Saccadic reaction times in patients with frontal and parietal lesions

Temporal isolation of the neural correlates of spatial mnemonic processing with fMRI

The use of cognitive subtraction to study the neural substrates of the maintenance component of spatial working memory in humans relies upon the assumptions of the pure insertion of cognitive processes and a linear transform of neural activity to neuroimaging signal. Here, functional changes attributable to the memory requiring phase (referred to as the retention delay) of a spatial working memory task were temporally discriminated from those attributable to other behavioral subcomponents within trials using an experimental design that is argued to obviate these assumptions, as well as permit a joint test of their validity. The hypothesis that the assumptions of cognitive subtraction (as applied to neuroimaging) hold in general was not supported. Functional changes attributable to the retention delay were detected in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as well as in other cortical regions in a subset of the subjects, and in the right frontal eye field and right superior parietal lobule of all subjects (n=5). These results support models in which these regions are involved in maintaining spatial representations in humans. In addition, nearly all regions that evidenced such functional changes during the retention delay also evidenced functional changes during behaviors that did not require spatial working memory. This result tends to dispute models which posit the existence of gross neuroanatomical regions involved in solely mnemonic function.

The analysis of saccadic eye movements from gap and overlap paradigms

This protocol describes the acquisition and evaluation of saccadic eye movement data for use in basic neuroscience research and clinical application. The experimental protocol requires the subject to make saccadic eye movements in response to visual stimuli presented, in random order, on consecutive trials. The gap and overlap paradigms are described together with the instruction to generate pro- or antisaccades. The protocol includes the description of saccade detection, the determination of the beginning, the end, the size, and the velocity of a saccade, the exact way of calculating the proportion of different kinds of trials, and the treatment of erratic or artifact trials. Relevant variables are defined. The results obtained from a large number (300) of subjects of different ages (8-65 years) are described and analysed with respect to their development with age. The protocol allows to test a subject's saccadic status in many different circumstances in particular with respect to diagnostic help in neurology, psychiatry and psychology.

Saccadic reaction times: a statistical analysis of multimodal distributions

The distributions of saccadic reaction times (SRT) often deviate from unimodal normal distributions. An excess-mass procedure was used to detect peaks in 963 data sets containing 90,927 reaction times from 170 subjects. About 55% showed one, 30% two, 12% three and 3% four peaks. According to their clustering along the reaction time scale the modes could be classified into express (90-120 msec), fast regular (135-170 msec) and slow regular (200-220 msec) modes. Among the unimodal distributions 29% had peaks in the range of the express mode and 46% had peaks in the range of the fast regular mode. Therefore, 87% of the data sets support the notion of saccadic reaction time distributions being the superposition of three modes. All experimental distributions were fitted by as many gamma distributions as determined by the excess-mass test. The significance of the multimodality for saccade generation processes is discussed.

Saccades in Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome

Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome (GTS) is presumed to be an inherited disorder with an unclear pathophysiology. An involvement of the basal ganglia is suspected. Besides vocal tics, one of the main symptoms is the presence of motor tics. As eye movements are a specialized part of the motor system, we investigated whether they differed in some typical way in GTS patients. To study the control of saccades in GTS, different paradigms were used to elicit saccades, which were either externally triggered and visually guided or internally triggered and without visual target. GTS patients (n = 10) showed a significant increase of the latency of antisaccades, a highly impaired performance of sequences of memory-guided saccades, and an isolated reduction of the peak velocity in the antisaccades. Overall the results were similar to those found with similar paradigms in patients with Huntington's disease (HD). In analogy to the known pathology of HD, these findings can be attributed to ascending loops from the basal ganglia that inappropriately activate the frontal cortex, especially some of the eye movement-related areas there. This impairment seems to be a rather specific effect, since some oculomotor features that are preserved by structures of the frontal cortex, such as the effect of a fixation target on saccadic latency ("gap effect"), were normal.

Suppression of task-related saccades by electrical stimulation in the primate's frontal eye field

Patients with frontal lobe damage have difficulty suppressing reflexive saccades to salient visual stimuli, indicating that frontal lobe neocortex helps to suppress saccades as well as to produce them. In the present study, a role for the frontal eye field (FEF) in suppressing saccades was demonstrated in macaque monkeys by application of intracortical microstimulation during the performance of a visually guided saccade task, a memory prosaccade task, and a memory antisaccade task. A train of low-intensity (20-50 microA) electrical pulses was applied simultaneously with the disappearance of a central fixation target, which was always the cue to initiate a saccade. Trials with and without stimulation were compared, and significantly longer saccade latencies on stimulation trials were considered evidence of suppression. Low-intensity stimulation suppressed task-related saccades at 30 of 77 sites tested. In many cases saccades were suppressed throughout the microstimulation period (usually 450 ms) and then executed shortly after the train ended. Memory-guided saccades were most dramatically suppressed and were often rendered hypometric, whereas visually guided saccades were less severely suppressed by stimulation. At 18 FEF sites, the suppression of saccades was the only observable effect of electrical stimulation. Contraversive saccades were usually more strongly suppressed than ipsiversive ones, and cells recorded at such purely suppressive sites commonly had either foveal receptive fields or postsaccadic responses. At 12 other FEF sites at which saccadic eye movements were elicited at low thresholds, task-related saccades whose vectors differed from that of the electrically elicited saccade were suppressed by electrical stimulation. Such suppression at saccade sites was observed even with currents below the threshold for eliciting saccades. Pure suppression sites tended to be located near or in the fundus, deeper in the anterior bank of the arcuate than elicited saccade sites. Stimulation in the prefrontal association cortex anterior to FEF did not suppress saccades, nor did stimulation in premotor cortex posterior to FEF. These findings indicate that the primate FEF can help orchestrate saccadic eye movements by suppressing inappropriate saccade vectors as well as by selecting, specifying, and triggering appropriate saccades. We hypothesize that saccades could be suppressed both through local FEF interactions and through FEF projections to subcortical regions involved in maintaining fixation.

