Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer

Posterior versus standard approach in pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-match study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Posterior approach pancreatoduodenectomy (paPD) technique is one of the many modifications of the standard Whipple procedure (sPD). The most important modification of the technique is first approach of the superior mesenteric artery, thus enabling a complete dissection of the right side of this artery and of the portal vein, as well as a complete excision of the retroportal pancreatic lamina. The present study is a case-match one, comparing the paPD to sPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study includes two groups of patients. A first group of 21 patients with PD by posterior approach (group 1, reference group, paPD) and a second group including 21 matched patients with PD by standard approach (group 2, control group, sPD). Demographic characteristics (sex, age), intraoperative data (approach type, operative time, blood loss, intraoperative complications, need for vascular resections and type of reconstruction, type of resection upon remnant tissue), histological diagnosis and pathology data (tumor location, TNM staging, tumor grading, tumor vascular invasion), patient outcomes (postoperative length of stay, in-hospital postoperative mortality and morbidity, survival time) were analyzed in both groups of patients and compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the two groups regarding early morbidity and mortality rates, length of hospitalization, overall survival, and survival according to tumor type. However, it was noticed that there was a significant lesser mean blood loss in the pa PD group vs SPD group (P = 0.0314) and a shorter operative time in the paPD group vs sPD group (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

The paPD offers an early selection of patients during the operation (in terms of local resectability, by assessing the SMA infiltration), allows an optimal exposure of arterial abnormalities (a replaced right hepatic artery from the SMA), and better detection of venous invasion. In cases with PV/SMV invasion, paPD is particularly useful allowing a "no-touch" resection with no intraportal tumor dissemination and facilitates the vascular reconstruction. In addition, the operative bleeding and time are lower in the paPD group, probably due to early ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery and reduced congestion of the pancreatic head.

Intraarterial ultrasound in pancreatic cancer: feasibility study and preliminary results

Despite technological advances in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, the involvement of the celiac or mesenteric artery in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain in many cases. Infiltration of these vessels is important in making decisions about therapy choices but often can only be definitively determined through laparotomy. Local (intraarterial) ultrasound may increase diagnostic accuracy. Using the Volcano intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) system, we applied a transfemoral method to scan the celiac and mesenteric arteries directly intraarterial. This technique was used in five patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. Technical success was achieved in all cases. In one case, a short dissection of the mesenteric artery occurred but could be managed interventionally. In tumors that did not contact with the vessels, IVUS was unable to display the tissue pathology. Our main interest was the infiltration of the arteries. In one case, infiltration was certain in the CT scan but uncertain in two patients. In the latter two cases, IVUS correctly predicted infiltration in one and freedom from tumor in the other case. In our preliminary study, IVUS correctly predicted arterial infiltration in all cases. IVUS did not provide new information when the tumor was far away from the vessel. Compared with IVUS in the portal vein, the information about the artery is more detailed, and the vessel approach is easier. These results encouraged us to design a prospective study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this method.

Resection of Portovenous Structures to Obtain Microscopically Negative Margins during Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma is Worthwhile

Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma may require resections of the portal vein and/or its major tributaries to achieve tumor extirpation, albeit with the potential for increased morbidity and mortality. However, major venous resections can impart complete tumor extirpation and thereby a survival advantage compared with resections with residual microscopic disease. This study was undertaken to determine if resection of the portal vein and/or its splenic or superior mesenteric venous (SMV) tributaries is a worthwhile endeavor. Since 1995, patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma have been prospectively followed. The impact of portovenous resections (portal vein, SMV, and/or splenic vein) on survival was evaluated using survival curve analysis (Mantel-Cox test). Margins were codified as R0 or R1 and data are presented as median, mean ± SD where appropriate. For 220 patients undergoing PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, survival was 17 months. Patients undergoing RO resections had improved survival relative to patients undergoing R1 resections (20 vs 13 months, P < 0.03). Concomitant portovenous resections were undertaken in 48 patients. There was no difference in survival after PD without portovenous resection (17 months) versus PD with portovenous resection (18 months). Resections with complete tumor extirpation (i.e., RO resections) provide superior long-term survival; all efforts to obtain RO resections should be undertaken. Portovenous resections during pancreaticoduodenectomy can be undertaken safely and are worthwhile when complete tumor extirpation is attainable.

