Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:64-101. [PMID: 20052816 DOI: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181c15c70]

Chronic Pain and Chronic Opioid Use After Intensive Care Discharge - Is It Time to Change Practice?

Almost half of patients treated on intensive care unit (ICU) experience moderate to severe pain. Managing pain in the critically ill patient is challenging, as their pain is complex with multiple causes. Pharmacological treatment often focuses on opioids, and over a prolonged admission this can represent high cumulative doses which risk opioid dependence at discharge. Despite analgesia the incidence of chronic pain after treatment on ICU is high ranging from 33-73%. Measures need to be taken to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain, whilst avoiding opioid overuse. This narrative review discusses preventive measures for the development of chronic pain in ICU patients. It considers a number of strategies that can be employed including non-opioid analgesics, regional analgesia, and non-pharmacological methods. We reason that individualized pain management plans should become the cornerstone for critically ill patients to facilitate physical and psychological well being after discharge from critical care and hospital.

Evidence review conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for gynecologic (GYN) surgery are increasingly being reported and may be associated with superior outcomes, reduced length of hospital stay, and cost savings. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in partnership with the American College of Surgeons and the Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, has developed the Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery, which is a nationwide initiative to disseminate best practices in perioperative care to more than 750 hospitals across five major surgical service lines in a 5-year period. The program is designed to identify evidence-based process measures shown to prevent healthcare-associated conditions and hasten recovery after surgery, integrate those into a comprehensive service line-based pathway, and assist hospitals in program implementation. In conjunction with this effort, we have conducted an evidence review of the various anesthesia components which may influence outcomes and facilitate recovery after GYN surgery. A literature search was performed for each intervention, and the highest levels of available evidence were considered. Anesthesiology-related interventions for preoperative (carbohydrate loading/fasting, multimodal preanesthetic medications), intraoperative (standardized intraoperative pathway, regional anesthesia, protective ventilation strategies, fluid minimization) and postoperative (multimodal analgesia) phases of care are included. We have summarized the best available evidence to recommend the anesthetic components of care for ERAS for GYN surgery.

Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in American hospitalized pregnant women undergoing cesarean section

Background Pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading preventable cause of maternal mortality in the United States; however, American guidelines for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis remain less aggressive than other developed countries. The Safe Motherhood Initiative (SMI) combines aspects of American and international guidelines to increase utilization of prophylaxis and thereby decrease incidence of pregnancy-related VTE. Objectives To evaluate the prescribing and administration rates of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for women undergoing cesarean section (c-section) when retrospectively applying the SMI recommendations. Setting Large academic medical center in Sacramento, California, USA. Method This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of pregnant women undergoing c-section who would have met criteria for pharmacologic prophylaxis according to the SMI. Main outcome measures Prescribing and administration rates of mechanical and pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included incidence of thromboembolism within 6 weeks after c-section and thromboembolic associated mortality. Results A total of 616 charts were analyzed. When applying the SMI guidelines for VTE prophylaxis, the prescribing rates for mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis were 94.3% and 4.71% of patients, respectively, and 94.9% of ordered pharmacologic prophylaxis doses were administered. The incidence of 6-week post-partum VTE was 0.49%. There were no cases of VTE-associated mortality. Conclusion This study demonstrated that a large population of c-section patients fit the SMI criteria for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis but did not receive it. We observed a 0.49% rate of VTE, which was slightly higher than the nationally reported average rate of 0.3%. With growing rates of pregnancy-associated VTE in the United States, perhaps a more aggressive guideline is warranted.

'SCALD-ED' Block: Superficial Cutaneous Anesthesia in a Lateral Leg Distribution within the Emergency Department - A Case Series

BACKGROUND

In the midst of a nationwide opioid epidemic, focus has been placed on identifying and utilizing safe, effective opioid-free analgesic alternatives. Lower-extremity peripheral nerve blockades are common and often involve both motor and sensory anesthesia, resulting in leg weakness and ambulatory difficulty. The aim of this case report is to describe an ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block technique (superficial cutaneous anesthesia in a lateral (leg) distribution within the emergency department ['SCALD-ED' block]) that provides motor-sparing, purely sensory anesthesia after a superficial injury to the lateral leg in patients presenting to the emergency department.

