Prognostic implications of additional genomic lesions in adult Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Dasatinib-Blinatumomab for Ph-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Molecular remission is a primary goal of treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 2 single-group trial of first-line therapy in adults with newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL (with no upper age limit). Dasatinib plus glucocorticoids were administered, followed by two cycles of blinatumomab. The primary end point was a sustained molecular response in the bone marrow after this treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients (median age, 54 years; range, 24 to 82) who were enrolled, a complete remission was observed in 98%. At the end of dasatinib induction therapy (day 85), 29% of the patients had a molecular response, and this percentage increased to 60% after two cycles of blinatumomab; the percentage of patients with a molecular response increased further after additional blinatumomab cycles. At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival was 95% and disease-free survival was 88%; disease-free survival was lower among patients who had an IKZF1 deletion plus additional genetic aberrations (CDKN2A or CDKN2B, PAX5, or both [i.e., IKZF1 ^plus]). ABL1 mutations were detected in 6 patients who had increased minimal residual disease during induction therapy, and all these mutations were cleared by blinatumomab. Six relapses occurred. Overall, 21 adverse events of grade 3 or higher were recorded. A total of 24 patients received a stem-cell allograft, and 1 death was related to transplantation (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

A chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation first-line treatment with dasatinib and blinatumomab that was based on a targeted and immunotherapeutic strategy was associated with high incidences of molecular response and survival and few toxic effects of grade 3 or higher in adults with Ph-positive ALL. (Funded by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and others; GIMEMA LAL2116 D-ALBA EudraCT number, 2016-001083-11; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02744768.).

Comparative study on allogeneic with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of TKIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is recommended as a standard approach for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) achieving complete remission (CR). However, the role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in adult patients achieving complete molecular remission (CMR) is an alternative, less toxic treatment options, especially for the patients who lack suitable donors and are unfit for allo-HSCT. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT for the treatment of adult patients with Ph+ ALL. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies published before June 2019 without language restriction. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for relapse rate (RR) and treatment-related mortality (TRM). Four prospective studies and one retrospective study were included with a total of 810 patients. We found auto-HSCT was superior to allo-HSCT in OS (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.06-1.91, P = 0.02), and there was no difference between allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT for RFS (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.86-1.40, P = 0.44) and RR (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.22-1.26, P = 0.15). The risk of TRM for patients undergoing allo-HSCT was significantly higher than that of the patients who received auto-HSCT (OR = 5.06, 95% CI: 1.03-24.75, P = 0.05). Our meta-analysis shows that auto-HSCT may be an attractive and alternative treatment option for adult Ph+ ALL patients achieving CMR, with similar or better outcomes than allo-HSCT in the era of TKIs.

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of extramedullary relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Extramedullary relapse (EMR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) continues to remain a clinical challenge. The data on EMR in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are currently limited. Herein, a retrospective analysis of 268 adult ALL patients who underwent allo-HSCT in our center between March 2008 and December 2017 was performed to analyze post-HSCT EMR. Ninety patients (33.58%) experienced relapse; 51(19.03%) experienced bone marrow relapse (BMR), whereas 39 (14.55%) experienced EMR. The 5-year cumulative EMR incidence (CEMRI) revealed that matched sibling donor (MSD)-HSCTs were more likely to develop EMR than unrelated donor (URD)- and haploidentical-related donor (HRD)-HSCTs (CEMRI: 24.02%, 7.69%, and 14.69% for MSD, URD, and HRD, respectively). Notably, MSD-HSCTs (URD vs MSD hazard ratio (HR) = 0.26, p = 0.015; HRD vs MSD HR = 0.46, p = 0.032), history of extramedullary disease (EMD) (HR = 2.45, p = 0.041), and T cell ALL (HR = 2.80, p = 0.012) were independent risk factors for EMR in the multivariate analysis. The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 15.23 months. However, the OS of EMR patients was significantly longer (19.50 months) than that of BMR patients (12.90 months) (p = 0.003). Multivariate analyses revealed that the leading risk factors for post-relapse deaths were shorter intervals between HSCT and relapse (> 12 months vs ≤ 12 months, HR = 0.30, p < 0.001) and BMR (HR = 0.41, p = 0.002). In conclusion, EMR patients have better survival than BMR patients. ALL patients with allo-HSCT from MSDs, a history of EMD, and the T cell type were significantly associated with EMR.

Current treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome-positive adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an aggressive hematological disease. The incorporation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into the standard treatment regimen for Philadelphia (Ph)-positive ALL significantly improved clinical outcomes. TKI-based induction chemotherapy, followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) during the first complete remission (CR), is the standard of care for ALL patients. However, treatment with TKIs alone or TKIs plus low-intensity chemotherapy can achieve CR in some patients. Although this strategy is not enough to induce a deeper molecular response, it can reduce the incidence of treatment-related mortality. Despite promising results from pediatric trials, allogeneic HCT remains an important component of the treatment strategy for Ph-positive adult ALL. However, improving the highly sensitive BCR-ABL1 assays and introducing immunotherapy may decrease the demand for allogeneic HCT. Nevertheless, the treatment of Ph-positive ALL is still challenging, especially in cases with relapsed and refractory disease. Potent TKIs and monoclonal antibodies, such as blinatumomab and inotuzumab, have improved patient outcomes in relapse and refractory cases of ALL. The introduction of effective agents, such as potent TKIs and monoclonal antibodies, may improve the possibility of remission in Ph-positive ALL patients and hopefully cure this disease.