Eye position effects in monkey cortex. I. Visual and pursuit-related activity in extrastriate areas MT and MST

We studied the effect of eye position on visual and pursuit-related activity in neurons in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. Altogether, 109 neurons from the middle temporal area (area MT) and the medial superior temporal area (area MST) were tested for influence of eye position on their stimulus-driven response in a fixation paradigm. In this paradigm the monitored eye position signal was superimposed onto the stimulus control signal while the monkey fixated at different locations on a screen. This setup guaranteed that an optimized stimulus was moved across the receptive field at the same retinal location for all fixation locations. For 61% of the MT neurons and 82% of the MST neurons the stimulus-induced response was modulated by the position of the eyes in the orbit. Directional selectivity was not influenced by eye position. One hundred sixty-eight neurons exhibited direction-specific responses during smooth tracking eye movements and were tested in a pursuit paradigm. Here the monkey had to track a target that started to move in the preferred direction with constant speed from five different locations on the screen in random order. Pursuit-related activity was modulated by eye position in 78% of the MT neurons as well as in 80% of the MST neurons tested. Neuronal activity varied linearly as a function of both horizontal and vertical eye position for most of the neurons tested in both areas, i.e., two-dimensional regression planes could be approximated to the responses of most of the neurons. The directions of the gradients of these regression planes correlated neither with the preferred stimulus direction tested in the fixation paradigm nor with the preferred tracking direction in the pursuit paradigm. Eighty-six neurons were tested with both the fixation and the pursuit paradigms. The directions of the gradients of the regression planes fit to the responses in both paradigms tended to correlate with each other, i.e., for more than two thirds of the neurons the angular difference between both directions was less than +/-90 degrees. The modulatory effect of the position of the eyes in the orbit proved to balance out at the population level for neurons in areas MT and MST, tested with the fixation as well as the pursuit paradigm. Results are discussed in light of the hypothesis of an ongoing coordinate transformation of the incoming sensory signals into a nonretinocentric representation of the visual field.

Presaccadic attention allocation and express saccades

Express saccades are visually-guided saccades that are characterized by an extremely short latency of about 100 ms. The present experiments tested the hypothesis that a disengagement of visual attention is necessary for the generation of express saccades. All subjects produced large numbers of express saccades in the gap paradigm, in which the fixation stimulus is removed 200 ms before target onset (Exp. 1), but not in the overlap paradigm, in which the fixation stimulus remained on during the entire trial (Exp. 2). By means of peripheral cues (Exps. 3-5) and central cues (Exps. 6-7), visual attention was directed at the target location for the saccade before the actual appearance of the saccade target. In all experiments, the location cues facilitated rather than abolished express saccades. The generation of express saccades was facilitated even when the currently fixated visual stimulus was not removed before target onset (fixation-overlap; Exps. 5-7). The results are explained by the hypothesis that a disengagement of a separate fixation system is necessary for the generation of express saccades, a hypothesis that is in line with current neurobiological findings.

The ability to produce express saccades as a function of gap interval among schizophrenia patients

The ability to produce "express saccades" is associated with adequate functioning of saccadic burst cells in the superior colliculus. Saccadic burst cells appear to be under the inhibitory control of both the collicular and the dorsolateral frontal fixation systems. Twenty schizophrenia patients and 20 nonpsychiatric subjects were presented a saccade task that included five different gap intervals (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 ms) between fixation point offset and peripheral target onset (at +/-4 degrees). All subjects generated the highest frequency of express saccades in trials with a gap interval of 200 ms. Schizophrenia patients had an increased frequency of express saccades across gap intervals, especially for targets presented in the right visual field. The groups did not differ in the percentages of anticipatory saccades or saccadic amplitudes. These results suggest that schizophrenia patients' saccadic burst cells in the superior colliculus are functioning adequately, but may be consistent with dysfunction of dorsolateral frontal cortex and/or its interconnecting subcortical circuitry.