DISCUSSION

Two separate patients presenting with lateral leg pain after superficial injury (burn, cellulitis) reported continued breakthrough pain despite a standard analgesic modality of combination acetaminophen and ibuprofen. With the patient placed in prone position for ultrasound-guided access to lower-extremity nerve branches, the lateral sural cutaneous nerve (LSCN) was identified by tracing its pathway from the proximal sciatic nerve to the common peroneal (fibular) nerve to the superficial peroneal (fibular) nerve. Five mL of lidocaine (1%, with epinephrine) was injected along the superficial LSCN route for anesthetic blockade. Temporal assessments of anesthetic effect and pain improvement, and monitoring of motor or ambulatory impairment were conducted at regular intervals to assess the efficacy and feasibility of the blockade. Regional anesthesia along the LSCN sensory distribution was experienced at 7-9 min post blockade. Peak analgesic effect was experienced at 25-29 min. The duration of anesthesia was 120-150 min. A negligible amount of delayed sensory anesthesia was noted along the distal sural nerve distribution. No motor deficit, ambulatory difficulty, or adverse effects were experienced in either patient post blockade.

CONCLUSION

The LSCN is an identifiable target under ultrasound guidance, susceptible to localized, purely sensory blockade of pain from superficial cutaneous lateral leg injuries.

Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in maternal anticoagulation therapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in parturients with anticoagulation therapy undergoing cesarean section.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled study conducted in 239 parturients using anticoagulants and undergoing selective cesarean section. 37 parturients withdrew, and finally parturients received spinal anesthesia using 27gauge pen type fine spinal needles (experimental group, n = 110) and 22gauge traditional spinal needles (control group, n = 92). The primary efficacy outcomes included low back pain (LBP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after delivery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale during subarachnoid puncture (VASdural), difference between visual analogue scale (VAS) during peripheral venipuncture and VASdural (∆VAS), VAS of back puncture point 24, 48 and 72 h after operation (VASdural-24 h, VASdural-48 h and VASdural-72 h, respectively), maternal satisfaction and hospitalization stay.

RESULTS

No parturient had PDPH and was suspected with spinal or intracranial haematoma in two groups. There was no significant difference in VASlbp-24 h, VASlbp-48 h and VASlbp-72 h (P = 0.056; P = 0.813; P = 0.189, respectively) between two groups. In experimental group, VASdural (P = 0.017), ∆VAS (P = 0.001) and VASdural-24 h (P < 0.0001) were lower, whereas maternal satisfaction was higher (P = 0.046). There was no significant difference in VASdural-48 h, VASdural-72 h, urination function, strength recovery and hospitalization stay (P = 0.069; P = 0.667; P = 0.105; P = 0.133; P = 0.754, respectively) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia provided lower VASdural, VASdrual-24 h and a higher maternal satisfaction. Hence, it is considered as a safe, reliable and reasonable option for cesarean section parturients during maternal anticoagulation therapy with normal platelet count and coagulation time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov at November 11th, 2016 ( NCT02987192 ).

Interventional Anesthetic Methods for Pain in Hematology/Oncology Patients

This article reviews anesthetic interventional approaches to the management of pain in hematology and oncology patients. It includes a discussion of single interventions including peripheral nerve blocks, plexus injections, and sympathetic nerve neurolysis, and continuous infusion therapy through implantable devices, such as intrathecal pumps, epidural port-a-caths, and tunneled catheters. The primary objective is to inform members of hematology and oncology care teams regarding the variety of interventional options for patients with cancer-related pain for whom medical pain management methods have not been effective.

Preoperative Anesthetic Considerations in the Podiatric Surgical Candidate

There are multiple challenges the podiatric surgeon faces while attempting to treat patients in the perioperative setting. Given the aging and increasingly complex surgical population, preoperative evaluation is of utmost importance to mitigate unnecessary risks and to optimize patient outcomes. This article reviews key preoperative considerations, patient evaluation, and factors affecting selection of anesthetic technique.

Hospital-, Anesthesiologist-, and Patient-level Variation in Primary Anesthesia Type for Hip Fracture Surgery

Editor’s Perspective

What We Already Know about This Topic

What This Manuscript Tells Us That Is New

Background

Substantial variation in primary anesthesia type for hip fracture surgery exists. Previous work has demonstrated that patients cared for at hospitals using less than 20 to 25% neuraxial anesthesia have decreased survival. Therefore, the authors aimed to identify sources of variation in anesthesia type, considering patient-, anesthesiologist-, and hospital-level variables.

