Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century

Risk factors associated with fatal pulmonary hemorrhage in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with fatal pulmonary hemorrhage (PH) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

The medical records of 583 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who were treated with chemoradiotherapy between July 1992 and December 2009 were reviewed. Fatal PH was defined as PH leading to death within 24 h of its onset. Tumor cavitation size was defined by the cavitation diameter/tumor diameter ratio and was classified as minimum (< 0.25), minor (≥ 0.25, but < 0.5), and major (≥ 0.5).

RESULTS

Of the 583 patients, 2.1% suffered a fatal PH. The numbers of patients with minimum, minor, and major cavitations were 13, 11, and 14, respectively. Among the 38 patients with tumor cavitation, all 3 patients who developed fatal PH had major cavitations. On multivariate analysis, the presence of baseline major cavitation (odds ratio, 17.878), and a squamous cell histology (odds ratio, 5.491) proved to be independent significant risk factors for fatal PH. Interestingly, all patients with fatal PH and baseline major cavitation were found to have tumors with squamous cell histology, and the occurrence of fatal PH in patients having both risk factors was 33.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at high risk of fatal PH could be identified using a combination of independent risk factors.

Evaluation and treatment of high-risk patients with early-stage lung cancer

Standard therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is lobectomy for patients who are able to tolerate such surgery. However, the risk of postoperative morbidity is not trivial, with a 30% to 40% incidence of postoperative complications and a 1% to 5% incidence of operative mortality. Some patients, though technically resectable, refuse surgery or are considered medically inoperable because of insufficient respiratory reserve, cardiovascular disease, or general frailty. This group is considered either "high risk" or "medically inoperable."

Psychosocial challenges of elderly patients coping with cancer

The objective of discussion is to stimulate healthcare professionals to deepen knowledge and understanding of the difficulties, challenges, and developmental tasks of elderly patients coping with cancer. Current research suggests that the psychological impact of cancer is less negative among the elderly, compared with younger patients (such as easier adjustment process). However, the specific psychosocial themes and needs of the elderly patients are not well enough adapted. Evidence-based data may offer clinicians and researchers a better understanding of the coping mechanisms defining elderly people, which may play a role in protecting them from severe emotional distress. Clinical implications would be improved screening, evaluation and intervention skills, which are suitable and adequate to the needs of the elderly population.

Elderly cancer survivorship: an integrative review and conceptual framework

The intersection of ageing and cancer in the phase of post-treatment survivorship represents a large and growing population with unique needs.

PURPOSE

The goal of this work is to review and integrate the current gerontology and oncology literature relevant to elderly cancer survivorship, to identify knowledge gaps and research opportunities and to propose a conceptual model to guide future research. The long-term, global goal is the prevention of morbidity and mortality in elderly cancer survivors by identification of vulnerable elders, maintenance of independence, tailoring of treatment, establishing intervention guidelines and planning for necessary resources within the entire trajectory of cancer survival for older survivors.

METHODS

Targeted and integrative review of selected literature from multiple disciplines. Search engines included PubMed, article reference lists and internet searches for epidemiological data (US Census, World Health Organization, American Cancer Society, Canadian Cancer Cancer Society, etc).

RESULTS

A conceptual model that incorporates the gerontologic, oncologic and personal characteristics of older cancer survivors is proposed that may provide a comprehensive approach by which to frame elderly survivorship research.

CONCLUSION

Cancer survivorship among the elderly is quantitatively and qualitatively different from cancer survivorship among other age groups. The current large numbers and predicted increase in elderly cancer survivors in the near future mandate attention to this population. Future research must consider the complexity of intersecting needs in the gero-oncology population.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based therapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in the phase III BO17704 study (AVAiL)

INTRODUCTION

The placebo-controlled, phase III AVAiL trial evaluated bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line therapy in patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. A retrospective subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-based therapy in elderly patients aged 65 years or older in AVAiL.

METHODS

Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m for up to six cycles plus 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg bevacizumab, or placebo every 3 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

Data were evaluated for 304 patients aged 65 years or older (median age 68 years). Most of the patients were Caucasian (87%) and the majority had adenocarcinoma (83%). In the combined bevacizumab arms, 143 patients (79%) completed ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients who received bevacizumab derived an improvement in progression-free survival compared with placebo (7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, p = 0.023; 15 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.84, p = 0.25). Objective response rates were 40, 29, and 30% in the 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg bevacizumab, and placebo arms, respectively. Overall survival was similar for each bevacizumab arm versus placebo (7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.84, p = 0.31; 15 mg/kg bevacizumab: HR = 0.88, p = 0.44). There were no particular safety signals of concern in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of the randomized, phase III AVAiL trial shows that bevacizumab-based therapy improves outcomes for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Furthermore, bevacizumab-based therapy is well tolerated in elderly patients.

Efficacy and treatment tolerance in older patients with NSCLC: a meta-analysis of five phase III randomized trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are observed in patients >65 years, while 30%-40% of cases occur in patients >70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The objective of the current study was to determine (i) the number of elderly (>70 years) patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC enrolled in phase III trials of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group, (ii) the treatment-related toxicity observed in these patients compared with their younger counterparts, and (iii) the differences in terms of response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) between younger and older patients.

