Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial

The immune response to tumors as a tool toward immunotherapy

Until recently cancer medical therapy was limited to chemotherapy that could not differentiate cancer cells from normal cells. More recently with the remarkable mushroom of immunology, newer tools became available, resulting in the novel possibility to attack cancer with the specificity of the immune system. Herein we will review some of the recent achievement of immunotherapy in such aggressive cancers as melanoma, prostatic cancer, colorectal carcinoma, and hematologic malignancies. Immunotherapy of tumors has developed several techniques: immune cell transfer, vaccines, immunobiological molecules such as monoclonal antibodies that improve the immune responses to tumors. This can be achieved by blocking pathways limiting the immune response, such as CTLA-4 or Tregs. Immunotherapy may also use cytokines especially proinflammatory cytokines to enhance the activity of cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) derived from tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The role of newly discovered cytokines remains to be investigated. Alternatively, an other mechanism consists in enhancing the expression of TAAs on tumor cells. Finally, monoclonal antibodies may be used to target oncogenes.

Combinational therapy: new hope for pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a low overall survival rate. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for patients presenting with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine achieves a modest improvement in overall survival and is the gold standard for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Capecitabine and S-1, derivatives of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), offers minimal clinical benefits. Folfirinox represents a new and aggressive regimen that might benefit patients of metastatic pancreatic cancer with good performance status. Other chemotherapy drugs such as platinums and irinotecan do not provide significant improvement in overall survival, but have been used as part of combinational therapies. Comparing to systemically delivered chemotherapy, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy achieves higher local drug concentration in tumors with lower systemic drug toxicity, and may serve as a better treatment regimen. Although there have been progress made in chemotherapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer, the overall survival is not significantly improved in the last decade. Recently, development of chemotherapy in combination with molecular targeted therapies holds great promise in pancreatic cancer treatment, especially in patients with metastatic disease. Growing bodies of preclinical and clinical evidences indicate that the combination of conventional modalities with specific molecular targeted therapy increase the efficacy of the monotherapy without an increase in toxicity. In this review, we summarized the current regimens of chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and highlighted the novel combinational treatments tested in recent clinical trials.

Combined analysis of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 expression predicts survival of pancreatic carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) improves survival in some patients, the effectiveness varies by individual, and the results remain unsatisfying. The aim of this study was to investigate whether intratumoral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1) expression can predict the survival of PDAC patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GEM+S-1) chemotherapy.

METHODS

Intratumoral DPD and hENT1 expression were examined by immunohistochemistry in 86 PDAC patients who received adjuvant GEM+S-1 chemotherapy after surgical resection (all R0 or R1). Relationships between clinicopathologic factors, including DPD and hENT1 expression, and disease-free or overall survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

DPD and hENT1 expression had no significant relationship with any other clinicopathologic factors. A multivariate disease-free survival analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90: 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-5.90; P = 0.001), DPD expression (HR 2.47; 95% CI 1.37-4.44; P = 0.003), and hENT1 expression (HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.37-4.64; P = 0.004) as independent factors. Multivariate overall survival analysis also identified pT factor (HR 3.47; 95% CI 1.08-15.8; P = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.01-4.57; P = 0.04), DPD expression (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.06-3.71; P = 0.03), and hENT1 expression (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.10-4.19; P = 0.02) as independent factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined analysis of DPD and hENT1 expression predicts the survival of PDAC patients treated with adjuvant GEM+S-1 chemotherapy.

Partial pancreatic resection for pancreatic malignancy is associated with sustained pancreatic exocrine failure and reduced quality of life: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic resection for cancer may produce pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), which is poorly understood. This study examined the coefficient of fat absorption (CFA), symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and the accuracy of faecal elastase-1 (FE-1) measurement to predict PEI.