Prognostic factors for survival after extended pancreatectomy for pancreatic head cancer: influence of resection margin status on survival

OBJECTIVES

Although a positive resection margin has been reported to be a strong prognostic factor after resection for pancreatic cancer, several studies indicated that resection status did not independently affect survival. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of resection margin status on survival after extended radical resection for pancreatic head cancer.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-eight cases of pancreatoduodenectomy and 38 cases of pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The resection margins were negative (R0) in 115 patients (65.3%), microscopically positive (R1) in 38 patients (21.6%), and grossly positive (R2) in 23 patients (13.1%). Patients with R1 resection survived significantly shorter (median survival time [MST], 9.4 months) than R0 resection patients (MST, 15.2 months) but survived longer than R2 resection patients (MST, 6.2 months). By multivariate analysis, R2 resection, together with lymph node metastasis, portal venous system, and extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasions, independently affected the overall survival, but R1 resection was not significantly influential.

CONCLUSIONS

R2 resection was an independent predictor of poor prognosis after pancreatoduodenectomy/pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy, whereas R1 resection did not independently affect the survival.

Advances in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: limitations of surgery and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma is one of the most dismal malignancies of the gastrointestinal system. Even after curative resection, the actual 5-year survival is only 10%-20%. Of all the treatments used against pancreatic cancer, surgery is still the only one that can achieve complete cure. Pancreatic cancer spreads easily to the adjacent tissues and distant metastasis is common. Typically, this cancer invades the retropancreatic neural tissue, duodenum, portal vein (PV), and superior mesenteric vein (SMV), or regional lymph nodes. For this reason, aggressive surgery that removes the cancerous lesion completely is recommended. Several retrospective and prospective studies have been conducted to validate the usefulness of aggressive surgery for pancreatic cancer in the past few decades. Surprisingly, the survival benefits of aggressive surgery have been denied by most randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This implies that surgery alone is not enough. Thus, adjuvant therapy, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has been given in combination with surgery to improve survival. Although the benefits of radiotherapy alone are limited, the results of chemotherapy are promising. Other newly evolving molecular targeting drugs may also improve the treatment outcomes of pancreatic cancer.

Does portal-superior mesenteric vein invasion still indicate irresectability for pancreatic carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic carcinoma frequently infiltrates the portal vein or the superior mesenteric vein; pancreatectomy combined with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection represents a potentially curative treatment in these cases but is still a controversial procedure.

METHODS

After performing a computerized Medline search, 12 series published during the last 8 years were selected, enrolling 399 patients who underwent pancreatectomy combined with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma. Data were examined for information about indications, operation, adjuvant therapies, histopathology of resected specimens, perioperative results, and survival. Also, previous literature regarding the issue was extensively reviewed.

RESULTS

Operative mortality and postoperative complication rates ranged from 0 to 7.7% and 16.7% to 54%, respectively. Median survival varied from 13 to 22 months; 5-year survival rate ranged from 9% to 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature suggests that portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection combined with pancreatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure that increases the number of patients who undergo curative resection and, therefore, provides important survival benefits to selected groups of patients. This procedure should always be considered in case of suspected tumor infiltration of portal/superior mesenteric vein to achieve clear resection margins, in the absence of other contraindications for resection.

Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients.

Portal or superior mesenteric vein resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of the length of venous resection

BACKGROUND

We investigated retrospectively the operative outcomes of portal vein resection (PVR) for portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) involvement and clarified the validity of PVR.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2006, 84 patients with invasive pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were resected by pancreatoduodenectomy with macroscopically curative resection. Forty-two patients underwent PVR by means of segmental resection with end-to-end anastomosis in 27 patients and autologous vein graft using an external iliac vein in 15 patients because of macroscopic venous involvement. Venous involvement was classified macroscopically as unilateral involvement (< or =180 degrees ; n = 27) or circumferential involvement (n = 15) and as short (the length of PVR < 3 cm; n = 15) or long (> or =3 cm; n = 27). Histopathologic parameters and survival were analyzed to confirm prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Morbidity and mortality were not different based on PVR status. Median and 5-year survivals were 26 months and 32%, respectively, when there was no PVR (n = 42) and 12 months and 17% when there was PVR (n = 42); these values of median and 5-year survivals differed (P < .04 each) between the groups without and with PVR. Limiting the analysis to R0 (histologically curative) resections, median and 5-year survivals were 26 months and 34% when there was no PVR (n = 39) and 20 months and 23% when there was PVR (n = 32); these survivals were not significantly different between groups. In patients with PVR, there were no statistical differences in survival between those resected with or without a venous allograft and those with unilateral or circumferential involvement; however, short PVR showed better 5-year survival than long PVR (39% vs 4%; P = .017) despite similar positive rates of histologic venous invasion.