RESULTS

Pooled data from five clinical trials including 1845 patients were analyzed; 1421 (77%) and 424 (23%) were <70 years and ≥70 years, respectively. No difference was observed in terms of the overall response rate and TTP. There was an OS difference between young and older patients, with higher risk for death in older patients. However, when the analysis was carried out after omitting a trial that showed a different trend, no difference was observed. Older patients experienced higher toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This report supports the feasibility of chemotherapy treatment for older NSCLC patients. Optimization of treatment of older NSCLC patients requires the design of prospective older-specific phase III trials for these patients.

A multicenter retrospective study on clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcome in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

We performed a multicenter retrospective comparative study to assess the impact of age on potential differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcome in HCC patients. Characteristics that distinguish elderly from younger HCC patients include lower M/F ratio, worse performance status, lower rate of HCV infection, and less advanced underlying cirrhosis. Elderly patients were less likely to have a liver transplant and more likely to receive supportive care only. However, overall and HCC-specific survival were similar between the two groups.

Background.

There is a paucity of information on the clinical presentation and outcome of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We performed a multicenter retrospective comparative study to assess the impact of age on potential differences in clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcome in HCC patients.

Methods.

We retrospectively analyzed HCC patients treated at two U.S. tertiary institutions from 1998 to 2008. Demographics, tumor parameters, etiology and severity of cirrhosis, treatment, and survival from diagnosis were collected and analyzed. After exclusion of transplanted patients, survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results.

Three hundred thirty-five HCC patients were divided into two groups: “elderly” (95 patients, age ≥70 years) and “younger” (240 patients, aged <70 years). The male/female (M/F) ratio was 5.8:1 and 1.7:1 in the younger and elderly groups, respectively (p < .0001). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection rate was 48.3% in younger and 21.1% in elderly patients (p < .0001); Child class B and C cirrhosis accounted for 35.8% in younger and 25.3% in elderly patients (p = .063). Compared with younger patients, the elderly received transplant less frequently (19.6% versus 5.3%, p = .0002) and were more likely to receive supportive care only (22.9% versus 36.8%, p = .01). No significant differences between the two age groups were seen in tumor parameters or other treatments received. Overall (p = .47) and HCC-specific survival rates (p = .38) were similar in both age groups.

Conclusions.

Characteristics that distinguish elderly from younger HCC patients include lower M/F ratio, worse performance status, lower rate of HCV infection, and less advanced underlying cirrhosis. Elderly patients were less likely to have a liver transplant and more likely to receive supportive care only. However, overall and HCC-specific survival were similar between the two groups.

Physicians' perceptions of cancer care for elderly patients: a qualitative sociological study based on a pilot geriatric oncology program

The aim of this study was to document physicians' perceptions of cancer care for elderly patients within an oncogeriatric coordination pilot unit (UPCOG) created in Paris, France. We focused on how physicians apply new cancer care practices, how they establish new teamwork, and their experience of oncogeriatrics in everyday practice. Qualitative methods were used, including a literature review, observation of working sessions in the oncogeriatric pilot unit, and semi-structured interviews with 28 physicians. The results show how physicians' differing perceptions of geriatric oncology can hinder routine collaboration.

[Management and outcome of French elderly patients with lung cancer: an IFCT survey]

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer in the elderly is considerably increasing in frequency, representing a public health issue. Those patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and probably not optimally treated.

METHODS

We performed a survey of the management and the outcome of lung cancer patients aged 70 and more in France between August 2002 and September 2003 according to age categories (70-74, 75-79 and > or =80 years). One thousand six hundred and twenty-seven patients were analysed for descriptive data and 1595 for survival.

RESULTS

Median age was 75 (70-96) and male:female ratio was 4.26 with a decrease across the age categories from 5.1 to 3.0. Tobacco-linked comorbidities were frequent. The median value of Charlson's index was 2. About 58% had a performance status (PS) 0 or 1, 30% a PS 2 and 12% a PS>2. The proportion of never-smokers (11.6%) increased significantly with age categories. Regarding imaging procedures, as much as 83.3% of the patients had at least a chest CT-scan and a brain CT-scan (or MRI) and an abdominal ultrasound or CT-scan. Best Supportive Care (BSC) as only treatment was administered to 16.1% of the patients. Among patients specifically treated, 22.9% were operated, 21.8% received mediastinal irradiation and 71.5% chemotherapy. Overall, median survival time was 9.14 months with 23.5% deaths occurring before 3 months. Low category of age, good PS, non-smoking and high body mass index (BMI) were favorable independent prognostic factors of survival. Age, PS and tobacco smoking were prognostic of early death.

CONCLUSIONS

A large majority of elderly lung cancer patients in France are managed like younger counterparts regarding diagnostic procedures and treatment. Age remains an independent prognostic factor as well for overall survival as for early death.