Methods

Following protocol registration (NCT02787031), the authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort using linked administrative data in Ontario, Canada. The authors identified all people greater than 65 yr of age who had emergency hip fracture surgery from April 2002 to March 2014. Generalized linear mixed models were used to account for hierarchal data and measure the adjusted association of hospital-, anesthesiologist-, and patient-level factors with neuraxial anesthesia use. The proportion of variation attributable to each level was estimated using variance partition coefficients and the median odds ratio for receipt of neuraxial anesthesia.

Results

Of 107,317 patients, 57,080 (53.2%) had a neuraxial anesthetic. The median odds ratio for receiving neuraxial anesthesia was 2.36 between randomly selected hospitals and 2.36 between randomly selected anesthesiologists. The majority (60.1%) of variation in neuraxial anesthesia use was explained by patient factors; 19.9% was attributable to the anesthesiologist providing care and 20.0% to the hospital where surgery occurred. The strongest patient-level predictors were absence of preoperative anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, absence of obesity, and presence of pulmonary disease.

Conclusions

While patient factors explain most of the variation in neuraxial anesthesia use for hip fracture surgery, 40% of variation is attributable to anesthesiologist and hospital-level practice. Efforts to change practice patterns will need to consider hospital-level processes and anesthesiologists’ intentions and behaviors.

A Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Principles Used for Scheduled Caesarean Delivery

There is an increasing body of evidence to support the success of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for a wide range of surgical procedures. There has been little formalized application, however, of ERAS principles in obstetrical surgery. The aim of this review was to examine the evidence base of perioperative care for patients undergoing Caesarean delivery (CD) and to determine the feasibility of developing an ERAS Society guideline for this obstetrical care plan. The literature on enhanced recovery programs was reviewed, including fast-track surgery and perioperative care components in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of CD. These studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, non-RCT studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, reviews, and case studies. This is not a systematic review because each ERAS topic area would require a new question. Certain ERAS elements have the potential to benefit patients undergoing CD. These elements include patient education, preoperative optimization, prophylaxis against thromboembolism, antimicrobial prophylaxis, postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention, hypothermia prevention, perioperative fluid management, postoperative analgesia, ileus prevention, breastfeeding promotion, and early mobilization. ERAS has the potential to be successfully implemented in CD on the basis of the evidence obtained from this review. Knowledge transfer and implementation will require multidisciplinary coordination in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases and the development of a formalized ERAS guideline.

Preoperative Assessment of the Pregnant Patient Undergoing Nonobstetric Surgery

The anesthetic management of pregnant patients can present a variety of challenges and a thorough preoperative assessment is necessary before initiating any anesthetic services. Both the mother and the fetus need to be considered when formulating an anesthetic plan and discussing informed consent. The overall aims in assessing a pregnant patient are to identity potential issues that can lead to catastrophic complications, provide adequate information allowing the mother to make informed decisions, and to obtain knowledge for tailoring an anesthetic that maintains maternal and fetal homeostasis.

Periprocedural Considerations for Anticoagulated Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Periprocedural patient instruction and coordination is an important piece in achieving safe outcomes for patients needing procedures and receiving anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Balancing the needs for anticoagulation versus bleeding during the procedure requires clinical reasoning and preparation. In this article, the current guidelines for use of anticoagulants with atrial fibrillation, the relevant pharmacology, and the use of standardized tools to quantify the risks of thrombus or bleeding in the procedures will be discussed. In addition, resources for examining the optimal practice for these case types will be provided. Perianesthesia health care providers are pivotal to lead relevant stakeholders in the perianesthesia setting work together to create protocols and individual plans of care for this patient population.

