Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Robot-Assisted Navigation versus Computer-Assisted Navigation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Efficiency and Accuracy

Background. Since the introduction of robot-assisted navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there has been little research conducted examining the efficiency and accuracy of the system compared to computer-assisted navigation systems. Objective. To compare the efficiency and accuracy of Praxim robot-assisted navigation (RAN) and Stryker computer-assisted navigation (CAN) in primary TKA. Methods. This was a retrospective study consisting of 52 patients who underwent primary TKA utilizing RAN and 29 patients utilizing CAN. The primary outcome measure was navigation time. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative final mechanical axis alignment, intraoperative robot-assisted bone cut accuracy, tourniquet time, and hospitalization length. Results. RAN navigation times were, on average, 9.0 minutes shorter compared to CAN after adjustment. The average absolute intraoperative malalignment was 0.5° less in the RAN procedures compared to the CAN procedures after adjustment. Patients in the RAN group tended to be discharged 0.6 days earlier compared to patients in the CAN group after adjustment. Conclusions. Among patients undergoing TKA, there was decreased navigation time, decreased final malalignment, and decreased hospitalization length associated with the use of RAN when compared to CAN independent of age, BMI, and pre-replacement alignment.

A comparison of classical and anatomical total knee alignment methods in robotic total knee arthroplasty: classical and anatomical knee alignment methods in TKA

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes achieved using classical and anatomical alignment methods in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred and seventeen patients were randomly assigned to undergo robotic-assisted TKA using either the classical (56 patients) or the anatomical alignment method (61 patients). Clinical outcomes including varus and valgus laxities, ROM, HSS and WOMAC scores and radiological outcomes were evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Varus and valgus laxity assessments showed no significant inter-group differences (P>0.05). Moreover, no significant differences were observed in ROM, HSS and WOMAC scores (P>0.05). We could not find any significant difference in mechanical alignment of the lower limb. The results of this study show that two alignment methods provide comparable clinical and radiological outcomes after primary TKA.

A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty

Knee arthroplasty is used to treat patients with degenerative joint disease of the knee to reduce pain and restore the function of the joint. Although patient outcomes are generally quite good, there are still a number of patients that are dissatisfied with their procedures. Aside from implant design which has largely become standard, surgical technique is one of the main factors that determine clinical results. Therefore, a lot of effort has gone into improving surgical technique including the use of computer-aided surgery. The latest generation of orthopedic surgical tools involves the use of robotics to enhance the surgeons' abilities to install implants more precisely and consistently. This review presents an evolution of robot-assisted surgical systems for knee replacement with an emphasis on the clinical results available in the literature. Ever since various robotic-assistance systems were developed and used clinically worldwide, studies have demonstrated that these systems are as safe as and more accurate than conventional methods of manual implantation. Robotic surgical assistance will likely result in improved surgical technique and improved clinical results.

Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown mechanical alignment influences the outcome of TKA. Robotic systems have been developed to improve the precision and accuracy of achieving component position and mechanical alignment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined whether robotic-assisted implantation for TKA (1) improved clinical outcome; (2) improved mechanical axis alignment and implant inclination in the coronal and sagittal planes; (3) improved the balance (flexion and extension gaps); and (4) reduced complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time when compared to conventionally implanted TKA over an intermediate-term (minimum 3-year) followup period.

METHODS

We prospectively randomized 100 patients who underwent unilateral TKA into one of two groups: 50 using a robotic-assisted procedure and 50 using conventional manual techniques. Outcome variables considered were postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, mechanical axis alignment, flexion/extension gap balance, complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time. Minimum followup was 41 months (mean, 65 months; range, 41-81 months).

RESULTS

There were no differences in postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, and HSS knee scores. The robotic-assisted group resulted in no mechanical axis outliers (> ± 3° from neutral) compared to 24% in the conventional group. There were fewer robotic-assisted knees where the flexion gap exceeded the extension gap by 2 mm. The robotic-assisted procedures took an average of 25 minutes longer than the conventional procedures but had less postoperative blood drainage. There were no differences in complications between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted TKA appears to reduce the number of mechanical axis alignment outliers and improve the ability to achieve flexion-extension gap balance, without any differences in clinical scores or complications when compared to conventional manual techniques.

