Retrospective study of technical aspects and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum

Current opinions for endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors from our experiences: indications, technical aspects and complications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was first applied in the resection of large colorectal tumors 10 years ago. Frequent complications and technical difficulties were serious problems at first, but were gradually improved with experience. Here, we describe the indications, technical aspects and management of complications of ESD for colorectal tumors. In 2009, we introduce the use of small tip insulation-tipped diathermic (IT) knife. Features separating it from the IT knife and IT Knife2 are a smaller ceramic tip and small round disk at the root of the tip. During submucosal dissection, the small tip IT knife could dissect large pieces of tissue intact. This allows us to shorten the procedure time, particularly the submucosal dissection component. A total of 146 ESD for 140 patients were performed between January 2009 and July 2011. En bloc, and en bloc and R0 resection rates were 92.5% and 83.6%, respectively. Median procedural time was 48.5 min for 40.5 mm specimens. Perforation and delayed bleeding occurred in 2.1% and 1.4%, respectively. We successfully performed ESD for colorectal tumors with a shortened procedure time while preserving quality and safety.

Clinical outcomes of 200 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an outstanding endoscopic technique in which a colonic lesion can be resected en-bloc. However, the procedure requires a high level of skill and the procedure has yet to be standardized. At the present time, colorectal ESD is only permitted in Japanese institutions that have been certified for advanced medical treatments.

METHODS

We examined 200 cases of colorectal ESD that were performed in our hospital.

RESULTS

Over time, it was found that there was a continuous improvement in the treatment outcomes along with advances in both the procedures and the peripheral equipment utilized.

CONCLUSION

Current results suggest that the colorectal ESD procedure is relatively stable. To ensure colorectal ESD continues to be safe, indications for its use need to be more fully investigated and medical personnel must be trained to carefully perform the procedure.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for removal of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: A technical review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now the most common endoscopic treatment in Japan for intramucosal gastrointestinal neoplasms (non-metastatic). ESD is an invasive endoscopic surgical procedure, requiring extensive knowledge, skill, and specialized equipment. ESD starts with evaluation of the lesion, as accurate assessment of the depth and margin of the lesion is essential. The devices and strategies used in ESD vary, depending on the nature of the lesion. Prior to the procedure, the operator must be knowledgeable about the treatment strategy(ies), the device(s) to use, the electrocautery machine settings, the substances to inject, and other aspects. In addition, the operator must be able to manage complications, should they arise, including immediate recognition of the complication(s) and its treatment. Finally, in case the ESD treatment is not successful, the operator should be prepared to apply alternative treatments. Thus, adequate knowledge and training are essential to successfully perform ESD.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for laterally spreading tumors larger than 20 mm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colorectal laterally spreading tumors (LST) > 20 mm are usually treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR) is sometimes required. The aim of our study was to compare the outcomes of ESD and EMR, including EPMR, for such LST.

METHODS

A total of 269 consecutive patients with a colorectal LST > 20 mm were treated endoscopically at our hospital from April 2006 to December 2009. We retrospectively evaluated the complications and local recurrence rates associated with ESD, hybrid ESD (ESD with EMR), EMR, and EPMR.

RESULTS

ESD and EMR were performed successfully for 89 and 178 LST, respectively: 61 by ESD; 28 by hybrid ESD; 70 by EMR; and 108 by EPMR. Between-group differences in perforation rates were not significant. Local recurrence rates in cases with curative resection were as follows: 0% (0/56) in ESD; 0% (0/27) in hybrid ESD; 1.4% (1/69) in EMR; and 12.1% (13/107) in EPMR; that is, significantly higher in EPMR. No metastasis was seen at follow up. The recurrence rate for EPMR yielding ≥ three pieces was significantly high (P < 0.001). All 14 local recurrent lesions were adenomas that were cured endoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

As for safety, ESD/hybrid ESD is equivalent to EMR/EPMR. ESD/hybrid ESD is a feasible technique for en bloc resection and showed no local recurrence. Although local recurrences associated with EMR/EPMR were seen, which were conducted based on our indication criteria, all local recurrences could obtain complete cure by additional endoscopic treatment.

Endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and beyond: full-layer resection for gastric cancer with nonexposure technique (CLEAN-NET)

Mucosal cancer in the gastrointestinal tract generally has low risk of lymph node metastasis. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are techniques of local excision of neoplasia confined to the mucosal layer. Specimens from EMR/ESD contribute to several diagnoses, and histologic results affect treatment decisions. A combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach to neoplasia with a nonexposure technique allows full-thickness resection of the stomach wall without exposing the gastric lumen to the peritoneal cavity, preventing cancer cell dissemination to the peritoneal cavity. This article reviews EMR/ESD and describes a new full-thickness resection method using the nonexposure technique (CLEAN-NET).

Learning curve associated with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for endoscopists experienced in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection requires a high level of skill and experience in therapeutic endoscopy because of the high risk of complications such as perforation and bleeding. Greater understanding of the procedural learning curve is required to standardize training and to achieve wider acceptance of this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and to clarify its learning curve for endoscopists.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes for consecutive patients with colorectal neoplasms who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection by 2 trainees under the guidance of experienced specialists.

SETTING

The study was performed at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

PATIENTS

Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections were performed for 101 consecutive patients with 102 colorectal neoplasms between April 2008 and December 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Procedure time, en bloc resection rate, completion rate, and complications were retrospectively compared between 4 training periods in which each trainee performed 10 endoscopic submucosal dissections per period and a final training period in which the trainees performed 10 to 12 endoscopic submucosal dissections to analyze the skill improvement with time.

RESULTS

The procedure time and en bloc resection rate were not significantly different among the training periods. However, the completion rates in the fourth (100%) and fifth (95.5%) training periods (≥ 31 cases/trainee) were significantly higher (P < .001) than those in the first (45%), second (70%), and third (80%) training periods (1-30 cases/trainee). Two cases of perforation occurred during the study.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include the single-center design. Training programs and instruments vary with institution, which could affect the learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Trainee endoscopists are able to perform colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection without serious complications under the guidance of experienced specialists. They can perform it safely and independently after preparatory training and experience with ≥ 30 cases.