EORTC elderly task force position paper: approach to the older cancer patient

As a result of an increasing life expectancy, the incidence of cancer cases diagnosed in the older population is rising. Indeed, cancer incidence is 11-fold higher in persons over the age of 65 than in younger ones. Despite this high incidence of cancer in older patients, solid data regarding the most appropriate approach and best treatment for older cancer patients are still lacking, mostly due to under-representation of these patients in prospective clinical trials. The clinical behaviour of common malignant diseases, e.g. breast, ovarian and lung cancers, lymphomas and acute leukaemias, may be different in older patients because of intrinsic variation of the neoplastic cells and the ability of the tumour host to support neoplastic growth. The decision to treat or not these patients should be based on patients' functional age rather than the chronological age. Assessment of patients' functional age includes the evaluation of health, functional status, nutrition, cognition and the psychosocial and economic context. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the influence of age on cancer presentation and cancer management in older cancer patients and to provide suggestions on clinical trial development and methodology in this population.

EORTC Elderly Task Force experts' opinion for the treatment of colon cancer in older patients

As a result of an increasing life expectancy, the incidence of colon cancer in the older population is rising. As a consequence oncologists and their older patients commonly face the dilemma of whether or not to give/receive treatment for colon cancer. However, the paucity of large, well conducted prospective trials makes it difficult to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for these patients. The current evidence supports the safety and efficacy of treatment for colon cancer in fit older patients and demonstrates that treatment outcome can be similar to that of their younger counterparts. However, it should be noted that these data are derived from retrospective studies which are likely to suffer from selection bias. Despite a growing body of data, further work is still needed to establish optimal strategies to care for this special population and prospective specific trials for older colon cancer patients are clearly needed.

EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a common health issue in the elderly population. Nevertheless, the paucity of large, well-conducted prospective trials makes it difficult to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for these patients. The present paper reviews the currently available evidence regarding treatment of all stages of NSCLC in elderly patients. Surgery remains the standard for early-stage disease, though pneumonectomy is associated with higher incidence of postoperative mortality in elderly patients. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, it is also not recommended in elderly patients. Elderly patients seem to derive the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy as younger patients do, with no significant increase in toxicity. For locally advanced NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be offered to selected elderly patients as there is a higher risk for toxicity reported in the elderly population. Third-generation single-agent treatment is considered the standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in prospective trials. Unfortunately, with the exception of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, prospective elderly-specific NSCLC trials are lacking and the majority of recommendations made are based on retrospective data, which might suffer from selection bias. Prospective elderly-specific trials are needed.

Clinical experience of cancer specialists and geriatricians involved in cancer care of older patients: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is an important health problem in older persons. The aim of this study was to explore how cancer specialists and geriatricians manage the treatment of older patients with cancer.

METHODS

Interviews using semi-structured open-ended questions.

SAMPLE

physicians working in oncology and geriatric medicine at McGill affiliated hospitals.

ANALYSIS

Grounded-theory approach.

RESULTS

24 cancer specialists and 17 geriatricians participated. There was considerable variability with regard to assessment, treatment plan, and follow-up care and little collaboration between both specialists. The cancer specialists have more older cancer patients in their practice and collaborate with geriatricians mostly to deal with complications of cancer treatment. However, both groups of specialists expressed a desire to collaborate more and had similar research priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variability in the management of older patients with cancer. Care for older patients with cancer might be improved by more collaboration between cancer specialists and geriatricians.

Prognostic factors in the diagnostic work-up of cancer patients in an internal medicine department: does age matter?

INTRODUCTION

Increasing life expectancy in the general population has led to a rise in the incidence of cancer and new challenges with regard to the diagnosis, therapy and prognosis of this disease.

AIM

To assess prognostic factors in the initial work-up of patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer in an Internal Medicine Service, particularly those related with age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was undertaken with 224 patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer, as confirmed by histological or cytological study. The neoplasms included respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown origin, gynaecological, hepatobiliary and others. Before reaching the diagnosis, the following factors were investigated in all patients: functional status [Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)], comorbidity (Charlson scale), body mass index (BMI), serum cholesterol and albumin concentrations, cognitive level (Mini-mental test), quality of life (Short Form 36 questionnaire), and extension of the disease according to established criteria. Survival at 1 year was analysed. Statistical analyses were done with spss 11.0 for Windows, using a forward stepwise (likelihood ratio) method to construct the model and a Cox multivariate model for the survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients, 167 men (74.5%) and 57 women (25.5%), with a mean age of 66.1 +/- 12.3 years were studied. KPS was >or= 70 in 84% and comorbidity was zero or one in 74%. BMI was 24.25 +/- 4.3, cholesterol 180.7 +/- 4.3, albumin 3.32 +/- 0.5 and Mini-mental score 25.4 +/- 3.7. Metastasis was seen in 131 patients (58.5%) and local disease in 93 cases (41.5%). One-year survival was 38.8% (87 patients) with a mean of 203.8 +/- 143 days. In the Cox analysis, the independent predictive factors for survival were KPS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.951; 95% CI = 0.930-0.974; p < 0.01], metastatic dissemination (HR = 2.422; 95% CI = 1.643-3.571; p < 0.01), physical quality of life (HR = 0.978; 95% CI = 0.962-0.995; p < 0.01) and albumin (HR = 0.653; 95% CI = 0.455-0.936; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial work-up of patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer in an Internal Medicine Service, functional status, dissemination, the physical component in the quality of life scale and serum albumin levels were independent prognostic factors for survival. Age was not an independent prognostic factor and should not be used as a basis for adopting diagnostic or therapeutic decisions in these patients.

