S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:215-221. [PMID: 18282805 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70035-4]

Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The best chemotherapy regimen for metastatic gastric cancer is uncertain, but promising findings have been reported with irinotecan plus cisplatin and S-1 (tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydropyrimidine, and potassium oxonate). We aimed to investigate the superiority of irinotecan plus cisplatin and non-inferiority of S-1 compared with fluorouracil, with respect to overall survival, in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We undertook a phase 3 open label randomised trial in 34 institutions in Japan. We enrolled patients aged 20-75 years or younger, who had histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, and randomly assigned them by minimisation to receive either: a continuous infusion of fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2) per day, on days 1-5) every 4 weeks (n=234); intravenous irinotecan (70 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), on day 1) every 4 weeks (n=236); or oral S-1 (40 mg/m(2), twice a day, on days 1-28) every 6 weeks (n=234). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT00142350, and with UMIN-CTR, number C000000062.

FINDINGS

All randomised patients were included in the primary analysis. Median overall survival was 10.8 months (IQR 5.7-17.8) for individuals assigned fluorouracil, 12.3 months (8.1-19.5) for those allocated irinotecan plus cisplatin (hazard ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.70-1.04]; p=0.0552), and 11.4 months (6.4-21.3) for those assigned S-1 (0.83 [0.68-1.01]; p=0.0005 for non-inferiority). Three treatment-related deaths occurred in the irinotecan plus cisplatin group and one was recorded in the S-1 group.

INTERPRETATION

S-1 is non-inferior to fluorouracil and, in view of the convenience of an oral administration, could replace intravenous fluorouracil for treatment of unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer, at least in Asia. Irinotecan plus cisplatin is not superior to fluorouracil in this setting.

A long-time survivor of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer successfully treated by fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy: a case study

A 67-year-old male with advanced gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis as well as a tumor embolus in the portal vein was treated by S-1/cisplatin therapy. The serum alpha-fetoprotein levels were elevated to 836 ng/ml at the first visit. After one course of chemotherapy, the patient showed stable disease; the serum level of alpha-fetoprotein also decreased to 626 ng/ml after a transient increase, and therefore reduction surgery was performed. A total gastrectomy with a distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, and regional lymph node dissection was performed. The resected specimen was diagnosed to be alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer. There were no metastatic foci in the resected lymph nodes, presumably due to the preoperative chemotherapy. S-1/cisplatin therapy was continued after the operation to treat the remaining tumor embolus in the portal vein. After one course of this therapy, the tumor embolus disappeared. However, a lymph node measuring 1.5 cm in diameter appeared in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Therefore, the chemotherapy was changed to paclitaxel monotherapy. After 2 courses of paclitaxel monotherapy, the lymph node swelled, and thus 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine was added to the paclitaxel regimen. After 5 courses of this regimen, the lymph node swelling disappeared without any other new lesions and a total of 21 courses were performed. The patient remained stable for over 8 years without recurrence. The expression of chemoresistance-related proteins was retrospectively analyzed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate the chemoresistance. The ortate phosphoribosyltransferase expression was strongly positive, and the good outcome in this case may have been associated with this result.

Induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery for treatment of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination is poor. Recently, chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin has been shown to be highly effective for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In 41 patients diagnosed with either macro- or microscopic peritoneal dissemination by staging laparoscopy, and receiving induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin between August 2002 and February 2008, response of peritoneal lesions to the induction chemotherapy and the outcome of the following surgery were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 41 patients identified, 38 patients (93%) completed two cycles. Among grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, neutropenia was most frequently observed (9 patients; 22%). After chemotherapy, 32 patients (78%) underwent surgery and R0 resection was accomplished in 22 patients. Although objective response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was recorded in only four patients (10%), peritoneal dissemination disappeared in 19 patients (46%). Patients with limited peritoneal metastasis, negative peritoneal cytology, or response of the primary lesion were more likely to exhibit disappearance of the peritoneal dissemination. Median survival time of all patients was 20.4 months. Patients with R0 resection had median survival time of 43.2 months, which was significantly longer than for those with noncurative resection (12.6 months) or without surgery (10.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited peritoneal dissemination of gastric origin is highly sensitive to induction chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin. Resection after disappearance of peritoneal metastasis could cure some patients.

High expression of atypical protein kinase C lambda/iota in gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for recurrence

BACKGROUND

The atypical protein kinase C lambda/iota (aPKClambda/iota) is involved in several signal transduction pathways that influence cell growth, apoptosis, and the establishment and maintenance of epithelial cell polarity. Overexpression of aPKClambda/iota has been reported in several cancers and been shown to be associated with oncogenesis. However, the expression and role of aPKClambda/iota in gastric cancer, one of the commonest cancers in Asia, have not so far been investigated. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between aPKClambda/iota expression and the clinicopathological features of gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gastric adenocarcinoma samples were obtained from 177 patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Yokohama City University Hospital between 1999 and 2004. Expression of aPKClambda/iota and E: -cadherin was examined immunohistochemically and compared with clinicopathological features of the tumors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for both disease-specific and relapse-free survival.

