Presurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly: effects on the remission and complication rates

Octreotide LAR for the treatment of acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin analogs previously considered as adjuvant therapy in acromegaly are increasingly used as a first-line therapy in selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To review the octreotide LAR pharmacological and clinical data, and discuss the impact of this agent on current treatment regimens.

METHODS

We reviewed PubMed publications since the first use of octreotide LAR in acromegaly, and historical articles related to the discovery and development of this molecule. We chose, for efficacy and safety data, reviews, clinical and randomized controlled trials that included >or=10 patients.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Octreotide LAR controls acromegaly in approximately 50-60% of patients by inhibiting GH and IGF-I secretion, and by reducing tumor size. This drug is well tolerated in most patients.

The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma

CONTEXT

Single-session stereotactic radiotherapy (SR) may be a potential adjuvant treatment in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the safety and efficacy of SR in patients who had previously received maximal surgical debulking at our center.

DESIGN

The study was a retrospective analysis of hormonal, radiological, and ophthalmologic data collected in a predefined protocol from 1994 through 2006.

SETTING

The study was performed at a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Eighty-three acromegalic patients, 52 women and 31 men, with a mean age of 42.6 +/- 1.2 yr, participated in the study. The median follow-up was 69 months (interquartile range 44-107 months).

INTERVENTION

The patients were treated with SR for residual or recurrent GH-secreting adenoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Normalization of age- and sex-adjusted IGF-I levels together with a basal GH level below 2.5 microg/liter without concomitant GH-suppressive drugs was the goal of therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (60.2%) reached the main outcome of the study. The rate of remission was 52.6% at 5 yr [95% confidence interval (CI) 40.6-64.6%]. Another 13 patients (15.7%), who were resistant to somatostatin analogs, were in remission after SR. Multivariate analysis showed that low basal GH and IGF-I levels were associated with a favorable outcome. No serious side effects occurred after SR. The 5-yr cumulative risk of new onset hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, or hypoadrenalism was 3.6% (95% CI 0-8.6%), 3.3% (95% CI 0-7.7%), and 4.9% (95% CI 0-10.4%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In a highly selected group of acromegalic patients, SR treatment had good efficacy and safety. This may lead to reconsider the role of SR in the therapeutic algorithm of acromegaly.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

An audit of treatment outcome in acromegalic patients attending our center at Bergamo, Italy

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly is a chronic disease impacting on morbidity and mortality. Increased mortality is reverted after the achievement of hormonal targets. The relative role of treatment options is still matter of debate.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all the acromegalic patients attending our center along the last 20 years.

RESULTS

Data about 159 patients (83 F) were retrieved and analyzed: 18% had been lost to follow-up, while follow-up was >5 years in 79%. Growth hormone (GH) at diagnosis was 24 microg/L (median, range 3-239). Pituitary MRI showed a macro-, micro-adenoma or no lesion in 73.6, 22.9, and 3.5%, respectively. Hyperprolactinemia (hyperPRL) was present in 20.8%. Ninety-six and 29 patients had been treated by neurosurgery (NS) and irradiated (RT), respectively. Drugs had been employed in 149 patients (in 58 as the only treatment). At the last evaluation, 22% of patients were cured (hypopituitarism and GH deficiency in 6.3%), 37.1% were controlled by ongoing pharmacological treatment, 22.6% had discordant GH and Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) values, and 18.2% had still active disease (median follow-up in this last group was 9 months). By evaluating the outcome with a multimodal approach, safe GH and normal IGF-I had been achieved in 78 and 63.5% of the whole series, 80.5 and 59.7% in patients submitted to NS (and adjuvantly treated with drugs), 95.8 and 91.7% in those submitted to NS + RT (and drugs as well), 70.2 and 55.2% in those treated only with drugs (increased to 82.2 and 60.9% if considering only patients treated with modern long-acting drugs). Hypopituitarism had occurred in 25, 66.6, and 13.8% in the three groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, previous RT and NS were significant positive predictors of cure, whereas previous NS, follow-up, and year of diagnosis were significant positive predictors of control. Diabetes was a negative predictor both of cure and control. Sex, age, baseline GH levels, hyperPRL, tumor size, extrasellar extension, and invasiveness were not independent predictors of either cure or control.

CONCLUSION

This series seems to indicate that a multimodal approach can achieve control of disease in most patients.