Thromboprophylaxis in Pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Identifying women who are at greatest risk for venous thromboembolism, and managing their pregnancies with appropriate thromboprophylaxis is essential to decreasing this life-threatening condition. Those at greatest risk are patients with thrombophilias, a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and those undergoing cesarean delivery. Current international guidelines on thromboprophylaxis vary in details, but all strategies rely on risk factor identification and thromboprophylaxis for the highest risk patients. All guidelines require clinicians to think critically about individual patient's risk factors throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Blood management in total knee arthroplasty: state-of-the-art review

Total blood loss from primary total knee arthroplasty may exceed 2 L with greater blood loss during revision procedures. Blood loss and allogeneic transfusion are strongly associated with adverse outcomes from surgery including postoperative mortality, thromboembolic events and infection. Strategies to reduce blood loss and transfusion rates improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Interventions are employed preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively. The strongest predictor for allogeneic blood transfusion is preoperative anaemia. Over 35% of patients are anaemic when scheduled for primary and revision knee arthroplasty, defined as haemoglobin <130 g/L for men and women, and the majority of cases are secondary to iron deficiency. Early identification and treatment of anaemia can reduce postoperative transfusions and complications. Anticoagulation must be carefully managed perioperatively to balance the risk of thromboembolic event versus the risk of haemorrhage. Intraoperatively, tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and is recommended for all knee arthroplasty surgery; however, the optimal route, dose or timing of administration remains uncertain. Cell salvage is a valuable adjunct to surgery with significant expected blood loss, such as revision knee arthroplasty. Autologous blood donation is not recommended in routine care, sealants may be beneficial in select cases but further evidence of benefit is required, and the use of a tourniquet remains at the discretion of the surgeon. Postoperatively, restrictive transfusion protocols should be followed with a transfusion threshold haemoglobin of 70 g/L, except in the presence of acute coronary syndrome. Recent studies report no allogeneic transfusions after primary knee arthroplasty surgery after employing blood conservation strategies. The current challenge is to select and integrate different blood conserving interventions to deliver an optimal patient pathway with a multidisciplinary approach.

Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia and Prophylactic Three Times Daily Unfractionated Heparin Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm. Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) presents a challenge to optimal VTE prophylaxis. Our primary aim was to characterize missed doses of VTE prophylaxis associated with epidural catheter placement and removal. Our secondary aim was to measure the effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway on the rate of TEA-associated missed VTE prophylaxis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of 1264 colorectal surgery patients at a single academic center. Missed preoperative doses between TEA patients and non-TEA patients were compared. Missed postoperative unfractionated heparin (UFH) doses associated with epidural removal were compared before and after implementation of an ERAS program. Other data collected included demographic data, surgical indication, and thrombohemorrhagic complications.

RESULTS

Of the 445 TEA patients, 12.6% missed their preoperative heparin doses compared with 8.4% of patients without epidurals (P = 0.017). Of the TEA patients prescribed 3 times daily UFH, 22.5% missed one or more doses associated with epidural removal. The percent of patients missing at least one dose of UFH on epidural removal dropped from 28.1% before ERAS to 17.9% after the ERAS program (P = 0.023). Seven patients developed VTEs. There were zero epidural hematomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with a 1.5-fold increased risk of missed dose of preoperative VTE prophylaxis, which was not affected by implementation of an ERAS program. The implementation of an ERAS program reduced missed doses associated with epidural removal. This study highlights the challenge posed by providing VTE prophylaxis in the setting of perioperative neuraxial analgesia.

Psoas Versus Femoral Blocks: A Registry Analysis of Risks and Benefits

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Psoas blocks are an alternative to femoral nerve blocks and have the potential advantage of blocking the entire lumbar plexus. However, the psoas muscle is located deeply, making psoas blocks more difficult than femoral blocks. In contrast, while femoral blocks are generally easy to perform, the inguinal region is prone to infection. We thus tested the hypothesis that psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications than femoral blocks but have fewer catheter-related infections.

METHODS

We extracted 22,434 surgical cases from the German Network for Regional Anesthesia registry (2007-2014) and grouped cases as psoas (n = 7593) and femoral (n = 14,841) blocks. Insertion-related complications (including single-shot blocks and catheter) and infectious complications (including only catheter) in each group were compared with χ tests. The groups were compared with multivariable logistic models, adjusted for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

After adjustment for potential confounding factors, psoas blocks were associated with more complications than femoral blocks including vascular puncture 6.3% versus 1.1%, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-4.6; P < 0.001), and multiple skin punctures 12.6% versus 7.7%, with an aOR of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.1-3.3; P <0.001). Psoas blocks were also associated with fewer catheter-related infections: 0.3% versus 0.9% (aOR of 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = 0.016), and with improved patient satisfaction (mean ± SD 0- to 10-point scale score, 9.6 ± 1.2 vs 8.4 ± 2.9; P < 0.001). Results from a propensity-matched sensitivity analysis were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Psoas blocks are associated with more insertion-related complications but fewer infectious complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ID NCT02846610.

