Assessing medication appropriateness in the elderly: a review of available measures

Repeat prescribing: scale, problems and quality management in ambulatory care patients

The reported scale of repeat prescriptions ranges from 29% to 75% of all items prescribed, depending on the definition of repeat prescribing and other variables. It is likely that a substantial part of repeat prescribing by general practitioners (GPs) occurs without direct doctor-patient contact. While this reduces the workload for the GP and is convenient for the patient, it does not provide the adequate control that is needed to ensure that every repeat prescription is still appropriate, effective and well tolerated, and that it is still being viewed upon and taken by the patient as intended. Infrequent therapy reviews may lead to failure to prevent, identify and solve drug-related problems and drug wastage, and may, thereby, have a negative impact on the effectiveness, safety or cost of the medications prescribed. Studies evaluating the repeat prescribing process have shown that GPs and medical practices vary widely in their degree of administrative and clinical control of repeat prescriptions. Contrary to the opinion that GPs cannot change prescribing behaviour when the prescription is initiated by a medical specialist, GPs have their own responsibility for controlling the repeats of such prescriptions. Intervention studies suggest that a medication review by a pharmacist can help to reduce drug-related problems with repeat prescriptions, and the effectiveness of the intervention may be increased by combining the medication review with a consultation of the patient's medical records and a patient interview. In several studies, such an intervention was relatively inexpensive and, therefore, feasible. However, these conclusions should be viewed with appropriate caution because a number of caveats pertain. There is still no evidence that these types of intervention improve health-related quality of life or reduce healthcare cost, and so far only a few trials have produced any evidence of clinical improvement. As implicit and explicit screening criteria have their own benefits and limitations, a combined application may offer a more thorough assessment but may also be more complex and time consuming. Further studies on the development and evaluation of repeat prescription management models are needed, preferably focussing on improving clinical, humanistic and economic outcomes. New studies should investigate the effects of: different types of interventions; different organisational models; different target populations; and selecting and training different types of healthcare professionals. Future studies should also assess whether results are sustained, the optimal time interval between reviews of repeat prescriptions, and the possibilities offered by new computerised support technologies.

Prescribing indicators for evaluating drug use in nursing homes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate drug use in 2 Dutch nursing homes (254 residents) by developing and evaluating prescribing indicators based on pharmacy prescription data.

METHODS

We evaluated the prescribing of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), ulcer-healing drugs, and diuretics. Prescribing indicators were used to identify prescribing that was potentially not in line with recommendations in national and regional prescribing guidelines. We used both descriptive indicators, such as the number and percentage of users, and indicators reflecting potentially suboptimal prescribing, such as use of drugs outside the regional drug formulary, use of >1 drug from the same drug class, and prescription of drug dosages above recommended values. When potentially suboptimal prescribing was found, we verified the findings by means of an interview with 1 of the prescribers.

RESULTS

The prescribing indicators we assessed were generally in agreement with national and regional guidelines. However, prescribing of NSAIDs without concomitant prescribing of gastroprotective drugs was found in a relatively high number of patients. After prescriber interview and patient chart review, it was found that some prescribing indicators, such as dosages above recommended values, were not always indicative for suboptimal prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed that prescribing indicators based solely on pharmacy prescription data can be a useful tool to evaluate drug prescribing. With some of these prescribing indicators, we identified cases of potentially suboptimal prescribing. However, with other indicators such as those based on drug dosages, we could not identify suboptimal prescribing, and clinical information from the prescriber was necessary to get insight into the appropriateness of prescribing.

Multidisciplinary medication review in nursing home residents: what are the most significant drug-related problems? The Bergen District Nursing Home (BEDNURS) study

AIM

Based on a multidisciplinary review of drug use in nursing home residents, this study aimed to identify the most frequent clinically relevant medication problems and to analyse them according to the drugs involved and types of problems.

METHODS

Cross sectional study auditing drug use by 1354 residents in 23 nursing homes in Bergen, Norway. Data were collected in 1997. A physician/pharmacist panel performed a comprehensive medication review with regard to indications for drug use and active medical conditions. The drug related problems were subsequently classified according to the drugs involved and types of problems (indication, effectiveness, and safety issues).

RESULTS

2445 potential medication problems were identified in 1036 (76%) residents. Psychoactive drugs accounted for 38% of all problems; antipsychotics were the class most often involved. Multiple psychoactive drug use was considered particularly problematic. Potential medication problems were most frequently classified as risk of adverse drug reactions (26%), inappropriate drug choice for indication (20%), and underuse of beneficial treatment (13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Three of four nursing home residents had clinically relevant medication problems, most of which were accounted for by psychoactive drugs. The most frequent concerns were related to adverse drug reactions, drug choice, and probable undertreatment.

Reliability of a Modified Medication Appropriateness Index in Community Pharmacies

Background

The medication appropriateness index (MAI) has demonstrated reliability in selected outpatient clinics where medical data were easily accessible from medical charts. However, its use in the community setting where patient data may be limited has not been examined.

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of a modified MAI for use in the community pharmacy setting by testing interrater reliability using 3 different rating schemes.