METHODS

Forty patients were analysed following resection for pancreatic malignancy. The primary endpoint was PEI diagnosis defined by CFA <93%; secondary endpoints were PEI diagnosis using FE-1 <200 μg/g, body mass index (BMI), and symptom and QoL analysis. Interventions were 3-day stool collection, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 1) questionnaire and patient's diary, at 6 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

CFA <93% was present in 67% of patients at 6 weeks and in 55% at 12 months. PEI using FE-1 was present in 77 and 83% of patients, respectively. No significant changes between time-points were observed. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for FE-1 in detecting CFA <93% were 91, 35, 70, 71 and 70%, respectively. CFA and FE-1 levels were uncorrelated. Overall, QoL increased at 6 (p = 0.0212) and 12 (p < 0.0001) months after surgery, mainly driven by physical, role and social functioning, and by appetite. Importantly, however, BMI and symptoms were unaffected by PEI, which suggests a subclinical presentation; such patients had attributes indicating poorer QoL (notably insomnia, p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

PEI was common and sustained following resection and not associated with significant symptoms. These patients had a tendency toward poorer QoL. FE-1 is a poor surrogate for diagnosing impaired fat absorption. Postoperative pancreatic enzyme replacement should be considered more routinely. and IAP.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy

After a lengthy search for an effective treatment for resected pancreatic cancer, evidence accumulated in the past 10 years shows that adjuvant chemotherapy is firmly established as offering a modest but real improvement in overall survival. However, the optimal choice of treatment modality (chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy) remains highly controversial. Results from ongoing studies will further optimize the treatment over the next decade.

Looking to the future: biomarkers in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The incidence and mortality of pancreas cancer converge. There has been little advancement in the treatment of pancreas cancer since the acceptance of gemcitabine as the standard therapy. Unfortunately, the efficacy of gemcitabine is dismal. While there is much discussion for the development of biomarkers to help direct therapy in this area, there is little action to move them into clinical practice. Herein, we review potential pancreatic cancer biomarkers and discuss the limitations in their implementation.

Immunohistochemical analysis of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) predicts survival in resected pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine is a promising adjuvant treatment for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) is the major transporter responsible for gemcitabine uptake into cells. The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine the relationship between the outcome of pancreatic cancer after surgery followed by postoperative gemcitabine monotherapy and the expression of hENT1.

METHODS

A total of 27 resected pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant gemcitabine were analyzed for tumor hENT1 expression via an immunohistochemical analysis. The staining intensity and the percentage of positive tumor cells were scored, and the composite score (hENT1 score) was obtained by obtaining the sum of these two scores.

RESULTS

There were 11 patients assigned to the low hENT1 expression group, and 16 patients to the high hENT1 group. The patients with tumors that had higher hENT1 expression had a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) (log rank, P = 0.022) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.024). The hENT1 expression was indicated to be a significant and independent prognostic factor for OS by the univariate (P = 0.030) and multivariate analyses (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

A high expression of hENT1 in pancreatic cancer was found to be significantly associated with a longer survival in patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine monotherapy after curative resection, and hENT1 immunohistochemistry may well serve as a significant prognostic factor for these patients.

Advances in pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review intends to describe recent studies on the interaction between pancreatic cancer cells and tumor stroma, and potential opportunities and limitations to therapeutically targeting the stroma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreatic cancer is characterized by densely desmoplastic stroma. It is becoming increasingly clear that there are complex and mutually supportive interactions between cancer cells and the stroma. Specific signaling pathways exist between cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts that contribute to hypoxic desmoplasia. Recent developments in therapeutic approaches to targeting the stroma have demonstrated potential for enhancing efficacy of cytotoxic therapies. However, the heterogeneity and genomic complexity between tumors has also become more evident based on recent findings. There is increasing evidence for hierarchy of cancer cells with identification of a subpopulation of cancer stem cells that are inherently resistant to traditional therapies.

SUMMARY

Targeting pancreatic cancer stroma is a novel therapeutic strategy that appears justified based on recent studies; however, continued focus is needed to develop more effective therapies against cells resistant to standard chemotherapy.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma: where are we going?

Evaluation of: Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs. gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304(10), 1073-1081 (2010). Over the last decade, adjuvant therapy in the treatment of resected pancreas adenocarcinoma has had its value established. Such treatment incrementally increases 5-year survivorship and delays time to tumor recurrence. The backbone of adjuvant therapy is the single-agent gemcitabine, based primarily on results from the Charité Onkologie Clinical (CONKO)-001 study. Based on the combined results of the European Study Group for Pancreas Cancer (ESPAC)-1 and ESPAC-3 trials, Neoptolemos and colleagues have established both bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin and gemcitabine as standard options for resected pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine remains the main standard therapy based on its ease of administration and a more favorable toxicity profile; however, there is now a clearly validated alternate option of 5-fluororuacil and leucovorin based on the results of ESPAC-3. Moving forward, the integration of novel cytotoxic and targeted agents into adjuvant therapy, along with refining the role of neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable pancreas cancer, will hopefully accrue a more substantial improvement in outcome for patients with resected pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Current treatment options for pancreatic carcinoma