Update on Selective Regional Analgesia for Hip Surgery Patients

In hip surgery, regional anesthesia offers benefits in pain management and recovery. There are a wide range of regional analgesic options; none have shown to be superior. Lumbar plexus block, femoral nerve block, and fascia iliaca block are the most supported by published literature. Other techniques, such as selective obturator and/or lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks, represent alternatives. Newer approaches, such as quadratus lumborum block and local infiltration analgesia, require rigorous studies. To realize long-term outcome benefits, postoperative regional analgesia must be tailored to the individual patient and last longer.

Periprocedural antithrombotic management for lumbar puncture: Association of British Neurologists clinical guideline

Lumbar puncture (LP) is an important and frequently performed invasive procedure for the diagnosis and management of neurological conditions. There is little in the neurological literature on the topic of periprocedural management of antithrombotics in patients undergoing LP. Current practice is therefore largely extrapolated from guidelines produced by anaesthetic bodies on neuraxial anaesthesia, haematology groups advising on periprocedural management of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and by neuroradiology on imaging-guided spinal procedures. This paper summarises the existing literature on the topic and offers recommendations to guide periprocedural antithrombotic management for LP, based on the consolidation of the best available evidence. ​

The Role of Computerized Clinical Decision Support in Reducing Inappropriate Medication Administration During Epidural Therapy

Background: The use of epidural anesthesia has been shown to improve outcomes in the postoperative setting. To minimize risk of complications, avoiding certain medications with epidural anesthesia is advised. Objective: This study sought to determine the role of a computerized clinical decision support module implemented into the computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system on the incidence of administration of medications known to increase complications with epidural anesthesia. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort chart review in adult patients receiving epidural anesthesia for at least 1 day. Patients were identified retrospectively and divided into 2 cohorts, those receiving an epidural 3 months prior to initiation of the module and those receiving an epidural 3 months following implementation. The primary end point was incidence of inappropriate medication administration before and after implementation. Complications of therapy were collected as secondary end points. Results: There was a reduction in the incidence of inappropriate medication administration in the postimplementation group versus the preimplementation group (6.3% vs 12.8%) although statistical significance was not achieved. In addition, the incidence of enoxaparin administration was significantly lower postimplementation than the preimplementation (0% vs 3.9%). There were no significant differences in other complications of therapy. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that application of decision support for this high-risk procedural population was able to eliminate the incidence of the most common inappropriate medication for epidural analgesia, enoxaparin. A reduction in incidence of other inappropriate medications was also observed; however, statistical significance was not reached. The use of computerized clinical decision support can be a powerful tool in reducing or ameliorating medication errors, and further study will be required to determine the most appropriate and effective implementation strategies.

Donor Hepatectomy Surgery using Ketamine to Compliment Analgesia and Reduce Morbidity - a Retrospective Chart Review Investigation

Objective

Inferior and limited analgesic options/techniques during living donor hepatectomy surgery can result in pain and risks of morbidity, opioid-related adverse events (AEs), predisposition to the development of chronic pain and concerns of potential narcotic abuse. Traditional analgesia uses unimodal intravenous opioids that can cause significant side effects. Ketamine provides analgesia and may be opioid sparing, but use in living-donor hepatectomy has not been studied.

Methods

Following human investigation committee approval and informed written consent, 47 liver donor patients over a 5-year period scheduled for surgery were categorized into one of three groups: 24 patients received no ketamine (Group 1), 9 received only intraoperative ketamine (Group 2) and 14 patients received intraoperative plus postoperative ketamine (Group 3). Subjects had access to opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Chart reviews (including operating room and intensive care unit) were collected and analysed for morphine consumption, pain-intensity scores, opioid-sparing effects, AEs of analgesics and for evidence of ketamine side effects on donor hepatectomy patients.

