Tooth extraction in patients receiving oral or intravenous bisphosphonate administration: A trigger for BRONJ development?

National Survey on Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws in Japan

PURPOSE

From 2011 to 2013, a nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted by the Japanese Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and the Japanese Society of Dentistry for Medically Compromised Patients to assess the development of bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) and to elucidate the outcomes and factors associated with remission.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A written questionnaire, including clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with BRONJ, was sent to 501 institutions.

RESULTS

This large-scale study included 4,797 cases with a female preponderance. BRONJ occurred twice as often in the mandible as in the maxilla. Most patients had BRONJ stage 2 (61.4%), followed by stage 1 (20.7%) and stage 3 (16.8%); stage 0 was excluded. The most common primary disease was malignant neoplasm (46.5%), followed by osteoporosis (including prevention; 45.3%). The proportion of patients on oral BPs increased, with the incidence approaching that of patients receiving parenteral BP. Surgical therapy rates of patients with BRONJ stages 1, 2, and 3 were 14.0, 37.6, and 53.5%, respectively. Outcome assessment for 936 patients with BRONJ stage 2 who underwent surgical therapy indicated remission in 46.3% of cases, improvement in 30.6%, disease progression in 5.4%, and no change in 6.1%. Good prognosis (remission or improvement) was seen in 76.9% of cases and poor prognosis (disease progression or no change) was seen in 11.5%. Analysis showed that risk factors for onset of BRONJ (P = .031), surgical procedure (P < .024), condition of the wound (P = .017), and discontinuation of BP (P < .001) were factors affecting prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The number of patients with BRONJ has increased in Japan. Attention to oral BP and proper treatment is required to minimize the number of cases. Surgical therapy seems to be effective for BRONJ stage 2.

Host defense against oral microbiota by bone-damaging T cells

The immune system evolved to efficiently eradicate invading bacteria and terminate inflammation through balancing inflammatory and regulatory T-cell responses. In autoimmune arthritis, pathogenic T_H17 cells induce bone destruction and autoimmune inflammation. However, whether a beneficial function of T-cell-induced bone damage exists is unclear. Here, we show that bone-damaging T cells have a critical function in the eradication of bacteria in a mouse model of periodontitis, which is the most common infectious disease. Bacterial invasion leads to the generation of specialized T_H17 cells that protect against bacteria by evoking mucosal immune responses as well as inducing bone damage, the latter of which also inhibits infection by removing the tooth. Thus, bone-damaging T cells, which may have developed to stop local infection by inducing tooth loss, function as a double-edged sword by protecting against pathogens while also inducing skeletal tissue degradation.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients who receive Bone Targeting Agents (BTAs): the power of e-learning

The definition, pathobiology and risk factors of ONJ in cancer patients who receive BTAs are discussed in the recent ecancer module for osteonecrosis of the jaw (http://ecancer.org/education/module/276-osteonecrosis-of-the-jaw.php). ONJ prevention, early diagnosis and management are presented. The critical question of the performance of dental extraction, during BTA therapy, as indicated with the recent studies, is supported. The importance of the collaboration between dental and oncology professionals and the patients is highlighted and can be achieved through appropriate education. The ecancer modules are valuable tools for successful e-learning in medical oncology education, including ONJ.

A multicenter case registry study on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose

This observational case registry study was designed to describe the natural history of cancer patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and evaluate the ONJ resolution rate.

Methods

Adults with a diagnosis of cancer and with a new diagnosis of ONJ were enrolled and evaluated by a dental specialist at baseline and every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years until death, consent withdrawal, or loss to follow-up. The primary endpoint was the rate and time course of ONJ resolution. Secondary endpoints included frequency of incident ONJ risk factors, ONJ treatment patterns, and treatment patterns of antiresorptive agents for subsequent ONJ.