CONCLUSION

PVR has comparable survival compared with no PVR only in patients undergoing an R0 resection. The short PV/SMV invasion that requires PVR <3 cm in length can result in respectable survival rates.

Pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastasis: a contraindication for radical surgery?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the operative indications for pancreatic cancer with paraaortic lymph node metastases (No. 16 [+]).

METHODS

Between July 1981 and March 2007, 335 patients with pancreatic cancer including 45 No. 16 (+) patients underwent extended radical surgery at the Department of Surgery II, Nagoya University. The overall survival rates and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Although there was no significant difference in survival between the No. 16 (+) patients and the unresectable cases, there were some long-term survivors among the No. 16 (+) patients. Multivariate analysis of the No. 16 (+) patients identified age (59 years or younger), tumor size (>4 cm), and pathologically confirmed portal invasion (pPV[+]) as independent prognostic factors. The survival of No. 16 (+) patients without these factors was significantly better than the unresectable cases. The survival of patients with only 1 metastatic paraaortic lymph node also was significantly better than the unresectable cases, and tended to be better than those with more than 2 metastatic nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

No. 16 (+) pancreatic cancer patients with age 60 years or older, tumor size 4 cm or less, and pPV(-) may benefit from resection.

Is pancreatectomy with arterial reconstruction a safe and useful procedure for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

We often encounter unresectable pancreatic cancer due to invasions of the major vessels. Vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancers has an advantage in en block local resection. There are potential cases in which good outcomes can be achieved by arterial resection.

METHODS

Pancreatectomy (including total pancreatectomy in 15 cases, pancreatoduodenectomy in 7 cases and distal pancreatectomy in one case) was performed in 23 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, in combination with resection and reconstruction of the hepatic artery in 15 cases, the superior mesenteric artery in 12 cases (there are overlaps) and the portal vein in 20 cases.

RESULTS

The median operating time was 686 min (416-1,190 min) and the median blood loss was 2,830 ml (440-19,800 ml). This shows that the surgery was highly-invasive. The operative mortality rate was 4.3%. On the basis of the UICC classification, there were 2 cases of Stage IIa, 4 cases of Stage IIb, 9 cases of Stage III, 8 cases of Stage IV, while there were 18 cases (78.3%) of R0 resection. On the other hand, the final histological findings showed that there were 8 cases (34.8%) of M1 (liver and non-regional lymph node metastases), so it is thought that decisions on operative indications should be not be made slightly. As for the overall survival rate, the 1-year survival rate was 51.2% and the 3-year survival rate was 23.1% while the median survival time (MST) was 12 months. As for 15 cases of M0, the 1-year survival rate was 61.9% and the 4-year survival rate was 38.7% while the MST was 16 months. On the other hand, the MST was poor (10 months) in 8 cases of M1, showing that a statistically significant difference was observed depending upon the degree of metastasis (log-rank P = 0.0409). In 18 cases of R0, the 1-year survival rate was 67.2%, the 4-year survival rate 30.2% and the MST 13 months, respectively, while in 5 cases of R1 and R2, the MST was 6 months, showing that there was a statistically significant difference between R0 cases and R1, R2 cases (log-rank P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Further discussion is required concerning surgical indications and significance. However, it is thought that resection is useful only when surgery of R0 has taken place for selected locally advanced pancreatic cancer (M0).

Surgical resection versus palliative chemoradiotherapy for the management of pancreatic cancer with local venous invasion: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Benefit from pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) combined with superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMV-PV) resection in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with local venous invasion remains controversial.

