Management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A systematic review from the APSA outcomes and evidence based practice committee

Ventilation modalities in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia are among the more complex patients to support with mechanical ventilation. They have particular features that add to the difficulties already present in the neonatal patient. A ventilation strategy tailored to the patient's underlying physiology rather than mode of ventilation is a crucial issue for clinicians treating these delicate patients.

A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate quality of conduct and reporting of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. We also aimed to identify characteristics predictive of review quality.

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews summarise evidence by combining sources, but are potentially prone to bias. To counter this, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was published to aid in reporting. Similarly, the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) measurement tool was designed to appraise methodology. The paediatric surgical literature has seen an increasing number of reviews over the past decade, but quality has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic review with a priori design to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of interventions in paediatric surgery. From 01/2010 to 06/2016, we searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Web of Science, Google Scholar, reference lists and journals. Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. We assessed conduct and reporting using AMSTAR and PRISMA. Scores were calculated as the sum of reported items. We also extracted author, journal and article characteristics, and used them in exploratory analysis to determine which variables predict quality.

RESULTS

112 articles fulfilled eligibility criteria (53 systematic reviews; 59 meta-analyses). Overall, 68% AMSTAR and 56.8% PRISMA items were reported adequately. Poorest scores were identified with regards a priori design, inclusion of structured summaries, including the grey literature, citing excluded articles and evaluating bias. 13 reviews were pre-registered and 6 in PRISMA-endorsing journals. The following predicted quality in univariate analysis:, word count, Cochrane review, journal h-index, impact factor, journal endorses PRISMA, PRISMA adherence suggested in author guidance, article mentions PRISMA, review includes comparison of interventions and review registration. The latter three variables were significant in multivariate regression.

CONCLUSIONS

There are gaps in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews in paediatric surgery. More endorsement by journals of the PRISMA guideline may improve review quality, and the dissemination of reliable evidence to paediatric clinicians.

A growing animal model for neonatal repair of large diaphragmatic defects to evaluate patch function and outcome

Objectives

We aimed to develop a more representative model for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair in a large animal model, by creating a large defect in a fast-growing pup, using functional pulmonary and diaphragmatic read outs.

Background

Grafts are increasingly used to repair congenital diaphragmatic hernia with the risk of local complications. Growing animal models have been used to test novel materials.

Methods

6-week-old rabbits underwent fiberoptic intubation, left subcostal laparotomy and hemi-diaphragmatic excision (either nearly complete (n = 13) or 3*3cm (n = 9)) and primary closure (Gore-Tex patch). Survival was further increased by moving to laryngeal mask airway ventilation (n = 15). Sham operated animals were used as controls (n = 6). Survivors (90 days) underwent chest X-Ray (scoliosis), measurements of maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure and breathing pattern (tidal volume, Pdi). Rates of herniation, lung histology and right hemi-diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area was measured.

Results

Rabbits surviving 90 days doubled their weight. Only one (8%) with a complete defect survived to 90 days. In the 3*3cm defect group all survived to 48 hours, however seven (78%) died later (16–49 days) from respiratory failure secondary to tracheal stricture formation. Use of a laryngeal mask airway doubled 90-day survival, one pup displaying herniation (17%). Cobb angel measurements, breathing pattern, and lung histology were comparable to sham. Under exertion, sham animals increased their maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure 134% compared to a 71% increase in patched animals (p<0.05). Patched animals had a compensatory increase in their right hemi-diaphragmatic fiber cross-sectional area (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

A primarily patched 3*3cm defect in growing rabbits, under laryngeal mask airway ventilation, enables adequate survival with normal lung function and reduced maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure compared to controls.

Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair on extracorporeal life support

PURPOSE

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is applied to refractory pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). We evaluate the single-center outcomes of infants with CDH to determine the utility of late repair on ECLS versus repair post-decannulation.

METHODS

Records of infants with CDH (2004-2014) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

CDH was diagnosed in 177 infants. Sixty six (37%) underwent ECLS, of which, 11 died prior to repair, 33 were repaired post-decannulation, and 22 were repaired on ECLS. Repair was delayed in patients on ECLS (19 versus 10 days, p < 0.001). Patients repaired on ECLS had longer ECLS runs (22 versus 12 days, p < 0.001) and higher rates of bleeding and mortality than those repaired post-decannulation. Survival was 54% in infants undergoing ECLS, 65% in those who underwent repair, 36% in those repaired during ECLS, and 85% in those who were decannulated prior to repair. Eighteen percent (N = 4) of deaths after repair on ECLS were attributable to surgical bleeding. The remainder was due to pulmonary hypertension or sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Infants who underwent CDH repair post-decannulation had excellent outcomes and no mortalities attributable to repair. Neonates who underwent repair on ECLS late on bypass had the lowest survival rate with only 18% of mortality in this cohort attributable to surgical bleeding.

Appropriate timing of surgery for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: early or delayed repair?

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to evaluate the influence of timing of surgery on patient outcomes, and to clarify appropriate timing of surgery in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH).

METHODS

A total of 477 neonates with isolated CDH were included. Patients were classified into two groups by timing of surgery: early repair (ER) (≤48 h) and delayed repair (DR) (>48 h). The primary outcome was 90-day survival, with treatment duration (ventilation, oxygen, and hospitalization) being a secondary outcome. To adjust for disease severity, patients were stratified into three severities by Apgar score 1 min ("mild" 8-10, "moderate" 4-7, and "severe" 0-3), and outcomes were compared between ER and DR within each severity.

RESULTS

Although 90-day survival was significantly different among the three severities ("mild" 97%, "moderate" 89%, and "severe" 76%, p = 0.002), there were no differences in 90-day survival between DR and ER within each severity. In "mild", there were no differences in treatment duration between ER and DR. In "moderate", treatment duration was shorter in ER than DR (ventilation 11 vs. 16 days, oxygen 15 vs. 20 days, and hospitalization 34 vs. 48 days). In "severe", treatment duration was shorter in ER than DR, while the best OI was higher in DR than ER.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of CDH repair seems to have no influence on 90-day survival regardless of disease severity. Patients with moderate severity may benefit from the early repair by reducing treatment duration.

Does the ex utero intrapartum treatment to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation procedure change morbidity outcomes for high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivors?

PURPOSE

In high-risk congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), significant barotrauma or death can occur before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be initiated. We previously examined ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT)-to-ECMO in our most severe CDH patients, but demonstrated no survival advantage. We now report morbidity outcomes in survivors of this high-risk cohort to determine whether EXIT-to-ECMO conferred any benefit.

METHODS

All CDH survivors with <15% predicted lung volume (PPLV) from September 1999 to December 2010 were included. We recorded prenatal imaging, defect size, and pulmonary, nutritional, cardiac, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventeen survivors (8 EXIT-to-ECMO, 9 non-EXIT) had an average PPLV of 11.7%. Eight of 9 non-EXIT received ECMO within 2days. There were no significant defect size differences between groups, mostly left-sided (13/17) and type D (12/17). Average follow-up was 6.7years (0-13years). There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes, including supplemental oxygen, diuretics, gastrostomy, weight-for-age Z scores, fundoplication, pulmonary hypertension, stroke or intracranial hemorrhage rate, CDH recurrence, and reoperation. No survivor in our cohort was neurologically devastated. All had mild motor and/or speech delay, which improved in most.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot series of severe CDH survivors, EXIT-to-ECMO confers neither significant survival nor long-term morbidity benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III treatment study.