Diagnostic delay in inflammatory bowel disease increases the risk of intestinal surgery

Diagnostic delay and colectomy risk in pediatric ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Diagnostic delay or time to diagnosis, and its relationship with colectomy risk has been studied in adult Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), but rarely in pediatric IBD (PIBD), especially pediatric ulcerative colitis (P-UC), which often has a more severe course than adult UC. This study compared the relationship between diagnostic delay and colectomy in P-UC.

METHODS

The medical records of P-UC patients, ages <18 years, diagnosed at Texas Children's Hospital from 2012 to 2018 were examined. We identified 106 P-UC patients, where the onset of symptoms of IBD (i.e. fever, diarrhea, blood in stool, weight loss, abdominal pain) could be clearly identified.

RESULTS

Twenty (20 = 18.9%) patients progressed to colectomy, and 86 did not. There was no significant difference in diagnostic delay between the patients undergoing colectomy with UC (C-UC) and those with no colectomy (NC-UC) (p = 0.2192). The median (C-UC = 7.1 weeks; NC-UC = 11.9 weeks) and mean (C-UC = 16.5 weeks±4.7; NC-UC = 20.1 ± 2.6) diagnostic delay actually tended to be shorter in C-UC compared to NC-UC. Fecal calprotectin levels were significantly higher (p = 0.0228) in C-UC than NC-UC patients at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter time to diagnosis may reflect disease severity at the time of disease onset and also a more aggressive subsequent course of P-UC. The significantly higher level of fecal calprotectin in the C-UC patients at diagnosis provided biologic/biochemical support for our conclusion.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis study, Level III evidence.

Diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative faecal immunochemical test vs. symptoms suspected for colorectal cancer in patients referred for colonoscopy

Objective: Determine diagnostic accuracy of a quantitative faecal immunochemical haemoglobin test (QuikRead go^® FIT, Orion Diagnostica Oy) in symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy, at various cut-offs and for one or two tests.Methods: Patients referred to four endoscopy units in mid-Sweden between 2013 and 2017 provided information on lower abdominal symptoms and faecal samples from two separate days prior to colonoscopy.Results: In all, 5.4% (13/242) patients had colorectal cancer (CRC). For one FIT at cut-off 10 µg Hb/g faeces, sensitivity for CRC was 92% (95% CI 78-100%) and specificity 77% (95% CI 72-83%); equal to 74%; 95% CI 68-80 (178/242) colonoscopies potentially avoidable and one CRC missed. Based on the maximal outcome of two FITs, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 71% (66-77%) and 68%; 95% CI 62-74 (160/237) colonoscopies potentially avoidable. Among 17% (42/242) patients with one FIT of >200 µg Hb/g faeces, 85% (11/13) had CRC. Positive predictive values of FIT varied 16.9-26.2% depending on cut-off and one or two FITs, whereas NPVs were 99% and above in all scenarios.In 60 patients reporting rectal bleeding, one FIT at cut-off 10 µg Hb/g discriminated well between CRC and other conditions (p = .001). In regression models, FIT was more important than age, sex and all symptoms.Conclusion: One or two FITs in symptomatic patients referred for colonoscopy imply powerful risk stratification abilities for CRC, even among patients reporting rectal bleeding. Larger studies in various settings will clarify how to make the best use of this opportunity. Trial registration: Clinicaltrails.gov NCT02491593.

Effect of distance to specialist care for the diagnosis and disease outcome of inflammatory bowel disease in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) needs early interventions and an individual specialist-patient relationship. Distance from a tertiary IBD center might affect patient's disease course and outcome. We investigated whether the patient-to-specialist distance has an impact on the disease course using the well-defined patient collective of the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (SIBDCS).

METHODS

Patient's home address at diagnosis (postal zip code) was extracted from the SIBDCS database. Distance between each zip code and the nearest located IBD specialist center was calculated and classified into the following three sections based on proximity: <10 km (group 1); 10-35 km (group 2); >35 km (group 3).

RESULTS

Our study included in total 408 IBD patients [234 Crohn's disease (CD), 154 ulcerative colitis (UC), 20 IBD unclassified (IBDU)]. Median age was lowest in group 2 at diagnosis (G1: 28 years; G2: 21 years, G3: 26 years, p < 0.01). The diagnostic delay did not differ between groups. CD patients in group 1 were treated more often with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (72% versus 56%, p = 0.04) and 5-aminosalicylates (44% versus 28%, p = 0.04) than in group 3. UC/IBDU patients in group 1 were treated more often with corticosteroids than patients in group 3 (83% versus 58%, p < 0.01). The occurrence of IBD-related surgeries did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-to-specialist distance might affect drug treatment. However, disease course and the need for IBD-related surgery does not seem to be associated with a longer distance to specialist care in Switzerland.

Impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis, assessment and management of children with inflammatory bowel disease in the UK: implications for practice

The assessment and management of patients with known, or suspected, paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) has been hugely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although current evidence of the impact of COVID-19 infection in children with PIBD has provided a degree of reassurance, there continues to be the potential for significant secondary harm caused by the changes to normal working practices and reorganisation of services. Disruption to the normal running of diagnostic and assessment procedures, such as endoscopy, has resulted in the potential for secondary harm to patients including delayed diagnosis and delay in treatment. Difficult management decisions have been made in order to minimise COVID-19 risk for this patient group while avoiding harm. Initiating and continuing immunosuppressive and biological therapies in the absence of normal surveillance and diagnostic procedures have posed many challenges. Despite this, changes to working practices, including virtual clinic appointments, home faecal calprotectin testing kits and continued intensive support from clinical nurse specialists and other members of the multidisciplinary team, have resulted in patients still receiving a high standard of care, with those who require face-to-face intervention being highlighted. These changes have the potential to revolutionise the way in which patients receive routine care in the future, with the inclusion of telemedicine increasingly attractive for stable patients. There is also the need to use lessons learnt from this pandemic to plan for a possible second wave, or future pandemics as well as implementing some permanent changes to normal working practices. In this review, we describe the diagnosis, management and direct impact of COVID-19 in paediatric patients with IBD. We summarise the guidance and describe the implemented changes, evolving evidence and the implications of this virus on paediatric patients with IBD and working practices.

