Prostate-specific antigen and radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Re-examining the role of prostate-specific antigen density in predicting outcome for clinically localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prognostic significance of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in clinically localized prostate cancer and determine whether this index is independent of or superior to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in predicting outcome of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between January 1989 and December 1993, 175 evaluable patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received definitive radiotherapy using computed tomography (CT)-guided conformal techniques. PSAD was defined as the ratio of the pretreatment serum PSA to the prostate volume measured from CT treatment planning scans by one investigator. All PSA values were determined using the Hybritech assay. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive elevations in PSA separated by at least 3 months and a final PSA value greater than 1 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis including PSA and Gleason score revealed both to be statistically significant predictors of biochemical disease-free survival (P = 0.048 and P < 0.001, respectively). PSAD did not achieve significance on regression analysis. A direct multivariate analysis including PSA and PSAD required dichotomization in order to reduce high correlation. This analysis demonstrated a relative risk (RR) for failure of 1.27 (NS) for high PSA versus low PSA compared with a RR of 1.20 (NS) for high PSAD versus low PSAD. A regression model containing all three variables indicated only the Gleason score as significant in predicting biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not suggest that PSAD is either an independent prognostic factor or a stronger discriminant of outcome than PSA in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy. Larger patient numbers with longer follow-up data, use of a clinical end point, or an analysis restricted to the appropriate subgroup may demonstrate the utility of PSAD in the future.

Conformal external beam treatment of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the 5-year outcomes of treatment for patients with prostate cancer treated largely with conformal three-dimensional radiation therapy.

METHODS

Results are presented for 456 consecutive patients treated prior to December 31, 1993 whose pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are known. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive rises in the PSA that equals or exceeds 1.5 ng/mL. Kaplan-Meier product limit methods, the log-rank test, and Cox regression models were used in evaluating the data. No patient was lost to follow-up.

RESULTS

The 5-year biochemically free of failure (bNED) rate for all patients was 61% and 57% at 7 years. In the group with pretreatment PSA less than 10 ng/mL, the 5-year bNED rate for patients with localized disease (T1,2AB disease, Gleason sum of 6 or less) was 85% and for those with locally advanced disease (T2C,3), 70%. In the group with pretreatment PSA of 10 to 19.9 ng/mL, the 5-year bNED rate for patients with localized disease was 66% and for those with locally advanced disease, 44%. In the group with pretreatment PSA of 20 ng/mL or above, the patients with localized or locally advanced disease had 5-year bNED rates of 31% and 21%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of largely conformal three-dimensional external beam treatment of localized prostate cancer produced 5-year bNED results that are comparable to recent reports of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. Preliminary 7-year bNED results in all patients and in patients with localized tumors indicated a modest decrease in the cancer-free rate from that observed at 5 years, suggesting the results are durable.

Detection of circulating prostate carcinoma cells via an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with early stage prostate carcinoma. Independence from other pretreatment characteristics

BACKGROUND

Circulating prostate cells can be detected in the venous blood of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma by applying reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques using primers specific for the prostate specific antigen (PSA) gene. This study evaluates whether the detection of circulating cells correlates with established prognostic factors, treatment, and pathologic stage.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate had an RT-PCR assay performed as part of their staging evaluation. No treatment decisions were made on the basis of the RT-PCR results. Of these, 156 patients were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 71 with radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Forty-eight patients were treated with hormonal therapy prior to RP (n = 39) or EBRT (n = 9). The prognostic factors analyzed for their relationship to RT-PCR were clinical stage, pretreatment serum PSA levels, Gleason score of the biopsy specimen, and Gleason score of the surgical specimen. An analysis of the relationship between treatment and RT-PCR results was also performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of RT-PCR positivity was performed as well. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of pathologic stage, including RT-PCR, were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (26.9%) had a positive RT-PCR assay. There was no relationship between clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason score, or surgical Gleason score and RT-PCR positivity. In univariate analysis, patients treated with RP had a higher rate of RT-PCR positivity than patients treated with EBRT (P = 0.054). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis no factor, including treatment with RP, was a significant predictor of RT-PCR positivity. RT-PCR and pretreatment PSA predicted pathologic stage in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of circulating prostate cells using RT-PCR occurs in approximately 25% of early stage prostate carcinoma patients and is independent of other established prognostic factors. In addition, a positive RT-PCR assay is a strong predictor of pathologic upstaging in patients with clinically organ-confined disease.

