51
|
Jaffrézic A, Jardé E, Soulier A, Carrera L, Marengue E, Cailleau A, Le Bot B. Veterinary pharmaceutical contamination in mixed land use watersheds: from agricultural headwater to water monitoring watershed. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2017; 609:992-1000. [PMID: 28783916 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Revised: 07/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/23/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Veterinary pharmaceuticals, widely used in intensive livestock production, may contaminate surface waters. Identifying their sources and pathways in watersheds is difficult because i) most veterinary pharmaceuticals are used in human medicine as well and ii) septic or sewer wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) can release pharmaceuticals into surface water, even in agricultural headwater watersheds. This study aimed to analyze the spatiotemporal variability of animal-specific, mixed-use, and human-specific pharmaceuticals, from agricultural headwaters with intensive livestock production and a WWTP to a watershed used for Water Framework Directive monitoring. Grab sampling was performed during one hydrological year upstream and downstream from a WWTP and at three dates in seven nested watersheds with areas of 1.9-84.1km2. Twenty pharmaceuticals were analyzed. Animal-specific pharmaceuticals were detected at all sampling dates upstream and downstream from the WWTP and at concentrations higher than those of human-specific pharmaceuticals. The predominance of animal-specific and mixed-use pharmaceuticals vs. human-specific pharmaceuticals observed at these sampling points was confirmed at the other sampling points. Animal-specific pharmaceuticals were detected mainly during runoff events and periods of manure spreading. A large percentage of mixed-use pharmaceuticals could come from animal sources, but it was difficult to determine. Mixed-use and human-specific pharmaceuticals predominated in the largest watersheds when runoff decreased. In areas of intensive livestock production, mitigation actions should focus on agricultural headwater watersheds to decrease the number of pathways and the transfer volume of veterinary pharmaceuticals, which can be the main contaminants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Jaffrézic
- UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA, 35000 Rennes, France.
| | - E Jardé
- Geosciences Rennes CNRS UMR 6118, Rennes, France
| | - A Soulier
- UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - L Carrera
- UMR SAS, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, INRA, 35000 Rennes, France
| | | | | | - B Le Bot
- Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique, Rennes, France; Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail, UMR 1085, Rennes, France; Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche en Environnement et Santé, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Vikesland PJ, Pruden A, Alvarez PJJ, Aga D, Bürgmann H, Li XD, Manaia CM, Nambi I, Wigginton K, Zhang T, Zhu YG. Toward a Comprehensive Strategy to Mitigate Dissemination of Environmental Sources of Antibiotic Resistance. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2017; 51:13061-13069. [PMID: 28976743 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a pervasive global health threat. To combat the spread of resistance, it is necessary to consider all possible sources and understand the pathways and mechanisms by which resistance disseminates. Best management practices are urgently needed to provide barriers to the spread of resistance and maximize the lifespan of antibiotics as a precious resource. Herein we advise upon the need for coordinated national and international strategies, highlighting three essential components: (1) Monitoring, (2) Risk Assessment, and (3) Mitigation of antibiotic resistance. Central to all three components is What exactly to monitor, assess, and mitigate? We address this question within an environmental framework, drawing from fundamental microbial ecological processes driving the spread of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Vikesland
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, Virginia United States
- Virginia Tech Global Change Center and Virginia Tech Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, Virginia United States
| | - Amy Pruden
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, Virginia United States
- Virginia Tech Global Change Center and Virginia Tech Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Science, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, Virginia United States
| | - Pedro J J Alvarez
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University , Houston, Texas United States
| | - Diana Aga
- Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo , Buffalo, New York United States
| | - Helmut Bürgmann
- Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology , 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland
| | - Xiang-Dong Li
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University , Hong Kong
| | - Celia M Manaia
- Universidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina - Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia , Rua Arquiteto Lobão Vital, Apartado 2511, 4202-401 Porto, Portugal
