Neuroleptic malignant syndrome associated with atypical antipsychotic drugs

Olanzepine-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a case of multiple sclerosis

Suspicion of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a frequent cause of emergent psychiatric consultation. Despite early recognition, NMS has remained a syndrome that causes high rates of morbidity and mortality. A 25-year-old male with multiple sclerosis presented to the accident and emergency department and E with ataxia. He was started on steroids. On the third day, he became tearful and anxious. A diagnosis of multiple sclerosis-induced psychosis was made and he was started on olanzepine 2.5 mg BD. On the sixth day the patient was tachypneic and had tachycardia. Temperature recorded in the axilla was 45°C. Patient was intubated and electively ventilated. A diagnosis of NMS was made and treated accordingly. This case report highlights the importance of recognizing and treating NMS in a patient on anti-psychotics.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome induced by lamotrigine

This case report describes a 54-year-old man with bipolar I disorder who was treated with aripiprazole (ARP) and lithium. The patient was admitted to our hospital because of aggravation of depressive symptoms, and treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) was initiated. Two weeks after admission, we discontinued administration of ARP after the appearance of a tremor. Three weeks after discontinuing ARP, the patient developed a high fever, rigidity of the arms, diarrhea, dysphagia, and diaphoresis. We suspected these symptoms were consistent with neuroleptic malignant syndrome and therefore removed the application of LTG. After 2 days, most of the patient's symptoms and blood results had improved, leading us to conclude that the LTG treatment had induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Thus, the purpose of this case report was to warn psychiatrists against therapy with LTG, as it may be conducive to neuroleptic malignant syndrome.

Olanzapine-induced neuroleptic malignant syndrome in a patient with bipolar affective disorder: Does quetiapine holds the solution?

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) is a rare, severe and life threatening condition induced by antipsychotic medications. It is commonly encountered with the use of first generation antipsychotics, however cases of NMS have been reported with the use of second generation antipsychotics like Olanzapine, Risperidone, Paliperidone, Aripiprazole, Ziprasidone, Amisulpride, Quetiapine and Clozapine, though the incidence of such reports is rare. Due to decreased use of first generation antipsychotics, NMS is reported less frequently now a days. In this case report- we highlight the management issues of a patient suffering from bipolar affective disorder, who had developed NMS following intramuscular injection of haloperidol, which was withdrawn and olanzapine was given later on. The patient had again developed NMS with olanzapine. Finally the patient was managed with modified electroconvulsive therapy and discharged on Lithium carbonate and Quetiapine.

[Acute catatonia: Questions, diagnosis and prognostics, and the place of atypical antipsychotics]

INTRODUCTION

Acute catatonia is a non-specific, relatively frequent syndrome, which manifests itself through characteristic motor signs that enables its diagnosis. It occurs in association with mood disorders, psychotic disorders and several somatic or toxic diseases. Its short-term prognosis is of paramount importance. Without effective treatment, it is associated with high mortality. Despite the vital risk inherent in this disorder, it is not recognized as an independent diagnostic category by international rankings, which makes its diagnostic detection difficult and consequently does not allow adequate therapeutic care. However, if benzodiazepines and electroconvulsive therapy have proved effective in the treatment of acute catatonia, the role of atypical antipsychotics remains controversial. In fact, despite the progress made by the DSM-IV-TR and CIM 10 by the recognition of the etiologic diversity of catatonia, we deplore the absence to date of a consensus on clinical management and therapy of catatonia, which constitutes a source of confusion for practitioners in their approach to catatonic patients. To illustrate the difficulty in supporting these patients, we report here a clinical vignette.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Mr. M. aged 21, without psychiatric history, has shown a functional acute psychotic episode involving a delirious and hallucinatory syndrome associated with a marked catatonic dimension. Olanzapine was initiated at a dose of 10mg/d on the nineth day of hospitalization; the clinical picture was complicated by a malignant catatonia justifying the halt of olanzapine and the institution, in intensive units, of 15mg per day of lorazepam. After 72hours, the patient has not responded to this treatment. ECT was expected, but the patient died on the 12th day.

DISCUSSION

This case raises a threefold question: the crucial issue of immediate vital prognosis, that of the truthfulness of the positive diagnosis of this psychotic table and finally the issue of therapeutic care, primarily the well-founded or otherwise use of an atypical antipsychotic for the treatment of this type of psychotic disorder. For Mr. M., the clinical diagnosis that he has shown, according to the DSM IV-TR, is brief psychotic disorder "temporary diagnosis". This diagnosis - brief psychotic disorder - does not actually allow for a specific clinical approach to this type of psychotic table. The immediate vital prognosis inherent in the catatonic dimension may not be properly evaluated and the therapeutic conduct may miss the application of the specific treatment of the catatonic syndrome. The proper diagnosis for this type of psychotic disorder would be "catatonia" as proposed by Taylor and Fink, instead of "brief psychotic disorder" if the international rankings have included this disorder as a separate and independent diagnosis. The identification by international rankings of the catatonic syndrome as an independent diagnostic category seems essential for clinicians to allow: its clinical detection, the establishment of a syndromic diagnosis of catatonic disorder, appropriate prognostic evaluation and finally, the application of a suitable therapeutic strategy. Conventional treatment, benzodiazepine- and/or ECT-based, can solve the catatonic episode in a few days, irrespective of its etiology and its severity. Moreover, while all authors agree that conventional antipsychotics may induce a catatonic state or worsen a preexisting catatonia into a malignant catatonia and should thus be avoided for catatonic patients or with prior catatonic episodes, recent data from the literature emphasize the frequent and successful use of atypical antipsychotics, including olanzapine, in various clinical forms of benign catatonia. However, our patient did not respond to treatment with olanzapine and got even more complicated. Was the malignant catatonia that this patient has shown induced by olanzapine ? The answer to this question seems difficult since some authors report the efficacy of olanzapine in malignant catatonia. We wonder if we should have kept olanzapine and strengthen its dosage like Cassidy et al. in 2001 and Suzuki et al. in 2010 for the treatment of the malignant form constituted in this patient rather than having stopped it and used lorazepam as indicated by Taylor and Fink in 2003.