Results

There were no differences in patient demographics. Living donor hepatectomy patients receiving intraoperative ketamine that was continued postoperatively consumed fewer morphine-equivalents and had lower median pain scores than subjects from the other two groups. Ileus occurred in those not receiving ketamine, pruritus was lowest in Group 3, and there was no evidence or reports of ketamine-associated AEs.

Conclusion

Perioperative ketamine for donor hepatectomy patients could safely provide improved analgesia and be opioid sparing when compared to PCA opioids alone, and there is no evidence of ketamine-related AEs at the dose and delivery methods described here during partial liver donation surgery.

Epidural Hematoma: Vigilance beyond Guidelines

Coagulopathy either from the use of anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or thrombolytic medications or from underlying medical conditions is considered one of the major risk factors for epidural hematoma formation related to epidural catheter placement or removal. The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) has laid down guidelines regarding timing of neuraxial blockade or removal of neuraxial catheters in patients receiving either antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy. We present a case of acute onset of paraplegia because of an epidural hematoma following removal of the epidural catheter in a patient who was given the first dose of antithrombotic therapy after the removal of the epidural catheter as per the ASRA guidelines. The epidural hematoma was diagnosed with an urgent magnetic resonance imaging, and the patient was urgently taken up for surgical evacuation of the hematoma. The patient made full recovery over 1 week period.

Nerve root injection cancellations because of incomplete anticoagulation management

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography-guided steroid injection is a well-recognized, conservative treatment of localized spinal pain as a result of facet arthropathy and radiculopathy secondary to nerve root compression. An extremely rare complication is the development of an epidural haematoma with potential to cause permanent neurological damage, so anticoagulation at the time of procedure is contraindicated. Routinely injections are performed as an outpatient requiring the referring physician to implement a peri-procedural anticoagulation plan. Anecdotal experience suggested that cancellations were occurring as patients remained on anticoagulation at the time of their appointment. The authors therefore assessed the existing service against expected standards to identify the causes of cancellations and find ways to improve the service.

AIMS

This audit aimed to identify the incidence of cancelled computed tomography-guided nerve root injections secondary to incorrect peri-procedural anticoagulation management, develop an intervention to help reduce the incidence of cancellations and then re-audit to assess the effect of the intervention.

METHODS

The audit standard was that 100% of outpatients attending for computed tomography-guided nerve root and facet injections should have an appropriate anticoagulation plan implemented. Baseline data collection took place prospectively between 1 September and 30 November 2016. The study population was elective computed tomography-guided spinal nerve root and facet injections scheduled on the radiology information system at the authors' trust. Descriptive analysis was completed. The intervention involved a revised electronic request form being implemented with new compulsory fields concerning antiplatelets and anticoagulants. Re-audit post-intervention involved prospective data collection between 1 September and 30 November 2017 using the same methods.

RESULTS

Baseline audit found that of three out of 55 (5%) patients had cancellations. On re-audit, there were 0 cancellations out of 93 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The new request form prevented 5% of patients referred for computed tomography-guided nerve root injection being cancelled because of incorrect anticoagulation management. Extrapolated over the year the potential savings through preventing lost activity are £3445.56.

Enhanced recovery after surgery for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a review of the evidence

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols produce significant clinical and economic benefits in a range of surgical subspecialties. There is a long tradition of applying clinical pathways to the perioperative care of joint arthroplasty patients. Enhanced recovery after surgery represents the next step in the evolution of standardized care. To date, reports of full ERAS pathways for hip or knee arthroplasty are lacking. In this narrative review, we present the evidence base that can be usefully applied to constructing ERAS pathways for hip or knee arthroplasty. The history and rationale for applying ERAS to joint arthroplasty are explained. Evidence demonstrates improved outcomes after joint arthroplasty when a standardized approach to care is implemented. The efficacy of individual ERAS components in hip or knee replacement is considered, including preoperative education, intraoperative anaesthetic techniques, postoperative analgesia, and early mobilization after joint arthroplasty. Interventions lacking high-quality evidence are identified, together with recommendations for future research. Based on currently available evidence, we present a model ERAS pathway that can be applied to perioperative care of patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty.

