Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging

The current status of FDG-PET in tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning

Positron emission tomography (PET) scan, mainly using 18 F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer, is currently widely accepted as a diagnostic tool in oncology. It may lead to a change in staging and therefore in treatment management. PET can also be used to define the target volume in radiation treatment planning and to evaluate treatment response. In this review, we focused on issues concerning the role of PET in target volume delineation, both for the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: does PET allow accurate tumour delineation and does it improve the outcome of radiotherapy, in terms of reduced toxicity or a higher tumour control probability? Combined computer tomography (CT) and PET information seems to influence target volume delineation. Using (CT-) PET scan, interobserver variability is being reduced. Only few studies compared delineation based on PET with pathologic examination, showing a complex relation. Preliminary results concerning incorporation of PET information in to target volume delineation varies in different tumour sites. In the field of lung cancer, incorporation of PET seems to improve tumour coverage and spare normal tissues, which may lead to less toxicity or the possibility to escalate dose. In oesophageal cancer and in lymphoma, PET scan can be used to include PET positive lymph nodes in the target volume. In most other tumour sites not enough data are currently available to draw definitive conclusions about the role of PET in radiation treatment planning.

Clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative FDG-PET in primary breast cancer

The present study was aimed to determine the clinicopathologic factors that predict false negative (FN) PET results in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 116 breast lesions in 111 patients (pre-menopausal 45; perimenopausal 15; post-menopausal 51) with known or suspicious of breast cancer who underwent FDG-PET scans for staging, were included in this study. The median age was 52+/-11 years (range 32-79 years). All PET studies results were correlated with follow-up surgical pathology results. A cut off value of 2.5 was considered for positive or negative PET results. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with FN results.

RESULTS

Of 116 breast lesions, 85 were malignant and 31 were benign on histopathology. Of the 85 malignant lesions, 41 were true positive (TP) and 44 were FN. Among the 31 benign lesions, 30 were true negative and one was false positive. There was significant difference in the tumor size (p=0.003) and tumor grade (p=0.001) in patients with TP and FN PET results. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that tumor size (< or =10 mm) and low tumor grade were independently associated with FN results. No significant relationship of FN PET results was found with age, menopausal status, tumor type, c-erbB-2, estrogen and progesterone receptors, sentinel lymph node or distant metastasis, parenchymal density and multifocality of primary breast tumor.

CONCLUSION

In present study, tumor size and tumor grade are independent factors that predict FDG-PET results. Smaller tumors (< or =10 mm) and low-grade tumors are strong predictor of FN FDG-PET results.

The role of FDG-PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer is crucial to selection of the most appropriate therapy. The current study evaluated the role of FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent breast cancer in patients who presented with elevated serum tumor markers.

METHODS

Forty-seven consecutive FDG-PET/CT studies of 46 women (aged 32-79 years; mean, 59.9 years) with a history of breast cancer presented with elevated serum tumor markers 1-21 years (mean = 6.2 years) after their initial diagnosis and were retrospectively evaluated. PET/CT results were confirmed by pathology (n = 11), further imaging, and follow-up (mean = 17.2 months; n = 36). Changes in further management based on PET/CT were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty (65%) patients had tumor recurrence, and 16 (35%) patients showed no further evidence of disease. Thirty-one patients had 32 abnormal PET/CT studies, and 15 patients had normal studies with an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 90%, 71%, and 83%, respectively. In 37 patients, PET/CT was compared with contrast-enhanced CT and had a higher sensitivity (85% vs 70%), specificity (76% vs 47%), and accuracy (81% vs 59%). PET/CT had an impact on the management of 24 (5l%) patients. Of these, chemotherapy or radiotherapy was started in 16 patients, treatment was modified in 2 patients, and 6 patients were referred to biopsy, followed by referral to surgery for 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with breast cancer and rising tumor markers, FDG-PET/CT had high performance indices and was superior to CT for diagnosis of tumor recurrence, which led to changes in the subsequent clinical management of 51% of these patients.

Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

High-resolution positron-emission mammography (PEM) is a new device, which allows the imaging of breast tissue. A prospective study was performed to assess the accuracy of PEM in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In a prospective multicenter study, 44 women with confirmed breast cancers were imaged with a high-resolution PEM scanner (Naviscan PET Systems, Rockville, MD) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. The images were blindly evaluated and were compared with final pathology.

RESULTS

The majority of the index lesions were seen on PEM (89%, 39/44). PEM detected 4 of 5 incidental breast cancers, 3 of which were not seen by any other imaging modalities. Of 19 patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery, PEM correctly predicted 6 of 8 (75%) patients with positive margins and 100% (11/11) with negative margins.

CONCLUSION

The current PEM device shows promise in detecting breast malignancies and may assist in the planning of adequate partial mastectomy procedures to better ensure negative margins.