Results

Overall, 327 patients were enrolled; 207 (63%) were continuing on study at data cutoff. Up to 69% of evaluable patients with ONJ had resolution or improvement during the study. ONJ resolution (AAOMS ONJ staging criteria) was observed in 114 patients (35%); median (interquartile range) time from ONJ onset to resolution was 7.3 (4.5–11.4) months. Most patients (97%) had received antiresorptive medication before ONJ development, 9 patients (3%) had not; 68% had received zoledronic acid, 38% had received denosumab, and 10% had received pamidronate (56% had received bisphosphonates only, 18% had received denosumab only, and 21% had exposure to both).

Conclusions

These results are consistent with those observed in clinical trials evaluating skeletal-related events in patients with advanced malignancy involving bone. Longer follow-up will provide further information on ONJ recurrence and resolution rates between medically and surgically managed patients.

Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with targeted therapy as monotherapy and in combination with antiresorptives. A report of 7 cases from the Copenhagen Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report cases of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) associated with targeted therapy (TT) with or without concomitant antiresorptive treatment, among the Copenhagen ONJ cohort, which includes all consecutive cases of MRONJ seen in Copenhagen.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively studied the treatment of 204 consecutive patients with MRONJ, seen between January 2010 and May 2016, to identify those associated with TT.

RESULTS

We detected 7 cases of MRONJ associated with TT (3.4%). Four patients received TT only, whereas 3 were concomitantly treated with bisphosphonates (n = 3) and/or denosumab (n = 3). The TT regimens included sunitinib (Sutent) (n = 1), everolimus (Afinitor) (n = 1), erlotinib (Tarceva) (n = 1), bevacizumab (Avastin) (n = 3), dasatinib (Sprycel) (n = 1) and imatinib (Glivec) (n = 1). The MRONJ stage included stages 1 and 2, and mean score on the visual analogue scale for pain in the jaw was 4.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care providers should be aware of the possibility of MRONJ associated with the TT agents sunitinib, everolimus, and dasatinib and uncommon cancer types, including renal cell carcinoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, glioblastoma, and leukemia, where MRONJ may also occur.

The assessment of surgical and non-surgical treatment of stage II medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Background

Non-surgical treatment has generally been recommended for stage II medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in preference to surgery. However, non-surgical treatment is not empirically effective. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether surgical or non-surgical treatment leads to better outcomes for stage II MRONJ.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective study, surgery was performed in a total of 28 patients while 24 patients underwent non-surgical treatment. The outcomes of both treatment approaches after 6 months were evaluated and statistically compared. In addition, risk factors for surgical and non-surgical treatments were assessed for each.

Results

Surgical treatment in 25 patients (89.3%) resulted in success, with failure in 3 patients (10.7%). Non-surgical treatment was successful for 8 patients (33.3%) and failed in 16 patients (66.7%). There was therefore a significant difference between surgical and non-surgical treatment outcomes (P<0.01). Regarding risk factors, in non-surgical treatment primary diseases, medications, and drug holiday had a significant effect on outcomes (P<0.01). Risk factors for surgical treatment could not be clarified.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment is more effective than non-surgical treatment for stage II MRONJ, and drug holiday, primary disease, and medication constitute risk factors in non-surgical treatment.

Key words:Bisphosphonate, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, denosumab, management, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Denosumab as a potential treatment alternative for patients suffering from diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis of the mandible-A rapid communication

PURPOSE

Diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (DSO) is a rare disease of the jaw bone. Its treatment is challenging. Different medical and surgical treatment protocols have been proposed; however, none of these treatment protocols produce reliable results. Recently, ibandronate administration has been attempted as a treatment alternative in acute cases of DSO. Due to the similar antiresorptive effect, we sought to explore the application of the human monoclonal antibody to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL), denosumab, in the treatment of DSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One female patient with histologically verified DSO received subcutaneous injections of denosumab (Prolia^® 60 mg). The further course of the disease was followed clinically and by radiography and scintigraphy.

RESULTS

In this case, the use of denosumab displayed promising results in aiding pain relief and reducing inflammatory activity.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that antiresorptive treatment with denosumab can be considered as an alternative treatment for patients suffering from DSO. However further studies, with respect to clarifying the mechanisms of action and defining the necessary medication dose as well as application intervals, have to be conducted.