First- and second-line treatment of advanced metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a global view

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer is dependent on disease stage. For patients with metastasis or locally advanced disease, the importance of finding therapeutic schemes that may benefit this population is important. This review discusses therapeutic options for first- and second-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. According to current data, the combination of two cytotoxic agents is the optimum first-line treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and performance status of 0–1. Addition of bevacizumab has shown to provide an even longer survival and to increase response rate. Within the first-line setting, erlotinib appears to be effective in the treatment of elderly patients who would not derive a benefit from standard chemotherapy or those refusing standard chemotherapy. The administration of erlotinib as first-line maintenance therapy is being assessed. There are currently three drugs approved for second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. These drugs have proven to be effective in phase III trials. In the phase III trial BR.21 study, the response rate was 8.9% in the erlonitib group, and less than 1% in placebo; median response duration was 7.9 months and 3.7 months, respectively; and the median survival was 6.7 months and 4.7 with erlotinib and placebo, respectively. One-year survival was 31% and 21% with erlotinib and placebo, respectively. In addition, the BR.21 trial revealed that significantly greater improvements in overall quality of life and in both physical and emotional functioning were observed in the erlotinib arm as compared with the placebo arm. Erlotinib is not significantly associated with hematologic adverse effects. Erlotinib is administered orally, and does not require concomitant administration of other drugs, thus causing patients less inconvenience. Analysis of data from different subgroups included in the BR.21 trial show that overall survival is similar among women and men, among patients with adenocarcinoma and epidermoid carcinoma or Asian patients compared with other ethnicities. Combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced disease has been evaluated as anti-angiogenic properties. This combination therapy has provided promising results which should be confirmed in future studies.

Retrospective study of efficacy and toxicity on patients older than 70 years within a randomized clinical trial of two cisplatin-based combinations in patients with small-cell lung cancer

A retrospective analysis based on the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) clinical trial of high-dose epirubicin/cisplatin in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was performed. Patients younger than 70 years vs. older than 70 years old were analyzed to evaluate the influence of age on response to treatment, toxicity, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of the chemotherapy schedule. Three hundred and thirty eight patients <70 years and sixty-four >70 years, were analyzed. Objective responses were similar in both groups. In patients less than 70 years higher TTP (36 weeks vs. 32 weeks) and OS (47 weeks vs. 42 weeks) were seen, attributable to the improved results observed in the subgroup of patients with limited disease (LD). No significant differences were observed when toxicity profile of both groups was compared, except for a higher rate of febrile neutropenia observed in the elderly group with extensive disease (4.6% vs. 8.8%, p=0.01). In the subgroup of patients with LD, elderly patients received less total cisplatin dose (401 vs. 508 mg/m(2), p=0.01) although less treatment delays were reported (10 days vs. 15 days, p=0.05). Age was likely to be a negative prognostic factor for OS of elderly patients with LD. It also seemed to be related to a greater dose reduction, which may explain that toxic episodes and delays occurred more frequently in the younger patients receiving the full scheduled dose. However, the definitive reason to explain this could not be established due to the characteristics of our analysis.

Docetaxel plus gemcitabine as front-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II study

BACKGROUND

The docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase II study was conducted in order to evaluate its efficacy in elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients, aged > or =70 years, with locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and performance status (PS) < or =2 (ECOG) received gemcitabine 1100 mg/m(2) (days 1+8) and docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) (day 8) with rhG-CSF support.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were enrolled. One (1.3%) complete and 23 (29.9%) partial responses were achieved (intention to treat analysis: ORR 31.2%; 95% CI 20.82-41.51%) whereas tumor growth control was achieved in 53.3% of patients. The median TTP was 4.1 months, the median overall survival 9.4 months and the 1- and 2-year survival rate 37.9% and 10.7%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 18.2% and febrile neutropenia in 3 (3.9%) patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mild with grade 2-3 asthenia occurring in 22.1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DG regimen is an active and well-tolerated front-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with lung adenocarcinomas and merits further evaluation in prospective randomized trials.

Age and comorbidity as independent prognostic factors in the treatment of non small-cell lung cancer: a review of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group trials

PURPOSE

This study analyzed patients enrolled in two large, prospectively randomized trials of systemic chemotherapy (adjuvant/palliative setting) for non-small-cell lung Cancer (NSCLC). The main objective was to determine if age and/or the burden of chronic medical conditions (comorbidity) are independent predictors of survival, treatment delivery, and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Baseline comorbid conditions were scored using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), a validated measure of patient comorbidity that is weighted according to the influence of comorbidity on overall mortality. The CCI score (CCIS) was correlated with demographic data,(ie, age, sex, race), performance status (PS), histology, cancer stage, patient weight, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, outcomes of chemotherapy delivery (ie, type, total dose, and dose intensity), survival, and response.

