Perioperative management of the obese orthopaedic patient

Orthopedic trauma surgery in the morbidly obese patient

PURPOSE

The treatment of morbidly obese patients in orthopedic trauma differs in many ways compared to injured patients with normal body mass indices. This paper highlights key differences and ways to overcome obstacles.

METHODS

We present specific tips, as well as considerations for initial planning, positioning for surgery, intra-operative strategies, and a discussion on both anesthesia and imaging.

RESULTS

Several treatment strategies have been shown to have better results in morbidly obese patients. Pre-operative planning is necessary for minimizing risk to the patient.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of morbid obesity has increased in the USA in the past quarter century. Treatment for orthopedic injuries in morbidly obese patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that addresses not only their orthopedic injuries, but also medical co-morbidities. A team of medicine doctors, anesthesiologists, X-ray technicians, physical and occupational therapists, respiratory therapists, and social workers is needed in addition to the orthopedic surgeon. Modifications in both pre-operative planning and intra-operative strategies may be necessary in order to accommodate the patient. This paper presents numerous technical tips that can aid in providing stable fixation for fractures, as well as addressing peri-operative issues specific to the morbidly obese.

The influence of obesity on total joint arthroplasty

Obesity is an epidemic across both the developed and developing nations that is possibly the most important current public health factor affecting the morbidity and mortality of the global population. Obese patients have the potential to pose several challenges for arthroplasty surgeons from the standpoint of the influence obesity has on osteoarthritic symptoms, their peri-operative medical management, the increased intra-operative technical demands on the surgeon, the intra- and post-operative complications, the long term outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Also, there is no consensus on the role the arthroplasty surgeon should have in facilitating weight loss for these patients, nor whether obesity should affect the access to arthroplasty procedures.

Wound closure

In this paper, we consider wound healing after total knee arthroplasty.

Impact of obesity on orthopaedics

The prevalence of obesity among children and adults is increasing worldwide. There are substantial health risks and financial costs associated with the obesity epidemic that impact the practice of orthopaedic surgery. Patients with increased body mass index are more prone to sustaining distal extremity injuries than are those with a normal body mass index. Obese individuals are more likely than nonobese individuals to seek treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Obesity and symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee

Given the growing prevalence of obesity around the world and its association with osteoarthritis of the knee, orthopaedic surgeons need to be familiar with the management of the obese patient with degenerative knee pain. The precise mechanism by which obesity leads to osteoarthritis remains unknown, but is likely to be due to a combination of mechanical, humoral and genetic factors. Weight loss has clear medical benefits for the obese patient and seems to be a logical way of relieving joint pain associated with degenerative arthritis. There are a variety of ways in which this may be done including diet and exercise, and treatment with drugs and bariatric surgery. Whether substantial weight loss can delay or even reverse the symptoms associated with osteoarthritis remains to be seen. Surgery for osteoarthritis in the obese patient can be technically more challenging and carries a risk of additional complications. Substantial weight loss before undertaking total knee replacement is advisable. More prospective studies that evaluate the effect of significant weight loss on the evolution of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee are needed so that orthopaedic surgeons can treat this patient group appropriately.

Effects of obesity on pediatric fracture care and management

Obese children have a theoretically increased risk of sustaining an extremity fracture because of potential variations in their bone mineral density, serum leptin levels, and altered balance and gait. Trauma databases suggest an increased rate of extremity fractures in obese children and adolescents involved in polytrauma compared with nonobese children and adolescents. Anesthetic and other perioperative concerns for obese pediatric trauma patients undergoing surgery include higher baseline blood pressures, increased rates of asthma, and obstructive sleep apnea. A child's weight must be considered when choosing the type of implant for fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Fracture prevention strategies in obese pediatric patients consist of ensuring properly sized safety gear for both motor vehicles and sporting activities and implementing structured weight-loss programs.