METHODS

Using formal decision analysis, we compared survival associated with PD plus SMV-PV resection when applied to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with isolated local venous invasion (Group 1) versus that achieved with palliative chemoradiotherapy when applied to patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (Group 2). Individual studies were identified using Medline. A total of 1,324 and 709 patients were analyzed for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients with distant metastases were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall decision analysis favored surgical resection (Group 1) over palliative chemoradiotherapy (Group 2). Sensitivity analyses indicated that this decision is sensitive to the perioperative mortality rate and the percentage of surgical resections with microscopic (R1) or macroscopic (R2) residual tumor at the resection margin. In contrast, sensitivity analysis revealed that the decision is not sensitive to the percentage of cases in which true venous invasion by cancer is documented histologically.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection may confer a survival advantage over palliative chemoradiotherapy in select patients with pancreatic cancers with presumed local venous invasion.

[Not Available]

A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggesting that initial resection was insufficient; 3) some retrospective studies suggest that extension of lymphadenectomy improves post-resection survival. Extended lymphadenectomy, including circumferential dissection of both the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery and resection of para-aortic nodes, was evaluated by 4 randomized trials; globally there was no survival benefit. Extended lymphadenectomy increases, at least transiently, the risk of post-operative diarrhea. Its influence on the rate of loco-regional recurrences has not been evaluated. However, this technique should not be definitively and globally precluded since a more radical resection was associated with a trend toward better long-term survival in the trial with the largest number of patients.

[Not Available]

A. Sauvanet Several factors argue for extended lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 1) lymph node extension is an adverse prognostic factor; 2) some tumor recurrences are only loco-regional suggesting that initial resection was insufficient; 3) some retrospective studies suggest that extension of lymphadenectomy improves post-resection survival. Extended lymphadenectomy, including circumferential dissection of both the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery and resection of para-aortic nodes, was evaluated by 4 randomized trials; globally there was no survival benefit. Extended lymphadenectomy increases, at least transiently, the risk of post-operative diarrhea. Its influence on the rate of loco-regional recurrences has not been evaluated. However, this technique should not be definitively and globally precluded since a more radical resection was associated with a trend toward better long-term survival in the trial with the largest number of patients.

Therapeutic anticoagulant does not modify thromboses rate vein after venous reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy

Recommendations for anticoagulation following major venous reconstruction for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) are not clearly established. The aim of our study was to find out the relation between postoperative anticoagulant treatment and thrombosis rate after portal venous resection. Materials and methods. Between 1986 and 2006, twenty seven portal vein resections were performed associated with pancreaticoduodenectomies (n = 27) (PD).We defined four types of venous resection: type I was performed 1 cm above the confluent of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) (n = 12); type II lateral resection and venorrhaphy at the level of the confluent SMV (n = 12); type III (n = 1) resulted from a primary end-to-end anastomosis above confluent and PTFE graph was used for reconstruction for type IV (n = 2). Curative anticoagulant treatment was always indicated after type IV (n = 2) resection, and after resection of type II when the length of venous resection was longer than ≥2 cm. Results. Venous thrombosis rate reached: 0%, 41%, and 100% for type I, II, IV resections, respectively. Among them four patients received curative anticoagulant treatment. Conclusion. After a portal vein resection was achieved in the course of a PD, curative postoperative anticoagulation does not prevent efficiently the onset of thrombosis.

Surgical strategies for treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery?

Tumor related pancreatic surgery has progressed significantly during recent years. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with lymphadenectomy, including vascular resection, still presents the optimal surgical procedure for carcinomas in the head of pancreas. For patients with small or low-grade malignant neoplasms, as well as small pancreatic metastases located in the mid-portion of pancreas, central pancreatectomy (CP) is emerging as a safe and effective option with a low risk of developing de-novo exocrine and/or endocrine insufficiency. Total pancreatectomy (TP) is not as risky as it was years ago and can nowadays safely be performed, but its indication is limited to locally extended tumors that cannot be removed by PD or distal pancreatectomy (DP) with tumor free surgical margins. Consequently, TP has not been adopted as a routine procedure by most surgeons. On the other hand, an aggressive attitude is required in case of advanced distal pancreatic tumors, provided that safe and experienced surgery is available. Due to the development of modern instruments, laparoscopic operations became more and more successful, even in malignant pancreatic diseases. This review summarizes the recent literature on the above mentioned topics.