Pancreas cancer is a significant cause of cancer mortality; therefore, the development of early diagnostic strategies and effective treatment is essential. Improvements in imaging technology, as well as use of biomarkers such as CA 19-9, are changing the way that pancreas cancer is diagnosed and staged. Although progress in treatment for pancreas cancer has been incremental, development of combination therapies involving both chemotherapeutic and biologic agents is ongoing. This article reviews current strategies in the diagnosis and treatment of resectable and advanced pancreas cancer.

Pancreatic cancer

Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the biology of pancreatic cancer, and advances in patients' management have also taken place. Evidence is beginning to show that screening first-degree relatives of individuals with several family members affected by pancreatic cancer can identify non-invasive precursors of this malignant disease. The incidence of and number of deaths caused by pancreatic tumours have been gradually rising, even as incidence and mortality of other common cancers have been declining. Despite developments in detection and management of pancreatic cancer, only about 4% of patients will live 5 years after diagnosis. Survival is better for those with malignant disease localised to the pancreas, because surgical resection at present offers the only chance of cure. Unfortunately, 80-85% of patients present with advanced unresectable disease. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer responds poorly to most chemotherapeutic agents. Hence, we need to understand the biological mechanisms that contribute to development and progression of pancreatic tumours. In this Seminar we will discuss the most common and deadly form of pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

An oncolytic adenovirus defective in pRb-binding (dl922-947) can efficiently eliminate pancreatic cancer cells and tumors in vivo in combination with 5-FU or gemcitabine

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis and frequently develops resistance to standard chemotherapeutics. Oncolytic adenoviruses represent a promising approach to overcome treatment resistance. The replication-selective dl922-947 adenovirus, defective in pRb binding, targets cancers with deregulated cell cycle control, such as the majority of pancreatic tumors. Cell killing efficacy was higher for dl922-947 than for adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) and the clinically approved dl1520 in pancreatic cancer cells with K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations. Combinations of dl922-947 and 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine (2'2'-difluoro-2-deoxytidine) resulted in strong synergistic cell killing in Suit-2 and the highly drug- and virus-resistant Hs766T cells. Viral uptake increased in response to drugs, but was independent of the expression levels of the viral attachment receptor coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR), whereas expression levels of the internalization receptors α(v)β(3)- and α(v)β(5)-integrins were increased. Early viral E1A expression was potently induced with drugs contributing to the synergistic effects. The dl922-947 mutant was more efficacious than Ad5 in vivo in Hs766T and Suit-2 xenograft models. In combination with gemcitabine, median survival was further prolonged. We demonstrate that dl922-947 is highly efficacious in pancreatic cancers and conclude that oncolytic adenoviruses harboring the E1ACR2 deletion have great potential for development into future clinical candidates for pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant gemcitabine versus NEOadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study)

BACKGROUND

Despite major improvements in the perioperative outcome of pancreas surgery, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer after curative resection remains poor. Adjuvant chemotherapy increases disease-free and overall survival, but this treatment cannot be offered to a significant proportion of patients due to the surgical morbidity. In contrast, almost all patients can receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. This treatment is safe and effective, and has resulted in a median survival of 26.5 months in a recent phase II trial. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the nutritional status of patients with pancreatic cancer. This multicenter phase III trial (NEOPAC) has been designed to explore the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a prospective randomized phase III trial. Patients with resectable cytologically proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head are eligible for this study. All patients must be at least 18 years old and must provide written informed consent. An infiltration of the superior mesenteric vein > 180° or major visceral arteries are considered exclusion criteria. Eligible patients will be randomized to surgery followed by adjuvant gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) for 6 months or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2)) followed by surgery and the same adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given four times every two weeks. The staging as well as the restaging protocol after neoadjuvant chemotherapy include computed tomography of chest and abdomen and diagnostic laparoscopy. The primary study endpoint is progression-free survival. According to the sample size calculation, 155 patients need to be randomized to each treatment arm. Disease recurrence will be documented by scheduled computed tomography scans 9, 12, 15, 21 and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression. For quality control, circumferential resection margins are marked intraoperatively, and representative histological sections will be centrally reviewed by a dedicated pathologist.