| | - Indumathi Nambi
- Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - Madras , Chennai, India
| | - Krista Wigginton
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan United States
| | - Tong Zhang
- Department of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University , Hong Kong
| | - Yong-Guan Zhu
- Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Xiamen 361021, China
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Dungan RS, Snow DD, Bjorneberg DL. Occurrence of Antibiotics in an Agricultural Watershed in South-Central Idaho. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 2017; 46:1455-1461. [PMID: 29293847 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.06.0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The polar organic compound integrative sampler (POCIS) is a tool that has been effectively used to passively sample organic pollutants over long periods in aquatic environments. In this study, POCIS were used to investigate the spatial and temporal occurrence of 21 antibiotics in irrigation return flows and upstream sites of an intensively managed agricultural watershed in south-central Idaho. The antibiotic metabolite, erythromycin-HO, and the antibiotics monensin, oxytetracycline, sulfadimethoxine, sulfamethazine, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and tylosin were detected at frequencies ranging from 3.1 to 62.5%, with monensin having the highest rate of detection. The fact that monensin was the most frequently detected compound indicates that it is entering return flows in runoff from fields that had received livestock manure or wastewater. Antibiotics (except oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine, and tylosin) were also detected at an upstream site that consisted of diverted Snake River water and is the source of irrigation water for the watershed. Therefore, even cropped soils that are not treated with manure are still receiving low-level antibiotics during irrigation events. This study provides the first set of evidence that surface waters within this agricultural watershed contain antibiotic residues associated with veterinary and human uses.
Collapse
|
54
|
Antwis RE, Griffiths SM, Harrison XA, Aranega-Bou P, Arce A, Bettridge AS, Brailsford FL, de Menezes A, Devaynes A, Forbes KM, Fry EL, Goodhead I, Haskell E, Heys C, James C, Johnston SR, Lewis GR, Lewis Z, Macey MC, McCarthy A, McDonald JE, Mejia-Florez NL, O'Brien D, Orland C, Pautasso M, Reid WDK, Robinson HA, Wilson K, Sutherland WJ. Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2017; 93:3098413. [PMID: 28379446 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fix044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbial ecology provides insights into the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of microbial communities underpinning every ecosystem on Earth. Microbial communities can now be investigated in unprecedented detail, although there is still a wealth of open questions to be tackled. Here we identify 50 research questions of fundamental importance to the science or application of microbial ecology, with the intention of summarising the field and bringing focus to new research avenues. Questions are categorised into seven themes: host-microbiome interactions; health and infectious diseases; human health and food security; microbial ecology in a changing world; environmental processes; functional diversity; and evolutionary processes. Many questions recognise that microbes provide an extraordinary array of functional diversity that can be harnessed to solve real-world problems. Our limited knowledge of spatial and temporal variation in microbial diversity and function is also reflected, as is the need to integrate micro- and macro-ecological concepts, and knowledge derived from studies with humans and other diverse organisms. Although not exhaustive, the questions presented are intended to stimulate discussion and provide focus for researchers, funders and policy makers, informing the future research agenda in microbial ecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael E Antwis
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK
| | - Sarah M Griffiths
- School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, Greater Manchester M1 5GD, UK
| | - Xavier A Harrison
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, London NW1 4RY, UK
| | - Paz Aranega-Bou
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK
| | - Andres Arce
- Silwood Park, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Aimee S Bettridge
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 3XQ, UK
| | - Francesca L Brailsford
- School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, UK
| | - Alexandre de Menezes
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK
| | - Andrew Devaynes
- Biosciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK
| | - Kristian M Forbes
- Department of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland
| | - Ellen L Fry
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Ian Goodhead
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK
| | - Erin Haskell
- Department of Biology, University of York, York, North Yorkshire YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Chloe Heys
