51
|
Dayan J, Yoshida K. Thérapeutique des troubles anxieux et dépressifs de la grossesse et du post-partum. Revue et synthèse. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 36:530-48. [PMID: 17616265 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2007] [Accepted: 06/01/2007] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this article is to review the main methods of treatment of anxious and depressive disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum. To this end, we analyse recent publications about the use and efficacy of psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions (cognitive behavioural therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychoanalytical therapy) in the perinatal period. We also review recent papers about the use of psychotropic medication during pregnancy and breast-feeding, with special emphasis on clinical trials. We particularly focus on the risk/benefit assessment of antidepressants, mood stabilisers, antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, in terms of teratogenicity, and impact on neonatal adaptation and neuropsychological development. Various treatment modalities are presented and discussed. It appears that psychotherapies have proved their efficiency on most pre- and postpartum anxious and depressive disorders and represent a first line treatment in most cases. Psychopharmacological treatment is indicated for severe anxious and depressive disorders. The risks of such medication, especially antidepressants, may have been overestimated in the past. Provided reasonable precautions are taken and mothers and future mothers receive clear information on the potential risks and benefits, psychotropic medication could be more broadly prescribed during pregnancy and the breast-feeding period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Dayan
- Unité de psychiatrie périnatale, service de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, CHU de Caen, avenue Clémenceau, 14033 Caen cedex, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
52
|
Gentile S, Rossi A, Bellantuono C. SSRIs during breastfeeding: spotlight on milk-to-plasma ratio. Arch Womens Ment Health 2007; 10:39-51. [PMID: 17294355 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-007-0173-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2006] [Accepted: 01/13/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the usefulness of the milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratio for assessing the risks for the breastfed infant associated with the maternal use of SSRIs. DATA SOURCES Medline, Toxnet, Embase, Current Contents, and PsycInfo indexed articles from 1980 to September 2006. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION All studies reporting the M/P ratio in mothers taking SSRIs while breastfeeding or studies which such an information could be calculated from data reported in the article. DATA SYNTHESIS Higher M/P ratios were rarely associated with a clinically significant impact on the babies during the early phases of breastfeeding. CONCLUSIONS So far no evidence-based information seems to support the hypothesis that SSRIs characterized by a M/P ratio <1.0 should be preferred. Hence, physicians should consider different parameters when attempting to choose the safest SSRI for the breastfeeding woman. These parameters might be represented by the number of well-documented published adverse event reports and the tendency of each SSRI of inducing in the infants serum concentrations that are elevated above 10% of average maternal serum levels. In any case, if the mother wishes to breastfeed her infant while taking a SSRI, the baby should be closely monitored in order to promptly detect any iatrogenic event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gentile
- Department of Mental Health ASL Salerno 1, Mental Health Center n.4, Cava de' Tirreni (Salerno), Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
53
|
Abstract
There are a growing number of concerns about the utilization of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) in late pregnancy and the onset of perinatal complications. This review aimed to analyze and summarize the studies evaluating the risk of perinatal complications (such as low birth weight, preterm delivery, withdrawal or toxic phenomena, and other detrimental events/poor neonatal outcomes) related to maternal SRI use in late pregnancy. A computerized search of MEDLINE (1966-January 2007) and PsycINFO (1974-January 2007) databases was performed. Articles describing perinatal complications after late in utero exposure to SRIs were selected and also reviewed for additional references. Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria. Exposure to SRIs late in pregnancy is clearly associated with an increased risk of infants developing a constellation of symptoms, including CNS and respiratory effects, often requiring close infant observation and supportive or specific treatment in intensive care units. Such symptoms are not always due to toxic or withdrawal reactions. Indeed, some evidence suggests that SRIs may interfere with the physiology of the respiratory system and parasympathetic activity in neonates. Of the most methodologically relevant studies reviewed, 50% have been published in the last 3 years. Hence, it is possible that further concerning data will become available in the future. For these reasons, the opportunity of tapering and discontinuing SRIs in late pregnancy should be taken into consideration, although to date the evidence to support such a clinical decision is preliminary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Gentile
- Department of Mental Health ASL Salerno 1, Mental Health Center n.4, Cava de' Tirreni (Salerno), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Bellantuono C, Migliarese G, Gentile S. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and the risk of major malformations: a systematic review. Hum Psychopharmacol 2007; 22:121-8. [PMID: 17397101 DOI: 10.1002/hup.836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review studies conducted to establish the risk of major congenital malformations in women exposed to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) during the first trimester of pregnancy. METHODS A literature search [corrected] was conducted within PsycINFO [corrected] EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases from 1966 to October 2006, to identify studies assessing the risk of major malformations in infants whose mother was taking SRIs (SSRIs and SNRIs) during the first trimester of pregnancy. RESULTS Fifteen studies were selected for the analysis: seven adopted a prospective cohort design and seven a retrospective design, of these one was a case-control study. DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS The reviewed studies suggest that exposure to fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram and venlafaxine in early pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations. For paroxetine, recent data call for caution in prescribing such a drug in early pregnancy. For the other SRIs, the risk remains substantially undetermined, as data are so far scanty. Given this background, large prospective cohort studies are urgently needed to better assess the risk/benefit ratio of SRIs-treatment during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesario Bellantuono
- Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Verona, Ospedale-Policlinico G. Rossi, Piazzale L. Scuro., Verona, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
55
|
Abstract
Despite the well known severe repercussions of maternal depression on infants' well being, women are often reluctant to seek pharmacological treatment for postnatal depression. The fear of adverse events for the suckling infant plays an important role in such maternal considerations. However, the pharmacological approach to mood disorders at postpartum onset often represents one of the most realistic options in a number of clinical conditions. Therefore, the necessity exists to establish the safety of antidepressant treatment in the breastfed infant. For this reason, the aim of this article is to propose a specific safety index that assesses the frequency and degree of severity of adverse events in infants associated with maternal treatment with second-generation antidepressants during puerperium. The index is derived from a simple formula that uses the number of reports of adverse events in infants exposed to antidepressants as the numerator and the combined total of reports of healthy outcomes and reports of adverse events as the denominator. The sum is then multiplied by 100. A value of < or =2 indicates that the drug should be relatively safe for use during breastfeeding, a value of 2.1-10 indicates that the drug should be used with great caution and a value >10 indicates that the drug should be contraindicated in breastfeeding mothers. In addition to the figure created by this calculation, each drug will also be assigned a letter or the combination of a letter and a subscripted number to symbolise, respectively, the type and clinical management of the most serious recorded event. At this early developmental stage of the index, a complete classification of contemporary antidepressants regarding their safety in infants nursed to the breast is unfeasible. Indeed, because of the lack of suitable published data, so far the index has been limited to the evaluation of four antidepressants. In accordance with the index classification for these four antidepressants, sertraline and paroxetine should be considered as first-line medications in women who need to start antidepressant treatment during the postpartum period and wish to continue breastfeeding. The utilisation of fluoxetine and citalopram seems conversely to be associated with a relatively higher risk of adverse events (with a low degree of severity, however). For the other newer antidepressant drugs, the index is still of no assistance to the patient or physician in deciding on the safety of their use in lactation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Gentile
- Department of Mental Health ASL Salerno 1, Mental Health Center n. 4, Cava de' Tirreni, Salerno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Bethea TC, Sikich L. Early pharmacological treatment of autism: a rationale for developmental treatment. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61:521-37. [PMID: 17276749 PMCID: PMC2553755 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2006] [Revised: 09/02/2006] [Accepted: 09/24/2006] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Autism is a dynamic neurodevelopmental syndrome in which disabilities emerge during the first three postnatal years and continue to evolve with ongoing development. We briefly review research in autism describing subtle changes in molecules important in brain development and neurotransmission, in morphology of specific neurons, brain connections, and in brain size. We then provide a general schema of how these processes may interact with particular emphasis on neurotransmission. In this context, we present a rationale for utilizing pharmacologic treatments aimed at modifying key neurodevelopmental processes in young children with autism. Early treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is presented as a model for pharmacologic interventions because there is evidence in autistic children for reduced brain serotonin synthesis during periods of peak synaptogenesis; serotonin is known to enhance synapse refinement; and exploratory studies with these agents in autistic children exist. Additional hypothetical developmental interventions and relevant published clinical data are described. Finally, we discuss the importance of exploring early pharmacologic interventions within multiple experimental settings in order to develop effective treatments as quickly as possible while minimizing risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terrence C Bethea
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
57
|
Affiliation(s)
- Vivette Glover
- Perinatal Psychobiology, Imperial College London, Wolfson and Weston Research Centre for Family Health, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Hammersmith Campus
| | - Thomas O'Connor
- Psychiatry and Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
|
59
|
|
60
|
Ververs T, Kaasenbrood H, Visser G, Schobben F, de Jong-van den Berg L, Egberts T. Prevalence and patterns of antidepressant drug use during pregnancy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 62:863-70. [PMID: 16896784 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-006-0177-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2006] [Accepted: 06/19/2006] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the extent and patterns of antidepressant use before, during and after pregnancy in a large population in The Netherlands. METHODS Health care records and prescription data from one of the largest Dutch health insurance companies were analysed. The study cohort consisted of 29,005 women who had live births in the period between January 2000 and July 2003. Antidepressant drug use during a specified period was defined as there being a record of a prescription during that period. RESULTS During the first trimester of pregnancy 2% of all pregnant women of the study cohort were found to have taken antidepressants; in the second and third trimesters, this figure had dropped to 1.8% of all pregnancies. Antidepressant use before as well as during pregnancy was almost twofold higher in women over 35 years of age than in those under 35 years. Almost 60% of the women who used antidepressants before pregnancy stopped taking them in the first trimester, and a smaller number stopped thereafter. Of all women using antidepressants during pregnancy, one third started this medication during gestation. In the 3 months following delivery, the prevalence of antidepressant use was the same as before pregnancy (2.9%). There was no shift to benzodiazepines in the group of women who stopped taking antidepressants during pregnancy. Although paroxetine and fluoxetine were the most frequently used antidepressants among the study group, all modern antidepressants were used. CONCLUSION A considerable number of women are being exposed to antidepressants throughout pregnancy up until delivery. One consequence of this is that their newborns need special care and supervision during the first days of life. However, women who stop taking the medication may risk a relapse of their illness, and this may also have a negative effect on the child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Ververs
