Sedation for critically ill or injured adults in the intensive care unit: a shifting paradigm

Nurses' experiences of caring for critically ill, non-sedated, mechanically ventilated patients in the Intensive Care Unit: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to explore nurses' experiences of caring for non-sedated, critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The study had a qualitative explorative design and was based on 13 months of fieldwork in two intensive care units in Denmark where a protocol of no sedation is implemented. Data were generated during participant observation in practice and by interviews with 16 nurses. Data were analysed using thematic interpretive description.

FINDINGS

An overall theme emerged: "Demanding, yet rewarding". The demanding aspects of caring for more awake intubated patients included unpredictability, ambiguous needs and complex actions, while the rewarding aspects included personal interaction. Three sub-themes were identified: (i) caring for and with the patient, (ii) negotiating relational and instrumental care and (iii) managing physical and emotional closeness.

CONCLUSION

Despite the complexity of care, nurses preferred to care for more awake rather than sedated patients and appreciated caring for just one patient at a time. The importance of close collaboration between nurses and doctors to ensure patient comfort during mechanical ventilation was valued. Caring for more awake non-sedated patients required the nurses to act at the interface between ambiguous possibilities and needs, which was perceived as both demanding and rewarding.

Diazepam or midazolam for orotracheal intubation in the ICU?

OBJECTIVE

to compare clinical and cost effectiveness of midazolam and diazepam for urgent intubation.

METHODS

patients admitted to the Central ICU of the Santa Casa Hospital Complex in Porto Alegre, over the age of 18 years, undergoing urgent intubation during 6 months were eligible. Patients were randomized in a single-blinded manner to either intravenous diazepam or midazolam. Diazepam was given as a 5 mg intravenous bolus followed by aliquots of 5 mg each minute. Midazolam was given as an intravenous bolus of 5 mg with further aliquots of 2.5 mg each minute. Ramsay sedation scale 5-6 was considered adequate sedation. We recorded time and required doses to reach adequate sedation and duration of sedation.

RESULTS

thirty four patients were randomized, but one patient in the diazepam group was excluded because data were lost. Both groups were similar in terms of illness severity and demographics. Time for adequate sedation was shorter (132 ± 87 sec vs. 224 ± 117 sec, p = 0.016) but duration of sedation was similar (86 ± 67 min vs. 88 ± 50 min, p = 0.936) for diazepam in comparison to midazolam. Total drug dose to reach adequate sedation after either drugs was similar (10.0 [10.0-12.5] mg vs. 15.0 [10.0-17.5] mg, p = 0.248). Arterial pressure and sedation intensity reduced similarly overtime with both drugs. Cost of sedation was lower for diazepam than for midazolam (1.4[1.4-1.8] vs. 13.9[9.4-16.2] reais, p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

intubation using intravenous diazepam and midazolam is effective and well tolerated. Sedation with diazepam is associated to a quicker sedation time and to lower costs.

The outcome of agitation in poisoned patients in an Iranian tertiary care university hospital

Introduction. This study was conducted to evaluate and document the frequency and causes of agitation, the symptoms accompanying this condition in intoxications, relationship between agitation score on admission and different variables, and the outcome of therapy in a tertiary care referral poisoning center in Iran. Methods. In this prospective observational study which was done in 2012, 3010 patients were screened for agitation at the time of admission using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale. Demographic data including age, gender, and the drug ingested were also recorded. The patients' outcome was categorized as recovery without complications, recovery with complications (hyperthermia, renal failure, and other causes), and death. Results. Agitation was observed in 56 patients (males, n = 41), mostly aged 19–40 years (n = 38) and more frequently in illegal substance (stimulants, opioids and also alcohol) abusers. Agitation score was not significantly related to the age, gender, and previous history of psychiatric disorders. Forty nine patients had recovery without any complication. The need for mechanical ventilation was the most frequent complication. None of the patients died. Conclusion. Drug abuse seems to be a must-to-consider etiology for patients presenting with acute agitation and its morbidity and mortality could be low in agitated poisoning cases if prompt supportive care is performed.

