The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer

Improvement in dose escalation using the process of adaptive radiotherapy combined with three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated beams for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Advances in technology allow the creation of complex treatment plans with tightly conforming doses. However, variations in positioning of the organ/patient with respect to treatment beams necessitate the use of an appreciable margin, potentially limiting dose escalation in many patients. To (1) reduce this margin and (2) test the hypothesis that the achievable level of dose escalation is patient dependent, a patient-specific, confidence-limited planning target volume (cl-PTV) was constructed using an adaptive radiotherapy (ART) process for prostate cancer treatment developed in-house. The potential dose escalation achievable with this ART process is quantified for both conformal radiotherapy (CRT) delivery and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with organ confined prostate cancer were entered prospectively into an ART process developed in-house. This ART process has been designed to improve accuracy and precision of dose delivery, consequently enhancing dose escalation. In this process, a cl-PTV is constructed for each patient in the second week of treatment based upon on-line portal and CT images acquired during the first week of treatment. The treatment prescription dose, defined as the minimum dose to the cl-PTV, is selected based on predefined dose-volume constraints for rectum/bladder and derived from the pretreatment planning CT image. In addition, the treatment modality (CRT or IMRT) is determined based on the level of dose escalation achievable and the risk of inaccurate targeting. The potential for both dose escalation and the application of IMRT was evaluated by comparing the prescription doses delivered using the ART process, with the cl-PTV, to those in the traditional treatment process, with a conventional generic PTV. In addition, the distributions of potential geometric target underdosing and normal tissue overdosing were also calculated to evaluate the quality of the conventional treatment plans.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty patients have been treated with the ART process. When compared to the treatment dose delivered with the conventional treatment process (generic PTV), an average 5% (2.5--10%) more dose could be delivered using the ART process with CRT, and 7.5% (2.5--15%) more dose could be delivered with IMRT. Of the 150 patients, 70% were treated to a minimum cl-PTV dose > or = 77.4 Gy (81.3 Gy ICRU isocenter dose). Dosimetric analysis revealed that 81 Gy to the cl-PTV (or 86.7 Gy ICRU) could be prescribed to at least 50% of patients if IMRT was applied using the ART process. In contrast, IMRT did not yield an obvious dose escalation gain if patients were treated using the generic PTV. Our results also demonstrate that the cl-PTV is significantly smaller than the conventional generic PTV for most patients, with a mean volume reduction of 24% (range, 5--43%).

CONCLUSION

These results support our hypothesis that the achievable level of dose escalation using ART is patient dependent. By using the ART process to develop a cl-PTV, one can (1) optimize the dose level, (2) increase the applicability of IMRT, and (3) improve the quality of dose delivery. The ART process provides the foundation to identify a suitable option (CRT or IMRT) for the delivery of a safe treatment and dose escalation. It is now our standard of practice for prostate cancer treatment.

Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to evaluate and compare the impact of two major histologic grading systems on failure-free survival in patients with prostate carcinoma who are treated with definitive radiation.

METHODS

Eligible patients for the current study had localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-4pN0M0, T3/4: 67%, median observation time: 69 months) and were treated with intent-to-cure external radiotherapy between 1989 and 1995. The specimens from 178 patients, obtained by needle biopsies, were reviewed simultaneously by two pathologists assigning World Health Organization (WHO) and Gleason grades. Three-tiered Gleason grouping distributed patients into three groups (those with a score < 7, those with a score of 7, and those with a score of 8--10), whereas two-tiered Gleason categorization distributed patients into two groups (those with a Gleason score of 7A, major 3 + minor 4 patients were added to the group of patients with a Gleason score < 7 and patients with a Gleason score of 7B, major 4 + minor 3 were added to the group of patients with a Gleason score of 8--10). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Three-tiered Gleason grouping resulted in a relatively even distribution of the patients (44 patients had a Gleason score < 7, 58 patients had a Gleason score of 7, and 76 patients had a Gleason score of 8--10) whereas 130 patients were determined to have Grade 2 tumors based on WHO criteria. Separating those patients with a Gleason score of 7 (score 3+4 vs. score 4+3) led to the two-tiered Gleason grouping (88 patients in the favorable group and 90 patients in the unfavorable group). The two-tiered Gleason grouping displayed differences with regard to failure-free survival with the lowest P values for all patients and separately for T1/2 versus T3/4 tumors. Together with T category and pretreatment prostate specific antigen, WHO grading, three-tiered Gleason grouping, and two-tiered Gleason grouping resulted in independent parameters in the Cox regression model. The proportional variance estimate confirmed the superior discrimination for survival of two-tiered Gleason grouping.

CONCLUSIONS

The equal allocation of patients to subgroups based on the Gleason system helps the clinician to overcome the dilemma of overrepresentation of Grade 2 patients as occurs with WHO grading. The Gleason grading system and, most likely, the two-tiered Gleason grouping appear to result in better prognostic separation of patients referred to radiotherapy for relatively advanced primary tumors. Therefore the authors recommend the routine use of Gleason grading for these patients.

Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with T2a-b, N0, M0 prostatic carcinoma

The current study was undertaken to evaluate the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) relapse free survival and the prognostic factors in a total of 38 patients with stages of T2a-b, N0, M0 prostate carcinoma treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Mean 69.63 Gy was given with 3D-CRT, the mean follow up time was 13.89 months, and the mean prebiopsied PSA level was 25.12 ng/ml. The 2-year PSA relapse free survival was 47.37% for the entire group. The 2-year PSA relapse free survival rates were 100% and 44.74% for the patients with Gleason score < or = 7 and greater than 7 (p < or = 0.05). Patients with prebiopsied PSA level < or = 10 ng/ml and the stages of T2a or T2b did not show any significant differences (p > or = 0.05). Although the few case number and short term follow up, in this study 3D-CRT was a new effective technique to prostate cancer for our institutes and the Gleason score was important predictor of PSA relapse free survival.

Planning, computer optimization, and dosimetric verification of a segmented irradiation technique for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To develop and verify a multisegment technique for prostate irradiation that results in better sparing of the rectal wall compared to a conventional three-field technique, for patients with a concave-shaped planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the rectal wall.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients have been selected with various degrees of overlap between PTV and rectal wall. The planned dose to the ICRU reference point is 78 Gy. The new technique consists of five beams, each having an open segment covering the entire PTV and several smaller segments in which the rectum is shielded. Segment weights are computer-optimized using an algorithm based on simulated annealing. The score function to be minimized consists of dose-volume constraints for PTV, rectal wall, and femoral heads. The resulting dose distribution is verified for each patient by using point measurements and line scans made with an ionization chamber in a water tank and by using film in a cylindrical polystyrene phantom.

RESULTS

The final number of segments in the five-field technique ranges from 7 to 9 after optimization. Compared to the standard three-field technique, the maximum dose to the rectal wall decreases by approximately 3 Gy for patients with a large overlap and 1 Gy for patients with no overlap, resulting in a reduction of the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) by a factor of 1.3 and 1.2, respectively. The mean dose to the PTV is the same for the two techniques, but the dose distribution is slightly less homogeneous with the five-field technique (Average standard deviation of five patients is 1.1 Gy and 1.7 Gy for the three-field and five-field technique, respectively). Ionization chamber measurements show that in the PTV, the calculated dose is in general within 1% of the measured dose. Outside the PTV, systematic dose deviations of up to 3% exist. Film measurements show that for the complete treatment, the position of the isodose lines in sagittal and coronal planes is calculated fairly accurately, the maximum distance between measured and calculated isodoses being 4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a relatively simple multisegment "step-and-shoot" technique that can be delivered within an acceptable time frame at the treatment machine (Extra time needed is approximately 3 minutes). The technique results in better sparing of the rectal wall compared to the conventional three-field technique. The technique can be planned and optimized relatively easily using automated procedures and a predefined score function. Dose calculation is accurate and can be verified for each patient individually.

Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To use portal imaging to measure daily on-line setup error and off-line prostatic motion in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to determine an optimum planning target volume (PTV) margin incorporating both setup error and organ motion.

RESULTS

A total of 2549 portal images from 33 patients were acquired over the course of the study. Of these patients, 23 were analyzed for setup errors while the remaining 10 were analyzed for prostatic motion. Setup errors were characterized by standard deviations of 1.8 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and 1.4 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction. Displacements due to prostatic motion, with standard deviations of 5.8 mm AP and 3.3 mm SI, were found to be more significant than setup errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account both setup errors and target organ motion, optimum PTV margins to ensure 95% coverage are 10.0 mm AP and 5.9 mm SI. The portal imaging protocol established in this study allows radiation therapists to accept or adjust a treatment setup based upon daily on-line image matching results. The successful localization of radiopaque fiducial markers on a significant number of portal images acquired in the study gives hope that more accurate on-line targeting verification may soon be possible through the visualization of the prostate itself as opposed to the surrounding bony structures of the pelvis.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis

PURPOSE

To report acute toxicity and to evaluate the relationship between dose-volume effects and acute toxicity in patients with localized prostate cancer, treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Acute toxicity (both lower gastrointestinal [GI] and genito-urinary [GU]) in 100 patients treated with IMRT definitively to a prescribed dose of 70 Gy were assessed using RTOG scoring criteria. A rectal balloon was used for prostate immobilization. Mean doses to seminal vesicles, prostate, bladder, and rectum were recorded. Average irradiated bladder and rectal volumes above 65, 70, and 75 Gy were assessed. A relationship between dose volume and clinical toxicity was evaluated. All patients completed the full duration of acute toxicity assessment.