DISCUSSION

The NEOPAC study will determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer for the first time and offers a unique potential for translational research. Furthermore, this trial will provide the unbiased overall survival of all patients undergoing surgery for resectable cancer of the pancreatic head.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicalTrials.gov NCT01314027.

A multicenter analysis of GTX chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Studies treating adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with gemcitabine alone or in combination with a doublet have demonstrated modest improvements in survival. Recent reports have suggested that using the triple-drug regimen FOLFIRINOX can substantially extend survival in patients with metastatic disease. We were interested in determining the clinical benefit of another three-drug regimen of gemcitabine, docetaxel and capecitabine (GTX) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Patients and methods

The cases of 154 patients, who received treatment with GTX chemotherapy with histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, were retrospectively reviewed. All demographic and clinical data were captured including prior therapy, adverse events, treatment response and survival.

Results

One hundred and seventeen metastatic and 37 locally advanced cases of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were reviewed. Partial responses were noted in 11% of cases, and stable disease was observed in 62% of patients. Responses significantly correlated with toxicity (neutropenia, ALT elevation and hospitalizations). Grade 3 or greater hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were noted in 41% and 9% of cases, respectively. Overall median survival was 11.6 months. Chemotherapy naïve patients with metastatic and locally advanced disease achieved a median survival of 11.3 and 25.0 months, respectively.

Conclusions

We observe a substantial survival benefit with GTX chemotherapy in our cohort of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These findings warrant further investigation of this combination in this patient population.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-011-1704-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gemcitabine-associated "pseudocellulitis" and "pseudosepsis": a case report and review of the literature

Chemotherapeutic agents have been associated with sepsis and a variety of opportunistic and nonopportunistic infections. This was attributed to their immunosuppressive effects. Like all other chemotherapeutic agents, the use of gemcitabine has been associated with different infectious processes, yet many conditions that mimic infections have also been linked to its use. Pseudosepsis is a condition that should be added to these previously described conditions, such as gemcitabine-induced pseudocellulitis. We describe a patient who suffered from 2 different gemcitabine-induced adverse events including pseudocellulitis that was not related to prior lymphedema or radiation recall phenomenon and pseudosepsis wherein antibiotics have no role in the treatment, and the discontinuation of the offending agent resulted in the resolution of the patient's symptoms.

Chemoradiation therapy in the management of gastrointestinal malignancies

Concurrent administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been increasingly used in cancer treatment, leading to improvements in survival as well as quality of life. Currently, it is a feasible preference, often regarded as the standard therapeutic option, for many locally confined solid tumors, including anal, bladder, cervical, esophageal, gastric, head and neck, lung, pancreatic and rectal cancers. In patients with these tumors, combined modality therapy improves local tumor control and survival while, in some instances, obviating the need for surgical removal of the organ of origin. The scientific rationale for the use of chemoradiation derives from the preclinical and clinical observations of synergistic interactions between radiotherapy and chemotherapy. When chemotherapy and radiotherapy are administered together, the chemotherapeutic agents can sensitize the cancer cells to the effects of ionizing radiation, leading to increased tumor-killing effects within the radiotherapy field. This, in turn, can improve local control of the primary tumor and, in some cancers, render surgical resection unnecessary. In other cases, patients with tumors that were initially considered unresectable are able to undergo curative interventions after completing chemoradiation. The chemotherapy component can address any potential micrometastatic disease that, without therapy, leads to an increased risk of distant recurrence. A large body of evidence exists that supports the use of chemoradiotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers. In fact, one of the first tumor types in which the superior efficacy of chemoradiation was described was anal cancer. Since then, chemoradiotherapy has been explored in other gastrointestinal malignancies with superior outcomes when compared with either radiation or chemotherapy alone. This article aims to recapitulate the clinical evidence supporting the use of chemoradiotherapy in a variety of gastrointestinal tumor types.