Improving outcomes for operable pancreatic cancer: is access to safer surgery the problem?

Despite advances in the understanding and treatment of pancreatic cancer in the last two decades, there is a persisting nihilistic attitude among clinicians. An alarmingly high rate of under-utilization of surgical management for operable pancreatic cancer was recently reported in the USA, where more than half of patients with stage 1 operable disease and no other contraindications were not offered surgery as therapy, denying this group of patients a 20% chance of long-term survival. These data indicate that a nihilistic attitude among clinicians may be a significant and reversible cause of the persisting high mortality of patients with pancreatic cancer. This article examines the modern management of pancreatic cancer, in particular, the advances in surgical care that have reduced the mortality of pancreatectomy to almost that of colonic resection, and outlines a strategy for improving outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer now and in the future.

Results of a pancreatectomy with a limited venous resection for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The indications for a pancreatectomy with a partial resection of the portal or superior mesenteric vein for pancreatic cancer, when the vein is involved by the tumor, remain controversial. It can be assumed that when such involvement is not extensive, resection of the tumor and the involved venous segment, followed by venous reconstruction will extend the potential benefits of this resection to a larger number of patients. The further hypothesis of this study is that whenever involvement of the vein by the tumor does not exceed 2 cm in length, this involvement is more likely due to the location of the tumor being close to the vein rather than because of its aggressive biological behavior. Consequently, in these instances a pancreatectomy with a resection of the involved segment of portal or superior mesenteric vein for pancreatic cancer is indicated, as it will yield results that are superposable to those of a pancreatectomy for cancer without vascular involvement.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with carcinoma of the pancreas involving the portal or superior mesenteric vein over a length of 2 cm or less underwent a macroscopically curative resection of the pancreas en bloc with the involved segment of the vein. The venous reconstruction procedures included a tangential resection/lateral suture in 15 cases, a resection/end-to-end anastomosis in 11, and a resection/patch closure in 3.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 3.4%; morbidity was 21%. Local recurrence was 14%. Cumulative (standard error) survival rate was 17% (9%) at 3 years.

CONCLUSION

A pancreatectomy combined with a resection of the portal or superior mesenteric vein for cancer with venous involvement not exceeding 2 cm is indicated in order to extend the potential benefits of a curative resection.

Surgical management of carcinoma of the head of pancreas: extended lymphadenectomy or modified en bloc resection?

Pancreatoduodenectomy for the treatment of periampullary cancer was described over 70 years ago. The technique has evolved in an attempt to improve the dismal prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancers. Radical regional resection has been proposed to decrease the incidence of local recurrence as well as to improve survival. These extended resections have failed to show a significant survival benefit in prospective randomized controlled studies. Furthermore, extended pancreatic resections may be associated with increased morbidity. The concept of modified en bloc resection has been advocated and is soundly based on anatomical and pathological principals. This procedure is a modification of the radical regional resection previously described. It involves resection of the peripancreatic retroperitoneal tissue and lymph nodes en bloc with the head of pancreas, in order to achieve an R0 resection but without the morbidity associated with an extended lymphadenectomy. Conceptually, this procedure may be the most appropriate technique for the management of pancreatic head cancers although the ultimate effect on long-term survival can only be judged after further clinical studies.

Survival after pancreatectomy with major arterial resection and reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Absence of major arterial tumor involvement has generally been regarded as a major criterion for resectability of pancreatic tumors. We hypothesize that resection of a tumor-involved hepatic artery (HA) or celiac artery (CA) with reconstruction may offer a survival benefit to patients whose tumors were traditionally regarded as unresectable.