RESULTS

Mean doses to the prostate and seminal vesicles were 75.8 and 73.9 Gy. This represents a moderate dose escalation. Acute GI toxicity profile was very favorable. Eleven percent and 6% of the patients had grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity, respectively, while 83% had no GI complaint. For GU complaints, 38% and 35% had grade 1 and 2 toxicity, respectively, while 27% had no complaints. There was no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU toxicity. Mean doses to the bladder were 22.8, 23.4, and 26.1 Gy for grade 0, 1, and 2 GU toxicity, respectively (p = 0.132). There is no statistically significant relationship between acute GU toxicity and the bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. In evaluating acute GI toxicity, there are very few grade 1 and 2 events. No relationship was found between acute rectal toxicity and mean rectal dose or irradiated rectal volumes receiving more than 65, 70, and 75 Gy.

CONCLUSION

The findings are important with regard to the safety of IMRT, especially in reducing acute GI toxicity. Dose escalation with IMRT using a prostate immobilization technique is feasible. The findings are also important because they contribute to the clinical and dosimetric correlation aspect in the use of IMRT to treat prostate cancer. A larger cohort may be needed to determine if there is a relationship between acute GU toxicity and (a) mean bladder dose and (b) irradiated bladder volume receiving > 65 Gy, > 70 Gy, or > 75 Gy. A larger cohort of patients treated to a higher dose may be needed to show a relationship between dose volume and acute GI toxicity.

Conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy--clinical data

Conformal radiotherapy (CRT) is based on three hypotheses: (i) a higher rate of local control can improve the survival rate; (ii) dose escalation can increase tumor control; and (iii) CRT allows the delivery of higher doses by decreasing the incidence of late effects. These postulates are now supported by several data. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has markedly progressed since its introduction two decades ago. However, there are situations for which 3D-CRT cannot produce a satisfactory treatment plan because of complex target volume shapes or the close proximity of sensitive normal tissues. This is why intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was introduced. Its aim is to overcome the limitations of 3D-CRT by adding modulators of beam intensity to beam shaping. IMRT can achieve nearly any dose distribution; however, the role of the planner remains crucial. CRT has been investigated mainly for prostate cancers and head and neck cancers. By and large, the clinical data, although still limited, seem to confirm the advantages of this type of radiotherapy. Dose escalation in prostate cancers improves the local control rate without increasing late effects and for this cancer site IMRT appears to be a significant advance over conventional 3D-CRT. In head and neck cancers the clinical data are still scarce but encouraging. CRT should be investigated in breast cancers with the aim of reducing the incidence of late effects. The available data underline the great potential for major progress in 3D-CRT and IMRT. The techniques are still costly and time consuming, nevertheless they merit investigation since their cost should decrease. Efforts should be concentrated on the specification of robust optimization criteria, taking into account clinical and radiobiological data.

Prediction of response to salvage radiation therapy in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To identify factors predictive of local recurrence as defined by a complete response to salvage radiation therapy in patients whose disease recurs after radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-five patients with recurrence after radical prostatectomy who were evaluated by prostatic fossa biopsies, and a subset of 49 of these patients treated with radiation for control of presumed or biopsy-proven local recurrence, were studied.

RESULTS

Biopsies were positive in 40 (42%) of the 95 biopsied patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that prebiopsy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, postrecurrence PSA doubling time, and positive digital rectal examination (DRE) of the prostatic fossa were all statistically significant predictors of a positive biopsy. For the 49 patients subsequently treated with salvage radiation therapy, the overall actuarial 3- and 5-year PSA relapse-free probabilities were 43% and 24%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed no differences in the PSA relapse-free probabilities associated with any pathologic features of the radical prostatectomy specimen, biopsy confirmation of local recurrence, or DRE of the prostatic fossa. In multivariate analysis, controlling for all other variables, preradiation PSA and postrecurrence PSA doubling time measured before radiation were the only statistically significant predictors of outcome.

CONCLUSION

DRE of the prostatic fossa, prebiopsy PSA, and postrecurrence PSA doubling time predict which patients will have biopsy-proven local recurrence. However, response to salvage radiation therapy is associated with postrecurrence PSA doubling time and with preradiation PSA level only. DRE of the prostatic fossa and biopsy confirmation of local recurrence are not associated with salvage radiation outcome.

Prognostic value of neuroendocrine serum markers and PSA in irradiated patients with pN0 localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with localized prostate cancer depends on clinical stage, histological grade, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We evaluated the additional prognostic impact of serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and chromograninA (CgA) after curative radiotherapy and the importance of serum PSA, analyzed 3 months after irradiation.

METHODS

From 1988 to 1995, 161 patients with localized T1-4, pN0M0, prostate adenocarcinoma were treated with external radiation (66Gy, 2Gy/5 fractions per week). Frozen serum samples were assessed for CgA, NSE, and PSA before and 3 months after radiotherapy. CgA was analyzed in only 100 patients. NSE and CgA were determined by a immunometric assay. Total PSA was measured by a time-resolved fluoro-immunometric assay.

RESULTS

Prior to radiotherapy CgA was elevated in 16 of 100 patients, and NSE was elevated in 33 of the 161 patients. There was no association between grade, T category or pretreatment PSA and the levels of neuroendocrine markers. Pretreatment-elevated serum NSE, but not initial CgA, identified patients with an unfavorable prognosis. A < 50% reduction of PSA 3 months after radiotherapy was associated with decreased failure-free 10 years urvival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an increased risk of failure for patients with elevated pretreatment NSE and PSA values, T3 category, and decline of PSA less than 50% 3 months after radiotherapy. The presence of none or several risk factors (1-4) defined clearly separable groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Together with T category and pretreatment serum PSA values, serum NSE values before radiotherapy and decrease of serum PSA 3 months after radiotherapy represent easily assessable prognostic parameters in patients undergoing curative radiation treatment for prostate cancer.

Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The present study was undertaken to assess the potential benefit of intensity modulated (IM) proton beams in optimizing the dose distribution to safely escalate the tumor dose in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four treatment plans were compared in a prostate cancer patient aiming to deliver 81 Gy to the target: 1) conformal 18 MV X-rays, 6-fields; 2) 214 MeV protons, 2-fields; 3) IM 15 MV X-rays, 5-fields; and 4) 177-200 Mev IM protons, 5-fields as in Plan 3. In addition, IM methods were used to further escalate the tumor dose to 99 Gy. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used to physically compare the treatment plans. DVH data were also used to obtain normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and tumor control probabilities.

RESULTS

Although the planning target volume dose distribution was satisfactory with the four treatment plans, the homogeneity was slightly reduced in both X-ray plans (IM and standard) and the low-to-medium doses delivered to all organs at risk, and other normal tissues were significantly reduced by both proton plans. For a prescribed dose of 81 Gy, only the IM X-ray and IM proton plans both succeeded in predicting an acceptably low NTCP for the rectum (<5%, Grade 3). The integral nontarget dose was significantly reduced with IM proton beams (i.e., 3.1, 1.3, and 1.7 times less than Plans 1, 2, and 3, respectively). When escalating the dose to 99 Gy, no additional improvement between IM protons and IM X-ray beams was observed.

CONCLUSION

Both IM X-ray and proton beams were able to optimize the dose distribution and comply with the goal of delivering the highest dose to the target while reducing the risk of severe morbidity to acceptable levels. The main advantage compared to IM X-rays was that IM protons succeeded in significantly reducing the low-to-medium dose to the nontarget tissues and achieved a small improvement in planning target volume (PTV) dose heterogeneity.

Toxicity following high-dose three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To report the toxicity profile of patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) receiving doses of 82 Gy or more to portions of their prostate.

METHODS

Forty-four patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer between June 1992 and August 1998 at the University of California, San Francisco received a maximal dose within the target volume (Dmax) of 82 Gy or more. Eighteen patients were boosted selectively to a limited portion of their prostate using IMRT, whereas 26 patients were treated with 3D-CRT and had unselected "hot spots" within their prostate. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute and late toxicity scales were used to score gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity.

RESULTS

Median follow-up and Dmax were 23.1 months (range 10.0 to 84.7) and 84.5 Gy (range 82.0 to 96.7), respectively. Of the patients, 59.1% and 34.1% developed some level of acute GU and GI toxicity, respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 acute GI toxicity. No other grade 3 or greater acute toxicity was observed. The 2-year actuarial rates for freedom from late GI and GU morbidity were 77.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.4% to 87.5%) and 79.5% (95% CI 62.7% to 89.3%), respectively. Although no grade 3 or greater late GU morbidity has been observed to date, 3 patients experienced grade 3 late GI morbidity. However, these cases involved rectal bleeding and were effectively managed with laser coagulation/fulguration.