IN CONCLUSION

The non-recognition of catatonia as an independent entity, the lack of a therapeutic consensus and the pending issue on the safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia are at the origin of the difficulties of therapeutic support of catatonic patients.

Comparison of neuroleptic malignant syndrome induced by first- and second-generation antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Reports of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) induced by second-generation antipsychotic drugs highlight a propensity for atypical clinical presentations.

AIMS

To systematically compare the clinical profile of NMS induced by first- (1G-NMS) and second-generation antipsychotic drugs (2G-NMS).

METHOD

The Australian Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (ADRAC) database was searched to identify individuals with NMS reported between April 1994 and September 2010. The clinical characteristics of 208 people with NMS induced by monotherapy with first- or second-generation antipsychotic drugs, as well as presenting features of NMS, were compared.

RESULTS

The individuals with 2G-NMS were younger and more likely to have a psychotic disorder diagnosis. The features of NMS in the two groups were very similar, except that people with 2G-NMS were less likely to present with rigidity or extrapyramidal signs compared with those with 1G-NMS. This difference was due to the lower rates of rigidity in those with clozapine-induced NMS. Mortality was considerably lower for those with 2G-NMS (3.0%) compared with 1G-NMS (16.3%), and the former were more likely to have received supportive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical profile of 2G-NMS is largely similar to 1G-NMS, with clozapine-induced NMS being differentiated by the relative lack of rigidity as a feature. Mortality is lower for 2G-NMS.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Movement disorders emergencies: a review

Movement disorders (MD) encompass acute and chronic diseases characterized by involuntary movements and/or loss of control or efficiency in voluntary movements. In this review, we covered situations in which the main manifestations are MDs that pose significant risks for acute morbidity and mortality. The authors examine literature data on the most relevant MD emergencies, including those related to Parkinson's disease, acute drug reactions (acute dystonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, serotonergic syndrome and malignant hyperthermia), acute exacerbation of chronic MD (status dystonicus), hemiballism and stiff-person syndrome, highlighting clinical presentation, demographics, diagnosis and management.

Toxicology and overdose of atypical antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Second-generation antipsychotic medications, or "atypical antipsychotics," are now first-line therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, and are additionally being used in a wide array of other psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions in both adults and children. Overdose is frequently reported to poison control centers.

OBJECTIVES

We review the toxicology and general management of poisonings involving the atypical antipsychotic medications.

DISCUSSION

The most serious toxicity involves the cardiovascular system and the central nervous system. All typical and atypical antipsychotics cause sedation, which is pronounced in overdose. The most common cardiovascular effects that occur after atypical antipsychotic overdose are tachycardia, mild hypotension, and prolongation of the QTc interval. Other clinical syndromes in overdose include neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) and antimuscarinic delirium. Seizures may be observed. No antidotes exist for these poisonings, but they most often do well with supportive care.

CONCLUSION

Antipsychotic overdose produces a gamut of manifestations that affect multiple organ systems. Treatment is primarily supportive. Specific therapies for NMS, hypotension, and seizures are discussed.

Maintenance Treatment of Bipolar Disorder with Ziprasidone in Adjunctive Use with Lithium or Valproate

Ziprasidone is a second generation (“atypical”) antipsychotic drug that has been used alone and as an adjunct to standard mood stabilizers to reduce recurrence rates in bipolar disorder. Approval of ziprasidone as an adjunct to lithium or valproate in 2009 was based on an industry sponsored study of 584 outpatients with a current or recent manic episode; 240 of these subjects were randomized to adjunctive ziprasidone or placebo and 138 completed a six month trial. Patients enrolled in maintenance studies did not have refractory mood disorders, comorbid conditions or risk of dangerousness. Maintenance ziprasidone augmentation is an option for patients who do not respond to a single mood stabilizer rapidly, and possibly for those with residual psychotic symptoms, but there are insufficient data to prefer this approach to combinations of mood stabilizers or augmentation with other agents. Ziprasidone is generally well tolerated, with less sedation and weight gain than many other antipsychotic drugs; it should be taken with food. Primary interactions of concern are with other serotonergic medications, MAO inhibitors, and other medications that prolong the QT interval.