A multicenter retrospective study of the risk factors associated with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy: can primary wound closure and a drug holiday really prevent MRONJ?

Root amputation, extraction of a single tooth, bone loss or severe tooth mobility, and an unclosed wound were significantly associated with increased risk of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). We recommend a minimally traumatic extraction technique, removal of any bone edges, and mucosal wound closure as standard procedures in patients receiving bisphosphonates.

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the jaws can occur following tooth extraction in patients receiving bisphosphonate drugs. Various strategies for minimizing the risk of MRONJ have been advanced, but no studies have comprehensively analyzed the efficacy of factors such as primary wound closure, demographics, and drug holidays in reducing its incidence. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the relationships between these various risk factors after tooth extraction in patients receiving oral bisphosphonate therapy.

METHODS

Risk factors for MRONJ after tooth extraction were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis. All patients were investigated with regard to demographics; type and duration of oral bisphosphonate use; whether they underwent a discontinuation of oral bisphosphonates before tooth extraction (drug holiday), and the duration of such discontinuation; and whether any additional surgical procedures (e.g., incision, removal of bone edges, root amputation) were performed.

RESULTS

We found that root amputation (OR = 6.64), extraction of a single tooth (OR = 3.70), bone loss or severe tooth mobility (OR = 3.60), and an unclosed wound (OR = 2.51) were significantly associated with increased risk of developing MRONJ.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend a minimally traumatic extraction technique, removal of any bone edges, and mucosal wound closure as standard procedures in patients receiving bisphosphonates. We find no evidence supporting the efficacy of a pre-extraction short-term drug holiday from oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of MRONJ.

Relevant factors for treatment outcome and time to healing in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) are well known, although few studies evaluate the factors that influence treatment outcomes in MRONJ and whether discontinuing antiresorptive medication influences healing.

PURPOSE

(1) Describe the characteristics of a population of patients with MRONJ. (2) Identify the factors associated with favourable outcomes. (3) Identify a temporal correlation between discontinuation of antiresorptives and healing time.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was carried out, including 77 patients with MRONJ treated between 2004 and 2016. Primary outcome was defined as healed/improved vs. worse/stable. Time to healing was set as the secondary outcome. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Primary disease, route of administration, lesion location, and development of complications influenced the outcome of treatment. Significant differences in outcomes according to primary disease (p < 0.05) were found when staging, gender, and lesion location were held constant. Time to healing was longer for patients who discontinued medication more than 3 months after diagnosis than for those who discontinued at diagnosis or before - respectively, 36, 9, and 7 months (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of MRONJ treatment may be influenced by primary disease and route of administration of antiresorptives. Antiresorptive medication discontinuation contributes to reduce healing time in MRONJ.

Further development of the MRONJ minipig large animal model

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rare but serious and potentially severe side effect of antiresorptive therapy with bisphosphonates or denosumab. Recently, a large animal minipig MRONJ model was introduced which led to early necrotic lesions in the majority of extraction sites after bisphosphonate administration. The aim of this project was to modify the preoperative cumulative bisphosphonate dose (zoledronate) and hereby firstly to demonstrate the reliability and reproducibility of the established model. Secondly, the MRONJ lesions should be carefully investigated using clinical and μCT as well as detailed histological analyses. Twelve 1.5-year-old Göttingen minipigs were divided into three groups. In group 1 (n = 3) minipigs received weekly doses of zoledronate intravenously (0.05 mg/kg bodyweight) for 20 weeks. No interventions were performed. In group 2 (n = 6) animals received the identical zoledronate dosage as animals in group 1 and tooth extractions of two premolars (PM 2 and 4) in each jaw (maxilla and mandible) were performed after 12 weeks. Group 3 (n = 3) served as tooth extraction only control (no zoledronate administrations). The jaw-bones were subjected to detailed macroscopic, radiological and histological investigations. All extraction sites (24/24) in animals of group 2 showed clinical, radiological and histological signs of MRONJ (mainly stage II), whereas no bone necrosis was found in group 3. Animals of group 1 and group 2 showed further MRONJ lesions in areas where infections (periodontitis) were present. This is the first large animal model to show a 100% incidence of MRONJ at all extraction sites in bisphosphonate pretreated animals (group 2). In addition, in this preclinical model for MRONJ it is shown that tooth extractions are not mandatory for a MRONJ manifestation. MRONJ also developed in areas of gingival or periodontal infections.