CONCLUSIONS

Doses of 82 Gy or more to a portion of the prostate gland can be tolerated with acceptable morbidity. This observation supports the continued investigation of IMRT as a means for improving disease control in prostate cancer.

Computed tomography/magnetic resonance based volume changes of the primary tumour in patients with prostate cancer with or without androgen deprivation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate changes of the volume of the cancerous prostatic gland during androgen deprivation (AD) started immediately after diagnosis (IAD). Hypothetically, these data would assist the radiotherapist to determine the appropriate duration of pre-radiotherapy downsizing neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) treatment. A second aim was to assess any increase of the prostatic volume during the 1st year of diagnosis in patients who were allocated to a deferred treatment policy (DAD). METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirteen patients in the IAD cohort and 13 patients in the DAD group, all with T1-3pN1-2M0 prostate cancer, had regular computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) examinations during the 1st year after randomization within the EORTC-GU trial 30846. Pre-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) values were available in only 12 patients.

RESULTS

In the IAD group the prostate gland decreased with significant difference as compared with the DAD patients (P=0.033). As compared with the pre-treatment situation the prostate gland in the IAD group was reduced in size by 18, 35, and 46% at 1, 6, and 12 months, respectively. In four of six evaluable IAD patients the prostatic volume continued to shrink after achievement of the nadir PSA level (at 3 months). In three of the 13 DAD patients the prostate volume increased by >25% during the 1st 3 months after randomization.

CONCLUSION

If neoadjuvant androgen deprivation is applied before local treatment to downsize the volume of the cancerous prostate gland, our limited data suggest that such treatment should last at least 6 months in order to achieve a maximal effect in the majority of patients. In about 1/4 of untreated patients an increase in the prostate volume by >25% may occur within 3 months of diagnosis. If no AD is given, radiotherapy should start within this period.

Analysis of biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer using dose-distribution variables and tumor control probability models

PURPOSE

To investigate tumor control following three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) of prostate cancer and to identify dose-distribution variables that correlate with local control assessed through posttreatment prostate biopsies.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Data from 132 patients, treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), who had a prostate biopsy 2.5 years or more after 3D-CRT for T1c-T3 prostate cancer with prescription doses of 64.8-81 Gy were analyzed. Variables derived from the dose distribution in the PTV included: minimum dose (Dmin), maximum dose (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), dose to n% of the PTV (Dn), where n = 1%,...,99%. The concept of the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) was evaluated for different values of the surviving fraction at 2 Gy (SF(2)). Four tumor control probability (TCP) models (one phenomenologic model using a logistic function and three Poisson cell kill models) were investigated using two sets of input parameters, one for low and one for high T-stage tumors. Application of both sets to all patients was also investigated. In addition, several tumor-related prognostic variables were examined (including T-stage, Gleason score). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. The ability of the logistic regression models (univariate and multivariate) to predict the biopsy result correctly was tested by performing cross-validation analyses and evaluating the results in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, prescription dose (Dprescr), Dmax, Dmean, dose to n% of the PTV with n of 70% or less correlate with outcome (p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve for Dmean is 0.64. In contrast, Dmin (p = 0.6), D98 (p = 0.2) or D95 (p = 0.1) are not significantly correlated with outcome. The results for EUD depend on the input parameter SF(2): EUD correlates significantly with outcome for SF(2) of 0.4 or more, but not for lower SF(2) values. Using either of the two input parameters sets, all TCP models correlate with outcome (p < 0.05; ROC areas 0.60-0.62). Using T-stage dependent input parameters, the correlation is improved (logistic function: p < 0.01, ROC area 0.67, Poisson models: p < 0.01, ROC areas 0.64-0.66). In comparison, the ROC area is 0.68 for the combination of Dmean and T-stage. After multivariate analysis, a model based on TCP, D20 and Gleason score is the best overall model (ROC area 0.73). However, an alternative model based on Dmean, Gleason score, and T-stage is competitive (ROC area 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Biopsy outcome after 3D-CRT of prostate cancer at MSKCC is not correlated with Dmin in the PTV and appears to be insensitive to cold spots in the dose distribution. This observation likely reflects the fact that much of the PTV, especially at the periphery, may not contain viable tumor cells and that the treatment margins were sufficiently large. Therefore, the predictive power of all variables which are sensitive to cold spots, like TCPs with Poisson models and EUD for low SF(2), is limited because the low dose region may not coincide with the tumor location. Instead, for MSKCC prostate cancer patients with their standardized CTV definition, substantial target motion and small dose inhomogeneities, Dmean (or any variable that downplays the effect of cold spots) is a very good predictor of biopsy outcome. While our findings may indicate a general problem in the application of current TCP models to clinical data, these conclusions should not be extrapolated to other disease sites without careful analysis.

Survival advantage from higher-dose radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer treated on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effect of external-beam radiation therapy on disease-specific survival (death from causes related to prostate cancer) and overall survival in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

From 1975 to 1992, 1,465 men with clinically localized prostate cancer received radiation therapy on four Radiation Therapy Oncology Group phase III randomized trials and were pooled for this analysis. No one received androgen-deprivation therapy with his initial treatment. All original histology had central pathologic review for grading using the Gleason classification system. Total delivered radiation dose ranged from 60 to 78 Gy (median, 68.4 Gy). The median follow-up time was 8 years.

RESULTS

A Cox regression model revealed that Gleason score was an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. The 10-year disease-specific survival rates by Gleason score were as follows: score of 2 through 5, 85%; score of 6, 79%; score of 7, 62%; and score of 8 through 10, 43%. Stratifying outcome by this important prognostic factor revealed that higher radiation dose was a significant predictor for improved disease-specific survival and overall survival only for those patients whose cancers had Gleason scores of 8 through 10 (P <.05). After adjusting for clinical T stage, nodal status, and age, treating with a higher radiation dose was associated with a 29% lower relative risk of death from prostate cancer and 27% reduced mortality rate (P <.05).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that higher-dose radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of dying from prostate cancer in men with clinically localized disease. This survival benefit is restricted to men with poorly differentiated cancers.

Interim report of image-guided conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer: the William Beaumont phase II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

We analyzed our institution's experience treating patients with unfavorable prostate cancer in a prospective Phase II dose-escalating trial of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) integrated with conformal high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boosts. This interim report discusses treatment outcome and prognostic factors using this treatment approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From November 1991 through February 1998, 142 patients with unfavorable prostate cancer were prospectively treated in a dose-escalating trial with pelvic EBRT in combination with outpatient HDR brachytherapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Patients with any of the following characteristics were eligible: pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >/= 10.0 ng/ml, Gleason score >/= 7, or clinical stage T2b or higher. All patients received pelvic EBRT to a median total dose of 46.0 Gy. Pelvic EBRT was integrated with ultrasound-guided transperineal conformal interstitial iridium-192 HDR implants. From 1991 to 1995, 58 patients underwent three conformal interstitial HDR implants during the first, second, and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. After October 1995, 84 patients received two interstitial implants during the first and third weeks of pelvic EBRT. The dose delivered via interstitial brachytherapy was escalated from 5.50 Gy to 6.50 Gy for each implant in those patients receiving three implants, and subsequently, from 8.25 Gy to 9.50 Gy per fraction in those patients receiving two implants. To improve implant quality and reduce operator dependency, an on-line, image-guided interactive dose optimization program was utilized during each HDR implant. No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 2.1 years (range: 0.2-7.2 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

The pretreatment PSA level was >/= 10.0 ng/ml in 51% of patients. The biopsy Gleason score was >/= 7 in 58% of cases, and 75% of cases were clinical stage T2b or higher. Despite the high frequency of these poor prognostic factors, the actuarial biochemical control rate was 89% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment PSA level, higher Gleason score, higher PSA nadir level, and shorter time to nadir were associated with biochemical failure. In the entire population, 14 patients (10%) experienced clinical failure at a median interval of 1.7 years (range: 0.2-4.5 years) after completing RT. The 5-year actuarial clinical failure rate was 22%. The 5-year actuarial rates of local failure and distant metastasis were 16% and 14%, respectively. For all patients, the 5-year disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival rates were 89%, 95%, and 96%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial rate of RTOG Grade 3 late complications was 9% with no patient experiencing Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic EBRT in combination with image-guided conformal HDR brachytherapy boosts appears to be an effective treatment for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer with minimal associated morbidity. Our dose-escalating trial will continue.