RESULTS

A total of 1,255 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 61 years (range, 34 to 89 years); 34% of patients were elderly (at least 65 years of age); and 31% had comorbid conditions at randomization. Twenty-five percent of patients had a CCIS of 1, whereas 6% had a CCIS of 2 or greater. Elderly patients were more likely to have a CCIS equal to or greater than 1 compared with younger patients (42% v 26%; P < .0001), as were male patients (35% v 21%; P < .0001) and patients with squamous histology (36% v 29%; P = .001). Although age did not influence overall survival, the CCIS appeared prognostic (CCIS 1 v 0; hazard ratio 1.28; 95%CI, 1.09 to 1.5; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

In these large, randomized trials, the presence of comorbid conditions (CCIS > or = 1), rather than age more than 65 years, was associated with poorer survival.

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide and paclitaxel in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: a phase II study

Although platinum-based two-drug combinations represent the elective therapeutic approach for advanced/metastatic NSCLC, there is still interest in exploring the efficacy and tolerability of platinum-free combinations including third generation agents in selected NSCLC population. Based on the satisfying activity of gemcitabine (G), ifosfamide (I) and paclitaxel (T) as single agents in NSCLC, we have designed a phase II study to explore an alternative approach to platinum-containing regimens using a combination of these three drugs. To investigate the activity/toxicity of T 175 mg/m2 on day 1, I 3 g/m2 on day 1 (with Mesna uroprotection) and G 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1-8, every 3 weeks in the treatment of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, 46 patients (38 male, 8 female) with NSCLC were enrolled: mean age 58 (range 33-70); Stage IIIB/IV=15/31; ECOG PS 0-1/2=31/15;

HISTOLOGY

adenocarcinoma=20, squamous=14, large cell=3, NSCLC=8, adenosquamous=1. A total of 221 cycles have been administered (median number 4.8 for patients). In intent-to-treat analysis, partial response was achieved in 17 patients (36.95%), stable disease and progressive disease was detected in 16 (34.78%) and 10 (21.73%) patients, respectively. Time to progression was 30.9 weeks; median survival time was 42.7 weeks; the survival rates at 12 and 18 months were 34.79 and 15.21%, respectively. No toxic deaths occurred. No patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia grade 3 occurred in 10 patients (21.7%); Anemia grade 3 in 1 (2.1%); Thrombocytopenia grade 2 in two patients (4.3%) and grade 3 in one (2.1%). Peripheral neuropathy grade 1 occurred in ten (21.7%) and grade 2 in two patients (4.3%). Additional non-haematological toxicities were mild nausea, emesis and fatigue. GIT is well tolerated and active regimen in both advanced and metastatic NSCLC. These data suggest future investigations for GIT schedule as a possible alternative to platinum-based regimens in selected advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients where survival, tolerability and quality of life are the primary goals.

The illness trajectory of elderly cancer patients across cultures: SIOG position paper

BACKGROUND

Due to the aging of the population, cancer has become a health priority worldwide. While the number of elderly cancer patients is rapidly increasing, many barriers still exist to their effective management. Compared with their younger counterparts, the elderly are less likely to receive optimal medical, psychological and spiritual treatment provided in a culturally competent manner.

DESIGN

The scanty literature on cultural competence in elderly cancer patients has been reviewed. Additional material has been selected based on the authors' clinical research in medical oncology and psycho-oncology, and on their scholarly work in anthropology and bioethics.

RESULTS

The aging process is a synergistic product of biological, behavioral and social issues within a cultural context. Knowledge about how older people understand, perceive and experience their illness trajectory and make choices is essential to the planning and delivering of effective cancer care.

CONCLUSION

This position paper of the SIOG Task Force on Cultural Competence in the Elderly creates awareness of the influence of culture in geriatric oncology. Negotiating cross-cultural issues in geriatric oncology helps managing possible conflicts between patients, families and physicians over differing health care values, beliefs, or practices. Possible areas of future scholarly investigation and clinical research are identified.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

More than two thirds of patients who die of lung cancer in the United States are over 65 years of age. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed over the age of 65 and about 30% over the age of 70.

METHODS

The authors review recent data from large randomized trials on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. They discuss age-related changes in organ function, comorbidities and frailty in the elderly, and chemotherapy treatment in elderly patients with NSCLC.

RESULTS

Randomized trials suggest that postoperative chemotherapy improves survival after surgery in patients with stage IB to IIIA NSCLC, and awareness of the efficacy of this approach is growing in the scientific community. Clinical data obtained in the young population cannot be automatically adopted in the elderly counterpart. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly because of comorbidity and organ failure, and after lung surgery they are considered at higher risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicity. The survival benefit obtained with platin-based chemotherapy may vanish or decrease in the elderly due to a potential higher toxic death rate or lower compliance to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified schedules or attenuated dose of platin-containing chemotherapy should be investigated in the adjuvant setting by specifically designed trials. Specifically designed prospective trials are needed to elucidate the role of this approach in the elderly.

Gero-Oncology Nursing Research

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES

To analyze the development of gero-oncology research through a critical review of nursing and other relevant research as well as the present state of practice.