The effect of chronic dental inflammation on development of Stage 0 medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

OBJECTIVE

The pathogenesis of medication-related osteonecrosis of jaw (MRONJ) is poorly understood. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effect of chronic dental inflammation on the development of Stage 0 MRONJ based on histopathological findings.

METHODS

The study involved patients with a history of bisphosphonate use and an indication for tooth extraction. Before surgery, C-terminal telopeptide test (CTX) values were collected from all patients. All tooth extractions were performed according to a determined protocol. To detect whether any medication-related osteonecrotic changes were present in the non-exposed bone, biopsy samples were taken from the alveolar bone.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in the study (39 women and 11 men). The patients were mean age of 57.4 ± 12.1 years. In total, 74 teeth were extracted (29 maxillary and 45 mandibular). Histologic examination of three patients (6%) revealed Stage 0 MRONJ. Postoperatively, the complete mucosal healing success rate was 96%. MRONJ risk was not significantly correlated with low CTX value (p = 0.285).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic inflammation may contribute to Stage 0 MRONJ; however, its role may not be sufficient alone for its development. Application of a predetermined protocol for dentoalveolar processes will help to prevent MRONJ development.

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in osteoporosis patients from Asian countries

Bisphosphonate (BP)-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was first reported in oncology patients in 2003 and subsequently in osteoporosis patients in 2004. Since oral surgical procedures, such as tooth extraction, are also considered one of the major risk factors for ONJ, there is confusion among physicians, dentists, and patients—particularly osteoporosis patients currently taking BPs—regarding the safety of remaining on therapy surrounding these procedures. Many papers about BP-related ONJ (BRONJ) have been published to date. In addition to BRONJ, recent studies have reported an association between ONJ and the antiresorptive therapy denosumab (Dmab; a RANKL-inhibitor). BRONJ and Dmab-related ONJ are together referred to as antiresorptive agent-related ONJ (ARONJ). The pathogenesis of ARONJ still remains unknown. It is forecasted that there will be an increased incidence of patients with osteoporotic fractures and an increased number of prescriptions for antiresorptive agents in Asia in the future. However, prescriptions for antiresorptives for osteoporosis may be restricted in the Asian population as the occurrence of ARONJ may be higher as compared with those in other countries. In this review, we focused on the following topics as it pertains to the Asian osteoporotic population: the oral condition specific for osteoporosis patients; definition, staging, prevalence and incidence of ARONJ; imaging modalities for ARONJ; specific risk factors for ARONJ; prevention strategies for ARONJ, and; cooperation between physicians and dentists in the prevention of ARONJ. Ideally, the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies would cooperate with one another and find more population-specific evidence for the prevention of ARONJ.

Treatment of stage II medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw with necrosectomy and autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Treatment strategies for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) remain controversial. Although the AAOMS suggests a conservative approach, a surgical management with necrosectomy is often required when conservative management has failed. Moreover, recent studies have shown promising results using an early stage surgical treatment. Over the past decade, cell-based bone regeneration utilizing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) received increased attention. MSCs are known to promote wound healing and induce new bone formation in compromised tissue. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the role of MSCs in the management of MRONJ. This study included 6 patients referred to our department with the diagnosis of MRONJ. Upon informed consent, the patients underwent surgical resection of necrotic bone followed by MSCs grafting. The MSCs were separated from bone marrow cells aspirated from the iliac crest using a bone marrow aspirate concentrate system. The MSCs were grafted into the defect with autologous thrombin and the defect was covered with a collagen membrane. In all cases, bony edges were rounded and the wound was closed using a three-layered technique. In the follow-up from 12 to 54 months, all patients including those who had impaired conditions, sepsis, or pathological fracture, showed satisfactory healing with no signs of wound infection. This pilot study indicated that surgical management in combination with MSCs transplantation seems to be a promising treatment modality in the therapy of MRONJ.