An evaluation of three-field coplanar plans for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A series of coplanar three-field configurations for two different clinical treatment volumes, prostate only (PO) and prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV) were studied to determine the optimal three-field plan arrangement for prostate radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A variety of conformal three-field 6 MV plans prescribed to both 64 and 74 Gy were created for PO and PSV volumes in each of ten patients. For description, the orientation of each sequential beam was named in a clockwise fashion. Plans included series with arrangements of 0 degrees, 60-150 degrees, 210-300 degrees; 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 225-255 degrees; 90 degrees, 210-240 degrees, 300-330 degrees and a four-field (4F) box plan for comparison. Six-hundred and eighty plans were compared using the rectal volume irradiated to greater than 50% (V(50)), 80% (V(80)), and 90% (V(90)) of the prescribed dose, normal tissue complications (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads (FH), and tumour control probabilities (TCP). FH tolerance was set at 52 Gy to 10% volume.

RESULTS

In comparing the 34 different three-field configurations for each of the PO and PSV groups, the greatest rectal sparing was achieved by a three-field plan with gantry angles of 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees (PO: rectal V(80)=22.8+/-5.5% (1S.D.), V(90)=18.4+/-5.7%, and PSV: rectal V(80)=41.9+/-5.8%, V(90)=35.5+/-5.9%). This also improved on the 4F-box plan (PO: rectal V(80)=26.0+/-5.8%, V(90)=21.4+/-5.2%, P<0.001; and PSV: rectal V(80)=47.3+/-5.5%, V(90)=41.6+/-5.1%, P<0.001). The worst rectal sparing was seen with the 0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees plan (PO: rectal V(80)=35.2+/-8.0%, V(90)=30.3+/-7.1%, P<0.001; and PSV: rectal V(80)=65.7+/-9.0%, V(90)=58.8+/-8.8%, P<0.001). In the PO group, the increase in predicted rectal NTCP with dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy was 3.3% using the 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees plan, 4.7% with the 4F-box plan, and 6.9% with the 0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees plan. In the PSV group, dose escalation increased the predicted rectal NTCP by 7.9, 10.1 and 15.7% for the 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees plan, 4F-box plan, and 0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees plan, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For both PO and PSV volumes, the three-field plan which afforded the greatest rectal sparing with acceptable bladder and femoral head doses was the 0 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees plan. This plan also improved on the 4F-box. The increase in predicted rectal NTCP when escalating dose from 64 to 74 Gy was smaller using this plan compared to either the three-field 0 degrees, 120 degrees, 240 degrees plan or the 4F-box plan.

Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406

PURPOSE

A prospective Phase I dose escalation study was conducted to determine the maximally-tolerated radiation dose in men treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) for localized prostate cancer. This is a preliminary report of toxicity encountered on the 3DOG/RTOG 9406 study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Each participating institution was required to implement data exchange with the RTOG 3D quality assurance (QA) center at Washington University in St. Louis. 3D CRT capabilities were strictly defined within the study protocol. Patients were registered according to three stratification groups: Group 1 patients had clinically organ-confined disease (T1,2) with a calculated risk of seminal vesicle invasion of < 15%. Group 2 patients had clinical T1,2 disease with risk of SV invasion > or = 15%. Group 3 (G3) patients had clinical local extension of tumor beyond the prostate capsule (T3). All patients were treated with 3D techniques with minimum doses prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV). The PTV margins were 5-10 mm around the prostate for patients in Group 1 and 5-10 mm around the prostate and SV for Group 2. After 55.8 Gy, the PTV was reduced in Group 2 patients to 5-10 mm around the prostate only. Minimum prescription dose began at 68.4 Gy (level I) and was escalated to 73.8 Gy (level II) and subsequently to 79.2 Gy (level III). This report describes the acute and late toxicity encountered in Group 1 and 2 patients treated to the first two study dose levels. Data from RTOG 7506 and 7706 allowed calculation of the expected probability of observing a > or = grade 3 late effect more than 120 days after the start of treatment. RTOG toxicity scores were used.

RESULTS

Between August 23, 1994 and July 2, 1997, 304 Group 1 and 2 cases were registered; 288 cases were analyzable for toxicity. Acute toxicity was low, with 53-54% of Group 1 patients having either no or grade 1 toxicity at dose levels I and II, respectively. Sixty-two percent of Group 2 patients had either none or grade 1 toxicity at either dose level. Few patients (0-3%) experienced a grade 3 acute bowel or bladder toxicity, and there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Late toxicity was very low in all patient groups. The majority (81-85%) had either no or mild grade 1 late toxicity at dose level I and II, respectively. A single late grade 3 bladder toxicity in a Group 2 patient treated to dose level II was recorded. There were no grade 4 or 5 late effects in any patient. Compared to historical RTOG controls (studies 7506, 7706) at dose level I, no grade 3 or greater late effects were observed in Group 1 and Group 2 patients when 9.1 and 4.8 events were expected (p = 0.003 and p = 0.028), respectively. At dose level II, there were no grade 3 or greater toxicities in Group 1 patients and a single grade 3 toxicity in a Group 2 patient when 12.1 and 13.0 were expected (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0003), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the relative risk of developing acute bladder toxicity was 2.13 if the percentage of the bladder receiving > or = 65 Gy was more than 30% (p = 0.013) and 2.01 if patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (p = 0.018). The relative risk of developing late bladder complications also increased as the percentage of the bladder receiving > or = 65 Gy increased (p = 0.026). Unexpectedly, there was a lower risk of late bladder complications as the mean dose to the bladder and prescription dose level increased. This probably reflects improvement in conformal techniques as the study matured. There was a 2.1 relative risk of developing a late bowel complication if the total rectal volume on the planning CT scan exceeded 100 cc (p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Tolerance to high-dose 3D CRT has been better than expected in this dose escalation trial for Stage T1,2 prostate cancer compared to low-dose RTOG historical experience. With strict quality assurance standards and review, 3D CRT can be safely studied in a co

Optimization of coplanar six-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal coplanar treatment technique for six-field conformal radiotherapy of prostate only (PO) or prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A series of 6-MV six-field coplanar treatment plans were created for PO and PSV volumes in 10 patients prescribed to both 64 and 74 Gy. All plans consisted of laterally-symmetric anterior oblique, lateral, and posterior oblique fields. The posterior oblique fields were varied through 20-45 degrees relative to the lateral fields, and for each of these angles, the anterior oblique fields were varied through 25-65 degrees relative to lateral. The plans were compared by means of rectal volumes irradiated to 80% or more of the prescribed dose (V80); normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for rectum, bladder, and femoral heads; and tumor control probability (TCP). Femoral head tolerance was designated as 52 Gy to no more than 10% volume.

RESULTS

For the PO group, anterior oblique fields at 50 degrees from lateral and posterior oblique fields at 25 degrees from lateral produced the lowest V80, together with femoral head doses which were appropriate for most patients (V80 = 24.4+/-5.3% [1 SD]). Compared to a commonly-used six-field (reference) plan with both anterior and posterior oblique fields at 35 degrees from lateral (V80 = 26.3+/-5.9%), this represented an improvement (p = 0.001). For the PSV group, the optimal anterior and posterior oblique fields were at 65 degrees and 30 degrees from lateral, respectively (V80 = 47.5+/-6.3%). Relative to the reference plan (V80 = 49.4+/-5.6%), this was a marginal improvement (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

The optimized six-field plans provide increased rectal sparing at both standard and escalated doses. Moreover, the gain in TCP resulting from dose escalation can be achieved with a smaller increase in rectal NTCP using the optimized six-field plans.

Comparison of prostate cancer treatment in two institutions: a quality control study

PURPOSE

To minimize differences in the treatment planning procedure between two institutions within the context of a radiotherapy prostate cancer trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two patients with N0 M0 prostate cancer underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan for radiotherapy treatment planning. For all patients, the tumor and organs at risk were delineated, and a treatment plan was generated for a three-field technique giving a dose of 78 Gy to the target volume. Ten of the 22 cases were delineated and planned in the other institution as well. The delineated volumes and dose distributions were compared.

RESULTS

All treatments fulfilled the trial criteria. The mean volume ratio of the gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in both institutions was 1.01, while the mean volume ratio of the planning target volumes (PTVs) was 0.88. The three-dimensional (3D) PTV difference was 3 mm at the prostate apex and 6-8 mm at the seminal vesicles. This PTV difference was mainly caused by a difference in the method of 3D expansion, and disappeared when applying an improved algorithm in one institution. The treated volume (dose > or =95% of isocenter dose) reflects the size of the PTV and the conformity of the treatment technique. This volume was on average 66 cm3 smaller in institution A than in institution B; the effect of the PTV difference was 31 cm3 and the difference in technique accounted for 36 cm3. The mean delineated rectal volume including filling was 112 cm3 and 125 cm3 for institution A and B, respectively. This difference had a significant impact on the relative dose volume histogram (DVH) of the rectum.

CONCLUSION

Differences in GTV delineation were small and comparable to earlier quantified differences between observers in one institution. Different expansion methods for generation of the PTV significantly influenced the amount of irradiated tissue. Strict definitions of target and normal structures are mandatory for reliable trial results.