Illuminating an Invisible Epidemic: A Systemic Review of the Clinical and Economic Benefits of Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Inflammatory Disease and Related Syndromes

Healthcare expenditures in the United States are growing at an alarming level with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) projecting that they will reach $5.7 trillion per year by 2026. Inflammatory diseases and related syndromes are growing in prevalence among Western societies. This growing population that affects close to 60 million people in the U.S. places a significant burden on the healthcare system. Characterized by relatively slow development, these diseases and syndromes prove challenging to diagnose, leading to delayed treatment against the backdrop of inevitable disability progression. Patients require healthcare attention but are initially hidden from clinician's view by the seemingly generalized, non-specific symptoms. It is imperative to identify and manage these underlying conditions to slow disease progression and reduce the likelihood that costly comorbidities will develop. Enhanced diagnostic criteria coupled with additional technological innovation to identify inflammatory conditions earlier is necessary and in the best interest of all healthcare stakeholders. The current total cost to the U.S. healthcare system is at least $90B dollars annually. Through unique analysis of financial cost drivers, this review identifies opportunities to improve clinical outcomes and help control these disease-related costs by 20% or more.

Two-year delay in ulcerative colitis diagnosis is associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha use

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an uncommon inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, its incidence has recently increased in South Korea. Moreover, UC diagnoses are frequently delayed, and the relationship between diagnostic delay and UC prognosis has not been extensively studied in South Korean patients.

AIM

To identify meaningful diagnostic delay affecting UC prognosis and to evaluate risk factors associated with diagnostic delay in South Korean patients.

METHODS

Medical records of 718 patients with UC who visited the outpatient clinic of six university hospitals in South Korea were reviewed; 167 cases were excluded because the first symptom date was unknown. We evaluated the relationship between the prognosis and a diagnostic delay of 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo by comparing the prognostic factors [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α use, admission history due to acute flare-ups, frequent admission due to flare-ups, surgery associated with UC, and the clinical remission state at the latest follow-up] at each diagnostic interval.

RESULTS

The mean diagnostic interval was 223.3 ± 483.2 d (median, 69 d; 75^th percentile, 195 d). Among the prognostic factors, anti-TNFα use was significantly increased after a diagnostic delay of 24 mo. Clinical risk factors predictive of a 24-mo diagnostic delay were age < 60 years at diagnosis [odd ratio (OR) = 14.778, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.731-126.121], smoking history (OR = 2.688, 95%CI: 1.239-5.747, P = 0.012), and misdiagnosis of hemorrhoids (OR = 11.066, 95%CI: 3.596-34.053). Anti-TNFα use was associated with extensive UC at diagnosis (OR = 3.768, 95%CI: 1.860-7.632) and 24-mo diagnostic delay (OR = 2.599, 95%CI: 1.006-4.916).

CONCLUSION

A diagnostic delay > 24 mo was associated with increased anti-TNFα use. Age < 60 years at diagnosis, smoking history, and misdiagnosis of hemorrhoids were risk factors for delayed diagnosis.

Diagnostic delay in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Austria

BACKGROUND

Delayed diagnosis seems to be common in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The study was carried out to investigate the diagnostic delay and associated risk factors in Austrian IBD patients.

METHODS

In a multicenter cross-sectional study adult patients with IBD attending 18 Austrian outpatient clinics completed a multi-item questionnaire that recorded medical and socioeconomic characteristics. The study outcome was diagnostic delay defined as the period from symptom onset to diagnosis of IBD.

RESULTS

A total of 1286 patients (Crohn's disease 830, ulcerative colitis 435, inflammatory bowel disease unclassified 21; females 651) with a median age of 40 years (interquartile range 31-52 years) and a median disease duration of 10 years (4-18 years) were analyzed. The median diagnostic delay was 6 months (2-23 months) in Crohn's disease and 3 months (1-10 months) in ulcerative colitis (p < 0.001). In the multivariable regression analysis Crohn's disease, greater age at diagnosis and a high educational level (compared to middle degree level) were independently associated with longer diagnostic delay.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic delay was longer in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis patients and was associated with greater age at diagnosis and a higher educational level.

Time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in patients followed in gastroenterological practices in Germany

AIMS

The goal of the present study was to analyze the time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in patients followed in gastroenterological practices in Germany.

METHODS

The study included individuals who received a suspected diagnosis of CD or UC (index date) and were followed in 47 gastroenterological practices in Germany between January 2007 and December 2016. The main outcome measure of the study was the time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses of CD and UC. Covariables included age, sex, and type of health insurance (private or statutory). A multivariate linear regression model was used to analyze the impact of the different variables on the time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses of CD and UC.

RESULTS

The study included 2657 patients with a suspected diagnosis of CD and UC between 2007 and 2016. The mean age was 39.7 (SD 15.9) and 41.3 (16.8) in the CD and UC groups, respectively. Median time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses was 46 days in the CD group and 43 days in the UC group. Median time ranged from 8 to 112 days in the different gastroenterology practices and was significantly shorter in individuals with private health insurance coverage than in those with statutory health insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Median time between suspected and confirmed diagnoses of CD or UC was around 45 days in patients followed in gastroenterological practices in Germany. Health insurance was the only factor to have a significant impact on this time.