Understanding implicit sensorimotor adaptation as a process of proprioceptive re-alignment

Memory decay and generalization following distinct motor learning mechanisms

Motor skill learning is considered to arise out of contributions from multiple learning mechanisms, including error-based learning (EBL), use-dependent learning (UDL), and reinforcement learning (RL). These learning mechanisms exhibit dissociable roles and engage different neural circuits during skill acquisition. However, it remains largely unknown how a newly formed motor memory acquired through each learning mechanism decays over time and whether distinct learning mechanisms produce different generalization patterns. Here, we used variants of reaching paradigms that dissociated these learning mechanisms to examine the time course of memory decay following each learning and the generalization patterns of each learning. We found that motor memories acquired through these learning mechanisms decayed as a function of time. Notably, 15 min, 6 h, and 24 h after acquisition, the memory of EBL decayed much greater than that of RL. The memory acquired through UDL faded away within a few minutes. Motor memories formed through EBL and RL for given movement directions generalized to untrained movement directions, with the generalization of EBL being greater than that of RL. In contrast, motor memory of UDL could not generalize to untrained movement directions. These results suggest that distinct learning mechanisms exhibit different patterns of memory decay and generalization.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Motor skill learning is likely to involve error-based learning, use-dependent plasticity, and operant reinforcement. Here, we showed that these dissociable learning mechanisms exhibited distinct patterns of memory decay and generalization. With a better understanding of the characteristics of these learning mechanisms, it becomes possible to regulate each learning process separately to improve neurological rehabilitation.

Reduced feedback barely slows down proprioceptive recalibration

Introducing altered visual feedback of the hand produces quick adaptation of reaching movements. Our lab has shown that the associated shifts in estimates of the felt position of the hand saturate within a few training trials. The current study investigates whether the rapid changes in felt hand position that occur during classic visuomotor adaptation are diminished or slowed when training feedback is reduced. We reduced feedback by either providing visual feedback only at the end of the reach (terminal feedback) or constraining hand movements to reduce motor adaptation-related error signals such as sensory prediction errors and task errors (exposure). We measured changes as participants completed reaches with a 30° rotation, a -30° rotation, and clamped visual feedback, with these two "impoverished" training conditions, along with classic visuomotor adaptation training, while continuously estimating their felt hand position. Training with terminal feedback slightly reduced the initial rate of change in overall adaptation. However, the rate of change in hand localization, as well as the asymptote of hand localization shifts in both the terminal feedback group and the exposure training group was not noticeably different from those in the classic training group. Taken together, shifts in felt hand position are rapid and robust responses to sensory mismatches and are at best slightly modulated when feedback is reduced. This suggests that given the speed and invariance to the quality of feedback of proprioceptive recalibration, it could immediately contribute to all kinds of reach adaptation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reaching to targets with altered visual feedback about hand position leads to adaptation of movements as well as shifts in estimates of felt hand position. Felt hand position can shift in as little as one trial, and here we show that there is no noticeable reduction in speed when the feedback about movements is impoverished, indicating the robustness of the process of recalibrating felt hand position.

Contextual effects in sensorimotor adaptation adhere to associative learning rules

Traditional associative learning tasks focus on the formation of associations between salient events and arbitrary stimuli that predict those events. This is exemplified in cerebellar-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning, where arbitrary cues such as a tone or light act as conditioned stimuli (CSs) that predict aversive sensations at the cornea (unconditioned stimulus [US]). Here, we ask if a similar framework could be applied to another type of cerebellar-dependent sensorimotor learning - sensorimotor adaptation. Models of sensorimotor adaptation posit that the introduction of an environmental perturbation results in an error signal that is used to update an internal model of a sensorimotor map for motor planning. Here, we take a step toward an integrative account of these two forms of cerebellar-dependent learning, examining the relevance of core concepts from associative learning for sensorimotor adaptation. Using a visuomotor adaptation reaching task, we paired movement-related feedback (US) with neutral auditory or visual contextual cues that served as CSs. Trial-by-trial changes in feedforward movement kinematics exhibited three key signatures of associative learning: differential conditioning, sensitivity to the CS-US interval, and compound conditioning. Moreover, after compound conditioning, a robust negative correlation was observed between responses to the two elemental CSs of the compound (i.e. overshadowing), consistent with the additivity principle posited by theories of associative learning. The existence of associative learning effects in sensorimotor adaptation provides a proof-of-concept for linking cerebellar-dependent learning paradigms within a common theoretical framework.