Detection of circulating prostate carcinoma cells via an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with early stage prostate carcinoma. Independence from other pretreatment characteristics

BACKGROUND

Circulating prostate cells can be detected in the venous blood of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma by applying reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques using primers specific for the prostate specific antigen (PSA) gene. This study evaluates whether the detection of circulating cells correlates with established prognostic factors, treatment, and pathologic stage.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate had an RT-PCR assay performed as part of their staging evaluation. No treatment decisions were made on the basis of the RT-PCR results. Of these, 156 patients were treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and 71 with radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Forty-eight patients were treated with hormonal therapy prior to RP (n = 39) or EBRT (n = 9). The prognostic factors analyzed for their relationship to RT-PCR were clinical stage, pretreatment serum PSA levels, Gleason score of the biopsy specimen, and Gleason score of the surgical specimen. An analysis of the relationship between treatment and RT-PCR results was also performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of predictors of RT-PCR positivity was performed as well. In addition, univariate and multivariate analyses of predictors of pathologic stage, including RT-PCR, were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients (26.9%) had a positive RT-PCR assay. There was no relationship between clinical stage, pretreatment PSA, biopsy Gleason score, or surgical Gleason score and RT-PCR positivity. In univariate analysis, patients treated with RP had a higher rate of RT-PCR positivity than patients treated with EBRT (P = 0.054). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis no factor, including treatment with RP, was a significant predictor of RT-PCR positivity. RT-PCR and pretreatment PSA predicted pathologic stage in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of circulating prostate cells using RT-PCR occurs in approximately 25% of early stage prostate carcinoma patients and is independent of other established prognostic factors. In addition, a positive RT-PCR assay is a strong predictor of pathologic upstaging in patients with clinically organ-confined disease.

Early stage prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy: stratifying an intermediate risk group

PURPOSE

This study identifies two early prostate cancer populations within the T1/T2AB, Gleason 2-7, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4-15 ng/ml grouping. By demonstrating different outcomes we may be able to more appropriately select a subgroup for whom adjuvant therapy trials or altered treatment techniques are indicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-six patients with T1/T2AB, Gleason score 2-7, PSA 4-15 ng/ml prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy alone from November 1987 to October 1993. The median pretreatment PSA was 8.6 and the mean 8.7. Minimum follow-up was 2 years with a median of 38 months (mean 42 months, range 24-87). The median age was 70 years (range 58-83) and the median central axis dose delivered was 7240 cGy (mean 7273, range 6541-7895 cGy). Eleven patients received conventional radiotherapy while 135 were treated using conformal techniques. As there is evidence that a low PSA nadir is an early marker for long term biochemical control, time to post treatment PSA < 1 ng/ml was actuarially analyzed by Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, radiation dose, stage, and the presence of perineural invasion. Pretreatment PSA was the only patient characteristic predictive of achieving a PSA level < 1.0 ng/ml. Biochemical relapse free (bNED) control (non rising PSA) was then compared for patients above and below the approximate median pretreatment PSA level of 8 ng/ml. bNED control rates and the time to PSA < 1.0 ng/ml were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and differences in bNED control and PSA < 1.0 ng/ml according to PSA level were evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Results from actuarial analysis revealed that pretreatment PSA was the only significant variable predictive of a PSA < 1.0 ng/ml. Ninety-eight percent of patients with pretreatment PSA < 8 achieved a PSA level < 1.0 ng/ml within 3 years compared to 78% for patients with a PSA > 8 ng/ml (p = 0.0003). bNED control for the two groups separated at a pretreatment PSA of 8 ng/ml confirms a favorable outcome, 88% bNED control at 5 years for < 8 ng/ml and 74% for a pretreatment PSA > or = 8 ng/ml (p = 0.007 for overall curve comparison).

CONCLUSION

For early prostate cancer patients (T1/T2AB, Gleason 2-7, pretreatment PSA 4-15) there is a significant break in bNED control following external beam radiation at a pretreatment PSA level of 8 ng/ml. Patients with pretreatment PSA < 8 have a very favorable bNED response with radiation alone while those with a pretreatment PSA 8-15 have a significant decrease in bNED response. The 27% failure rate at 5 years in the PSA 8-15 ng/ml patients may justify altered treatment techniques or clinical trials of adjuvant androgen deprivation in this group.

An enhanced prognostic system for clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

This investigation was conducted to develop an enhanced prognostic system based on readily available and independently predictive tumor-related factors for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

The outcome of 500 patients treated solely with irradiation for clinical TNM classifications T1-4, NO or NX, MO prostate carcinoma was used to identify factors independently associated with disease relapse. Logistic regression constructed a risk score equation, and optimized cutoff points to characterize patient groups with low, intermediate, or high risks for relapse were established with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Clinical tumor stage (P < 0.00001), Gleason score (P = 0.0002), and pretherapy serum prostate specific antigen (P < 0.00001) were independently associated with clinical or biochemical relapse. These factors were included in a risk score equation that defined patient groups with a distinctly different outcome. For the low, intermediate, and high risk groups, the relapse-free probabilities at 5 years after irradiation were 92%, 67%, and 24%, respectively (P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Readily available, pretherapy disease-related characteristics formed the basis of an enhanced prognostic system for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. A multivariate prognostic system of this nature estimated patient prognosis in a more exacting fashion than a system exclusively based on anatomic factors.