Role of microbiological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of actinomyces in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ)

We hypothesized that local infection plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Recent developments in molecular methods have revolutionized new approaches for the rapid detection of microorganisms including those difficult to culture. The aim of our study is to identify the bacterial profiles in MRONJ by microbiological culture and polymerase chain reactions (PCR). A retrospective analysis was performed on MRONJ patients from 2008 to 2014. The bacterial profile from MRONJ bone samples was determined using microbiological culture and PCR. Ninety five patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria with mean age of 69.85 ± 8.71 years. A female predilection was detected. The mandible was more commonly affected than maxilla. Tooth extraction was the frequent triggering factor. Breast cancer was the primary cause for administration and intravenous bisphosphonates were the most commonly administrated antiresorptive drugs. The majority of patients were classified as stage 2. Posterior teeth were most commonly affected. Based on bone culture results, the most common microorganism were both actinomyces and mixed flora. PCR confirmed the presence of actinomyces in 55 patients. Our data suggest that PCR might be an innovative method for detection of microorganisms difficult to culture using traditional microbiological techniques.

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Position Paper 2017 of the Japanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) is an intractable, though rare, complication in cancer patients with bone metastases and patients with osteoporosis who are treated with antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab. Despite the more than 10 years that have passed since the first cases of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) were reported, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of ARONJ remains limited, and data supported by evidence-based medicine are still sparse. However, the diagnosis and staging of ARONJ, identification of risk factors, and development of preventive and therapeutic approaches have advanced significantly over the past decade. The Position Paper 2017 is an updated version of the Position Paper 2010 of the Japanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, which now comprises six Japanese academic societies. The Position Paper 2017 describes a new diagnostic definition for ARONJ, as proposed by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), summarizes our current understanding of the pathophysiology of ARONJ based on a literature search, and suggests methods for physicians and dentists/oral surgeons to manage the disease. In addition, the appropriateness of discontinuing antiresorptive medications (drug holiday) before, during, and after invasive dental treatments is discussed extensively. More importantly, the manuscript also proposes, for the first time, the importance of interactive communication and cooperation between physicians and dentists/oral surgeons for the successful treatment of ARONJ. The Position Paper 2017 is intended to serve as a guide for improving the management of ARONJ patients in Japan.

Short-term perioperative teriparatide therapy for the prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A randomized, controlled preclinical study in rats

OBJECTIVE

Dentoalveolar procedures in patients receiving bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive agents are associated with an increased risk of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of perioperative teriparatide (TPD) therapy in prevention of MRONJ.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Two protocols of TPD therapy were studied. For protocol A, 25 TPD-treated (AT) and 25 control (AC) rats received 5 weekly injection of 0.06 mg/kg zoledronate. At the end of week 5, extraction of bilateral mandibular first molars was performed for all rats, and 4-week TPD (20 μg/kg/day) and saline therapy was started for AT and AC rats, respectively. For protocol B, 25 TPD-treated (BT) and 25 control (BC) rats received 5 weekly injection of 0.06 mg/kg zoledronate. One week later, 4-week TPD and saline therapy was started for BT and BC rats, respectively. Both groups underwent tooth extraction at the end of week 7 of the experiment. All rats were sacrificed 8 weeks after tooth extraction and assessed clinically for bone exposure/fistula, and histologically for density of osteocytes in newly formed bone and empty osteocyte lacunae in alveolar bone.

RESULTS

Incidence of bone exposure/fistula and mean numbers of osteocytes and empty lacunae per 25 mm² (at 400× magnification) were 20%, 15.36, and 2.63 in AT group; 78%, 5.78, and 6.81 in AC group; 14%, 16.94, and 2.08 in BT group; and 78%, 7.54, and 5.95 in BC group; respectively. The differences between AT and AC and between BT and BC were statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference between AT and BT and between AC and BC was found.

CONCLUSION

Four weeks of TPD therapy, beginning at the same day or 2 weeks before tooth extraction, had a potential role in prevention of ONJ.