Curative external beam radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: results in 231 patients treated in Lyon

BACKGROUND

Radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are the mainstays of treatment of prostate cancer with curative intent. The possible development of radiation proctitis and rectal bleeding are major concerns when using EBRT. Recently, conformal radiotherapy has been introduced in an attempt to improve the results of EBRT. This paper presents an overview of the Lyon experience using standard EBRT with doses of 68 Gy, and reports the preliminary results of a study of conformal radiotherapy with dose escalation.

METHODS

From 1981 to 1995, EBRT was used to treat 231 patients with localized adenocarcinomas of the prostate. The dose of EBRT was 68 Gy/34 fractions/7 weeks using a four-field box technique with 18-MeV photons. A feasibility study of conformal radiotherapy was commenced in 1996. To date, 145 patients have been treated with doses escalating from 68 to 80 Gy.

RESULTS

In the EBRT group of 231 patients, the 5-year overall survival was 80.3%. Anorectal function was scored as excellent in 90% of patients. Rectal bleeding was seen in 14.3% of patients and required local treatment in only seven. In the group treated with conformal radiotherapy, the preliminary results indicate good early tolerance.

CONCLUSION

The curative treatment of patients with prostate cancer using EBRT gives good long-term survival with low rectal toxicity. Conformal radiotherapy appears to be an interesting approach to improve local control and perhaps survival.

Prostate brachytherapy: treatment strategies

PURPOSE

Patients who present with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer may be candidates for prostate brachytherapy. We evaluated the treatment outcomes in a diverse group of prostate cancer patients who presented with low, moderate and high risk features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 301 patients who presented with T1 to T3 prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy alone or combined with hormonal therapy and/or external beam irradiation. Of these patients 109 at low risk with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 10 ng./ml. or less, Gleason score 6 or less and clinical stage T2a or less were treated with 125iodine alone, 152 at moderate risk with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml., Gleason score greater than 6 or stage T2b or greater were treated with 125iodine or 103palladium or combined implant alone with 5 months of hormonal therapy, and 40 at high risk with PSA greater than 15 ng./ml., Gleason 8 or greater, clinical stage T2c to T3 or positive seminal vesicle biopsy (20) were treated with combination brachytherapy, external beam irradiation and 9 months of hormonal therapy. Patients with a positive seminal vesicle biopsy (T3c disease) and negative pelvic lymph nodes were included in the high risk group, and the walls of the seminal vesicles were also treated with implantation. Followup was performed every 6 months with digital rectal examination and ultrasound evaluation. Prostate biopsy was routinely recommended 2 years after completion of the radiation. Failure was defined as PSA increase on 2 consecutive determinations above 1 ng./ml. or evidence of local recurrence on digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound or biopsy. Kaplan-Meier projections were used to calculate progression-free survival rates.

RESULTS

Of the 109 patients at low risk followed from 1 to 7 years (median 18 months) 91% were free of PSA failure at 4 years. No patient experienced urinary incontinence following implantation, although grade 1 to 2 radiation proctitis occurred in 5 (4.5%). Of the 152 patients at moderate risk 73 received implantation and 79 received implantation combined with hormonal therapy. The 4-year biochemical freedom from failure rate for the hormone group was 85% versus 58% for the no hormone group (p = 0.08). The difference was more significant for those with Gleason score 7 or greater (90 versus 43%, p = 0.01) and for those with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml. (87 versus 59%, p = 0.04). Grade 1 to 2 radiation proctitis occurred in 1 of the 79 patients (1.3%) receiving hormonal therapy and in 3 (4%) treated with implantation only. There were no cases of urinary incontinence. Of the 40 patients at high risk 71% were free of biochemical failure at 3 years. Of the 4 patients with failure (10%) 3 (75%) originally had positive seminal vesicle biopsies. Five patients experienced gastrointestinal complications, although none was grade 3 or 4. The actuarial freedom from grade 2 proctitis was 82%. No patient experienced urinary incontinence. Prostate biopsies were negative in 87% of the low risk, 96.8 (hormone group) versus 68.6% (no hormone group) of the moderate risk (p = 0.0023) and 86% of the high risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy appears to offer comparable results to external beam irradiation and radical prostatectomy when patients are stratified by disease extent. Adopting a strategy of implant alone, implant with hormonal therapy or implant with hormonal therapy and external beam irradiation in patients who present with low to high risk features can improve the overall results in the more advanced cases.

Long term tolerance of high dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The current study was undertaken to evaluate the incidence and predictors of late toxicity in patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with high dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

METHODS

A total of 743 patients with prostate carcinoma classified as T1c-T3 were treated with 3D-CRT that targeted the prostate and seminal vesicles. A minimum tumor dose of 64.8 gray (Gy) was given to 96 patients (13%), 70.2 Gy to 266 patients (365), 75.6 Gy to 320 patients (43%), and 81.0 Gy to 61 patients (8%). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 18-109 months). Late toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scoring scale.

RESULTS

Late gastrointestinal (GI) and urinary (GU) toxicities were absent or minimal (Grade 0 or 1) in 90% of patients. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of the development of Grade 2 and 3 late GI toxicities was 11% and 0.75%, respectively. A multivariate analysis identified doses > or =75.6 Gy (P<0.001), history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.01), and the presence of acute GI symptoms during treatment (P = 0.02) as independent predictors of Grade > or =2 late GI toxicity. The 5-year actuarial likelihood of the development of Grade 2 and 3 late GU toxicities was 10% and 3%, respectively. Doses > or =75.6 Gy (P = 0.008) and acute GU symptoms (P<0.001) were independent predictors of Grade > or =2 late GU toxicity. Among 544 patients who were potent before treatment (73% of all patients), 211 (39%) became impotent after 3D-CRT. The 5-year actuarial risk of potency loss was 60%. Doses > or =75.6 Gy (P<0.001) and the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation (P = 0.01) were independent predictors of posttreatment erectile dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of severe late complications after high dose 3D-CRT was minimal. Radiation doses > or =75.6 Gy and the presence of acute treatment-related symptoms during 3D-CRT correlated with a higher incidence of Grade > or =2 late GI and GU toxicities. In addition to higher doses, the use of androgen deprivation therapy increased the likelihood of permanent impotence in these patients. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, which makes it possible to enhance the conformality of the dose distribution, has recently been implemented in an attempt to reduce the incidence of moderate grade toxicities in patients receiving high dose 3D-CRT.

Conformal proton beam therapy of prostate cancer--update on the Loma Linda University medical center experience

BACKGROUND

The ability to eradicate localized prostate cancer is dependent upon the radiation dose which can be delivered to the prostate. This dose is often limited by the tolerance of normal organs (rectum, bladder). Conformal beam therapy takes advantage of the unique depth dose characteristics of heavy charged particles (the Bragg Peak) to escalate the radiation dose delivered to the prostate while minimizing treatment-related toxicity.

METHOD

643 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with protons alone or a combination of protons and photons. All treatment was planned on a 3-D planning system and all received doses between 74-75 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) at 1.8-2.0 CGE/day. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response to treatment.

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates for the entire group are 89 and 79% respectively. A statistically significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival was seen between patients in the "early" (T1b-2b, PSA < 15) and "advanced" (T1b-2b, PSA > 15 or T2c-T4, PSA < 50) subgroups (89% vs. 68% at 4.5 years, p < 0.001). A PSA nadir of less than 0.51 ng/ml predicted for the highest chance of freedom from biochemical recurrence. Minimal radiation proctitis was seen in 21% of patients; toxicity of greater severity was seen in less than 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Conformal proton beams therapy produced high rates of response and minimal toxicity. A phase III dose escalation trial is in progress to help define the optimum radiation dose for the treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

A comparison of coplanar four-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the prostate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conformal radiotherapy of the prostate is an increasingly common technique, but the optimal choice of beam configuration remains unclear. This study systematically compares a number of coplanar treatment plans for four-field irradiation of two different clinical treatment volumes: prostate only (PO) and the prostate plus seminal vesicles (PSV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A variety of four-field coplanar treatment plans were created for PO and PSV volumes in each of ten patients. Plans included a four-field 'box' plan, a symmetric plan having bilateral anterior and posterior oblique fields, a plan with anterior oblique and lateral fields, a series of asymmetric plans, and a three-field plan having anterior and bilateral fields for comparison. Doses of 64 and 74 Gy were prescribed to the isocentre. Plans were compared using the volume of rectum irradiated to greater than 50% (V50), 80% (V80) and 90% (V90) of the prescribed dose. Tumour control probabilities (TCP) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for the rectum, bladder and femoral heads were also evaluated. Femoral head dose was limited such that less than 10% of each femoral head received 70% of the prescribed dose.