IKZF1 alterations in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: The good, the bad and the ugly

Advances in genomics have deepened our understanding of the biology of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), defined novel molecular leukemia subtypes, discovered new prognostic biomarkers and paved the way to emerging molecularly targeted therapeutic avenues. Since its discovery, IKZF1 has generated significant interest within the leukemia scientific community.IKZF1 plays a critical role in lymphoid development and its alterations cooperate to mediate leukemogenesis. IKZF1 alterations are present in approximately 15% of childhood ALL, rise in prevalence among adults with ALL and become highly enriched within kinase-driven ALL. A cumulating body of literature has highlighted the adverse prognostic impact of IKZF1 alterations in both Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative and Ph-driven ALL. IKZF1 alterations thus emerge as an important prognostic biomarker in ALL. This article aims to provide a state-of-the-art review focusing on the prognostic clinical relevance of IKZF1 alterations in ALL, as well as current and future therapeutic strategies targeting IKZF1-altered ALL.

Evidence-based review of genomic aberrations in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma: Report from the cancer genomics consortium working group for lymphoblastic leukemia

Clinical management and risk stratification of B-lymphoblastic leukemia/ lymphoma (B-ALL/LBL) depend largely on identification of chromosomal abnormalities obtained using conventional cytogenetics and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) testing. In the last few decades, testing algorithms have been implemented to support an optimal risk-oriented therapy, leading to a large improvement in overall survival. In addition, large scale genomic studies have identified multiple aberrations of prognostic significance that are not routinely tested by existing modalities. However, as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are increasingly used in clinical management of hematologic malignancies, these abnormalities may be more readily detected. In this article, we have compiled a comprehensive, evidence-based review of the current B-ALL literature, focusing on known and published subtypes described to date. More specifically, we describe the role of various testing modalities in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic relevance. In addition, we propose a testing algorithm aimed at assisting laboratories in the most effective detection of the underlying genomic abnormalities.

Practical guidance for the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the adolescent and young adult population

The outstanding therapeutic progress achieved with modern pediatric regimens in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) led efforts to explore whether a similar treatment approach could be equally effective and safe in older patients, starting initially with older adolescents and young adults (AYA), variably defined in different studies by an age between 15–18 and 25–39 years. Several comparative and noncomparative trials of this type have been carried out during the last two decades, enrolling thousands of patients. Almost without exception, the new strategy improved patients’ outcomes compared with traditional adult treatments in B-lineage and T-lineage Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-ALL, while the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) led to comparative progress in Ph+ ALL, a former high-risk subset more typically observed in older age groups. At present, highly effective pediatric-based regimens warrant 5-year survival rates of 60–70% in AYA patients. In view of these data, the same approach was progressively extended to older patients, improving the results up to 55 years of age. Issues of treatment compliance and drug-related toxicity have thus far prevented a comparable therapeutic advancement in patients aged >55 years. This critical review updates and summarizes with pertinent examples this global, positive therapeutic change, and examines how to promote further progress with new targeted therapies that include novel immuno-therapeutics and other agents developed against the many molecular dysfunctions detectable in various ALL subsets. Substantial progress is expected to occur soon, bringing AYA survival figures very close to that of children, and also to improve the outcome of ALL at all ages.

Let's Talk About BiTEs and Other Drugs in the Real-Life Setting for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background: Therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are currently initially efficient, but even if a high percentage of patients have an initial complete remission (CR), most of them relapse. Recent data shows that immunotherapy with either bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells can eliminate residual chemotherapy-resistant B-ALL cells.

Objective: The objective of the manuscript is to present improvements in the clinical outcome for chemotherapy-resistant ALL in the real-life setting, by describing Romania's experience with bispecific antibodies for B-cell ALL.

Methods: We present the role of novel therapies for relapsed B-cell ALL, including the drugs under investigation in phase I-III clinical trials, as a potential bridge to transplant. Blinatumomab is presented in a critical review, presenting both the advantages of this drug, as well as its limitations.

Results: Bispecific antibodies are discussed, describing the clinical trials that resulted in its approval by the FDA and EMA. The real-life setting for relapsed B-cell ALL is described and we present the patients treated with blinatumomab in Romania.

Conclusion: In the current manuscript, we present blinatumomab as a therapeutic alternative in the bridge-to-transplant setting for refractory or relapsed ALL, to gain a better understanding of the available therapies and evidence-based data for these patients in 2019.

Curing Ph+ ALL: assessing the relative contributions of chemotherapy, TKIs, and allogeneic stem cell transplant

The understanding and treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia have changed rapidly in the past 10 years. The outcome is equally as good as for Ph- disease, and with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in addition to chemotherapy, the novel immunotherapy approaches, and the extension of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) to older individuals, there is the potential to exceed this outcome. There is particular interest in reducing chemotherapy exposure and considering for whom allo-HCT can be avoided. However, the patient population that can help test these options in clinical trials is limited in number, and the available evidence is often derived from single-arm studies. This paper summarizes outcomes achieved with recent approaches to de novo Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the postimatinib era and helps integrate all the available information to assist the reader to make informed choices for patients in an increasingly complex field.

How I treat Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The introduction of agents targeted at specific molecular events is changing the treatment paradigms in a number of malignancies. Historically, we have relied entirely on DNA-interactive, cytotoxic drugs for treating patients with leukemia. Increased understanding of the leukemic cell biology and pathogenesis, and the ways they evade the immune surveillance mechanisms, will likely lead to the development of more effective agents, and regimens less reliant on chemotherapy, able to achieve deep levels of disease eradication. In Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the introduction of increasingly potent tyrosine kinas inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized therapy. These drugs have been established as the cornerstone of any therapeutic strategy in this disease, and a number of trials have better defined the best ways to incorporate them into the established paradigms. Despite using TKIs, we have continued to remain reliant on cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant to achieve the best long-term outcomes. However, with the introduction of more potent TKIs and other novel agents, as well as better methods for monitoring minimal/measurable residual disease, we are entering an era where we hope to diminish our reliance on transplantation and cytotoxic chemotherapy in this disease.