Robot-assisted implantation improves the precision of component position in minimally invasive TKA

Minimally invasive and robot-assisted procedures have potential advantages when used for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to examine whether robot-assisted minimally invasive procedures improve TKA alignment after modifying the robotic techniques and instruments. Total knee arthroplasties were performed on 10 pairs of fresh cadaveric femora. Ten knees were replaced using the robot-assisted minimally invasive technique and 10 using the conventional minimally invasive technique. After prosthesis implantation, limb and prosthesis alignments were investigated by measuring mechanical axis deviation, femoral and tibial sagittal and coronal inclination, and femoral rotational alignment with 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Postoperative alignment accuracy of the implanted prostheses was better in the robot-assisted minimally invasive TKA group than in the conventional minimally invasive TKA group as judged by the rotational alignment of the femoral component (0.7°±″.3° vs 3.6°±2.2°, respectively) and the tibial component sagittal angle (7.8°±1.1° vs 5.5°±3.6°, respectively). One sagittal inclination outlier for the tibial side existed in the robotic minimally invasive TKA group, and 2 outliers for the mechanical axis, 2 for the tibial side sagittal inclination, and 2 for the femoral rotational alignment existed in the conventional minimally invasive TKA group. Higher implanted prostheses accuracy and fewer outliers in postoperative radiographic alignments can be attained with robot-assisted TKA. Minimally invasive TKA in combination with an improved robot-assisted technique is an alternative option to compensate for the shortcomings of conventional minimally invasive TKA.

Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment

INTRODUCTION

A functional total knee replacement has to be well aligned, which implies that it should lie along the mechanical axis and in the correct axial and rotational planes. Incorrect alignment will lead to abnormal wear, early mechanical loosening, and patellofemoral problems. There has been increased interest of late in total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance. This study was conducted to determine whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to the conventional surgical method with regard to the precision of implant positioning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty knee replacements, comprising ten robot-assisted procedures and ten conventional operations, were performed on ten cadavers. Two experienced surgeons performed the surgeries. Both procedures on each cadaver were performed by the same surgeon. The choice of which procedure was to be performed first was randomized. Following implantation of the prosthesis, the mechanical axis deviation, femoral coronal angle, tibial coronal angle, femoral sagittal angle, tibial sagittal angle, and femoral rotational alignment were measured via 3D CT scanning. These variables were then compared with the preoperatively planned values.

RESULTS

In the knees that underwent robot-assisted surgery, the mechanical axis deviation ranged from -1.94° to 2.13° (mean: -0.21°), the femoral coronal angle from 88.08° to 90.99° (mean: 89.81°), the tibial coronal angle from 89.01° to 92.36° (mean: 90.42°), the tibial sagittal angle from 81.72° to 86.24° (mean: 83.20°), and the femoral rotational alignment from 0.02° to 1.15° (mean: 0.52°) in relation to the transepicondylar axis. In the knees that underwent conventional surgery, the mechanical axis deviation ranged from -3.19° to 3.84° (mean: -0.48°), the femoral coronal angle from 88.36° to 92.29° (mean: 90.50°), the tibial coronal angle from 88.15° to 91.51° (mean: 89.83°), the tibial sagittal angle from 80.06° to 87.34° (mean: 84.50°), and the femoral rotational alignment from 0.32° to 4.13° (mean: 2.76°) in relation to the transepicondylar axis. In the conventional knee replacement group, there were two instances of outliers outside the range of 3° varus/valgus for the mechanical axis deviation. The robot-assisted knee replacements showed significantly superior femoral rotational alignment results compared with conventional surgery (p = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty with regard to the other variables. All the measurements showed high intra-observer and inter-observer reliability.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed excellent precision in the sagittal and coronal planes of the 3D CT scan. In particular, the robot-assisted technique showed better accuracy in femoral rotational alignment compared to the conventional surgery, despite the fact that the surgeons who performed the operations were more experienced and familiar with the conventional method than with robot-assisted surgery. It can thus be concluded that robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

The Position of Proximal Reference Point of Tibia Plateau for Correct Tibial Osteotomy in Total Knee Replacement: Prospective Randomized and 6 Years Follow-up Study

Purpose

When there is a varus deformity in proximal tibia, the extension of a tibial shaft axis tends to pass through the lateral intercondylar eminence. A prospective randomized study was conducted to find out whether the lateral eminence of tibia could serve as a reference point for proximal tibial osteotomy during total knee arthroplasty and results from 6-years follow up period were reported.