RESULTS

Overexpression of aPKClambda/iota protein was detected in 126 of the 177 (71.2%) gastric cancers. Immunohistological staining for aPKClambda/iota was stronger in gastric adenocarcinoma of intestinal type than diffuse type (p = 0.036), but was not correlated with E: -cadherin expression. A multivariate analysis suggested that nodal metastasis and aPKClambda/iota overexpression were prognostic factors for disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that aPKClambda/iota overexpression was a strong prognostic factor for gastric adenocarcinoma recurrence. As well as being a new prognostic indicator, aPKClambda/iota is also likely to be a novel therapeutic target for gastric cancer.

Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (DOCETUX study)

BACKGROUND

The conventional treatment options for advanced gastric patients remain unsatisfactory in terms of response rate, response duration, toxicity, and overall survival benefit. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the activity and safety of cetuximab combined with cisplatin and docetaxel as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Untreated patients with histologically confirmed advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma received cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg m(-2) i.v. followed by weekly doses of 250 mg m(-2), cisplatin 75 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, docetaxel 75 mg m(-2) i.v. on day 1, every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles, and then cetuximab maintenance treatment was allowed in patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (stomach 81.9% and gastro-oesophageal junction 18.1%; locally advanced disease 4.2%; and metastatic disease 95.8%) were enrolled. The ORR was 41.2% (95% CI, 29.5-52.9). Median time to progression was 5 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.4). Median survival time was 9 months (95% CI, 7-11). The most frequent grades 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (44.4%). No toxic death was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cetuximab to the cisplatin/docetaxel regimen improved the ORR of the cisplatin/docetaxel doublet in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, but this combination did not improve the TTP and OS. The toxicity of cisplatin/docetaxel chemotherapy was not affected by the addition of cetuximab.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis is usually considered unresectable and so treated by chemotherapy. This trial explored the safety and efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy followed by extended surgery in the management of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis received two or three 28-day cycles of induction chemotherapy with irinotecan (70 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2) on day 1), and then underwent gastrectomy with curative intent with D2 plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Primary endpoints were 3-year overall survival and incidence of treatment-related death.

RESULTS

The study was terminated because of three treatment-related deaths when 55 patients had been enrolled (mortality rate above 5 per cent). Two deaths were due to myelosuppression and one to postoperative complications. Clinical response and R0 resection rates were 55 and 65 per cent respectively. The pathological response rate was 15 per cent. Median overall survival was 14.6 months and the 3-year survival rate 27 per cent.

CONCLUSION

This multimodal treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer provides reasonable 3-year survival compared with historical data, but at a considerable cost in terms of morbidity and mortality.

Is there a role for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer?

Gastric cancer remains one of the most common forms of cancer worldwide. Unfortunately, most patients will present with advanced-stage disease, and will therefore need palliative chemotherapy. Some chemotherapy regimens have been well established as first-line therapy, and have been shown to increase survival; however, almost all patients with metastatic gastric cancer will develop progressive disease after first-line therapy. With the availability of several active chemotherapy drugs, many patients who retain a good performance status after the initial treatment remain good candidates for additional therapy; however, no standard approach for second-line therapy exists. Many small, phase 2 trials have been done and the findings are variable. No data from randomised-controlled trials suggest a benefit of second-line chemotherapy compared with supportive care alone. We review the published data concerning the use of chemotherapy in the second-line setting for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Pre-operative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is highly prevalent in several countries around the world and remains an incurable disease. Treatment involves surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Surgical resection remains the definitive treatment for early stage (T1 and T2) gastric cancer, with 5-year survival rates of 70 - 95%. Localized tumours that extend beyond the submucosa are, however, associated with worse outcomes and a 5-year survival rate of 20 - 30%. Recent advances mainly concern chemotherapy prior to surgical resection. The goal of pre-operative chemotherapy is to allow an early attack on systemic micrometastatic disease and, by downstaging the primary tumour, to increase the percentage of patients able to undergo curative resection. Pre-operative chemotherapy remains experimental, but several phase II and III studies have shown promising results. One approach involves systemic, pre-operative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer. This review focuses on the development of pre-operative chemotherapy as a component of the multimodal treatment of gastric cancer.

Phase II study of S-1 as first-line treatment for elderly patients over 75 years of age with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

This prospective multicenter phase II study was carried out to investigate the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients over 75 years of age, with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients had measurable or evaluable lesions according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. S-1 (25-60 mg determined by the body surface area and creatinine clearance) was given orally, twice daily. A course of treatment consisted of 4-week administration followed by a 2-week rest period, and the patients received repeated courses.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. Pharmacokinetics of S-1 was studied in six patients, and the maximum plasma concentrations of respective metabolites after S-1 administration were found to be similar to those reported for younger cancer patients. The overall response rate in 33 patients was 21.2% (95% CI, 10.7-37.8%), and median progression-free survival was 3.9 months, with a median overall survival of 15.7 months. Frequently noted adverse events include leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia, and fatigue. As for serious adverse events, relatively higher frequencies of anemia (9%) and anorexia (12%) of grade 3 severity were found, but there were no grade 4 episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that S-1 monotherapy is safe and useful for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer when the dose is selected with caution, taking into account renal function.