Prostate-specific antigen cancer volume: a significant prognostic factor in prostate cancer patients at intermediate risk of failing radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Although the pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen level (PSAL) is the single-most significant predictor of local and biochemical control in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, it is relatively insensitive for patients with a PSAL in the intermediate range (4-20 ng/ml). PSA density (PSAD) has been shown to be slightly more predictive of outcome than PSAL for this intermediate risk group; however, this improvement is small and of little use clinically. PSA cancer volume (PSACV), an estimate of cancer volume based on PSA, has recently been described and has been purported to be more significant than PSAL in predicting early biochemical failure after radiotherapy. We report a detailed comparison between this new prognostic factor, PSAL, and PSAD.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 356 patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy for regionally localized (T1-4,Nx,M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate were reviewed. Each patient had a PSAL, biopsy Gleason score, and pretreatment prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography. The median PSAL was 9.3 ng/ml and 66% had Gleason scores in the 2-6 range. The median radiation dose was 66.0 Gy and the median follow-up for those living was 27 months. PSACV was calculated using a formula which takes into account PSAL, pretreatment prostate ultrasound volume, and Gleason score. The median PSACV was 1.43 cc. Biochemical failure was defined as increases in two consecutive follow-up PSA levels, one increase by a factor > 1.5, or an absolute increase of > 1 ng/ml. Local failure was defined as a cancer-positive prostate biopsy, obtained for evidence of tumor progression.

RESULTS

The distributions of PSACV and PSAL were similar and, when normalized by log transformation, were highly correlated (p < 0.0001, linear regression). There was a statistically significant relationship between PSACV and several potential prognostic factors including PSAL, PSAD, stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). In univariate analyses, PSACV, PSAL, and PSAD proved to be the most significant predictors of both biochemical and local control. In multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards models with PSAL, PSAD, PSACV, and PAP as continuous variables, PSAL, PSACV, and Gleason score were significant in predicting biochemical control. Only PSAL was significantly correlated with local control. However, when these analyses were restricted to patients with intermediate PSALs (4-20 ng/ml), only PSACV was significant for predicting both biochemical and local control.

CONCLUSION

PSACV was highly correlated with actuarial local and biochemical control and was superior to both PSAL and PSAD in predicting these outcomes in patients with PSALs between 4 and 20 ng/ml.

Assessment of endpoints for clinical trials for localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

The AUA Practice Guidelines Panel convened to address the issue of appropriate endpoints for assessment of treatment modalities for localized carcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS

A review of the literature and the design of existing clinical trials produced a consensus, which was presented to and critiqued by the members of the general conference.

RESULTS

The pitfalls associated with identification of local failure endpoints were discussed, and the more accurate endpoints of freedom from metastatic progression and overall survival were recognized. The strict definition that must be fulfilled for intermediate endpoints to become surrogates for metastasis free and/or survival endpoints was stressed. For more efficient and rapid conduct of future clinical trials, the urgent need to validate such surrogate endpoints by evaluation in randomized control trials is obvious. PSA, while an indicator of disease activity and a critical marker for estimating disease progression or regression in response to therapy, is not a surrogate for metastasis free or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Until surrogate endpoints are validated, the committee has evaluated the endpoints in current use, reviewed their limitations, and stressed the importance of quality-of-life assessment together with the traditional endpoint assessment.

Combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1987 to 1994, 30 patients received combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced prostate cancer. The results of the 21 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 18) or locally recurrent (n = 3) adenocarcinoma are reported herein. No patient had evidence of distant metastases. Total radiotherapy doses of 65-70 Gy to the prostate were planned using a four-field box technique. Hyperthermia treatments were delivered using an annular phased array microwave device. The treatment goal was to achieve temperatures > or = 42 degrees C in all measured points within the prostate.

RESULTS

Of the newly diagnosed patients, 16 out of 18 (89%) had T3 or T4 tumors, 11 out of 18 (61%) had Gleason scores of 7-9, and the mean pretreatment Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 69 ng/ml. The median follow-up of all 21 patients was 36 months. None of the patients achieved the treatment goal of all intratumoral temperatures > or = 42 degrees C. The mean CEM 43 T90 was 2.34 min. The disease-free survival at 36 months is 25%; 12 out of 18 (67%) of the patients have relapsed. The only significant predictor of relapse was pretreatment PSA. There were no complications > Grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the inability to achieve high tumor temperatures, the relapse-free survival rate in this population of patients with very advanced localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy plus hyperthermia compares favorably with most series using radiation therapy alone. Further studies aimed at improving the ability to deliver hyperthermia to the prostate are warranted.

