not all epileptic seizures produce visible changes in the scalp EEG. The incidence of PNES was estimated to be 1.4-4.9/100,000/year in three previous studies, and the prevalence was calculated to be between 2 to 33 per 100,000 in one study, making it a significant neuropsychiatric condition. However, there remains a scarcity of data about the epidemiology of PNES, and extant studies that assessed the epidemiological characteristics of PNES have significant limitations. For example, inconsistencies with regard to the age of patients studied and lack of standardization of the diagnostic criteria are some of the significant limitations among studies. In conclusion, PNES merit further epidemiological and pathophysiological investigation. A more precise definition and clear guidance on standards for the diagnosis might influence the direction of future research. Well-designed prospective population-based studies to clarify the epidemiology of PNES in various parts of the world, including an evaluation of the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating factors in cross-cultural comparisons is required.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and psychogenic movement disorders: two sides of the same coin?

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and psychogenic movement disorders (PMD) are commonly seen in Neurology practice and are categorized in the DSM-5 as functional neurological disorders/conversion disorders. This review encompasses historical and epidemiological data, clinical aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment and prognosis of these rather challenging and often neglected patients. As a group they have puzzled generations of neurologists and psychiatrists and in some ways continue to do so, perhaps embodying and justifying the ultimate and necessary link between these specialties.

Panic attack symptoms differentiate patients with epilepsy from those with psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES)

Psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES) are frequently challenging to differentiate from epileptic seizures. The experience of panic attack symptoms during an event may assist in distinguishing PNES from seizures secondary to epilepsy. A retrospective analysis of 354 patients diagnosed with PNES (N=224) or with epilepsy (N=130) investigated the thirteen Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV-Text Revision panic attack criteria endorsed by the two groups. We found a statistically higher mean number of symptoms reported by patients with PNES compared with those with epilepsy. In addition, the majority of the panic attack symptoms including heart palpitations, sweating, shortness of breath, choking feeling, chest discomfort, dizziness/unsteadiness, derealization or depersonalization, fear of dying, paresthesias, and chills or hot flashes were significantly more frequent in those with PNES. As patients with PNES frequently have poor clinical outcomes, treatment addressing the anxiety symptomatology may be beneficial.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in an Irish tertiary referral centre for epilepsy

Objectives: To examine the prevalence, psychiatric co-morbidity and management of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in patients admitted to a tertiary referral Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU).

Methods: Medical records of patients admitted to the EMU between 2003 and 2005 were examined and data from neurological, neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological assessments were analysed.

Results: Over a three year period 224 patients were referred to the EMU and 44 (20%) were diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). A total of 13 people (6%) were diagnosed with both PNES and epilepsy. Of those diagnosed with PNES 34 (75%) were referred to psychology services for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and 26 (58%) were followed-up by psychiatry services.

Conclusions: The prevalence rates for PNES and co-existing PNES and epilepsy are consistent with previous reports. Rates of psychiatric co-morbidity were less than would be expected in this clinical population. Clear evidence-based guidelines to manage people with PNES are required.

Postictal serum creatine kinase for the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: a systematic review

The aim of this review was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of postictal creatine kinase (CK) levels in the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures (ES) and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). A systematic search was conducted for studies that evaluated postictal CK levels in patients with ES (all types) and PNES. Sensitivity and specificity with 95 % confidence intervals were determined for each study, taking into account: (a) the upper limits adopted; and (b) the 95.7th percentile values, which are recently proposed practical upper reference limits for CK activity. Four studies, comprising a total of 343 events (248 ES and 95 PNES), were available for analysis. Most patients (47/78, 60 %) with ES considered had primarily or secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The sensitivity of increased postictal CK levels for ES ranged from 14.6 to 87.5, whereas specificity ranged from 85.0 to 100.0. At the 95.7th percentile threshold, sensitivity ranged from 14.6 to 62.5 and specificity was 100.0. The limited number of studies available, their small sample size, and lack of individual event data prevented further stratification analysis by seizure type. Despite the clinical heterogeneity and the limitations of the included studies, increased postictal CK levels are highly specific for the diagnosis of ES, although no definite conclusion on its role in differentiating between convulsive and non-convulsive ES can be drawn. Postictal serum CK levels can provide valuable retrospective information at the later stages of the differential diagnosis of ES and PNES. Due to low sensitivity, normal postictal CK levels do not exclude ES.