Materials and Methods

Forty-six patients (50 knees) who received total knee replacement arthroplasty from April to December 2004, were randomly divided into two groups. For a proximal tibial osteotomy, the proximal tibial reference point was located at the center of intercondylar eminence for group I and at the lateral eminence for group II and subsequently, the results were evaluated. Radiologic indices were the angles between the axis of the prosthesis and the mechanical/shaft axes of tibia and angle of the prosthesis in sagittal plane. Clinical indices were pain and function score of American knee society, functional score of Hospital for Special Surgery and range of knee joint motion.

Results

The angles between the axis of the prostheses and the mechanical/shaft axes of tibia were varus 1.64°/2.12° in group I and valgus 0.57°/0.38° in group II (p=0.589/p=0.558). There were 6 cases of outliers (27.2%) in group 1 and 3 cases (15.0%) in group 2. There was a significant difference in the pain score between group I (82.9) and II (91.4) (p=0.032), respectively.

Conclusions

By moving the reference point of proximal tibial osteotomy laterally, lower incidence of outlier and residual varus deformity could be achieved.

Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity

PURPOSE

Extra-articular post-traumatic deformity may make difficult the implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Staged surgical procedures, including femoral or tibial osteotomy, can be required to restore proper alignment. These procedures may be inappropriate because of high rate of complications. Intra-articular resection is an alternative procedure, but it is limited by the potential compromise of collateral knee ligaments. Conventional instrumentation cannot be used in patients with previous trauma and residual bone deformity. We want to assess whether computer-assisted surgery may be a good alternative to traditional techniques.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive TKAs were performed in 20 patients (12 men and 8 women) with knee arthritis due to extra-articular deformity. The mean age was 52 years. According to Moreland method, the mean (± standard deviation) of the pre-operative hip-knee-ankle angle was 10.4° ± 8.3° in varus. In all cases, an image-free knee navigation system was used because of the severe deformity or the presence of retained hardware that prevented the use of the intramedullary rod. The average follow-up was 3.1 years.

RESULTS

One month after surgery, the mean hip-knee-ankle angle was 0.8° ± 1.2° in varus. At follow-up, the Knee Society Score increased from an average of 48 pre-operatively to 91 (P < 0.05) post-operatively, with over 90% of excellent and good results. Mean range of motion improved from a 7°-74° mean range pre-operatively to 0°-94° post-operatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The general value of navigation systems in achieving accurate bone cuts and restoring the mechanical axis has been established in the literature for standard TKA but not yet for extra-articular deformity. Our findings at mid-term follow-up on a large cohort of these patients showed that these systems used for intra-articular resection are a very effective alternative to previous techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective study, Level IV.

Sequential versus automated cutting guides in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty

The accuracy and efficiency of automated cutting guides in CAS systems have not been previously compared with conventional CAS techniques. Therefore, it is not yet clear if these more advanced technologies are warranted. We hypothesized that a novel automated cutting guide with CAS for total knee arthroplasty would be more efficient and more accurate than conventional navigation with sequential cutting blocks. Twelve cadaver legs were used in total. Each leg was randomly assigned to either an automated guide positioning or a conventional freehand computer-navigated guide positioning. The guide positions postosseous fixation and the final bone-cut surfaces were digitized and compared to the targeted cutting planes. The final location of the impacted trial implant was also digitized and compared to the planned implant location. The time for each step and the total time taken to prepare the femur were measured for both groups. The mean femoral preparation time was shorter with the automated cutting guide than the conventional method (5.5 min versus 13.8 min, p<0.001). The average deviation in the final bone resections from the planned resections was significantly lower for the automated cutting guide in the frontal/rotational plane (0.55° versus 1.1°), sagittal plane (0.75° versus 2.0°), and cut height direction (0.56 mm versus 1.6 mm). Therefore, based on these results, we concluded that automated cutting-guide positioning resulted in more efficient and more accurate femoral cuts in comparison to the conventional navigation method in a cadaveric model.

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study

PURPOSE

The authors performed this study to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in same patient simultaneously. It was hypothesized that the robotic-assisted procedure would produce better leg alignment and component orientation, and thus, improve patient satisfaction and clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent bilateral sequential total knee replacement. One knee was replaced by robotic-assisted implantation and the other by conventional implantation.