National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Venous Thromboembolism

Obstetric venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Maternal death from thromboembolism is amenable to prevention, and thromboprophylaxis is the most readily implementable means of systematically reducing the maternal death rate. Observational data support the benefit of risk-factor-based prophylaxis in reducing obstetric thromboembolism. This bundle, developed by a multidisciplinary working group and published by the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care, supports routine thromboembolism risk assessment for obstetric patients, with appropriate use of pharmacologic and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity unit. The safety bundle is organized into 4 domains: Readiness, Recognition, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged.

Anesthetic Treatment of Cardiac Disease During Pregnancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the pathophysiology, peripartum treatment, and anesthetic management of parturients with cardiac disease. Valvular disease, coronary disease, and cardiomyopathy are specifically addressed in the context of the normal physiologic changes of pregnancy. We offer recommendations for anesthetic approaches, hemodynamic goals with an emphasis on interdisciplinary planning between anesthesiologists, cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, obstetricians, maternal fetal medicine specialists, and neonatologists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vaginal delivery with neuraxial analgesia can be well tolerated by many pregnant patients with cardiac disease when coordinated by an interdisciplinary team of experts. Cardiac disease in pregnancy can present a significant challenge for the interdisciplinary care team. A detailed understanding of each patient's cardiac pathology and the physiologic changes of pregnancy are critical to ensure a safe and successful labor and delivery. Optimized medical therapy in the peripartum period and neuraxial anesthesia with the judicious use of vasoactive agents can be of great benefit for these parturients. As is generally the case, cesarean delivery should be primarily reserved for obstetric indications and maternal wellbeing, with careful consideration of the fetus to guide best practices.

Regional Anesthesia in the Setting of Arm Replantation: A Case Report

The perioperative implementation of continuous peripheral nerve blocks is poorly described within the literature for replantation surgeries beyond digital replantation. The management of replantation patients presents a challenging balance between pain control and limb perfusion. We report the successful use of a continuous interscalene catheter in a therapeutically anticoagulated patient after midshaft humerus arm replantation. The benefits of the continuous peripheral nerve block for the patient included improved pain control and potentially improved limb perfusion making it a valuable component of this patient's treatment.

Epidural Analgesia and Subcutaneous Heparin 3 Times Daily in Cancer Patients With Acute Postoperative Pain

The use of epidural analgesia in conjunction with subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin 3 times per day could increase the risk of spinal epidural hematoma, but insufficient patient experience data exist to determine this. We retrospectively reviewed the incidence of spinal epidural hematoma in 3705 cases at our institution over a 7-year period of patients receiving acute postoperative epidural analgesia and heparin 3 times per day. No cases of spinal epidural hematoma were reported (95% CI, 0-0.0009952).

Thrombosis and Anti-phospholipid Syndrome: a 5-Year Update on Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an update of the therapeutic tools for thrombotic anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS), focusing on the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early studies appointed anticoagulation at moderate intensity as the mainstay of treatment of thrombotic APS; in the last 5 years, the strategy has not much mutated. Some uncertainties regarding the role of direct oral anticoagulants and the optimal regimen for arterial thrombotic APS still persist: high-intensity anticoagulation, anticoagulation plus anti-platelet agent, and double anti-platelet agents being the possible alternatives. Several drugs have been proposed as effective additional tools for the management of thrombotic APS: hydroxychloroquine, statins, vitamin D, and sirolimus might be beneficial when added on the top of anticoagulation. Pregnant women with thrombotic APS should be switched to low-dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin at therapeutic dose. Despite adequate treatment, APS patients display a significant rate of recurrences; rituximab, eculizumab, and intravenous immunoglobulins are among the options to be considered for these patients. From 2013 to date, the kaleidoscope of therapeutic options in thrombotic APS has been enriched, but tangible improvements in the management of patients are still awaited.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in pregnant patients with a history of venous thromboembolic disease: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Optimal prophylactic strategies in pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive pregnant patients with a previous VTE history. Patients were followed until 6 weeks postpartum. Patients with a previous unprovoked event (including antepartum VTE) received antenatal prophylaxis, mostly with low dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). All patients received prophylaxis for six weeks after delivery.