Serum testosterone--a significant determinant of metastatic relapse for irradiated localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the serum total testosterone concentration correlates with the outcome for men irradiated for clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

The outcome-local, nodal, distant metastatic, and biochemical--for 486 men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by radiation and for whom testosterone levels were available was analyzed. No patient received adjuvant androgen ablation. Patient tumor stages were T1: 129 (27%); T2: 187 (38%); and T3/T4: 170 (35%). Median follow-up was 41 months.

RESULTS

Pretreatment testosterone values ranged from 109 to 1121 ng/dL, with a mean of 417 ng/dL and a median of 398 ng/dL. The distribution of patients according to a four-tier testosterone grouping was testosterone level of 300 ng/dL or less, 108 (22%); testosterone level greater than 300 ng/dL but not more than 400 ng/dL, 141 (29%); testosterone level greater than 400 ng/dL but not more than 500 ng/dL, 123 (25%); and testosterone level greater than 500 ng/dL, 114 (23%). There were statistically significant but trivial correlations between testosterone level and age, T-stage, and acid phosphatase level. There was no correlation between testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. There was a highly significant correlation between testosterone level and metastatic relapse. Patients with testosterone level greater than 500 ng/dL had a markedly higher 6-year metastatic rate (16%) than those with a testosterone level of 500 ng/dL or less (4%) (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, testosterone level was an independent determinant of metastatic relapse, second only to PSA level and of about the same power as T-stage. Gleason grade, although significant, was less so than testosterone level. The correlation of testosterone level to outcome appeared to be specific for metastatic relapse having no relation to local outcome. Likewise, high testosterone levels were not associated with acceleration of postradiation serum PSA kinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a highly significant correlation between pretreatment testosterone level and metastatic relapse in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiation. As serum testosterone increases, so too does metastatic relapse. This relationship appears to take a decided turn for the worse at testosterone levels exceeding 500 ng/dL.

Biochemical disease-free survival following 125I prostate implantation

PURPOSE

To assess the 5-year clinical and biochemical results of ultrasound-guided permanent 125I brachytherapy in early adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) is reported, using PSA follow-up and is compared to the surgical and radiation therapy literature.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From December 1988 through December 1993, ultrasound-guided brachytherapy was preplanned with 125I and delivered 160 Gy as the sole treatment in 499 patients. All were clinically staged as T1 or T2 node-negative adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Within the first year, 10 patients were lost to follow-up and have been excluded from further study. The remaining 489 patients form the basis of this report. Clinical status and prostate specific antigen (PSA) values were systematically recorded before and after treatment.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 35 months (3-70), the actuarial clinical local control is 83%. Both stage and grade are shown to predict for this endpoint. Actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) is also correlated with stage, grade, and PSA at presentation. Biochemical disease-free survival at 5 years is 94% for T1, 70% for unilateral T2, and 34% for T2c tumors. Grade is also predictive, ranging from 85% in low-grade tumors to 30% in high-grade tumors. In a multivariate analysis, the pretreatment PSA is most highly correlated (p < 0.0001) with BDFS, local control, and clinical disease-free survival. Patients with a normal pretreatment PSA enjoyed 93% BDFS, while those presenting with PSA > 10 had a BDFS of 40%. Complications have been few, with severe urinary urgency or dysuria in 4% and both incontinence and proctitis seen in 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

While biochemical disease-free survival reports in the literature are immature and have short follow-up, our data compares favorably with studies following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. Further follow-up of this cohort is required. The complication rate is low and patient acceptance excellent. Permanent implantation of 125I as the sole treatment for early prostate adenocarcinoma is a viable alternative for patients with early-stage and low- to moderate-grade cancers. The PSA provides significant prognostic information and aids in case selection. Better management options are needed for high grade and bilateral tumors.

[The conformal radiotherapy of localized prostatic carcinoma: acute tolerance and early efficacy]

AIM

In a prospective trial early effectiveness and acute toxicity of conformal 3D-planned radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer was quantified using dose-volume-histogramms and evaluated with respect of treatment technique.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Thirty-two men (44 to 80 years old) with locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate (stage B2 or C) have been treated by 3D-planned conformal radiotherapy using high energy photons. In 28/32 men treatment technique was a monoaxial bisegmental rotation with irregular fields. With single doses of 2.0 Gy a mean total dose of 63.9 +/- 4.9 Gy according to ICRU was applied within 46 +/- 4 days. Maximum dose was in the mean 105.1% +/- 3.8%. 3D treatment volume was 274.1 +/- 113.4 cm3. Median follow-up is 1.8 years (15 to 34 months). Toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG-EORTC by patient interview and physical examination on a weekly basis during radiotherapy and by regular follow-up.