Paclitaxel chemotherapy for the treatment of gastric cancer

A comprehensive review of phase I and phase II clinical trials of paclitaxel and paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer was performed. Response rates, median progression-free survivals, and median overall survivals were examined, together with the treatment regimens and the numbers of patients registered in each trial. Although paclitaxel monotherapy produced considerable improvement in tumor response and prognosis, combination doublet or triplet chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and/or platinum compounds showed better results than the paclitaxel monotherapy. With regard to the schedule of paclitaxel administration, weekly injection seemed to show less toxicity and better results than administration every 3 weeks. Adjuvant therapies, chemoradiation therapies, and paclitaxel treatment for gastric ascites were also investigated and are discussed.

New perspectives in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Metastatic gastric cancer remains an incurable disease, with a relative 5-year survival rate of 7%-27%. Chemotherapy, which improves overall survival (OS) and quality of life, is the main treatment option. Meta-analysis has demonstrated that the best survival results obtained in earlier randomized studies were achieved with three-drug regimens containing a fluoropyrimidine, an anthracycline, and cisplatin (ECF). Although there has been little progress in improving median OS times beyond the 9-mo plateau achievable with the standard regimens, the availability of newer agents has provided some measure of optimism. A number of new combinations incorporating docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and S-1 have been explored in randomized trials. Some combinations, such as epirubicin-oxaliplatin-capecitabine, have been shown to be as effective as (or perhaps more effective than) ECF, and promising early data have been derived for S-1 in combination with cisplatin. One factor that might contribute to extending median OS is the advancement whenever possible to second-line cytotoxic treatments. However, the biggest hope for significant survival advances in the near future would be the combination of new targeted biological agents with existing chemotherapy first-line regimens.

Feasibility of self-expandable metallic stent plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Self-expandable metallic stent placement is accepted as palliative therapy for advanced gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction, but data are lacking for chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent insertion. This study retrospectively compared results between surgery plus chemotherapy and stenting plus chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 26 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery or endoscopic stenting for metastatic gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis between April 2000 and December 2007 in four Japanese hospitals. Patients were categorized into two groups: 15 patients who received chemotherapy after surgery for pyloric stenosis (Surgery group); and 11 patients who received chemotherapy after self-expandable metallic stent placement for pyloric stenosis (Stent group).

RESULTS

Median survival time and median time to treatment failure were 284 days and 226 days in the Surgery group and 337 days and 247 days in the Stent group, respectively. No significant differences were noted between survival and time to treatment failure. No significant differences were found in median oral intake rate (Surgery, 93.1%; Stent, 93.2%) or median hospital stay rate (Surgery, 24.6%; Stent, 23.7%) during survival. Response rate was 45.5% in the Surgery group and 50% in the Stent group, with no significant difference. Likewise, no significant differences were noted between groups for frequencies of toxicity or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that chemotherapy after stenting is as effective and safe as chemotherapy after surgery. Stents may replace surgery in combination therapy with chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction.

The efficacy and safety of reduced-dose docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of advanced stage gastric adenocarcinoma

Patients with advanced gastric carcinoma have still had bad prognosis despite advances in the modern treatment era. Docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is effective, but highly toxic regimen for advanced cases. In this study, we modified the standard doses of DCF (mDCF) to evaluate the effectiveness and side effects. From July 2005 to July 2008, 37 advanced gastric cancer patients treated with at least one course of mDCF protocol as first-line treatment were included. The mDCF protocol included 60 mg/m(2) docetaxel and cisplatin for 1 day and 600 mg/m(2)/day, 5-flourouracil infusion for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks. No patients used prophylactic granulocte -colony stimulating factor. Of the patients, 28 were male and nine were female; the median age was 53 (23-65) years. Of them, 83.8% received at least four courses of chemotherapy and 64.9% completed the preplanned six courses of treatment. Eleven (29.7%) of those patients who received mDCF in the first-line treatment used the FOLFIRI (5-FU, folinic acit, irinotekan) regimen for the second-line treatment. Response rates were evaluated according to RECIST criteria in 30 out of 37 patients. The median follow-up time was 7.1 months. The longest follow-up time was 19.9 months. Two patients (5.4%) had complete response, nine (21.6%) had partial response, and 14 (37.9%) had stabilized disease; overall, the disease was controlled in 25 patients (64.9%) whereas five patients (13.5%) had progression. Median time to progression was 6.7 months and overall survival was 10 months. The assessment of patients for grade 3-4 toxicity revealed that while 5.4% had anemia and 8.1% had neutropenia, 5.4% nausea and 5.4% diarrhea. Neutropenic fever developed in two patients, requiring hospitalization. G-CSF was used in three patients. Two patients with neutropenic fever and two with severe anemia (total number 4; 10.8%) received delayed chemotherapy. Dose reduction was required in four patients (10.8%), one due to neutropenia, one due to nephrotoxicity, and two due to nausea. No patient died due to chemotherapy toxicity. This retrospective study suggested that mDCF might have comparable efficacy with classical DFC, with better toxicity profile. However, its small size and retrospective nature should be considered when interpreting the results.