Pitfalls of Psychogenic Non-epileptic Status Epilepticus

Objectives and Background: In patients with medically refractory seizures 20–30% do not have epilepsy, and the majority are diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). Almost one-third of this group has a prolonged episode that is termed as PNES status epilepticus (PNES-SE). The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients with (1) PNES-SE only and (2) PNES-SE with concurrent epileptic seizures.

Methods: We screened retrospectively all patients who underwent video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG) long-term monitoring at our institution between 1996 and 2009. Patients with PNES were identified by typical clinical features with no ictal EEG changes. Patients with continuous episodes for at least 30 min that led to intubation were identified as PNES-SE. They were divided into two groups: group 1, pure PNES-SE and group 2, PNES-SE with concurrent epilepsy. Group characteristics were defined with respect to demographic, clinical, electroencephalographic, neuroimaging and psychiatric variables.

Results: PNES were recorded in 88/916 patients (10%) of whom 6 (7%) were treated intensively due to misdiagnosis of status epilepticus (SE), with two having coexistent epileptic seizures. All patients had concurrent psychiatric disorder(s), diagnosed by a psychiatrist. Duration of time until correct diagnosis was lengthy in all cases, and particularly for patients with PNES-SE with coexisting epileptic seizures (more than 10 years).

Conclusion: To avoid iatrogenic complications and to treat the underlying psychiatric conditions, early diagnosis of PNES is necessary. Understanding the clinical characteristics of PNES-SE leads to early diagnoses, which may avoid iatrogenesis and economic burden.

Clinical utility of ictal eyes closure in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and psychogenic events

The presence of ictal eye closure (IEC) has been considered to represent an additional clinical sign supporting the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic events (PNEEs). We undertook a systematic review to evaluate sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) of IEC in the differential diagnosis between PNEEs and epileptic seizures. Six studies (total of 1496 events; 1021 epileptic seizures and 475 PNEEs) were included. Pooled accuracy measures of IEC for the diagnosis of PNEE were: sensitivity 58% (0.579) (95% CI 0.534-0.623), specificity 80% (0.895) (95% 0.875-0.9131)%, pLR 5.524 (95% CI 4.546-6.714) and nLR 0.47 (95% CI 0.422-0.524). However, a sensitivity analysis including only the studies performing an IEC assessment blinded to the diagnoses yielded results indicative of a rather low diagnostic value of IEC (pLR 3.056) compared with the analysis including unblinded studies (pLR 12.754). Further studies evaluating the occurrence of IEC through direct observation by means of video-EEG recording and blind to both EEG tracings and patient diagnosis are therefore required to definitely estimate the diagnostic utility of this sign in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and PNEEs.

An update on non-epileptic seizures: Diagnosis and brief notes on treatment

Non-epileptic seizures (NES) are episodes that appear as epileptic seizures, but are not caused by epileptic discharges in the brain. The inclusion of NES in the differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures is important, as an accurate diagnosis is required for the administration of appropriate treatment. NES in the differential diagnosis may be classified as (1) physiologic or pathophysiologic NES, e.g. syncope, sleep disturbances, motor symptoms, migraine attacks, etc., and (2) psychogenic NES (PNES), e.g. affective disorders with anxiety or panic, dissociative disorders (somatoform or conversion) as well as depression or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PNES is the condition most frequently misdiagnosed as epilepsy. We report NES as experienced in our epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) for adults in the neurology department of a university hospital in Norway. Our main emphasis is on PNES, highlighting the diagnostic procedures, currently recommended treatment options, and follow-up. A team approach with video-EEG monitoring and clinical observation by trained nurses, epileptologists and other personnel is preferred in the diagnosis and treatment of PNES. Evaluations are performed by a neuropsychologist and trained social worker. The EMU closely cooperates with cardiologists and sleep center specialists. They can also refer patients to psychosomatic medicine specialists. Components of the differential diagnosis addressed are syncope, motor symptoms, sleep disorders, migraine and other paroxysmal neurological symptoms.