RESULTS

For the PO group, the optimal plan consisted of anterior oblique and lateral fields (Rectal V80 = 23.8+/-5.0% (1 SD)), while the box technique (V80 = 26.0+/-5.8%) was less advantageous in terms of rectal sparing (P = 0.001). Similar results were obtained for the PSV group (Rectal V80 = 43.9+/-5.0% and 47.3+/-5.5% for the two plan types, respectively, P = 0.001). The three-field plan was comparable to the optimal four-field plan but gave higher superficial body dose. With dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy, the mean TCP for the optimal plan rose from 52.0+/-2.8% to 74.1+/-2.0%. Meanwhile, rectal NTCP for the optimal plan rose by 3.5% (PO) or 8.4% (PSV), compared to 4.7% (PO) or 10.1% (PSV) for the box plan.

CONCLUSIONS

For PO volumes, a plan with gantry angles of 35 degrees, 90 degrees, 270 degrees and 325 degrees offers a high level of rectal sparing and acceptable dose to the femoral heads for all patients, while for PSV volumes, the corresponding plan has gantry angles of 20 degrees, 90 degrees , 270 degrees and 340 degrees. Using these plans, the gain in TCP resulting from dose escalation can be achieved with a smaller increase in anticipated rectal NTCP.

Calculated effects of displacement errors in external beam radiotherapy of prostatic adenocarcinoma

In order to evaluate the impact on the biological effective dose (BED) of irradiation delivered to a tumour with large displacement errors (LDE) and to estimate the effect on local control, simulated treatment of prostatic adenocarcinoma was performed. The calculation of BED in combination with the critical-voxel model and the LQ model was used to evaluate the effect of different combinations of LDEs. The model is called the Dose Volume Inhomogeneity Corrected BED (DVIC-BED) model. The dose-response curve was assumed to follow Poisson statistics. Different combinations of radiobiological parameters were used to test the model. A simulated clinical treatment with a dose of 66-80 Gy in 2 Gy fractions was carried out to evaluate displacement errors and non-optimal dose distributions. Five random LDEs excluding 33% of the target volume corresponded to an overall dose reduction of 3-5 Gy compared with a 10 Gy reduction if 100% of the target is missed five times. A 5 Gy decrease in dose corresponds to a reduction in clinical or chemical control up to 10-25% in the interval 65-85 Gy. LDEs in different directions are less deleterious than errors occurring in the same direction. Different alpha/beta-ratios (3-15) had little effect on the DIC-BED, but the effect of different alpha values (0.05, 0.2 and 0.5) was large. However, the results depend on radiobiological parameters for prostatic adenocarcinoma, which not are well known, and further studies in the field should be encouraged.

Comparison of the conventional 'box technique' with two different 'conformal' beam arrangements for prostate cancer treatment

PURPOSE

To quantify the possible advantages arising from the use of 'conformal' radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer, and to compare the dose distributions obtained with two different 'conformal' techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve patients with localized prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. For each patient, three techniques were planned: the standard 'box technique' (A), a four-fields 'conformal' technique (B), and a 6-fields conformal technique (C). For each of the 36 3D plans, dose-volume histograms (DVH) were obtained, along with the mean, maximum and minimum doses for the clinical and planning target volumes (CTV, PTV) for the rectum, the bladder, and the femoral heads. The resulting data were compared.

RESULTS

On average, the standard technique resulted in the exposure of a significantly larger bladder volume to the higher doses; a similar, but less remarkable difference has been observed for the rectal volume. The coverage of the PTV appears to be significantly more homogeneous with the two conformal techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented here add to the evidence available in the literature and suggest a possible advantage of both the conformal techniques over the standard 'box technique' for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The 6-field conformal technique does not seem superior to the four field one.

The delta-TCP concept: a clinically useful measure of tumor control probability

PURPOSE

The aim of this article is to provide a quantitative tool to evaluate the influence of the different dose regions in a non-uniformly irradiated tumour upon the probability of controlling that tumor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

First, a method to generate a distribution of the probability of controlling the cells in a voxel (VCP) is explored and found not to be useful. Second, we introduce the concept of delta-TCP, which represents the gain or loss in the overall TCP as a result of each particular bin in a DVH not receiving the prescribed dose (the same concept is applicable to dose cubes or to a fraction of the bin). The delta-TCP method presented here is based on the Poisson TCP model, but any other model could also be used. Third, using this tool, with parameters appropriate to Stage C prostate tumors, the consequences of "cold" and "hot" dose regions have been explored.

RESULTS

We show that TCP is affected by the minimum dose, even if it is delivered to a very small volume (20% dose deficit to 5% of the volume makes the TCP decrease by 18%), and that a hot region may be "wasted" unless the boost is to the bulk of the volume. An example of the application of the delta-TCP concept to a prostate radiotherapy plan is also given.

CONCLUSION

The delta-TCP distribution adds more objective information to the original DVH by enabling the clinician or planner to directly evaluate the effects of a non-uniform dose distribution on local control.

Conformal proton therapy for early-stage prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of proton radiation on clinical and biochemical outcomes for early prostate cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred nineteen patients with T1-T2b prostate cancer and initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels 15.0 ng/mL or less received conformal radiation doses of 74 to 75 cobalt gray equivalent with protons alone or combined with photons. No patient had pre- or post-treatment hormonal therapy until disease progression was documented. Patients were evaluated for biochemical disease-free survival, PSA nadir, and toxicity; the mean and median follow-up period was 43 months.

RESULTS

Overall 5-year clinical and biochemical disease-free survival rates were 97% and 88%, respectively. Initial PSA level, stage, and post-treatment PSA nadir were independent prognostic variables for biochemical disease-free survival: a PSA nadir 0.5 ng/mL or less was associated with a 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rate of 98%, versus 88% and 42% for nadirs 0.51 to 1.0 and greater than 1.0 ng/mL, respectively. No severe treatment-related morbidity was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that patients treated with conformal protons have 5-year biochemical disease-free survival rates comparable to those who undergo radical prostatectomy, and display no significant toxicity. A Phase III randomized dose-escalation trial is underway to define the optimum radiation dose for early-stage prostate cancer.

In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy

In this critical review of the current practice of patient dose verification, we first demonstrate that a high accuracy (about 1-2%, 1 SD) can be obtained. Accurate in vivo dosimetry is possible if diodes and thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs), the main detector types in use for in vivo dosimetry, are carefully calibrated and the factors influencing their sensitivity are taken into account. Various methods and philosophies for applying patient dose verification are then evaluated: the measurement of each field for each fraction of each patient, a limited number of checks for all patients, or measurements of specific patient groups, for example, during total body irradiation (TBI) or conformal radiotherapy. The experience of a number of centers is then presented, providing information on the various types of errors detected by in vivo dosimetry, including their frequency and magnitude. From the results of recent studies it can be concluded that in centers having modern equipment with verification systems as well as comprehensive quality assurance (QA) programs, a systematic error larger than 5% in dose delivery is still present for 0.5-1% of the patient treatments. In other studies, a frequency of 3-10% of errors was observed for specific patient groups or when no verification system was present at the accelerator. These results were balanced against the additional manpower and other resources required for such a QA program. It could be concluded that patient dose verification should be an essential part of a QA program in a radiotherapy department, and plays a complementary role to treatment-sheet double checking. As the radiotherapy community makes the transition from the conventional two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) conformal and intensity modulated dose delivery, it is recommended that new treatment techniques be checked systematically for a few patients, and to perform in vivo dosimetry a few times for each patient for situations where errors in dose delivery should be minimized.

Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study

PURPOSE

To determine, in three-dimensions, the difference between prostate delineation in magnetic resonance (MR) and computer tomography (CT) images for radiotherapy treatment planning.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three radiation oncologists, considered experts in the field, outlined the prostate without seminal vesicles both on CT, and axial, coronal, and sagittal MR images for 18 patients. To compare the resulting delineated prostates, the CT and MR scans were matched in three-dimensions using chamfer matching on bony structures. The volumes were measured and the interscan and interobserver variation was determined. The spatial difference between delineation in CT and MR (interscan variation) as well as the interobserver variation were quantified and mapped three-dimensionally (3D) using polar coordinates. A urethrogram was performed and the location of the tip of the dye column was compared with the apex delineated in CT and MR images.

RESULTS

Interscan variation: CT volumes were larger than the axial MR volumes in 52 of 54 delineations. The average ratio between the CT and MR volumes was 1.4 (standard error of mean, SE: 0.04) which was significantly different from 1 (p < 0.005). Only small differences were observed between the volumes outlined in the various MR scans, although the coronal MR volumes were smallest. The CT derived prostate was 8 mm (standard deviation, SD: 6 mm) larger at the base of the seminal vesicles and 6 mm (SD 4 mm) larger at the apex of the prostate than the axial MRI. Similar figures were obtained for the CT and the other MRI scans. Interobserver variation: The average ratio between the volume derived by one observer for a particular scan and patient and the average volume was 0.95, 0.97, and 1.08 (SE 0.01) for the three observers, respectively. The 3D pattern of the overall observer variation (1 SD) for CT and axial MRI was similar and equal to 3.5 to 2.8 mm at the base of the seminal vesicles and 3 mm at the apex.