Methods

Two raters evaluated 160 medications for 32 elderly ambulatory patients. Patient information was acquired using community pharmacist-collected medication histories. A summated MAI score, percent agreement, κ, positive agreement, negative agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for each criterion using 3 scoring schemes. A paired samples t-test (95% CI) was used to test interrater reliability.

Results

The κ statistics were >0.75 for indication and effectiveness, but good (0.41–0.66) for the remaining criteria using the Hanlon scoring scheme. The intraclass coefficients (0.82, 0.86, 0.87) and overall κ (0.65, 0.66, 0.61) were similar for the 3 schemes.

Conclusions

This study suggests that the modified MAI has the potential to detect medication appropriateness and inappropriateness in the community pharmacy setting; however, it is not without limitations. Because the MAI has the most clinimetric and psychometric data available, the instrument should be studied further to increase its reliability and generalizability.

Inappropriate prescribing before and after nursing home admission

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing before and after nursing home admission and to determine which patient and physician characteristics are associated with inappropriate prescribing in the nursing home setting.

DESIGN

A pre/post retrospective, cohort study.

SETTING

All licensed nursing homes in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen thousand nine hundred eleven individuals aged 66 and older, newly admitted to nursing homes in Ontario between April 1, 1997, and March 31, 1999.

MEASUREMENTS

For each patient in the cohort, a subset of the Beers criteria was used to characterize and compare the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing (as indicated by the prescription of one of 49 inappropriate drugs) before and after nursing home admission. A logistic regression model was used to study the association between inappropriate prescribing and patient and physician characteristics.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients receiving a prescription for at least one inappropriate drug decreased from 25.4% before nursing home admission to 20.8% afterward (P <.001). Most patients who had been prescribed an inappropriate agent before nursing home entry had that agent discontinued after admission. The most commonly prescribed inappropriate drugs after nursing home admission were strongly anticholinergic antidepressants (6.4%) and long-half-life benzodiazepines (5.9%). Patients younger than 85 were more likely to receive inappropriate drug therapy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.15-1.35) than those aged 85 and older. Other significant predictors were having more than one prescriber (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.29-1.51), having a physician aged 50 or older (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05-1.23), having a male physician (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.05-1.37), having a nonspecialist physician (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.49), having a nonurban physician (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.03-1.24), and having a physician practicing outside the greater Ontario metropolitan area (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a substantial number of nursing home residents receive inappropriate drug therapy, the prevalence of inappropriate prescriptions in our cohort declined after nursing home admission despite an overall increase in drug use. Patient and physician characteristics were associated with inappropriate prescribing. Targeted interventions such as regionally based education programs or drug use restrictions may reduce the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing.

Patients with eventually fatal chronic illness: their importance within a national research agenda on improving patient safety and reducing medical errors

In September 2000, the Quality Interagency Coordination (QuIC) Task Force invited the RAND Center to Improve Care of the Dying and Americans for Better Care of the Dying to testify at its National Summit on Medical Errors and Patient Safety Research. In their testimony, the organizations urged the QuIC to consider the special vulnerability and needs of individuals at the end of life in crafting their research agenda. Patients at the end of life are particularly vulnerable to medical errors and other lapses in patient safety for three reasons: (1) substantially increased exposure to medical errors; (2) more serious effects from errors because they cannot protect themselves from risks and have less reserve with which to overcome the effects; and (3) pervasive patterns of care that run counter to well-substantiated evidence-based practices. A national research agenda on preventing medical errors and increasing patient safety must include a focus on how to improve shortcomings affecting these vulnerable patients. The QuIC's preliminary research agenda, released in October 2000, included patients coming to the end of life. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the lead federal agency for researching patient safety and medical errors, released between November 2000 and April 2001 six Requests for Applications for research into medical errors.

Impact of inappropriate drug use on mortality and functional status in representative community dwelling elders

BACKGROUND

The predictive validity of Drug Utilization Review (DUR) and drugs-to-avoid criteria in elders is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between use of inappropriate drugs as determined by these explicit criteria and mortality and decline in functional status in community dwelling elders.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Cohort study.

SUBJECTS

The fourth wave (3234 participants) of the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly.

MEASURES

Two sets of inappropriate drug-use criteria: (1) DUR with respect to dosage, duplication, drug-drug interactions, duration, and drug-disease interactions; and (2) Beers-modified criteria regarding drugs-to-avoid were applied to drug use reported in an in-home interview. Death was identified from the National Death Index; change in four functional status measures (basic self-care, intermediate self-care, complex self-management, physical function) was determined during the following 3 years.

RESULTS

Use of inappropriate drugs identified by either set of criteria was not significantly associated with mortality. The drugs-to-avoid criteria identified no significant associations between use of these drugs and decline in functional status. With DUR criteria, however, the association between use of inappropriate drugs and basic self-care was significant and pronounced among those with drug-drug or drug-disease interaction problems (Adj. OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.32-3.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying the impact of inappropriate drug use may depend on the criteria applied. Further studies are needed that measure additional outcomes and use alternate measures of inappropriate drug use.