RESULTS

We included a total of 199 pregnancies in 142 women. Of these, 147 pregnancies occurred in women with unprovoked or estrogen-related VTE history and 52 pregnancies in women with provoked VTE. There were 8 recurrences in 199 pregnancies (4%; 95%CI: 2.05-7.73), of which 5 were antepartum recurrences (2.5%; 95%CI 1.08-5.75) and 3 were postpartum (1.5%; 95% CI 0.51-4.34). In the unprovoked VTE group there were 7 recurrences (4.7%; 95%CI: 2.32-9.50), whereas in the provoked VTE group there was 1 (1.9%; 95%CI: 0.34-10.12). There was one major bleeding event in a patient not receiving LMWH secondary to placental abruption.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the use of prophylactic doses of LMWH during pregnancy and puerperium, as described in this study, results in low occurrence of ante- and postpartum VTE recurrences in patients with previous VTE. Further studies are required to confirm this observation.

Implications of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients presenting with hip fractures: a current concepts review

The increasing use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of thromboembolic disease poses a significant challenge to orthopaedic surgeons treating elderly patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures. Early surgical intervention is known to be beneficial from a clinical perspective and has been encouraged in the UK through the introduction of best practice tariffs providing increased remuneration for prompt treatment. An understanding of the necessary delay to surgery or reversal options for each type of antiplatelet or anticoagulant agent is therefore important. A number of professional bodies have recently produced guidelines that help clinicians manage these patients during the peri-operative period. We review the guidelines relating to antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents during the perioperative period with respect to hip fracture surgery. Antiplatelet agents should not interfere with timing of surgery, but may affect the choice of anaesthetic performed. The action of warfarin should be reversed to expedite surgery. Newer direct oral anticoagulants are more problematic and surgical delay may be necessary, though reversal agents are becoming available.

Clotting-Factor Concentrations 5 Days After Discontinuation of Warfarin

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine guidelines recommend discontinuation of warfarin and an international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.2 or less before a neuraxial injection. The European and Scandinavian guidelines accept an INR of 1.4 or less. We evaluated INR and levels of clotting factors (CFs) II, VII, IX, and X 5 days after discontinuation of warfarin.

METHODS

Patients who discontinued warfarin for 5 days and had an INR of 1.4 or less had activities of factors II, VII, IX, and X measured. The primary outcome was the frequency of subjects with CF activities of less than 40%.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were studied; 21 (91%) had an INR of 1.2 or less. In these 21 patients, the median (interquartile range) activities of factors II, VII, IX, and X were 66% (52%-80%), 114% (95%-132%), 101% (84%-121%), and 55% (46%-63%), respectively. Ninety-five percent (99% confidence interval, 69%-99%) had CF activities of greater than 40%. The patient who did not CF activities greater than 40% had end-stage renal disease. Two subjects had an INR of greater than 1.2; the activities of factor II, VII, IX, and X were 37% and 46%, 89% and 105%, 66% and 78%, and 20% and 36%, respectively. Neither patient had CF activities of greater than 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on 40% activity of CFs, patients with INRs of 1.2 or less can be considered to have adequate CFs to undergo neuraxial injections. The number of patients with an INR of 1.3 and 1.4 is too small to make conclusions.

National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Venous Thromboembolism

Obstetric venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Maternal death from thromboembolism is amenable to prevention, and thromboprophylaxis is the most readily implementable means of systematically reducing the maternal death rate. Observational data support the benefit of risk-factor-based prophylaxis in reducing obstetric thromboembolism. This bundle, developed by a multidisciplinary working group and published by the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care, supports routine thromboembolism risk assessment for obstetric patients, with appropriate use of pharmacologic and mechanical thromboprophylaxis. Safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity unit. The safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged.

Staged Surgical Palliation for HLHS in a Girl with Severe Factor X Deficiency

Background  Factor X deficiency (also known as Stuart-Prower factor deficiency) is an autosomal recessive extremely rare hereditary hematologic disorder, affecting around 1:1,000,000 of the general population. Case Presentation  This case report describes a patient with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and severe factor X deficiency, who underwent staged surgical palliation. From stage 1 Norwood palliation, through superior cavopulmonary anastomosis and ending with total cavopulmonary connection with satisfactory hemostasis and no significant perioperative bleeding complication. Conclusion  The need to maintain hemostasis while aiming to prevent intracardiac thrombosis requires multidisciplinary team approach including hematologist, cardiac surgeon, pediatric cardiac intensivist, and anesthesiologist along with meticulous hemostasis during surgery and careful monitoring of coagulation profile in the postoperative period.