New developments in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma presents in an advanced stage and has a dismal prognosis. Extensive recent research efforts have provided us with greater insight into the etiology of pancreatic cancer and have also improved our means of prognostication. Molecular analysis demonstrated that specific pathways involved in pancreatic carcinogenesis are perhaps more valuable to study than single genetic aberrations. Previous risk factors, including family history, body mass index, and current cigarette smoking, were validated and novel risks, such as ABO blood group alleles, were identified. Similar to other illnesses, combinations of healthful habits, such as not smoking, adhering to a Mediterranean dietary pattern, and engaging in physical activity, may decrease pancreatic cancer risk. Finally, CA 19-9 levels, the presence of diabetes mellitus, and a six-gene signature provided critical information regarding survival that could help guide treatment of individuals diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic cancer

Substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the biology of pancreatic cancer, and advances in patients' management have also taken place. Evidence is beginning to show that screening first-degree relatives of individuals with several family members affected by pancreatic cancer can identify non-invasive precursors of this malignant disease. The incidence of and number of deaths caused by pancreatic tumours have been gradually rising, even as incidence and mortality of other common cancers have been declining. Despite developments in detection and management of pancreatic cancer, only about 4% of patients will live 5 years after diagnosis. Survival is better for those with malignant disease localised to the pancreas, because surgical resection at present offers the only chance of cure. Unfortunately, 80-85% of patients present with advanced unresectable disease. Furthermore, pancreatic cancer responds poorly to most chemotherapeutic agents. Hence, we need to understand the biological mechanisms that contribute to development and progression of pancreatic tumours. In this Seminar we will discuss the most common and deadly form of pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Medical treatment of pancreatic cancer: new hopes after 10 years of gemcitabine

Exocrine pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. R0 resection of the tumor is to date the only potentially curative approach, but less than 20% of patients are eligible for a curative surgery at diagnosis. Until recently, gemcitabine was the standard treatment for advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer patients, since it was shown more than a decade ago to induce clinical benefit and to improve survival when compared to weekly bolus 5-fluorouracil. In order to improve patients' outcome many trials have, during the last 10 years, explored the pharmacokinetic modulation of gemcitabine and combination therapies with gemcitabine and other anti-cancer agents with consistent negative results. It is finally a trial assessing the efficacy of a combination chemotherapy without gemcitabine: the FOLFIRINOX regimen, reported this year, that has shown for the first time a significant improvement in progression free and overall survivals. In parallel, many trials testing new targeted agents in these patients are currently ongoing. After 10 years without significant progress in the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients, the hope that a significant improvement in the outcome of these patients can be achieved has been raised.

Systemic therapy for elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer

The majority of patients with gastrointestinal cancers are over the age of 65. This age group comprises the minority of the patients enrolled in clinical trials, and it is unknown whether older patients achieve similar results as younger patients in terms of survival benefit and tolerability. In addition, there are few studies specifically designed for patients over 65 years. Subset analyses of individual trials and studies using pooled patient data from multiple trials provide some understanding on outcomes in older patients with gastrointestinal cancers. This article reviews the evidence on chemotherapeutic regimens in the elderly with colorectal, pancreatic, and gastroesophageal cancers, and discusses a practical approach to provide the best outcomes for older patients.

Resection benefits older adults with locoregional pancreatic cancer despite greater short-term morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate time trends in surgical resection rates and operative mortality in older adults diagnosed with locoregional pancreatic cancer and to determine the effect of age on surgical resection rates and 2-year survival after surgical resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and linked Medicare claims database (1992-2005).

SETTING

Secondary data analysis of population-based tumor registry and linked claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older diagnosed with locoregional pancreatic cancer (N=9,553), followed from date of diagnosis to time of death or censorship.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of participants undergoing surgical resection, 30-day operative mortality after resection, and 2-year survival according to age group.

RESULTS

Surgical resection rates increased significantly, from 20% in 1992 to 29% in 2005, whereas 30-day operative mortality rates decreased from 9% to 5%. After controlling for multiple factors, participants were less likely to be resected with older age. Resection was associated with lower hazard of death, regardless of age, with hazard ratios of 0.46, 0.51, 0.47, 0.43, and 0.35 for resected participants younger than 70, 70 to 74, 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 and older respectively compared with unresected participants younger than 70 (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

With older age, fewer people with pancreatic cancer undergo surgical resection, even after controlling for comorbidity and other factors. This study demonstrated increased resection rates over time in all age groups, along with lower surgical mortality rates. Despite previous reports of greater morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection in older adults, the benefit of resection does not diminish with older age in selected people.