Postoperative complication rates in the "super-obese" hip and knee arthroplasty population

The effect of obesity on the outcomes of total joint arthroplasties is an ongoing concern. As obesity becomes more endemic, new categories emerge, such as the "super-obese." We conducted a retrospective study to determine the difference in outcomes among the super-obese. When categorized according to body mass index (BMI), the overall rate of complications was higher for patients with BMI of 45 or higher. Super-obese patients had an odds ratio (OR) of 8.44 for developing inhospital complications. Most importantly, each incremental 5-U increase in BMI above 45 was associated with an increased risk of inhospital (OR, 1.69) and outpatient complications (OR, 2.71), and readmission (OR, 2.0), compared with patients with BMI of 45 to 50. Length of stay was increased by 13.8% for each 5-U increase in BMI above 45. There is a significant increased risk for complications in the super-obese population, and this continues to increase with BMI increases above 45. These data are important when counseling super-obese patients and should be accounted for in reporting quality outcome measures in this population.

Acetabular fracture reductions in the obese patient

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the radiographic and computed tomographic reduction qualities after acetabular fracture repair in obese and nonobese patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred forty-two patients were treated with open reduction internal fixation for displaced acetabular fractures. The nonobese group (Group 1) consisted of 149 patients and the obese group (Group 2) had 93 patients. A nonmorbidly obese group (Group 3 = 221 patients) and a morbidly obese group (Group 4 = 21 patients) were also created from the same patient population.

INTERVENTION

Operative repair of acetabular fractures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Reductions on postoperative radiographs were classified as anatomic with less than 1 mm, imperfect with 2 to 3 mm, and poor with greater than 3 mm of residual displacement. On postoperative computed tomographic scans, reductions were considered nonanatomic with persistent gap or step displacements greater than or equal to 2 mm.

RESULTS

Anatomic radiographic reductions were achieved in 72% of the nonobese patients, 70% of the obese patients, 72% of the nonmorbidly obese patients, and 61% of the morbidly obese patients. (P = 0.379) On postoperative computed tomographic scans, an acceptable reduction was obtained in 47% of the nonobese patients, 44% of the obese patients, 47% of the nonmorbidly obese patients, and 31% of the morbidly obese patients. (P = 0.232).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic or satisfactory reductions can be similarly achieved in all classes of nonmorbidly obese patients who have sustained displaced acetabular fractures. In the morbidly obese, anatomic reductions may be more difficult to obtain.

Obesity and the orthopedic trauma patient: a review of the risks and challenges in medical and surgical management

The medical and surgical care of obese trauma patients presents a variety of unique and important challenges. Over the past 30 years, this population has increased dramatically in number, and the optimization of their care demands the attention of the medical community. The problems of caring for an obese trauma patient begin before the actual traumatic event occurs due to their substantially higher incidence of serious comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiopulmonary issues. In the setting of trauma, important considerations for the obese patient include careful and expeditious preoperative medical optimization; appropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis; planning for and preventing operative and postoperative challenges (eg, pulmonary and wound complications); and ensuring adequate hospital equipment and staffing resources in the acute and rehabilitative phases of care. This article outlines the scope of the obesity epidemic, reviews the medical consequences of obesity, and highlights surgical considerations specific to the care of orthopedic injuries in the obese trauma patient.

Ankle injuries and fractures in the obese patient

Ankle fractures are a common orthopedic injury. Certain ankle injuries have been associated with patient demographics such as obesity and smoking. Obese patients are more prone to severe ankle injuries. Naturally, these injuries affect the lower extremity mobility significantly, which itself is a risk factor for obesity. Although obese patients have increased complications across the board, there are specific techniques that can be used to assure the best possible outcome. The perioperative, surgical, and postoperative considerations as well as the outcomes are discussed in this article.

Office and hospital needs

Obesity is a national phenomenon that affects every facet of the delivery and the reception of health care. Orthopedic surgeons are not immune to these influences. This article discusses the social and physical environment in which orthopedic surgeons evaluate obese patients. Special attention should be paid in both the inpatient and outpatient arenas to the different emotional and physical needs with which obese patients present in contrast to their lean counterparts.