Psychiatric comorbidity in veterans with psychogenic seizures

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are frequently encountered in epilepsy monitoring units (EMU) at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) and cause significant long-term disability. An understanding of psychiatric factors associated with PNES could aid in earlier diagnosis and treatment. We studied 50 consecutive veterans diagnosed with PNES and 37 veterans diagnosed with epileptic seizures (ES), evaluated at a VAMC EMU. We reviewed all available mental health evaluations prior to EMU evaluation. Univariate comparisons included axis I diagnoses, axis II diagnoses, and psychiatric hospitalizations. Predictive models of seizure classification were evaluated by logistic regression. A diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) preceded the diagnosis of PNES in 58% of patients and the diagnosis of ES in 13.5% (p<0.001). On logistic regression, PTSD was the only significant psychiatric diagnosis (odds ratio 9.2). Major depression and alcohol abuse were common diagnoses but did not differentiate PNES and ES groups.

Ictal characteristics of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: what we have learned from video/EEG recordings--a literature review

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are highly prevalent in selected populations, with a strong impact in terms of morbidity and social cost. The gold standard for PNES diagnosis is video/EEG recording of a typical attack. However this technique is costly and not always available. In addition, many patients are treated with antiepileptic drugs for several years before undergoing video/EEG recording. The diagnosis is further complicated by concomitant epileptic seizures in some patients with PNES. Therefore, a good knowledge of PNES semiology is important for early screening of patients for video/EEG recording and for correct interpretation of the examination. We reviewed the literature on video/EEG studies reporting ictal PNES semiology to identify features indicative of psychogenic or epileptic seizures. Several features appeared to be useful in the clinical setting.

Impact of family functioning on quality of life in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures versus epilepsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate different contributions of aspects of family functioning (FF) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) versus epileptic seizures (ES).

METHODS

Forty-five participants with PNES and 32 with ES completed self-report measures of FF (Family Assessment Device; FAD), HRQOL (Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31), and depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II; BDI-II). The FAD is a self-report questionnaire that assesses FF along six dimensions and general functioning. Regression analyses were used to evaluate the contribution of FF to HRQOL above and beyond the effects of disease severity and depression.

KEY FINDINGS

Mean Family General Functioning fell in the unhealthy range in participants with ES or PNES. On further analysis, male participants in each group endorsed unhealthy levels of FF compared to female participants. Patients with PNES reported poorer HRQOL and greater depressive symptoms compared to ES participants; there were no gender differences in HRQOL. Regression analyses indicated that the FAD Roles subscale predicted reduced HRQOL in patients with PNES after controlling for illness duration, seizure frequency, and depression. After controlling for the same factors, Communication and Affective Involvement subscales scores predicted HRQOL in ES participants.

SIGNIFICANCE

Family dysfunction was reported in both ES and PNES participants, but greater family dysfunction was experienced by male participants in both groups. Aspects of FF predicted HRQOL in patients with PNES and ES differentially. FF may be an important treatment target to enhance coping in these groups, although the treatments may need to target different aspects of FF in PNES versus ES.

Epilepsy in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of epilepsy in patients who presented psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). The evaluation was carried out during intensive VEEG monitoring in a diagnostic center for epilepsy in a university hospital. The difficulties involved in reaching this diagnosis are discussed. Ninety-eight patients underwent intensive and prolonged video-electroencephalographic (VEEG) monitoring; out of these, a total of 28 patients presented PNES during monitoring. Epilepsy was defined as present when the patient presented epileptic seizures during VEEG monitoring or when, although not presenting epileptic seizures during monitoring, the patient presented unequivocal interictal epileptiform discharges. The frequency of epilepsy in patients with PNES was 50% (14 patients). Our findings suggest that the frequency of epilepsy in patients with PNES is much higher than that of previous studies, and point out the need, at least in some cases, for prolonging the evaluation of patients with PNES who have clinical histories indicating epilepsy.

Clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

OBJECTIVES

To examine baseline clinical features of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) in a large cohort and to investigate outcome over a period of up to 10 years. Studies investigating PNES have been limited by differences in diagnostic criteria, short follow-up periods, and the use of limited outcome measures.

METHOD

Patients with PNES were identified, using strict diagnostic criteria. Baseline neurological, neuropsychiatric, and neuroimaging data were obtained from medical records. Long-term outcome was assessed with ratings of seizures, psychopathology, and quality of life in a subset of the patients.

RESULTS

Patients with PNES (n = 221) experienced long delays in diagnosis (mu, 5.6 years; standard deviation, 7.7 years) and high rates (>60%) of prolonged treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Compared with previous studies, a relatively low proportion (8.1% to 17.9%, depending on diagnostic criteria) had comorbid epilepsy. An unexpected finding was that 22.6% of PNES patients had magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. Patients assessed at follow-up (n = 61) exhibited poor long-term outcomes with ongoing PNES, high rates of psychopathology, low rates of specialist follow-up, poor quality of life, and poor overall levels of functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the need for earlier diagnosis of PNES and comorbidities and highlight the need for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that combine neurological and psychiatric perspectives.

A prospective study on the cost-effective utilization of long-term inpatient video-EEG monitoring in a developing country

To investigate diagnostic value, therapeutic benefit and cost-effective utilization of video-EEG monitoring (VEM) in a comprehensive epilepsy program in a developing country. The authors prospectively recruited all patients who underwent long-term (> or =3 hours) inpatient VEM during a 10-month period. The cohort was followed to gather information about the proportion of patients in whom long-term management was altered by VEM and resultant impact on direct health care costs. Out of 143 study subjects (median age 22 years), 102 (71.3%) were referred for presurgical evaluation. The median duration of VEM was 61 hours, and median number of events recorded per patient was 3. Video-EEG monitoring helped to clarify the epilepsy syndromic diagnosis in 123 of 132 (93.2%) patients referred with the diagnosis of epileptic seizures. Video-EEG monitoring confirmed coexistent complex partial seizures in 4 of 11 (36.4%) patients with a referral diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic events. During mean follow-up period of 2.2 years, 48 patients (33.6%) underwent epilepsy surgery. A significant decrease in antiepileptic drug polytherapy, and minimization in recurring direct medical and nonmedical costs occurred. In addition to immediate diagnostic usefulness, VEM contributes significantly to long-term therapeutic and economic benefits for patients with difficult to diagnose and treat paroxysmal events.

Prevalence of self-reported epilepsy, health care access, and health behaviors among adults in South Carolina

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from South Carolina for 2003-2005 were used to determine epilepsy prevalence and prevalence variation by demographic subgroups, and to compare health insurance coverage, health care visits, and health-related behaviors among persons with epilepsy and the general population. Two percent of respondents reported they had ever been told by a doctor that they had epilepsy, and 1% reported active epilepsy. Almost half of those with active epilepsy reported a seizure in the prior 3 months. More than one-third of respondents with active epilepsy reported that there was a time in the past 12 months when they needed to see a doctor but could not because of cost. Persons with epilepsy were more likely to smoke and have less physical activity. Persons with epilepsy need better access to health care, as well as interventions focused on smoking cessation and increased physical activity.