Phase II study of weekly intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of weekly i.v. and i.p. paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 was carried out in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination and/or cancer cells on peritoneal cytology were enrolled. PTX was administered i.v. at 50 mg/m(2) and i.p. at 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. The primary end point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, efficacy against malignant ascites and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, including 21 with primary tumors with peritoneal dissemination, 13 with peritoneal recurrence and six with positive peritoneal cytology only. The median number of courses was 7 (range 1-23). The 1-year OS rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 65% to 90%). The overall response rate was 56% in 18 patients with target lesions. Malignant ascites disappeared or decreased in 13 of 21 (62%) patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (18%) and anemia (10%).

CONCLUSION

Combination chemotherapy of i.v. and i.p. PTX with S-1 is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Phase I/II and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 and oxaliplatin in previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 when given with oxaliplatin, to evaluate S-1 pharmacokinetics, and to determine the efficacy and safety of this regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Oxaliplatin was fixed at a dose of 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1). S-1 was administered from D1 to D14 of a 3-week cycle, and escalated by 10 mg/m2 per day from 70 mg/m2 per day up to 100 mg/m2 per day. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed following a single dose of S-1 on D-5 and D1 of the first cycle.

RESULTS

In phase I (n=18), MTD was not defined. In phase II (n=47) with the planned maximum dose, partial response was achieved in 26 patients (55.3%) and stable disease in 14 patients (29.8%). The median time to progression was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2 months) and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 9.2-15.9 months). Frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (39%), neutropenia (28%), anemia (17%), and leukopenia (13%). There was one grade 5 febrile neutropenia during the first cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of S-1 was not influenced by oxaliplatin. S-1/Oxaliplatin combination therapy is highly active against AGC and has a favorable toxicity profile.

S-1: a promising new oral fluoropyrimidine derivative

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is designed to improve the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concomitantly with an intent to reduce its toxicity. S-1 consists of tegafur, a prodrug of 5-FU combined with two 5-FU biochemical modulators:5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (gimeracil or CDHP), a competitive inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and oteracil potassium which inhibits phosphorylation of 5-FU in the gastrointestinal tract decreasing serious gastrointestinal toxicities,including nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and diarrhea. Being an oral agent, S-1 offers convenience of administration and prevents complications of central venous access such as infection, thrombosis and bleeding. S-1 has shown efficacy in both gastrointestinal as well non-gastrointestinal malignancies. The authors review the current literature and provide their expert opinion on the incorporation of S-1 in the treatment of solid malignancies [corrected].

New perspectives in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

Metastatic gastric cancer remains an incurable disease, with a relative 5-year survival rate of 7%-27%. Chemotherapy, which improves overall survival (OS) and quality of life, is the main treatment option. Meta-analysis has demonstrated that the best survival results obtained in earlier randomized studies were achieved with three-drug regimens containing a fluoropyrimidine, an anthracycline, and cisplatin (ECF). Although there has been little progress in improving median OS times beyond the 9-mo plateau achievable with the standard regimens, the availability of newer agents has provided some measure of optimism. A number of new combinations incorporating docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and S-1 have been explored in randomized trials. Some combinations, such as epirubicin-oxaliplatin-capecitabine, have been shown to be as effective as (or perhaps more effective than) ECF, and promising early data have been derived for S-1 in combination with cisplatin. One factor that might contribute to extending median OS is the advancement whenever possible to second-line cytotoxic treatments. However, the biggest hope for significant survival advances in the near future would be the combination of new targeted biological agents with existing chemotherapy first-line regimens.

Pharmacogenetics of fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin. A future application to gastric cancer treatment

Chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of gastric cancer both in adjuvant or advanced settings. Recent randomized trials in Japan have proved that S-1, a novel fluoropyrimidine derivative, and cisplatin are the most promising agents. However, both the efficacy and toxicity of a given regimen vary widely among patients due to the inherited variability of genes that involve drug anabolism and catabolism. A narrow therapeutic index of antitumor agents, i.e. a given regimen being too toxic and/or less effective to some segment of patients, prevents the overall improvement of treatment outcomes. Pharmacogenetics, a research field elucidating genetic polymorphism in drug metabolizing enzymes, may contribute to identifying patients who benefit from chemotherapy or who will experience life-threatening toxicity. There are several crucial enzymes identified involving anabolism and the catabolism of fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin, including dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidylate synthase, orotate phosphoribosyl transferase, glutathione S transferase, and excision repair cross complementary group. Various polymorphisms and ethnic variabilities of these genes have been elucidated. This review highlights variations within biological functions, detection systems, and possible clinical applications of these enzymatic polymorphisms. This knowledge provides a tool to determine an optimum regimen according to the patient's drug metabolizing characteristics. This stance will contribute to establishing individualized therapies for gastric cancer, which offers superior efficacy with a minimal chance of severe toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics in gastric cancer chemotherapy