Evaluation of risk factors, including fluconazole administration, for prolonged anesthetic recovery times in horses undergoing general anesthesia for ocular surgery: 81 cases (2006-2013)

OBJECTIVE--To determine risk factors for prolonged anesthetic recovery time in horses that underwent general anesthesia for ocular surgery. DESIGN--Retrospective cohort study. ANIMALS--81 horses that underwent general anesthesia for ocular surgery between 2006 and 2013. PROCEDURES--Descriptive information recorded included the ocular procedure performed, concurrent fluconazole treatments, analgesic and anesthetic agents administered, procedure duration, use of sedation for recovery, and recovery time. Data were analyzed for associations between recovery time and other variables. RESULTS--81 horses met inclusion criteria. In 72 horses, anesthesia was induced with ketamine and midazolam; 16 horses treated concurrently with fluconazole had significantly longer mean recovery time (109 minutes [95% confidence interval {CI}, 94 to 124 minutes]) than did 56 horses that were not treated with fluconazole (50 minutes [95% CI, 44 to 55 minutes]). In 9 horses anesthetized with a protocol that included ketamine but did not include midazolam, there was no difference between mean recovery time in horses that either received (59 minutes [95% CI, 36 to 81 minutes]; n = 5) or did not receive (42 minutes [95% CI, 16 to 68 minutes]; 4) fluconazole. Other variables identified as risk factors for prolonged recovery included duration of anesthesia and use of acepromazine for premedication. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE--Fluconazole administration was associated with prolonged anesthetic recovery time in horses when ketamine and midazolam were used to induce anesthesia for ocular surgery. Duration of anesthesia and premedication with acepromazine were also identified as risk factors for prolonged recovery time.

Propofol is associated with favorable outcomes compared with benzodiazepines in ventilated intensive care unit patients

RATIONALE

Mechanically ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients are frequently managed using a continuous-infusion sedative. Although recent guidelines suggest avoiding benzodiazepines for sedation, this class of drugs is still widely used. There are limited data comparing sedative agents in terms of clinical outcomes in an ICU setting.

OBJECTIVES

Comparison of propofol to midazolam and lorazepam in adult ICU patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a multicenter ICU database (2003-2009). Patient selection criteria included age greater than or equal to 18 years, single ICU admission with single ventilation event (>48 h), and treatment with continuously infused sedation (propofol, midazolam, or lorazepam). Propensity score analysis (1:1) was used and mortality measured. Cumulative incidence and competing risk methodology were used to examine time to ICU discharge and ventilator removal.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There were 2,250 propofol-midazolam and 1,054 propofol-lorazepam matched patients. Hospital mortality was statistically lower in propofol-treated patients as compared with midazolam- or lorazepam-treated patients (risk ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.82 and risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.89, respectively). Competing risk analysis for 28-day ICU time period showed that propofol-treated patients had a statistically higher probability for ICU discharge (78.9% vs. 69.5%; 79.2% vs. 71.9%; P < 0.001) and earlier removal from the ventilator (84.4% vs. 75.1%; 84.3% vs. 78.8%; P < 0.001) when compared with midazolam- and lorazepam-treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, propensity-matched ICU population, patients treated with propofol had a reduced risk of mortality and had both an increased likelihood of earlier ICU discharge and earlier discontinuation of mechanical ventilation.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of propofol with midazolam for sedation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies were included in the meta-analysis if they met the following criteria: randomized controlled trial of sedative-hypnotic agents including propofol and midazolam; patients had severe traumatic brain injury; the primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale score; secondary outcomes included mortality, therapeutic failure, intracranial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure. The data were analyzed using software for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven relevant studies were identified. Three of these studies were excluded: one was a single-arm study, one compared morphine and propofol, and for one the full text article could not be obtained. The remaining 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that propofol and midazolam have similar effects on the Glasgow Outcome Scale score, mortality, intracranial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis of 4 studies showed that there are no important differences between propofol and midazolam when administered to provide sedation for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Further randomized, controlled trials comparing propofol with midazolam for sedation of such patients are needed.

Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion considerations in critically ill adults

INTRODUCTION

All critically ill patients require medication to treat organ dysfunction. However, the pharmacokinetics of drugs used to treat these patients is complex due to frequent alterations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME).

AREAS COVERED

This review examines pharmacokinetic aspects of drug administration for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Specifically, the authors examine the ADME changes that occur and which should be considered by clinicians when delivering drug therapy to critically ill patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Dosage pharmacokinetics determined from single-dose or limited-duration administration studies in healthy volunteers may not apply to critically ill patients. Organ dysfunction among these patients may be due to pre-existing disease or the effects of a systemic or locoregional inflammatory response precipitated by their illness. Alterations in pharmacokinetics observed among the critically ill include altered bioavailability after enteral administration, increased volume of distribution and blood-brain barrier permeability and changes in P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 enzyme function. However, the effect of these changes on clinically important outcomes remains uncertain and poorly studied. Future investigations should examine not only pharmacokinetic changes among the critically ill, but also whether recognition of these changes and alterations in drug therapy directed as a consequence of their observation alters patient outcomes.