Sensitivity and specificity of video alone versus electroencephalography alone for the diagnosis of partial seizures

We examined the usefulness of video versus EEG in isolation for the differentiation of epileptic seizures (ES) from psychogenic nonepileptic events (PNEE). Video-EEG recordings of 43 events in 43 patients (27 with ES and 16 with PNEE) were analyzed by experienced clinical epileptologists/electroencephalographers blinded to the patients' clinical histories. Both the video and EEG were scored independently by the same reader for each event. Relying on video recordings alone, the readers correctly identified ES with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 94%. Based on EEG data alone, the readers correctly identified ES with a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 94%. Semiologically, a gradual evolving buildup of visible symptoms, reaching maximal behavioral intensity within 70 seconds of event onset, was a reliable indicator of ES. No patient with ES demonstrated eye closure at the time of peak behavioral manifestations. Although several additional semiologic features were statistically associated with either ES or PNEE, they were less reliably present and, hence, less clinically useful. Correct categorization of some neurobehavioral events can be made by experienced epileptologists on the basis of video or EEG recordings during an event, without simultaneous review of both provided that the full event is recorded. Home video recordings may represent a useful screening tool for a subset of patients with neurobehavioral events of unclear etiology.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in patients with learning disability: comparison with patients with no learning disability

Among a consecutive series of patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), we compared patients with learning disability (LD) (n=25) with patients with no LD (n=263), with respect to demographic and clinical variables. A higher proportion of the LD group had epilepsy as well as PNES (P<0.001) (uncorrected P values are quoted), and a higher proportion were taking antiepileptic drugs at the time of diagnosis of PNES (P=0.007). Fewer patients with LD had a history of antecedent sexual abuse (P=0.036). A higher proportion of the LD group had previous pseudostatus (P<0.001), and a higher proportion had immediate situational or emotional triggers for their attacks (P<0.001). There were trends toward a higher proportion of men in the LD group (P=0.056) and a longer delay between onset of PNES and diagnosis (P=0.072). Our data suggest potentially important clinical differences between PNES populations with and without LD, as well as possible differences in mechanism.

Development of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in response to auditory hallucinations

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures can co-exist with epileptic seizures. Differentiating between the two is central to appropriate management. We report the case of a patient with established focal epilepsy who developed psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in direct response to second-person auditory hallucinations. To our knowledge, this is the first description of such an occurrence. These non-epileptic seizures improved with treatment of the underlying psychosis. The relationship between epilepsy and psychosis is outlined, and the possible causes and nosology of these psychogenic non-epileptic seizures are discussed.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Neurological, neurodiagnostic, and neuropsychological aspects of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are reviewed, including psychosocial, psychiatric, cognitive, and MMPI-2 findings.

Diagnostic utility of an epilepsy monitoring unit

Guidelines recommend that patients with persist- ent seizures not responsive to standard antiepileptic drugs after 1 year be referred to specialized epilepsy centers for evaluation, which may include inpatient video-electroencephalographic monitoring. This 1-year retrospective, limited-focus review of 213 admissions and 3-year postdischarge review of epilepsy surgery referrals sought to determine if admission to an inpatient adult epilepsy monitoring unit resulted in a definitive diagnosis, a change in diagnosis or treatment, and whether referral patterns were consistent with guidelines. The median duration of time since symptom onset prior to admission was 15 years. At discharge, 87.8% of admissions received a definitive diagnosis. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 73.3% and excluded in 21.6%. Admissions without epilepsy had been treated with antiepileptic drugs for a median of 9 years. Admission resulted in change in treatment in 79%. This review documents the diagnostic utility of an epilepsy monitoring unit while highlighting that time since symptom onset to admission exceeded established guidelines.

Methodological issues in conducting treatment trials for psychological nonepileptic seizures

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial has yet to be completed in patients with psychological nonepileptic seizures (NES). Treatment publications for NES are limited to class III trials and class IV reports. Little is written on the methodology of treatment trials in NES. The authors describe the procedures and limitations of such a trial to inform future NES treatment trials, based on their prospective, open-label pharmacological, feasibility trial. The authors review the recruitment, enrollment, completion of surveys, compliance, and follow-up of patients with NES. The majority of patients who enrolled, readily completed surveys and took the medication during the trial. Twelve patients were screened, eight enrolled, and six completed the trial. The authors discuss the use of outcomes and the various symptoms scales in the trial. A comprehensive neuropsychiatric initial assessment and assessing cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and psychosocial measures are important for monitoring the outcomes in NES treatment RCTs.