Despite extensive efforts, treatment of gastric cancer by chemotherapy, the globally accepted standard, is yet undetermined, and uncertainty remains regarding the optimal regimen. Recent introduction of active "new generation agents" offers hope for improving patient outcomes. Current chemotherapeutic trials provided several regimens that may become a possible standard treatment, including docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (TCF) and cisplatin/S-1 for advanced and metastatic cancer and S-1 monotherapy in the adjuvant setting. Along with the development of novel active regimens, individual optimization of cancer chemotherapy has been attempted in order to reduce toxicity and enhance tumor response. Unlike the rare and limited contribution of pharmacokinetic studies, pharmacogenomic studies are increasing the potential to realize the therapeutics against gastric cancer. Despite the limited data, pharmacogenomics in gastric cancer have provided a number of putative biomarkers for the prediction of tumor response to chemotherapies and of toxicity.

A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly oxaliplatin in combination with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (modified FOLFOX regimen) in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Forty-six eligible patients older than 65 years with previously untreated AGC received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, together with leucovorin 400 mg/m over 2 h, followed by a 46-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil 2600 mg/m every 2 weeks. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. A median of seven cycles (range 1-12) was administered. The overall response rate was 45.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 31-61%] with two complete responses, 19 partial responses, 15 stable diseases, and 10 progressions. Median time to progression was 6.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-7.8) and median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI: 8.2-11.4). Toxicity was fairly mild. Grade 3 toxicities included neutropenia (8.7%), nausea (4.3%), vomiting (4.3%), diarrhea (2.2%); and grade 4 toxicities occurred in none of the patients. Grades 1-2 peripheral neuropathy was reported in 43.5% of patients. The modified FOLFOX regimen is active, well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients aged above 65 years with AGC.

Chemotherapy-induced transient CEA and CA19-9 surges in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Rising serum tumor markers after chemotherapy are generally considered to indicate tumor progression. However, we have observed a transient increase in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels despite clinical benefits from chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Therefore, this study was performed to determine the incidence of CEA and CA19-9 surges and their implications on the clinical outcome in MRGC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-one and 40 patients who had evaluable data for CEA or CA19-9 surges, respectively, were included. Both CEA and CA 19-9 surges were defined as a > 20% increase in these tumor markers from the baseline that was followed by a > 20% drop in subsequent levels compared to the baseline.

RESULTS

Of 51 evaluable patients for CEA surges, nine patients (18%) had documented CEA surges. The median time to CEA peak and the duration of the CEA surge were 2.8 (1.7 approximately 7.0) and 9.1 weeks (7.6 approximately 21.0), respectively. Of 40 evaluable patients for CA19-9 surges, seven patients (18%) had CA19-9 surges. The median time to peak and the duration of the CA19-9 surge were 2.3 (1.9 approximately 6.0) and 7.1 weeks (4.3 approximately 16.1), respectively. All patients with CEA or CA19-9 surges had radiographic evidence of benefits from chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

CEA or CA19-9 surges can be observed in MRGC patients receiving chemotherapy. All patients with these surge phenomena had clinical benefits from chemotherapy. An initial rise in CEA or CA19-9 levels after initiation of chemotherapy should not be used as an indicator of progressive disease.

Multidisciplinary approach to esophageal and gastric cancer

The incidence of esophageal and gastric malignancies has increased over the last decade. Historically, surgery has been considered the best treatment for these cancers. However, long-term survival after surgery is fair at best, because of the tendency of disease to recur locally and distantly. Presently, the management of these cancers involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. This article discusses various treatment strategies that employ these modalities either alone or in combination, in an attempt to improve survival rates for patients who have gastroesophageal malignancies.

A phase II study of radical surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 for gastric carcinoma with free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity (CCOG0301 study)

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastric cancer who have positive cytologic results for cancer cells in peritoneal washings (CY1) have poor outcomes, even in the absence of other distant metastases. A standard treatment for such patients remains to be established.

METHODS

We conducted a phase II trial with the 2-year survival rate as the primary endpoint. Patients who had gastric cancer with CY1 status but no other residual disease received postoperative chemotherapy with S-1 (1M tegafur-0.4M gimestat-1M otastat potassium) at a daily dose of 80mg/m(2) for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest. This cycle was continued until disease progression or intolerable adverse events. D2 dissection was the recommended surgical procedure; splenectomy could be omitted at the discretion of the surgeon. Accrual of 50 patients was planned, and a 2-year survival rate of more than 36% was needed to exceed the historical control.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled, among whom 47 were assessable for survival and 46 for adverse reactions. Median overall survival was 705 days, and progression-free survival was 376 days. The 2-year survival rate was 47%. Median time to treatment failure was 288 days. Neutropenia was the commonest > or = grade 3 toxicity (6 patients), and anorexia was the most frequent > or = grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity (10 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastrectomy followed by S-1 monotherapy resulted in survival that surpassed historical data and can serve as an active control treatment for future trials in patients who have gastric cancer with CY1 status in the Far East.