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles, book chapters, and personal experience.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cancer in older adults is viewed through two investigative perspectives. The assumptions, questions, theoretical frames, and research design that follow from these investigative perspectives do not adequately meet the need to examine the interplay of responses to aging, cancer, and nursing practice. The mismatch of need, knowledge, and resources marks older adults with cancer as a special population in need of far more sophisticated research. With the synthesis of a new perspective, gero-oncology nursing research becomes age focused, more precisely shaping theoretical, methodologic, and analytic approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Uniform attachment of chronologic age or other simple age-related variables to investigations, which is the primary consideration of age-related research, is irrelevant for older adults who are diagnosed with, treated for, live with, survive, and die from cancer. Shaping the next phase of gero-oncology research with a focus on age precisely integrates theoretical, methodologic, and analytic approaches through language specific to older adults and cancer.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Shifting perspectives in gero-oncology nursing research will better inform future practice.

Pathological, biological and clinical characteristics, and surgical management, of elderly women with breast cancer

For this retrospective study, we divided 3814 patients with invasive operable breast cancer into five groups based on their age at diagnosis. Univariate analysis showed that the elderly women had larger tumours with more axillary node involvement and lymphovascular invasion, more estrogen- and progesterone-positive tumours, lower grades and proliferative indices, and were less likely to be c-erbB2 positive. They were more likely to have been diagnosed in a symptomatic state and to have undergone mastectomy, and less likely to have undergone mammary reconstruction or axillary dissection, or to have a family history of breast cancer. The multinomial regression model showed that pT, pN, ER, PgR, the type of diagnosis, and a family history were independently associated with each other. The results of this study show that elderly women are more likely to have larger and more frequently N+ tumours, but these are biologically less aggressive and usually seem to receive less invasive surgical treatment.

Safety profile of platinum-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. More than 50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed at > 65 years of age and approximately one-third of all patients are > 70 years of age. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterpart because of the progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive platinum-based chemotherapy, the standard medical treatment for advanced NSCLC. In clinical practice, single-agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. Feasibility of platinum-based chemotherapy remains an open issue and has to be proven prospectively. Moreover, a multidimensional geriatric assessment for individualised treatment choice in NSCLC elderly patients is mandatory. This review focuses on the currently-available evidences for the treatment of elderly patients affected by advanced NSCLC with regards to the role and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Surgery and pre-operative irradiation for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age

OBJECTIVE

Reports of multimodal treatment regimens especially focusing on locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer in the elderly, aged>75 years, are unavailable. We have tried to identify and evaluate pre- and peri-operative risk factors for morbidity and mortality and outcome after irradiation/surgery regimens in such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective registration of 86 consecutive patients aged>75 years undergoing elective surgery after irradiation 46-50 Gy for either primary locally advanced rectal cancer (n=51) or recurrent rectal cancer (n=35) from January 1991 to August 2003, 51 men and 35 women, median age 78 years (range 75-85 years) in a national cancer hospital.

RESULTS

Multivisceral resections were needed in 63% of patients and 70% R0 resections were obtained in locally advanced cases and 46% in recurrent ones. Both in-hospital- and 30-day-mortality was 3.5%. Sixty-two postoperative complications occurred in 38 patients, three of them fatal. Both operation times over 5 h and transfusion of more than 3 SAG were prognostic factors regarding infections. Estimated five-year survival in R0 patients was 46%. Estimated five-year survival for patients with nonmetastatic tumours with locally advanced primary cancer was 29% and for locally recurrent rectal cancer 32%. Old males had a higher mortality rate the first year after surgery than females with only 65% relative survival compared to a matched normal population. The estimated five-year local recurrence rates were 24% for R0 resections and 54% for R1 resections (P=0.434 ns) and 24% and 45% for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer (P=0.248 ns), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Thorough pre-operative evaluation and preparation and judicious surgery are important for achieving potentially curative treatment with acceptable morbidity in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer in patients over 75 years of age. We suggest that these patients should be evaluated and considered for treatment by multidisciplinary teams as younger patients.

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Reduces Locoregional Recurrence in Elderly Women with High-risk Breast Cancer

AIMS

Clinical trials of adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy have largely excluded women aged 70 years or over, even though they comprise 30% of the breast cancer population. This study examined outcomes in elderly women with high-risk breast cancer treated with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were analysed for 233 women aged 70 years or over with high-risk breast cancer (tumours > 5 cm or > or = 4 positive axillary nodes) treated with mastectomy and referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1989 to 1997. Tumour and treatment characteristics were compared between two cohorts: women treated with PMRT (n = 147) vs women treated without PMRT (n = 86). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 10-year Kaplan-Meier locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence, breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival were carried out.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. The distribution of tumour sizes was similar in the two groups. Compared with women treated without PMRT, higher proportions of women who underwent PMRT had four or more positive nodes (83% vs 67%, P = 0.01) and positive surgical margins (14% vs 4%, P = 0.02). Systemic therapy, used in 94% of women, was comparable in the two cohorts (P = 0.63). Elderly women treated with PMRT had significantly lower LRR compared with women treated without PMRT (16% vs 28%, P = 0.03). No differences in distant recurrence, breast cancer-specific survival or overall survival were observed in the two treatment groups (all P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the omission of PMRT and the presence of high-grade histology were significant predictors of LRR, whereas an increasing number of positive nodes was significantly associated with distant recurrence and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In women aged 70 years or over with tumours greater than 5 cm or four or more positive nodes, significantly lower LRR was observed in women treated with radiotherapy compared with women treated without radiotherapy. PMRT should be considered in the management of elderly women with these high-risk characteristics.