Resection benefits older adults with locoregional pancreatic cancer despite greater short-term morbidity and mortality

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate time trends in surgical resection rates and operative mortality in older adults diagnosed with locoregional pancreatic cancer and to determine the effect of age on surgical resection rates and 2-year survival after surgical resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and linked Medicare claims database (1992-2005).

SETTING

Secondary data analysis of population-based tumor registry and linked claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 and older diagnosed with locoregional pancreatic cancer (N=9,553), followed from date of diagnosis to time of death or censorship.

MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of participants undergoing surgical resection, 30-day operative mortality after resection, and 2-year survival according to age group.

RESULTS

Surgical resection rates increased significantly, from 20% in 1992 to 29% in 2005, whereas 30-day operative mortality rates decreased from 9% to 5%. After controlling for multiple factors, participants were less likely to be resected with older age. Resection was associated with lower hazard of death, regardless of age, with hazard ratios of 0.46, 0.51, 0.47, 0.43, and 0.35 for resected participants younger than 70, 70 to 74, 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and 85 and older respectively compared with unresected participants younger than 70 (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

With older age, fewer people with pancreatic cancer undergo surgical resection, even after controlling for comorbidity and other factors. This study demonstrated increased resection rates over time in all age groups, along with lower surgical mortality rates. Despite previous reports of greater morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection in older adults, the benefit of resection does not diminish with older age in selected people.

A novel antiangiogenic approach for adjuvant therapy of pancreatic carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Surgical therapy remains the only curative option for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. But even after complete resection, almost all patients suffer from local tumor recurrence. Current standard adjuvant therapy with gemcitabine does not impressively affect the recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel anti-angiogenic adjuvant treatment strategy by targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR). We assayed the effects of a novel VEGFR inhibitor (ZK261991) on pancreatic carcinoma. ZK261991 is a highly selective and potent VEGFR-kinase inhibitor, which is orally available.

METHODS

We used a previously established nude mouse orthotopic pancreatic cancer resection model. Subcutaneous donor tumor fragments (1 mm(3)) derived from human pancreatic cancer cell lines HPAF-2 and AsPC-1 were implanted in the pancreatic tail of 48 nude mice. Fourteen days afterwards, all mice underwent a histologically confirmed curative tumor resection followed by daily adjuvant oral therapy with ZK261991 (50 mg/kg; n = 24) vs. placebo (n = 24). The mice were sacrificed after 12 weeks of therapy or in case of defined endpoints. All sacrificed mice underwent autopsy. A dissemination score (local and systemic tumor spread), size of recurrent tumor mass, survival, and weight loss/gain were surveyed.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival showed a significant benefit for mice treated with ZK261991 after HPAF-2 tumor resection: 83.8 days (95% CI 73.9-93.6) vs. 60.9 days (95% CI 48.9-73.0), p = 0.006. Adjuvant treatment with ZK261991 of AsPC-1-derived tumors showed a tendency towards a benefit compared to control but no significant difference: 75.8 days (95% CI 59.7-91.9) vs. 65.7 days (95% CI 51.6-79.7). There were no significant differences in dissemination score and size of recurrent tumor mass between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant anti-angiogenic therapy with the novel VEGFR-inhibitor ZK261991 resulted in a significant survival benefit after curative tumor resection in a clinically relevant orthotopic animal model of pancreatic cancer. Combination of anti-angiogenic treatment with cytotoxic agents may further improve the results of adjuvant therapy.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma--are we forcing a milestone?

Survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is low and the role of adjuvant therapy remains controversial, with the European studies indicating survival benefit of chemotherapy over chemoradiation, whereas the American reports indicate an undoubted benefit with chemoradiation. Whatever is the mode of adjuvant care, two things are obvious in the management of this disease: surgery is the mainstay of treatment and a complete resection is the only hope of cure. Secondly, irrespective of the adjuvant treatment modality, survival advantage is limited and five-year survival has failed to reach that of other malignancies. The mixed results obtained from the various adjuvant therapy trials indicate that a uniform protocol is yet to be reached. A milestone is said to have been reached when a treatment or a treatment modality revolutionizes the outcome of a disease. As of now the adjuvant treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma is still evolving. Maybe a fresh look is needed at the biological aspect of the disease to add a new thought in its management, as has happened with other human malignancies.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer: what can we really predict today?

