Identification of amino acid residues of rat angiotensin II receptor for ligand binding by site directed mutagenesis

Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins

Direct structural data on receptors coupled to G proteins were obtained last year in the form of a low resolution projection map of rhodopsin. A large number of receptor sequences have now been determined and detailed analysis of these has provided structural information about the receptors. New results from site-directed mutagenesis experiments can be examined in conjunction with the structural information from sequence analysis and the rhodopsin map. The identification of constitutively active mutated receptors has influenced our understanding of normal receptor equilibria.

Structural analysis and regulation of angiotensin II receptors

Angiotensin (Ang II) is an octapeptide hormone that plays a crucial role in the maintenance of electrolyte homeostasis and cardiovascular function. The hemodynamic and cardiovascular effects o f Ang II are mediated by high-affinity cell-surface receptors of the AT(1) pharmacologic class. The mammalian AT(1) receptor has recently been cloned and found to encode a 359-amino-acid protein of 41,000 molecular weight. The AT, receptor belongs to the guanine nucleotide regulatory-proteincoupled receptor family and is coupled to the phospholipase C signal transduction pathway as evidenced by intracellular calcium mobilization and inositol trisphosphate production upon receptor activation. Cloning of the AT(1) receptor has facilitated the study of structure-function correlates and molecular mechanisms of receptor regulation, and will lead to substantial progress in elucidating the mechanisms governing Ang II actions.

Characterization of [3H]losartan receptors in isolated rat glomeruli

[3H]Losartan bound specifically to isolated rat glomeruli. Scatchard analysis revealed a single class of losartan binding sites with an apparent dissociation constant (KD) of 6.2 nM and a density of receptor sites (Bmax) of 1.2 pmol/mg protein. In comparison, [3H][Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II binding sites exhibited the same KD value (4.3 nM), but a considerably lower Bmax (52 fmol/mg protein). Moreover whereas [125I][Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II was almost equally displaced by angiotensin II, [Sar1,Ala8] angiotensin II and losartan, [3H]losartan was potently displaced by losartan only. Finally, [125I][Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II but not [3H]losartan binding sites were sensitive to guanosine triphosphate (GTP) gamma S and Dithiothreitol. These data, together with the recent demonstration of intrinsic effects of losartan, support the view that [3H]losartan does not label only the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1).

Immunological reactivity of angiotensin II receptor antagonists: possible implications for receptor binding sites

In the present study, we assessed the reactivity with seven anti-angiotensin II monoclonal antibodies of three nonpeptide and one peptide compounds described as selective antagonists of angiotensin II for AT1 (DuP 753, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-(hydroxymethyl)-1-[[2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) biphenyl-4-yl] methyl] imidazole; EXP 3174, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-(carboxylic acid)-1-[[2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) biphenyl-4-yl] methyl] imidazole) and AT2 receptor sites (CGP42112A, nicotinyl-Tyr-(N alpha-benzyloxycarbonyl-Arg)Lys-His-Pro-Ile-OH; PD123177, 1-[(4-amino-3-methylphenyl) methyl]-5-(diphenyl-acetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazol[4,5-c] pyridine 6-carboxylic acid), respectively. These studies were undertaken because the reactivity of the monoclonal antibodies with peptide analogs of angiotensin II and the three-dimensional structure of an angiotensin II-immunoglobulin Fab fragment complex strongly suggested that the conformations identified by the monoclonal antibodies were relevant to those involved in receptor binding as defined by biophysical models supported by structure activity studies. Surprisingly although three of the compounds were described as competitive inhibitors of angiotensin II, binding of the various monoclonal antibodies to either ovalbumin-coupled angiotensin II adsorbed to plastic wells or 125I-labeled angiotensin II in liquid phase was unaffected by any of the nonpeptide antagonists and CGP42112A up to 10(-4) M concentration. The antagonists also failed to bind to rabbit polyclonal anti-angiotensin II antibodies. Direct binding experiments in which solid phase-immobilized angiotensin II and DuP 753 conjugates were incubated with anti-angiotensin II or anti-DuP 753 monoclonal antibodies, did not show any cross-reactivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mutation of Asp74 of the rat angiotensin II receptor confers changes in antagonist affinities and abolishes G-protein coupling

Aspartic acid in the second transmembrane domain is a highly conserved amino acid among the G protein-coupled receptors and is functionally important for agonist binding and G-protein coupling in beta 2-adrenergic and luteinizing hormone receptors. To determine whether this aspartic acid is also involved in the function of the rat vascular angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1a), Asp74 was replaced either by asparagine or by glutamic acid. When expressed in CHO cells, the two mutants and the wild-type receptor displayed similarly high affinities for the agonist [Sar1, Tyr(125I)4]angiotensin II [where Sar is sarcosine and Tyr(125I) is monoiodinated tyrosine] and the other agonists: ([Sar1]angiotensin II > angiotensin II > angiotensin III >> angiotensin I). However, the Asn74 mutant shows striking differences in its affinity for some antagonists when compared with the wild-type receptor: the affinity for DUP753 was decreased 10-fold, whereas it was increased 6-fold for [Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II and 20-fold for CGP42112A. These pharmacological changes were associated with a major defect in transmembrane signaling, since angiotensin II was unable to stimulate inositol phosphate production and increase cytosolic Ca2+ concentration through the two mutated receptors, whereas a clear dose-dependent stimulation was observed in cells expressing the wild-type receptor. Angiotensin II was able to promote DNA synthesis through the wild type but not through the mutated receptors. These data indicate that the conserved Asp74 residue of the AT1a receptor is important for the binding of angiotensin II antagonists and is essential for the transmembrane signaling cascade.