- Institute of Integrative Biology/School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3BX, UK
| | - Chloe James
- School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, The Crescent, Salford M5 4WT, UK
| | - Sarah R Johnston
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, South Glamorgan CF10 3XQ, UK
| | - Gillian R Lewis
- Biosciences, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 4QP, UK
| | - Zenobia Lewis
- Institute of Integrative Biology/School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3BX, UK
| | - Michael C Macey
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Alan McCarthy
- Institute of Integrative Biology/School of Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside L69 3BX, UK
| | - James E McDonald
- School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, UK
| | | | | | - Chloé Orland
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Marco Pautasso
- Animal and Plant Health Unit, European Food Safety Authority, Parma 43126, Italy
| | - William D K Reid
- School of Biology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Heather A Robinson
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Kenneth Wilson
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4YW, UK
| | - William J Sutherland
- Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1TN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Suresh G, Das RK, Kaur Brar S, Rouissi T, Avalos Ramirez A, Chorfi Y, Godbout S. Alternatives to antibiotics in poultry feed: molecular perspectives. Crit Rev Microbiol 2017; 44:318-335. [DOI: 10.1080/1040841x.2017.1373062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ratul Kumar Das
- INRS-ETE, Université du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
- TERI Deakin Nanobiotechnology Centre, TERI Gram, The Energy and Resources Institute, Gurgaon, India
| | | | | | - Antonio Avalos Ramirez
- Centre National en Électrochimie et en Technologie Environnementales Inc, Shawinigan, Canada
| | - Younes Chorfi
- Département de biomédecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Canada
| | - Stephane Godbout
- Institut de recherche et de développement en agroenvironnement, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Lee YJ, Choi JH, Abd El-Aty AM, Chung HS, Lee HS, Kim SW, Rahman MM, Park BJ, Kim JE, Shin HC, Shim JH. Development of a single-run analytical method for the detection of ten multiclass emerging contaminants in agricultural soil using an acetate-buffered QuEChERS method coupled with LC-MS/MS. J Sep Sci 2016; 40:415-423. [PMID: 27863002 DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201600953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 11/01/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This study was undertaken to develop and validate a single multiresidue method for the monitoring of ten multiclass emerging contaminants, viz. ceftiofur, clopidol, florfenicol, monensin, salinomycin, sulfamethazine, sulfathiazole, sulfamethoxazole, tiamulin, and tylosin in agricultural soil. Samples were extracted using an acetate-buffered, modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method followed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric analysis in positive ion mode. Separation on an Eclipse Plus C18 column was conducted in gradient elution mode using a mobile phase of methanol (A) and distilled water (B), each containing 0.1% formic acid and 5 mM ammonium formate. The linearity of the matrix-matched calibrations, expressed as determination coefficients, was good, with R2 ≥ 0.9908. The limits of quantification were in the range 0.05-10 μg/kg. Blank soil samples spiked with 4 × and 20 × the limit of quantification provided recovery rates of 60.2-120.3% (except sulfamethoxazole spiked at 4 × the limit of quantification, which gave 131.9%) with a relative standard deviation < 13% (except clopidol spiked at 20 × the limit of quantification, which gave 25.2%). This method was successfully applied to the monitoring of 51 field-incurred agricultural loamy-sand soil samples collected from 17 provincial areas throughout the Korean Peninsula. The detected and quantified drugs were clopidol (≤ 4.8 μg/kg), sulfathiazole (≤ 7.7 μg/kg), sulfamethazine (≤ 6.6 μg/kg), tiamulin (≤ 10.0 μg/kg), and tylosin (≤ 5.3 μg/kg). The developed method is simple and versatile, and can be used to monitor various classes of veterinary drugs in soil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Jun Lee
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Heui Choi
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - A M Abd El-Aty
- Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Hyung Suk Chung
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Sol Lee
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Woo Kim
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Md Musfiqur Rahman
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung-Jun Park
- Chemical Safety Division, Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Science, Wanju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang-Eok Kim
- School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Chul Shin
- Department of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Han Shim
- Biotechnology Research Institute, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Buk-gu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|