RESULTS

Eleven patients had none, 15 mild (RTOG grade 1) and 6 moderate symptoms (RTOG grade 2, mainly diarrhoea, dysuria and polyuria). Acute complications leading to treatment interruption did not occur. In 16 patients symptoms disappeared within 6 weeks after radiotherapy. Only 2 men had symptoms which lasted longer than 3 months and were endoscopically examined. Up to now no late complications were detected. Incidence and severity of toxicity was significantly (p < 0.05) related to the size of treatment volume. Acute toxicity was found to depend statistically significant (p < 0.05) on the proportional volume of bladder and rectum, irradiated with more than 35 Gy. In 81% of the patients with pretherapeutic elevated PSA levels normalisation of PSA was observed. Overall mean PSA levels of 15.7 +/- 22.6 micrograms/l at the beginning of radiotherapy fell to 2.1 +/- 3.7 micrograms/l 6 weeks after irradiation. Only 1 Patient relapsed locally 22 months after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that due to modern 3D-planned conformal techniques with optimization of treatment dose and improved protection of critical organs such as urinary bladder and rectum, radiotherapy allows an effective and well tolerated therapy of localized prostatic carcinoma.

A multiple prognostic index predictive of disease outcome after irradiation for clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This investigation was conducted to identify independent pretherapy disease-related factors associated with disease outcome in patients with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate (CaP) and to develop models that incorporated relevant covariates for estimating the risk of disease relapse after irradiation (RT).

METHODS

The outcome of 500 patients treated only with RT between March 1987 and June 1993 for clinical Stages T1-4N0,XM0 CaP was evaluated. The risk of disease relapse as a function of individual prognostic variables, and combinations thereof, was determined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 4-103 months), 69 patients (14%) had clinical evidence of local recurrence (27 patients), regional lymph node relapse (4 patients), or metastatic relapse (38 patients) within 5 years of RT. Forty additional patients (8%) had biochemical relapse based solely on the post-RT serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) profile. Clinical tumor stage (P = 0.0006), Gleason score (P = 0.001) of the diagnostic biopsy specimen, and pretherapy PSA (P < 0.0001) were associated with disease relapse. The risk of any relapse within 5 years of RT was determined and graphically displayed as risk estimate plots for combinations of these pretherapy prognostic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pretherapy clinical tumor (T) stage, Gleason score, and PSA level can be used to obtain improved estimates of the risk for disease relapse in patients treated solely with RT for clinically localized CaP. Risk estimate plots of this type may facilitate exchange of therapeutic outcome information, be instrumental in pretherapy decision-making for the new patient with this condition, and aid in the selection of patients for future studies.

Radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma. The correlation of pretreatment prostate specific antigen and nadir prostate specific antigen with outcome as assessed by systematic biopsy and serum prostate specific antigen

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to correlate the failure pattern of localized prostate carcinoma after radiotherapy (RT) with pretreatment (preTx) PSA and post-RT nadir PSA, using systematic biopsies and serum PSA in the assessment of outcome.

METHODS

From January 1990 to February 1994, 207 patients treated with external beam RT were followed prospectively with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies and measurements of serum PSA levels. Three hundred forty-three biopsies were performed, with 4-7 samples taken per session. The distribution of T classification was as follows: 19 patients had T1b, 15 had T1c, 34 had T2a, 79 had T2b/c, 53 had T3, and 7 had T4. Median follow-up was 36 months (range, 12-70 months). Failures were categorized as biochemical (chemF) (PSA > 2.0 ng/mL and > 1 ng/ mL over nadir), local (LF) (positive biopsy and PSA > 2), and distant (DF). The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (MVA).

