KEY ISSUES IN ADVANCED BLEEDING CARE IN TRAUMA

Koagulopathie

Coagulopathy after trauma is a major cause for uncontrolled hemorrhage in trauma victims. Approximately 40% of trauma related deaths are attributed to or caused by exsanguination. Therefore the prevention of coagulopathy is regarded as the leading cause of avoidable death in these patients. Massive hemorrhage after trauma is usually caused by a combination of surgical and coagulopathic bleeding. Coagulopathic bleeding is multifactorial, including dilution and consumption of both platelets and coagulation factors, as well as dysfunction of the coagulation system. Because of the high mortality associated with hypothermia, acidosis and progressive coagulopathy, this vicious circle is often referred to as the lethal triad, potentially leading to exsanguination. To overcome this coagulopahty-related bleeding an empiric therapy is often instituted by replacing blood components. However, the use of transfusion of red blood cells has been shown to be associated with post-injury infection and multiple organ failure. In the management of mass bleeding it is therefore crucial to have a clear strategy to prevent coagulopathy and to minimize the need for blood transfusion.

Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based recommendations can be made with respect to many aspects of the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient, which when implemented may lead to improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was formed in 2005 with the aim of developing guidelines for the management of bleeding following severe injury. Recommendations were formulated using a nominal group process and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) hierarchy of evidence and were based on a systematic review of published literature.

RESULTS

Key recommendations include the following: The time elapsed between injury and operation should be minimised for patients in need of urgent surgical bleeding control, and patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an identified source of bleeding should undergo immediate surgical bleeding control unless initial resuscitation measures are successful. A damage control surgical approach is essential in the severely injured patient. Pelvic ring disruptions should be closed and stabilised, followed by appropriate angiographic embolisation or surgical bleeding control, including packing. Patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an unidentified source of bleeding should undergo immediate further assessment as appropriate using focused sonography, computed tomography, serum lactate, and/or base deficit measurements. This guideline also reviews appropriate physiological targets and suggested use and dosing of blood products, pharmacological agents, and coagulation factor replacement in the bleeding trauma patient.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of the bleeding trauma patient will help create circumstances in which optimal care can be provided. By their very nature, these guidelines reflect the current state-of-the-art and will need to be updated and revised as important new evidence becomes available.