Pretreatment quality of life and functional status assessment significantly predict survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a prognostic analysis of the multicenter Italian lung cancer in the elderly study

PURPOSE

To study the prognostic value for overall survival of baseline assessment of functional status, comorbidity, and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 566 patients enrolled onto the phase III randomized Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) study were analyzed. Functional status was measured as activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL). The presence of comorbidity was assessed with a checklist of 33 items; items 29 and 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were used to estimate QoL. ADL was dichotomized as none versus one or more dependency. For IADL and QoL, three categories were defined using first and third quartiles as cut points. Comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson scale. Analysis was performed by Cox model, and stratified by treatment arm.

RESULTS

Better values of baseline QoL (P = .0003) and IADL (P = .04) were significantly associated with better prognosis, whereas ADL (P = .44) and Charlson score (P = .66) had no prognostic value. Performance status 2 (P = .006) and a higher number of metastatic sites (P = .02) also predicted shorter overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment global QoL and IADL scores, but not ADL and comorbidity, have significant prognostic value for survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with chemotherapy. Using these scores in clinical practice might improve prognostic prediction for treatment planning.

Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence

There is general consensus that screening can reduce mortality from colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer among persons in their 50s and 60s. However, few screening trials have included persons over age 70 years. Therefore, indirect evidence must be used to determine when results in younger persons should be extrapolated to older persons. In this review, we focus on cancer screening tests that are well accepted in younger persons (mammography, Papanicolaou smears, and colorectal cancer screening) and discuss the strength of inference concerning benefits and harms of screening older persons. Some aspects of aging favor screening (eg, increased absolute risk of dying of cancer) whereas other aspects do not (eg, decreased life expectancy). Age also affects the behavior of some cancers (eg, increases the proportion of slow-growing breast cancers) and affects the accuracy of some screening tests (eg, increases the accuracy of mammography; decreases the accuracy of sigmoidoscopy). These effects make the application of evidence in younger populations to older populations complex. However, given the heterogeneity of the elderly population, there is no evidence of one age at which potential benefits of screening suddenly cease or potential harms suddenly become substantial for everyone. Therefore, characteristics of individual patients that go beyond age should be the driving factors in screening decisions. For example, persons who have a life expectancy less than 5 years or persons who would decline treatment should generally not be screened. Decisions to either continue or discontinue screening in the elderly should be based on health status, the benefits and harms of the test, and preferences of the patient, rather than solely on the age of the patient.

Clinical Pharmacology Issues Relevant to the Dosing and Toxicity of Chemotherapy Drugs in the Elderly

Persons over the age of 65 years are the fastest growing segment of the U.S. population. In the next 30 years, they will comprise more than 20% of the population. Fifty percent of all cancers occur in this age group, and therefore, there is an expected rise in the total cancer burden. Data are becoming available that will better guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population. In this paper, information regarding age-related physiologic changes and their relationship to pharmacology, functional status, and hematopoiesis is presented. The adjuvant treatment of breast and colon cancer, as well as the primary therapy of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma is reviewed. The treatment of more advanced breast, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer is also discussed.

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the evidence

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been questioned due to the perceived potential for higher toxicity in this population, possibly attributable to progressive organ failure and comorbidities. This non-systematic review presents the authors' selection of key evidence for the use of chemotherapy for elderly patients with NSCLC. To date, single-agent chemotherapy with agents such as vinorelbine, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and paclitaxel has been a reasonable option. Data on non-platinum-based combinations are limited, but recent investigations of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show superiority over either agent alone. Retrospective subset analyses from large randomized trials suggest that the efficacy and tolerability of platinum-based combination chemotherapy are similar in both the elderly and their younger counterparts. Further phase III trials that specifically examine platinum-based combinations in selected elderly NSCLC patients are therefore warranted. The potential impact of new targeted therapies-alone or in combination with chemotherapy-is being investigated.

Analysis of treatment practices for elderly cancer patients in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

Older patients are underrepresented in many areas of cancer services utilization and in clinical trial enrollment. This study evaluates whether age, when adjusted for sex, comorbidity, stage, tumor site, geography, and time period, is predictive of cancer treatment practice.

METHODS

First, we used the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR) to examine for any apparent differences in treatment practices between elderly (> or = 70 years) and younger patients in the last three decades. Second, we performed a chart review of 1,505 patients with lung, breast, and colorectal cancers seen in Ontario either at an urban center, the Princess Margaret Hospital, or at a rural center, the Northwestern Regional Cancer Centre. Patients were randomly selected from two time periods, 1977 to 1978 and 1997; and the study population was to comprise at least 50% elderly patients.

RESULTS

OCR data demonstrated that, in some settings, such as colorectal cancer, the proportions of elderly cancer patients who were referred to cancer centers and who received any cancer treatment were lower than their younger counterparts. The chart review data showed that increasing age was a significant negative predictor for receiving any cancer treatment (P < .001, multivariate analysis) and for having a clinical trial discussion with the treating specialist (P < .001, multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSION

Independent of other factors, older age is consistently a cause of disparity in cancer treatment practice and in clinical trial discussion with patients. By increasing the accrual rate of elderly cancer patients in clinical trials, a better understanding of appropriate therapies for this patient population can be obtained and may, thereby, impact on their cancer-related morbidity and mortality.