RESULTS

Overall, failures were seen in 68 of 207 patients: 20 LF, 24 DF, 7 LF + DF, and 17 chemF. In univariate analysis, failures correlated significantly with preTx PSA, post-RT nadir PSA, T classification, and Gleason's score (GS). The total failure rate was 12% for T1b, T1c, and T2a; 39% for T2b and T2c; and 60% for T3 and T4 (P < 0.0001). By evaluation with preTx PSA, at 36 months the total failure rate was 3% for preTx PSA < or = 5 ng/mL 16% for 5.1-10 ng/mL, 32% for 10.1-15 ng/mL, 42% for 15.1-20 ng/mL, 63% for 20.1-50 ng/mL, and 88% for > 50 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). By evaluation with post-RT nadir PSA, at 36 months the total failure rate was 4% for nadir PSA < or = 0.5 ng/ mL, 26% for 0.6-1 ng/mL, 33% for 1.1-2 ng/mL, and 92% for > 2 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). In MVA, nadir PSA (P < 0.0001) and T classification (P < 0.0005) were independent predictors for any failure. LF occurred in 13% of patients (27 of 207). For these 27 patients, the categorization of T classification was: T1b/T1c/T2a, 7%; T2b/T2c, 16%; and T3/T4, 15% (P = not significant). In MVA, only nadir PSA (P = 0.0004) predicted for LF. DF occurred in 15% of patients (31 of 207). In MVA, nadir PSA (P < 0.0001) and T classification (P < 0.0001) predicted for DF, with pretreatment PSA of borderline significance (P < 0.05). To assess preTx predictors of outcome, post-RT nadir PSA was removed from the model. PreTx PSA then became the dominant variable to predict any failure (P < 0.0001), LF (P = 0.05), chemF (P = 0.0001), and DF (P < 0.003), while T classification also predicted for any failure (P = 0.03), chemF (P = 0.05), and DF (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic prostate biopsies, performed as part of the rigorous followup of prostate carcinoma after RT, define the patterns of failure and confirm the prognostic value of preTx PSA, post-RT nadir PSA, and T classification. Prior to treatment, preTx PSA is the overwhelming independent predictor of failure, but it is surpassed by post-RT nadir PSA when this is added to the model.

Irradiation for locally recurrent carcinoma of the prostate following radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with irradiation (RT) for isolated, clinically apparent local tumor recurrence following prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate (CaP).

METHODS

Between May 1979 and July 1992, 35 patients received external-beam RT as sole salvage therapy for post-prostatectomy locally recurrent CaP. Patient outcome was evaluated through retrospective medical record review with respect to clinical and prostate-specific antigen-based (that is, biochemical) control rates, as well as disease-free (clinical and biochemical) and overall survival estimates. Chronic RT-induced morbidity was also examined, and pre-RT disease characteristics were evaluated for their association with disease outcome.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 1.7 to 12.1) in survivors (30 patients), 19 patients (54%) had clinical (local, 1 patient [3%]; metastatic, 7 patients [20%]) or biochemical only (11 patients [31%]) relapse. The 8-year clinical relapse-free and any relapse-free (clinical or biochemical) rates were 80% and 56%, respectively, whereas the overall survival estimate was 97%. A chronic complication(s) of treatment was noted in 15 patients (43%) but spontaneously resolved in all but 6 (17%); persistent complications were mild and associated with rectal (grade 1 to 2, 14%) and lymphatic (3%) systems. The interval between prostatectomy and local tumor recurrence, the pre-RT prostate-specific antigen serum level, the pathologic stage, and tumor differentiation may be associated with disease outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

External-beam RT resulted in excellent local tumor control without serious long-term morbidity in most patients. Although this study could not define an optimal management strategy (for example, symptomatic measures only, RT, or hormonal therapy), these results provided outcome measures, in relationship to pre-RT tumor-related factors, that may be valuable for clinical decision-making.

[Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Apropos of a series of 73 patients in Lyons (France)]

PURPOSE

Descriptive analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 1993, 73 patients (median age, 64.5 years; Gleason score > or = 7 : 36 pts; T1:22; T2:40; T3:11) were included into the study. On the operative specimen, the cancer grades were pT2:5 (involvement of the apex), pT3:67, pT4:1, pN1-2:8. Radiation therapy was performed after a mean resting period of 112 days. The target volume was the prostatic area. The technique used was a four-field box with an 18 MV-X photon beam. The dose was 50 Gy/20 fractions/5 weeks. No hormonal treatment was administered, except for 5 patients for a short duration.

RESULTS

The median follow up was 46 months. One anastomotic local failure was salvaged by trans-urethral resection, three distant metastatic failures. Out of 72 patients with a PSA < 3 ng/mL at the end of radiotherapy, 13 showed an isolated elevation. The 5-year overall survival rate was 93%. The event-free survival was 72% after 5 years. Pathological differentiation and Gleason score were significantly correlated with the survival. There was no complication related to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Elective adjuvant radiation therapy for pT3 prostate adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy provides a good local control with minimal morbidity.

External beam radiation therapy does not offer long-term control of prostate cancer

In the absence of large, contemporary, randomized series comparing external beam radiation and radical prostatectomy, definitive conclusions regarding relative efficacy are difficult to establish. This article examines series in which an objective, comparable end point was used and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was assessed. With follow-up of less than 5 years, PSA-based recurrence rates are similar for external beam radiation and radical surgery; however, the 10- and 15-year control rates are significantly lower in the population of patients treated with external beam radiation. The authors conclude that external beam radiation therapy as a single modality does not equal radical prostatectomy in comparably staged and followed patients.