Activity of S-1 in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients after failure of prior chemotherapy, including irinotecan + cisplatin or fluorouracil (except S-1)

We retrospectively reviewed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of monotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients were evaluated. The median number of treatment cycles was 2 (range 1-19). There were no cases showing either complete or partial response, and 10 patients (47.6%) showed stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 89 days. Sixteen patients (76%) received third-line chemotherapy. The median survival time was 271 days after the initiation of S-1, with a 1-year survival rate of 32%. Hematological toxicities were Grade 4 anemia (9.5%), Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (9.5%) and leukopenia (4.7%). As for non-hematological toxicities, Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and anorexia were noted in 9.5% and 14.2% of the patients, respectively. S-1 was found to show no efficacy and cannot be recommended for second-line chemotherapy against gastric cancer.

A phase I study of palliative chemoradiation therapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin for local symptoms due to an unresectable primary advanced or locally recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of chemoradiation with paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (CDDP) for patients with local symptoms due to unresectable primary advanced or locally recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma located at left-upper abdomen.

METHODS

Chemotherapy consisted of PTX at escalating doses of 40-80 mg/m(2) per day and CDDP at escalating doses of 20-25 mg/m(2) per day on days 1, 15, and 29. Concurrent radiation was administered up to a dose of 45 Gy for 5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients were enrolled, of which six were into level 1 (PTX 60 mg/m(2) and CDDP 20 mg/m(2)) and three into level -1 (PTX 50 mg/m(2) and CDDP 20 mg/m(2)). At level 1, one patient developed grade 3 fatigue, and the other experienced grade 5 DIC, grade 5 pneumonia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 hyponatremia, and grade 3 esophagitis as dose-limiting toxicities. A palliative effect was observed in eight of nine patients; six of six patients at level 1 and two of three at level -1.

CONCLUSION

PTX 50 mg/m(2) and CDDP 20 mg/m(2) given biweekly with concurrent radiation therapy of 45 Gy were well tolerated.

Relation between outcomes and localisation of p-mTOR expression in gastric cancer

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a Ser/Thr protein kinase that mediates intracellular signalling related to cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation, has received considerable interest as a possible target for cancer treatment. We evaluated the correlation of mTOR expression with clinicopathological features, outcomes, and the expression of Akt, an upstream regulator of mTOR, in gastric cancer. Tumour samples were obtained from 109 patients with gastric adenocarcinomas who underwent a radical gastrectomy. The expressions of phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) and phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt) in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus were analysed by immunohistochemical staining. Cytoplasmic p-mTOR expression positively correlated with the depth of tumour invasion (T1 vs T2-4, P=0.003), involved lymph nodes (P=0.010), and tumour stage (I vs II-IV, P=0.002). In contrast, nuclear p-mTOR expression negatively correlated with these variables (P<0.001,=0.035, and <0.001). Cytoplasmic p-mTOR expression was associated with significantly poorer relapse-free survival (RFS, P=0.037) and overall survival (OS, P=0.024), whereas nuclear p-mTOR expression was associated with better RFS and OS (P=0.029, 0.059). Neither cytoplasmic nor nuclear p-Akt expression was associated with any clinicopathological factor or with survival. Localisation of p-mTOR may play an important role in tumour progression and outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.

High expression of HER3 is associated with a decreased survival in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 3 and HER4 has been elucidated in gastric cancer. HER1 and HER2 overexpression are regarded as prognostic factors and targets of treatment. The dimerization of the HER family receptors activates downstream signal pathways and promotes tumor progression. This study investigated the positive correlation between HER1 and HER4 expression and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor samples were obtained from gastric adenocarcinomas of 134 patients who underwent a gastrectomy from 1999 to 2002. The expression of each HER was analyzed in the tumor by immunohistochemical staining. Parametric correlations were done between HER expression and the clinicopathologic findings. A multivariate analysis was done with the overall survival.

RESULTS

HER3 expression was significantly associated with parameters involved with tumor progression, including the depth of tumor invasion (T1 versus T2-T4; P = 0.000), involved lymph nodes (P = 0.000), distant metastasis (P = 0.008), tumor stage (P = 0.000), and recurrent disease (P = 0.000). HER1 was also significantly associated with those factors excluding distant metastasis. A significant relationship was observed between the expression of HER1 and HER3 (P = 0.000). HER3 overexpression was associated with a significantly worse survival (P = 0.0000) and was an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 2.382; 95% confidence interval, 1.009-5.625; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

HER3 overexpression is strongly associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. It may become a new prognostic factor and a target of treatment.

Dose-finding study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 for patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and activity of combined docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy on metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered intravenously on day 1 and S-1 was administered orally on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle. The doses of docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 in the phase I study were level -1A, 52.5/80/60 mg/m(2); level -1B, 52.5/80/80 mg/m(2); level 1A, 52.5/105/80 mg/m(2); level 1B, 52.5/130/80 mg/m(2); level 2A, 60/105/80 mg/m(2); level 2B, 60/130/80 mg/m(2); level 3A, 67.5/105/80 mg/m(2); level 3B, 67.5/130/80 mg/m(2); level 4A, 75/105/80 mg/m(2); level 4B, 75/130/80 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled. One of six patients at level 1A and two of three patients at level 1B developed dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia) during the initial two cycles. Therefore, the doses used at levels 1B and 1A were defined as the MTD and RD, respectively. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. Six partial responses were noted, and the overall response rate was 67%.

