Renal Dysfunction Influences the Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I

Hypertonic Mannitol for the Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension: A Randomized Controlled Trial

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a common complication at the initiation of hemodialysis (HD) therapy, is associated with greater mortality, and may be related to relatively rapid shifts in plasma osmolality. This study sought to evaluate the effect of an intervention to minimize intradialytic changes in plasma osmolality on the occurrence of IDH.

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blind, single-center, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Individuals requiring initiation of HD for acute or chronic kidney disease.

INTERVENTION

Mannitol, 0.25g/kg/h, versus a similar volume of 0.9% saline solution during the first 3 HD sessions.

OUTCOMES

The primary end point was average decline in systolic blood pressure (SBP). The secondary end point was the proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH (defined as a decrease ≥ 20mm Hg from the pre-HD SBP). Exploratory end points included biomarkers of cardiac and kidney injury.

RESULTS

52 patients were randomly assigned and contributed to 156 study visits. There were no significant differences in average SBP decline between the mannitol and placebo groups (15±11 vs 19±16mm Hg; P = 0.3). The proportion of total sessions complicated by IDH was lower in the mannitol group compared to placebo (25% vs 43%), with a nominally lower risk for developing an episode of IDH (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14-1.00), though this finding was of borderline statistical significance (P = 0.05). There were no consistent differences in cardiac and kidney injury biomarker levels between treatment groups.

LIMITATIONS

Modest sample size and number of events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot randomized controlled trial studying patients requiring initiation of HD, we found no difference in absolute SBP decline between those who received mannitol and those who received saline solution. However, there were fewer overall IDH events and a nominally lower risk for dialysis sessions being complicated by IDH in the mannitol group. A larger multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted.

FUNDING

Government funding to an author (Dr Mc Causland is supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant K23DK102511).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT01520207.

Prognostic value of high-sensitive cardiac troponin I in asymptomatic chronic hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Increased levels of cardiac troponins (cTn) are a hallmark of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), along with symptoms and electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Stably elevated cTn concentrations are frequently observed in asymptomatic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and/or on hemodialysis (HD); the meaning of this elevation, as assessed by conventional techniques, remains unclear. Aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical significance of cTnI levels in asymptomatic HD patients by employing a newer high-sensitive cTnI (hs-cTnI) assay.

METHODS

We enrolled 49 patients undergoing regular HD treatment for more than 3 months; all patients were asymptomatic for chest pain and had no history of acute coronary syndrome in the past 2 months. For every patient we measured hs-cTnI, cTnI and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) before initiation of one HD session at baseline (T0), after 3 (T1) and 9 months (T2). Demographic, anamnestic, dialytic and echocardiographic characteristics of the examined population were evaluated. We also recorded the number of cardiovascular events from T0 to 12 months after T2.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were lost to follow-up: 6 died, 2 underwent kidney transplantation, 7 did not match the inclusion criteria later during observation. At T0 (49 patients) we observed 14 hs-cTnI positive patients vs. 4 standard c-TnI positive patients (28,5% vs 8,1%); at T1 (40 patients) 16 vs 3 (26.4% vs 7.5%); at T2 (34 pz) 9 vs 0 (26.4% vs 0%). During the study we recorded 10 cardiovascular events, 8 of which in patients that were hs-cTNI positive, leading to death in 3. Hs-cTnI levels were predictive of cardiovascular events at all times and predictive of cardiovascular mortality at T0 and T1 (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) was an independent variable of high hs-cTnI levels at T0 (p < 0.04) and T1 (p < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that a novel sensitive assay detects more asymptomatic HD patients compared to previously used methods, being at the same time predictive of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The only independent variable of high hs-cTnI concentrations was a positive history of cardiovascular disease, suggesting a possible role of hs-cTnI in identifying a high-risk subset of patients.

High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays in Clinical Diagnostics of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Nowadays, measurement of cardiac troponins (cTn) in patient plasma is central for diagnosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). High-sensitivity (hs) immunoassays have been developed that can very precisely record slightly elevated and rising plasma concentrations of cTn very early after onset of clinical symptoms. Algorithms integrate measurements of hs-cTn at onset of clinical symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and 1 or 3 h after onset, to rule-in and rule-out AMI patients. More and more point-of-care (POC) cTn assays conquer the diagnostic market, but thorough clinical validation studies are required before potential implementation of such POC tests into hospital settings. This review provides an overview of the technical aspects, as well as diagnostic and prognostic use of cardiac troponins in AMI patients and in the healthy population.

Analytical Concordance of Diverse Point-of-Care and Central Laboratory Troponin I Assays

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 99th percentile cutoffs, used in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, are not standardized across cTnI assays. We compared 3 point-of-care (POC) and 1 central laboratory contemporary cTnI assays against the Abbott high-sensitivity (hs) cTnI to evaluate the analytical concordance and the feasibility of using a single cutoff value for all assays.

METHODS

Fresh blood samples collected from 102 inpatients in the coronary care unit were measured on central laboratory instruments (Beckman Coulter DxI AccuTnI+3 TnI, Abbott Architect hs-TnI) and cTnI POC analyzers (Alere Triage Troponin I, Radiometer AQT90, Abbott i-STAT). Agreement and correlation between the contemporary cTnI assays and hs-cTnI assay were assessed using regression analysis. Proportional bias was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Concordance between the contemporary cTnI and hs-cTnI assays was determined by diagnostic contingency tables at specific cutoffs.

RESULTS

Most POC cTnI assays had excellent correlation with the Abbott hs-cTnI method (r ² = 0.955-0.970) except for Alere Triage (r ² = 0.617), while proportional bias is evident between all cTnI assays. Overall concordance between POC contemporary cTnI assays and hs-cTnI assay was 80% to 90% at their respective 99th percentile cutoffs. The concordance increased to 90% to 95% when a fixed cutoff of 0.03 to 0.05 ng/mL was used across the assays.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates poor analytical concordance between cTnI assays at the 99th percentile and supports the notion of a single clinical decision limit for cTnI and consequently standardization of diagnostic protocols despite the analytical differences among these assays.