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
61
|
Gentile S. Prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder in pregnancy and breastfeeding: focus on emerging mood stabilizers. Bipolar Disord 2006; 8:207-20. [PMID: 16696822 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00295.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Bipolar disorders are reported to have a high incidence during childbearing years and the need may arise to start or continue a pharmacological treatment during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In the last few years several investigations have evaluated the efficacy of emerging mood-stabilizing agents in the treatment of bipolar disorders, such as lamotrigine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole and ziprasidone. A number of studies, which examined the use of oxcarbazepine, point to its potential usefulness in prophylactic treatment. The aim of this review is to compare information from the literature on the safety of lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine to the safety data on classic mood stabilizers during pregnancy and the postpartum period. METHODS A computerized search carried out from 1980 to April 5, 2006 led to the summarization of the results. (References were updated after acceptance and prior to publication.) RESULTS Emerging mood stabilizers show uncertain safety parameters in pregnancy and lactation. Limited information on lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine does not suggest a clear increase in teratogenicity, while olanzapine appears to be associated with a higher risk of metabolic complications in pregnant women. Data about risperidone and quetiapine are still inconclusive. Finally, the literature on the safety of these compounds in breastfeeding is anecdotal. CONCLUSIONS Untreated pregnant bipolar women are at an increased risk of poor obstetrical outcomes and relapse of affective symptoms. On the other hand, classic antiepileptic drugs are well-known human teratogens, whereas data on lithium are partially ambiguous. The safety of emerging mood stabilizers in pregnancy and breastfeeding has not been examined extensively. Therefore, when approaching bipolar disorder, if possible, each episode must be considered separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Gentile
- Department of Mental Health ASL Salerno 1, Operative Unit District n 4, Salerno, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Gentile S. Quetiapine-fluvoxamine combination during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. Arch Womens Ment Health 2006; 9:158-9. [PMID: 16683078 DOI: 10.1007/s00737-006-0126-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2005] [Accepted: 03/17/2006] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
63
|
&NA;. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy and breastfeeding has both benefits and risks. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2006. [DOI: 10.2165/00042310-200622030-00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
64
|
Malm H, Klaukka T, Neuvonen PJ. Risks associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 106:1289-96. [PMID: 16319254 DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000187302.61812.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 150] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on pregnancy outcome. METHODS We performed a population-based study of women exposed to SSRIs during pregnancy (n = 1782). Data were derived from a national project in Finland, established by 3 governmental organizations. In that project, the Drug Reimbursement Register, the Medical Birth Register, the Register of Congenital Malformations, and the Register of Induced Abortions have been linked. Comparisons were made between women with SSRI purchases to matched controls and between women with purchases in different trimesters. Only singleton pregnancies were included. Primary outcomes were major malformations, preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, and treatment in neonatal special or intensive care unit. Analyses were based on logistic models. RESULTS Major malformations were not more common in infants or fetuses of women with first trimester SSRI purchases (n = 1,398) when compared with controls with no drug purchases (P = .4). Of infants born to mothers with SSRI purchases in the 3rd trimester, 15.7% were treated in special or intensive care unit compared with 11.2% of infants exposed only during the 1st trimester (P = .009, adjusted odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2). We found no increased risk of preterm birth (< 37 weeks), birth 32 weeks of gestation or less, small for gestational age, or low birth weight in women with purchases in each trimester or during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters when compared with women with only 1st trimester purchases. CONCLUSION Use of SSRIs during pregnancy is not independently associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome other than need for treatment in neonatal special or intensive care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heli Malm
- Teratology Information Service, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
65
|
Current awareness: Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006. [DOI: 10.1002/pds.1175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
66
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to assess and summarize the existing literature data about the efficacy of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in preventing and treating postpartum psychiatric disorders. METHODS An extensive and unrestrictive computerized search (from 1970 to June 2005) on MEDLINE/PubMed, TOXNET, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases was conducted with the following search terms: estradiol, estrogen-treatment, hormonal treatment, therapy, postpartum depression, postnatal depression, puerperal depression, postpartum blues, postpartum psychosis, lactation, and breastfeeding. RESULTS In assessing available literature information about the role of ERT in preventing and treating puerperal psychiatric diseases, all reviewed studies were found to suffer from severe methodological limitations. CONCLUSION Well-designed and strictly focused multicenter trials are warranted in order to firmly establish the effectiveness of ERT in puerperal psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Gentile
- Mental Health Center, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Salerno Number 1, Nocera Inferiore, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|