CONCLUSION

The RD of the DOS regimen in patients with advanced gastric cancer was docetaxel 52.5 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 105 mg/m(2) on day 1 and S-1 80 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 of every 21-day cycle. A phase II study using the RD is currently underway.

Feasibility and accuracy of second-look laparoscopy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A better method for detecting early peritoneal progression is needed. This study evaluated the feasibility and accuracy of second-look laparoscopy for patients with gastric cancer treated using systemic chemotherapy after gastrectomy.

METHODS

Second-look laparoscopy was conducted for patients who had no clinical evidence of distant metastases but had peritoneal metastases or positive peritoneal cytology results without visible metastatic disease at initial surgery, patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy over a 6-month period after surgery, and patients who had no clinical evidence of disease based on imaging study after completion of primary chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between November 2004 and April 2008, 21 patients underwent second-look laparoscopy. At the initial surgery, 13 of these patients underwent total gastrectomy and 8 patients underwent distal gastrectomy. One or two sheets of adhesion barrier were received by 18 patients. The median interval between initial surgery and second-look laparoscopy was 9.8 months (range, 6.6-17.5 months). All second-look procedures were completed laparoscopically, and no patients required conversion to laparotomy. None of the 21 patients experienced postlaparoscopy complications. Whereas 12 patients showed no pathologic evidence of disease, 9 patients showed disease at second-look laparoscopy. There was a significant difference in median survival between the groups with negative and positive results (p = 0.017). The median survival for the negative group has not been determined. All the patients in the positive group received further chemotherapy while showing a good performance status (PS). Six patients were PS 0, and 3 patients were PS 1. The median survival time for this group was 10.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Second-look laparoscopy was a safe and promising approach to reassessment of peritoneal disease for patients with gastric cancer. The incidence of complications was low, particularly in this group of patients, all of whom had undergone prior gastrectomy.

Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine or S-1) and cisplatin as first line treatment in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin therapy in elderly patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer (AGC) retrospectively. In addition, we evaluated the relative activity and toxicity of these agents in this patient population.

METHODS

Clinical data from 72 patients with previously untreated AGC, who were treated with capecitabine/cisplatin and S-1/cisplatin, were reviewed. Oral fluoropyrimidines were administered orally twice a day on Days 1-14. The dose of capecitabine was 1250 mg/m(2) and that of S-1 was 50 mg [body surface area (BSA) < 1.5 m(3)] or 60 mg (BSA > 1.5 m(3)) twice a day. Cisplatin was administered intravenously on Day 1 (before the first dose of capecitabine or S-1) at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) over a 2 h period. The chemotherapy cycle was of 3 weeks (with oral capecitabine or S-1).

RESULTS

Thirty-two and 40 patients received the S-1 and capecitabine regimens, respectively, and were included in the analysis. The S-1 protocol had a response rate of 40.6%, a median time-to-progression (TTP) of 5.4 months and a median survival of 9.6 months. The capecitabine had a response rate of 55%, a median TTP of 5.9 months and a median survival of 10.2 months. Each protocol had a similar incidence of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. However, there was a higher rate of the hand-foot syndrome (6 versus 37%) and diarrhea (25 versus 32%) in the capecitabine group.

CONCLUSION

Oral fluoropyrimidines and cisplatin in elderly patients with untreated AGC showed encouraging results. The treatment was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. The comparison of S-1 with capecitabine showed that capecitabine had a slightly higher response rate (statistically not significant) in addition to a higher rate of adverse events such as the hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea. These data should be warranted with further prospective studies.

Severe adverse effects of 5-fluorouracil in S-1 were lessened by haemodialysis due to elimination of the drug

S-1 and cisplatin are used as one of the first-line chemotherapies for gastric cancer in Japan. The plasma concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is increased in patients with renal dysfunction because gimeracil in S-1 inhibits the degradation of 5-FU and about 50% of gimeracil is excreted in the urine. We describe a 35-year-old man with acute kidney injury while taking S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer and who presented severe adverse effects of 5-FU. This case report describes the evolution of the plasma concentrations of 5-FU with haemodialysis along with a decrease in the adverse drug effects.

Chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer in Japan

Until the 1990s, there were no chemotherapy regimens with old-generation anticancer agents showing a survival benefit over 5-fluorouracil (FU) alone, and standard chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer had not been established. In the late 1990s, several new active agents were developed and some phase III trials with these agents were conducted; the new agent S-1 showed noninferiority to 5-FU in these trials. S-1 plus cisplatin is the first doublet chemotherapy to have shown a survival benefit over monotherapy with S-1. It has been demonstrated that capecitabine and oxaliplatin (OHP) can replace 5-FU and cisplatin (CDDP), offering more convenient treatment options. Thus, combination chemotherapy with an oral fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine) and platinum (CDDP or OHP) has been recognized as standard chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer all over the world. However, it can be said that none of these new combination chemotherapies have shown remarkable progress from 5-FU plus cisplatin regimens. It is expected that triplet chemotherapy with a taxane; the use of molecular targeting agents; and the establishment of treatment strategies including second line chemotherapy, will lead to remarkable progress in personalized medicine in the near future.