Assessing the variability of outcome for patients treated with localized prostate irradiation using different definitions of biochemical control

PURPOSE

Biochemical control using serial posttreatment serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is being increasingly used to assess treatment efficacy for localized prostate cancer. However, no standardized definition of biochemical control has been established. We reviewed our experience treating patients with localized prostate cancer and applied three different commonly used definitions of biochemical control to determine if differences in therapeutic outcome would be observed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between January 1987 and December 1991, 480 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital. The median dose to the prostate was 66.6 Gy (range 58-70.4) using a four-field or arc technique. Pretreatment and posttreatment serum PSA levels were recorded. Over 86% (414 of 480) of patients had a pretreatment PSA level available. Three different definitions of biochemical control were used: (a) PSA nadir < 1 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (b) PSA nadir < 1.5 ng/ml within 1 year of treatment completion. After achieving nadir, if two consecutive increases of PSA were noted, the patient was scored a failure at the time of the first increase; (c) Posttreatment PSA nadir < 4 ng/ml without a time limit. Once the nadir was achieved, if it did not rise above normal the patient was considered to be biochemically controlled. Clinical local control was defined as no palpable prostate nodularity beyond 18 months, no new prostate nodularity, or a negative prostate biopsy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 48 months (range 3-112). Pretreatment PSA values were correlated with treatment outcome using the three definitions of biochemical control as well as clinical local control. Pretreatment PSA values were stratified into five groups (Group 1: PSA < 4; Group 2: PSA 4-10; Group 3: PSA 10-15; Group 4: PSA 15-20; and Group 5: PSA > 20), and 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were calculated using the three biochemical control and one clinical local control definitions. For Group 1, 5-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were 84%, 90%, 91%, and 96% for Definitions 1-3 and clinical local control, respectively. For Group 2, 5-year actuarial control rates were 45%, 54%, 74%, and 92% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 3, 5-year actuarial control rates were 26%, 31%, 63%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. For Group 4, 5-year actuarial control rates were 24%, 24%, 50%, and 100% for the four definitions, respectively. Finally, for Group 5, 5-year actuarial control rates were 5%, 14%, 15%, and 89% for the four definitions, respectively. Depending on the definition used, statistically significant differences overall in outcome rates were observed. Differences between all four definitions for all pairwise comparisons ranged from 5 to 53% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

When different definitions of biochemical control are used in assessing treatment outcome, significantly different rates of success are noted. Until a standardized definition of biochemical control is adopted, differences in treatment outcome cannot be meaningfully compared.

Screening for prostate cancer using serum prostate-specific antigen: a randomised, population-based pilot study in Finland

The possibility of screening the general population for prostate cancer using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (alone or in combination with other tests) as screening test has recently been discussed. A number of studies are on the way, but the published reports have almost exclusively been based on men volunteering for screening. We assessed the feasibility of a screening study based on men identified from a central population registry. A random sample of 600 men in the age groups 55, 60 and 65 years was identified from the Finnish Population Registry as the study population. Half of them were randomised to the intervention group and an invitation to participate was sent to them. The participation rate was 77% (230 out of 300). Twenty-five men had a serum PSA concentration of 4.0 micrograms l-1 or above and were invited for further examination including digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and transrectal Tru-cut biopsies (directed and/or random). Six cases of cancer were detected among the 230 participating men, which corresponds to a detection rate of 2.6% and a positive predictive value of 24%. The number of cases detected is equivalent to the expected number of prostate cancer cases during a 10 year follow-up in this population. The ratio of free to total PSA was also measured and a cut-off level of 0.20 was chosen. Its use as an additional criterion of the screening test would have decreased the prevalence of false-positive screening tests from 8% (19 of 230) to 3% (7 of 230) at a cost of missing one of the six cancers compared with serum total PSA concentration alone. Of the six cancers, five were clinically regarded as localised and locally confined disease was confirmed pathologically in four of them. In conclusion, a population-based study in Finland seems feasible and the properties of the PSA test can be regarded as suitable for a randomised screening study. Thus, all prerequisites for a multicentre study, which is planned, seem to exist.

Use of PSA nadir to predict subsequent biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy for T1-2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

This study assessed the ability of nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to act as an early surrogate for subsequent freedom from biochemical failure following radiation therapy for T1-2 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the biochemical outcome of 314 consecutive men with T1-2 disease treated by conventional external beam radiation at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Minimum follow up was 2 years, and failure was defined as three successive rises in serum PSA of greater than 10%. Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of outcome was employed.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year freedom from biochemical progression was 63%. For those who achieved a PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 ng/ml (n = 123) it was 90%, for 0.6-1.0 ng/ml (n = 103) it was 55%, and for > 1.0 ng/ml (n = 88) it was 34%. Multivariate analysis showed an undetectable PSA nadir to be independent of Gleason grade and initial PSA in predicting subsequent outcome (P < 0.05). The likelihood of achieving an undetectable PSA nadir correlated strongly with the pretreatment value: 74% if this was below 4 ng/ml; 42% for those between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml; and 32% for those above 10 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

A PSA nadir of < or = 0.5 ng/ml represents an early endpoint strongly predictive of a favorable outcome following radiation therapy which may be used for the rapid assessment of new radiation strategies.