Percutaneous treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures in obese patients

A body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 is becoming increasingly common in the United States. Surgery for pelvic and acetabular fractures in this population is particularly problematic because conventional treatment often requires large surgical exposures. The surgery for both these fractures is technically difficult because of the volume of soft tissue and proneness to complications. Wound problems and infections are particularly common after open surgery in obese patients, and these increase linearly with the BMI. In this article, we present a small consecutive series over 14 months on obese patients who underwent percutaneous treatment of their pelvic or acetabular fractures.

Perioperative management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery

Persons with diabetes undergo more surgical procedures, have a higher perioperative risk of complications, and have longer hospital stays than do persons who do not have diabetes. Persons with diabetes are frequently overweight, have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and are more likely to suffer from chronic musculoskeletal conditions and traumatic injuries that require orthopaedic attention. Surgery frequently disrupts usual diabetes management, requiring adjustments to the treatment regimen. Suboptimal perioperative glucose control may contribute to increased morbidity, and it aggravates concomitant illnesses. Many patients undergoing elective or urgent orthopaedic surgery may have unrecognized diabetes or may develop stress-related hyperglycemia in the hospital. The challenge is to minimize the effects of metabolic derangements on surgical outcomes, reduce glycemic excursions, and prevent hypoglycemia. Recent guidelines advocate evidence-based glucose targets in the inpatient setting, and regimens for intravenous and subcutaneous insulin are gaining in popularity. Individualized treatment should be based on the ambient level of glycemic control, outpatient treatment regimen, presence of complications, nature of the surgical procedure, and type of anesthesia administered. Management by a multidisciplinary team and attention to discharge planning are key aspects of care during and after orthopaedic surgery.

Elevated body mass index increases early complications of surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative complications and to determine the incidence of reoperation after surgical treatment of pelvic ring injuries.

SETTING

Three Level I trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective review of 184 consecutive surgically treated pelvic ring injuries (Orthopaedic Trauma Association 61) was performed. Two patients died in the initial postoperative period, and the remaining 182 patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Complications that were evaluated included wound infection and dehiscence, loss of reduction, iatrogenic nerve injury, deep venous thrombosis, pneumonia, and the development of decubitus ulcers. Body mass index was calculated for each patient, and a BMI greater than 30 kg/m considered to be obese as defined by the National Institutes of Health.

RESULTS

There were 132 males and 50 females with an average age of 36.4 years (range, 14-83 years). There were 48 (26%) patients with a BMI over 30 kg/m. Complications occurred in 46 of 182 patients (25.3%) with 26 occurring in the 48 patients with BMI greater than 30 kg/m (54.2% complication rate) and 20 occurring in the 134 patients with BMI less than 30 kg/m (14.9% complication rate). Complications included 20 infections (four superficial wound dehiscence and 16 deep), 23 losses of reduction, five deep vein thromboses, three pulmonary embolus, three pneumonia, two decubitus ulcers, and three iatrogenic nerve injuries. Reoperation was required in 29 of 182 (15.9%) patients with 16 (8.8%) irrigation and débridement, and 17 (9.3%) refixation procedures. All wound complications occurred after open exposures. Open exposures were performed for the anterior pelvic ring in 143 of 182 (78.6%) patients, the posterior pelvic ring in 64 of 182 (35.2%) patients, and percutaneous treatment of the posterior pelvic ring was performed in 80 of 182 (44.0%) patients. Logistic regression modeling analyzing BMI as a continuous variable found a relationship between increasing BMI and complication rate (P < 0.0001) and need for reoperation (P = 0.0013). Odds ratios analysis revealed that obese patients (BMI greater than 30 kg/m) were 6.87 (95% confidence interval, 3.25-14.49) times more likely to have a complication and 4.68 (95% confidence interval, 2.03-10.76) times more likely to undergo reoperation than patients with BMI less than 30 kg/m.

CONCLUSIONS

Body mass index correlates with an increased rate of complications and reoperation after operative treatment of pelvic ring injuries.