METHODS

All patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated between 1996 and 2007 were reviewed. Patients were included if they underwent resection of the HA or CA during pancreatectomy. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survivor functions, Cox proportional hazard models, and the log rank test.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (six men and six women) with adenocarcinoma underwent pancreatectomy with resection of a tumor-involved HA (n = 2) and/or CA (n = 10). Median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range, 53-73 years). All patients completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without full dose chemotherapy before resection. Procedures performed were six extended pancreaticoduodenectomies, two proximal subtotal pancreatectomies, two distal pancreatectomies, and two total pancreatectomies. Ten cases involved celiac resections, and two had isolated HA resections. The 60-day mortality was 17% (2 of 12). Median survival after diagnosis was 20 months (range, 6-41 months). Median survival after resection was 17 months (range, 1-36 months). Survival was not statistically significantly related to age, sex, margin status, or preoperative CA19-9 level. The 3-year survival was 17%. There were no 5-year survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of the HA or CA with reconstruction may prolong survival for selected patients who undergo pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy. However, this aggressive approach did not result in any long-term survivors in our series.

Surgery insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. The number of new cases diagnosed and the number of deaths each year are almost identical, demonstrating the particularly dismal prognosis for patients affected by this disease. Despite recent advances in the field of medical and radiation oncology, and the introduction of neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens, surgery remains the single most important modality for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery for pancreatic cancer is widely viewed as a complex procedure associated with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Many aspects of surgery for pancreatic cancer, such as the extent of resection, the value of vascular resection, the use of laparoscopy, and the importance of treatment at high-volume centers, are currently under debate. This Review describes the current status of surgical treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and highlights the new developments in this field.

Extended Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas presents a number of therapeutic challenges. Given the poor long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), many surgeons have sought to improve survival via a radical or "extended" pancreatectomy which may include (a) total pancreatectomy (TP), (b) extended lymph node dissection (ELND), and (c) portal/mesenteric vascular resections. These themes of "extended" resection are addressed in this review. TP should not be performed for most cases of adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head because of the nominal incidence of lymph node involvement along the body and tail of the pancreas, the scarcity of multicentric disease, and the better management of pancreatic leaks after PD. Most studies show no difference in long-term survival and demonstrate greater postoperative morbidity after TP than after PD. Performing ELND in addition to PD is not worthwhile because most studies do not demonstrate any long-term benefits from ELND and the circumferential dissection around the mesenteric vessels required to harvest distant lymph nodes increases postoperative morbidity. Major arterial resection increases postoperative morbidity after PD and worsens long-term survival as the need for arterial resection to achieve negative resection margins indicates more aggressive disease. In contrast, portal and/or mesenteric venous resection does not increase the morbidity after PD or impact long-term survival as venous resection is often performed because of tumor location and not extent of disease. The disappointing experience with extended resections underscores the need for better adjuvant systemic strategies and the interdisciplinary care of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Duodenopancreatectomias: análise de 39 pacientes

OBJETIVO: Pretendemos neste estudo analisar 39 pacientes submetidos à duodenopancreatectomia. MÉTODO: No período de julho de 1998 a março de 2004, trinta e nove pacientes foram submetidos a duodenopancreatectomia no Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão. Foram analisados os dados epidemiológicos, o quadro clínico, os métodos radiológicos, as indicações da operação e as complicações encontradas . RESULTADOS: Havia 22 pacientes do sexo masculino (56,4%) e 17 pacientes do sexo feminino (43,6%) com média de idade de 54,9 anos (variação de 21-82 anos). O exame radiológico mais utilizado foi a tomografia computadorizada. O diagnóstico histológico definitivo revelou adenocarcinoma periampolar em 35 pacientes (89,7%), pancreatite crônica (três pacientes - 7,7%) e adenocarcinoma colo-retal (um paciente - 2,6%). O adenocarcinoma periampolar mais freqüente foi o carcinoma ductal do pâncreas (27 pacientes - 69,2%), seguido por carcinoma de papila de Vater ( cinco pacientes - 12,8%), adenocarcinoma duodenal (dois pacientes - 5,1%) e carcinoma de via biliar distal (um paciente - 2,6%). As complicações pulmonares foram as mais freqüentes sendo encontradas em cinco pacientes (12,8%), a sepse peritoneal em quatro pacientes (10,2%), fístula pancreática em três pacientes (7,6%) e a hemorragia0 intra-abdominal em três pacientes (7,6%). A mortalidade intra-hospitalar em 30 dias foi 10,2 % (quatro pacientes). CONCLUSÃO: A duodenopancreatectomia ainda está associada a morbidade considerável. Entretanto com uma seleção adequada destes pacientes este procedimento pode ser realizado de forma segura com melhores resultados.