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially fatal adverse event associated with the use of antipsychotics (AP). The objective of this study was to investigate the profile of cases of NMS and to compare our findings with those published in similar settings. A series of 18 consecutive patients with an established diagnosis of NMS was analyzed, gathering data on demography, symptoms and signs. Two thirds of all cases involved woman with a past medical history of psychiatric disorder receiving relatively high doses of AP. The signs and symptoms of NMS episodes were similar to those reported in other series and only one case had a fatal outcome, the remaining presenting complete recovery. As expected, more than two thirds of our cases were using classic AP (68%), however the clinical profile of these in comparison with those taking newer agent was similar. Newer AP also carry the potential for NMS.

Increased risks of acute organ dysfunction and mortality in intensive care unit patients with schizophrenia: a nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risks of acute organ dysfunction and death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Using a retrospective matched cohort design, we compared 203 schizophrenic patients to 2036 demographically matched (1:10) nonschizophrenic patients with first-time ICU admission between 2005 and 2007 using the claims data of a nationally representative cohort from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Definitions of schizophrenia and associated diagnoses were based on the codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median age of schizophrenic patients was 53 years; 61.1% were men. Schizophrenic patients were less likely to be hospitalized in a medical center and had fewer surgical conditions and principal cardiovascular diagnoses, but they had a higher prevalence of infection than nonschizophrenic patients. After controlling for the aforementioned baseline covariates, schizophrenic patients had a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.09-2.10). When individual organ systems were analyzed, they had a 47% higher risk of respiratory dysfunction, a 194% higher risk of renal dysfunction, and a 122% higher risk of neurological dysfunction than nonschizophrenic patients. Hospital mortality was also higher in schizophrenic patients than in nonschizophrenic patients (24.1% versus 14.4%, p < .001; adjusted odds ratio = 1.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.08-2.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Among ICU patients, schizophrenic patients were sicker, having a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction and death.

Oral paliperidone: a review of its use in the management of schizoaffective disorder

Oral paliperidone extended or prolonged release (Invega®) is an atypical antipsychotic, and is the first agent approved for the treatment of schizoaffective disorder. Paliperidone (or 9-hydroxyrisperidone) is the major active metabolite of the well known atypical antipsychotic risperidone, and its mechanism of action is thought to be the antagonism of dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors. The clinical efficacy of paliperidone was demonstrated in two 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trials in patients with schizoaffective disorder. One trial was flexible dose in design (3-12 mg/day) and the other was fixed dose in design (3-6 and 9-12 mg/day). Compared with placebo, the change from baseline at study end in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with paliperidone 3-12 mg/day in one trial and with 9-12 mg/day (but not 3-6 mg/day) in the other trial. However, pooled analyses reported a significantly greater change in PANSS total score across all paliperidone dosages than with placebo. Paliperidone was generally well tolerated in the 6-week trials, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, tremor, dizziness, insomnia, nausea, akathisia, dyspepsia, hypertonia, somnolence and sedation. Although long-term efficacy and tolerability data and comparisons with other antipsychotics are needed, paliperidone appears to be a useful agent for the short-term management of patients with schizoaffective disorder.

Clinical utility of the risperidone formulations in the management of schizophrenia

Risperidone is one of the early second-generation antipsychotics that came into the limelight in the early 1990s. Both the oral and long-acting injectable formulations have been subject to numerous studies to assess their safety, efficacy, and tolerability. Risperidone is currently one of the most widely prescribed antipsychotic medications, used for both acute and long-term maintenance in schizophrenia. Risperidone has better efficacy in the treatment of psychotic symptoms than placebo and possibly many first-generation antipsychotics. Risperidone fares better than placebo and first-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms. Risperidone's long acting injectable preparation has been well tolerated and is often useful in patients with medication nonadherence. Risperidone has a higher risk of hyperprolactinemia comparable to first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) but fares better than many second-generation antipsychotics with regards to metabolic side effects. In this article, we briefly review the recent literature exploring the role of risperidone formulations in schizophrenia, discuss clinical usage, and highlight the controversies and challenges associated with its use.

Adverse drug reactions resulting in hyperthermia in the intensive care unit

Hyperthermia is frequently seen in the intensive care setting and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is often initially misdiagnosed as fever associated with infection. Atypical presentations of classic syndromes are common. Clinical suspicion is the key to diagnosis. Adverse drug reactions are a frequent culprit. Syndromes include adrenergic "fever," anticholinergic "fever," antidopaminergic "fever," serotonin syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, and withdrawal from baclofen. This review describes the pathophysiology of hyperthermia, as distinct from fever, and the physiology, diagnosis, and treatment of serotonin syndrome, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, malignant hyperthermia, and baclofen withdrawal. Much of the available evidence regarding the treatment of these disorders is based on single case reports, case series, or animal models. Therapeutic modalities consist of identification/withdrawal of possible offending agent(s), support directed at lowering temperature and preventing/treating complications, as well as targeted pharmacologic therapy directed at the specific cause. Early recognition and treatment using a multidisciplinary approach are essential to achieve the best possible outcome.