The impact of pre-operative obesity on weight change and outcome in total knee replacement

We carried out a prospective, continuous study on 529 patients who underwent primary total knee replacement between January 2006 and December 2007 at a major teaching hospital. The aim was to investigate weight change and the functional and clinical outcome in non-obese and obese groups at 12 months post-operatively. The patients were grouped according to their pre-operative body mass index (BMI) as follows: non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2), obese (BMI 3 30 to 39 kg/m2) and morbidly obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2). The clinical outcome data were available for all patients and functional outcome data for 521 (98.5%). Overall, 318 (60.1%) of the patients were obese or morbidly obese.

At 12 months, a clinically significant weight loss of ≥ 5% had occurred in 40 (12.6%) of the obese patients, but 107 (21%) gained weight. The change in the International Knee Society score was less in obese and morbidly obese compared with non-obese patients (p = 0.016). Adverse events occurred in 30 (14.2%) of the non-obese, 59 (22.6%) of the obese and 20 (35.1%) of the morbidly obese patients (p = 0.001).

IMPACT OF BODY HABITUS ON PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY ASSOCIATED WITH FUSION OF THE THORACOLUMBAR AND LUMBAR SPINE

OBJECTIVE

Spinal fusion is performed in patients ranging from young and healthy to aged and frail. Although recent population trends in the United States are toward obesity, no large-scale study has evaluated how body habitus affects mortality, complications, and resource utilization for lumbar spine fusion. Such information is important for patient selection and to confirm the safety of such procedures in this population.

METHODS

Data for 244 170 patients who underwent thoracolumbar or lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disease between 1988 and 2004 were collected from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, and subjects were grouped by surgical approach and body habitus. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated group effects on selected postoperative complications, length of stay, resource utilization, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

This study confirms that body habitus affects perioperative morbidity sustained by patients undergoing thoracolumbar or lumbar spine fusion. Demographic heterogeneity exists for race, geography, and number of diseased levels among body habitus groups, prompting application of multivariate logistic regression for outcomes. For all approaches, higher body mass index associated with increased transfusion requirements and likelihood of discharge to assisted living. Furthermore, morbidly obese patients undergoing posterior fusion sustained more wound complications and postoperative infections.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study describes inpatient complications encountered during fusion surgery in patients who are obese. For a given surgical approach, patients with higher body mass index sustain increased transfusion requirements and utilize more resources during thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fusion. Nevertheless, the findings of equivalent mortality, length of stay, and other complication rates suggest that patients who are obese remain safe surgical candidates.

[Operative management and fracture care of the lower leg with the Ilizarov fixator in morbidly obese patients: literature review and results]

Given the rising prevalence of obesity, surgeons and hospitals must become more familiar with the treatment and operative management of obese patients. Several additional pre- and postoperative considerations must be involved such as appropriate assessment of comorbidities and requirements for special equipment. There are still very few data regarding morbidly obese patients with BMIs >50 kg/m(2). After a general literature review of operative management of obese patients, we report on fracture care of the lower limb in such patients with custom-made Ilizarov ring fixators. We found them suited to bear enormous weight-loading but that associated comborbidities can limit successful fracture care.

Complications of acetabular fracture surgery in morbidly obese patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the early complications with operative treatment of acetabular fractures in morbidly obese (body mass index >or=40) patients when compared with all other patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

University medical center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with acetabular fractures operatively treated by a single surgeon. Forty-one of these patients were morbidly obese (group 1) and were compared with the remaining patients (group 2). Group 2, therefore, included patients who were clinically overweight and obese.

INTERVENTION

Operative repair of acetabular fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Outcome variables included patient positioning time, total operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, perioperative complications, and late complications.

RESULTS

The average total operative time was 293 minutes for group 1 and 250 minutes (P = 0.008) for group 2. The hospital stay for group 1 averaged 26 days versus 15 days in group 2 (P < 0.01). There were 19 (46%) wound complications in group 1 compared with 49 (12%) in group 2 (P < 0.0001). Overall, there were complications in 26 of the 41 patients (63%) in group 1 and in 96 of the 394 patients (24%) in group 2. Group 1's relative risk of having a complication was 2.6 (95% confidence interval = 2.4-2.8) when compared with group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our morbidly obese population had a statistically higher complication rate, longer operative times, and greater estimated intraoperative blood loss. The majority of complications were related primarily to wound healing problems and successfully controlled with aggressive approach to surgical debridement.