Cortical potentials with antisaccades

The term antisaccade refers to saccades that are performed towards the side opposite to that of target appearance. The performance of antisaccades is considered to be determined by intact frontal inhibitory areas as patients with frontal, and especially prefrontal, lesions show a striking impairment in suppressing an unwanted protarget saccade. We recorded cortical slow potentials from subjects performing saccades and antisaccades in a task, antitask and no move conditions in order to investigate possible topographic differences between these two types of eye movement. Our main findings concern both movement related as well as sensory related potentials. With regard to the saccadic potentials, performance of an antisaccade is preceded by a much more pronounced activity during the last 100 ms prior to the eye movement onset over central-anterior leads with a slight ipsilateral lateralization. As for the sensory potentials, the target related with antisaccade performance is followed by smaller, but nonstatistically significant, exogenous responses while at 300-350 ms after target appearance, the activity associated with the antisaccade's target is clearly larger over central midline leads. Although we could not precisely relate the electrical activity obtained with well circumscribed cortical function, the results support the view that the anterior and slightly ipsilateral cortical activation which precedes the performance of an antisaccade could reflect the frontal mechanisms of suppression of the unwanted saccade.

Timing and amplitude of saccades during predictive saccadic tracking in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia patients have ocular motor abnormalities. It has been hypothesized that these abnormalities are associated with frontal eye field pathology. If so, schizophrenia patients should have difficulties decreasing saccadic reaction times in response to predictably moving targets. To evaluate the frontal eye field hypothesis, 25 schizophrenic and 26 nonpsychiatric subjects completed predictive saccadic tracking tasks. The groups demonstrated equivalent decreases in saccadic reaction times over consecutive trials. Schizophrenia patients, however, had faster reaction times and shorter amplitude saccades than nonpsychiatric subjects. The shorter amplitude saccades were made regardless of reaction time, perhaps an antipsychotic medication effect. The reaction time results are unlikely to be an effect of treatment with antipsychotic medication and are inconsistent with the hypothesis that schizophrenia patients have frontal eye field pathology.

Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects

Five human subjects were trained in a single target gap saccade task (fixation point offset precedes target onset, target presentation random at 4 deg to the left or right of the fixation point). Four of them produced different distributions of saccadic reaction times (SRT) for left vs right directed saccades. These asymmetries consisted mostly in different numbers of express saccades, which the subjects produced to the left and to the right side. Using different gap durations (0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 msec) and an overlap task, we found a systematic modulation of the frequency of express saccades: for the shortest and longest gap durations, and in the overlap task, express saccades tended to decline. As a consequence of this effect asymmetric SRTs became rather symmetric for these gap durations. In a gap task where the central fixation point was replaced by a peripheral attention target the occurrence of express saccades was strongly modulated by the location of the attention target relative to the saccade target: for all subjects the frequency of express saccades decreased when the saccade target occurred in the close vicinity of the peripheral attention target. This effect resulted again in clear modifications of the observed asymmetries. We suggest that the occurrence of express saccades can be influenced in a dynamic way by the permanent allocation of the subject's visual attention. Moreover, the phenomenon of direction asymmetry in the SRT distributions can be modulated by such manipulations of the attentional focus.

The effects of visual scene composition on the latency of saccadic eye movements of the rhesus monkey

This study examined how variations in the visual scene affect the generation of bimodal saccadic latency distributions, the first mode of which is called the population of "express saccades". The surface media used to make stimuli visible and the composition of the background were varied to determine the conditions under which express saccades can be generated in rhesus monkeys. The results show that express saccades to singly presented targets can readily be elicited when the stimuli are made visible by virtue of either luminance contrast, color contrast or motion cues. Express saccades are rarely obtained when stimuli are made visible by virtue of only stereoscopic depth or texture cues. Express saccades can, however, be elicited using random-dot stereograms or textures when luminance or chrominance information is added to the target. When single target stimuli are presented simultaneously with a set of non-target stimuli, express saccades are for the most part prevented unless either the non-target stimuli are near threshold or their numerosity is very high, in which case they form a texture-like array. However, when the non-target stimuli are continuously present in the display, express saccades reemerge. These findings suggest that express saccades are not unique to experimental situations in which only a single stimulus appears on an otherwise homogeneous surface; they can readily be generated as long as the target stimulus is made visible by virtue of luminance, chrominance, motion or a combination of more than one surface medium and as long as the target does not appear concurrently with a salient group of other non-target stimuli.

Saccadic eye movements of dyslexic and normal reading children

Twenty-four children made saccades in five noncognitive tasks. Two standard tasks required saccades to a single target presented randomly 4 deg to the right or left of a fixation point. Three other tasks required sequential saccades from the left to the right. 75 parameters of the eye-movement data were collected for each child. On the basis of their reading, writing, and other cognitive performances, twelve children were considered dyslexic and were divided into two groups (D1 and D2). Group statistical comparisons revealed significant differences between control and dyslexic subjects. In general, in the standard tasks the dyslexic subjects had poorer fixation quality, failed more often to hit the target at once, had smaller primary saccades, and had shorter reaction times to the left as compared with the control group. The control group and group D1 dyslexics showed an asymmetrical distribution of reaction times, but in opposite directions. Group D2 dyslexics made more anticipatory and express saccades, they undershot the target more often in comparison with the control group, and almost never overshot it. In the sequential tasks group D1 subjects made fewer and larger saccades in a shorter time and group D2 subjects had shorter fixation durations than the subjects of the control group.