W4‐17: A diverse and high‐confidence dataset of atomization energies for benchmarking high‐level electronic structure methods

Deciphering the exceptional selectivity of semipinacol rearrangements in cis-fused β-lactam diols using high-level quantum chemical methods

The semipinacol rearrangement mechanism in cis-fused β-lactam diols has been found to kinetically and thermodynamically favor acyl migration. The semipinacol rearrangement was also investigated for trans-fused β-lactam diol, in which the reversed selectivity that favors the alkyl migration was observed.

Thermochemistry of Guanine Tautomers Re-Examined by Means of High-Level CCSD(T) Composite Ab Initio Methods

We obtained accurate gas-phase tautomerization energies for a set of 14 guanine tautomers by means of high-level thermochemical procedures approximating the CCSD(T) energy at the complete basis set (CBS) limit. For the five low-lying tautomers, we use the computationally demanding W1-F12 composite method for obtaining the tautomerization energies. The relative W1-F12 tautomerization enthalpies at 298K are: 0.00 (1), 2.37 (2), 2.63 (3), 4.03 (3′), and 14.31 (4) kJmol−1. Thus, as many as four tautomers are found within a small energy window of less than 1.0kcalmol−1 (1kcalmol−1=4.184kJmol−1). We use these highly accurate W1-F12 tautomerization energies to evaluate the performance of a wide range of lower-level composite ab initio procedures. The Gn composite procedures (G4, G4(MP2), G4(MP2)-6X, G3, G3B3, G3(MP2), and G3(MP2)B3) predict that the enol tautomer (3) is more stable than the keto tautomer (2) by amounts ranging from 0.36 (G4) to 1.28 (G3(MP2)) kJmol−1. We also find that an approximated CCSD(T)/CBS energy calculated as HF/jul-cc-pV{D,T}Z+CCSD/jul-cc-pVTZ+(T)/jul-cc-pVDZ results in a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of merely 0.11kJmol−1 relative to the W1-F12 reference values. We use this approximated CCSD(T)/CBS method to obtain the tautomerization energies of 14 guanine tautomers. The relative tautomerization enthalpies at 298K are: 0.00 (1), 2.20 (2), 2.51 (3), 4.06 (3′), 14.30 (4), 25.65 (5), 43.78 (4′), 53.50 (6′), 61.58 (6), 77.37 (7), 82.52 (8′), 86.02 (9), 100.70 (10), and 121.01 (8) kJmol−1. Using these tautomerization enthalpies, we evaluate the performance of standard and composite methods for the entire set of 14 guanine tautomers. The best-performing procedures emerge as (RMSDs are given in parentheses): G4(MP2)-6X (0.51), CCSD(T)+ΔMP2/CBS (0.52), and G4(MP2) (0.64kJmol−1). The worst performers are CCSD(T)/AVDZ (1.05), CBS-QB3 (1.24), and CBS-APNO (1.38kJmol−1).

Extrapolation of high-order correlation energies: the WMS model

We have developed a new composite model chemistry method called WMS (Wuhan-Minnesota scaling method) with three characteristics: (1) a composite scheme to approximate the complete configuration interaction valence energy with the affordability condition of requiring no calculation more expensive than CCSD(T)/jul-cc-pV(T+d)Z, (2) low-cost methods for the inner-shell correlation contribution and scalar relativistic correction, and (3) accuracy comparable to methods with post-CCSD(T) components. The new method is shown to be accurate for the W4-17 database of 200 atomization energies with an average mean unsigned error (averaged with equal weight over strongly correlated and weakly correlated subsets of the data) of 0.45 kcal mol-1, and the performance/cost ratio of these results compares very favorably to previously available methods. We also assess the WMS method against the DBH24-W4 database of diverse barrier heights and the energetics of the reactions of three strongly correlated Criegee intermediates with water. These results demonstrate that higher-order correlation contributions necessary to obtain high accuracy for molecular thermochemistry may be successfully extrapolated from the lower-order components of CCSD(T) calculations, and chemical accuracy can now be obtained for larger and more complex molecules and reactions.

Do CCSD and approximate CCSD-F12 variants converge to the same basis set limits? The case of atomization energies

While the title question is a clear "yes" from purely theoretical arguments, the case is less clear for practical calculations with finite (one-particle) basis sets. To shed further light on this issue, the convergence to the basis set limit of CCSD (coupled cluster theory with all single and double excitations) and of different approximate implementations of CCSD-F12 (explicitly correlated CCSD) has been investigated in detail for the W4-17 thermochemical benchmark. Near the CBS ([1-particle] complete basis set) limit, CCSD and CCSD(F12^*) agree to within their respective uncertainties (about ±0.04 kcal/mol) due to residual basis set incompleteness error, but a nontrivial difference remains between CCSD-F12b and CCSD(F12^*), which is roughly proportional to the degree of static correlation. The observed basis set convergence behavior results from the superposition of a rapidly converging, attractive, CCSD[F12]-CCSD-F12b difference (consisting mostly of third-order terms) and a more slowly converging, repulsive, fourth-order difference between CCSD(F12^*) and CCSD[F12]. For accurate thermochemistry, we recommend CCSD(F12^*) over CCSD-F12b if at all possible. There are some indications that the nZaPa family of basis sets exhibits somewhat smoother convergence than the correlation consistent family.