[Lung cancer--What has changed in two decades]

Lung cancer (LC) is a major public health problem and it is the most common form of cancer in men. It remains the most common cause of cancer death in men and women. In the initial decades of the smoking-caused epidemic, squamous cell carcinoma was the most frequent type. Recently there was a shift toward predominance of adenocarcinoma. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the demographic factors and factors connected with the disease in patients whose LC was diagnosed in two distinct periods in H.S. João (1979-1982 and 1999-2002). A total of 750 LC were diagnosed. Between 1979-1982 a total of 236 patients were diagnosed LC (84.3% male; mean age 60.0 +/- 10.0). The most common histological type was squamous cell (46.2%). A total of 514 LC were diagnosed during the period 1999-2002 (83.9% male; mean age 64.7 +/- 10.8) and adenocarcinoma was the most frequent (47.1%). There were significant differences, between the two periods analysed concerning smoking (increase in the number of smokers; 73.7% vs 82.4%), age (increase in the mean age of patients) and histology (higher percentage of ade notnocarcinoma and reduction of squamous cell and small-cell lung cancer). The percentage of patients treated symptomatically decreased significantly in 20 years (26% vs 19%). As a conclusion we can say that there was an evolution of histological types in the last two decades and a reduction in the number of patients submitted to symptomatic treatment alone.

Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. In limited disease, the median survival time is about 12-16 months, with a 4%-5% long-term survival rate; in extensive disease the median survival time is 7-11 months. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed when they are over the age of 65, and about 30% are over 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterparts, because of age-related progressive reductions in organ function and comorbidities. The standard therapy for limited disease is combined chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving complete responses. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated, considering the slight survival benefit and potential for substantial toxicity incurred with this treatment. The best approach is to design clinical trials that specifically include geriatric assessment to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for elderly SCLC patients. Survival improvement for SCLC patients requires a better understanding of tumor biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC, but a minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are reported more commonly than positive ones. This review focuses on the main issues in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Locoregional recurrence risks in elderly breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy

This study examined tumour and treatment characteristics in elderly women treated with mastectomy without radiotherapy and compared their outcomes to younger counterparts. Data were analysed for 2362 women aged 50 years and older referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Canada between 1989 and 1997. The women had invasive T1-4, N0-N3, M0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinical characteristics and patient outcomes were compared between two age cohorts: 50-69 (n = 1423) and 70+ years (n = 939). Median follow-up was 8.3 years. Tumours > 5 cm were present in 5% of women aged 50-69 and 3.5% of women aged 70+, respectively. The distribution of nodal stage was similar in the two age cohorts but older women were more likely to have fewer axillary nodes removed (P = 0.009). Fewer women aged 70+ had grade III histology (P = 0.002) and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative status (P < 0.001). The rates of systemic therapy use were comparable in the two age groups. With tumours > 5 cm, locoregional recurrence (LRR) were 13.7% and 30.0% in women aged 50-69 and 70+, respectively. With 1-3 positive nodes (N+), LRR were 14.8% and 13.0% in women aged 50-69 and 70+. In the presence of 4 N+, LRR were 16.8% and 30.8% in women aged 50-69 and 70+. On multivariate analysis, age was not significantly associated with LRR (P = 0.62). Independent prognostic factors for LRR were grade III histology, lymphovascular invasion and positive nodal status. This study suggests that despite more favourable tumour characteristics and comparable systemic therapy use, women aged 70+ years have similar or higher postmastectomy LRR risks compared to younger women. Chronologic age alone should not preclude these women from consideration of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly: Results of an International Expert Panel

The best treatment for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still debated. To guide clinical management of these patients and suggest the priorities for clinical research in this field, an International Expert Panel met in Naples, Italy, on April 19 to 20, 2004. Results and conclusions based on a review of evidence available in the literature to date are presented in this article. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended to better define prognosis and to predict tolerance to treatment. In the first randomized study dedicated to elderly NSCLC patients, single-agent vinorelbine showed superiority over supportive care alone, both in terms of survival and quality of life. In a large randomized trial, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show any advantage over either agent alone. Subset analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with an acceptable increase in toxicity for elderly patients. These data should be interpreted cautiously because retrospective subgroup analyses are encumbered by selection bias; hence, randomized trials dedicated to platinum-based chemotherapy for nonselected elderly patients are warranted. Several promising biologic therapies are under investigation; however, with present data, target-based agents as first-line treatment for elderly NSCLC patients are not yet recommended. Clinical research, with trials specifically designed for elderly patients, is mandatory. With the current evidence, single-agent chemotherapy with a third-generation drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, a taxane) should be the recommended option for nonselected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Platinum-based chemotherapy is a viable option for fit patients with adequate organ function. Best supportive care remains important, in addition to chemotherapy or as the exclusive option for patients who are unsuitable for more aggressive treatment.