Lack of cooperation between physicians and dentists during osteoporosis treatment may increase fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw

OBJECTIVE

Our previous questionnaire-based survey suggested that discontinuation of antiresorptive agents before tooth extraction may increase adverse events and disturb osteoporosis treatment without completely preventing osteonecrosis of the jaw (O.N.J.). We also found little cooperation between physicians and dentists in Japan. However, limitations of our previous study included a survey of doctors belonging to small clinics and a small sample size. Our current study aimed to confirm the results of our previous survey in doctors mainly belonging to academia.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire including 14 key clinical queries was sent to 1812 physicians of the Japan Osteoporosis Society, and 629 responses were received.

RESULTS

Dentists requested discontinuation of many medications that were not associated with the incidence of O.N.J. A total of 523 respondents had received discontinuation requests from dentists. Of these, 97 respondents experienced 119 adverse events including 25 fractures and seven incidences of O.N.J. The ratios of valid responses for fractures were 3.6% and 5.3% in patients with a discontinuation of <3 and ≥3 months, respectively. Those for O.N.J. were 0.7% and 1.6%, respectively. Respondents who refused discontinuation requests reported no cases of O.N.J. Approximately 17% of respondents had patients who discontinued osteoporosis treatment following a requested drug discontinuation after tooth extraction. Approximately 62% of respondents did not request oral health care by a dentist before antiresorptive therapy, and 72% reported no cooperation between physicians and dentists in their region.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reconfirms the results of our previous survey. Discontinuation of antiresorptive treatment may increase both fractures and O.N.J. Immediate development of a strategy for sharing information about O.N.J. among physicians, dentists, and patients is required to reduce the incidence of both O.N.J. and skeletal events in osteoporosis treatment. Study limitations were selection bias due to low response rate and possible inaccurate responses to the questionnaire.

Primary wound closure after tooth extraction for prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients under denosumab

OBJECTIVES

Some recent reports have indicated that local infection causes osteonecrosis of the jaw and described that tooth extraction may not be a direct cause of developing medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients receiving antiresorptive medications. Tooth extraction and elimination of the source of infection are expected to reduce the risk of developing MRONJ. However, there is no data regarding prevention for developing osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving denosumab. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of tooth extractions with proper wound closure in patients receiving denosumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty teeth in 19 patients treated with denosumab therapy were extracted under preoperative intravenous antibiotics. Patients who had already developed MRONJ in the extraction sites or who had a history of radiation therapy were excluded. During surgery, bone edges were smoothed and all wounds were closed using the double-layered technique.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven extraction sites (92.5 %) in 17 out of 19 patients (89.5 %) were healed. However, three extraction sites in two patients had complications; one patient had exposed bone and developed MRONJ (stage 1) and the other developed a mucosa fistula. Additional surgical procedures were performed and all wounds were completely healed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tooth extractions in patients receiving denosumab can be performed in an appropriate manner and result in good outcomes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicated that tooth extraction with proper wound closure to avoid secondary infection may be effective for the prevention of MRONJ even in high-risk patients.

A mechanistic study of the interaction of water-soluble borate glass with apatite-bound heterocyclic nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates

Long-term oral and intravenous use of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) is associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw. Although N-BPs bind strongly to bone surfaces via non-covalent bonds, it is possible for extrinsic ions to dissociate bound N-BPs from mineralized bone by competitive desorption. Here, we investigate the effects and mechanism of using an ionic cocktail derived from borate bioactive glass for sequestration of heterocyclic N-BPs bound to apatite. By employing solid-state and solution-state analytical techniques, we confirmed that sequestration of N-BPs from bisphosphonate-bound apatite occurs in the presence of the borate-containing ionic cocktail. Simulations by density functional theory computations indicate that magnesium cation and borate anion are well within the extent of the risedronate or zoledronate anion to form precipitate complexes. The sequestration mechanism is due to the borate anion competing with bisphosphonates for similar electron-deficient sites on the apatite surface for binding. Thus, application of the borate-containing ionic cocktail represents a new topical lavage approach for removing apatite-bound heterocyclic N-BPs from exposed necrotic bone in bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Long-term oral consumption and injections of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) may result in death of the jaw bone when there is traumatic injury to the bone tissues. To date, there is no effective treatment for such a condition. This work reported the use of an ionic cocktail derived from water-soluble borate glass microfibers to displace the most potent type of N-BPs that are bound strongly to the mineral component on bone surfaces. The mechanism responsible for such an effect has been identified to be cation-mediated complexation of borate anions with negatively-charged N-BPs, allowing them to be released from the mineral surface. This borate-containing cocktail may be developed into a novel topical rinse for removing mineral-bound N-BPs from exposed dead bone.