Antitumor effect of SN-38-releasing polymeric micelles, NK012, on spontaneous peritoneal metastases from orthotopic gastric cancer in mice compared with irinotecan

7-Ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38), an active metabolite of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11), has potent antitumor activity. Moreover, we have reported the strong antitumor activity of NK012 (i.e., SN-38-releasing polymeric micelles) against human cancer xenografts compared with CPT-11. Here, we investigated the advantages of NK012 over CPT-11 treatment in mouse models of gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. NK012 or CPT-11 was i.v. administered thrice every 4 days at their respective maximum tolerable doses (NK012, 30 mg/kg/day; CPT-11, 67 mg/kg/day) to mice receiving orthotopic transplants of gastric cancer cell lines (44As3Luc and 58As1mLuc) transfected with the luciferase gene (n = 5). Antitumor effect was evaluated using the photon counting technique. SN-38 concentration in gastric tumors and peritoneal nodules was examined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) 1, 24, and 72 hours after each drug injection. NK012 or CPT-11 distribution in these tumors was evaluated using a fluorescence microscope on the same schedule. In both models, the antitumor activity of NK012 was superior to that of CPT-11. High concentrations of SN-38 released from NK012 were detected in gastric tumors and peritoneal nodules up to 72 hours by HPLC. Only a slight conversion from CPT-11 to SN-38 was observed from 1 to 24 hours. Fluorescence originating from NK012 was detected up to 72 hours, whereas that from CPT-11 disappeared until 24 hours. NK012 also showed antitumor activity against peritoneal nodules. Thus, NK012 showing enhanced distribution with prolonged SN-38 release may be ideal for cancer treatment because the antitumor activity of SN-38 is time dependent.

Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas

Dushinsky et al. left a great gift to human beings with the discovery of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Approximately 50 years have elapsed from that discovery to the development of S-1 (TS-1^®). The concept of developing an anticancer agent that simultaneously possesses both efficacy-enhancing and adverse reaction-reducing effects could be achieved only with a three-component combination drug. S-1 is an oral anticancer agent containing two biochemical modulators for 5-FU and tegafur (FT), a metabolically activated prodrug of 5-FU. The first modulator, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), enhances the pharmacological actions of 5-FU by potently inhibiting its degradation. The second modulator, potassium oxonate (Oxo), localizing in mucosal cells of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract after oral administration, reduces the incidence of GI toxicities by suppressing the activation of 5-FU in the GI tract. Thus, S-1 combines FT, CDHP and Oxo at a molar ratio of 1:0.4:1. In 1999–2007, S-1 was approved for the treatment of the following seven cancers: gastric, head and neck, colorectal, non-small cell lung, breast, pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. ‘S-1 and low-dose cisplatin therapy’ without provoking Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities was proposed to enhance its clinical usefulness. Furthermore, ‘alternate-day S-1 regimen’ may improve the dosing schedule for 5-FU by utilizing its strongly time-dependent mode of action; the former is characterized by the low incidences of myelotoxicity and non-hematologic toxicities (e.g. ≤Grade 1 anorexia, fatigue, stomatitis, nausea, vomiting and taste alteration). These two approaches are considered to allow long-lasting therapy with S-1.

Irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy and S-1 plus cisplatin therapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer in a single institution

BACKGROUND

From the results of the JCOG9912 and SPIRITS trials, S-1 plus cisplatin (CDDP) therapy (SP) has been recognized as the standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan. However, in their subsets of patients with the target lesion, irinotecan (CPT-11) plus CDDP therapy (IP) resulted in longer survival than 5-fluorouracil alone while SP exhibited a survival similar to S-1 alone. The objective of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of these two regimens.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were treated with IP and 32 with SP between September 2002 and July 2006 at Shizuoka Cancer Center. In IP, 70 mg/m(2) CPT-11 was administered on Days 1 and 15, 80 mg/m(2) CDDP on Day 1, repeated every 4 weeks. In SP, 40-60 mg S-1 depending on the patient's body surface area was given orally twice daily for 21 days and 60 mg/m(2) CDDP intravenously on Day 8, repeated every 5 weeks.

RESULTS

The response rate, progression-free survival and median survival were 47% (17 of 36), 170 and 444 days in IP, and 80% (21 of 26), 235 and 469 days in SP. In patients with target lesions, those were 47%, 170 and 431 days in IP, and 80%, 235 and 442 days in SP. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was similar in both groups, but patient refusal of treatment was more frequent for IP than for SP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a better efficacy and feasibility of SP than IP for advanced gastric cancer patients, with or without a target lesion.