Video-EEG Study of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: Differential Characteristics in Patients with and without Epilepsy

PURPOSE

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are episodes that may resemble epileptic seizures (ES) but are not associated with abnormal electrical discharges in the brain. Video-EEG recording of a typical episode is considered the best diagnostic tool available. PNES are, however, also documented in patients with epilepsy (PNES/ES). The purpose of this study was to assess this comorbid population, focusing on the differences between patients with PNES/ES and patients with PNES alone.

METHODS

We reviewed 110 PNES episodes, occurring spontaneously or induced by means of suggestion techniques, recorded in our video-EEG laboratory over a period of eight years. We identified two subgroups of patients, consisting of 85 PNES cases and 25 PNES/ES cases, and assessed any differences in their characteristics by reviewing a number of variables (age, sex, clinical features, antiepileptic therapy, age of onset, time to diagnosis, pathological history, and length of follow-up).

RESULTS

The comparison between the two subgroups revealed that PNES/ES patients displayed some statistically significant differences when compared with PNES alone patients, i.e., younger age, a higher percentage of spontaneously activated events, a shorter disease duration, a longer time to PNES diagnosis, and a lower percentage lost at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that PNES is a common, though probably underestimated, occurrence in epilepsy services. Our results shed light on some different characteristics between PNES and PNES/ES patients.

Cognitive Impairment Is Not Equal in Patients with Epileptic and Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures

PURPOSE

Patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and those with epileptic seizures (ES) purportedly have roughly equal neurocognitive deficits. However, recent findings suggest that patients with somatoform disorders exhibit more variable effort on neurocognitive testing than do controls. We reexamined neurocognitive function in patients with ESs and PNES by using symptom validity testing to control for variability in effort.

METHODS

Patients referred for video-EEG monitoring were administered the Word Memory Test (WMT), a measure of symptom validity, as part of neuropsychological evaluation. Patients classified with ictal video-EEG recordings as having ES (n = 41) or PNES (n = 43) were compared on neurocognitive and WMT performance and demographic, psychiatric, and medical variables.

RESULTS

Striking rates of WMT failure were observed in the PNES (51.2%) group, but not in the ES (8.1%) group (p = <0.001) after controlling for false-positive errors. Although the PNES and ES groups reported equivalent neurologic histories, the PNES group exhibited less objective evidence of impairment as measured by valid neuropsychological testing, MRI of the brain, and video-EEG monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients with PNES do not put forth maximal effort during neuropsychological assessment. When patients with PNES put forth valid effort, they demonstrate less objective evidence of neuropathologic injury or disease than do patients with ES. The cognitive impairment reported by this group appears to be more a function of motivational (although not necessarily intentional) factors than of verifiable neuropathology.

Performance of Patients with Epilepsy or Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures on Four Measures of Effort

Exaggeration of cognitive symptoms or poor effort on cognitive testing has been addressed primarily in the traumatic brain injury literature. The present investigation aims to extend the evaluation of effort to the epilepsy monitoring setting, where base rates of failure on effort testing remain unknown for patients with intractable epilepsy (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or both conditions (ES+PNES). In addition, this investigation explores how well four measures of effort (DMT, LMT, TOMM, PDRT) distinguish between these diagnostic groups. Results show that 20% of the combined sample failed one or more effort measure. When examining failure rates for each diagnostic group, 22% of epilepsy patients, 24% of PNES patients, and 11% of ES+PNES patients performed suboptimally on one or more measure of effort. The utility of these effort measures to differentiate between these diagnostic groups appears limited. Further research is needed to clarify the base rate of poor effort in the epilepsy monitoring unit setting in general and in these three diagnostic groups specifically.