CONCLUSION

CT-derived prostate volumes are larger than MR derived volumes, especially toward the seminal vesicles and the apex of the prostate. This interscan variation was found to be larger than the interobserver variation. Using MRI for delineation of the prostate reduces the amount of irradiated rectal wall, and could reduce rectal and urological complications.

Conformal proton therapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role and optimum dose of radiation to eradicate prostate cancer continues to be evaluated. Protons offer an opportunity to increase the radiation dose to the prostate while minimizing treatment toxicity.

METHODS

Six hundred forty-three patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with protons, with or without photons. Treatments were planned with a 3D planning system; patients received 74-75 CGE (Cobalt Gray Equivalent) at 1.8-2.0 CGE per fraction. Patients were evaluated for response to therapy and treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

The overall clinical disease-free survival rate was 89% at 5 years. When post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was used as an endpoint for disease control, the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate was 100% for patients with an initial PSA of < 4.0 ng/ml, and 89%, 72%, and 53% for patients with initial PSA levels of 4.1-10.0, 10.1-20.0, and > 20.0, respectively. Patients in whom the post-treatment PSA nadir was below 0.5 ng/ml did significantly better than those whose nadir values were between 0.51-1.0 or > 1.0 ng/ml: the corresponding 5-year disease-free survival rates were 91%, 79%, and 40%, respectively. Minimal radiation proctitis was seen in 21% of patients; toxicity of greater severity was seen in less than 1%.

CONCLUSION

Proton therapy to 74-75 CGE produced minimal treatment-related toxicity and excellent PSA normalization and disease-free survival in patients with low initial PSA levels. A prospective randomized dose-escalation trial is now underway to help define the optimum dose of radiation for patients with early stage prostate cancer.

[Practical determination of volume and doses in conformal radiotherapy]

The determination of the target volumes and the dose to be delivered are critical medical steps in order to locally control the disease and to limit the risks of normal tissues injury. While many clinical situations are compatible with standardised technique and beam arrangements, the tools provided by modern medical diagnostic imaging procedures and tridimensional dosimetry allow an improved conformation of the irradiated volume and the administered dose to the clinical target volume. However, this approach requires an increased precision in tumour and normal tissues delineation, based on patient immobilisation devices, standardisation of mobile organs repletion status and image acquisition procedures, explicit definition of the biological and physical safety margins, definition of acceptable levels of dose heterogeneity in the planning target volume and appropriate quality assurance procedures.

High-precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) of prostate cancer--a new technique for exact positioning of the prostate at the time of treatment

PURPOSE

Biopsies taken 2 years after radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer indicate residual tumor cells in 20-60% of cases, and the prognosis for these patients is unfavorable. More precise methods of localization of the prostate are desirable to increase the dose to the prostate tumor and minimize the volume of adjacent sensitive tissues that are currently included in the planning target volume. We have sought a method to more accurately locate the prostate at the time of treatment, allowing a reduction of the volume of rectum and bladder included in the high dose region during dose escalation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We have developed a new technique using a special urethral catheter (patent pending), containing markers that can be visualized by the radiotherapy machine for accurate positioning of the prostate. The catheter is used throughout the treatment planning procedure and the isocenter is placed on one of the markers. On the treatment couch the markers are visualized on port-films and with portal imaging immediately before dose delivery. A beam-center-marker on the accelerator makes it possible to adjust the isocenter position to within 1 mm, giving very high precision, independent of external fixation. The technique involves a simple patient setup. The method has been tested in five patients with conventional dose level (70 Gy) and in 24 patients in the first Scandinavian dose escalation study with external beam radiotherapy. No increase in acute side-effects was observed.

CONCLUSION

With the new high precision conformal radiotherapy (HPCRT) technique we have developed a technique that allows us to increase the dose to the prostate without excessive side effects. The method reduces the uncertainties in prostate localization, is easy to handle, and feasible in routine treatment.

Ten-year disease free survival after transperineal sonography-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy with or without 45-gray external beam irradiation in the treatment of patients with clinically localized, low to high Gleason grade prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors report observed 10-year brachytherapy results in the treatment of 152 consecutive patients with clinically organ-confined prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients with T1-T3, low to high Gleason grade, prostate carcinoma were treated between January 1987 and June 1988 at Northwest Hospital in Seattle, Washington. Their median age was 70 years (range, 53-92 years). Of these 152 patients, 98 (64%) received an iodine-125 implant alone (Group 1), and the remaining 54 patients (36%), who were judged to have a higher risk of extraprostatic extension, also were treated with 45 gray (Gy) of external beam irradiation to the pelvis (Group 2). No patient underwent lymph node sampling, and none received androgen ablation therapy. Multivariate regression and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Preoperative patient data with associated success or failure outcomes at 10 years after treatment were used for training and validating a back-propagation neural network prediction program.

RESULTS

The average preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) value, clinical stage, and Gleason grade were 11.0 ng/mL, T2, and 5, respectively. The median posttreatment follow-up was 119 months (range, 3-134 months). Overall survival 10 years after treatment was 65%. At last follow-up only 3 of the 152 patients (2%) had died of prostate carcinoma. Ninety-seven patients (64%) remained clinically and biochemically free of disease at 10 years of follow-up and had an average PSA value of 0.18 ng/mL (range, 0.01-0.5 ng/mL). In these patients a period of 42 months was required to reach the average PSA (0.5 ng/mL). The median to last PSA follow-up was 95 months (range, 3-134 months). Postoperative needle biopsies were negative in 56% of patients, positive in 15% of patients, and not available in 29% of patients. Only 6% of patients developed bone metastasis. At 10 years there was no statistically significant difference in treatment outcome between patients who received iodine-125 alone, and those who received iodine-125 with 45-Gy external beam irradiation (P = 0.08). Nevertheless, in these two groups preoperative PSA, stage, and Gleason grade were significantly different (P < 0.01). In the artificial neural network analysis, pretreatment serum PSA was the most accurate predictor of disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous prostate brachytherapy is a valid and efficient option for treating patients with clinically organ-confined, low to high Gleason grade, prostate carcinoma. Observed 10-year follow-up documents serum PSA levels superior to those reported in several published external beam irradiation series, and comparable to those published in a number of published radical prostatectomy series.

High-dose rate interstitial with external beam irradiation for localized prostate cancer--results of a prospective trial

PURPOSE

A prospective phase II trial was carried out to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a combined interstitial with external beam radiotherapy approach for localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 1992 and December 1994, 82 evaluable patients were treated. T2 and T3 tumours, according to the AJCC classification system of 1992, were found in 21 and 61 cases, respectively. The median follow-up was 24 months; three patients were lost during follow-up. All of the patients were pathologically proven to be node-negative by laparoscopic node dissection of the fossa obturatoria region. A dose of 9 Gy a week was prescribed during the first and second weeks of treatment (10 Gy each week from October 1992 to December 1993) interstitially with high-dose rate Iridium-192 brachytherapy to the prostate and tumour extension beyond the capsule. External beam four-field box irradiation was then given to the prostate to a dose of 45 Gy/25 fractions (40 Gy/20 fractions from October 1992 to December 1993).

RESULTS

Before starting treatment, a PSA value of > or =10 ng/ml was found in 64.6% (53/82) of patients with a median PSA of 14.0 ng/ml. The median PSA 3, 12 and 24 months after completion of therapy was 1.20, 0.78 and 0.70 ng/ml, respectively. The PSA value was < 1.0 ng/ ml in 52.9% of patients at 2 years. Negative punch biopsies 12 and 24 months after therapy were observed in 69.8% (44/63) and 73. 1% (38/ 52) of patients, respectively. A positive biopsy combined with a PSA value of > 1.0 ng/ml was considered as local failure. The local tumour control rate was 79.5% at 2 years. Acute side-effects were not increased relative to external beam irradiation alone. Severe side-effects were observed in three patients (two of the three patients had additional risk factors (colitis ulcerosa and diabetes mellitus)); they developed rectourethral fistulae requiring colostomy after biopsies from the anterior rectal wall.

CONCLUSION

The described method is feasible and well tolerable. The three complications observed were not caused by irradiation alone. Biopsies from the anterior rectal wall after definitive high-dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer have to be seen as obsolete. The rate of negative prostate biopsies of 73.1% after 24 months represents an encouraging result.

Fast neutrons in prostatic adenocarcinomas: worldwide clinical experience

Primary tumor control remains a major problem in the treatment of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Clinical local failure rates approach 30-40% and may be significantly higher when results of prostatic biopsy or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are considered. The low growth rate and cycling fraction of prostate adenocarcinoma suggest potential therapeutic advantage for the high linear energy transfer (LET) of neutrons. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) performed a multi-institutional randomized trial (RTOG 77-04) comparing mixed beam (neutron plus photon) irradiation to conventional photon irradiation for the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. A subsequent trial by the Neutron Therapy Collaborative Working Group (NTCWG 85-23) compared pure neutron irradiation to standard photon irradiation. Both randomized trials demonstrate significant improvement in locoregional control with neutron irradiation compared to conventional photon irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate carcinoma. To date, only the mixed beam trial has shown a significant survival benefit. Future analysis of the larger NTCWG trial at the 10-year point should confirm whether or not improved locoregional control translates into a survival advantage. These findings have significant implications for all local treatment strategies including dose-escalated conformal photon irradiation, prostate implantation, and neutron radiation. Given the large numbers of patients afflicted with this disease, a positive survival advantage for neutrons or mixed beam therapy would provide a strong incentive for the development of economically feasible clinical neutron facilities.