RESULTS

Radiographic results showed significantly more postoperative leg alignment outliers of conventional sides than robotic-assisted sides (mechanical axis, coronal inclination of the femoral prosthesis, and sagittal inclination of the tibial prosthesis). Robotic-assisted sides had non-significantly better postoperative knee scores and ROMs. Robotic-assisted sides needed longer operation times (25 min, SD ± 18) and longer skin incisions. Nevertheless, postoperative bleeding was significantly less for robotic-assisted sides.

CONCLUSION

The better alignment accuracy of robotic TKA and the good clinical results achieved may favorably influence clinical and radiological outcomes.

Causes and patterns of aborting a robot-assisted arthroplasty

For a successful robot-assisted arthroplasty, every step should be executed harmoniously. However, when we encounter serious obstacles during surgery, it is sometimes better to abort the procedure in a timely manner. This study investigated the possible causes and patterns of aborted robot-assisted arthroplasties. Of 100 consecutively planned robot-assisted arthroplasties, 22 cases were aborted. Most involved total knee arthroplasty (21/22 cases). We classified the causes according to the stage at which they occurred and the type of error. Abortions after starting the milling procedure and abortions due to an interactive factor were the most common. We believe that this study can guide surgeons to effective decision making during robot-assisted arthroplasty.

How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?

The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and inter-observer variability of the registration of bony landmarks and alignment axes on a Computed Axial Tomography (CT) scan. Six cadaver specimens were scanned. Three-dimensional surface models of the knee were created. Three observers marked anatomic surface landmarks and alignment landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability of the point and axis registration was performed. Mean intra-observer precision ranks around 1 mm for all landmarks. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer variability ranked higher than 0.98 for all landmarks. The highest recorded intra- and inter-observer variability was 1.3 mm and 3.5 mm respectively and was observed for the lateral femoral epicondyle. The lowest variability in the determination of axes was found for the femoral mechanical axis (intra-observer 0.12 degrees and inter-observer 0.19 degrees) and for the tibial mechanical axis (respectively 0.15 degrees and 0.28 degrees). In the horizontal plane the lowest variability was observed for the posterior condylar line of the femur (intra-observer 0.17 degrees and inter-observer 0.78 degrees) and for the transverse axis (respectively 1.89 degrees and 2.03) on the tibia. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter-observer variability in the CT registration of landmarks that define the coordinate system of the femur and the tibia. In the femur, the horizontal plane projections of the posterior condylar line and the surgical and anatomical transepicondylar axis can be determined precisely on a CT scan, using the described methodology. In the tibia, the best result is obtained for the tibial transverse axis.

Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon grafts

During a short period of time, surgical robots had been propagated for automated tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Clinical outcome data are currently unavailable. Between 2000 and 2003, 152 patients underwent ACL replacement with the assistance of the Computer Assisted Surgical Planning and Robotics system (CASPAR, OrtoMaquet, Germany) at our hospital. After minimal invasive pin placement in both the tibia and femur, computed tomography was used to register anatomical landmarks and to plan graft tunnel alignment. The robot was used to drill tibial and femoral tunnels in an outside-in fashion according to pre-operative planning. There was one procedure-specific Serious Adverse Event (i.e., an intraoperative transection of the posterior cruciate ligament). After IRB approval, all patients were invited for a follow-up examination. Data from 100 patients (35 women, 65 men, mean age 35 [SD 11] years, median follow-up 61 [range 42-77] months) form the basis of this report. Side-to-side differences in anterior laxity were measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Patient-centered outcomes included the Lysholm-Score, the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and the Short Form 36 (SF36). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-1.26] mm. Eight and five patients had a positive Lachman and pivot shift test, respectively. The Lysholm-Score averaged 86 (95% CI 83-89) points. Excellent, good, fair, and poor outcomes were reported by 38, 32, 20, and 10 patients. The LEFS averaged 85 (95% CI 82-88) points. The mean SF36 Physical Component Score was 48.4 (95% CI 46.5-50.3), indicating residual deficits compared to the population norm. All tibial graft tunnels did not cross the Blumensaat line, but were placed slightly anterior to the optimal center of 42% reported in previous studies. Compared to literature data, robot-assisted ACL reconstruction with BTB grafts may lead to higher knee stability, but poorer functional outcomes. The immense additional efforts with the procedure did not pay off in a benefit to patients.