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Prostate specific antigen density as a prognostic factor for patients with prostate carcinoma treated with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen level (PSAL) is the most significant predictor of biochemical and local failure in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy. The role of prostate specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD) relative to PSAL for such patients is controversial. In this article, we describe a comparative analysis of the prognostic value of PSAL and PSAD.

METHODS

The study was comprised of 365 patients who were treated with external beam radiotherapy for regionally localized (T1-T4, Nx, M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate between 1987-1993 and in whom PSAL and pretreatment prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound were available. The mean and median doses were 66.8 Gy and 66 Gy. Median follow-up for those patients living was 27 months. The mean PSAL was 12.7 ng/mL with a median of 9.1 ng/mL. PSAD was calculated by dividing the PSAL by the pretreatment prostate transectal ultrasound volume (in cc). The mean PSAD was 0.44 and the median was 0.31. Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive increases in follow-up PSAs, one increase by a factor of greater than 1.5 of an absolute increase of greater than 1 ng/mL.

RESULTS

The distributions of PSAD and PSAL were similar and were positively skewed. When log-transformed, the distributions of both parameters were normalized and linear regression revealed a high correlation (P < 0.0001). PSAD was significantly associated with several potential prognostic factors, including stage, Gleason score, PSAL, and pretreatment prostatic acid phosphatase. Univariate analyses of PSAD and PSAL revealed that these were the most significant correlates of local and biochemical control. By contrast, stage and Gleason score were the only factors predictive of freedom from distant metastasis. Multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards models were then performed to determine if PSAD provided prognostic information independent of PSAL. The manner in which PSAD and PSAL were categorized (four, three, of two groups) dramatically influenced the significance of these covariates. Optimization of these groups for significance showed grouped PSAD to be the stronger predictor of the local control and grouped PSAL to be the stronger predictor of biochemical control. However, when PSAD and PSAL were used as continuous variables, PSAL was the only independently significant prognostic factor for local or biochemical control.

CONCLUSIONS

PSAD was highly correlated with actuarial patient outcome in the univariate analyses and appeared to provide independent information when PSAL was between 4 and 20 ng/mL. However, the differences based on PSAD were relatively small and, therefore, not clinically useful.

Conventional vs. conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results of dosimetry and acute toxicity

PURPOSE

To compare conformal radiotherapy using three dimensional treatment planning (3D-CRT) to conventional radiotherapy (Conven-RT) for patients with Stages T2-T4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Phase III randomized study was activated in May 1993, to compare treatment toxicity and patient outcome after 78 Gy in 39 fractions using 3D-CRT to that after 70 Gy in 35 fractions using Conven-RT. The first 46 Gy were administered using the same nonconformal field arrangement (four field) in both arms. The boost was given nonconformally using four fields in the Conven-RT arm and conformally using six fields in the 3D-CRT arm. The dose was specific to the isocenter. The first 60 patients, 29 in the 3D-CRT arm and 31 in the Conven-RT arm, are the subject of this preliminary analysis.

RESULTS

The two treatment arms were first compared in terms of dosimetry by dose-volume histogram analysis. Using a subgroup of patients in the 3D-CRT arm (n=15), both Conven-RT and 3D-CRT plans were generated and the dose-volume histogram data compared. The mean volumes treated to doses above 60 Gy for the bladder and rectum were 28 and 36% for the 3D-CRT plans, and 43 and 38% for the Conven-RT plans, respectively (p < 0.05 for the bladder volumes). The mean clinical target volume (prostate and seminal vesicles) treated to 95% of the prescribed dose was 97.5% for the 3D-CRT arm, and 95.6% for the Conven-RT arm (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the acute reactions between the two arms, with the majority experiencing Grade 2 or less toxicity (92%). Moreover, no relationship was seen between acute toxicity and the volume of bladder and rectum receiving in excess of 60 Gy for those in the 3D-CRT arm. There was also no difference between the groups in terms of early biochemical response. Prostate-specific antigen levels at 3 and 6 months after completion of radiotherapy were similar in the two treatment arms. There was only one biochemical failure in the study population at the time of the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the Conven-RT and 3D-RT treatment plans revealed that significantly less bladder was in the high dose volume in the 3D-CRT plans, while the volume of rectum receiving doses over 60 Gy was equivalent. There were no differences between the two treatment arms in terms of acute toxicity or early biochemical response. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of 3D-CRT on long-term patient outcome and late reactions.