Daily CT localization for correcting portal errors in the treatment of prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Improved prostate localization techniques should allow the reduction of margins around the target to facilitate dose escalation in high-risk patients while minimizing the risk of normal tissue morbidity. A daily CT simulation technique is presented to assess setup variations in portal placement and organ motion for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six patients who consented to this study underwent supine position CT simulation with an alpha cradle cast, intravenous contrast, and urethrogram. Patients received 46 Gy to the initial Planning Treatment Volume (PTV1) in a four-field conformal technique that included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and lymph nodes as the Gross Tumor Volume (GTV1). The prostate or prostate and seminal vesicles (GTV2) then received 56 Gy to PTV2. All doses were delivered in 2-Gy fractions. After 5 weeks of treatment (50 Gy), a second CT simulation was performed. The alpha cradle was secured to a specially designed rigid sliding board. The prostate was contoured and a new isocenter was generated with appropriate surface markers. Prostate-only treatment portals for the final conedown (GTV3) were created with a 0.25-cm margin from the GTV to PTV. On each subsequent treatment day, the patient was placed in his cast on the sliding board for a repeat CT simulation. The daily isocenter was recalculated in the anterior/posterior (A/P) and lateral dimension and compared to the 50-Gy CT simulation isocenter. Couch and surface marker shifts were calculated to produce portal alignment. To maintain proper positioning, the patients were transferred to a stretcher while on the sliding board in the cast and transported to the treatment room where they were then transferred to the treatment couch. The patients were then treated to the corrected isocenter. Portal films and electronic portal images were obtained for each field.

RESULTS

Utilizing CT-CT image registration (fusion) of the daily and 50-Gy baseline CT scans, the isocenter changes were quantified to reflect the contribution of positional (surface marker shifts) error and absolute prostate motion relative to the bony pelvis. The maximum daily A/P shift was 7.3 mm. Motion was less than 5 mm in the remaining patients and the overall mean magnitude change was 2.9 mm. The overall variability was quantified by a pooled standard deviation of 1.7 mm. The maximum lateral shifts were less than 3 mm for all patients. With careful attention to patient positioning, maximal portal placement error was reduced to 3 mm.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, prostate motion after 50 Gy was significantly less than previously reported. This may reflect early physiologic changes due to radiation, which restrict prostate motion. This observation is being tested in a separate study. Intrapatient and overall population variance was minimal. With daily isocenter correction of setup and organ motion errors by CT imaging, PTV margins can be significantly reduced or eliminated. We believe this will facilitate further dose escalation in high-risk patients with minimal risk of increased morbidity. This technique may also be beneficial in low-risk patients by sparing more normal surrounding tissue.

Improvements in prostate radiotherapy from the customization of beam directions

A methodology for optimizing the beam directions in radiotherapy treatment planning has been developed and tested on a cohort of twelve prostate patients. An optimization algorithm employing a an objective cost function was used, based on beam's-eye-view volumetrics but also employing a simple dose model and biological considerations for organs-at-risk (OARs). The cost function embodies information about the volume of OARs in a single field and their position relative to the planning target volume (PTV). The proximity of the PTV to the surface of the patient is also included. Within the algorithm "importance factor" were used to model the clinical importance of different organs-at-risk so that all organs-at-risk were included in a single objective score. "Gantry-angle-windows" were introduced to restrict the available beam directions. The methodology was applied to twelve prostate patients to determine the optimum beam directions for three-field direction plans. Orientation-optimized and standard treatment plans were compared via measures of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). Standard plans had fixed beam directions whereas orientation-optimized plans contained beam directions chosen by the algorithm. The beam-weights of both the orientation-optimized and standard plans were optimized using a dose-based simulated annealing algorithm to allow the improvements by optimizing the beam directions to be studied in isolation. The results of the comparison show that optimization of the beam directions yielded better plans, in terms of TCP and NTCP, than the standard plans. When the dose to the isocenter was scaled to produce a rectal NTCP of 1%, the average TCP of the orientation-optimized plans was (5.7 +/- 1.4)% greater than that for the standard plans. In conclusion, the customization of beam directions in the treatment planning of prostate patients using and objective cost function and allowed gantry-angle-windows produces superior three-field direction plans compared to standard treatment plans.

Radical radiotherapy of localised prostate cancer: the relationship between radiation dose and survival

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aims to define the effects of different radiation dose levels on survival, local control and toxicity in a series of 208 patients with localised prostate cancer consecutively treated with radical radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1982 through 1996, 365 patients with prostate cancer have been consecutively treated with radical radiotherapy in Florence (n = 306) and Arezzo (n = 59). The 208 cases treated until January 1994 with Stage B (125/208, 60%) and C (83/208, 40%) are the objects of the present study. The treatment was most often limited to the prostatic area (81%), using a four-field "box technique" and 25 MV photon beams, up to a total dose of 60-65 Gy (21% of the patients), of 66-69 Gy (26%) and of 70 Gy (53%); conventional fractionation was used (fractional dose: 2 Gy; five fractions/week). Hormonal therapy was also given to 39% of the cases. The possible relationship between dose, stage, grading and survival has been analysed. The survival figures and the types of relapse observed (prostatic, lymphnodal or "biochemical") have been analysed also according to the extent of the target volume and to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at diagnosis, in the entire series or in selected subgroups.

RESULTS

In the whole series and also after radiation alone, the patients with Stage B, with more differentiated tumours and those treated with higher doses to the prostate obtained significantly better survival results. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the dose level has an independent prognostic value. The use of a limited target volume did not produce an excess of pelvic lymphnodal failures. Among the patients more recently treated with radiation alone, the PSA level at diagnosis is strongly related with the risk of local and "biochemical" failure, and also with the relapse-free survival. Toxicity was acceptable, also for the patients treated with higher doses, but late treatment-related damage is more frequent in patients treated on larger volumes.

CONCLUSION

The results of this retrospective analysis confirm the good results of small volume, high dose radiation therapy of prostatic cancer, even taking into account the possible biases due to the retrospective nature of the study, and the relevance of the PSA level at diagnosis to define the risk of local failure.

[Radiotherapy of stage T1-T2 M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Analysis of the carcinologic results of a multicenter study of 610 patients. Groupe Radiothérapie de la Commission de Coopération Médicale Intercentres (CCMI)]

PURPOSE

Retrospective analysis of the results of radiotherapy in localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Complications were excluded.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six-hundred-and-ten T1-T2 adenocarcinomas of the prostate were treated with continuous courses of external beam radiation therapy in 19 participating Institutes between January 1983 and January 1988. The mean follow-up was 10.4 years; the mean age of patients at the beginning of radiotherapy was 68.5 years.

RESULTS

A 10-year, local control had been achieved in 86% of T1-T2 (81.4% for T2). The 5- and 10-year metastatic relapse rates were 25.3% and 30% (29% and 38.1% for T2), respectively. At 10 years, 62.4% of T1-T2 were recurrence-free; overall survival rate was 45.8% and cause-specific survival rate was 70.5%; 29.9% of T1-T2 patients were alive and disease-free. T category (TNM), pathologic grade, pelvic lymph node status, local tumor control, and obstructive ureteral symptoms were correlated with survival. The influence of pelvic nodes radiation, dose, overall treatment time, previous endocrine treatment, and transuretral resection was not significant for disease-free survival (alive and disease-free) and other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between the French series (1975-1982 and 1983-1988). The results of the literature are comparable to ours. As far as prognostic factors are concerned, this report provides evidence that the explainable variables which influence survival depend on the tumor and patient status.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and dose escalation: where do we stand?

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is an effective means of delivering high doses of radiation with enhanced precision. Several institutions have gained substantial experience using this modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Reports from these centers have demonstrated not only excellent tolerance despite the administration of higher radiation doses, but improved biochemical and local control outcomes as well. Meticulous attention to treatment technique and dose volume histogram analysis are critical for the safe implementation of these higher doses. The emergence of intensity-modulated treatment planning has provided the opportunity at our institution to further escalate the radiation dose to 86.4 Gy while still respecting the surrounding normal tissue tolerance. Phase I studies will need to continue to define more clearly the maximal dose of radiation that can be delivered safely with this modality. Current studies indicate a direct correlation between dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival response for patients with intermediate and high-risk prognostic features. These patients likely represent the ideal cohort for future studies designed to investigate the impact of dose on biochemical and disease-free survival outcome.