Managing pancreatic cancer remains a big challenge due to its worse course and prognosis. However, therapeutic options and multimodal strategies are increasing nowadays, including new agents, new regimens and chemoradiation. Recently, the FOLFIRTNOX regimen has been reported to be more active than gemcitabine in selected metastatic patients. In this setting, it will be of utmost interest to guide our therapeutic choice not only on clinical and pathological findings, but also on specific biomarkers that will predict tumor behavior and patient outcome (prognostic markers), and benefit from specific agents or regimens (predictive markers). In the near future, we will have to build both our therapeutic interventions and our clinical research based on an accurate patients' clinical selection and on biomolecular markers. In this review, we aimed to highlight and discuss some of the recent results reported on biomarkers in pancreatic cancer that may predict, i.e., preferential metastatic diffusion after surgery, like CXCR4, or predict gemcitabine efficacy in an adjuvant setting as well as in advanced disease, like hENT1. An important effort for translational research in pancreatic cancer research is thus required to validate such markers, while some important questions concerning tissue availability and processing, methodology of analysis, and design of future prospective trials, need to be addressed.

Pancreatic cancer in 2010: new insights for early intervention and detection

Pancreatic cancer is usually detected at an advanced stage and responds poorly to treatment. In 2010 new insights were gained into understanding the complex biology of pancreatic cancer. Importantly, these insights offer novel opportunities for early diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

Modulatory effects of curcumin on multi-drug resistance-associated protein 5 in pancreatic cancer cells

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy of pancreatic cancer often fails due to the development of intrinsic and acquired resistance during drug treatment. Recent studies have suggested that MRP5 conferred resistance to first-line drugs 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine by active efflux of drugs from the cell. Our aim was to evaluate whether curcumin could reverse this multi-drug resistance by inhibition of MRP5-mediated efflux.

METHODS

MRP5 protein was detected and localized by immunocytochemistry using a monoclonal antibody in MRP5 over-expressing HEK293 (HEK293/MRP5) cells and two pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and MiaPaCa-2. The cellular accumulation of a specific MRP5 fluorescent substrate 2',7'-Bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) into these cells was measured by flow cytometry and the cell proliferation determined by a 72-h CyQuant assay.

RESULTS

The cellular accumulation of BCECF in HEK293/MRP5 cells and in PANC-1 and MiaPaCa-2 cells was significantly increased by curcumin in a concentration-dependent manner. Curcumin and a MRP5 inhibitor MK571 had no apparent effects on cellular accumulation of BCECF in parental HEK293 cells. In the proliferation assays, curcumin caused a concentration-dependant increase in the sensitivity to the cytotoxic drug 5-fluorouracil in HEK293/MRP5 cells, PANC-1 and MiaPaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells, but not in parental HEK293 cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that curcumin is an inhibitor of MRP5 and may be useful in the reversal of multi-drug resistance in pancreatic cancer chemotherapy.

Dietary factors and pancreatic cancer: the role of food bioactive compounds

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality among both men and women in the United States with a 5-year survival rate of only 4%. Several dietary factors may influence the risk of developing pancreatic cancer and its recurrence. Some of these factors may offer innovative therapies for prevention of this disease. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of pancreatic cancer, as well as current knowledge on the epidemiological, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies conducted about this disease using various dietary agents. The main focus is on food-based approaches for preventing this disease particularly, citrus fruits, and foods containing flavonoids, curcumin, folate and vitamin D.

Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer remains a major unsolved health problem, with conventional cancer treatments having little impact on disease course. Almost all patients who have pancreatic cancer develop metastases and die. The main risk factors are smoking, age, and some genetic disorders, although the primary causes are poorly understood. Advances in molecular biology have, however, greatly improved understanding of the pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. Many patients have mutations of the K-ras oncogene, and various tumour-suppressor genes are also inactivated. Growth factors also play an important part. However, disease prognosis is extremely poor. Around 15-20% of patients have resectable disease, but only around 20% of these survive to 5 years. For locally advanced, unresectable, and metastatic disease, treatment is palliative, although fluorouracil chemoradiation for locally advanced and gemcitabine chemotherapy for metastatic disease can provide palliative benefits. Despite pancreatic cancer's resistance to currently available treatments, new methods are being investigated. Preoperative chemoradiation is being advocated, with seemingly sound reasoning, and a wider role for gemcitabine is being explored. However, new therapeutic strategies based on the molecular biology of pancreatic cancer seem to hold the greatest promise.