The role of mylohyoid flap in the treatment of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) combines excision of adequate damaged bone and watertight coverage by appropriate vascularized tissue. Local tissues are preferred when possible. This study compares local mucoperiosteal flaps with mylohyoid flaps with special emphasis on their influence on wound healing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 195 patients with BRONJ in the mandible were included in this prospective study. The control group (n = 169) were treated with a mucoperiosteal flap, whereas patients of the study group (n = 26) received a mylohyoid flap.

RESULTS

Recurrence of BRONJ was significantly reduced (p = 0.023) as was extent of necrosis (p = 0.001) in patients with mylohyoid flaps.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates the importance of a sufficient mucosal coverage in surgical treatment of BRONJ. The mylohyoid flap provides an additional tissue coverage, which seems to account for the significantly reduced rate of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The vascularized mylohyoid flap is an important tool in the complex and challenging surgical care of BRONJ.

Introducing a protocol to create bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in rat animal model

OBJECTIVE

Previously published animal investigations on bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) showed a variety of methods for BRONJ induction and inconsistent findings. The aim of present study was to develop a reliable protocol for BRONJ induction in rat animal model.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In a pilot study, 64 rats were randomly divided into 4 groups and 16 subgroups (each containing 2 experimental and 2 control rats) based on the timing of tooth extraction and euthanasia. The experimental and control rats received intraperitoneal injection of 0.06 mg/kg zoledronate and saline, respectively, once a week until sacrificed, and evaluated for presence of bone exposure clinically, and osteonecrosis and new bone formation histologically. The protocol that successfully produced BRONJ in pilot study was tested in a randomized controlled experimental investigation using 45 rats.

RESULTS

In pilot investigation, the highest rate of BRONJ was obtained after four weekly zoledronate injections, at least 4 weeks after tooth extraction. The randomized controlled experimental study verified this finding with a success rate of 83%, and also showed that more prolongation of zoledronate therapy did not increase the BRONJ rate.

CONCLUSION

The protocol developed in the present study could be used reliably for future BRONJ investigations on rats.

Perioperative discontinuation of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy reduces the incidence and severity of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A randomized, controlled, prospective experimental study in rats

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intravenous bisphosphonate discontinuation on incidence and severity of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy rats were randomly divided into 7 groups. In control and S0 groups, weekly injection of saline and 0.06 mg/kg zoledronate (respectively) for 4 weeks, tooth extraction, continuation of injections for 2 months and euthanasia were performed. In group S1, zolendronate injection for 4 weeks, tooth extraction, zolendronate discontinuation for 2 months, and euthanasia were done. For groups S2, S3, S4, and S5, zolendronate injections for 4 weeks, drug holiday for 1-4 months (respectively) before and 2 months after tooth extraction, and euthanasia were performed. Presence of bone exposure, osteonecrosis, and new bone formation were clinically and histologically evaluated.

RESULTS

The rate of BRONJ in control, S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5 groups was 0%, 85%, 80%, 65%, 60%, 50%, and 40%, respectively. In control group, epithelial healing, bone formation, and absence of osteonecrosis; and in S0 group, unhealed epithelium, osteonecrosis, and impaired bone formation were histologically observed. In study groups, prolongation of drug holiday caused diminished osteonecrosis, and improved bone and epithelial healing.

CONCLUSION

Zolendronate discontinuation significantly decreased the incidence and severity of BRONJ in rats.