Relationship between knee anthropometry and surgical time in total knee arthroplasty in severely and morbidly obese patients: a new prognostic index of surgical difficulty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe and morbid obesity is one of the current challenges in prosthetic knee surgery. The body mass index (BMI) is used to identify patients who may present difficulties during surgery and postoperative complications. We carried out a prospective study with an initial hypothesis that BMI is not associated with tourniquet time in obese patients undergoing TKA and that some anthropometric parameters may be useful in predicting tourniquet time in severely and morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis with BMI > or =35 kg/m(2) scheduled for TKA were prospectively studied. Suprapatellar, infrapatellar, and supra/infrapatellar anthropometric indexes were calculated before surgery. The tourniquet time was determined.

RESULTS

The mean BMI was 39.81 kg/m(2) (SD +/- 3.75). A total of 58% of patients were classified as class III obesity (BMI 35-39.99) and 42% as class IV (BMI > or = 40) Mean tourniquet time was 41.67 min (SD +/- 9.26). There was no association between the BMI and tourniquet time. The suprapatellar index was negatively associated with tourniquet time (p < 0.038).

DISCUSSION

The BMI is not the only parameter that should be considered in order to identify severely and morbidly obese patients who may have more surgical difficulties during TKA. Preoperative determination of the suprapatellar index helped us to classify these patients according to the morphology of the knee and predicted a longer tourniquet time and, therefore, greater surgical difficulty, in patients with a suprapatellar ratio below 1.6 in this study.

Perioperative medical comorbidities in the orthopaedic patient

Evaluation and management of medical comorbidities in the perioperative period can help improve surgical morbidity and mortality. Perioperative evaluation essentially is risk assessment and minimization. Patients undergoing orthopaedic treatment may benefit from temporizing measures to reduce systemic complications associated with some procedures. Patients at increased risk of cardiac ischemia should undergo risk stratification to determine possible perioperative interventions. Use of perioperative medications and/or consultation with specialists can help to address heart murmurs, bacterial endocarditis, prior stenting, heart failure, and hypertension. Patients with severe or unstable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease require the involvement of pulmonary care specialists. Renal failure can require nephrology consultation, particularly in cases of worsening renal function or urinary outflow obstruction. Hematologic considerations include bleeding and clotting. Prophylaxis should be used in patients with risk factors for peptic ulcer, as well as respiratory failure and hypotension. Nutritional status and liver disease also must be monitored and treated preoperatively. Orthopaedic diabetic patients should be placed on modified oral hypoglycemic or insulin regimens; recalcitrant cases merit consultation. Effective communication among all members of the patient's caregiving team is paramount.

Surgery in older people: an update

In the past two decades, the rate of surgery in older people has increased more rapidly than the rate of aging of the population, so both a larger proportion and a greater number of older people are now undergoing surgery. This may partly reflect a cultural change in surgery and anaesthesia with respect to a greater willingness to undertake elective procedures in older people, although there remain areas where they have less access to surgery than do younger patients. For instance, older people are less likely to undergo operative procedures after a cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, in those who do have surgery, resection rate (i.e. curative therapy) is lower than in younger people with equivalent tumour stages, and even more so in older patients with COPD, cardiovascular disease or diabetes. This article explores the complex relationship between age and surgical outcome, provides an evidence-based overview of risk assessment and common postoperative problems in older people, and summarizes good practice points (at times necessarily pragmatic) for clinical management of the older surgical patient. There has been a substantial expansion in the literature examining risks, outcomes and interventions in older surgical patients since the previous review article of this subject published in this journal. Although we do not cover anaesthesia in older people, the review of that topic remains relevant. The American Society of Anaesthesiologists' Classification of Risk which illustrates that risk is disease- rather than age- based, is shown in Table 1. Most publications examine elective rather than emergency surgery in older people (with the exception of hip fracture), and this is reflected in the content of the paper.